ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Cognitive Change Index (CCI-20) is a validated questionnaire that assesses subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) across memory, language, and executive domains. We aimed to: (a) examine the internal consistency and construct validity of the CCI-20 in patients with movement disorders and (b) learn how the CCI-20 corresponds to objective neuropsychological and mood performance in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET) seeking deep brain stimulation (DBS). METHODS: 216 participants (N = 149 PD; N = 67 ET) underwent neuropsychological evaluation and received the CCI-20. The proposed domains of the CCI-20 were examined via confirmatory (CFA) and exploratory (EFA) factor analyses. Hierarchical regressions were used to assess the relationship among subjective cognitive complaints, neuropsychological performance and mood symptoms. RESULTS: PD and ET groups were similar across neuropsychological, mood, and CCI-20 scores and were combined into one group who was well educated (m = 15.01 ± 2.92), in their mid-60's (m = 67.72 ± 9.33), predominantly male (63%), and non-Hispanic White (93.6%). Previously proposed 3-domain CCI-20 model failed to achieve adequate fit. Subsequent EFA revealed two CCI-20 factors: memory and non-memory (p < 0.001; CFI = 0.924). Regressions indicated apathy and depressive symptoms were associated with greater memory and total cognitive complaints, while poor executive function and anxiety were associated with more non-memory complaints. CONCLUSION: Two distinct dimensions were identified in the CCI-20: memory and non-memory complaints. Non-memory complaints were indicative of worse executive function, consistent with PD and ET cognitive profiles. Mood significantly contributed to all CCI-20 dimensions. Future studies should explore the utility of SCCs in predicting cognitive decline in these populations.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Deep Brain Stimulation , Essential Tremor , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Male , Female , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Essential Tremor/complications , Essential Tremor/therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Neuropsychological Tests , Cognition/physiology , PerceptionABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment depends on several factors, including proper patient selection, accurate electrode placement, and adequate stimulation settings. Another factor that may impact long-term satisfaction and therapy outcomes is the type of implantable pulse generator (IPG) used: rechargeable or non-rechargeable. However, there are currently no guidelines on the choice of IPG type. The present study investigates the current practices, opinions, and factors DBS clinicians consider when choosing an IPG for their patients. METHODS: Between December 2021 and June 2022, we sent a structured questionnaire with 42 questions to DBS experts of two international, functional neurosurgery societies. The questionnaire included a rating scale where participants could rate the factors influencing their choice of IPG type and their satisfaction with certain IPG aspects. Additionally, we presented four clinical case scenarios to assess preference of choice of IPG-type in each case. RESULTS: Eighty-seven participants from 30 different countries completed the questionnaire. The three most relevant factors for IPG choice were "existing social support," "cognitive status," and "patient age." Most participants believed that patients valued avoiding repetitive replacement surgeries more than the burden of regularly recharging the IPG. Participants reported that they implanted the same amount of rechargeable as non-rechargeable IPGs for primary DBS insertions and 20% converted non-rechargeable to rechargeable IPGs during IPG replacements. Most participants estimated that rechargeable was the more cost-effective option. CONCLUSION: This present study shows that the decision-making of the choice of IPG is very individualized. We identified the key factors influencing the physician's choice of IPG. Compared to patient-centric studies, clinicians may value different aspects. Therefore, clinicians should rely not only on their opinion but also counsel patients on different types of IPGs and consider the patient's preferences. Uniform global guidelines on IPG choice may not represent regional or national differences in the healthcare systems.