Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.545
Filter
3.
BMJ ; 385: e074962, 2024 06 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830686

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/diagnosis , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology
4.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol ; 11(1)2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844375

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a standard treatment option for achalasia patients. Treatment response varies due to factors such as achalasia type, degree of dilatation, pressure and distensibility indices. We present an innovative approach for treatment response prediction based on an automatic three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction of the tubular oesophagus (TE) and the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) in patients undergoing POEM for achalasia. METHODS: A software was developed, integrating data from high-resolution manometry, timed barium oesophagogram and endoscopic images to automatically generate 3-D reconstructions of the TE and LES. Novel normative indices for TE (volume×pressure) and LES (volume/pressure) were automatically integrated, facilitating pre-POEM and post-POEM comparisons. Treatment response was evaluated by changes in volumetric and pressure indices for the TE and the LES before as well as 3 and 12 months after POEM. In addition, these values were compared with normal value indices of non-achalasia patients. RESULTS: 50 treatment-naive achalasia patients were enrolled prospectively. The mean TE index decreased significantly (p<0.0001) and the mean LES index increased significantly 3 months post-POEM (p<0.0001). In the 12-month follow-up, no further significant change of value indices between 3 and 12 months post-POEM was seen. 3 months post-POEM mean LES index approached the mean LES of the healthy control group (p=0.077). CONCLUSION: 3-D reconstruction provides an interactive, dynamic visualisation of the oesophagus, serving as a comprehensive tool for evaluating treatment response. It may contribute to refining our approach to achalasia treatment and optimising treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 22-0149.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Manometry , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Male , Female , Manometry/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/surgery , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Aged , Esophagus/surgery , Esophagoscopy/methods , Myotomy/methods , Software , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Young Adult
7.
Cir Cir ; 92(2): 276-282, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782380

ABSTRACT

The endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has evolved significantly in the past 20 years. Current practices include devices specifically designed for GERD. Newer techniques aim to use less extra equipment, to be less costly, and to use accessories readily available in endoscopy units, as well as using standard endoscopes to apply such techniques. It is of utmost importance to properly select the patients for endoscopic therapy, and it should be done in a multidisciplinary approach.


El tratamiento endoscópico de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) ha evolucionado significativamente en los últimos 20 años. Las prácticas actuales incluyen dispositivos diseñados específicamente para la ERGE. Las técnicas más nuevas tienen como objetivo utilizar menos equipos adicionales, ser menos costosos y utilizar accesorios fácilmente disponibles en las unidades de endoscopia, así como utilizar endoscopios estándar para aplicar dichas técnicas. Es de suma importancia seleccionar adecuadamente a los pacientes para la terapia endoscópica, y debe hacerse en un enfoque multidisciplinario.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Humans , Esophagoscopy/methods , Fundoplication/methods , Patient Selection , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods
8.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736137

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Barrett's oesophagus surveillance places significant burden on endoscopy services yet is vital to detect early cancerous change. Oesophageal cell collection device (OCCD) testing was introduced across Scotland for Barrett's surveillance in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This national pragmatic retrospective study presents the CytoSCOT programme results and evaluates whether OCCD testing is successfully identifying high-risk Barrett's patients requiring urgent endoscopy. METHODS: All patients undergoing OCCD testing for Barrett's surveillance across 11 Scottish health boards over a 32-month period were identified. Patients who underwent endoscopy within 12 months of OCCD test were included. Individual patient records were interrogated to record clinical information and OCCD test result to categorize patients into risk groups. Endoscopic histopathology results were analysed according to risk group and segment length. Patients were deemed high risk if the OCCD test demonstrated atypia and/or p53 positivity. RESULTS: 4204 OCCD tests were performed in 3745 patients: 608 patients underwent endoscopy within 12 months and were included in this analysis. Patients with longer Barrett's segments were significantly more likely to have an abnormal OCCD test. 50/608 patients (8.2%) had high-grade dysplasia or cancer on endoscopic biopsies: this equates to 1.3% of the total group (50/3745). 46/50 patients (92.0%) were deemed high risk, triggering urgent endoscopy: this rose to 100% with insufficient tests removed. There were no cancers diagnosed within 12 months post-OCCD in the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: OCCD testing is an effective triage tool to identify high-risk patients with Barrett's oesophagus requiring further investigation with endoscopy within the real-world setting.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagoscopy , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Scotland/epidemiology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Risk Assessment , Esophagus/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Adult
12.
Esophagus ; 21(3): 357-364, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607537

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Japan, the standard management of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma after endoscopic submucosal dissection involves follow-up; however, multifocal synchronous/metachronous lesions are sometimes observed after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Risk stratification of multifocal cancer facilitates appropriate treatment, including eradication of Barrett's esophagus in high-risk cases; however, no effective risk stratification methods have been established. Thus, we identified the risk factors for multifocal cancer and explored risk-stratified treatment strategies for residual Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 97 consecutive patients with superficial Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinomas who underwent curative resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Multifocal cancer was defined by the presence of synchronous/metachronous lesions during follow-up. We used Cox regression analysis to identify the risk factors for multifocal cancer and subsequently analyzed differences in cumulative incidences. RESULTS: The cumulative incidences of multifocal cancer at 1, 3, and 5 years were 4.4%, 8.6%, and 10.7%, respectively. Significant risk factors for multifocal cancer were increased circumferential and maximal lengths of Barrett's esophagus. The cumulative incidences of multifocal cancer at 3 years were lower for patients with circumferential length < 4 cm and maximal length < 5 cm (2.9% and 1.2%, respectively) than for patients with circumferential length ≥ 4 cm and maximal length ≥ 5 cm (51.5% and 49.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification of multifocal cancer using length of Barrett's esophagus was effective. Further multicenter prospective studies are needed to substantiate our findings.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Female , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Japan/epidemiology , Incidence , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/surgery , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/pathology , Aged, 80 and over
13.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 40(4): 299-304, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606810

