ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with and without macrotrabecular-massive (MTM) subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients with HCC (male, 90.3%; mean age, 65.3 years [SD ± 10.7]) who underwent yttrium-90 TARE between September 2014 and January 2022 were grouped into the MTM-HCC (n = 17, 41.5%) and non-MTM-HCC (n = 24, 58.5%) groups based on their histopathological subtypes. Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics were compared. Survival, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed, and prognostic factors were evaluated. RESULTS: In MTM-HCC group, the rates of moderately to poorly differentiated tumors were significantly higher (13/17 vs 8/16, P = .007), and new intrahepatic/extrahepatic metastases were detected more frequently (12/17 vs 15/24, P = .038). Median overall survival (OS) in the cohort was 29 months (range, 17.1-40.9 months), whereas patients with MTM-HCC had a significantly shorter median OS (20 vs 44 months, P = .014). In univariate analysis, MTM-HCC subtype (hazard ratio [HR], 2.690; P = .021), the presence of satellite nodules (HR, 3.810; P = .004), and macrovascular invasion (HR, 3.321; P = .012) were identified as significant prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, MTM-HCC subtype and macrovascular invasion were determined as independent poor prognostic factors (P = .038 and P = .012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HCC treated with yttrium-90 TARE, both the rates of moderately to poorly differentiated histopathological classes and the development of intrahepatic or extrahepatic metastases were significantly higher in the MTM-HCC subtype. OS was worse in patients with MTM-HCC, and macrovascular invasion and MTM-HCC subtype were identified as independent poor prognostic factors.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Embolization, Therapeutic , Liver Neoplasms , Radiopharmaceuticals , Yttrium Radioisotopes , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Male , Yttrium Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Female , Aged , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tumor BurdenABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To identify factors of incomplete treatment after segmental transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for treatment-naive and solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 75 consecutive patients (age, 68.5 years [SD ± 8.0]; 25/75 [33.3%] women) with treatment-naive, solitary HCC underwent segmental or subsegmental TARE with glass microspheres (tumor size, 3.8 cm [SD ± 2.2]; administered dose, 222.6 Gy [SD ± 123.9]) at a single institution from November 2015 to June 2022. Radiologic response and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed as per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: Complete treatment was achieved in 48 of 75 (64.0%) patients (mean follow-up, 33.2 months [SD ± 27.4]). Patients with incomplete treatment (27/75, 36%) presented with larger tumor size (5.0 [SD ± 2.5] vs 3.1 [SD ± 1.6] cm; P = .0001), with more tumors located in the watershed zone (81.5% vs 41.7%; P = .001). These patients were less likely to be bridged to transplant or resection (22.2% vs 52.1%; P = .015). Watershed tumors demonstrated worse target tumor PFS (median PFS, 19 months vs not reached; P = .0104) and overall PFS (9.1 months vs not reached; P = .0077). Watershed location was associated with worse PFS among tumors >3 cm in size (8.4 months vs not reached; P = .035) but not in tumors ≤3 cm in size (52.2 months vs not reached; P = .915). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size and watershed location were associated with incomplete treatment after segmental TARE for HCC. Watershed tumors were associated with worse PFS, particularly tumors larger than 3 cm. These tumors may require careful treatment planning and repeated treatments to ensure a durable response.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Disease Progression , Embolization, Therapeutic , Liver Neoplasms , Microspheres , Progression-Free Survival , Radiopharmaceuticals , Tumor Burden , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Yttrium Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Yttrium Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The off-label utilization of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is a common practice in numerous medical centers globally. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the overall outcomes of this off-label usage of PEDs. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Scopus were searched up to February 2023 using the Nested Knowledge platform to identify studies assessing the off-label use of PEDs. Any use of PED outside of the FDA-approved indication granted in 2018 is considered off-label use. Overall angiographic occlusion rates, ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, mortality, retreatment rates, and favorable clinic outcomes were included. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the overall outcome rates of anterior cerebral artery(ACA) vs. middle cerebral artery(MCA) and anterior vs posterior circulation subgroups. RESULTS: We included 26 studies involving a total of 1,408 patients. The overall rate of complete occlusion was 80.3 % (95 % CI= 76.0-84.1). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the rate of complete occlusion between anterior circulation (78.9 %) and posterior circulation (69.2 %) (p value=0.02). The rate of good clinical outcomes was 92.8 % (95 % CI= 88.8-95.4). The mortality rate was 1.4 % (95 % CI= 0.5-2.7). The overall rate of ischemic complications was 9.5 % (95 % CI= 7.7-11.6), with a comparable difference between anterior circulation (7.7 %) and posterior circulation (12.8 %) (p value=0.07). There was no statistically significant difference in MCA vs ACA subgroups in all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label use of PEDs can be a safe and effective treatment option for intracranial aneurysms. However, there is a need for more prospective, high-quality, non-industry-funded registry studies and randomized trials to test the efficacy and safety of off-label usage of PEDs and to expand its indications.
