Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 108
Filter
2.
[Montevideo]; Arquidiocesana; 2023. 147 p.
Monography in Spanish | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1566618
5.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1408637

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Aunque la vida es un valor moral que ha de ser respetado por encima de todo, la Eutanasia se continúa practicando hoy día en muchos países, y con ello persisten discrepancias en torno a su enfoque bioético. Objetivos: Describir algunos aspectos históricos, legales y conceptuales esenciales relacionados con la eutanasia, como posibles aristas a tomar en cuenta para su enfoque bioético. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de revisión descriptivo observacional con componente analítico, empleando una exhaustiva revisión bibliográfica, con el uso de los descriptores en Ciencias de la Salud: eutanasia AND ética donde se compararon las posiciones de diferentes países en torno a la eutanasia y se contrastaron conceptos como calidad de vida y su expresión en la edad pediátrica. Conclusiones: El estudio sistemático de todas las posibles aristas de la eutanasia es fundamental para lograr un adecuado enfoque bioético de la misma, lo cual contribuye a que podamos ser más consecuentes y humanistas en el momento de hacer cumplir una muerte digna(AU)


Introduction: Although life is a moral value that must be respected above anything else, euthanasia is still practiced today in many countries; with this, discrepancies persist regarding its bioethical approach. Objectives: To describe some essential historical, legal and conceptual aspects related to euthanasia, as possible aspects to take into account for its bioethical approach. Methods: An observational and descriptive review study with an analytical component was carried out, using an exhaustive bibliographic review, with the use of the following health sciences descriptors: eutanasia [euthanasia], ADN [DNA] ética [ethics]; thus, the positions of different countries regarding euthanasia were compared and some concepts were contrasted, such as quality of life and its expression in pediatric age. Conclusions: The systematic study of all the possible aspects of euthanasia is essential for achieving an adequate bioethical approach to it, which contributes to our being more consistent and humanistic when making a dignified death possible(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Bioethics , Euthanasia/ethics , Critical Illness , Medical Care , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Observational Study
6.
Archiv. med. fam. gen. (En línea) ; 18(2): 17-22, jun. 2021.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, InstitutionalDB, BINACIS, UNISALUD | ID: biblio-1292507

ABSTRACT

Cuando el final de la vida acaece con manifestaciones de dolencias extremas es una de las situaciones en las cuales se debe priorizar la autonomía del paciente y respetar, como en todo momento, su dignidad. Es allí donde se expresa la palabra eutanasia, la cual proviene etimológicamente del término griego que significa "buena muerte". Esta palabra cuya definición etimológica es relativamente simple nos pone frente a dilemas que oscilan entre lo ético, lo moral, lo legal y lo social. La muerte es el resultado de la práctica de la eutanasia. Y a esta debemos analizarla como una práctica optativa en la actualidad en determinadas circunstancias y bajo el respeto de principios bioéticos respaldados legalmente. En el presente artículo se procura plasmar desde los principios bioéticos argumentos a favor y en contra de la eutanasia (AU)


When the end of life occurs with manifestations of extreme ailments, it is one of the situations in which the autonomy of the patient must be prioritized and his dignity respected, as at all times. It is there where the word euthanasia is expressed, which comes etymologically from the Greek term that means "good death". This word whose etymological definition is relatively simple puts us in front of dilemmas that oscillate between the ethical, the moral, the legal and the social. Death is the result of the practice of euthanasia. And we must analyze this as an optional practice at present in certain circumstances and under the respect of legally supported bioethical principles. This article attempts to capture from bioethical principles arguments for and against euthanasia (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Euthanasia/ethics , Suicide, Assisted , Death
7.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BIMENA | ID: biblio-1399846

