Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 75(8): 1656-1667, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28242238

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to present nationally representative estimates of hospitalizations primarily attributed to facial cellulitis and to conduct an exploratory analysis on identifying factors associated with outcomes, such as hospital charges, length of stay (LOS), disposition status, and occurrence of infectious complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study is a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 2012 and 2013. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code of "682.0" in the primary diagnosis field of NIS (reason for hospitalization) was used to identify cases with facial cellulitis. All patients at least 18 years old who were hospitalized for facial cellulitis were included. Outcome variables examined in the present study were hospital charges, LOS, disposition status, and occurrence of infectious complications. Descriptive statistics and a multivariable linear regression model were used to examine association between independent variables and patient disposition and infectious complications. RESULTS: In 2012 and 2013, 74,480 hospitalizations involved facial cellulitis in adults at least 18 years old in the United States. Most were women (mean age, 47.5 yr). Most patients were routinely discharged home. Age was associated with an increase in odds of discharge to another facility. Variables associated with decreased odds of bacterial infections were age and black or Hispanic race. Women with at least 1 comorbidity had higher odds of mycoses. Statistically relevant predictors of longer than average LOS were age, race, insurance, presence of sepsis, and location. CONCLUSIONS: This study presented nationally representative estimates of hospitalizations attributed primarily to facial cellulitis in the adult population in the United States in 2012 and 2013. The presence of a comorbid condition predicted worse outcomes. Public health efforts should focus on targeting high-risk patients and providing monitoring or early treatment of face cellulitis.


Subject(s)
Cellulitis/economics , Cellulitis/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Facial Dermatoses/economics , Facial Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hospitalization/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , United States
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 170(5): 1143-50, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24506666

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A gel containing diclofenac and hyaluronic acid (DHA) and photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL-PDT) are widely used treatments for actinic keratoses (AKs). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this single-centre, open-label, prospective, nonsponsored, randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the treatment results and cost-effectiveness of MAL-PDT and DHA. METHODS: Patients with multiple AKs of the face and scalp were randomized to receive MAL-PDT or DHA. After 90 days, the overall complete remission (CR) rate of patients and the CR rate of lesions according to thickness score were assessed, and patients and an investigator scored the cosmetic outcome. In addition, patients scored their overall satisfaction with the treatment. Patients with CR of all lesions were followed up for 12 months. RESULTS: Two hundred patients with a total of 1674 AKs were enrolled. The lesion CR rates at 3 months were 85·9% with MAL-PDT and 51·8% with DHA (P < 0·0001). AKs of all thicknesses were significantly more responsive to MAL-PDT. The patient CR rates at 3 months were 68% with MAL-PDT and 27% with DHA. At the 12-month examination, the number of patients with CR reduced to 37 with MAL-PDT and seven with DHA. Rating of cosmetic outcome was very good or excellent in the vast majority of patients with both treatments. The analysis of cost-effectiveness showed that the costs per patient with CR at 3 months and at 12 months are €566·7 and €1026·2, respectively, with MAL-PDT and €595·2 and €2295·6, respectively, with DHA. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy, cosmetic outcome and patients' overall satisfaction with MAL-PDT are superior in comparison with DHA. MAL-PDT is more expensive but it is more cost-effective.


Subject(s)
Facial Dermatoses/drug therapy , Keratosis, Actinic/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy/methods , Scalp Dermatoses/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aminolevulinic Acid/administration & dosage , Aminolevulinic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Aminolevulinic Acid/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/economics , Drug Combinations , Facial Dermatoses/economics , Female , Gels , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/economics , Keratosis, Actinic/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Photochemotherapy/economics , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Photosensitizing Agents/economics , Prospective Studies , Scalp Dermatoses/economics , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...