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic , Intracranial Aneurysm , Off-Label Use , Humans , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy , Intracranial Aneurysm/mortality , Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Aged , Adult , Risk Assessment , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/mortalityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of 90Y radioembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) in a multicenter registry. METHODS: One hundred-seventy patients with NELM were enrolled in the registry (NCT02685631). Prior treatments included hepatic resection (n = 23, 14%), arterial therapy (n = 62, 36%), octreotide (n = 119, 83%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (n = 58, 41%), biologic therapy (n = 49, 33%) and immunotherapy (n = 10, 6%). Seventy-seven (45%) patients had extrahepatic disease. Seventy-eight (48%), 61 (37%), and 25 (15%) patients were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or ≥ 2. Tumor grade was known in 81 (48%) patients: 57 (70%) were well-, 12 (15%) moderate-, and 12 (15%) poorly-differentiated. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank tests were performed to compare overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) by tumor location and grade. Toxicities were reported using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.5. Cox Proportional Hazards were calculated for pancreatic primary, performance status, extrahepatic disease at treatment, unilobar treatment, baseline ascites, and > 25% tumor burden. RESULTS: One, 2, and 3-year OS rates were 75, 62 and 46%, respectively. Median OS was 33 months [(95% CI: 25-not reached (NR)]. The longest median OS was in patients with pancreatic (42 months, 95% CI: 33-NR) and hindgut 41 months, 95% CI: 12-NR) primaries. The shortest OS was in foregut primaries (26 months; 95% CI: 23-NR; X2 = 7, p = 0.1). Median OS of well-differentiated tumors was 36 months (95% CI: 10-NR), compared to 44 (95% CI: 7-NR) and 25 (95% CI: 3-NR) months for moderate and poorly differentiated tumors. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25 months with 1, 2, and 3-year PFS rates of 70, 54, and 35%, respectively. Thirteen patients (7.6%) developed grade 3 hepatic toxicity, most commonly new ascites (n = 8, 5%) at a median of 5.5 months. Performance status of ≥2 (HR 2.7, p = 0.01) and baseline ascites (HR 2.8, P = 0.049) predicted shorter OS. DISCUSSION: In a population with a high incidence of extrahepatic disease, 90Y was effective and safe in treatment of NELM, with median OS of 41 months for well differentiated tumors. Grade 3 or greater hepatic toxicity was developed in 7.6% of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02685631 .
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/radiotherapy , Yttrium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Aged , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/mortality , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Registries , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Management strategies for pseudoaneurysm rupture after pancreatic resection have not yet been firmly established due to its low incidence and effects of environmental variability among centers. This study aimed to provide a basis for treatment strategy improvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical features and outcomes of 29 patients who experienced pseudoaneurysm formation or rupture following pancreatic resection were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The incidence of pseudoaneurysm formation was 2.8%. In 28 of 29 patients, pseudoaneurysm was identified via emergent dynamic computed tomography (CT). The rates of complete cessation of bleeding by interventional radiology (IVR) and surgical intervention were 88% and 100%, respectively. Mortality rate was 13.8%. Four patients treated by IVR died, including three of massive bleeding and one of liver failure. CONCLUSION: Patients with suspected pseudoaneurysm rupture after pancreatic resection should undergo immediate CT. Open surgery is preferable for patients with incomplete hemostasis by IVR or those who cannot immediately undergo IVR, however, IVR is an effective alternative.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm, False/therapy , Aneurysm, Ruptured/therapy , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endovascular Procedures , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aneurysm, False/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, False/etiology , Aneurysm, False/mortality , Aneurysm, Ruptured/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, Ruptured/etiology , Aneurysm, Ruptured/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography, Interventional , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Time Factors , Tokyo , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To study the impact of transarterial Yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE) in combination with second-line systemic chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: In this international, multicenter, open-label phase III trial, patients with CLM who progressed on oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive second-line chemotherapy with or without TARE. The two primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic PFS (hPFS), assessed by blinded independent central review. Random assignment was performed using a web- or voice-based system stratified by unilobar or bilobar disease, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based first-line chemotherapy, and KRAS mutation status. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-eight patients from 95 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia were randomly assigned to chemotherapy with or without TARE; this represents the intention-to-treat population and included 215 patients in the TARE plus chemotherapy group and 213 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; 1-sided P = .0013), with a median PFS of 8.0 (95% CI, 7.2 to 9.2) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. The HR for hPFS was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; 1-sided P < .0001), with a median hPFS of 9.1 (95% CI, 7.8 to 9.7) and 7.2 (95% CI, 5.7 to 7.6) months, respectively. Objective response rates were 34.0% (95% CI, 28.0 to 40.5) and 21.1% (95% CI, 16.2 to 27.1; 1-sided P = .0019) for the TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Median overall survival was 14.0 (95% CI, 11.8 to 15.5) and 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 16.4; 1-sided P = .7229) with a HR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.32) for TARE and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Grade 3 adverse events were reported more frequently with TARE (68.4% v 49.3%). Both groups received full chemotherapy dose intensity. CONCLUSION: The addition of TARE to systemic therapy for second-line CLM led to longer PFS and hPFS. Further subset analyses are needed to better define the ideal patient population that would benefit from TARE.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Yttrium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Irinotecan/administration & dosage , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of risk factors for poor outcomes from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) varies widely and has not been fully elucidated to date in Vietnam. Understanding the risk and prognosis of aneurysmal SAH is important to reduce poor outcomes in Vietnam. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate the rate of poor outcome at 90 days of ictus and associated factors from aneurysmal SAH in the country. METHODS: We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients (≥18 years) presenting with aneurysmal SAH to three central hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam, from August 2019 to August 2020. We collected data on the characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with aneurysmal SAH and compared these data between good (defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0 to 3) and poor (mRS, 4-6) outcomes at 90 days of ictus. We assessed factors associated with poor outcomes using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 168 patients with aneurysmal SAH, 77/168 (45.8%) were men, and the median age was 57 years (IQR: 48-67). Up to 57/168 (33.9%) of these patients had poor outcomes at 90 days of ictus. Most patients underwent sudden-onset and severe headache (87.5%; 147/168) and were transferred from local to participating central hospitals (80.4%, 135/168), over half (57.1%, 92/161) of whom arrived in central hospitals after 24 hours of ictus, and the initial median World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grading score was 2 (IQR: 1-4). Nearly half of the patients (47.0%; 79/168) were treated with endovascular coiling, 37.5% (63/168) were treated with surgical clipping, the remaining patients (15.5%; 26/168) did not receive aneurysm repair, and late rebleeding and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) occurred in 6.1% (10/164) and 10.4% (17/163) of patients, respectively. An initial WFNS grade of IV (odds ratio, OR: 15.285; 95% confidence interval, CI: 3.096-75.466) and a grade of V (OR: 162.965; 95% CI: 9.975-2662.318) were independently associated with poor outcomes. Additionally, both endovascular coiling (OR: 0.033; 95% CI: 0.005-0.235) and surgical clipping (OR: 0.046; 95% CI: 0.006-0.370) were inversely and independently associated with poor outcome. Late rebleeding (OR: 97.624; 95% CI: 5.653-1686.010) and DCI (OR: 15.209; 95% CI: 2.321-99.673) were also independently associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements are needed in the management of aneurysmal SAH in Vietnam, such as increasing the number of aneurysm repairs, performing earlier aneurysm treatment by surgical clipping or endovascular coiling, and improving both aneurysm repairs and neurocritical care.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Ruptured/surgery , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Intracranial Aneurysm/surgery , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/mortality , Aged , Aneurysm, Ruptured/pathology , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Intracranial Aneurysm/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/etiology , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/pathology , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , VietnamABSTRACT
Dual-eligible beneficiaries, individuals with both Medicare and Medicaid coverage, represent a high-cost and vulnerable population; however, literature regarding outcomes is sparse. We characterized outcomes in dual-eligible beneficiaries treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) compared to Medicare only, Medicaid only, private insurance, and self-pay. A 10-year cross-sectional study of the National Inpatient Sample was conducted. Adult aSAH emergency admissions treated by neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling were included. Multivariable regression was used to adjust for confounders. A total of 57,666 patients met inclusion criteria. Dual-eligibles comprised 2.8% of admissions and were on average younger (62.4 years) than Medicare (70.0 years), older than all other groups, and had higher mean National Inpatient Sample-Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Severity Scores than all other groups (p ≤ 0.001). Among patients treated by clipping, dual-eligibles were less often discharged to home compared to Medicare (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.30-0.87, p < 0.05) and all other insurance groups, p < 0.01. Likewise, those who received coiling were less often discharged to home compared to Medicaid (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.23-0.73), private (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.23-0.76) and self-pay patients (aOR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.12-0.46). They also had increased odds of poor National Inpatient Sample-Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcome Measures compared to Medicaid, private, and self-pay patients, all p < 0.05. There were no differences in inpatient mortality or total complications. In conclusion, dual-eligible patients had higher aSAH severity scores, less often discharged home, and among patients who received coiling, dual-eligibles had increased odds of poor outcome. Dual-eligible patients with aSAH represent a vulnerable population that may benefit from targeted clinical and public policy initiatives.
Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy , Neurosurgical Procedures , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Embolization, Therapeutic/statistics & numerical data , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Medicaid , Medicare , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures/mortality , Neurosurgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Odds Ratio , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/therapy , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Endosaccular treatment is the backbone of endovascular treatment for acutely ruptured aneurysms. Stent-assisted coiling is a niche technique in this context. Data on X-stenting or Y-stenting (dual crossing stenting, DCS) in the acute phase after subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) are scarce, and the impact of stent properties on the outcome is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and imaging results of DCS in patients treated for aSAH. METHODS: Patients with aSAH treated with DCS were evaluated retrospectively. Patient and procedural characteristics were evaluated to determine clinical outcomes, associated complications, and follow-up imaging findings. RESULTS: Sixteen procedures (16 patients; 10 women, mean age 55.8) were performed within 3.2 ± 2.6 days (range 1-10 days) of aSAH. Only the latest generation of intracranial stents (dual Neuroform Atlas-12 cases, dual Leo Baby-2 cases, Neuroform Atlas with Acclino Flex, or Leo Baby-2 cases) were used. Technical success rate was 100%; however, 25% of the procedures were complicated, leading to adverse events in 3 procedures (18.8%; 2 stent thrombosis, 1aneurysm rupture). Procedure-related morbidity and mortality and overall permanent morbidity and mortality were 6.3%, none, 6.3%, and 12.5%, respectively. No additional neurologic events were noted on a mean clinical follow-up of 160 ± 156 (range: 1-540) days. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings and the patient-by-patient data we extracted from the literature suggest that DCS can be performed with new-generation, low-profile stents in aSAH if a definite procedural risk is acceptable for a specific patient. New-generation open-cell stent combinations appear as a viable choice for DCS in aSAH.
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Stents , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aneurysm, Ruptured , Cerebral Angiography , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Stents/adverse effects , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of transarterial embolization (TAE) for bleeding in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and to evaluate the prognostic factors after TAE. STUDY DESIGN: Outcome study. METHODS: This retrospective study included 31 consecutive patients (27 men and 4 women; median age, 61 years) who presented uncontrollable hemorrhage associated with HNC and underwent emergency TAE at our institution during a 10-year period (January 2011-December 2020). This corresponded to 40 TAE procedures, including 27 cases with an unstable status (circulatory and/or respiratory insufficiency) and 10 cases with carotid blowout syndrome. The technical success rate and adverse events were analyzed on a per-procedure basis. The rebleeding and overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed on a per-patient basis, and the factors related to OS were evaluated. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%. As an adverse event, cerebral infarction was found in three cases with carotid blowout syndrome. The rebleeding rate at 30 days after TAE and in the follow-up period (range, 9-3,004 days) was 17.2% and 35.5%, respectively. The median survival time was 263 days (95% confidence interval: 124.0-402.0 days). In the log-rank test, complete remission (CR) of the primary cancer at the time of the first TAE was identified as a significant influencing factor of survival. CONCLUSION: TAE is effective for the treatment of hemorrhage associated with HNC even in patients with an unstable status. Patients with CR can gain a long life span. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2777-E2783, 2021.
