Global trends in restenosis research within acute coronary syndrome: a bibliometric analysis.

OBJECTIVE: According to the World Health Organization, 17.9 million individuals died from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in 2019, constituting 32% of all global mortalities. In recent years, percutaneous coronary interventions such as stenting have become a common treatment approach for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the problem of angina recurrence after stenting, associated with in-stent restenosis, persists. The aim of this study was to elucidate the intricate structure of relevant countries and regions, prominent research institutions, prolific authors, and recurring keywords shaping the landscape of this field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search strategy involved Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases on December 13, 2023. Bibliometric analysis was performed using the Bibliometrix R-package. RESULTS: An upward trend was found, characterized by an annual growth rate (AGR) of 6.82%. China leads with 17 publications, followed by Argentina with 14 and Italy with 9. Capital Medical University from China has published the largest number of articles in the field. The most significant number of publications were published in the American Journal of Cardiology. Among the top ten authors, Kim J. has published six articles and Yang C. has published four, making them the most productive in the field. "In-stent restenosis" and "percutaneous coronary intervention" were the most frequently used terms between 2002 and 2023. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to note that the majority of studies examined were conducted in developed countries, which may influence the generalization of results. Nevertheless, there is also considerable attention to the topic from scientific groups in developing countries. This analysis helps identify gaps in the current research field and define directions for future studies.

Non-target lesion progression: Unveiling critical predictors and outcomes in patients with in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the primary treatment for coronary artery disease. However, while PCI effectively addresses severe stenosis or occlusive lesions in target vessels, the progression of non-target vessel plaque remains a critical determinant of long-term patient prognosis. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of non-target vascular plaque progression on prognosis after PCI for ISR. METHODS: This study included 195 patients diagnosed with ISR and multivessel disease who underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) placement, along with intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment of the culprit stent. Subsequent rechecked coronary angiography categorized eligible patients into non-target lesion progression (N-TLP) and no-N-TLP groups. We evaluated the baseline morphological characteristics of N-TLP by OCT and investigated the relationship between N-TLP, non-culprit vessel-related major adverse cardiovascular events (NCV-MACE), and pan-vascular disease-related clinical events (PVD-CE) incidence. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus (OR 3.616, 95% CI: 1.735-7.537; P = 0.001), uric acid level (OR 1.005, 95% CI: 1.001-1.009; P = 0.006), in-stent neoatherosclerosis (ISNA) (OR 1.334, 95% CI: 1.114-1.985; P = 0.047) and heterogeneous neointima morphology (OR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.18-5.43; P = 0.019) were independent predictors for N-TLP. Furthermore, N-TLP was associated with a high incidence of NCV-MACE (19.4% vs 6.9%, P = 0.009) and PVD-CE (83.9% [95% CI: 79.7%-88.3%] vs 93.1% [95% CI: 88.4%-98.0%], P = 0.038) after PCI in ISR patients. CONCLUSION: Diabetes, uric acid levels, ISNA, and heterogeneous neointima are predictive factors for subsequent rapid plaque progression, with N-TLP exacerbating the incidence of NCV-MACE and PVD-CE after PCI.

Double Kissing Mini-Culotte Stenting in Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcation Under Optical Coherence Tomography Guidance: Immediate and Short-Term Outcomes.

Culotte stenting is an effective strategy for left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Increased side branch ostial restenosis is the main drawback of culotte stenting. This is due to a napkin ring or potential gap produced at the ostium of the side branch. A bench study by Toth et al11 has shown that additional sequential kissing balloon dilation before main vessel stenting can prevent this deformity. We report immediate and short-term results of double kissing (DK) mini-culotte stenting with a 1-year angiographic follow-up. Between March 2020 and December 2022, 45 patients with distal left main (LM) disease underwent DK mini-culotte stenting at our center under optical coherence tomography guidance. Of 45 patients (male: 35 (77.77%); mean age: 63.67 ± 4.94 years), chronic coronary artery syndrome was present in 26 (57.8%) and unstable angina in the remainder. All lesions were Medina (1,1,1), (0,1,1), or (1,0,1), with a median Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score of 28 (interquartile range 23 to 29). All procedures were technically successful with no adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis). Under optical coherence tomography guidance, adequate minimal stent area of 13.28 ± 0.77 mm2, 8.25 ± 0.29 mm2, and 7.54 ± 0.45 mm2 was achieved in LM, left anterior descending, and left circumflex, respectively. Adequate stent expansion of >80% was achieved in all cases. At the end of 1 year, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was 2.2%. Furthermore, restenosis of the side branch developed in 1 patient (2.2%), which was managed conservatively. DK mini-culotte stenting in the distal LM bifurcation has shown promising results and is effective in preventing side branch stent deformation and its sequelae of in-stent restenosis.