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la eutanasia y el suicidio asistido son temas muy controvertidos en los que además de las consideraciones morales, las consideraciones clínicas, legales, políticas, religiosas y éticas juegan un papel importante. Objetivo: determinar los aspectos bioéticos relacionados con la eutanasia, el suicidio asistido y su relación con la medicina legal. Metodología: se realizó una búsqueda en las bases de datos Ibecs, Pubmed, Medline y LILACS sobre "aspectos bioéticos de la eutanasia, el suicidio asistido y su relación con la medicina forense". Las palabras clave fueron: Muerte asistida, Suicidio asistido, Bioética, Eutanasia y Medicina legal. Se revisaron artículos relevantes al tema en inglés y español, procedentes de los países de España, Italia, Suiza, India, Alemania, Colombia, Chile, Brasil, Argentina, Venezuela, Uruguay, Perú, México, Estados Unidos de Norte América y Canadá. Resultados: se encontraron 111 artículos; 34 fueron incluidos en esta revisión, en IBECS se encontraron 29, 12 seleccionados y 17 descartados. PubMed se encontraron 45 artículos, 13 fueron seleccionados y 32 descartados. Medline se encontraron cinco artículos, uno fue seleccionado y cuatro descartados. LILACS se encontraron 32 artículos, ocho seleccionados y 24 descartados. Además, se incluyeron siete fuentes adicionales: cuatro libros y tres códigos hondureños. Conclusión: Los aspectos bioéticos relacionados con la eutanasia, el suicidio asistido no son temas ampliamente discutidos, sin embargo, en las legislaciones de Holanda, y Suiza es obligatorio la investigación y el análisis forense para la toma de decisiones en casos específicos, apegados a los aspectos bioéticos y legales que beneficien al paciente...(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Bioethics , Suicide, Assisted , Euthanasia/ethics , Forensic Medicine
8.
Cir Cir ; 88(4): 519-525, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32567604

ABSTRACT

The arguments for and against euthanasia present a complex picture that will need to be discussed and decided in Mexico. This article addresses some relevant aspects such as the legal determination of death, the field of bioethics intervention, terminology related to euthanasia, its classifications, international instruments promoting human rights, as well as reflections on the importance of palliative care and the patient's right to be in a terminal situation to act in accordance with their goals, expectations and beliefs, in the context of their family and social relationships.


Los argumentos a favor y en contra de la eutanasia exponen un panorama complejo, que será necesario discutir y decidir en México. En este artículo se abordan algunos aspectos relevantes, como la determinación legal de la muerte, el campo de intervención de la bioética, la terminología relacionada con la eutanasia, sus clasificaciones, los instrumentos internacionales promotores de los derechos humanos, y reflexiones sobre la importancia de los cuidados paliativos y el derecho que tiene el paciente en situación terminal para actuar conforme a sus objetivos, expectativas y creencias, en el contexto de sus relaciones familiares y sociales.


Subject(s)
Death , Euthanasia , Attitude to Death , Belgium , Bioethical Issues , Brain Death , Colombia , Critical Illness , Euthanasia/classification , Euthanasia/ethics , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights , Humans , Luxembourg , Mexico , Netherlands , Palliative Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Palliative Care/methods , Patient Rights , Terminology as Topic , United States
9.
Acta bioeth ; 26(1): 9-16, mayo 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1114593

ABSTRACT

Este artículo tiene por objetivo introducir la noción de "autorrespeto" en el marco de la discusión sobre la eutanasia. Para ello muestra brevemente, en primer lugar, dos rasgos que caracterizan gran parte de los debates morales contemporáneos sobre temas de ética aplicada, rasgos que permitirán explicar, con mayor claridad, la necesidad de ampliar las razones que permitan a las personas estar en condiciones de adelantar su muerte. En segundo término, se expone una de las primeras reflexiones de Platón acerca de la diferencia entre el mero hecho de estar vivos (to zen) y el vivir bien (to eu zen), y cuyos argumentos podemos trasladar en parte al debate sobre la eutanasia. Luego de discutir la idea de "persona", el artículo aborda finalmente la noción de "autorrespeto" como criterio para considerar la legitimidad moral de poner anticipadamente fin a nuestra vida.


This paper aims to introduce the notion of self-respect in the context of the discussion on euthanasia. First, I briefly show two features that characterize much of the contemporary moral debates on issues of applied ethics, features that will allow me to explain more clearly the discussion about euthanasia. Looking back at the history of Philosophy, in the second part, I will show how Plato offered one of the first reflections on the difference between the mere fact of being alive (to zen) and living well (to eu zen), and whose arguments we can use to discuss euthanasia. Third, I will examine what we understand by a person and how a particular comprehension of this notion will allow me to elaborate arguments in favour of euthanasia based on the idea of self-respect.


