Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.263
Filter
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 410: 132230, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852859

ABSTRACT

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is routinely required during pre-participation screening in the presence of symptoms, family history of sudden cardiac death or cardiomyopathies <40-year-old, murmurs, abnormal ECG findings or in the follow-up of athletes with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). TTE is a cost-effective first-line imaging modality to evaluate the cardiac remodeling due to long-term, intense training, previously known as the athlete's heart, and to rule out the presence of conditions at risk of sudden cardiac death, including cardiomyopathies, coronary artery anomalies, congenital, aortic and heart valve diseases. Moreover, TTE is useful for distinguishing physiological cardiac adaptations during intense exercise from pathological behavior due to an underlying CVD. In this expert opinion statement endorsed by the Italian Society of Sports Cardiology, we discussed common clinical scenarios where a TTE is required and conditions falling in the grey zone between the athlete's heart and underlying cardiomyopathies or other CVD. In addition, we propose a minimum dataset that should be included in the report for the most common indications of TTE in sports cardiology clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Cardiology , Echocardiography , Societies, Medical , Sports Medicine , Humans , Echocardiography/methods , Echocardiography/standards , Sports Medicine/methods , Sports Medicine/standards , Italy , Societies, Medical/standards , Cardiology/standards , Cardiology/methods , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Athletes , Expert Testimony/methods , Expert Testimony/standards , Sports/physiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging
2.
Tunis Med ; 102(6): 331-336, 2024 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38864195

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Critical Care ultrasound (CCUS) is more and more used in Tunisian critical care units. An objective assessment of this training has not yet been performed. AIM: To assess the theoretical and practical knowledge about CCUS among Intensive Care Unit (ICU) residents. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted during the period from January to June 2021. Data were collected using a French language questionnaire distributed on the day of the selection of the residents' posts for the next training period (at the end of June 2021). RESULTS: Out of 75 residents, 37 accepted to answer to the survey (Participation rate =49 %). The majority were female (66.4%). The mean age was 29±12.36 years. Only 5.4% of participants (n=2) had previously received training concerning echocardiography and only 8.1% of the participants have received dedicated training for lung ultrasound (LU). Among the participants, 80.1% of residents (n=30) had never performed a transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Competence in performing echocardiography was self-assessed quite good and bad by 5.4% and 43.2% of responders respectively. Most of the residents (86%) did not insert before ultrasound-guided central venous catheters. Views known by the participants using TTE were mainly parasternal long axis section (56.8%) and apical 4/5 chambers section (52.8%). All participants (100%) thought that teaching CCU is a necessary part of the training of intensivists. CONCLUSION: Our study highlighted the lack of training of Tunisian ICU residents regarding CCUS learning. Therefore, it is crucial to integrate such learning and training into their training programs.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Critical Care , Echocardiography , Intensive Care Units , Internship and Residency , Ultrasonography , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Tunisia , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Female , Adult , Male , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Echocardiography/standards , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ultrasonography/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography/methods , Young Adult
3.
Glob Heart ; 19(1): 47, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38765776

ABSTRACT

Background: The World Heart Federation (WHF) published the first evidence-based guidelines on the echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in 2012. These guidelines have since been applied internationally in research and clinical practice. Substantial research has assessed the utility of the 2012 WHF criteria, including its applicability in low-resource settings. This article summarises the evidence regarding the performance of the guidelines. Methods: A scoping review assessing the performance of the guidelines was performed. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed Lilacs, Sielo, and Portal BVS databases were searched for studies on the performance of the guidelines between January 2012-March 2023, and 4047 manuscripts met the search criteria, of which 34 were included. This included papers assessing the specificity, inter-rater reliability, application using hand-carried ultrasound, and modification of the criteria for simplicity. The review followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Results: The WHF 2012 criteria were 100% specific for definite RHD when applied in low-prevalence populations. The criteria demonstrated substantial and moderate inter-rater reliability for detecting definite and borderline RHD, respectively. The inter-rater reliability for morphological features was lower than for valvular regurgitation. When applied to hand-carried ultrasound performed by an expert, modified versions of the criteria demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity range of 79-90% and 87-93% respectively for detecting any RHD, performing best for definite RHD. The sensitivity and the specificity were reduced when performed in task-sharing but remains moderately accurate. Conclusion: The WHF 2012 criteria provide clear guidance for the echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD that is reproducible and applicable to a range of echocardiographic technology. Furthermore, the criteria are highly specific and particularly accurate for detecting definite RHD. There are limitations in applying all aspects of the criteria in specific settings, including task-sharing. This summary of evidence can inform the updated version of the WHF guidelines to ensure improved applicability in all RHD endemic regions.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography , Rheumatic Heart Disease , Humans , Echocardiography/methods , Echocardiography/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Rheumatic Heart Disease/diagnostic imaging , Rheumatic Heart Disease/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
4.
Heart Lung Circ ; 33(6): 773-827, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749800

