Endothelin Level in Menopausal Women with Comorbidity of the Acute Phase Middle Severity COVID-19 with Arterial Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

The levels of endothelins were assessed in menopausal women with arterial hypertension (AH) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the acute phase of the moderate COVID-19. Women under observation (age 45-69 years) were divided into two groups. Control group consisted of women (n=16) who did not have COVID-19, were not vaccinated, and had no antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (IgG). The main group included women (n=63) in the acute phase of the moderate COVID-19 accompanied by pneumonia. According to the clinical and anamnestic data analysis, the main group was divided into subgroups: without AH and T2DM (n=21); with AH and without T2DM (n=32); and with AH and T2DM (n=10). The parameters of clinical blood analysis, as well as endothelin-1, endothelin-2, and endothelin-3 levels were assessed. In women with a moderate COVID-19, the endothelin-1 and endothelin-2 levels were increased compared to the control regardless of AH and T2DM status. We found no statistically significant differences in the studied parameters of endothelial dysfunction between the subgroups of menopausal women in the acute phase of the moderate COVID-19.

Early trajectories of virological and immunological biomarkers and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to hospital for COVID-19: an international, prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Serial measurement of virological and immunological biomarkers in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 can give valuable insight into the pathogenic roles of viral replication and immune dysregulation. We aimed to characterise biomarker trajectories and their associations with clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this international, prospective cohort study, patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 and enrolled in the Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 platform trial within the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines programme between Aug 5, 2020 and Sept 30, 2021 were included. Participants were included from 108 sites in Denmark, Greece, Poland, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Uganda, the UK, and the USA, and randomised to placebo or one of four neutralising monoclonal antibodies: bamlanivimab (Aug 5 to Oct 13, 2020), sotrovimab (Dec 16, 2020, to March 1, 2021), amubarvimab-romlusevimab (Dec 16, 2020, to March 1, 2021), and tixagevimab-cilgavimab (Feb 10 to Sept 30, 2021). This trial included an analysis of 2149 participants with plasma nucleocapsid antigen, anti-nucleocapsid antibody, C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, and D-dimer measured at baseline and day 1, day 3, and day 5 of enrolment. Day-90 follow-up status was available for 1790 participants. Biomarker trajectories were evaluated for associations with baseline characteristics, a 7-day pulmonary ordinal outcome, 90-day mortality, and 90-day rate of sustained recovery. FINDINGS: The study included 2149 participants. Participant median age was 57 years (IQR 46-68), 1246 (58·0%) of 2149 participants were male and 903 (42·0%) were female; 1792 (83·4%) had at least one comorbidity, and 1764 (82·1%) were unvaccinated. Mortality to day 90 was 172 (8·0%) of 2149 and 189 (8·8%) participants had sustained recovery. A pattern of less favourable trajectories of low anti-nucleocapsid antibody, high plasma nucleocapsid antigen, and high inflammatory markers over the first 5 days was observed for high-risk baseline clinical characteristics or factors related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. For example, participants with chronic kidney disease demonstrated plasma nucleocapsid antigen 424% higher (95% CI 319-559), CRP 174% higher (150-202), IL-6 173% higher (144-208), D-dimer 149% higher (134-165), and anti-nucleocapsid antibody 39% lower (60-18) to day 5 than those without chronic kidney disease. Participants in the highest quartile for plasma nucleocapsid antigen, CRP, and IL-6 at baseline and day 5 had worse clinical outcomes, including 90-day all-cause mortality (plasma nucleocapsid antigen hazard ratio (HR) 4·50 (95% CI 3·29-6·15), CRP HR 3·37 (2·30-4·94), and IL-6 HR 5·67 (4·12-7·80). This risk persisted for plasma nucleocapsid antigen and CRP after adjustment for baseline biomarker values and other baseline factors. INTERPRETATION: Patients admitted to hospital with less favourable 5-day biomarker trajectories had worse prognosis, suggesting that persistent viral burden might drive inflammation in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, identifying patients that might benefit from escalation of antiviral or anti-inflammatory treatment. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.