Este artigo tem por objetivo introduzir a noção de "auto-respeito" no contexto da discussão sobre eutanásia. Para isto, mostra brevemente, em primeiro lugar, dois aspectos que caracterizam grande parte dos debates morais contemporâneos sobre temas de ética aplicada, aspectos estes que permitirão explicar, com maior clareza, a necessidade de ampliar as razões que permitam às pessoas estarem em condições de adiantar sua morte. Em segundo lugar, expõe-se uma das primeiras reflexões de Platão acerca da diferença entre o mero fato de estar vivos (to zen) e o viver bem (to eu zen), e cujos argumentos podemos transferir em parte ao debate sobre a eutanásia. Depois de discutir a ideia de "pessoa", o artigo aborda finalmente a noção de "auto-respeito" como critério para considerar a legitimidade moral de por antecipadamente fim à nossa vida.


Subject(s)
Euthanasia/ethics , Suicide, Assisted/ethics , Personal Autonomy , Value of Life , Respect , Self Concept
10.
Monash Bioeth Rev ; 38(1): 49-67, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32335862

ABSTRACT

End-of-life decision-making in patients with dementia is a complex topic. Belgium and the Netherlands have been at the forefront of legislative advancement and progressive societal changes concerning the perspectives toward physician-assisted death (PAD). Careful consideration of clinical and social aspects is essential during the end-of-life decision-making process in patients with dementia. Geriatric assent provides the physician, the patient and his family the opportunity to end life with dignity. Unbearable suffering, decisional competence, and awareness of memory deficits are among the clinical considerations that physicians should incorporate during the end-of-life decision-making process. However, as other societies introduce legislature granting the right of PAD, new social determinants should be considered; Mexico City is an example. Current perspectives regarding advance euthanasia directives (AED) and PAD in patients with dementia are evolving. A new perspective that hinges on the role of the family and geriatric assent should help culturally heterogeneous societies in the transition of their public health care policies regarding end-of-life choices.


Subject(s)
Advance Directives/ethics , Decision Making/ethics , Dementia , Ethics, Medical , Euthanasia/ethics , Legislation, Medical , Suicide, Assisted/ethics , Advance Directives/legislation & jurisprudence , Aged , Belgium , Bioethics , Culture , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Family , Humans , Informed Consent , Mexico , Netherlands , Personhood , Physicians , Policy , Social Change , Sociological Factors , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Terminal Care/ethics , Terminal Care/legislation & jurisprudence
11.
Montevideo; FEMI; c2020. 94 p.
Monography in Spanish | UY-BNMED, BNUY, LILACS | ID: biblio-1343401
12.
Interface (Botucatu, Online) ; 22(66): 733-744, jul.-set. 2018.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-954306

ABSTRACT

Este estudo buscou compreender os sentidos atribuídos, pelos profissionais de saúde, à prática da sedação paliativa no processo de morrer, as relações desta prática com a eutanásia, bem como os valores considerados importantes e que subsidiam a equipe de cuidados paliativos na tomada de decisão. Trata-se de uma pesquisa exploratória e descritiva de abordagem qualitativa, baseada na hermenêutica dialética. Os resultados indicam que os sentidos atribuídos pelos profissionais entrevistados acompanham o desenvolvimento científico, os quais têm buscado esclarecer os fatos clínicos de cada processo de tomada de decisão e os valores implicados, seguindo a evolução da reflexão ética sobre a prática da sedação paliativa e eutanásia. No âmbito da reflexão ética, os princípios não são vistos como absolutos, pois, ao considerarem os valores, os profissionais analisam as circunstâncias e as consequências que permeiam as decisões.(AU)


The aim of the present study was to investigate the meaning attributed by healthcare professionals to the practice of palliative sedation in the dying process, the relationship of this practice with euthanasia, and the values considered important and that ground decision making by palliative care teams. This is an exploratory and descriptive qualitative study, based on dialectical hermeneutics. The results show that the meanings attributed by the interviewed professionals were in line with scientific development. They reported that they sought to clarify the clinical facts involved in each decision-making process and the implicated values according to the evolution of ethical reflections regarding the practice of palliative sedation and euthanasia. Within the scope of ethical reflection, principles are not considered absolute, because, when considering as values, professionals analyzed the specific circumstances and the consequences involving their decisions.(AU)