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiography/methods , Carotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Arteries/pathology , Cerebral Infarction/epidemiology , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Rupture/diagnosis , Rupture/epidemiology , Survival RateABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The long-term success of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is limited by complications, most importantly endoleaks. In case of (persistent) type I endoleak (T1EL), secondary intervention is indicated to prevent secondary aneurysm rupture. Different treatment options are suggested for T1ELs, such as endo anchors, (fenestrated) cuffs, embolization, or open conversion. Currently, the treatment of T1EL with liquid embolic agents is available; however, results are not yet addressed. This review presents the safety and efficacy of embolization with liquid embolic agents for treatment of T1ELs after EVAR. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for all studies reporting the use of liquid embolic agents as monotherapy for treatment of T1ELs after EVAR. Patient numbers, technical success (successful delivery of liquid embolics in the T1EL) and clinical success (absence of aneurysm related death, endoleak recurrence or additional interventions during follow-up) were examined. RESULTS: Of 1604 articles, 10 studies met the selection criteria, including 194 patients treated with liquid embolics; 73.2% of the patients were male with a median age of 71 years. The overall technical success was 97.9%. Clinical success was 87.6%. Because the median follow-up was only 13.0 months (range, 1-89 months), data on long-term success are almost absent. Four cases (2.1%) of secondary aneurysm rupture after embolization owing to endoleak recurrence were reported. All ruptures occurred in aneurysms exceeding initial treatment diameter of 70 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Initial technical success after liquid embolization for T1EL is high, although long-term clinical success rates are lacking. Within this review, the risk of secondary rupture is comparable with untreated T1EL at 2% with a median follow-up of 13 months, regardless of the initial success of embolization. In general, no decrease in secondary aneurysm rupture after embolization of T1EL after EVAR is demonstrated, although the results of late embolization are debated.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endoleak/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Dimethyl Sulfoxide/administration & dosage , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Enbucrilate/administration & dosage , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/etiology , Endoleak/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Polyvinyls/administration & dosage , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Thrombin/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Previous reports on transarterial treatment for lung cancer were reviewed. The bronchial arterial infusion therapy has a long history since 1964. Better local control with less doses of anti-neoplastic agents was warranted by trying transarterial administration to lung and mediastinal tumors. It is reported that both primary and metastatic tumors are fed by bronchial or other systemic arteries. The bronchial arterial embolization for hemoptysis has been introduced for clinical practice since 1973. Hemoptysis by not only benign but also malignant diseases has been well controlled by embolization. In recent decades, the technical elements for transarterial treatments have markedly improved. They make it possible to carry out precise procedures of selective catheter insertion to the tumor relating arteries. Current concepts of transarterial treatment, technical aspects and treatment outcomes are summarized. Tentative result from chemo-embolization for advanced lung cancer using recent catheter techniques was also described. It provides favorable local control and survival merits. It is considered that a population of lung cancer patients can benefit from transarterial management using small doses of anti-neoplastic agents, with less complications and less medical costs.
Subject(s)
Bronchial Arteries/surgery , Embolization, Therapeutic , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Bronchial Arteries/pathology , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Disease Progression , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Hemoptysis/etiology , Hemoptysis/pathology , Hemoptysis/therapy , Humans , Lung/blood supply , Lung/pathology , Lung/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Adjunctive false lumen embolization (FLE) with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with chronic aortic dissection is thought to induce FL thrombosis and favorable aortic remodeling. However, these data are derived from small single-institution experiences and the potential benefit of FLE remains unproven. In this study, we examined perioperative and midterm outcomes of patients with aortic dissection undergoing concomitant TEVAR and FLE.* METHODS: : Patients 18 or older who underwent TEVAR for chronic aortic dissection with known FLE status in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database between January 2010 and February 2020 were included. Ruptured patients and emergent procedures were excluded. Patient characteristics, operative details and outcomes were analyzed by group: TEVAR with or without FLE. Primary outcomes were in-hospital post-operative complications and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included follow-up mean maximum aortic diameter change, rates of false lumen thrombosis, re-intervention rates, and mortality. RESULTS: 884 patients were included: 46 had TEVAR/FLE and 838 had TEVAR alone. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, prior aortic interventions, mean maximum pre-operative aortic diameter (5.1cm vs. 5.0cm, P=0.43), presentation symptomatology, or intervention indication. FLE was associated with significantly longer procedural times (178min vs. 146min, P=0.0002), increased contrast use (134mL vs. 113mL, P=0.02), and prolonged fluoroscopy time (34min vs. 21min, P<0.0001). However, FLE was not associated with a significant difference in post-operative complications (17.4% vs. 13.8%, P=0.51), length of stay (6.5 vs. 5.7 days, P=0.18), or in-hospital all-cause mortality (0% vs. 1.3%, P=1). In mid-term follow-up (median 15.5months, IQR 2.2-36.2 months), all-cause mortality trended lower, but was not significant (2.2% vs. 7.8%); and Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in overall survival between groups (P=0.23). By Cox regression analysis, post-operative complications had the strongest independent association with all-cause mortality (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.56-4.5, P<0.001). In patients with available follow-up imaging and re-intervention status, mean aortic diameter change (n=337, -0.71cm vs. -0.69cm, P=0.64) and re-intervention rates (n=487, 10% vs. 11.4%, P=1) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive FLE, despite increased procedural times, can be performed safely for patients with chronic dissection without significantly higher overall perioperative morbidity or mortality. TEVAR/FLE demonstrates trends for improved survival and increased rates of FL thrombosis in the treated thoracic segment; however, given the lack of evidence to suggest a significant reduction in re-intervention rates or induction of more favorable aortic remodeling compared to TEVAR alone, the overall utility of this technique in practice remains unclear. Further investigation is needed to determine the most appropriate role for FLE in managing chronic aortic dissections.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endovascular Procedures , Aged , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/mortality , Aortic Dissection/physiopathology , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/physiopathology , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Chronic Disease , Databases, Factual , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular RemodelingABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multicenter, real-world data registry using transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with resin microspheres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 448 patients with HCC were treated at 36 centers between 2015 and 2019. Treatment history, baseline laboratory and imaging, and treatment goal were assessed. OS and PFS were stratified using Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) and Child-Pugh (CP) classifications. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared OS and PFS with 95% confidence intervals. Transplants were tracked. Toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Cox proportional hazard of baseline demographics assessed factors affecting survival. RESULTS: Prior chemoembolization and systemic therapy were used in 107 (26%) and 68 (16%) patients, respectively. Using the BCLC staging system, 66 patients (19%) were BCLC A and 202, 51, and 26 were BCLC B, C, and D, respectively. Median OS for patients with BCLC A disease was not achieved at 30 months. Median OS for patients with BCLC B, C, and D disease were 19.5, 13.6, and 11.5 months, respectively (P = .0006). Median PFS for patients with BCLC A, B, C, and D were 19.8, 10.0, 6.3, and 5.9 months, respectively (P = .003). Twenty patients underwent transplantation, representing 14 of 43 (33%) and 6 of 28 (21%) patients who underwent bridging and downstaging therapy, respectively. Common Grade 3 toxicities were encephalopathy (11/448, 2.5%), hyperbilirubinemia (10/448, 2.2%), and ascites (9/448, 2.0%). Factors predicting longer survival included CP A (χ2 = 4.2, P = .04) and BCLC A (χ2 = 5.2, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In a frequently pretreated patient cohort with disease burden in 81% beyond the Milan criteria, TARE with resin microspheres provided OS comparable to other studies in this multicenter registry.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy , Embolization, Therapeutic , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Disease Progression , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Microspheres , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Prospective Studies , Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Registries , Time FactorsABSTRACT
The present systematic review determined the role of transarterial embolization (TAE) as a prophylactic treatment in bleeding peptic ulcers after initial successful endoscopic hemostasis. PubMed and Ovid Medline databases were searched from inception until July 2019 for studies that included patients deemed high-risk based on Forrest Classification, Rockall score ≥ 5, or endoscopic evaluation in addition to those who underwent prophylactic TAE after initial successful endoscopic hemostasis. Meta-analysis was performed to compare patients who underwent endoscopic therapy (ET) and TAE with those who underwent ET alone. The primary outcomes measured included rates of rebleeding, reintervention, and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures evaluated length of hospitalization, technical success rates, and complications associated with TAE. Of 916 publications, 5 were eligible for inclusion; 310 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding underwent prophylactic TAE, and 255 were compared against a control group of 580 patients that underwent standard treatment with ET alone. Patients who underwent ET with TAE had lower 30-day rebleeding rates (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.85; P = .02; I2 = 50%). The ET with TAE group had a lower 30-day mortality rate (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10-0.83; P = .02; I2 = 58%). There was no difference in pooled reintervention rates (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43-1.08; P = .10; I2 = 0%) and length of hospitalization (mean difference, -0.32; 95% CI, -1.88 to 1.24; P = .69; I2 = 0%). Technical success rate of prophylactic TAE was 90.5% (95% CI, 83.09-97.98; I2 = 75.9%). Pooled proportion of overall complication rate was 0.18% (95% CI, 0.00-1.28; I2 = 0%). Prophylactic TAE has lower rebleeding and mortality with a good success rate and low complications. Prophylactic TAE after primary ET may be recommended for selected patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers; however, further studies should be performed to establish this as a routine tool in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer disease.