Platelet and Monocyte Microvesicles as Potential Biomarkers of COVID-19 Severity: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) induces inflammation, coagulopathy following platelet and monocyte activation, and fibrinolysis, resulting in elevated D-dimer levels. Activated platelets and monocytes produce microvesicles (MVs). We analyzed the differences in platelet and monocyte MV counts in mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19, as well as their correlation with D-dimer levels. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, blood specimens were collected from 90 COVID-19 patients and analyzed for D-dimers using SYSMEX CS-2500. Platelet MVs (PMVs; PMVCD42b+ and PMVCD41a+), monocyte MVs (MMVs; MMVCD14+), and phosphatidylserine-binding annexin V (PS, AnnV+) were analyzed using a BD FACSCalibur instrument. Results: PMV and MMV counts were significantly increased in COVID-19 patients. AnnV+ PMVCD42b+ and AnnV+ PMVCD41a+ cell counts were higher in patients with severe COVID-19 than in those with moderate clinical symptoms. The median (range) of AnnV+ PMVCD42b+ (MV/µL) in mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 was 1,118.3 (328.1-1,910.5), 937.4 (311.4-2,909.5), and 1,298.8 (458.2-9,703.5), respectively (P =0.009). The median (range) for AnnV+ PMVCD41a+ (MV/µL) in mild, moderate, and severe disease was 885.5 (346.3-1,682.7), 663.5 (233.8-2,081.5), and 1,146.3 (333.3-10,296.6), respectively (P =0.007). D-dimer levels (ng/mL) weak correlated with AnnV+ PMVCD41a+ (P =0.047, r=0.258). Conclusions: PMV PMVCD42b+ and PMVCD41a+ counts were significantly increased in patients with severe clinical symptoms, and PMVCD41a+ counts correlated with D-dimer levels. Therefore, MV counts can be used as a potential biomarker of COVID-19 severity.

Value of increased soluble suppressor tumorigenicity biomarker 2 (sST2) on admission as an indicator of severity in patients with COVID-19 / Valor del aumento del biomarcador supresor soluble de tumorigenicidad 2 (sST2) al ingreso como indicador de gravedad en pacientes con COVID-19

Background Soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) is a biomarker for heart failure and pulmonary injury. We hypothesize that sST2 could help predict severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Methods sST2 was analyzed in patients consecutively admitted for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Other prognostic markers were also measured. In-hospital complications were registered, including death, ICU admission, and respiratory support requirements. Results 495 patients were studied (53% male, age: 57.6±17.6). At admission, median sST2 concentrations was 48.5ng/mL [IQR, 30.6–83.1ng/mL] and correlated with male gender, older age, comorbidities, other severity biomarkers, and respiratory support requirements. sST2 levels were higher in patients who died (n=45, 9.1%) (45.6 [28.0, 75.9]ng/mL vs. 144 [82.6, 319] ng/mL, p<0.001) and those admitted to ICU (n=46, 9.3%) (44.7 [27.5, 71.3] ng/mL vs. 125 [69.0, 262]ng/mL, p<0.001). sST2 levels>210ng/mL were a strong predictor of complicated in-hospital courses, with higher risk of death (OR, 39.3, CI95% 15.9, 103) and death/ICU (OR 38.3, CI95% 16.3–97.5) after adjusting for all other risk factors. The addition of sST2 enhanced the predictive capacity of mortality risk models. Conclusions sST2 represents a robust severity predictor in COVID-19 and could be an important tool for identifying at-risk patients who may benefit from closer follow-up and specific therapies (AU)