El objetivo de este estudio fue entender los sentidos atribuidos por los profesionales de salud a la práctica de la sedación paliativa en el proceso de muerte, las relaciones de esta práctica con la eutanasia, así como los valores considerados importante y que sirven de subsidio al equipo de cuidados paliativos en la toma de decisión. Se trata de una encuesta exploratoria y descriptiva de abordaje cualitativo, con base en la hermenéutica dialéctica. Los resultados indican que los sentidos atribuidos por los profesionales entrevistados acompañan el desarrollo científico, los cuales han buscado aclarar los hechos clínicos de cada proceso de toma de decisión y los valores implicados, siguiendo la evolución de la reflexión ética sobre la práctica de la sedación paliativa y la eutanasia. En el ámbito de la reflexión ética, los principios no son vistos como absolutos, puesto que, al considerar los valores, los profesionales analizan las circunstancias y las consecuencias presentes en las decisiones.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Bioethics , Euthanasia/ethics , Hospice Care/ethics
13.
Acta bioeth ; 23(1): 171-178, jun. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-886017

ABSTRACT

It has been debated whether the Hippocratic Oath's commitment referring to not administering poisonous/ deadly drugs prohibits: euthanasia, assisted suicide or murder. The first goal was to analyze if the prohibition of administering poisonous/deadly drugs was kept and how it changed in medical oaths of Hippocratic stemma of different time periods and religious orientations. The second aim was discern what is forbidden: euthanasia, assisted suicide or murder. Seventeen medical oaths: 4 Medieval, 2 Modern and 11 Contemporary oaths were studied and divided into those expressing the commitment like the original, those that may include it depending on the interpretation and those that do not mention it. Medieval and Modern oaths express it similarly to the Hippocratic Oath, possibly due to religious and Hippocratic/Galenic influences. What they forbid cannot be inferred. Contemporary oaths maintaining the commitment tend to include phrases regarding active euthanasia and assisted suicide. Other contemporary oaths may generalize it. It would be advisable that medical oaths would contain clear and specific premises regarding this commitment depending on the country, school and the student body's idiosyncrasies.


Ha sido debatido qué es lo que prohíbe el compromiso del Juramento Hipocrático de no administrar drogas venenosas/mortales: la eutanasia, el suicidio asistido o el asesinato. El primer objetivo fue analizar si la prohibición de administrar drogas venenosas/mortales se mantuvo y cómo cambió en juramentos médicos de stemma hipocrática en diferentes tiempos y con distinta orientación religiosa. El segundo objetivo fue discernir qué se prohíbe: si la eutanasia, el suicidio asistido o el asesinato. Se analizaron 17 juramentos médicos: 4 medievales, 2 modernos y 11 contemporáneos. Se dividieron en aquellos que expresan el compromiso como el original, aquellos que podrían incluirlo o no dependiendo de la interpretación y aquellos que no mencionan nada al respecto. Los juramentos medievales y modernos expresan el compromiso de manera similar al Juramento Hipocrático, posiblemente por influencias religiosas e hipocrático/galénicas. Qué es lo que prohíben no puede ser inferido. Los juramentos contemporáneos que mantienen el compromiso suelen incluir frases en relación a la eutanasia activa y al suicidio asistido. Otros juramentos contemporáneos lo generalizarían. Sería recomendable que los juramentos incorporaran compromisos claros dependiendo de la idiosincrasia de los países, instituciones y cuerpo estudiantil.


Tem sido debatido se o compromisso do juramento de Hipócrates, referindo-se a não administrção de drogas venenosas/mortais, proíbe: a eutanásia, o suicídio assistido ou o assassinato. O primeiro objetivo foi analisar se a proibição de administrar drogas venenosas/mortais foi mantida e como isso mudou em juramentos médicos de Hippocratic stemma em diferentes períodos de tempo e orientações religiosas. O segundo objetivo foi discernir o que é proibido: eutanásia, suicídio assistido ou assassinato. Dezessete juramentos médicos: 4 medievais, 2 modernos e 11 juramentos contemporâneos foram estudados e divididos naqueles que expressavam o compromisso semelhante ao original, aqueles que podem incluir, consoante a interpretação e aqueles que não o mencionam. Os juramentos medievais e modernos expressam da mesma forma que o juramento de Hipócrates, possivelmente devido a influência religiosa e de Hipócrates/galênica. O que eles proíbem não podem ser inferido. Os juramentos contemporâneos, mantendo o compromisso tendem a incluir frases sobre eutanásia ativa e suicídio assistido. Outros juramentos contemporâneos podem generalizá-lo. Seria aconselhável que os juramentos médicos conteria premissas claras e específicas sobre este compromisso dependendo do país, a escola e as idiossincrasias do corpo estudantil.