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent implantation in ACS patients with different angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and drug-eluting stents (DES) are two widely used treatments for in-stent restenosis (ISR). Focal and non-focal types of ISR affect the clinical outcomes. The present study aims to compare DES reimplantation versus DCB angioplasty in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with focal ISR and non-focal ISR lesions. METHODS: Patients with ISR lesions underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively evaluated and divided into DES group and DCB group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) at 24 months follow up. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: For focal ISR, TLF was comparable in the DES and DCB groups at 24 months of follow-up (Before PSM, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-1.27; p = 0.244; After PSM, HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.40-1.73; p = 0.625). For non-focal ISR, TLF was significantly decreased in DES compared with DCB group (Before PSM, HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.29-0.63; p < 0.001; After PSM, HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19-0.59; p < 0.001), which was mainly attributed to the lower incidence of clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) (Before PSM, HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.26-0.59; p < 0.001; After PSM, HR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.15-0.54; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes for DES and DCB treatment are similar in focal type of ISR lesions. For non-focal ISR, the treatment of DES showed a significant decrease in TLF which was mainly attributed to a lower incidence of CD-TLR.

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs Plain Balloon Angioplasty in patients with coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a significant challenge in interventional cardiology despite advancements in stent technology. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs), which deliver antiproliferative agents directly to the vessel wall, have emerged as a promising alternative to plain balloon angioplasty for ISR treatment. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of DCBs compared to plain balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary ISR. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase was conducted on June 27, 2024. The search identified randomized controlled trials comparing DCBs and plain balloon angioplasty for ISR treatment. Six trials involving 1,322 patients met the inclusion criteria. Quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data extraction and statistical analysis were performed using RevMan software, assessing heterogeneity with the I2 statistic and publication bias using funnel plots. RESULTS: The analysis showed that DCBs significantly reduced late in-stent and in-segment luminal loss (P < 0.001) and target lesion revascularization (P = 0.02) compared to plain balloon angioplasty. Major adverse cardiovascular events and the combined endpoint of target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, and death also showed highly significant improvements with DCB treatment (P < 0.00001 and P = 0.0002, respectively). However, no significant effect was observed on myocardial infarction and mortality rates. CONCLUSION: DCBs significantly reduce in-stent late luminal loss, target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events compared to plain balloon angioplasty.

Long-Term Results of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: The RIBS VI Study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) provide similar results to drug-coated balloons (DCBs) but are inferior to drug-eluting stents (DES) at 1 year. However, the long-term efficacy of BVS in these patients remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of BVS in patients with ISR. METHODS: RIBS VI (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment; NCT02672878) and RIBS VI Scoring (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment With Scoring Balloon; NTC03069066) are prospective multicenter studies designed to evaluate the results of BVS in patients with ISR (N = 220). The inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical to those used in the RIBS IV (ISR of DES) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Drug-eluting Stents: Drug-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239940) and RIBS V (ISR of bare-metal stents) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239953) randomized trials (including 249 ISR patients treated with DCBs and 249 ISR patients treated with DES). A prespecified comparison of the long-term results obtained with these treatment modalities (ie, DES, DCBs, and BVS) was performed. RESULTS: Clinical follow-up at 3 years was obtained in all (100%) 718 patients. The 3-year target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was 14.1% (vs 12.9% after DCBs [not significant], and 5.2% after DES [HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.47-5.36; P = 0.001]). In a landmark analysis (>1 year), the target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was higher than after DES (adjusted HR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.15-10.08) and DCBs (adjusted HR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.14-9.70). Very late vessel thrombosis was also more frequent with BVS (BVS: 1.8%, DCBs: 0.4%, DES: 0%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, late clinical results of DES are superior to those obtained with DCBs and BVS. Beyond the first year, DCBs are safer and more effective than BVS.

Research Progress on the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Neoatherosclerosis.

Neoatherosclerosis (NA) within stents has become an important clinical problem after coronary artery stent implantation. In-stent restenosis and in-stent thrombosis are the two major complications following coronary stent placement and seriously affect patient prognosis. As the common pathological basis of these two complications, NA plaques, unlike native atherosclerotic plaques, often grow around residual oxidized lipids and stent struts. The main components are foam cells formed by vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) engulfing oxidized lipids at lipid residue sites. Current research mainly focuses on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), but the specific pathogenesis of NA is still unclear. A thorough understanding of the pathogenesis and pathological features of NA provides a theoretical basis for clinical treatment. This article reviews the previous research of our research group and the current situation of domestic and foreign research.

Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloons With Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is the gradual narrowing of the stented coronary segment, presenting as angina or leading to an acute myocardial infarction. Although its incidence has decreased with the use of newer drug-eluting stents (DES), it still carries significant mortality and morbidity risks. We compared the 2 most common interventions for managing DES-related ISR: drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and DES. Electronic databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing DCB with DES in patients with DES-ISR. The Mantel-Haenszel method with a random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratios. Five trials comprising 1,100 patients (577 in DCB and 523 in DES group) were included in the final study. The mean follow-up was 42 months. DCB was found to have a higher risk for target lesion revascularization (risk ratio 1.41, p = 0.02) compared with DES. No difference was observed in all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, or stroke between the 2 intervention arms. In conclusion, management of DES-ISR with DCB has a higher risk of target lesion revascularization compared with re-stenting with DES. The 2 therapeutic interventions are comparable in terms of efficacy and safety profile.

In silico model of stent performance in multi-layered artery using 2-way fluid-structure interaction: Influence of boundary conditions and vessel length.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries (stenosis) are caused by the buildup of lipids and blood-borne substances within the artery wall. Their qualitative and rapid assessment is still a challenging task. The primary therapy for this pathology involves implanting coronary stents, which help to restore the blood flow in atherosclerosis-prone arteries. In-stent restenosis is a stenting-procedure complication detected in about 10-40% of patients. A numerical study using 2-way fluid-structure interaction (FSI) assesses the stenting procedure quality and can decrease the number of negative post-operative results. Nevertheless, boundary conditions (BCs) used in simulation play a crucial role in implementation of an adequate computational analysis. METHODS: Three CoCr stents designs were modelled with the suggested approach. A multi-layer structure describing the artery and plaque with anisotropic hyperelastic mechanical properties was adopted in this study. Two kinds of boundary conditions for a solid domain were examined - fixed support (FS) and remote displacement (RD) - to assess their impact on the hemodynamic parameters to predict restenosis. Additionally, the influence of artery elongation (short-artery model vs. long-artery model) on numerical results with the FS boundary condition was analyzed. RESULTS: The comparison of FS and RD boundary conditions demonstrated that the variation of hemodynamic parameters values did not exceed 2%. The analysis of short-artery and long-artery models revealed that the difference in hemodynamic parameters was less than 5.1%, and in most cases, it did not exceed 2.5%. The RD boundary conditions were found to reduce the computation time by up to 1.7-2.0 times compared to FS. Simple stent model was shown to be susceptible to restenosis development, with maximum WSS values equal to 183 Pa, compared to much lower values for other two stents. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that the stent design significantly affected the hemodynamic parameters as restenosis predictors. Moreover, the stress-strain state of the system artery-plaque-stent also depends on a proper choice of boundary conditions.

Long-Term Outcomes Following Sirolimus-Coated Balloon or Drug-Eluting Stents for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that drug-coated balloons may benefit in-stent restenosis (ISR) treatment. However, the efficacy of new-generation sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) compared with the latest generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) has not been studied in this setting. METHODS: All patients in the EASTBORNE (The All-Comers Sirolimus-Coated Balloon European Registry) and DEB-DRAGON (DEB vs Thin-DES in DES-ISR: Long Term Outcomes) registries undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for DES-ISR were included in the study. The primary study end point was target lesion revascularization at 24 months. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization at 24 months. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCB versus thin-struts DES in ISR at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1545 patients with 1679 ISR lesions were included in the pooled analysis, of whom 621 (40.2%) patients with 621 lesions were treated with thin-strut DES and 924 (59.8%) patients with 1045 lesions were treated with SCB. The unmatched cohort showed no differences in the incidence of target lesion revascularization (10.8% versus 11.8%; P=0.568); however, there was a trend toward lower rates of myocardial infarction (7.4% versus 5.0%; P=0.062) and major adverse cardiovascular events (20.8% versus 17.1%; P=0.072) in the SCB group. After propensity score matching (n=335 patients per group), there were no significant differences in the rates of target lesion revascularization (11.6% versus 11.8%; P=0.329), target vessel revascularization (14.0% versus 13.1%; P=0.822), myocardial infarction (7.2% versus 4.5%; P=0.186), all-cause death (5.7% versus 4.2%; P=0.476), and major adverse cardiovascular event (21.5% versus 17.6%; P=0.242) between DES and SCB treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, angioplasty with SCB compared with thin-struts DES is associated with comparable rates of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty for In-Stent Restenosis of Coronary Arteries.