Antecedentes El supresor soluble de tumorigenicidad 2 (sST2) es un biomarcador de insuficiencia cardiaca y daño pulmonar. Nuestra hipótesis es que la determinación de sST2 al ingreso podría ayudar a predecir la gravedad de la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Métodos Se analizó la concentración de sST2 en pacientes ingresados por neumonía por SARS-CoV-2, junto con otros biomarcadores pronósticos conocidos. Asimismo, se registraron las complicaciones durante la estancia hospitalaria, incluidas la muerte, el ingreso en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) y los requerimientos de soporte respiratorio. Resultados Se estudiaron 495 pacientes (53% hombres, edad 57,6 ± 17,6). Al ingreso, la mediana de la concentración de sST2 fue 48,5 ng/mL (índice intercuartílico [IQR] 30,6-83,1 ng/mL) y correlacionó con el género masculino, una mayor edad, comorbilidades, otros biomarcadores de gravedad, así como necesidad de soporte respiratorio. Los niveles de sST2 fueron mayores en pacientes que fallecieron (n = 45, 9,1%) (45,6 [28,0, 75,9] ng/mL vs. 144 [82,6, 319] ng/mL, p < 0,001) y aquellos que requirieron ingreso en UCI (n = 46, 9,3%) (44,7 [27,5, 71,3] ng/mL vs. 125 [69,0, 262] ng/mL, p < 0,001). Así, los valores de sST2 > 210 ng/mL se han demostrado como un fuerte predictor de complicaciones, con un mayor riesgo de fallecimiento (odds ratio [OR], 39,3, intervalo de confianza [IC] 95% 15,9, 103) y fallecimiento o ingreso en UCI (OR 38,3, IC 95% 16,3-97,5), tras el ajuste por todos los demás factores de riesgo. La adición de la determinación de los niveles de sST2 mejoró la potencia predictiva de los modelos de riesgo desarrollados. Conclusiones El sST2 representa un predictor robusto de la gravedad en pacientes con COVID-19 y podría convertirse en una herramienta importante para la identificación de pacientes en riesgo que podrían beneficiarse de un mayor seguimiento y terapias específicas (AU)

High serum nitrates levels in non-survivor COVID-19 patients / Altas concentraciones séricas de nitratos en pacientes fallecidos por COVID-19

Objective: Higher blood nitrate and nitrite levels have been found in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients than in healthy subjects. The present study explores the potential association between serum nitrate levels and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Design: A prospective observation study was carried out. Setting: Eight Intensive Care Units (ICUs) from 6 hospitals in the Canary Islands (Spain). Patients: COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. Interventions: Determination of serum nitrate levels at ICU admission. Main variable of interest: Mortality at 30 days. Results: Non-surviving (n=11) compared to surviving patients (n=42) showed higher APACHE-II (p<0.001) and SOFA scores (p=0.004), and higher serum nitrate levels (p=0.001). Logistic regression analyses showed serum nitrate levels to be associated to 30-day mortality after controlling for SOFA (OR=1.021; 95%CI=1.006–1.036; p=0.01) or APACHE-II (OR=1.023; 95%CI=1.006–1.041; p=0.01). There were no differences in the area under the curve (AUC) for mortality prediction by serum nitrate levels (AUC=83%; 95%CI=73–92%; p<0.001), APACHE II (AUC=85%; 95%CI=75–96%; p<0.001) and SOFA (AUC=78%; 95%CI=63–92%; p=0.005) based on the DeLong method. The Kaplan–Meier analysis found patients with serum nitrates levels>68.4μmol/l to have a higher mortality rate (hazard ratio=138.8; 95%CI=22.3–863.9; p<0.001). Conclusions: The main novel finding was the association between serum nitrate levels and mortality in COVID-19 patients controlling for the SOFA or APACHE-II scores, though larger studies are needed to confirm this observation (AU)

Objetivo: Se han encontrado niveles más elevados de nitratos en la sangre de pacientes con enfermedad del coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) que en sujetos sanos. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de estudio consistió en explorar la posible asociación entre los niveles séricos de nitratos y la mortalidad de pacientes por COVID-19. Diseño: Estudio observacional y prospectivo. Ámbito: Ocho unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) de 6 hospitales de las Islas Canarias (España). Pacientes: Pacientes COVID-19 ingresados en la UCI. Intervenciones: Se midieron los niveles séricos de nitratos al ingreso en la UCI. Variable de interés principal: Mortalidad a los 30 días. Resultados: Los pacientes fallecidos (n=11) comparados con los supervivientes (n=42) presentaron mayores APACHE-II (p<0,001), SOFA (p=0,004) y niveles séricos de nitratos (p=0,001). Los análisis de regresión logística mostraron una asociación entre los niveles séricos de nitratos al ingreso en la UCI y la mortalidad a los 30 días controlando por SOFA (OR:1.021; IC 95%:1.006-1.036; p=0,01) o APACHE-II (OR:1.023; IC 95%:1.006-1.041; p=0,01). No encontramos diferencias en el área bajo la curva (ABC) para la predicción de mortalidad entre los niveles séricos de nitratos (ABC:83%; IC 95%:73-92%; p<0,001), APACHE-II (ABC:85%; IC 95%:75-96%; p<0,001) y SOFA (ABC:78%; IC 95%:63-92%; p=0,005) con el método de DeLong. El análisis de Kaplan-Meier mostró que los pacientes que tenían niveles séricos de nitratos al ingreso en la UCI>68,4μmol/l presentaban mayor riesgo de fallecer (hazard ratio:138,8; IC 95%:22,3-863,9; p<0,001). Conclusiones: El principal nuevo hallazgo fue la asociación entre los niveles séricos de nitratos y la mortalidad de pacientes COVID-19 controlando por SOFA o APACHE-II; pero estudios de mayor tamaño muestral son necesarios para confirmar este resultado (AU)