Subject(s)
Humans , Euthanasia/ethics , Suicide, Assisted/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Hippocratic Oath , Homicide/ethics
14.
Med. interna (Caracas) ; 33(1): 20-23, 2017.
Article in Spanish | LIVECS, LILACS | ID: biblio-1009251

ABSTRACT

La atención del enfermo terminal constituye un reto para el médico internista; a menudo se presentan síntomas como el dolor y otros que ocasionan sufrimiento al paciente. La medicina paliativa constituye una excelente opción para el aliviocon un sentido de compasión. En ocasiones se puede requerir la sedación paliativa. La difusión de la eutanasia (suprimir la vida del enfermo) y del suicidio asistido como solución al sufrimiento, que ha sido propuesta en diversos países y en algunos se practica, atenta contra la dignidad del enfermo, va en contra de la esencia de la medicina al convertir al médico en un "matador."El papel de los familiares es fundamental en la atención del paciente sufriente(AU)


This is a challenge for the specialist in internal medicine. The terminal patient has often symptoms like pain and others which cause suffering. Paliative medicine is an excellent option for alleviating these symptoms with a sense of compassion. Some times paliative sedation can be required. In some countries euthanasia and assisted suicide as a solution to suffering has been proposed and practiced this attempts against the dignity of the patient, goes against de essence of medicine by converting the physician in a "killer" . The rol of the family es fundamental in the care of these patients who suffer(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Terminal Care , Euthanasia/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Pain Measurement , Internal Medicine
15.
Salud Colect ; 11(3): 331-49, 2015 Sep.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26418091

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses from a sociological perspective one of Catholicism's fronts of public intervention in the development and enactment of health legislation. In particular we analyze the debate in parliamentary committees on the so-called "death with dignity" law (No. 26742), for which a group of bioethics experts was convened to counsel senators regarding the scope and limits of the law. The majority of the invited experts advocated a personalist bioethics perspective, which is a theological bioethics development of contemporary Catholicism. In the debate no representatives of other faiths were present, reinforcing the widely studied overlap between Catholicism and politics in Argentina.


Subject(s)
Bioethics , Catholicism , Religion and Medicine , Right to Die/ethics , Right to Die/legislation & jurisprudence , Theology , Argentina , Dissent and Disputes , Euthanasia/ethics , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Politics
18.
BMC Med Ethics ; 15: 85, 2014 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25511565

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical students(MS) will face ethical issues throughout their lives as doctors. The present study aims to investigate medical students' opinions on controversial ethical issues and factors associated with these opinions. METHODS: SBRAME (Spirituality and Brazilian Medical Education) is a multicenter study involving 12 Brazilian medical schools with 5950 MS. Participants completed a questionnaire that collected information on socio-demographic data, medical schools characteristics, religious beliefs and opinions on controversial ethical issues. Of all MS, 3630 participated in the survey (61.0%). RESULTS: The sample was 53.8% women and the mean age was 22.5 years. In general, most MS have no objections to prescription of birth control (90.8%), adult stem cell use (87.5%), embryonic stem cell use (82.0%) and abortion for genetic reasons (51.2%). Approximately half of students have no objections to human cloning (47.3%), 45.7% to withdrawal of artificial life support, 41.4% to euthanasia and 23.3% to abortion for failed contraception. Socio-demographic data such as age, gender and income had little influence on MS opinions. On the other hand, medical schools characteristics (number of medical students in the university, year of medical school foundation, location of the university and type of university) and religious aspects (religious affiliation, religious attendance, non-organizational religiousness and intrinsic religiousness) were highly correlated with their opinions. In general, MS with more supportive opinions on controversial ethical issues were less religious and from non-traditional (newer), urban, public and bigger universities. CONCLUSION: The current study reveals MS have different opinions regarding controversial ethical issues. Noteworthy, these opinions seem to be shaped more by university characteristics and religious beliefs than socio-demographic data.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Bioethical Issues , Religion , Schools, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Abortion, Induced/ethics , Adult , Brazil , Cloning, Organism/ethics , Contraceptive Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Euthanasia/ethics , Faculty, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Private Sector , Public Sector , Rural Population , Schools, Medical/economics , Stem Cell Research/ethics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urban Population , Withholding Treatment/ethics , Workforce
19.
Acta bioeth ; 20(1): 9-21, jun. 2014.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-713507