Despite the advent of newer stents, in-stent restenosis has been a persistent and formidable challenge. Trials have demonstrated the superiority of drug-coated balloons over plain old balloon angioplasty. A recent AGENT IDE PRESTO (Prevention of REStenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes) trial highlighted the need for a more comprehensive understanding; therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to elucidate their respective clinical outcomes. A literature search was conducted by 2 investigators (SS and MH) using MEDLINE (EMBASE and PubMed) using a systematic search strategy by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) until November 1, 2023. CRAN-R software was used for statistical analysis. The quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (Supplementary Table 5). We included 6 studies with a total of 1,171 patients. Our analysis showed decreased odds of multiple outcomes with statistically significant results, including target vessel revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, confidence interval [CI] 0.19 to 0.57), target vessel failure (OR 0.30, CI 0.09 to 0.99), target lesion revascularization (OR 0.22, CI 0.10 to 0.46), restenosis (OR 0.1343, CI 0.06 to 0.27), and major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.2 CI 0.12 to 0.37). Although myocardial infraction and all-cause mortality showed decreased odds with all-cause mortality at 0.8 (95% CI 0.363 to 2.09), and myocardial infarction at 0.6 (95% CI 0.0349 to 1.07), the reductions did not reach statistical significance. Our analysis by scrutinizing 6 randomized controlled trials favored drug-coated balloons over plain old balloon angioplasty. However, extensive research for deeper understanding cannot be overemphasized.

Alterations in metabolome and lipidome in patients with in-stent restenosis.

CONTEXT: In-stent restenosis (ISR) can lead to blood flow obstruction, insufficient blood supply to the brain, and may even result in serious complications such as stroke. Endothelial cell hyperproliferation and thrombosis are the primary etiologies, frequently resulting in alterations in intravascular metabolism. However, the metabolic changes related to this process are still undermined. OBJECTIVE: We tried to characterize the serum metabolome of patients with ISR and those with non-restenosis (NR) using metabolomics and lipidomics, exploring the key metabolic pathways of this pathological phenomenon. RESULTS: We observed that the cysteine and methionine pathways, which are associated with cell growth and oxidative homeostasis, showed the greatest increase in the ISR group compared to the NR group. Within this pathway, the levels of N-formyl-l-methionine and L-methionine significantly increased in the ISR group, along with elevated levels of downstream metabolites such as 2-ketobutyric acid, pyruvate, and taurocholate. Additionally, an increase in phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylserine (PS), as well as a decrease in triacylglycerol in the ISR group, indicated active lipid metabolism in these patients, which could be a significant factor contributing to the recurrence of blood clots after stent placement. Importantly, phenol sulfate and PS(38:4) were identified as potential biomarkers for distinguishing ISR, with an area under the curve of more than 0.85. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed significant metabolic alterations in patients with ISR, particularly in the cysteine and methionine pathways, with phenol sulfate and PS(38:4) showing promise for ISR identification.

Outcomes With Limus- vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the outcomes with limus drug-coated balloons (DCBs) vs paclitaxel DCBs were small and underpowered for clinical endpoints. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes with limus DCBs vs paclitaxel DCBs for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: An electronic search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed through January 2024 for RCTs comparing limus DCBs vs paclitaxel DCBs for PCI. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were late angiographic findings. Summary estimates were constructed using a random effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 821 patients were included; 446 patients received a limus DCB, and 375 patients received a paclitaxel DCB. There was no difference between limus DCBs and paclitaxel DCBs in the incidence of TLR at a mean of 13.4 months (10.3% vs 7.8%; risk ratio [RR]: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.84-2.08). Subgroup analysis suggested no significant interaction among studies for de novo coronary lesions vs in-stent restenosis (Pinteraction = 0.58). There were no differences in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac mortality, or target vessel myocardial infarction between groups. However, limus DCBs were associated with a higher risk of binary restenosis (RR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.14-3.12), late lumen loss (mean difference = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.28), and a smaller minimum lumen diameter (mean difference = -0.12; 95% CI: -0.22 to -0.02) at late follow-up. In addition, late lumen enlargement occurred more frequently (50% vs 27.5%; RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45-0.77) with paclitaxel DCBs. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing DCB-only PCI, there were no differences in the risk of clinically driven TLR and other clinical outcomes between limus DCBs and paclitaxel DCBs. However, paclitaxel DCBs were associated with better late angiographic outcomes. These findings support the need for future trials to establish the role of new-generation limus DCBs for PCI.