ABSTRACT

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the most widely available and utilised imaging modality for the screening, diagnosis, and serial monitoring of all abnormalities related to cardiac structure or function. The primary objectives of this document are to provide (1) a guiding framework for treating clinicians of the acceptable indications for the initial and serial TTE assessments of the commonly encountered cardiovascular conditions in adults, and (2) the minimum required standard for TTE examinations and reporting for imaging service providers. The main areas covered within this Position Statement pertain to the TTE assessment of the left and right ventricles, valvular heart diseases, pericardial diseases, aortic diseases, infective endocarditis, cardiac masses, pulmonary hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases associated with cancer treatments or cardio-oncology. Facilitating the optimal use and performance of high quality TTEs will prevent the over or under-utilisation of this resource and unnecessary downstream testing due to suboptimal or incomplete studies.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography , Heart Valve Diseases , Humans , Echocardiography/methods , Echocardiography/standards , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Societies, Medical , Cardiology/methods , Cardiology/standards
6.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(7): 1460-1466, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580474

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of identifying the true aortic valve (AV) annulus using 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography, with the goal of highlighting potential misidentification issues in clinical practice. DESIGN: An observational study employing 3-dimensional (3D) datasets to generate 2D images of the AV annulus for analysis. SETTING: The study was conducted in an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography datasets were obtained from 11 patients with normal AV and aortic root anatomies undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Attending anesthesiologists certified by the National Board of Echocardiography (NBE) were approached subsequently to participate in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Two images per patient were generated from 3D datasets, reflecting the mid-esophageal long-axis view of the AV, a true AV annulus image, and an off-axis image. A survey was distributed to NBE-certified perioperative echocardiographers across 12 academic institutions to identify the true AV annulus from these images. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The survey, completed by 45 qualified respondents, revealed a significant misidentification rate of the true AV annulus, with only 36.8% of responses correctly identifying it. The rate of correct identification varied across image sets, with 44.4% of participants unable to correctly identify any true AV annulus image. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the limitations of 2D echocardiography in accurately identifying the true AV annulus in complex 3D structures like the aortic root. The findings suggest a need for greater reliance on advanced imaging modalities, such as 3D echocardiography, to improve accuracy in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Humans , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional/methods , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional/standards , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/methods , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/standards , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Echocardiography/methods , Echocardiography/standards
8.
Nature ; 616(7957): 520-524, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37020027

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been developed for echocardiography1-3, although it has not yet been tested with blinding and randomization. Here we designed a blinded, randomized non-inferiority clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05140642; no outside funding) of AI versus sonographer initial assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to evaluate the impact of AI in the interpretation workflow. The primary end point was the change in the LVEF between initial AI or sonographer assessment and final cardiologist assessment, evaluated by the proportion of studies with substantial change (more than 5% change). From 3,769 echocardiographic studies screened, 274 studies were excluded owing to poor image quality. The proportion of studies substantially changed was 16.8% in the AI group and 27.2% in the sonographer group (difference of -10.4%, 95% confidence interval: -13.2% to -7.7%, P < 0.001 for non-inferiority, P < 0.001 for superiority). The mean absolute difference between final cardiologist assessment and independent previous cardiologist assessment was 6.29% in the AI group and 7.23% in the sonographer group (difference of -0.96%, 95% confidence interval: -1.34% to -0.54%, P < 0.001 for superiority). The AI-guided workflow saved time for both sonographers and cardiologists, and cardiologists were not able to distinguish between the initial assessments by AI versus the sonographer (blinding index of 0.088). For patients undergoing echocardiographic quantification of cardiac function, initial assessment of LVEF by AI was non-inferior to assessment by sonographers.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Cardiologists , Echocardiography , Heart Function Tests , Humans , Artificial Intelligence/standards , Echocardiography/methods , Echocardiography/standards , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Single-Blind Method , Workflow , Reproducibility of Results , Heart Function Tests/methods , Heart Function Tests/standards
9.
Chin Med Sci J ; 38(2): 125-129, 2023 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36890750