ABSTRACT

El trasplante de órganos sólidos constituye el tratamiento de un gran número de enfermedades en fase terminal, mejora globalmente la supervivencia y la calidad de vida de los pacientes sometidos a este tipo de intervención y es considerado como un beneficioso progreso de la medicina para el conjunto de la sociedad. En las últimas décadas, y debido al estancamiento en la cantidad de donaciones y al aumento progresivo de las listas de espera, se han desarrollado diferentes acciones con el objetivo de ampliar el número potencial de donantes, reconsiderando nuevamente aquellos procedentes de parada cardiocirculatoria (donantes en asistolia). El objetivo de este trabajo consiste en reflexionar sobre la legitimidad de compaginar en un mismo proceso dos complejas decisiones éticas: la retirada de las técnicas de soporte vital (RTSV) y limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico (LET), y la posibilidad de considerar a estos pacientes como donantes de órganos. Con este propósito, analizaremos los problemas éticos que se plantean a cada paso en la toma de decisión y en las actuaciones en los programas en asistolia controlada, según el criterio de donantes tipo III adoptado en la conferencia de Maastricht de 1995, como fundamento para establecer un juicio ético de todo el proceso.


Solid organs trasplant constitutes a treatment for many diseases in terminal phase. Patients subjected to this type of intervention enhance survival and quality of life in general and it is considered a beneficial progress in medicine for society. In the last decades and due to the stagnation of donations and the progressive increase of waiting lists, some actions have been developed with the goal to widen the potential number of donors, reconsidering again those coming from cardiovascular arrest (asystole donors). The aim of this article consists in reflecting on the legitimacy of combining in the same process two complex ethical decisions: the withdrawal of life support techniques (WLST) and the limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE), and the possibility of considering these patients as organ donors. With this purpose, we will analyze the ethical problems involved in each step in decision making and on the actions taken by controlled asystole programs, according to the criteria of type III donors of Masstricht conference, 1995, as base to establish an ethical judgment for the process.


O transplante de órgãos sólidos constitui o tratamento de um grande número de enfermidades em fase terminal, melhora globalmente a sobrevivência e a qualidade de vida dos pacientes submetidos a este tipo de intervenção e é considerado como um beneficente progresso da medicina para o conjunto da sociedade. Nas últimas décadas, e devido ao estancamento na quantidade de doações e ao aumento progressivo das listas de espera, desenvolveram-se diferentes ações com o objetivo de ampliar o número potencial de doadores, reconsiderando novamente aqueles procedentes de parada cardiocirculatória (doadores em assistolia). O objetivo deste trabalho consiste em refletir sobre a legitimidade de compaginar num mesmo processo duas complexas decisões éticas: a retirada das técnicas de suporte vital (RTSV) e limitação do esforço terapêutico (LET), e a possibilidade de considerar estes pacientes como doadores de órgãos. Com este propósito, analisaremos os problemas éticos que se apresentam a cada passo na tomada de decisão e nas atuações nos programas em assistolia controlada, segundo o critério de doadores tipo III adotado na conferência de Maastricht de 1995, como fundamento para estabelecer um juízo ético de todo o processo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Life Support Care/ethics , Euthanasia/ethics , Heart Arrest , Organ Transplantation , Bioethics , Decision Making , Tissue Donors/ethics , Medical Futility , Personal Autonomy
20.
Rev Chil Pediatr ; 85(5): 608-12, 2014 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25697439

ABSTRACT

The recent enactment of a law that allows infant euthanasia in Belgium raises questions with varied answers. To contribute to a better understanding of the topic, euthanasia and legislation concepts are described. After a bioethical analysis, we propose as conclusion that children euthanasia could only be acceptable in very exceptional situations in which palliative measures have failed. The answer should be that it is not acceptable in our setting, not until we have public policies, protocols and palliative care services for terminally ill children.


Subject(s)
Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy , Terminally Ill/legislation & jurisprudence , Belgium , Bioethical Issues , Euthanasia/ethics , Humans , Infant , Palliative Care/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL