Will the Current COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Long-term Cannabis Buying Practices?

: The COVID-19 pandemic and the response to have resulted in an increase in sales activity levels on darknet markets during the first 3 months of 2020, mainly related to cannabis products. One key question is whether more people will become used to this form of purchasing their drugs and will they continue with it post COVID-19 lockdown. As one-to-one encrypted communication services or social media apps are increasingly being used, monitoring and interdiction will become much more challenging.

What can be done to impact respiratory inhaler misuse: exploring the problem, reasons, and solutions.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory inhalers, when used correctly, provide critical treatments for managing pulmonary conditions. However, many patients misuse inhalers, negatively affecting disease control, quality of life, healthcare utilization, and costs. Numerous factors are associated with misuse and are nested within four levels of influence: individual, interpersonal, organizational/institutional, and policy. AREAS COVERED: This review analyzed published literature and identified the most salient factors at each socio-ecological framework level. English language articles from any year were identified from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase databases. Misuse exists across clinical settings, patient populations, and device types. Several potential solutions are highlighted. Published interventions to improve inhaler technique have utilized handouts, in-person, virtual, and biofeedback approaches both inside and outside of healthcare settings with varied effectiveness. However, some interventions have superior effectiveness for improving technique and reducing acute care utilization. EXPERT OPINION: To robustly address inhaler misuse, future solutions should focus on multi-level approaches to account for the myriad of factors contributing to inhaler misuse. Solutions should also streamline inhaler equipment, identify innovative technology-based solutions, support collaborations across healthcare and non-healthcare settings, and ensure reimbursement to healthcare professionals for inhaler education. Rigorous research studies must be funded and supported to identify and disseminate solutions.

Opioid losses in terms of dosage and value, January 2012 to September 2017: a retrospective analysis of Health Canada data.

BACKGROUND: Canadian health care facilities must report losses or thefts of opioids to Health Canada. To broaden the understanding of opioid loss in Canada, we analyzed data describing these losses to estimate the amount of opioid lost, estimate the wholesale and street value, compare the distribution of loss types between facility types and compare loss trends. METHODS: We analyzed Health Canada records of losses of codeine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine and oxycodone reported by Canadian facilities from January 2012 to September 2017. We conducted descriptive analyses of the opioid losses by calculating milligrams of drug lost, oral morphine equivalents, daily defined doses, approximate wholesale value and approximate street value, and compared loss trends when counted by incidents, dosage units or milligrams. RESULTS: There were 64 963 reports of loss of codeine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine or oxycodone over the study period. Over 112 kg of opioids were lost, an estimated $8.7 million in wholesale cost and $136 million in street value. The dominant loss categories varied by facility type: armed robbery (30.9 kg [31.1%]) for community pharmacies, unexplained losses (6.4 kg [55.8%]) for companies and pilferage (0.8 kg [57.4%]) for hospitals. Loss trends over the study period varied by reporting metric and facility type: community pharmacy losses increased when measured by dosage units and incidents of loss, and remained stable when measured by milligrams; hospital losses increased when measured by milligrams and showed no clear trend when measured by dosage units and incidents of loss. Companies showed no clear loss trend with any reporting metric. INTERPRETATION: Large quantities of opioids were lost or stolen from community pharmacies, companies and hospitals over the study period, and these losses are valued in millions of dollars. Publishing milligrams of opioids lost annually alongside metrics such as dosage units and incidents of loss would help characterize the economic cost and the magnitude of drug losses.

Antibiotic misuse: How to evaluate the costs?

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have assessed the costs associated with the misuse of antibiotics in hospitals in France, despite the value of health economic data to inform antibiotic stewardship activities. We aimed to identify the methodological tools used to assess the cost of antibiotic misuse in hospitals. METHODS: We performed a literature review using the major electronic medical databases. An index of relevance was developed to assess the intrinsic quality of selected articles. RESULTS: Four hundred and three articles were retrieved, but 35 were selected for analysis. Most studies investigated the inadequate choice of the antibiotic molecule (n=17), the incorrect treatment duration (n=9), and the administration of an inappropriate dosage (n=7). Only three studies were medical/economic evaluations of specific interventions, such as prescription control by pharmacists or the implementation of a new diagnostic test. Considering our aim, the relevance of the studies was limited: few had defined the economic assessment as the primary objective or had detailed the method for calculating costs. Nevertheless, the misuse evaluation was usually better described. CONCLUSIONS: Despite these limits, key factors for measuring antibiotic misuse (i.e., molecule choice, dosage) in relation to the costs (i.e., over/under prescription, hospital stay, staff remuneration) might serve as the basis for the development of a reference methodology to value the costs of misuse. The application of this methodology on identified situations of antibiotic misuse would help hospital decision-makers to justify resource allocation for implementing antimicrobial stewardship activities.

Counting the cost of over-the-counter codeine containing analgesic misuse: A retrospective review of hospital admissions over a 5 year period.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Combination analgesics containing codeine (CACC) are currently available over-the-counter (OTC) in many countries following a pharmacist's advice. Published case reports detail life-threatening morbidities associated with OTC-CACC misuse, although the cost of treating such patients has not been quantified. This study aims to: (i) identify and detail patients admitted to an Australian tertiary teaching hospital over a 5 year period with sequelae of OTC-CACC misuse; and (ii) estimate the costs of identified hospital admissions. DESIGN AND METHODS: Using International Classification of Diseases (10th revision) diagnostic codes, a structured search was performed to identify admissions to a tertiary teaching hospital, relating to CACC misuse, over the defined period. A retrospective case note review provided data detailing patient characteristics, presenting morbidities and resultant interventions, and an approximate cost was calculated for identified admissions. RESULTS: Ninety-nine OTC-CACC-related admissions (for 30 individual patients) were identified. Most related to gastrointestinal morbidities secondary to ibuprofen/codeine misuse. Mean length of stay per admission was 5.9 days, with 10.1% of admissions requiring intensive care. Patients consumed a daily mean of 28 OTC-CACC tablets for a mean of 606 days prior to admission. These 99 admissions were estimated to cost the health system AU$1 008 082 with a mean cost per admission of AU$10 183. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of OTC-CACC misuse are serious and come at a significant cost to patient health and the Australian health-care system. Identification and management of this cohort appears sub-optimal with delays in diagnosis and high readmission rates.