Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 464
Filter
2.
Am J Case Rep ; 25: e943915, 2024 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Parinaud oculoglandular syndrome is a unilateral granulomatous palpebral conjunctivitis associated with preauricular, submandibular, and cervical lymphadenopathies. Several infectious diseases can cause Parinaud oculoglandular syndrome, usually with a conjunctival entry. The most common underlying pathology is cat scratch disease, followed by the oculoglandular form of tularemia. Diagnosis is usually a serious challenge as these infections are themselves rare. On the other hand, Parinaud oculoglandular syndrome may be a rare manifestation of more common disorders (eg, tuberculosis, syphilis, mumps, herpes simplex and Epstein-Barr virus, adenovirus, Rickettsia, Sporothrix, Chlamydia infections). CASE REPORT We present the case of a 66-year-old man with granulomatous conjunctivitis and ipsilateral preauricular, submandibular, and upper cervical lymphadenopathies following a superficial corneal injury. Although the systematic amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and metronidazole antibiotic therapy started immediately at admission, the suppuration of the lymph nodes required surgical drainage. Based on his anamnesis (sheep breeding; a twig scratching his eye 2 days before the initial attendance) and symptoms, a zoonosis, namely the oculoglandular form of tularemia, was suspected, empiric ciprofloxacin therapy was administered, and the patient recovered without sequelae. The Francisella tularensis infection was eventually confirmed by microagglutination serologic assay. CONCLUSIONS If Parinaud oculoglandular syndrome is diagnosed and cat scratch fever as the most common etiology is not likely, other zoonoses, especially the oculoglandular form of tularemia, should be suspected. Serology is the most common laboratory method of diagnosing tularemia. Empiric fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) or aminoglycoside (gentamicin or streptomycin) antibiotic therapy should be started immediately at the slightest suspicion of oculoglandular tularemia.


Subject(s)
Francisella tularensis , Tularemia , Humans , Male , Tularemia/diagnosis , Tularemia/complications , Tularemia/drug therapy , Aged , Francisella tularensis/isolation & purification , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/microbiology , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Syndrome , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ocular Motility Disorders/etiology , Ocular Motility Disorders/diagnosis , Lymphadenopathy/microbiology
4.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 13(7): 341-348, 2024 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infectious conjunctivitis affects 1 in 8 children annually, resulting in high ophthalmic antibiotic prescribing and absenteeism from childcare and school. We aimed to quantify the cost-effectiveness and annual savings of 3 evidence-based approaches to conjunctivitis management and return to childcare and school compared to usual care. METHODS: Using a decision analytic model from a societal perspective over a 1-year time horizon, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of 3 management strategies for children aged 6 months to 17 years with non-severe conjunctivitis compared to usual care in the United States. Strategies accounted for rate of transmission. Strategies included (1) refraining from prescribing ophthalmic antibiotics for non-severe conjunctivitis, (2) allowing children without systemic symptoms to attend childcare and school, (3) and the combined approach of refraining from prescribing ophthalmic antibiotics and allowing children without systemic symptoms to attend childcare and school. RESULTS: The estimated annual expenditure for pediatric conjunctivitis was $1.95 billion. Usual care was the most expensive ($212.73/episode), followed by refraining from ophthalmic antibiotic prescribing ($199.92) and allowing children without systemic symptoms to attend childcare and school ($140.18). The combined approach was the least costly ($127.38). Disutility was similar between approaches (quality-adjusted life days 0.271 vs 0.274). Refraining from antibiotic prescribing and the combination approach were dominant compared to usual care. The combined approach resulted in an estimated $783 million annual savings and 1.6 million ophthalmic antibiotic courses averted. CONCLUSIONS: Conjunctivitis poses an economic burden that could be reduced by refraining from ophthalmic antibiotic use and allowing children without systemic symptoms to remain at school or childcare.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Child , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Infant , Conjunctivitis/economics , Conjunctivitis/drug therapy , United States , Schools , Absenteeism , Child Care/economics , Female , Decision Support Techniques , Male , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/economics
6.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 25(4): 77, 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589761