Marcadores y seguimiento tras alta de urgencias en neumonías COVID-19 / Biological markers and follow-up after discharge home of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

Objetivos: Analizar la evolución de los pacientes que fueron dados de alta del servicio de urgencias (SU) con neumonía compatible con COVID-19. Método: Se realiza el seguimiento de 102 pacientes dados de alta desde SU con diagnóstico de neumonía compatible con COVID-19 entre el 12 y el 21 de marzo de 2020 en un hospital del sur de Madrid. Se describen las principales variables utilizando mediana e intervalo intercuartil o usando frecuencias, según corresponda. La comparación entre tratamientos/pronóstico se realizó utilizando el test ji cuadrado, el test de Kruskal Wallis o el test de Mann-Whitney. Finalmente, se realizó un modelo de regresión logística. Resultados: La mayoría de los pacientes (74,5%) fueron tratados con hidroxicloroquina en monoterapia. La tasa de reingreso fue de 15,7% y de revisita a urgencias de 25,7%. El ingreso se relacionó con un LDL (lactato deshidrogena-sa) elevado (p = 0,011), creatincinasa (CK) elevada (p = 0,004) y linfopenia (p = 0,034). La hipertensión y la enferme-dad pulmonar obstructiva crónica se relacionaron con el ingreso, y la cardiopatía isquémica fue la comorbilidad que se asoció a mayor duración de la sintomatología. Conclusión: La linfopenia, LDH y CK pronosticaron mejor la necesidad de ingreso que otros marcadores clásicos en pacientes con clínica leve-moderada. El seguimiento telefónico demostró ser de utilidad ante la sobrecarga de recursos sanitarios. (AU)

Background and objective: We aimed to analyze the clinical course of patients discharged from our emergency departament (ED) with pneumonia symptoms compatible with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Methods: We followed 102 patients discharged home with a diagnosis of pneumonia compatible with COVID19 between March 12 and 21, 2020, in our hospital in the southern part of the autonomous community of Madrid. Descriptive statistics (medians and interquartile ranges or frequencies, as appropriate) were compiled for the main variables. Treatments and prognoses were compared with c2, Kruskal–Wallis, or Mann–Whitney tests. The data then underwent logistic regression analysis. Results: Most patients (accounting for 74.5% of the discharges) were treated with hydroxychloroquine alone. The readmission rate was 15.7%; the ED revisiting rate was 25.7%. Admission was associated with an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (P=.011), elevated creatine kinase (CK) (P=.004), and lymphopenia (P=.034). Hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were also related to admission. Ischemic heart disease was associated with longer duration of symptoms. Conclusions: Lymphopenia, and elevated LDH and CK levels predicted the need for hospital admission better than other traditional biological markers in patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Telephone follow-up proved useful for dealing with the overloading of health care services. (AU)

Aprendiendo sobre anticoagulación con la COVID-19 / Learning about anticoagulation with COVID-19

No disponible

Relación entre los niveles de interleucina 6 y depresión en pacientes afectados por Covid-19 / Interleukin 6 and depression in patients affected by Covid-19

Introducción: El incremento de citocinas centrales resultante de infecciones produce cambios neuronales. La Covid-19 permite estudiar los síntomas depresivos en un estrés sostenido y su relación con mecanismos moleculares.ObjetivosValorar la correlación entre niveles de IL-6, IL-1β y TNF-α y sintomatología depresiva. Caracterizar los cuadros depresivos presentes.MétodosEstudio observacional. Se incluyeron pacientes ingresados por Covid-19 mayores de 60años con una determinación de interleucinas. Se utilizó la Escala de depresión geriátrica de Yesavage (GDS), asociándose cada ítem con un neurotransmisor.ResultadosSe incluyeron 27 pacientes. No encontramos correlación entre los niveles de IL-6 y la puntuación de la escala GDS (rho=0,204; IC95% −0,192 a 0,543); ni con los niveles de IL-1β (rho=−0,126; IC95% −0,490 a 0,276); ni de TNF-α (rho=−0,033; IC95% −0,416 a 0,360). Tres pacientes (11,1%) presentaron una puntuación compatible con cuadro depresivo. Se asoció a déficit de noradrenalina y serotonina.ConclusionesNo hallamos correlación entre los niveles de IL-6, IL-1β y TNF-α con la puntuación en la GDS. La sintomatología depresiva presenta características similares a las depresiones vasculares. (AU)

Introduction: Rise of central cytokines resulting from infections produces neuronal changes. Covid-19 allows the study of depressive symptoms in sustained stress and its relationship with molecular mechanisms.ObjectivesTo assess correlation between IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α and depressive symptoms. Characterize the depressive symptoms present.MethodsObservational study. Patients admitted for Covid-19 older than 60 years with a interleukin determination were included. The Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) was used, associating each item with a neurotransmitter.Results27 patients included. We did not find correlation between IL-6 levels and the GDS scale score (rho=0.204; 95% CI −0.192 to 0.543); with IL-1β levels (rho=−0.126; 95% CI −0.490 to 0.276); nor of TNF-α (rho=−0.033; 95% CI −0.416 to 0.360). 3 patients (11.1%) presented score compatible with depressive disorder. It was associated with a deficiency of noradrenaline and serotonin.ConclusionsWe found no correlation between the levels of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α with the GDS score. Depressive symptomatology is similar to vascular depressions. (AU)

Presencia de anticuerpos antifosfolipidos IgA en pacientes con lesiones pernioticas asociadas a COVID 19 / Immunoglobulin A Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients With Chilblain-like Lesions During the COVID-19 Pandemic

No disponible

Revisión sistemática sobre la utilidad pronóstica del dímero-D, coagulación intravascular diseminada y tratamiento anticoagulante en pacientes graves con COVID-19 / Systematic review of the prognostic utility of D-dimer, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and anticoagulant therapy in COVID-19 critically ill patient

Durante la nueva pandemia causada por SARS-CoV-2 existe poca evidencia con relación a varios aspectos de la enfermedad, como es el caso de la coagulopatía e interpretación de los niveles de dímero D, su asociación con la coagulación intravascular diseminada (CID) y la controversia en cuanto al beneficio de la anticoagulación. Por ello, se ha hecho una revisión sistemática para definir el rol del dímero D en la enfermedad, la prevalencia y valor pronóstico de la CID y la utilidad del tratamiento anticoagulante en dichos pacientes. Se abordó una búsqueda bibliográfica y análisis de la literatura sobre pacientes con COVID-19. Se elaboraron 4 recomendaciones basadas en la opinión de expertos y en el conocimiento científico, según el sistema Grading of Recommendations Assesment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). La presente revisión en pacientes con COVID-19 indica la presencia de mayor nivel de dímero D en aquellos con peor pronóstico, que puede haber un sobrediagnóstico de CID en el curso de la enfermedad y que no existe evidencia sobre el beneficio de iniciar tratamiento anticoagulante basándose únicamente en datos aislados de laboratorio

During the new pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, there is short knowledge regarding the management of different disease areas, such as coagulopathy and interpretation of D-dimer levels, its association with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and controversy about the benefit of anticoagulation. Thus, a systematic review has been performed to define the role of D-dimer in the disease, the prevalence of DIC and the usefulness of anticoagulant treatment in these patients. A literature search was performed to analyze the studies of COVID-19 patients. Four recommendations were drawn based on expert opinion and scientific knowledge, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The present review suggests the presence of higher levels of D-dimer in those with worse prognosis, there may be an overdiagnosis of DIC in the course of the disease and there is no evidence on the benefit of starting anticoagulant treatment based only on isolated laboratory data

The Value of C-Reactive Protein-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting the Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia / Valor del ratio proteína C-reactiva-linfocitos para predecir la gravedad de la neumonía causada por SARS-CoV-2

No disponible

Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency and COVID-19 Infection / Deficiencia de Alfa-1 antitripsina e infección por COVID-19

No disponible

Serum Concentrations of Interleukin 6 in the General Adult Population: Possible Implications for Anti-IL-6 Therapy in SARS-Cov-2 Infection and IL-6-Related Diseases

No disponible

Anti-IL-6 receptor antibody treatment for severe COVID-19 and the potential implication of IL-6 gene polymorphisms in novel coronavirus pneumonia / Tratamiento con anticuerpos anti-receptor de IL-6 para COVID-19 grave y la posible implicación de polimorfismos del gen IL-6 en la nueva neumonía por coronavirus

No disponible

Diagnóstico microbiológico de la COVID-19 / Microbiological diagnosis of COVID-19

El diagnóstico microbiológico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 es de gran importancia por su repercusión clínica a nivel individual y para la elaboración de estrategias de salud pública para intentar frenar su propagación. Actualmente la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa con transcriptasa inversa (RT-PCR) es la técnica de elección para el diagnóstico microbiológico del paciente sintomático por COVID-19, detectando material genético del virus en el organismo. Requiere un adecuado manejo de las muestras y un laboratorio bien equipado. Otros métodos diagnósticos utilizados son la detección de anticuerpos generados por el individuo en contacto con el virus, son útiles para el estudio de infección pasada, estudios de vacunas o estrategias epidemiológicas; y la detección de antígenos del SARS-CoV-2 en muestras biológicas, de mayor rentabilidad, menor coste y gran especificidad, pero con altas tasas de falsos negativos en pacientes con baja carga viral. Es fundamental una correcta indicación e interpretación de las pruebas diagnósticas para su mayor rentabilidad

Microbiological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial due to its clinical repercussion at the individual level and for the development of public health strategies to try to stop its spread. Currently, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for microbiological diagnosis of symptomatic COVID-19 patients, detecting genetic material of the virus in the body. It requires proper sample handling and a well-equipped laboratory. Other diagnostic methods used are the detection of antibodies generated by the individual in contact with the virus, useful for the study of past infection, vaccine studies or epidemiological strategies; and the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigens in biological samples, with greater profitability, lower cost and high specificity, but with high rates of false negatives in patients with low viral load. Correct indication and interpretation of diagnostic tests is essential for greater profitability

Infección y trombosis asociada a la COVID-19: posible papel del grupo sanguíneo ABO / Infection and thrombosis associated with COVID-19: Possible role of the ABO blood group

INTRODUCCIÓN: La infección por SARS-CoV-2 presenta gran heterogeneidad clínica, desde asintomática hasta cuadros clínicos graves con un desenlace fatal. Algunos autores refieren el grupo sanguíneo ABO como posible marcador biológico de susceptibilidad para la enfermedad. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Se ha recogido a los pacientes ingresados con infección por COVID-19 y se ha analizado la incidencia por grupos en relación con la base poblacional de la Comunidad Foral de Navarra, así como sus principales complicaciones y evolución. RESULTADOS: Los pacientes de grupo O ingresados con infección por COVID-19 son proporcionalmente menos respecto a la base poblacional, sin ser la diferencia estadísticamente significativa. Los grupos AB y B son un 38% más en el grupo de infectados que en la población. El grupo B ha presentado significación estadística en cuanto al número de complicaciones trombóticas junto con mayor tasa de ingreso en unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. CONCLUSIÓN: El estudio sugiere menor susceptibilidad a la infección de los pacientes de grupos O y mayor riesgo de complicaciones en el grupo B. Hacen falta estudios con mayor tamaño muestral para poder obtener resultados significativos

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection is clinically very heterogeneous, varying from asymptomatic to severe clinical conditions with a fatal outcome. Some studies suggests that the ABO blood group could be a biological marker of susceptibility for the development of the disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data from patients admitted with COVID-19 infection who had ABO blood group recorded, and analyzed the incidence by groups, compared with the global population in Navarre, as well as their main complications and evolution. RESULTS: Group O was proportionally less represented in the hospitalized patients with respect to the global population, although the difference was not statistically significant. Group B had significantly higher rates of thrombotic complications and required more admissions in intensive care units. CONCLUSION: The study suggests a lower susceptibility to infection in group O and a higher risk of complications in group B. Studies with a larger sample size are required in order to obtain significant results

Trombosis sistémica producida por COVID-19 / COVID-19 induced systemic thrombosis

No disponible

Papel de la hemodiálisis extendida en COVID-19: a propósito de un caso / Role of expanded hemodialysis in COVID-19: a case report

No disponible

Coagulopatía y covid-19. recomendaciones para una realidad cambiante / Coagulopathy and COVID-19. Recommendations for a changing reality

Resumen La pandemia COVID-19 provocada por el betacoronavirus SARS-CoV-2 exige rápidas respuestas desde el campo de la medicina. El riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso y arterial está aumentado durante la infección, especialmente en pacientes críticos. En ese contexto se destaca una coagulopatía caracterizada por niveles elevados de dímero D, con tendencia a la falla multiorgánica, y aumento de la mortalidad. Esas anormalidades de la hemostasia responden a varios mecanismos que deben tenerse en cuenta para la toma de decisiones terapéuticas. Analizamos la evidencia científica disponible en la que se fundamenta el enfoque terapéutico de la coagulopatía descripta y sus complicaciones, con el objetivo de diseñar recomendaciones terapéuticas realistas tendientes a disminuir la morbilidad y la mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19.

Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic requires rapid medical responses. The risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism increases in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. There is a hypercoagulable state that includes elevated levels of D-dimer, with an increased risk of organ failure and increased mortality. The abnormalities described in hemostasis should be considered for therapeutic decision making. We analyzed the available scientific evidence for the therapeutic approach of coagulopathy in the course of the disease with the objective of designing realistic therapeutic recommendations aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19.

Fungal co-infection in COVID-19 patients: should we be concerned? / Coinfección fúngica en pacientes con COVID-19: ¿debemos preocuparnos?

Critically ill COVID-19 patients have higher pro-inflammatory (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, tumor necrosis alpha) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4, IL-10) cytokine levels, less CD4 interferon-gamma expression, and fewer CD4 and CD8 cells. This severe clinical situation increases the risk of serious fungal infections, such as invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, invasive candidiasis or Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. However, few studies have investigated fungal coinfections in this population. We describe an update on published reports on fungal coinfections and our personal experience in three Spanish hospitals. We can conclude that despite the serious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 in many patients, the scarcity of invasive mycoses is probably due to the few bronchoscopies and necropsies performed in these patients because of the high risk in aerosol generation. However, the presence of fungal markers in clinically relevant specimens, with the exception of bronchopulmonary colonization by Candida, should make it advisable to early implement antifungal therapy

Los pacientes gravemente enfermos con COVID-19 presentan concentraciones más elevadas de citoquinas pro-inflamatorias (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6 y factor de necrosis tumoral alfa) y anti-inflamatorias (IL-4 e IL-10), menor expresión de interferón-gama y un número más bajo de células CD4 y CD8. Esta grave situación clínica aumenta el riesgo de padecer coinfecciones fúngicas, como la aspergilosis pulmonar invasora, la candidiasis invasora o la neumonía por Pneumocystis jirovecii. Sin embargo, pocos estudios han investigado las coinfecciones fúngicas en esta población. En esta revisión describimos una actualización de las publicaciones sobre coinfecciones fúngicas en esta población de pacientes y nuestra experiencia personal en tres hospitales españoles. Podemos concluir que a pesar de la grave enfermedad causada por el SARS-CoV-2 en muchos pacientes, la baja frecuencia de micosis invasoras se debe probablemente a las pocas broncoscopias y necropsias realizadas en estos pacientes debido al alto riesgo de producción de aerosoles. Sin embargo, la presencia de marcadores fúngicos en muestras clínicas relevantes, con la excepción de la colonización broncopulmonar por Candida, debería aconsejar la instauración precoz de una terapia antifúngica