ABSTRACT

Objectives To learn the echocardiography skills of intensivists after receiving a basic critical care echocardiography training course, and investigate factors that may influence their performance. Methods We completed a web-based questionnaire that assessed the skills in ultrasound scanning techniques of intensivists who took a training course on basic critical care echocardiography held in 2019 and 2020. Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the factors which might affect their performance on image acquisition, recognizing clinical syndrome, and measuring the diameter of inferior vena cava, left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral.Results We enrolled 554 physicians from 412 intensive care units across China. Among them, 185 (33.4%) reported that they had 10%-30% chance of being misled by critical care echocardiography when making therapeutic decision, and 34 (6.1%) reported that the chance was greater than 30%. Intensivists who performed echocardiography under the guidance of a mentor and finished ultrasound scanning more than 10 times per week reported significant higher scores in image acquisition, clinical syndrome recognition, and quantitative measurement of inferior vena cava diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral than those without mentor and performing echocardiography 10 times or less per week respectively (all P < 0.05).Conclusion The skills in diagnostic medical echocardiography of Chinese intensivists after a basic echocardiographic training course remain low, and further quality assurance training program is clearly warranted.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Echocardiography , Internal Medicine , Self-Assessment , Humans , East Asian People , Echocardiography/methods , Echocardiography/standards , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Physicians/standards , Internal Medicine/standards
10.
Nature ; 613(7945): 667-675, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36697864

ABSTRACT

Continuous imaging of cardiac functions is highly desirable for the assessment of long-term cardiovascular health, detection of acute cardiac dysfunction and clinical management of critically ill or surgical patients1-4. However, conventional non-invasive approaches to image the cardiac function cannot provide continuous measurements owing to device bulkiness5-11, and existing wearable cardiac devices can only capture signals on the skin12-16. Here we report a wearable ultrasonic device for continuous, real-time and direct cardiac function assessment. We introduce innovations in device design and material fabrication that improve the mechanical coupling between the device and human skin, allowing the left ventricle to be examined from different views during motion. We also develop a deep learning model that automatically extracts the left ventricular volume from the continuous image recording, yielding waveforms of key cardiac performance indices such as stroke volume, cardiac output and ejection fraction. This technology enables dynamic wearable monitoring of cardiac performance with substantially improved accuracy in various environments.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography , Equipment Design , Heart , Wearable Electronic Devices , Humans , Cardiac Output , Echocardiography/instrumentation , Echocardiography/standards , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Stroke Volume , Wearable Electronic Devices/standards , Skin
11.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-981592

ABSTRACT

Objectives To learn the echocardiography skills of intensivists after receiving a basic critical care echocardiography training course, and investigate factors that may influence their performance. Methods We completed a web-based questionnaire that assessed the skills in ultrasound scanning techniques of intensivists who took a training course on basic critical care echocardiography held in 2019 and 2020. Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the factors which might affect their performance on image acquisition, recognizing clinical syndrome, and measuring the diameter of inferior vena cava, left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral.Results We enrolled 554 physicians from 412 intensive care units across China. Among them, 185 (33.4%) reported that they had 10%-30% chance of being misled by critical care echocardiography when making therapeutic decision, and 34 (6.1%) reported that the chance was greater than 30%. Intensivists who performed echocardiography under the guidance of a mentor and finished ultrasound scanning more than 10 times per week reported significant higher scores in image acquisition, clinical syndrome recognition, and quantitative measurement of inferior vena cava diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral than those without mentor and performing echocardiography 10 times or less per week respectively (all P < 0.05).Conclusion The skills in diagnostic medical echocardiography of Chinese intensivists after a basic echocardiographic training course remain low, and further quality assurance training program is clearly warranted.