ABSTRACT

Keratin has the potential to function as the gel matrix in an ophthalmic formulation for the encapsulation of the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin. The quality of this formulation was thoroughly evaluated through various analyses, such as in vitro release assessment, rheological examination, intraocular retention studies in rabbits, assessment of bacteriostatic efficacy, and safety evaluations. It is worth mentioning that the gel demonstrated shear thinning properties and exhibited characteristics of an elastic solid, thereby confirming its structural stability. The gel demonstrated a notable affinity for mucosal surfaces in comparison to traditional azithromycin aqueous solutions. In vitro release testing revealed that drug release transpired via diffusion mechanisms, following a first-order kinetic release pattern. Additionally, the formulated gel exhibited remarkable antibacterial efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in bacteriostatic evaluations. Lastly, safety assessments confirmed that the gel eye drops induced minimal irritation and displayed no apparent cytotoxicity, indicating their good safety and biocompatibility for ocular application. Thus, these findings indicated that the prepared azithromycin gel eye drops complied with the requisite standards for ophthalmic preparations.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Drug Delivery Systems , Animals , Rabbits , Azithromycin/pharmacology , Keratins/therapeutic use , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gels/chemistry , Ophthalmic Solutions/chemistry
7.
J AAPOS ; 28(3): 103900, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537895

ABSTRACT

Streptococcus pyogenes (group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus, GABHS) causes a range of human infections, including necrotizing fasciitis and toxic shock syndrome, because it produces exotoxins that damage host cells, facilitate immune evasion, and serve as T cell superantigens. GABHS conjunctivitis is rare. We report a case of membranous conjunctivitis in a 3-year-old child who was treated with a combination of targeted bactericidal antimicrobials, toxin-synthesis inhibition, and amniotic membrane transplantation.


Subject(s)
Amnion , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Keratoconjunctivitis , Streptococcal Infections , Streptococcus pyogenes , Humans , Amnion/transplantation , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolation & purification , Streptococcal Infections/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Child, Preschool , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Keratoconjunctivitis/microbiology , Keratoconjunctivitis/drug therapy , Keratoconjunctivitis/diagnosis , Keratoconjunctivitis/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Eye Infections, Bacterial/microbiology , Eye Infections, Bacterial/drug therapy , Eye Infections, Bacterial/diagnosis , Male , Drug Therapy, Combination , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/microbiology , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Female
8.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 241(2): 231-246, 2024 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37977204

ABSTRACT

Bacterial conjunctivitis is a leading cause of infectious conjunctivitis in children and second most common cause in adults. Although often self-limiting, it can lead to complications like corneal scarring and systemic infections in high-risk groups including newborns and immunocompromised patients. Thus, prompt diagnosis and treatment are essential for these vulnerable populations. Common bacterial causes are Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae in adults and Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in children. Clinical features alone do not reliably identify the causative pathogen. Microbiological testing is necessary for persistent or severe cases. Topical antibiotics like azithromycin or fluorochinolones are usually prescribed. However, gonococcal and chlamydial conjunctivitis warrant systemic antibiotics due to their potential for severe complications. Increasing antibiotic resistance might even necessitate tailored therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility profiles. Screening and treating pregnant women is an effective prevention strategy by reducing perinatal transmission (especially of gonococcal and chlamydial infections). In summary, while often self-limiting, potential complications and rising antibiotic resistance underscore the importance of timely diagnosis and treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Preventive measures including maternal screening are crucial public health initiatives to curb the risks associated with this common eye infection.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Conjunctivitis , Infant, Newborn , Child , Adult , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Azithromycin/therapeutic use
9.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 257: 143-153, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482371

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To summarize key findings from a Cochrane review of the benefits and safety of antibiotic therapy compared with placebo (or vehicle) for acute bacterial conjunctivitis. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We included placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared topical antibiotics with placebo. We followed Cochrane methods for trial selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and evidence synthesis. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs involving 8805 participants with acute bacterial conjunctivitis were included. Fifteen (71%) RCTs examined fluoroquinolone (FQ) drops, 3 tested macrolides, alone or in combination with steroids, and another 3 compared other non-FQ antibiotics. Intention-to-treat estimates suggested that compared with placebo, antibiotics may increase clinical recovery by 26% (risk ratio [RR]: 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.46) at the end of therapy (5 RCTs, 1474 participants). Modified intention-to-treat estimates, in which only participants with laboratory-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis were analyzed, indicated that antibiotics were associated with 53% higher likelihood of microbiological cure as compared with placebo (RR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.34-1.74; 10 RCTs, 2827 participants). Non-FQs (RR: 4.05; 95% CI: 1.36-12.00), but not FQs (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90), were likely to increase treatment-associated ocular complications such as eye pain, discomfort, and allergic reactions; the certainty of level of evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate level certainty of evidence suggested that antibiotics may increase the likelihood of clinical recovery and microbiological clearance compared with placebo. Very low-level certainty of evidence suggested that antibiotics may be associated with potential harm in patients with acute bacterial conjunctivitis, but the potential risk of bias from study design, inconsistency in outcome measurement, and reporting limit the evidence to very low certainty.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy
11.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 15(19): 22892-22902, 2023 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37154428

ABSTRACT

Ocular formulations should provide an effective antibiotic concentration at the site of infection to treat bacterial eye infections. However, tears and frequent blinking accelerate the drug clearance rate and limit drug residence time on the ocular surface. This study describes a biological adhesion reticulate structure (BNP/CA-PEG) consisting of antibiotic-loaded bioadhesion nanoparticles (BNP/CA), with an average 500-600 nm diameter, and eight-arm NH2-PEG-NH2 for local and extended ocular drug delivery. This retention-prolonging effect is a function of the Schiff base reaction between groups on the surface of BNP and amidogen on PEG. BNP/CA-PEG showed significantly higher adhesion properties and better treatment efficacy in an ocular rat model with conjunctivitis in comparison to non-adhesive nanoparticles, BNP, or free antibiotics. Both in vivo safety experiment and in vitro cytotoxicity test verified the biocompatibility and biosafety of the biological adhesion reticulate structure, indicating a promising translational prospect for further clinical use.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Nanoparticles , Rats , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Drug Delivery Systems , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Treatment Outcome
12.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 141(6): 609-610, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37166824

ABSTRACT

This case report describes a patient with a chronic urinary tract infection whose long-term treatment for right eye redness, discharge, pain, and decreased vision ultimately led to hospitalization and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to multiple antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Conjunctivitis , Pseudomonas Infections , Humans , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/drug therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/diagnosis , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
13.
Chemotherapy ; 68(4): 228-232, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37231886

ABSTRACT

Neisseria meningitidis represents an uncommon pathogen of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. In this brief report, we describe a case of meningococcal conjunctivitis in an immunocompetent adult male, with a review of the literature. The patient went to the outpatient ophthalmology clinic complaining of severe ocular discomfort, burning, and redness for more than 2 weeks and, at slit lamp examination, he was diagnosed with a mild conjunctivitis. Microbiology cultures of ocular swabs revealed the growth of colonies, as pure culture, identified as N. meningitidis of serogroup B. A diagnosis of primary meningococcal conjunctivitis was made and treatment of patient with intramuscular injections of ceftriaxone in addition to topical moxifloxacin eye drops for 2 weeks led to clinical improvement and, finally, to a complete recovery, in accordance with microbiological findings. Ophthalmologists must be aware of the possibility of primary meningococcal conjunctivitis cases, even uncommon, and the need to treat with systemic antibiotics and their close contacts with adequate antibiotic chemoprophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Conjunctivitis , Meningococcal Infections , Neisseria meningitidis , Adult , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Meningococcal Infections/diagnosis , Meningococcal Infections/drug therapy , Meningococcal Infections/microbiology , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Conjunctivitis/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis/microbiology
14.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 3: CD001211, 2023 03 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36912752

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial conjunctivitis is an infection of the conjunctiva and is one of the most common ocular disorders in primary care. Antibiotics are generally prescribed on the basis that they may speed recovery, reduce persistence, and prevent keratitis. However, many cases of acute bacterial conjunctivitis are self-limited, resolving without antibiotic therapy. This Cochrane Review was first published in The Cochrane Library in 1999, then updated in 2006, 2012, and 2022. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and side effects of antibiotic therapy in the management of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2022, Issue 5), MEDLINE (January 1950 to May 2022), Embase (January 1980 to May 2022), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov), and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases in May 2022.   SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which any form of antibiotic treatment, with or without steroid, had been compared with placebo/vehicle in the management of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. This included topical and systemic antibiotic treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of identified studies. We assessed the full text of all potentially relevant studies and determined the included RCTs, which were further assessed for risk of bias using Cochrane methodology. We performed data extraction in a standardized manner and conducted random-effects meta-analyses using RevMan Web. MAIN RESULTS: We included 21 eligible RCTs, 10 of which were newly identified in this update. A total of 8805 participants were randomized. All treatments were topical in the form of drops or ointment. The trials were heterogeneous in terms of their eligibility criteria, the nature of the intervention (antibiotic drug class, which included fluoroquinolones [FQs] and non-FQs; dosage frequency; duration of treatment), the outcomes assessed and the time points of assessment. We judged one trial to be of high risk of bias, four as low risk of bias, and the others as raising some concerns. Based on intention-to-treat (ITT) population, antibiotics likely improved clinical cure (resolution of clinical symptoms or signs) by 26% (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.46; 5 trials, 1474 participants; moderate certainty) as compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis showed no differences by antibiotic class (P = 0.67) or treatment duration (P = 0.60). In the placebo group, 55.5% (408/735) of participants had spontaneous clinical resolution by days 4 to 9 versus 68.2% (504/739) of participants treated with an antibiotic. Based on modified ITT population, in which participants were analyzed after randomization on the basis of positive microbiological culture, antibiotics likely increased microbiological cure (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.74; 10 trials, 2827 participants) compared with placebo at the end of therapy; there were no subgroup differences by drug class (P = 0.60). No study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic treatment. Patients receiving antibiotics had a lower risk of treatment incompletion than those in the placebo group (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.78; 13 trials, 5573 participants; moderate certainty) and were 27% less likely to have persistent clinical infection (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.81; 19 trials, 5280 participants; moderate certainty). There was no evidence of serious systemic side effects reported in either the antibiotic or placebo group (very low certainty). When compared with placebo, FQs (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90) but not non-FQs (RR 4.05, 95% CI 1.36 to 12.00) may result in fewer participants with ocular side effects. However, the estimated effects were of very low certainty. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this update suggest that the use of topical antibiotics is associated with a modestly improved chance of resolution in comparison to the use of placebo. Since no evidence of serious side effects was reported, use of antibiotics may therefore be considered to achieve better clinical and microbiologic efficacy than placebo. Increasing the proportion of participants with clinical cure or increasing the speed of recovery or both are important for individual return to work or school, allowing people to regain quality of life. Future studies may examine antiseptic treatments with topical antibiotics for reasons of cost and growing antibiotic resistance.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
16.
Eye Contact Lens ; 49(1): 35-41, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36544283

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of black tea extract in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in a rabbit model and compare it with that of gatifloxacin drops. METHODS: Black tea extract was tested in vitro on bacterial cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Forty-two rabbit eyes were cultured with either MRSA (n=21) or P. aeruginosa (n=21) and further divided into a control group (n=5), a tea group (n=8) treated with black tea extract, and a gatifloxacin group (n=8) treated with 0.3% gatifloxacin eye drops. Conjunctival swabs were collected on the third and fifth days. RESULTS: The tea extract successfully inhibited the growth of both organisms at a concentration of 400 mg/mL. Rabbits in the treatment groups showed a reduction in the clinical index on day 2 (P<0.01), unlike the control group (P=0.1), for both organisms. Resolution of conjunctivitis was achieved on days 4 and 5 in the tea and gatifloxacin groups, respectively. On days 3 and 5, while the control group still showed considerable bacterial growth, the tea and gatifloxacin groups showed its inhibition. CONCLUSION: Tea extract has antimicrobial effects similar to those of gatifloxacin in a rabbit model of conjunctivitis.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Conjunctivitis , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Animals , Rabbits , Gatifloxacin/pharmacology , Gatifloxacin/therapeutic use , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis/drug therapy , Tea , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
18.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(1)2022 Jan 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35027379

ABSTRACT

Giant fornix syndrome (GFS) results in chronic, relapsing conjunctivitis in elderly patients with enophthalmos and enlarged fornices, in which infectious material collects and perpetuates inflammation. A 98-year-old woman presented with persistent, bilateral, purulent conjunctivitis; corneal epithelial defects and progressive blepharospasm that did not respond to artificial tears, topical antibiotics and steroids and amniotic membrane grafts. Additional findings of deep-set orbits with enlarged upper fornices were diagnostic of GFS. Over the next 2 months, she responded to a combination of topical and systemic antibiotics, autologous serum eye drops, povidone-iodine forniceal rinses, and hypochlorous acid treatment of the eyelashes. GFS is an important diagnostic consideration in elderly patients with chronic conjunctivitis and deep-set orbits.