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to discuss recent advancements in the endoscopic management of early esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1 EAC). RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with high-risk EAC (defined by the presence of deep submucosal invasion, and/or lymphovascular invasion, and/or poor differentiation) have a higher risk of lymph node metastases than those with low-risk EAC. However, more recent, endoscopically-focused studies report a lower risk of lymph node metastases and distant metastases for high-risk EAC than previously assumed. Instead of referring all high-risk EAC patients for esophagectomy after a radical endoscopic resection, an alternative approach involving regular upper endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound may allow for detection of intra-luminal recurrence and lymph node metastases at an early and potentially curable stage. SUMMARY: Endoscopic resection of mucosal and submucosal EAC might prove to be safe and curative for selected cases in the future, when followed by a strict follow-up protocol. Despite the promising results of preliminary studies, there is an ongoing need for personalized strategies and new risk stratification methods to decide on the best management for individual patients with high-risk T1 EAC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagoscopy , Precision Medicine , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Precision Medicine/methods , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophagectomy/methods , Endosonography , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control
14.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 40(4): 314-318, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661336

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To compare different therapeutic modalities and determine their role in the treatment of esophageal achalasia. RECENT FINDINGS: The last 3 decades have seen a significant improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal achalasia. Conventional manometry has been replaced by high-resolution manometry, which has determined a more precise classification of achalasia in three subtypes, with important treatment implications. Therapy, while still palliative, has evolved tremendously. While pneumatic dilatation was for a long time the main choice of treatment, this approach slowly changed at the beginning of the nineties when minimally invasive surgery was adopted, initially thoracoscopically and then laparoscopically with the addition of partial fundoplication. And in 2010, the first report of a new endoscopic technique - peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) - was published, revamping the interest in the endoscopic treatment of achalasia. SUMMARY: This review focuses particularly on the comparison of POEM and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication as primary treatment modality for esophageal achalasia. Based on the available data, we believe that LHM with partial fundoplication should be the primary treatment modality in most patients. POEM should be selected when surgical expertise is not available, for type III achalasia, for the treatment of recurrent symptoms, and for patients who had prior abdominal operations that would make LHM challenging and unsafe.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Fundoplication , Heller Myotomy , Laparoscopy , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Esophageal Achalasia/physiopathology , Humans , Heller Myotomy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Fundoplication/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Treatment Outcome , Myotomy/methods , Esophagoscopy/methods , Manometry/methods
16.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(13): 1810-1814, 2024 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38659479

ABSTRACT

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Wang et al published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology in 2023. We focused on identifying risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) patients and how to construct a simple and reliable clinical prediction model to assess the risk of LNM in SESCC patients, thereby helping to guide the selection of an appropriate treatment plan. The current standard treatment for SESCC is radical esophagectomy with lymph node dissection. However, esophagectomy is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic resection (ER) offers a safer and less invasive alternative to surgical resection and can enable the patient's quality of life to be maintained while providing a satisfactory outcome. However, since ER is a localized treatment that does not allow for lymph node dissection, the risk of LNM in SESCC limits the effectiveness of ER. Understanding LNM status can aid in determining whether patients with SESCC can be cured by ER without the need for additional esophagectomy. Previous studies have shown that tumor size, macroscopic type of tumor, degree of differentiation, depth of tumor invasion, and lymphovascular invasion are factors associated with LNM in patients with SESCC. In addition, tumor budding is commonly associated with LNM, recurrence, and distant metastasis, but this topic has been less covered in previous studies. By comprehensively evaluating the above risk factors for LNM, useful evidence can be obtained for doctors to select appropriate treatments for SESCC patients.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Esophagectomy , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Humans , Risk Factors , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/secondary , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophagectomy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Esophagoscopy/methods , Neoplasm Staging
19.
Int J Surg ; 110(4): 2055-2064, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38668658

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Current treatments for refractory benign esophageal strictures (BESs) often take several years and have poor effects. The authors propose a novel method of self-help inflatable balloon (SHIB) and evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted from January 2019 to March 2022. All enrolled patients were diagnosed with refractory BESs and received SHIB. The primary endpoint was the clinical success rate at 12 months after removing SHIB. The secondary endpoints were the number of days of placing SHIB, and changes from baseline in BMI and health-related quality of life at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The clinical success rate was 51.2% (21/41) with the median days of placing SHIB being 104.0 days (range: 62.0-134.5 days), which was higher in the endoscopic group compared to the caustic and surgery groups (63.3 vs. 28.6% vs. 0, P=0.025). All patients (100%) showed significant improvement in dysphagia scores during placing SHIB. Although 20 patients (48.8%) experienced recurrent stricture, the median stricture length was decreased (P<0.001) and the median intervention-free interval was prolonged (P<0.001). In all patients, the mean BMI at and health-related quality of life at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly increased compared with baseline (P<0.05). On multivariate analysis, stricture etiology and wearing time were independent predictors of recurrent stricture. CONCLUSIONS: The SHIB has high efficacy and safety in treating refractory BESs of different origins, especially for endoscopic resection. Stricture etiology and wearing time were independent predictors of recurrent stricture.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Stenosis , Quality of Life , Humans , Esophageal Stenosis/therapy , Esophageal Stenosis/surgery , Male , Prospective Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Aged , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophagoscopy/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...