Subject(s)
Humans , Clinical Competence , East Asian People , Echocardiography/standards , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Self-Assessment , Physicians/standards , Internal Medicine/standards
12.
Can J Cardiol ; 38(3): 338-346, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34871728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Strict isolation precautions limit formal echocardiography use in the setting of COVID-19 infection. Information on the importance of handheld focused ultrasound for cardiac evaluation in these patients is scarce. This study investigated the utility of a handheld echocardiography device in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in diagnosing cardiac pathologies and predicting the composite end point of in-hospital death, mechanical ventilation, shock, and acute decompensated heart failure. METHODS: From April 28 through July 27, 2020, consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 underwent evaluation with the use of handheld ultrasound (Vscan Extend with Dual Probe; GE Healthcare) within 48 hours of admission. The patients were divided into 2 groups: "normal" and "abnormal" echocardiogram, as defined by biventricular systolic dysfunction/enlargement or moderate/severe valvular regurgitation/stenosis. RESULTS: Among 102 patients, 26 (25.5%) had abnormal echocardiograms. They were older with more comorbidities and more severe presenting symptoms compared with the group with normal echocardiograms. The prevalences of the composite outcome among low- and high-risk patients (oxygen saturation < 94%) were 3.1% and 27.1%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an abnormal echocardiogram at presentation was independently associated with the composite end point (odds ratio 6.19, 95% confidence interval 1.50-25.57; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal echocardiogram in COVID-19 infection settings is associated with a higher burden of medical comorbidities and independently predicts major adverse end points. Handheld focused echocardiography can be used as an important "rule-out" tool among high-risk patients with COVID-19 and should be integrated into their routine admission evaluation. However, its routine use among low-risk patients is not recommended.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Echocardiography/instrumentation , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/instrumentation , Aged , Echocardiography/standards , Female , Heart Diseases/etiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Lung Diseases/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Ultrasonography/standards
13.
Crit Care Med ; 50(1): 126-137, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325447

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and meta-analyze the validity of electrical bioimpedance-based noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in pediatrics compared with standard methods such as thermodilution and echocardiography. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2000-2019). STUDY SELECTION: Method-comparison studies of transthoracic electrical velocimetry or whole body electrical bioimpedance versus standard cardiac output monitoring methods in children (0-18 yr old) were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Mean differences of cardiac output, stroke volume, or cardiac index measurements were pooled using a random-effects model (R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2019). Bland-Altman statistics assessing agreement between devices and author conclusions about inferiority/noninferiority were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-nine of 649 identified studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 25 studies in the meta-analyses. No significant difference was found between means of cardiac output, stroke volume, and cardiac index measurements, except in exclusively neonatal/infant studies reporting stroke volume (mean difference, 1.00 mL; 95% CI, 0.23-1.77). Median percentage error in child/adolescent studies approached acceptability (percentage error less than or equal to 30%) for cardiac output in L/min (31%; range, 13-158%) and stroke volume in mL (26%; range, 14-27%), but not in neonatal/infant studies (45%; range, 29-53% and 45%; range, 28-70%, respectively). Twenty of 29 studies concluded that transthoracic electrical velocimetry/whole body electrical bioimpedance was noninferior. Transthoracic electrical velocimetry was considered inferior in six of nine studies with heterogeneous congenital heart disease populations. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analyses demonstrated no significant difference between means of compared devices (except in neonatal stroke volume studies). The wide range of percentage error reported may be due to heterogeneity of study designs, devices, and populations included. Transthoracic electrical velocimetry/whole body electrical bioimpedance may be acceptable for use in child/adolescent populations, but validity in neonates and congenital heart disease patients remains uncertain. Larger studies in specific clinical contexts with standardized methodologies are required.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Output/physiology , Cardiography, Impedance/standards , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Echocardiography/standards , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Stroke Volume/physiology , Thermodilution/standards
14.
Chest ; 161(2): 492-503, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34508739

