Outcomes and Quality-of-Life Measures after Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Kadish Stage C Olfactory Neuroblastomas.

OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been applied in the treatment of olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB). However, there is a lack of research examining the impact of EEA on locally advanced ONB. This study assessed the outcomes of EEA in patients with locally advanced ONB and its impact on the quality of life (QOL). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with Kadish stage C ONB who underwent EEA between December 2004 and October 2019 and assessed demographic data, histopathologic grade, the extent of resection, postoperative complications, and outcomes. Preoperative and postoperative QOL was assessed using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (18 men, 8 women; aged 26-79 years) were enrolled, with 12 cases of Hyams grade II and III and 1 case of grade I and IV each. In total, 25 patients received radiotherapy and 16 patients received chemotherapy, of whom 11 received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative nasal bleeding was observed in 2 patients. The follow-up ranged from 8 to 124 months (median, 42.3 months). The 1-year and 5-year overall survival were 96.2% and 84.8%, respectively. The 1-year and 5-year disease-free survival were 76.9% each. The analysis of the postoperative Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores showed significant improvement in certain psychological and sleep-associated domains, compared with the preoperative scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that pure EEA followed by radiotherapy offered excellent outcomes in the management of selected patients with locally advanced ONB. The postoperative QOL was significantly improved. More research is required on neoadjuvant chemotherapy to establish its role.

Using Augmented Reality to Reduce Fear and Promote Cooperation During Pediatric Otolaryngologic Procedures.

This case series examines interactive AR during minor otolaryngologic procedures. Although VR has been successfully used for pediatric vascular access, removing children from comforting people in the real world has resulted in patient anxiety. AR offers a potential advantage, utilizing distracting holographic images when patients maintain eye contact with parents. The primary objective was to determine the effect of AR on fear during pediatric otolaryngologic procedures. Secondary objectives included evaluating pain; procedure compliance; and patient, parent and physician attitudes toward AR, as well as assessing the feasibility of adding AR to a busy outpatient otolaryngologic clinic. Laryngoscope, 131:E1342-E1344, 2021.

Virtual Reality as Distraction Analgesia and Anxiolysis for Pediatric Otolaryngology Procedures.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: While virtual reality (VR) has been used as analgesia and anxiolysis for invasive procedures, no literature exists on the use of VR in the pediatric otolaryngology setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of VR in reducing pain and anxiety for pediatric otolaryngology patients. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 53 patients aged 7-17 undergoing in-office nasal endoscopies were included. Patients were randomized to receive VR or standard of care. Procedural pain, anxiety, and satisfaction scores were recorded from patients and caregivers. The physician filled out a childhood emotional manifestation scale (CEMS). RESULTS: Patients in VR group reported a significant decrease in pain (0.80 ± 1.06 vs. 2.26 ± 2.38, P = .018) and anxiety (9.50 ± 12.48 vs. 38.48 ± 29.83, P = .0002) and increase in procedural satisfaction (6.40 ± 0.77 vs. 4.74 ± 1.74, P = .0002) compared to patients in control group. CEMS scores were significantly reduced in VR group (5.15 ± 0.46 vs. 9.64 ± 5.66, P = .0001) and caregiver anxiety levels were significantly reduced in VR group (11.50 ± 17.67 vs. 27.39 ± 30.48, P = .041) compared to control group. There were no reported side effects. Procedural time did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: For pediatric otolaryngology patients undergoing in-office nasal endoscopies, VR is a safe and effective form of distraction analgesia and anxiolysis, significantly reducing pain and increasing procedural satisfaction for patients. In addition, VR significantly reduces anxiety for both patients and caregivers without disrupting procedural efficiency and workflow. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. Laryngoscope, 131:E1714-E1721, 2021.

Otolaryngology residents' perceptions of endoscopic ear surgery during surgical training.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of endoscopic ear surgery has implications for the training of otolaryngology residents. OBJECTIVES: To report on the status of endoscopic ear surgery and assess the effects of this new technology on otolaryngology training in Singapore, from the residents' perspective. METHODS: An anonymous survey was conducted amongst all Singaporean otolaryngology residents. Residents' exposure to, and perceptions of, endoscopic ear surgery were assessed. RESULTS: Residents from institutions that practise endoscopic ear surgery were more positive regarding its efficacy in various otological surgical procedures. Of residents in programmes with exposure to endoscopic ear surgery, 82.4 per cent felt that its introduction had adversely affected their training, with 88.3 per cent of residents agreeing that faculty members' learning of endoscopic ear surgery had decreased their hands-on surgical load. Both groups expressed desire for more experience with endoscopy. CONCLUSION: The majority of residents view endoscopic ear surgery as an expanding field with a potentially negative impact on their training. Mitigating measures should be implemented to minimise its negative impact on residents' training.