Unravelling the progress and potential of drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons in cardiological insurgencies.

AIM: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality. Though percutaneous transluminal angioplasty followed by stenting is still the default treatment of choice for revascularization of obstructive CAD, the high rate of restenosis compromises the outcomes of endovascular procedures. To overcome restenosis, drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) are designed that release antiproliferative drugs like sirolimus, paclitaxel, everolimus, etc., over time to inhibit cell growth and proliferation. Our review aims to summarize the challenges and progress of DES/DCBs in clinical settings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The comprehensive review, search and selection encompasses in relevant articles through Google Scholar, Springer online, Cochrane library and PubMed that includes research articles, reviews, letters and communications, various viewpoints, meta-analyses, randomized trials and quasi-randomized trials. Several preclinical and clinical data have been included from National Institutes of Health and clinicaltrials.gov websites. KEY FINDINGS: Challenges like delayed endothelialization, stent thrombosis (ST), and inflammation was prominent in first-generation DES. Second-generation DES with improved designs and drug coatings enhanced biocompatibility with fewer complications. Gradual absorption of bioresorbable DES over time mitigated long-term issues associated with permanent implants. Polymer-free DES addressed the inflammation concerns but still, they leave behind metallic stents in the vasculature. As an alternative therapeutic strategy, DCB were developed to minimize inflammation in the vessel. Although both DES and DCBs have shown considerable progress, challenges persist. SIGNIFICANCE: This review illustrates the advancements in the designs, preparation technologies, biodegradable materials, and drugs used as well as challenges associated with DES and DCBs in clinical settings.

Comparative efficacy of drug-eluting balloon and drug-eluting stent for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of drug-eluting stents and drug-eluting balloons in treating in-stent restenosis. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted from January to February 2022, and comprised literature search on PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases with relevant key words to locate randomised controlled trials and observational studies published between 2000 and 2022 that compared drugeluting balloons and drug-eluting stents in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke and target vessel revascularisation. The pooled risk ratio for each outcome was analysed. Data was analysed using Review Manager 5.1. RESULTS: Of the 1,105 studies identified, 11(0.99%) were analysed in detail; 7(63.6%) randomised controlled trials and 4(36.4%) observational studies. There were 2,437 patients with in-stent restenosis. There was no significant difference between drug-eluting balloons and drugeluting stents with respect to all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stroke, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events (p>0.05). Drug-eluting stents significantly caused more target vessel revascularisation compared to drugeluting balloons (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Except for target vessel revascularisation, the drug-eluting balloons and drug-eluting stents had no difference in terms of clinical outcomes related to in-stent restenosis patients.

A espessura da gordura epicárdica está associada à restenose de stent coronariano? Uma revisão sistemática e metanálise / Is epicardial fat thickness associated with coronary stent restenosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUÇÃO: Os fatores relacionados ao paciente que contribuem para a restenose do stent ainda não estão claros. A espessura da gordura epicárdica é proposta como um marcador potencial para pacientes de maior risco. MÉTODOS: Realizamos uma revisão sistemática e metanálise comparando a média da espessura da gordura medida por ecocardiografia em pacientes que desenvolveram versus pacientes que não desenvolveram restenose intrastent durante o acompanhamento após intervenção coronariana percutânea. Foram pesquisados PubMed, Cochrane e Embase. Um modelo de efeitos aleatórios foi usado para calcular as diferenças médias (MDs), com intervalos de confiança (IC) de 95%. As análises estatísticas foram realizadas usando o Review Manager 5.4.1. RESULTADOS: Quatro estudos observacionais compreendendo 820 pacientes foram incluídos, dos quais 61,3% eram do sexo masculino e 25,6% desenvolveram restenose; a idade média variou de 57,6 a 63,0 anos. O período médio de acompanhamento foi de 12 meses. A espessura média da gordura epicárdica variou de 3,8 a 10,4 mm no grupo de restenose e de 3,2 a 7,9 mm no grupo sem restenose. Pacientes que desenvolveram restenose do stent coronariano durante o acompanhamento mostraram uma espessura basal significativamente maior da gordura epicárdica do que aqueles sem restenose (MD = 1,02 mm; IC 95% 0,23; 1,80; p= 0,01). CONCLUSÃO: Nossos resultados apontam para uma associação significativa entre o aumento da espessura da gordura epicárdica e a incidência de restenose intrastent coronariana. Dada a possível relevância prognóstica dessa medida, recomendamos sua consideração para inclusão nos relatórios de exames, especialmente em pacientes com doença aterosclerótica.