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic , Hemostasis, Endoscopic , Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Peptic Ulcer/therapy , Aged , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Female , Hemostasis, Endoscopic/adverse effects , Hemostasis, Endoscopic/mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Peptic Ulcer/diagnosis , Peptic Ulcer/mortality , Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/mortality , Recurrence , Retreatment , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To quantify changes in the management of pediatric patients with isolated splenic injury from 2007 to 2015. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients under 18 years old with registered splenic injury in the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2015) were identified. Splenic injuries were categorized into 5 management types: nonoperative management (NOM), embolization, splenic repair, splenectomy, or a combination therapy. Linear mixed models accounting for confounding variables were used to examine the direct impact of management on length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) days, and ventilator days. RESULTS: Of included patients (n = 24,128), 90.3% (n = 21,789), 5.6% (n = 1,361), and 2.7% (n = 640) had NOM, splenectomy, and embolization, respectively. From 2007 to 2015, the rate of embolization increased from 1.5% to 3.5%, and the rate of splenectomy decreased from 6.9% to 4.4%. Combining injury grades, NOM was associated with the shortest LOS (5.1 days), ICU days (1.9 days), and ventilator days (0.5 day). Moreover, splenectomy was associated with longer LOS (10.1 days), ICU days (4.5 days), and ventilator days (2.1 days) than NOM. The average failure rate of NOM was 1.5% (180 failures/12,378 cases). Average embolization failure was 1.3% (6 failures/456 cases). Splenic artery embolization was associated with lower mortality than splenectomy (OR: 0.10, P <.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in mortality between embolization and NOM (OR: 0.96, P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric splenic injury, NOM is the most utilized and associated with favorable outcomes, most notably in grades III to V pediatric splenic injury. If intervention is needed, embolization is effective and increasingly utilized most significantly in lower grade injuries.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic , Spleen/surgery , Splenectomy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/mortality , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Combined Modality Therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay , Male , Retrospective Studies , Spleen/diagnostic imaging , Spleen/injuries , Splenectomy/adverse effects , Splenectomy/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortalityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 locoregional therapies (LRTs) including hepatic artery embolization (HAE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in the treatment of patients with metastatic ovarian cancer to the liver. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From October 2010 to May 2019, the data of 15 consecutive patients (median age, 54 years ± 9.8; range, 35-78 years) with hepatic metastatic ovarian cancer who were treated with either HAE (n = 6; 40%) or TARE (n = 9; 60%) were reviewed. The most common histopathologic type was epithelial ovarian carcinoma (80%). The most common chemotherapy regimens used prior to embolization included carboplatin, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and bevacizumab. Patients received a mean of 4 lines ± 3 (range, 1-9) of chemotherapy. All patients with serous carcinoma were resistant to platinum at the time of embolization. Indications for embolization were progression of disease to the liver while receiving chemotherapy in 14 (93.3%) patients and palliative pain control in 1 patient. RESULTS: The overall response rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 92.4%, 85.6%, and 70%, respectively. Median overall survival from the time of LRT was 9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4-14) months. Median local tumor progression was 6.4 months ± 5.03 (95% CI, 3.3-9.5). No grade 3-5 adverse events were detected in either group. CONCLUSIONS: HAE and TARE were well tolerated in patients with metastatic ovarian cancer to the liver and possibly ensured prolonged disease control in heavily treated, predominantly in patients resistant to platinum. Larger numbers are needed to verify these data.
Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/administration & dosage , Embolization, Therapeutic , Gelatin/administration & dosage , Hepatic Artery , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Acrylic Resins/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Disease Progression , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Female , Gelatin/adverse effects , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Middle Aged , New York City , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Particle Size , Progression-Free Survival , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endovascular embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) with liquid n-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) serves multiple purposes including AVM occlusion and flow reduction in preparation for other treatment modalities. The objective was to study the clinical, structural, and angiographic factors affecting complications associated with AVM treatment by sequential n-BCA embolizations for nidal occlusion versus quantitative flow reduction in preparation for surgical resection or radiosurgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent endovascular embolization of cerebral AVM at our institution between 1998 and 2019, during which time the technique of traditional embolization evolved to a strategy of targeted sequential flow reduction guided by serial flow imaging based on quantitative magnetic resonance angiography, in conjunction with a shift away from nidal penetration. RESULTS: Among 251 patients, 47.8% of patients presented with ruptured AVM. On average, each patient underwent 2.4 embolizations, for a total of 613 sessions. Major morbidity related to embolization occurred in 18 (7.2%) patients, but this occurred disproportionately in the traditional embolization strategy (n=16, 8%) in contrast with the flow-targeting strategy (n=2, 3.8%). Four patients (1.6%) died in the overall group, and these all occurred with the traditional embolization strategy (2% of 199 patients); no deaths occurred in the flow-targeting strategy (n=52). CONCLUSION: Embolization with n-BCA targeted to sequential flow reduction and feeder occlusion with limited nidal penetration prior to definitive surgical or radiosurgical treatment can be safely performed with low overall morbidity and mortality.
Subject(s)
Arteriovenous Fistula/mortality , Arteriovenous Fistula/therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Enbucrilate/administration & dosage , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/mortality , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/therapy , Adult , Aged , Arteriovenous Fistula/diagnostic imaging , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Female , Humans , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) embolization for the treatment of aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study conducted from February 2003 to June 2019, NBCA embolization of an aortic false lumen was attempted in 12 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 41-68 y) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed in 53 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 37-70 y) for aortic dissection with one or more indications of persisting pain, malperfusion, rupture or impending rupture, maximal aortic diameter ≥ 55 mm, and/or rapid aortic enlargement. The main exclusion criterion for embolization was the presence of fast blood flow in the aortic false lumen on aortography. The efficacy of NBCA embolization and TEVAR was compared by evaluating technical and clinical outcomes, repeat intervention-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 11 of the 12 patients treated with NBCA embolization (91.7%), and clinical success was achieved in 9 of these 11 (81.8%). No significant difference was found between embolization and TEVAR in clinical success rates (embolization, 81.8%; TEVAR, 84.9%; P = .409) or procedure-related complications (embolization, 1 patient [8.3%]; TEVAR, 4 patients [7.5%]; P = .701). In addition, embolization showed comparable 5-y RFS (embolization, 82.5% ± 9.3; TEVAR, 85.5% ± 4.8; P = .641) and 5-y OS (embolization, 100%; TEVAR, 95.4% ± 3.2; P = .744) rates to TEVAR. CONCLUSIONS: NBCA embolization of the false lumen in aortic dissection seems to be a safe and effective treatment modality for the closure of false lumen in selected patients.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/therapy , Aortic Dissection/therapy , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Embolization, Therapeutic , Enbucrilate/administration & dosage , Endovascular Procedures , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Enbucrilate/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper is to report the different modalities for the treatment of isolated internal iliac artery aneurysms (IIIAA), as well as their outcomes. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature (database searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library; last search: April 2020). We included articles reporting on the outcomes for IIIAA interventions comprising at least 5 patients. Studies were included when presenting extractable outcome data regarding intraoperative and/or early results. We performed meta-analyses of proportions for different outcomes, using random effects model. RESULTS: Thirteen non-randomized studies were included (192 patients with 202 IIIAA). IIIAA were symptomatic in the 18.1% (95%CI 9.3-26.9; I2 54.46%, P = .019). Estimated mean IIIAA diameter was 46.28 mm (95%CI 39.72-52.85; I2 88.85%, P < .001). Open repair was performed in 21/202 cases. Endovascular treatments were: embolization (81/181), embolization and hypogastric artery coverage (79/181), hypogastric artery coverage by stent-grafting (15/181), stent-grafting in the hypogastric artery (6/181). Overall estimated technical success (TS) rate was 91.6% (95% CI 86.8-95.5; I2 45.82%, P = .031). TS rate was 94.5% for open surgery (95%CI 85.3-100; I2 0%, P = .907), and 89.7% for endovascular repair (95%CI 83.8-95.6; I2 55.43%, P = .006). Estimated overall 30-day mortality was 3.1% (95%CI 0.8-5.4; I2 0%, P = .969). Mortality rates after open surgery and endovascular repair were 8.2% (95%CI 3.4-19.8; I2 0%, P = .545) and 2.8% (95%CI 0.5-5.1; I2 0%, P = .994), respectively. Estimated mean follow-up was 32.63 months (95%CI 21.74-43.53; I2 94.45%, P < .001). During this timeframe, IIIAA exclusion was preserved in 92.8% of the patients (95%CI 89.3-96.2; I2 0%, P = .797). Buttock claudication occurred in 13.9% of the patients (95%CI 8.7-19.2; I2 0%, P = .622). CONCLUSIONS: IIIAA are frequently large, and symptomatic at presentation. Several treatments are proposed in literature, open and endovascular, both with good results. The endovascular treatment is the preferred method of treatment in literature, since it offers good short- to mid-term results and low early mortality. Buttock claudication after hypogastric artery exclusion is a common complication.