Quality of Life in Treating Persistent Neurogenic Dysphagia with Cricopharyngeal Myotomy.

Neurological impairment is an important cause of dysphagia. This study analyzed whether quality of life (QoL) is improved after coblation-assisted endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (CAECPM) for patients with persistent neurological dysphagia who meet the criteria by using the Chinese version of the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CSWAL-QOL). 22 patients with dysphagia for more than 6 months after stroke or lateral skull base surgery were screened. All patients exhibited a poor response to conservative treatment such as swallowing rehabilitation. Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) showed a restricted cricopharyngeal opening. The preoperative CSWAL-QOL score was 377.7 (311.3-493.0) out of 1000; the postoperative score was 641.7 (293.7-758.3) out of 1000; the preoperative median dysphagia frequency was 41.4 (25.7-61.4) out of 100; and the postoperative median score was 64.3 (24.3-80.0). A significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative scores together with dysphagia frequency (P < 0.05). Among all the variables, laryngeal elevation ability was statistically significantly correlated with efficacy of CAECPM (P = 0.01). These values indicate that quality of life could be improved after CAECPM for patients with persistent neurological dysphagia, who have cricopharyngeal achalasia. The ability of laryngeal elevation has significant influence. The CSWAL-QOL can be used to assess different aspects of the swallow-related quality of life of these patients.

Hybrid Robotics for Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: Preclinical Evaluation and Surgeon First Impression.

BACKGROUND: A robotic endoscope holder should theoretically provide various advantages in transnasal endoscopic skull base surgery, but only recently has a robotic system become commercially available. The objective of this study was to provide a preclinical evaluation of potential advantages and surgeon first impression of this robotic hybrid solution. METHODS: Thirty skull base surgeons, attending the Joint European Diploma of Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery 2018-2019 in Paris, France, were enrolled. A questionnaire, mainly concerning personal surgical experience and habits, was administered. The test phase consisted of 2 different dry-lab tasks, performed with and without EndoscopeRobot, according to randomization and on 2 different days. A modified NASA Task Load Index test was subsequently administered via e-mail to all participants. Completion times and modified Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills in Endoscopy scores of the videotaped tasks were recorded. RESULTS: Nineteen otorhinolaryngologic surgeons and 11 neurosurgeons, with different surgical habits and endoscopic experience, were enrolled. No one appeared unfavorable a priori to robotic endoscopic surgery. Although the robot did not provide an advantage in the simple grasping task 1, a trend toward better completion times and efficacy was evident in the bimanual task 2, when performed with the robot and bimanually. According to the modified NASA Task Load Index test, surgeons felt more successful with the robot in task 2, finding it less stressful and mentally demanding. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic skull base surgeons seem to view a hybrid robotic solution positively. EndoscopeRobot seems to provide a benefit to the single surgeon with experience in bimanual endoscopic surgery. Further preclinical and clinical evaluation of this technology is necessary.

Efficacy of novel sedation using the combination of dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, ESD can be difficult when patients move due to insufficient sedation. We conducted a prospective confirmatory single arm study to evaluate the efficacy of using dexmedetomidine (DEX) in combination with midazolam as a novel sedation for ESD. METHODS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed without intubation in 65 patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who did not move or require restraint during ESD, compared to historical control of ESD performed under midazolam sedation. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of complications and self-report questionnaires from patients and endoscopists. RESULTS: Restraint was not required in 97% of patients sedated using the combination of DEX and midazolam. Depressed respiration, low blood pressure, and bradycardia occurred in 23, 37, and 26% of patients, respectively. All patients recovered without severe complication. Occurrence of low blood pressure and bradycardia were higher, while respiratory depression was lower for the combination group than for the historical control group. The amount of midazolam used was significantly lower than in the control. Of note, 94% of patients had no painful sensations, with 3 reporting chest pain and 3 having a recollection of the procedure. Endoscopists were satisfied with the sedation in 94% of cases. All lesions were resected in en bloc fashion, without perforation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of DEX and midazolam provided effective sedation for ESD for ESCC.

Video or verbal? A randomised trial of the informed consent process prior to endoscopy.