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Humans , Electrodes, Implanted/psychology , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Electric Power Supplies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Background: Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is a technique by which rats press a lever to stimulate their brains through an electrode chronically implanted in brain reward areas. Currently only two laboratories in the world, one in India and one in Spain, are intensively studying the effect of this kind of deep brain stimulation on learning and memory. This paper will present the main findings. Methods: Different groups of young and old healthy and brain-damaged rats with electrodes implanted in the medial forebrain bundle received a treatment of ICSS after being trained in several paradigms of implicit and explicit learning. Memory was tested over short and long-term periods. Structural and molecular post-mortem analyses of their brains were examined in relation to memory results. Results: ICSS enhances implicit and explicit memory, especially in animals showing poor performance in the learning tasks, such as brain-damaged subjects. At the structural and molecular level, ICSS enhances size and dendritic arborization and promotes neurogenesis in specific hippocampal areas. ICSS also regulates the expression of genes related to learning and memory. Conclusions: Through activating reward and neural plasticity mechanisms, ICSS in the medial forebrain bundle is a promising technique for memory-enhancing treatments.(AU)
Antecedentes: La autoestimulación eléctrica intracraneal (AEIC) es un tipo de estimulación cerebral profunda autoadministrada a través de un electrodo implantado de forma crónica en áreas cerebrales de la recompensa. Actualmente, dos laboratorios en el mundo, uno en India y otro en España, están estudiando intensivamente el efecto de este tipo de estimulación cerebral reforzante sobre el aprendizaje y la memoria. Aquí se presentan los principales hallazgos. Métodos: Diferentes grupos de ratas sanas y con daño cerebral, jóvenes y viejas, con electrodos implantados en el haz prosencefálico medial recibieron un tratamiento de AEIC después de ser entrenados en diferentes paradigmas de aprendizaje. La memoria se evaluó a corto y largo plazo. Resultados: La AEIC mejora la memoria implícita y explícita, especialmente en animales con un bajo rendimiento o con daño cerebral. A nivel estructural y molecular, la AEIC estimula del desarrollo de la arborización dendrítica, promueve la neurogénesis en el hipocampo y regula la expresión de genes relacionados con plasticidad, aprendizaje y memoria. Conclusiones: La AEIC en el haz prosencefálico medial, al activar mecanismos de recompensa y de plasticidad neural, constituye un tratamiento prometedor para la mejora de la memoria.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Mice , Self Stimulation , Electric Stimulation , Learning , Medial Forebrain Bundle/physiology , Synaptic Transmission , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Rats , Reward , Memory and Learning Tests , Electrodes , Memory, Long-Term/physiology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Psychology , Repetition PrimingABSTRACT
AIMS: This follow-up study aimed to examine the 8-year efficacy and safety of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in southern China. METHODS: The follow-up data of 10 patients with PD undergoing STN-DBS were analyzed. Motor symptoms were assessed before and 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after the surgery with stimulation-on in both off-medication (off-med) and on-medication (on-med) status using the Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Part III. The quality of life was assessed using the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire. The sleep, cognition, and emotion were evaluated using a series of nonmotor scales. Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) and stimulation parameters were recorded at each follow-up. RESULTS: The motor symptoms were improved by 50.9%, 37.7%, 36.7%, and 37.3% in 1, 3, 5, and 8 years, respectively, in the off-med / stimulation-on status compared with the baseline. The quality of life improved by 39.7% and 56.1% in 1 and 3 years, respectively, but declined to the preoperative level thereafter. The sleep, cognition, and emotion were mostly unchanged. LEDD reduced from 708.1 ± 172.5 mg to 330 ± 207.8 mg in 8 years. The stimulation parameters, including amplitude, pulse width, and frequency, were 2.77 ± 0.49 V, 71.3 ± 12.8 µs, and 121.5 ± 21 Hz, respectively, in 8 years. CONCLUSION: Long-term therapeutic efficacy of STN-DBS could be achieved even with relatively low stimulation intensity and medication dosage for PD patients in southern China. Motor improvement and medication reduction were maintained through the 8-year follow-up, but improvement in quality of life lasted for only 3 years. No definite changes was found in nonmotor symptoms after STN-DBS.
Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Subthalamic Nucleus , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , China , Cognition , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Emotions , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Male , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Quality of Life , Sleep Quality , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Standard treatment of Parkinson's disease involves the dopaminergic medications. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is an important neurosurgical intervention often used as alternative treatment to drug therapy; however, it can be associated with increase of impulsive behaviors. This descriptive review focused on studies investigating the correlation between Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and impulsivity in Parkinson's disease patients, arguing, the action's mechanism and the specific role of the subthalamic nucleus. We searched on PubMed and Web of Science databases and screening references of included studies and review articles for additional citations. From initial 106 studies, only 15 met the search criteria. Parkinson's Disease patients with and without Deep Brain Stimulation were compared with healthy controls, through 16 different tasks that assessed some aspects of impulsivity. Both Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and medication were associated with impulsive behavior and influenced decision-making processes. Moreover, findings demonstrated that: Impulse Control Disorders (ICDs) occurred soon after surgery, while, in pharmacological treatment, they appeared mainly after the initiation of treatment or the increase in dosage, especially with dopamine agonists. The subthalamic nucleus plays a part in the fronto-striato-thalamic-cortical loops mediating motor, cognitive, and emotional functions: this could explain the role of the Deep Brain Stimulation in behavior modulation in Parkinson's Disease patients. Indeed, increase impulsivity has been reported also after deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus independently by dopaminergic medication status.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Impulsive Behavior/physiology , Parkinson Disease/metabolism , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Subthalamic Nucleus/metabolism , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Dopamine/metabolism , Dopamine Agents/pharmacology , Dopamine Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Impulsive Behavior/drug effects , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Subthalamic Nucleus/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation improves motor symptoms and treatment-related complications in patients with Parkinson's disease. However, some patients have trouble adjusting socially after successful neurosurgery, in part because of "unrealistic" expectations and psychiatric disorders. Preoperative psychological interventions focusing on these aspects could be beneficial for such patients. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of 2 psychosocial approaches-1 based on cognitive restructuration and 1 consisting of 2 interviews-with those of a control group without preoperative preparation. All patients underwent a psychometric evaluation 2 months before surgery (M-2) and again at 3 (M+3) and 6 months (M+6) after surgery. The psychometric evaluation focused on social adjustment using the social adjustment scale-self-report. The psychiatric profile of the patients was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 73 patients initially enrolled, 62 performed the initial inclusion visit (M-2) and the 2 postoperative visits (M+3, M+6). For these 62 patients (52% male), the overall mean age was 59 ± 6.13 years, and the mean disease duration was 9.44 ± 3.62 years. No specific differences were observed for social adjustment between the groups or visits (M-2, M+3, M+6); however, an interaction was found in the cognitive restructuration group at M+6 for the family dimension of the social adjustment scale-self-report. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that even if no overall increase in the social adjustment score was observed, patients with Parkinson's disease eligible for neurosurgery should undergo preoperative psychosocial therapy to define their expectations and help them in their psychological restructuration. This type of therapy, complementary to psychoeducation, could represent an opportunity to prevent postoperative deception and social maladjustment.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Parkinson Disease/surgery , Preoperative Care/psychology , Social Adjustment , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Parkinson Disease/rehabilitation , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics , Subthalamic Nucleus , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy and safety of combined bilateral ventralis oralis posterior/ventralis intermedius (Vop/Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of acquired dystonia in children and young adults. Pallidal DBS is efficacious for severe, medication-refractory isolated dystonia, providing 50%-60% long-term improvement. Unfortunately, pallidal stimulation response rates in acquired dystonia are modest and unpredictable, with frequent nonresponders. Acquired dystonia, most commonly caused by cerebral palsy, is more common than isolated dystonia in pediatric populations and is more recalcitrant to standard treatments. Given the limitations of pallidal DBS in acquired dystonia, there is a need to explore alternative brain targets. Preliminary evidence has suggested that thalamic stimulation may be efficacious for acquired dystonia. METHODS: Four participants, 3 with perinatal brain injuries and 1 with postencephalitic symptomatic dystonia, underwent bilateral Vop/Vim DBS and bimonthly evaluations for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS) scores between the baseline and 12-month assessments. Video documentation was used for blinded ratings. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score), quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory [PedsQL] and modified Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II [UPDRS-II] scores), and neuropsychological assessments. Adverse events were monitored for safety. RESULTS: All participants tolerated the procedure well, and there were no safety concerns or serious adverse events. There was an average improvement of 21.5% in the BFMDRS motor subscale score, but the improvement was only 1.6% according to the BADS score. Following blinded video review, dystonia severity ratings were even more modest. Secondary outcomes, however, were more encouraging, with the BFMDRS disability subscale score improving by 15.7%, the PedsQL total score by 27%, and the modified UPDRS-II score by 19.3%. Neuropsychological assessment findings were unchanged 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral thalamic neuromodulation by DBS for severe, medication-refractory acquired dystonia was well tolerated. Primary and secondary outcomes showed highly variable treatment effect sizes comparable to those of pallidal stimulation in this population. As previously described, improvements in quality of life and disability were not reflected in dystonia severity scales, suggesting a need for the development of scales specifically for acquired dystonia.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03078816 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Dystonia/therapy , Thalamus , Adolescent , Brain Injuries/complications , Brain Injuries/surgery , Child , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Disability Evaluation , Dystonia/etiology , Dystonia/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Globus Pallidus , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Ventral Thalamic Nuclei , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a safe and effective alternative treatment of some movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease. Although DBS is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease, because of the necessity of surgical intervention, follow-up and the effects on symptoms, this study was carried out to determine the challenges, expectations and accomplishments of patients with DBS in Parkinson's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was carried out at the Neurosurgery Department of a research hospital in Turkey with seven patients who underwent DBS between 2008 and 2018. In the study, the challenges, expectations, and accomplishments of patients were investigated by using three focus group interviews in October 2018. RESULTS: Among the participants, six patients were male, and one patient was female. The mean age of the patients was 56.85±16.48. Three main themes were revealed in the study. These were (1) Reborn; decrease in dependence, sense of accomplishment, enjoyment of life, (2) Prejudice; perceived as severely ill by others and (3) Fear; not being accustomed to the device, loss of device function. CONCLUSION: The results obtained from this study can be used in the process of adaptation to this process by discussing and evaluating the challenges, expectations and accomplishments of the Parkinson's patient in DBS with healthcare professionals and other patients.
Subject(s)
Attitude , Deep Brain Stimulation , Emotions , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Adult , Aged , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Qualitative Research , Treatment Outcome , TurkeyABSTRACT
When oral dopaminergic medication falls short in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, patients are left with motor response fluctuations and dyskinesias that may have a large impact on functioning in daily life. They may benefit from one of the currently available advanced treatments, namely deep brain stimulation, continuous levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion. The indication, choice between the separate advanced treatments and the timing can be challenging and will be discussed against the background of the progressive nature of the disease, the heterogeneity of disease manifestation and variable patient characteristics.
Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Apomorphine/administration & dosage , Carbidopa/administration & dosage , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Levodopa/administration & dosage , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Dopamine Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Combinations , Humans , Infusions, Subcutaneous/methods , Infusions, Subcutaneous/psychology , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: High-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of anterior thalamic nuclei (ANT) reduces the frequency and intensity of focal and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic epileptic seizures. We investigated the impact of high-frequency ANT-DBS on vigilance in epilepsy patients during relaxed and drowsy wakefulness, to better understand the effects and the mechanisms of action of this intervention in humans. METHODS: Four patients with different structural epileptic pathologies were included in this retrospective case-cohort study. Short- and long-term electroencephalography (EEG) was used to determine states of relaxed or drowsy wakefulness and the vigilance changes during stimulation-on and stimulation-off intervals. RESULTS: In relaxed, wakeful patients with eyes closed, the eyelid artifact rate increased acutely and reproducibly during stimulation-on intervals, suggesting an enhanced vigilance. This effect was accompanied by a slight acceleration of the alpha rhythm. In drowsy patients with eyes closed, stimulation generated acutely and reproducibly alpha rhythms, similar to the paradoxical alpha activation during eyes opening. The occurrence of the alpha rhythms reflected an increase in the vigilance of the drowsy subjects during ANT-DBS. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first demonstration that ANT-DBS increases the vigilance of wakeful epilepsy patients. Our results deliver circumstantial evidence that high-frequency ANT-DBS activates thalamocortical connections that promote wakefulness.
Subject(s)
Anterior Thalamic Nuclei/physiology , Arousal/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Epilepsy/therapy , Relaxation/physiology , Wakefulness/physiology , Cohort Studies , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Electroencephalography/methods , Epilepsy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Relaxation/psychology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Assessing patient goals is crucial in understanding patient centered outcomes and satisfaction. However, patient goals may change throughout treatment. Our objective is to identify the changes in patient-selected goals of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and examine the relationship among patient-selected goal achievement, standard DBS outcome measures, and overall patient satisfaction. Seventy-five patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS listed three patient-selected goals before surgery. After six months, patients were asked to restate the three goals and to rate the degree of goal achievement and the overall satisfaction of surgery. The three most frequently selected goals were "dyskinesia", "gait disorder", and "medication off duration". After six months, 80.0% of patients could not accurately recall their pre-DBS goals. "Dyskinesia" was the most consistently selected goal, more patients selected "tremor" and "less medication" at post-DBS compared to pre-DBS, and less patients selected "gait disorder" at post-DBS compared to pre-DBS. 74.7% of patients reported overall satisfaction by stating they were "very much" or "much better after surgery". Patient satisfaction significantly correlated with goal achievement (r = 0.640; p < 0.001). Interestingly, change in UPDRS motor scores did not correlate with patient satisfaction (r = 0.100; p = 0.395). Although recalled goals do not accurately represent the pre-surgical goals, the achievement score for recalled goals significantly correlated with patient satisfaction. Patient goals change due to many reasons. Therefore, follow-up patient counseling to discuss goals and outcomes is important in improving patient satisfaction after STN-DBS.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Goals , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Subthalamic Nucleus/surgery , Adult , Aged , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Dyskinesias/prevention & control , Dyskinesias/therapy , Female , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/prevention & control , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Parkinson Disease/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Tremor/prevention & control , Tremor/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is increasingly used in pediatric patients affected by isolated dystonia, with excellent results. Despite well documented long-term effects on motor functioning, information on quality of life and social adaptation is almost lacking. OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to explore the experience of illness and the relation with the device in adult patients suffering from dystonia who underwent DBS surgery in pediatric age. METHODS: A narrative inquiry approach was used to collect patients' narratives of their experience with dystonia and DBS stimulator. A written interview was administered to 8 patients over 18 years old with generalized isolated dystonia who had undergone pallidal DBS implantation in childhood. A thematic analysis was realized to examine the narratives collected. RESULTS: Five main themes emerged: "relationship with the disease", "experience related to DBS procedure", "relationship with one's own body", "fears", "thoughts about future". Despite a general satisfaction in relation to DBS intervention, some patients expressed difficulties, such as the acceptance of changes in one's own body, concerns and fears regarding the device and the future, also considering the critical phase of transition from childhood to adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that further research is needed to understand the contribution of psychological, as much as medical, aspects to the overall outcome of the intervention. The present explorative study encourages a deeper investigations of psychological aspects of patients, in order to plan a tailored care path and to decide whether to suggest a psychological support, both before and after the intervention.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Dystonia/therapy , Self Concept , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for movement disorders. We have previously shown that in our practice, the majority of adult patients prefer fixed-life implantable pulse generators (IPGs), although rechargeable batteries are increasingly used. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' long-term satisfaction with their choice of battery and factors that influence their decision. METHODS: Thirty patients with DBS were given a questionnaire to assess long-term satisfaction and experience with the type of battery they had chosen. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients completed the survey. The mean age was 67.7 ± 7.3 years, and mean follow-up was 18.0 ± 7.2 months. The indications for DBS were Parkinson's disease (76.9%), tremor (11.5%) and dystonia (11.5%). Eleven patients (42.5%) had chosen the rechargeable battery. All patients were still happy with their choices and would not change the type of battery if they had the chance to do so. However, in patients who chose the fixed-life battery, concern about the size of battery rose from 6.7% pre-operatively to 60% on long-term post-operative follow-up. In patients who chose the rechargeable battery, concern about the need to recharge the battery did not change, remaining low postoperatively. Interestingly, even though the main reason cited for choosing the fixed-life battery was the convenience and concern about forgetting to recharge the battery, patients who had chosen a rechargeable IPG did not experience this problem. CONCLUSION: Patients and caregivers should be involved in the choice of battery, as each type of IPG has its own advantages and disadvantages. Long-term evaluation of patient's experience and satisfaction with battery of choice revealed that size of the IPG, need for further replacement surgeries and need for recharging remain matters of major concern. Although preoperatively often underestimated, the size of the battery seems to be an important factor in long-term satisfaction.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Implantable Neurostimulators/psychology , Patient Preference/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Dystonic Disorders/psychology , Dystonic Disorders/therapy , Electrodes, Implanted/psychology , Electrodes, Implanted/trends , Female , Humans , Implantable Neurostimulators/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Prospective Studies , Tremor/psychology , Tremor/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) is an effective therapy against medication-refractory motor complications in patients with Parkinson's disease. However, it remains difficult to predict which baseline patient characteristics are associated with quality of life (QoL) after surgery. The objective was to identify preoperative factors associated with QoL after STN DBS by systematically reviewing publications of sufficient methodological quality. METHODS: Main databases were systematically searched up to March 2019 to identify studies that investigated factors associated with QoL after STN DBS in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. RESULTS: In all, 869 studies were identified, of which 18 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Higher QoL after DBS appears to be associated with a large preoperative difference between ON and OFF motor function in some studies, although there was no clear association of severity of motor function or motor complications with postoperative QoL. Lower severity of dyskinesias was associated with greater postoperative QoL improvement but has been insufficiently studied. Higher baseline QoL was suggestive of higher postoperative QoL. Four studies suggested that older age at surgery is associated with a lower improvement, although six other studies reported no association. No or limited evidence was found for cognitive impairment or psychiatric dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Various relative contraindications for STN DBS such as cognitive impairment and psychiatric dysfunction appear to be unrelated to postoperative QoL. However, the lack of clear correlations with disease-related variables suggests that QoL may be individually influenced by other factors, indicating that an ideal preoperative patient profile with regard to QoL improvement cannot be readily provided.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Quality of Life/psychology , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiopathology , Humans , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an effective intervention for Parkinson's disease if drug therapy with dopaminergic medication has become insufficient. Current post-operative care focuses on optimizing the neurostimulator in combination with medication. We believe that the success rate of DBS surgery can be enhanced if more attention is paid to the (psychosocial) adjustment problems of patients and their families. Finding a new balance after surgery, in the relationship, family and work, is not easy and can be complicated by postoperative non-motor changes. Care for psychosocial adjustment may improve the quality of life and as such increase the overall outcome after surgery. We present two cases to illustrate these psychosocial adjustment problems. One case describes the impact of stimulation-related behavioural changes on relationships, while the other case describes difficulties in resuming work despite successful surgery. Psychosocial support appeared helpful for both cases to find their new balance in life.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Nonrechargeable deep brain stimulation implantable pulse generators (IPGs) for movement disorders require surgical replacement every few years due to battery depletion. Rechargeable IPGs reduce frequency of replacement surgeries and inherent risks of complications but require frequent recharging. Here, we evaluate patient experience with rechargeable IPGs and define predictive characteristics for higher satisfaction. METHODS: We contacted all patients implanted with rechargeable IPGs at a single center in a survey-based study. We analyzed patient satisfaction with respect to age, diagnosis, target, charging duration, and body mass index. We tabulated hardware-related adverse events. RESULTS: Dystonia patients had significantly higher satisfaction than Parkinson's disease patients in recharging, display, programmer, and training domains. Common positive responses were "fewer surgeries" and "small size." Common negative responses were "difficulty finding the right position to recharge" and "need to recharge every day." Hardware-related adverse events occurred in 21 of 59 participants. CONCLUSION: Patient experience with rechargeable IPGs was largely positive; however, frustrations with recharging and adverse events were common. Dystonia diagnosis was most predictive of high satisfaction across multiple categories, potentially related to expected long disease duration with need for numerous IPG replacements.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Electric Power Supplies , Electrodes, Implanted/psychology , Implantable Neurostimulators/psychology , Movement Disorders/psychology , Movement Disorders/therapy , Adult , Aged , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time FactorsABSTRACT
This editorial presents a special issue gathering four contributions about the patient's lived experience in the context of deep-brain stimulation. It aims at clarifying the meaning of such an experience and its scope for medical practice, the health system and its legal frame.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Patients/psychology , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether there is a gender disparity in patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD) at a single health system, and better understand the reasons for this discrepancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from the University of Miami DBS Database, which included 3251 PD patients, using chi-square, repeated measures ANOVA, and t tests to examine gender differences in the number of patients referred for surgery, reasons for referral, number receiving/not receiving surgery, reasons for not receiving surgery, and postsurgical outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 207 PD patients were referred for DBS (75.8% male), and 100 underwent surgery (77.0% male). Of those who did not receive surgery, the most common reasons were need for further medical optimization (26.2%), suboptimal performance on neuropsychological evaluation (22.4%), other reason (20.6%), lost to follow-up (18.7%), or patient preference (12.2%). However, in women one of the most common reasons was patient preference (28.0%), and this was significant compared to men (p < 0.001). Men were more likely to be lost to follow-up (p = 0.046). There was no statistically significant difference in postsurgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar postsurgical improvements, women were less likely to undergo DBS surgery due to their own preference, while men were more likely to be lost to follow-up. These data underscore the need for increased education and awareness of DBS so that all patients with PD who qualify for surgery can benefit from this procedure.
Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/psychology , Healthcare Disparities , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Parkinson Disease/surgery , Patient Preference/psychology , Sex Characteristics , Aged , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/diagnosisABSTRACT
Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) may benefit from deep brain stimulation (DBS) to improve motor and medication-induced symptoms. Yet mixed evidence regarding the outcome of successful DBS on couple satisfaction has been highlighted in the literature. Thirty patients diagnosed with PD were included in a study investigating couple satisfaction (MSS-14), depression (HAD-D) and anxiety (HAD-A) at four measurement times: before DBS and 6, 12, and 18 months post-surgically. Sixteen spouses/partners were included as well. Couple satisfaction from the patient perspective was never associated with depression or anxiety. However, poor marital adjustment (i.e., difference and absolute difference between patients and spouses/partners MSS-14 scores) predicted patients' pre-operative depressive mood. Longitudinal analyses showed that couple satisfaction (n = 9) worsened at 12 months and 18 months compared to pre-DBS scores, F(2.047, 16.378) = 8.723, p = .003, and despite concomitant motor improvement. Growth curve analyses showed that couple satisfaction worsening occurred between 6 and 12 months post-operatively (b = 2.938, p < .001). Thus, couple satisfaction did not increase along with motor improvement and deteriorated after the adjustment period following DBS.