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the paucity of high-quality studies on longitudinal basic critical care echocardiography (BCCE) training, expert opinion guidelines have guided BCCE competence educational standards and processes. However, existing guidelines lack precise detail due to methodological flaws during guideline development. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: To formulate methodologically robust guidelines on BCCE training using evidence and expert opinion, detailing specific criteria for every step, we conducted a modified Delphi process using the principles of the validated AGREE-II tool. Based on systematic reviews, the following domains were chosen: components of a longitudinal BCCE curriculum; pass-grade criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation; and formative/summative assessment and final competence processes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between April 2020 and May 2021, a total of 21 BCCE experts participated in four rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 used five web-based questionnaires, including branching-logic software for directed questions to individual panelists. In round 3 (videoconference), the panel finalized the recommendations by vote. During the journal peer-review process, Round 4 was conducted as Web-based questionnaires. Following each round, the agreement threshold for each item was determined as ≥ 80% for item inclusion and ≤ 30% for item exclusion. RESULTS: Following rounds 1 and 2, agreement was reached on 62 of 114 items. To the 49 unresolved items, 12 additional items were added in round 3, with 56 reaching agreement and five items remaining unresolved. There was agreement that longitudinal BCCE training must include introductory training, mentored formative training, summative assessment for competence, and final cognitive assessment. Items requiring multiple rounds included two-dimensional views, Doppler, cardiac output, M-mode measurement, minimum scan numbers, and pass-grade criteria. Regarding objective criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation quality, the panel agreed on maintaining the same criteria for formative and summative assessment, to categorize BCCE findings as major vs minor and a standardized approach to errors, criteria for readiness for summative assessment, and supervisory options. INTERPRETATION: In conclusion, this expert consensus statement presents comprehensive evidence-based recommendations on longitudinal BCCE training. However, these recommendations require prospective validation.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Critical Care/standards , Delphi Technique , Echocardiography/standards , Education, Medical, Graduate , Curriculum , Evidence-Based Medicine , Guidelines as Topic , Humans
15.
Stroke ; 53(1): 177-184, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34496617

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cardiac ultrasound to identify sources of cardioembolism is part of the diagnostic workup of acute ischemic stroke. Recommendations on whether transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) should be performed in addition to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are controversial. We aimed to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of TEE in addition to TTE in patients with acute ischemic stroke with undetermined cause. METHODS: In a prospective, observational, pragmatic multicenter cohort study, patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack with undetermined cause before cardiac ultrasound were studied by TTE and TEE. The primary outcome was the rate of treatment-relevant findings in TTE and TEE as defined by a panel of experts based on current evidence. Further outcomes included the rate of changes in the assessment of stroke cause after TEE. RESULTS: Between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019, we enrolled 494 patients, of whom 492 (99.6%) received TTE and 454 (91.9%) received TEE. Mean age was 64.7 years, and 204 (41.3%) were women. TEE showed a higher rate of treatment-relevant findings than TTE (86 [18.9%] versus 64 [14.1%], P<0.001). TEE in addition to TTE resulted in 29 (6.4%) additional patients with treatment-relevant findings. Among 191 patients ≤60 years additional treatment-relevant findings by TEE were observed in 27 (14.1%) patients. Classification of stroke cause changed after TEE in 52 of 453 patients (11.5%), resulting in a significant difference in the distribution of stroke cause before and after TEE (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with undetermined cause of stroke, TEE yielded a higher number of treatment-relevant findings than TTE. TEE appears especially useful in younger patients with stroke, with treatment-relevant findings in one out of seven patients ≤60 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03411642.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography, Transesophageal/standards , Echocardiography/standards , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/therapy , Aged , Cohort Studies , Echocardiography/trends , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/trends , Female , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Stroke/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
16.
Anesthesiology ; 135(5): 854-863, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34543408

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative resting echocardiography is often performed before noncardiac surgery, but indications for preoperative resting echocardiography are limited. This study aimed to investigate appropriateness of preoperative resting echocardiography using the Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography, which encompass indications from the guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management and nonperioperative indications independent of the perioperative period. The authors hypothesized that patients are frequently tested without an appropriate indication. METHODS: Records of patients in the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases who underwent a major abdominal surgery from 2005 to 2017 were included. These databases contain de-identified records of health services for more than 250 million patients with primary or Medicare supplemental health insurance coverage through employer-based fee-for-service, point-of-service, or capitated plans. Patients were classified based on the presence of an outpatient claim for resting transthoracic echocardiography within 60 days of surgery. Appropriateness was determined via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision-Clinical Modification principal and secondary diagnosis codes associated with the claims, and classified as "appropriate," "rarely appropriate," or "unclassifiable" using the Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. RESULTS: Among 230,535 patients in the authors' cohort, preoperative resting transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 6.0% (13,936) of patients. There were 12,638 (91%) studies classifiable by the Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography, and 1,298 (9%) were unable to be classified. Among the classifiable studies, 8,959 (71%) were deemed "appropriate," while 3,679 (29%) were deemed "rarely appropriate." Surveillance of chronic ischemic heart disease and uncomplicated hypertension accounted for 43% (1,588 of 3,679) of "rarely appropriate" echocardiograms. CONCLUSIONS: More than one in four preoperative resting echocardiograms were considered "rarely appropriate" according to the Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A narrow set of patient characteristics accounts for a large proportion of "rarely appropriate" preoperative resting echocardiograms.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , Echocardiography/methods , Echocardiography/standards , Preoperative Care/methods , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States
17.
Chest ; (21)20210908.
Article in English | BIGG - GRADE guidelines | ID: biblio-1292248

ABSTRACT

With the paucity of high-quality studies on longitudinal basic critical care echocardiography (BCCE) training, expert-opinion guidelines have guided BCCE training. However, existing guidelines lack precise detail due to methodological flaws during guideline-development. To formulate methodologically robust guidelines on BCCE training using evidence and expert opinion, detailing specific criteria for every step, we conducted a modified Delphi process using the principles of the validated AGREE-II tool. Based on systematic reviews, the following domains were chosen ­ components of a longitudinal BCCE curriculum; pass-grade criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation; formative/summative assessment and final competence processes. Between April 2020 and May 2021, 21 BCCE experts participated in four rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 used five web-based questionnaires, including branching-logic software for directed questions to individual panelists. In round 3 (videoconference), the panel finalized the recommendations by vote. During the journal peer-review process, Round 4 was conducted as web-based questionnaires. After each round, the agreement threshold for each item was determined >80% for item-inclusion and <30% for item-exclusion. After rounds 1 and 2, agreement was reached on 62/114 item. To the 49 unresolved items, 12 additional items were added in round 3, with 56 reaching agreement and five items remaining unresolved. There was agreement that longitudinal BCCE training must include introductory training, mentored formative training, summative assessment for competence and final cognitive assessment. Items requiring multiple rounds included 2D views, Doppler, cardiac output, M-mode measurement, minimum scan numbers, pass-grade criteria. Regarding objective criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation quality, the panel agreed on maintaining the same criteria for formative and summative assessment, to categorize BCCE findings as major versus minor and a standardized approach to errors, criteria for readiness for summative assessment and supervisory options. In conclusion, this expert consensus statement presents comprehensive evidence-based recommendations on longitudinal BCCE training. However, they require prospective validation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Echocardiography/standards , Critical Care/standards , Delphi Technique
20.
Prenat Diagn ; 41(12): 1486-1497, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34176152

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To create prescriptive standards of cardiac morphometric and functional parameters in a cohort of uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twins. METHOD: Fetal echocardiography was performed in a cohort of uncomplicated monochorionic twin fetuses scanned longitudinally, including comprehensive morphometric and functional parameters, using 2-D imaging, M-mode and conventional Doppler. A multilevel polynomial hierarchical model adjusted by gestational age and estimated fetal weight was used to fit each cardiac parameter. RESULTS: The global heart dimensions including the atrial and ventricular areas, the ventricles dimensions and myocardial wall thicknesses and most of the functional parameters, such as the longitudinal myocardial motion and the biventricular cardiac output showed a positive quadratic increment throughout pregnancy. On the other hand, the left ejection fraction, shortening fraction and right fractional area change decreased with gestational age. Scatterplots for the main structural and functional parameters and ratios by gestational age, with mean, 5th, 10th, 90th, and 95th percentiles are provided. Regression equations by estimated fetal weight are also created. CONCLUSION: We provide specific comprehensive echocardiographic prescriptive standards for uncomplicated MCDA twin fetuses following current standardized methodology. The implementation of these charts will potentially help to better identify abnormal cardiovascular parameters associated to monochorionic complications.


Subject(s)
Echocardiography/methods , Twins, Dizygotic , Adult , Blood Flow Velocity/physiology , Cohort Studies , Echocardiography/standards , Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Female , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Gestational Age , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Spain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...