AIM: Informed consent (IC) prior to endoscopy is often inconsistently and poorly performed. We compared use of video-assisted consent to standard verbal consent for enhancing patients' recollection of procedural risks, understanding and fulfilment of expectation. METHOD: Two hundred patients attending for gastroscopy or colonoscopy were randomised to either video-assisted consent (n=100) or verbal consent (n=100). The primary outcomes measured via a questionnaire were the recollection of procedural risks (sum of all correct answers for risk recall items) and patient experience compared to information provided in the consent process. Secondary outcomes included reported patient understanding and staff satisfaction between groups. RESULTS: There was no difference between video or verbal groups in terms of risk recall scores (p=0.46), with less than half the patients able to recall more than two risks. There was a signal towards improved recall of bleeding as a potential risk in the video as compared to the verbal arm but it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.059). Patients' perceived understanding and fulfilment of expectation was high (>96%) in both groups. Seventy-one percent of the staff preferred using the video over the verbal IC. CONCLUSION: Video-assisted consent made no significant difference to the IC process in terms of patient recollection or experience compared to usual verbal IC. Despite very poor recollection of procedural risks, patients in both the video and verbal groups reported understanding of the procedure and satisfaction with the IC process. Reasons for this mismatch are unclear. Further action to prioritise information delivery during IC is required. Future studies in this field should include patient-centred outcomes as a measure of success.

Longitudinal analysis of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy regarding patient-reported satisfaction and cosmesis outcomes.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To compare longitudinal patient-reported cosmesis of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) to that of conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (CLA). METHODS: A total of 23, 15, and 9 patients underwent transumbilical LESS-A (TU-LESS), subcostal LESS-A (SC-LESS), and CLA, respectively. A questionnaire was administered asking the patient to assess wound pain (0: not painful to 10: very painful), satisfaction (0: not satisfied to 10: very satisfied), and cosmesis (0: very ugly to 10: very beautiful) on the basis of a visual analogue scale. We mailed questionnaires to all patients who received LESS-A and CLA at postoperative 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the pain scores between TU-LESS, SC-LESS, and CLA at every time point. In the CLA group, the cosmesis and satisfaction scores were significantly lower at postoperative 3 months (p = 0.0033, 0.0130). There were no significant inter-group differences in the cosmesis score between the three groups after postoperative 6 months. However, the satisfaction score of SC-LESS decreased after postoperative 3 months and was significantly lower at postoperative 9 and 12 months (p = 0.0333, 0.0160). The difference between the satisfaction scores of each procedure gradually increased after postoperative 6 months. CONCLUSION: This study is the first comprehensive longitudinal analysis of patient-reported satisfaction and cosmesis outcomes between LESS-A and CLA. The resulting data provide important insights into the improvement in satisfaction in patients who underwent TU-LESS. These findings can facilitate the treatment decision-making process for patients who are considering laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Long-term follow-up of endoscopic totally extraperitoneal direct inguinal hernia repair using the Endoloop technique.

INTRODUCTION: The pre-tied suture Endoloop™ technique for plication of the weakened transversalis fascia is efficient in post-operative seroma prevention, after laparoscopic/endoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair. No studies have evaluated long-term tolerability of this new technique in regards to chronic pain and hernia recurrence. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal evaluation study of consecutive patients treated with Endoloop™ for M2 or M3 direct defects, during endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach. Meshes were secured with fibrin sealant only. All patients had a minimum 2.8 years (median 5.9 years) follow-up. First outcome was chronic groin/testicular pain; secondary outcome parameters included hernia recurrence and Quality of Life (QoL). Patients were assessed by phone interview using the validated Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), questioned regarding recurrence and asked to present for clinical review as needed. RESULTS: 112 patients (median age 57 years) with 141 direct hernia defects were included during the study period of 2008-2014. An Endoloop™ was used on 127 occasions-79 M2 and 48 M3 direct hernias. One patient had an early recurrence requiring an open repair and was therefore excluded. Thirty-three of the remaining one hundred and eleven patients (29.7%) were lost to long-term follow-up. According to their CCS range, 70 patients (88.6%) were very satisfied with their results, 8 (10.1%) were satisfied, and only one patient (1.3%) who reported chronic groin pain was unsatisfied. There was no reported long-term hernia recurrence. CONCLUSION: The PDS Endoloop™ technique for closure of direct inguinal hernia defects is well tolerated with low risk of hernia recurrence, chronic pain, and excellent QoL. This reliability persists to long-term follow-up.

Adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis identify symptoms and quality of life as the most important outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Well informed patients who are in cohesive partnership with physicians and who have realistic expectations towards therapy are more likely to be adherent, which results in better disease control. AIM: To assess which therapy goals adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis consider relevant. METHODS: Following refinement during three focus groups, a study brochure and questionnaire were sent to 148 patients. Patients ranked the importance (five levels) of short-term (in the next 3 months) and long-term (≥1 year) treatment effect on symptoms, quality of life (QoL), histologically-detected inflammation and fibrosis, endoscopically-detected inflammation, and stricture formation as well as achieving histological remission while asymptomatic. Patients' characteristics associated with treatment goals were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 109 respondents (mean age 43 years), 85 were men. Over 90% chose symptoms and QoL improvement as important short- and long-term therapy goals. A greater proportion attributed more importance to long-term reduction in endoscopic (90% vs 73%, P < 0.001) and histological (81% vs 62%, P = 0.002) inflammation, and histologically-detected fibrosis (79% vs 64%, P = 0.018) when compared to short-term reduction in these features. Patients (88%) ranked achieving histological remission while being asymptomatic as important. Gender, therapy use, education level, QoL, symptom severity, and history of dilation were associated with patients' choice of treatment goals. CONCLUSIONS: Patients attributed most importance to improvement in symptoms and QoL. Reduction in biological activity was judged less important, but more relevant in the long- compared to the short-term.

Development and validation of a quality of life instrument for patients with laryngeal cleft.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a novel pediatric health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) instrument for patients with laryngeal cleft and their families. METHODS: We surveyed primary caregivers of patients that underwent endoscopic repair of Type I or II laryngeal cleft. The proposed HR-QoL instrument consists of 40 items representing four domains, assessing the patient's physical symptoms, the patient's and family's social functioning, and the family's emotions regarding the patient's illness pre- and post-operatively. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to assess construct validity, dimensionality, and optimal simple structure. RESULTS: Of 78 eligible participants reached by phone, 40 (51%) of them completed the questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that all four measured constructs were well supported by the measured items in comparison to a unidimensional model. All factor loadings and factor correlations were significant and factor correlations ranged between 0.723 and 0.879. Indices of test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability were well above recommended standards. There was a significant correlation between current instrument and PedsQL™ score. The overall QoL score significantly improved from 112.3 (±28.1) before surgery to 158.0 (±28.5) after surgery (mean difference 45.7; 95% CI: 37.3, 54.1; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our proposed pediatric HR-QoL instrument is a valid tool for measuring quality of life in patients with laryngeal cleft and their families. This instrument can provide insight into the effects of medical and surgical therapy and guide pre- and post-operative management of laryngeal cleft.

The impact of video nasal endoscopy on patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Video nasal endoscopy has significant associated expense for practices, but its use has been justified by the benefit it provides to the examiner. No study has examined the perceived benefit to the patient. In this study, the impact of video endoscopy on patient satisfaction is evaluated. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study was performed on new patients receiving care in the rhinology clinics of a tertiary-care center. Patients were randomized into the standard endoscopic examination (SEE) or video endoscopic examination (VEE) groups. SEE patients had their examination performed with the physician viewing the exam through the eyepiece, without a video camera, and subsequently had their examination explained. VEE patients had their examination performed with a video camera attached to the scope, recorded, and then used for the explanation. All patients were asked to complete the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and the 18-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (PSQ-18). Statistical analysis was performed to identify differences between cohorts. RESULTS: There was no significant demographic difference between groups. SNOT-22 total and domain scores were similar between both groups (p > 0.05). VEE patients had significantly higher general satisfaction (p = 0.048) and communication (p = 0.028) domains within the PSQ-18. There was no difference between other domains (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: VEE is a valuable tool for otolaryngologists and patients. Further studies evaluating variance in patient compliance and symptomatology may provide further justification for its use.

Quality of life outcomes after endoscopic approaches to intracranial tumors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the literature on quality of life (QOL) in endoscopic approaches to anterior and central intracranial skull-base disease. As endoscopic surgical techniques have gained widespread acceptance and complications and morbidity remain low and comparable with microscopic and open approaches, a shift to focusing on patients' perception of their own well being as an important outcome parameter has been made. In addition to the traditional measurements of surgical outcomes (extent of resection, recurrence rate, morbidity, survival, and complication rate), the success of a surgery can now be assessed using QOL measures. RECENT FINDINGS: The main tools for assessing QOL in endoscopic skull-base surgery (anterior skull-base questionnaire and 22-item sinonasal outcome test) were not specifically designed for endoscopic skull-base approaches, and recently, a new tool was introduced and validated, the skull-base inventory, adding to our armamentarium, but it has not yet been widely employed. Endoscopic skull-base surgery leads to improved or sustained long-term QOL overall but it is significantly influenced by tumor disease. Specific endoscopic surgical technique (such as nasoseptal flap closure) appears to have less impact on QOL. SUMMARY: It is becoming critical to assess therapeutic interventions in terms of impact on a patient's QOL. QOL can be useful in comparing efficacy of surgical interventions, and in the future, it will likely become a reportable indicator of surgical outcome and guide our surgical technique recommendations. Large-scale prospective multicenter trials would be beneficial.

Delayed complications from expanded endonasal surgery for intracranial tumors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Delayed complications after endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base, defined as complications greater than 1 month postoperatively, are uncommon. These complications are divided into categories including sinonasal, neuroanatomic, endocrine and vascular. This review highlights the most up-to-date advancements and reviews the management of delayed complications for skull base patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Over the last 10 years, the field of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery has expanded with new data highlighting the long-term patient outcomes. The majority of patients experience increased quality of life (QOL) after these interventions. However, delayed complications including alterations to sinonasal function, delayed encephaloceles from the bony skull base defect and resulting endocrinopathies can significantly impact patient's QOL. Awareness of these complications and their current management is valuable for endoscopic surgeons. SUMMARY: Endonasal approaches to the skull base are safe and well tolerated in properly selected patients. This article highlights the delayed complications that require recognition and management by skull base surgeons to ensure the best possible care for patients.

Development of the Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The patients' perspective of health outcomes has become important input for assessing treatment effects. However, existing endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) instruments are not fully aligned with the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A prospective cohort study was therefore conducted to develop a suitable quality-of-life tool to assess nasal morbidity after EES: the Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q). METHODS: The study included 300 patients: 207 with sinus pathology and 93 with anterior skull base pathology. The EES-Q was administered prior to surgery and postoperatively (2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year). Psychometric instrument properties were tested and relevant health domains were formulated. Seventy-two items were generated by the conventional psychometric approach. An exploratory factor analysis was used to test construct validity. The optimal number of factors to retain was determined by using the eigenvalues-greater-than-1 rule and scree plot. Orthogonal varimax rotation was used to enhance interpretability. Internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach α. RESULTS: The factor analysis yielded a 3-factor solution, representing physical, psychological, and social functioning. The final version of the instrument consisted of 30 items with a high internal consistency (>0.80) for all 3 HRQoL domains. CONCLUSIONS: The EES-Q is a comprehensive, multidimensional, disease-specific instrument. A distinguishing characteristic is that, apart from the physical and psychological domains, the EES-Q also encompasses a social domain. Understanding different HRQoL aspects in patients undergoing EES may help caregivers restore, improve, or preserve the patient's health through individualized care, which depends on identifying their specific needs.

Survey of Anxiety in Ordinary Workers and Doctors Regarding Sedative Use during Endoscopic Examination in the Seoul Metropolitan Area.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sedative use is common in endoscopic examinations. The anxiety regarding sedative use may be different between doctors and nonmedical individuals. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted by a research company (DOOIT Survey), and responses were collected from 649 doctors and 1,738 individuals who perform typical jobs in nonmedical fields. In this study, these ordinary workers are considered to represent nonmedical individuals. Anxiety was measured using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The nonmedical individuals exhibited more anxiety regarding the sedative use than the doctors. Age <40 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.27; p<0.001), female sex (OR, 1.62; p=0.002), experience of an adverse event (OR, 1.79; p=0.049), and insufficient explanation (OR, 2.05; p<0.001) were the significant factors that increased the anxiety of the nonmedical individuals. The doctors who experienced a sedative-related adverse event reported increased anxiety compared with the doctors who did not report this experience (OR, 1.73; p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety regarding sedative use during an endoscopic examination was significantly different between doctors and non-medical individuals. A younger age, female sex, an adverse event, and insufficient explanation affect the anxiety of nonmedical individuals. An adverse event also affects the anxiety of doctors.

Seriously clowning: Medical clowning interaction with children undergoing invasive examinations in hospitals.

This qualitative study examined the subjective experience of children undergoing an invasive examination in the hospital when accompanied by a medical clown. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine such children and nine of their accompanying parents. The children were patients in two outpatient departments (Pediatric Gastroenterology and a Center for the Sexually Abused) in a hospital in Israel. Interviews were coded thematically using an Atlas.ti software program. Analysis of the interviews indicated that the intervention of the clown positively changed the children's perceptions of the hospital, of experiencing the examination, and of their life narrative. Medical clowns thus appear to be a central, meaningful, and therapeutic source for children undergoing invasive examinations in hospital, as well as for their parents. Therefore, it may be advisable to incorporate medical clowns as an integral part of medical teams performing invasive procedures and to include the clowns in all stages of the hospital visit.