Subject(s)
Conjunctival Diseases , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Conjunctivitis , Staphylococcal Infections , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Conjunctivitis/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Lubricant Eye Drops , Povidone-Iodine
19.
Eye (Lond) ; 36(5): 1066-1073, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34035495

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between exposure to topical ophthalmic antibiotics during pregnancy and adverse neonatal outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified pregnant women with hordeola, chalazia, blepharitis, or bacterial conjunctivitis from 2005 to 2018 using the Japanese Medical Data Centre Claims Database. From the eligible women, we extracted women who were dispensed no topical antibiotics during the first trimester (non-antibiotic group), women who were dispensed topical fluoroquinolones alone at least once (fluoroquinolone alone group), and women who were dispensed any single type of antibiotic (single-antibiotic group). We compared the frequency of congenital anomalies (CA), preterm birth (PB), low birth weight (LBW), and the composite outcome of these three between the fluoroquinolone and non-antibiotic groups and between the single-antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups, using propensity score adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 891 eligible women were identified. In the fluoroquinolone (n = 409) and non-antibiotic (n = 309) groups, CA occurred in 6.8% and 6.8%, PB in 2.4% and 3.2%, LBW in 2.9% and 3.2%, and the composite outcome in 10.5% and 11.3%, respectively. Analysis using propensity score adjustment showed no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of CA (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-2.18), PB (0.80; 0.30-2.17), LBW (1.08; 0.45-2.63), or the composite outcome (1.12; 0.67-1.87). Comparison of the single-antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Topical ophthalmic antibiotics for hordeola, chalazia, blepharitis, or bacterial conjunctivitis during the first trimester were not associated with increased adverse neonatal outcomes.


Subject(s)
Blepharitis , Chalazion , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Premature Birth , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Blepharitis/chemically induced , Blepharitis/drug therapy , Chalazion/chemically induced , Chalazion/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/chemically induced , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/microbiology , Female , Fluoroquinolones/adverse effects , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Premature Birth/chemically induced , Premature Birth/drug therapy , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies
20.
J Med Microbiol ; 70(9)2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34494952

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Gonorrhoea is a sexually transmitted disease whose incidence has increased in recent years and adult gonococcal conjunctivitis (AGC) is a relatively uncommon complication.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. AGC is associated with increased incidence of genital gonorrhoea and must be treated correctly to avoid serious corneal complications.Aims. To report the prevalence, clinical features, and complications of AGC in a tertiary ophthalmology centre in Barcelona, Spain. Present epidemiological data, clinical features, ocular complications, and antibiotic susceptibility. Design: Single-centre, descriptive, retrospective case series.Methodology. Systematic case-defined search in medical records and further retrospective chart review study of microbiologically confirmed AGC attending outpatient clinic and/or emergency room from 2012 to 2020. We analysed the clinical presentation, treatments, antibiotic susceptibility, complications and ocular sequelae.Results. Thirteen patients were diagnosed of AGC. Eleven patients had unilateral presentation. Two patients had bilateral presentation. In ten cases there was abundant mucopurulent discharge, three cases presented periocular pain and periocular inflammation requiring a CT scan to rule out post-septal cellulitis. The diagnosis was confirmed by culture. In total, 100 % of strains were susceptible to ceftriaxone, 58 % were ciprofloxacin resistant and no beta-lactamase production was detected. Three patients required hospital admission. One patient developed a complication presenting with ptosis caused by superior symblepharon.Conclusion. AGC is a rare disease which is difficult to diagnose as it requires a high index of suspicion to prevent corneal perforation but in an important number of cases it may mimic orbital cellulitis. It is crucial that treatment starts as soon as possible to avoid serious corneal damage. Patients should promptly receive complete and correct treatment when admitted to the emergency room since an elevated number of patients do not attend their medical follow-up visit. Azithromycin or aminoglycoside eye drops are probably the best option to complete the treatment, due to high quinolone resistance.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Gonorrhea , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolation & purification , Ophthalmic Solutions/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aminoglycosides/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/epidemiology , Gonorrhea/drug therapy , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL