The Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence.

Fecal incontinence is the involuntary passage or the incapacity to control the release of fecal matter through the anus. It is a condition that significantly impairs quality of life in those that suffer from it, given that it affects body image, self-esteem, and interferes with everyday activities, in turn, favoring social isolation. There are no guidelines or consensus in Mexico on the topic, and so the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología brought together a multidisciplinary group (gastroenterologists, neurogastroenterologists, and surgeons) to carry out the «Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence¼ and establish useful recommendations for the medical community. The present document presents the formulated recommendations in 35 statements. Fecal incontinence is known to be a frequent entity whose incidence increases as individuals age, but one that is under-recognized. The pathophysiology of incontinence is complex and multifactorial, and in most cases, there is more than one associated risk factor. Even though there is no diagnostic gold standard, the combination of tests that evaluate structure (endoanal ultrasound) and function (anorectal manometry) should be recommended in all cases. Treatment should also be multidisciplinary and general measures and drugs (lidamidine, loperamide) are recommended, as well as non-pharmacologic interventions, such as biofeedback therapy, in selected cases. Likewise, surgical treatment should be offered to selected patients and performed by experts.

Sampling reflex as a new manometric marker in the diagnosis of defecation disorders: systematic review

Introduction: Distension of the rectum wall and subsequent momentary relaxation of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) trigger a reflex called the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR). This same rectal distension causes a reflex contraction of the external anal sphincter (EAS), responsible for conscious continence called rectoanal excitatory reflex (RAER). This set of reflexes are named sampling reflex. Objectives: The sampling reflex is necessary to initiate defecation or flatulence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the sampling reflex and its practical applicability as a manometric marker of the main defecation disorders. Methodology: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) items. The development method consisted of searching for articles in the research platforms BVS, PubMed, Cochrane Library, SciELO and ScienceDirect and for the selection of articles the Rayyan Platform was used. The articles resulting from the search strategies were added to the platform and five collaborators were invited for the blind selection. Finally, 6 articles were included in the final review. Results: An intact sampling reflex allows the individual to facilitate discrimination between flatus and stool and to choose whether to discharge or retain rectal contents. On the other hand, an impaired sampling reflex can predispose an individual to incontinence. Therefore, it was observed that patients with defecation disorders had an impaired sampling reflex, since it was found that constipated patients have incomplete opening of the IAS, lower amplitude of RAIR and increase of RAER. Most incontinent patients present a failure in the recruitment of the EAS, a decrease in the RAER and an increase in the RAIR, in duration and amplitude. (AU)

Anorectal Function and Clinical Characteristics Associated with Faecal Incontinence in Patients with Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Faecal incontinence is an important complaint reported by patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and it is associated with several disease-related mechanisms, including anorectal functional disorders. This study aimed to assess the anorectal function and clinical characteristics to identify parameters associated with faecal incontinence in CD patients. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of 104 patients with CD, aged 18 years or older, from a referral centre between August 2019 and May 2021. Patients responded to a specific questionnaire, and underwent medical record review, proctological examination and anorectal functional assessment with anorectal manometry. RESULTS: Of the 104 patients, 49% were incontinent. Patients with incontinence had a lower mean resting pressure [43.5 vs 53.1 mmHg; p = 0.038], lower mean squeeze pressure [62.1 vs 94.1 mmHg; p = 0.036] and lower maximum rectal capacity [140 vs 180 mL; p < 0.001]. Faecal incontinence was also associated with disease activity [p < 0.001], loose stools [p = 0.02], perianal disease [p = 0.006], previous anoperineal surgery [p = 0.048] and number of anorectal surgeries [p = 0.036]. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported study describing manometric findings of Crohn's disease patients with and without faecal incontinence. Our results identified an association between faecal incontinence and functional disorders, in addition to clinical features in these patients. Functional assessment with anorectal manometry may help choose the best treatment for faecal incontinence in patients with CD.

Development of a Bowel Management Scoring Tool in Pediatric Patients with Constipation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable and valid scoring tool, the Pediatric Bowel Management Scoring Tool (PBMST), to better guide management of constipation in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: The project comprised 2 stages, development of the questionnaire and construction of the bowel management score. Two questionnaires were created, one for children aged 8-18 years to self-report and one parent proxy-report for children aged 4-8 years. Questions regarding physical symptoms (n = 6), emotional aspects (n = 2), social activities/school (n = 1), and treatment (n = 1) were included. Patients (or parents of patients) with symptoms of constipation completed the questionnaire. The reproducibility of each question was computed using the Cohen weighted kappa coefficient (κ). A bowel management score was developed using logistic regression analysis, assessing the associations between the questions and impact on self-reported quality of life (QoL). Questions with adequate reproducibility and significantly associated with QoL were incorporated into the score. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 385 patients. Six questions met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the score: stool shape (range, 0-3 points), anorectal pain (0-4 points), abdominal pain (0-3 points), frequency of fecal incontinence (0-3 points), assistance of caregivers (0-3 points), and interference with social activities (0-6 points). Differences in bowel management scores among patients reporting no, little, some, or major impact on QoL were statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed and validated PBMST is a reliable tool for evaluating bowel management strategies in children with constipation.

Características clínicas de Soiling en pacientes postoperados de enfermedades anales en el Hospital General San Juan de Dios / Clinical settings of patients with postoperative Soiling at San Juan de Dios Hospital

Introducción: El soiling es el escape inconsciente de pequeñas cantidades de materia fecal después de una evacuación normal. Se ha reportado una prevalencia del 7-23% en otros países y se ha observado una alta incidencia después de esfinterotomías y fistulotomías (35-45%). Material y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional que incluyó 80 pacientes con patologías anales que acudieron a la consulta externa del Hospital General San Juan de Dios donde se aplicó un cuestionario de 8 ítems. Resultados: Se evaluaron 80 pacientes, la mayoría son hombres, de la quinta década. La enfermedad anal más frecuente son las hemorroides y el tratamiento quirúrgico más frecuente la hemorroidectomía. La incidencia de soiling definitivo (presencia de manchado a los 6 meses) es del 22.5%. Las variables asociadas fueron el género masculino, el tipo de enfermedad y procedimiento quirúrgico, el enrojecimiento, la picazón anal, el uso de protector en la región anal, la sensación de materia fecal y la limpieza en región anal. El ser hombre presenta un riesgo 6 veces mayor y el presentar enrojecimiento en la región anal aumenta el riesgo de 27 veces de presentar soiling definitivo. Conclusión: El soiling se presenta en un quinto de los pacientes que son operados de patologías anales en el Hospital General San Juan de Dios. La presencia de eritema, picazón anal, el uso de protector en la región anal, la sensación de materia fecal y la limpieza en región anal son variables estadísticamente asociadas al mismo. (AU)

Introduction: Soiling is the unconscious escape of small amounts of fecal matter after a normal bowel movement. A prevalence of 7-23% was reported in other countries and a high incidence was observed after sphincterotomies and fistulotomies (35-45%). Material and Methods: A observational study that included 80 patients with anal pathologies who attended the outpatient clinic of the San Juan de Dios General Hospital during 2018-2019, where an 8-item questionnaire was applied. Results: Eighty patients were evaluated, the majority are men, in their fifth decade. The most common anal disease is hemorrhoids, and the most common surgical treatment is hemorrhoidectomy. The incidence of definitive soiling (presence of spotting at 6 months) is 22.5%. The variables associated with definitive soiling were male gender, type of disease and surgical procedure, redness, anal itching, use of a protector in the anal region, the sensation of fecal matter, and cleanliness in the anal region. Being male presents a 6 times greater risk of definitive soiling and having redness in the anal region presents a 27 times greater risk of definitive soiling. Conclusion: Soiling occurs in a fifth of the patients operated for anal pathologies at the San Juan de Dios General Hospital. The presence of erythema, anal itching, the use of a protector in the anal region, the sensation of stool, and cleanliness in the anal region are statistically associated variables with soiling. (AU)

Comparison of Anorectal Manometry Testing in Left Lateral and Lithotomy Positions.

OBJECTIVES: Anorectal manometry (ARM) is typically performed in left lateral position, but many practitioners are more familiar with the lithotomy position. We aimed to evaluate agreement between ARM performed in left lateral and lithotomy positions and patient preference for testing position. METHODS: We performed a prospective comparison study of left lateral versus lithotomy position for women undergoing ARM for the evaluation of fecal incontinence. Women were randomly assigned to undergo testing in either left lateral position first followed by lithotomy position, or vice versa. Women then completed a survey assessing preference of position. We performed Bland-Altman analysis to measure the level of agreement between anorectal measurements obtained in the 2 positions. RESULTS: Twenty-one women were enrolled (mean age, 65 ± 2.2 years). We noted an acceptable level of agreement between anal pressure values obtained in left lateral versus lithotomy positions: anal resting pressure (mean difference, 0.9 mm Hg; 95% limits of agreement, 30.2 and -28.5) and anal squeeze pressure (mean difference, 1.8 mm Hg; 95% limits of agreement, 54.3 and -50.7). The level of agreement for sensory values was outside the predetermined clinical acceptability range. Most women (17/21 [81%]) reported a "good" or "very good" experience in both positions. CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal manometry testing in the 2 positions can be used interchangeably for anal resting and squeeze pressures, but not for anorectal sensation. This modification can be introduced into clinical practice to accommodate the preference of women and practitioners who favor lithotomy position.

Gastrointestinal motility and absorptive disorders in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: Prevalence, diagnosis and treatment.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), Crohn`s disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic conditions associated with high morbidity and healthcare costs. The natural history of IBD is variable and marked by alternating periods of flare and remission. Even though the use of newer therapeutic targets has been associated with higher rates of mucosal healing, a great proportion of IBD patients remain symptomatic despite effective control of inflammation. These symptoms may include but not limited to abdominal pain, dyspepsia, diarrhea, urgency, fecal incontinence, constipation or bloating. In this setting, commonly there is an overlap with gastrointestinal (GI) motility and absorptive disorders. Early recognition of these conditions greatly improves patient care and may decrease the risk of mistreatment. Therefore, in this review we describe the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of GI motility and absorptive disorders that commonly affect patients with IBD.

Anorectal manometry in children with retentive fecal incontinence: What parameters should we evaluate? / Manometría anorrectal en niños con incontinencia fecal retentiva: ¿Qué parámetros debemos evaluar?

INTRODUCTION: Children with functional constipation frequently present with alterations in rectal compliance and the urge-to-defecate sensation that can be evaluated through anorectal manometry (ARM). In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of the parameters obtained through ARM in children with retentive fecal incontinence (RFI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children with functional constipation, aged 4 to 17years, that underwent ARM were included in the study. RESULTS: Of the 35 children evaluated, 21 presented with functional constipation and 14 had functional constipation and RFI. The children with both constipation and RFI tolerated greater volumes of air insufflation for triggering the urge to defecate and reaching maximum tolerance of pain, compared with the children that did not have RFI. We identified the cutoff point of 135ml of air as the maximum tolerance sensation for distinguishing children with RFI. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum tolerance of pain was the most useful parameter for evaluating RFI in children with functional constipation.

IS THE PHYSICIAN EXPERTISE IN DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION OF VALUE IN DETECTING ANAL TONE IN COMPARISON TO ANORECTAL MANOMETRY?

BACKGROUND: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is part of the physical examination, is also essential for the colorectal surgeon evaluation. A good DRE offers precious information related to the patient's complaints, which will help in decision making. It is simple, quick and minimally invasive. In many centers around the world, the DRE is still the only method to evaluate the anal sphincter prior to patient's management. On the other hand, anorectal manometry (ARM) is the main method for objective functional evaluation of anal sphincter pressures. The discrepancy of DRE depending on the examiner to determine sphincter tonus in comparison to ARM motivated this study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the DRE performed by proficient and non-experienced examiners to sphincter pressure parameters obtained at ARM, depending on examiners expertise. METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients with complaints of fecal incontinence or chronic constipation, from the anorectal physiology clinic of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine, were prospectively included. Each patient underwent ARM and DRE performed by two senior colorectal surgeons and one junior colorectal surgeon prior to the ARM. Patient's history was blinded for the examiner's knowledge, also the impressions of each examiner were blinded from the others. For the DRE rest and squeeze pressures were classified by an objective scale (DRE scoring system) that was compared to the parameters of the ARM for the analysis. The results obtained at the ARM were compared to the DRE performed by the seniors and the junior colorectal surgeons. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis was performed for all parameters. For the rest and squeeze pressures the Gamma index was used for the comparison between the DRE and ARM, which varied from 0 to 1. The closer to 1 the better was the agreement. RESULTS: The mean age was 48 years old and 55.5% of patients were female. The agreement of rest anal pressures between the ARM and the DRE performed by the senior proficient examiners was 0.7 (CI 95%; 0.32-1.0), while for the junior non-experienced examiner was 0.52 (CI 95%; 0.09-0.96). The agreement of squeeze pressures was 0.96 (CI 95%; 0.87-1.0) for the seniors and 0.52 (CI 95%; 0.16-0.89) for the junior examiner. CONCLUSION: More experienced colorectal surgeons used to DRE had a more significant agreement with the ARM, thereafter would have more appropriate therapeutic management to patients with sphincter functional problems. ARM, therefore, persists as an important exam to objectively evaluate the sphincter complex, justifying its utility in the clinical practice.

A experiência do médico examinador tem influência na avaliação do tônus anal em comparação à manometria anorretal? / Is the physician expertise in digital rectal examination of value in detecting anal tone in comparison to anorectal manometry?

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is part of the physical examination, is also essential for the colorectal surgeon evaluation. A good DRE offers precious information related to the patient's complaints, which will help in decision making. It is simple, quick and minimally invasive. In many centers around the world, the DRE is still the only method to evaluate the anal sphincter prior to patient's management. On the other hand, anorectal manometry (ARM) is the main method for objective functional evaluation of anal sphincter pressures. The discrepancy of DRE depending on the examiner to determine sphincter tonus in comparison to ARM motivated this study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the DRE performed by proficient and non-experienced examiners to sphincter pressure parameters obtained at ARM, depending on examiners expertise. METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients with complaints of fecal incontinence or chronic constipation, from the anorectal physiology clinic of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine, were prospectively included. Each patient underwent ARM and DRE performed by two senior colorectal surgeons and one junior colorectal surgeon prior to the ARM. Patient's history was blinded for the examiner's knowledge, also the impressions of each examiner were blinded from the others. For the DRE rest and squeeze pressures were classified by an objective scale (DRE scoring system) that was compared to the parameters of the ARM for the analysis. The results obtained at the ARM were compared to the DRE performed by the seniors and the junior colorectal surgeons. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis was performed for all parameters. For the rest and squeeze pressures the Gamma index was used for the comparison between the DRE and ARM, which varied from 0 to 1. The closer to 1 the better was the agreement. RESULTS: The mean age was 48 years old and 55.5% of patients were female. The agreement of rest anal pressures between the ARM and the DRE performed by the senior proficient examiners was 0.7 (CI 95%; 0.32-1.0), while for the junior non-experienced examiner was 0.52 (CI 95%; 0.09-0.96). The agreement of squeeze pressures was 0.96 (CI 95%; 0.87-1.0) for the seniors and 0.52 (CI 95%; 0.16-0.89) for the junior examiner. CONCLUSION: More experienced colorectal surgeons used to DRE had a more significant agreement with the ARM, thereafter would have more appropriate therapeutic management to patients with sphincter functional problems. ARM, therefore, persists as an important exam to objectively evaluate the sphincter complex, justifying its utility in the clinical practice.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: Exame anorretal digital (EAD) faz parte do exame físico, também é essencial para a avaliação do cirurgião colorretal. Um bom EAD oferece informações preciosas relacionadas às queixas do paciente, que auxiliam na tomada de decisões. Sua realização é simples, rápida e minimamente invasiva. Em diversos centros ao redor do mundo, o toque retal ainda é o único método para avaliar o esfíncter anal antes do tratamento. Por outro lado, a manometria anorretal (MAR) é o principal método para avaliação funcional objetiva das pressões esfincterianas. A discrepância entre o EAD, dependendo do examinador para determinar o tônus esfincteriano em comparação à MAR motivou este estudo. OBJETIVO: Comparar o EAD com os parâmetros de pressão esfincteriana obtidos na MAR, dependendo da experiência dos examinadores. MÉTODOS: Trinta e seis pacientes consecutivos com queixas de incontinência fecal ou constipação crônica, do ambulatório de Fisiologia Anorretal da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, foram prospectivamente incluídos. Cada paciente foi submetido a MAR e EAD realizados por dois cirurgiões colorretais seniores e um júnior antes da MAR. A história dos pacientes propositalmente omitida dos examinadores, e os resultados de cada examinador foram cegos dos demais. Para o EAD, as pressões de repouso e contração foram classificadas por uma escala objetiva (EAD Scoring System), realizada pelos examinadores seniores e pelo júnior em todos os pacientes, que foi comparada com os parâmetros da MAR para a análise. ANÁLISE ESTATÍSTICA: A análise descritiva foi feita para todos os parâmetros. Para as pressões de repouso e contração, o índice Gamma foi utilizado para a comparação entre o EAD e a MAR, que variou de 0 a 1. Quanto mais próximo de 1 melhor a concordância entre os dois métodos de avaliação. RESULTADOS: A idade média foi de 48 anos e 55,5% dos pacientes eram do sexo feminino. A concordância das pressões anais de repouso entre a MAR e o EAD realizadas pelos examinadores seniores, proficientes, foi de 0,7 (IC 95%; 0,32-1,0), enquanto para o examinador júnior, menos experiente, foi de 0,52 (IC95%; 0,09-0,96). A concordância das pressões de contração foi de 0,96 (IC 95%; 0,87-1,0) para os examinadores seniores e de 0,52 (IC 95%; 0,16-0,89) para o júnior. CONCLUSÃO: Cirurgiões colorretais mais experientes, o EAD teve concordância mais significativa com a MAR, o que poderia levar a um manejo terapêutico mais adequado aos pacientes portadores de doença anorretais funcionais. A manometria anorretal permanece, portanto, como método de avaliação objetiva da função esfincteriana.

[Frequency of fecal incontinence and its impact on the quality of life of the hospitalized geriatric patient]. / Frecuencia de incontinencia fecal y su impacto en la calidad de vida del paciente geriátrico hospitalizado.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of fecal incontinence and the impact on the quality of life of hospitalized geriatric patients in a sample from a level two hospital in Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospitalized patients over 60 years of age or their caregivers were questioned about the presence of fecal incontinence. Those who responded affirmatively and could respond were given the following questionnaires and scales: Mini-Mental, Rockwood quality of life for fecal incontinence and Wexner scale modified for severity of incontinence; in addition to clinical data. The frequency was calculated based on a sample and associations were determined between degree of incontinence and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were questioned, of whom 135 (57.69%) were women and 99 (42.31%) men. A total of 34 patients with fecal incontinence were documented, this represents a frequency of 14.53% (95% CI, 10.28-19.71%) in this population. A positive correlation of the severity of incontinence was found with the lifestyle dimension (relation (r) = -0.61, p = 0.04), shame (r = -0.70, p = 0.01), behavior (r = -0.73, p = 0.001) and the average of the four dimensions (r = -0.67, p = 0.02) but not with the depression dimension of the quality of life questionnaire in fecal incontinence. CONCLUSION: When compared with other national and international studies, the frequency of fecal incontinence found was lower than that documented in other series. The quality of life of hospitalized elderly patients with fecal incontinence in this sample was diminished and its impact on quality of life correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence.

Frecuencia de incontinencia fecal y su impacto en la calidad de vida del paciente geriátrico hospitalizado / Frequency of fecal incontinence and its impact on the quality of life of the hospitalized geriatric patient

Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de incontinencia fecal y el impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes geriátricos hospitalizados en una muestra de un hospital de segundo nivel de Monterrey, Nuevo León, México. Material y métodos: Se interrogó a los pacientes mayores de 60 años hospitalizados o sus cuidadores acerca de incontinencia fecal. A los que respondieran afirmativamente y pudieran responder se les realizaron los siguientes cuestionarios y escalas: Minimental, calidad de vida de Rockwood para incontinencia fecal y escala de Wexner modificada para severidad de incontinencia; además de datos clínicos. Se calculó la frecuencia en base a una muestra y se determinaron asociaciones entre grado de incontinencia y calidad de vida. Resultados: Se interrogaron un total de 234 pacientes, de los cuales 135 (57,69%) eran mujeres y 99 (42,31%) hombres. Se documentó un total de 34 pacientes con incontinencia fecal, esto representa una frecuencia de 14,53% (IC95%, 10,2819,71%) en esta población. Se encontró una correlación positiva de la severidad de la incontinencia con la dimensión de estilo de vida (relación (r) = -0,61, p=0,04), vergüenza (r=-0,70, p=0,01), conducta (r=-0,73, p=0,001) y el promedio de las cuatro dimensiones (r=-0,67, p=0,02) pero no con la dimensión de depresión del cuestionario de calidad de vida en incontinencia fecal. Conclusión: Al comparar con otros estudios nacionales e internacionales, la frecuencia de incontinencia fecal encontrada es menor a lo documentado en otras series. La calidad de vida de los pacientes ancianos hospitalizados con incontinencia fecal en esta muestra se encuentra disminuida y su impacto en la calidad de vida se correlaciona con la severidad de la incontinencia fecal.

Objective: To determine the frequency of fecal incontinence and the impact on the quality of life of hospitalized geriatric patients in a sample from a level two hospital in Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Materials and methods: Hospitalized patients over 60 years of age or their caregivers were questioned about the presence of fecal incontinence. Those who responded affirmatively and could respond were given the following questionnaires and scales: Mini-Mental, Rockwood quality of life for fecal incontinence and Wexner scale modified for severity of incontinence; in addition to clinical data. The frequency was calculated based on a sample and associations were determined between degree of incontinence and quality of life. Results: A total of 234 patients were questioned, of whom 135 (57.69%) were women and 99 (42.31%) men. A total of 34 patients with fecal incontinence were documented, this represents a frequency of 14.53% (95% CI, 10.28-19.71%) in this population. A positive correlation of the severity of incontinence was found with the lifestyle dimension (relation (r) = -0.61, p = 0.04), shame (r = -0.70, p = 0.01), behavior (r = -0.73, p = 0.001) and the average of the four dimensions (r = -0.67, p = 0.02) but not with the depression dimension of the quality of life questionnaire in fecal incontinence. Conclusion: When compared with other national and international studies, the frequency of fecal incontinence found was lower than that documented in other series. The quality of life of hospitalized elderly patients with fecal incontinence in this sample was diminished and its impact on quality of life correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence.

Is digital rectal exam reliable in grading anal sphincter defects? / O toque retal é confiável em graduar defeito dos esfíncteres anais?

ABSTRACT Background Anal sphincter tone is routinely assessed by digital rectal examination in patients with fecal incontinence, although its accuracy in detecting sphincter defects or separating competent from incompetent muscles has not been established. Objective In this setting, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of digital rectal examination in grading anal defects in order to separate small from extensive cases as depicted on 3D endoanal ultrasound, using a scoring sphincter defect and correlate anal tone to anal pressures. Methods Women with fecal incontinence were divided into two groups: small or extensive defects according to the ultrasound scoring system. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of digital rectal examination in grading global and external sphincter defects were calculated. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was compared to resting and incremental pressures. Results A cohort of 76 consecutive incontinent women were enrolled. The median Wexner score was 9. Sixty-eight showed sphincter defects on 3D endoanal ultrasound. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was considered abnormal in 62 cases. Abnormal digital rectal examination showed a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 27.78% in distinguishing small from extensive defects of both sphincters. Five out of eight women with no sphincter defects had only abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination. Abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination had a sensitivity of 65.31% in distinguishing small from extensive external anal sphincter defects. Digital rectal examination sensitivity increased linearly from small to extensive external anal sphincter defects (P=0.001). Women with abnormal resting tone had lower resting pressures than women with normal tone at digital rectal examination (P=0.0001). Women with abnormal squeeze tone had lower incremental pressures than women with normal tone at digital rectal examination (P=0.017). Conclusion Digital rectal examination had good sensitivity and poor specificity in discerning small from severe global anal sphincter defects. Moreover, digital rectal examination had fair sensitivity and poor specificity in grading external anal sphincter defects, and its best accuracy was on complete external anal sphincter lesions. Anal resting and squeeze tone were correlated to anal pressures.

RESUMO Contexto O toque retal é exame clínico rotineiro na avaliação coloproctológica, especialmente em pacientes com incontinência fecal. Entretanto, sua acurácia é variável na predição de defeito esfincteriano ou de alterações nas pressões anais. Objetivo Avaliar a sensibilidade, especificidade, valores preditivo positivo e negativo da avaliação do tônus esfincteriano ao toque retal, em diferenciar defeitos leves de defeitos graves em mulheres com incontinência fecal e correlacionar tônus com pressões anais. Métodos Mulheres portadoras de incontinência fecal e estratificadas de acordo com o grau de defeito ao ultrassom endoanal tridimensional (USEA 3D) foram avaliadas com toque retal e manometria anorretal. O tônus esfincteriano ao toque retal foi comparado com o grau de defeito e com as pressões anais no repouso e na contração. Resultados Das 76 mulheres com sintomas de incontinência fecal, 68 tinham defeito esfincteriano ao USEA 3D. Quarenta pacientes com defeitos graves. Escore de Wexner mediano de 9. O tônus esfincteriano ao toque retal foi considerado alterado em 62 casos. Um toque retal alterado teve alta sensibilidade e baixa especificidade em distinguir defeitos esfincterianos leves de extensos. Das oito pacientes sem defeito muscular, cinco tinham tônus ao toque retal alterado sendo todas no tônus na contração. O toque retal na contração teve moderada sensibilidade e baixa especificidade em distinguir defeitos leves de esfíncter externo do ânus de defeitos extensos. A sensibilidade do toque retal na contração foi melhor quanto mais extensos eram os defeitos de esfíncter externo do ânus (P=0,001). Mulheres com tônus de repouso alterado tinham menores pressões de repouso que aquelas com tônus normal (P=0,0001). Mulheres com tônus de contração alterado tinham menor incremento pressórico que aquelas com tônus normal (P=0,017). Conclusão O toque retal possui boa sensibilidade e baixa especificidade em diferenciar defeitos leves de extensos da musculatura esfincteriana e moderada sensibilidade em diferenciar defeitos de esfíncter externo do ânus, com melhora da sensibilidade quanto mais extensos eram os defeitos de esfíncter externo do ânus. Houve correlação entre tônus e pressões anais no repouso e na contração.

Long-Term Postoperative endoscopic findings after gastric bypass procedure: a co-occurrence analysis / Achados endoscópicos no pós-operatório tardio após bypass gástrico: análise de co-ocorrência

ABSTRACT Background A multitude of endoscopic findings post-gastric bypass procedures have been previously reported in the literature, but to our knowledge, no present rules exist that could guide clinicians regarding which findings should be actively sought, once an initial finding is identified. Objective To identify co-occurrence patterns among endoscopic findings of patients having undergone past gastric bypass procedure. Methods Our registry involves all consecutive patients undergoing an upper endoscopic evaluation after a gastric bypass procedure. We collected information on the presence of the endoscopic findings in post-gastric bypass surgery patients. Co-occurrence evaluation involved the use of intersection, cluster and item factor analyses. Results A total of 396 endoscopic evaluations were made on 339 patients. Most patients were female (81.1%), with an average BMI of 31.88±6.7 at the time of endoscopy. Esophagitis was the most common isolated finding (35.3%). Endoscopic findings clustered around two groups, (1) the ring-related complications involving ring displacement, ring slips and gastric pouch, while (2) stenosis-related findings involved dilation and stenosis (P<0.01). Conclusion While most endoscopic findings after gastric bypass endoscopic procedures are isolated, ring and stenosis-related clusters should be used as a set of rules by clinicians, as it might enhance their probability of finding co-occurring conditions.

RESUMO Contexto Uma grande quantidade de achados endoscópicos após procedimentos de bypass pós-gástricos foram previamente relatados na literatura, mas, que seja de nosso conhecimento, não existem regras atuais que poderiam orientar os médicos sobre quais achados devem procurar uma vez que um achado inicial é identificado. Objetivo Identificar padrões de co-ocorrência entre os achados endoscópicos de pacientes submetidos ao procedimento de bypass gástrico no passado. Métodos O nosso registo envolve pacientes consecutivos submetidos a uma avaliação endoscópica alta após um procedimento de bypass gástrico. Foram colhidas informações sobre a presença de achados endoscópicos após cirúrgica de bypass gástrico à Y de Roux com ou sem anel. Avaliação de co-ocorrência envolveu o uso de cruzamento, agrupamento e fator de produto de análise. Resultados Um total de 396 avaliações endoscópicas foram realizadas em 339 pacientes. A maioria dos pacientes eram do sexo feminino (81,1%), com IMC médio de 31,88±6,7 no momento da endoscopia. Esofagite foi o achado isolado mais comum (35,3%). Achados endoscópicos agrupados em torno de dois grupos, as complicações relacionadas ao anel envolveram deslocamento anel, deslizamentos anel e bolsa gástrica e relacionadas a estenoses envolveram dilatação e estenose (P<0,01). Conclusão Enquanto a maioria dos achados endoscópicos após procedimentos de bypass gástrico são isolados, agrupamento relacionado a anel e estenose poderiam ser usados como um conjunto de regras para médicos, uma vez que pode melhorar a sua probabilidade de ser encontrando em condições co-ocorrentes.

Estudo descritivo dos exames de manometria anorretal realizados no laboratório de motilidade digestiva da Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Porto Alegre, Brasil / A descriptive study of anorectal manometry tests performed in the laboratory of digestive motility of Santa Casa de Misericórdia in Porto Alegre, Brazil

Introdução: A manometria anorretal é, atualmente, o padrão ouro, como método de diagnóstico laboratorial dos distúrbios evacuatórios. O objetivo do presente estudo é descrever uma experiência brasileira, da realização da manometria anorretal, valorizando-a como meio diagnóstico. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo, com revisão dos laudos dos exames, no Laboratório de Motilidade Digestiva da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Brasil. Foram incluídos os pacientes consecutivos, acima de 12 anos de idade, submetidos à manometria anorretal, entre março de 2003 e outubro de 2015. Resultados: No período, foram realizados 1319 exames, em pacientes com média de idade de 53,4±19,4 anos, sendo 70,7% do sexo feminino. A incontinência anal, com 62,4% dos exames, foi a principal indicação da manometria anorretal, a segunda foi constipação com 29,4% e por outros motivos em 8,2% dos pacientes. No período entre 2011 e 2015, houve um aumento significativo dos exames realizados por incontinência anal, em relação ao de 2003 até 2010. Conclusões: As duas principais indicações da manometria anorretal, no presente estudo e na literatura, são constipação e incontinência anal. O aumento significativo dos exames por incontinência anal, após 2011, sugere uma maior consciência dos médicos e pacientes em relação às possibilidades de diagnóstico e tratamento das disfunções evacuatórias. Este é o primeiro estudo brasileiro, que discute as indicações da manometria anorretal e as características dos pacientes encaminhados para o exame. Os autores sugerem a valorização da manometria anorretal como ferramenta de diagnóstico nas disfunções evacuatórias AU)

Introduction: Anorectal manometry is currently the gold standard for laboratory diagnosis of bowel disorders. The aim of the present study is to describe a Brazilian experience in performing anorectal manometry, valuing it as a diagnostic tool. Methods: A retrospective study, with review of test reports, in the Digestive Motility Laboratory of Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Porto Alegre, Brazil. We included consecutive patients, over 12 years of age, undergoing anorectal manometry from March 2003 to October 2015. Results: 1319 tests were performed in the studied period in patients with mean age of 53.4 ± 19.4, 70.7% of whom females. Anal incontinence, accounting for 62.4% of the tests, was the main indication for anorectal manometry, the second was constipation with 29.4%, and other reasons in 8.2% of the patients. In the 2011-2015 period there was a significant increase in the number of tests due to anal incontinence as compared to the 2003-2010 period. Conclusions: The two main indications for anorectal manometry in this study and in the literature are constipation and anal incontinence. The significant increase in the number of tests performed due to anal incontinence after 2011 suggests clinicians' and patients' greater awareness of the possibilities for diagnosis and treatment of bowel dysfunction. This is the first Brazilian study discussing the indications of anorectal manometry and the characteristics of the patients referred to the test. The authors suggest the use of anorectal manometry as a diagnostic tool in evacuation dysfunctions (AU)

Correlation Between Echodefecography and 3-Dimensional Vaginal Ultrasonography in the Detection of Perineal Descent in Women With Constipation Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Defecography is an established method of evaluating dynamic anorectal dysfunction, but conventional defecography does not allow for visualization of anatomic structures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the use of dynamic 3-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography for evaluating perineal descent in comparison with echodefecography (3-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography) and to study the relationship between perineal descent and symptoms and anatomic/functional abnormalities of the pelvic floor. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a large university tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive female patients were eligible if they had pelvic floor dysfunction, obstructed defecation symptoms, and a score >6 on the Cleveland Clinic Florida Constipation Scale. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient underwent both echodefecography and dynamic 3-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography to evaluate posterior pelvic floor dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Normal perineal descent was defined on echodefecography as puborectalis muscle displacement ≤2.5 cm; excessive perineal descent was defined as displacement >2.5 cm. RESULTS: Of 61 women, 29 (48%) had normal perineal descent; 32 (52%) had excessive perineal descent. Endovaginal ultrasonography identified 27 of the 29 patients in the normal group as having anorectal junction displacement ≤1 cm (mean = 0.6 cm; range, 0.1-1.0 cm) and a mean anorectal junction position of 0.6 cm (range, 0-2.3 cm) above the symphysis pubis during the Valsalva maneuver and correctly identified 30 of the 32 patients in the excessive perineal descent group. The κ statistic showed almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.86) between the 2 methods for categorization into the normal and excessive perineal descent groups. Perineal descent was not related to fecal or urinary incontinence or anatomic and functional factors (sphincter defects, pubovisceral muscle defects, levator hiatus area, grade II or III rectocele, intussusception, or anismus). LIMITATIONS: The study did not include a control group without symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography is a reliable technique for assessment of perineal descent. Using this technique, excessive perineal descent can be defined as displacement of the anorectal junction >1 cm and/or its position below the symphysis pubis on Valsalva maneuver.

IS DIGITAL RECTAL EXAM RELIABLE IN GRADING ANAL SPHINCTER DEFECTS?

BACKGROUND: Anal sphincter tone is routinely assessed by digital rectal examination in patients with fecal incontinence, although its accuracy in detecting sphincter defects or separating competent from incompetent muscles has not been established. OBJECTIVE: In this setting, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of digital rectal examination in grading anal defects in order to separate small from extensive cases as depicted on 3D endoanal ultrasound, using a scoring sphincter defect and correlate anal tone to anal pressures. METHODS: Women with fecal incontinence were divided into two groups: small or extensive defects according to the ultrasound scoring system. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of digital rectal examination in grading global and external sphincter defects were calculated. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was compared to resting and incremental pressures. RESULTS: A cohort of 76 consecutive incontinent women were enrolled. The median Wexner score was 9. Sixty-eight showed sphincter defects on 3D endoanal ultrasound. Anal tone at digital rectal examination was considered abnormal in 62 cases. Abnormal digital rectal examination showed a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 27.78% in distinguishing small from extensive defects of both sphincters. Five out of eight women with no sphincter defects had only abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination. Abnormal squeeze tone at digital rectal examination had a sensitivity of 65.31% in distinguishing small from extensive external anal sphincter defects. Digital rectal examination sensitivity increased linearly from small to extensive external anal sphincter defects (P=0.001). Women with abnormal resting tone had lower resting pressures than women with normal tone at digital rectal examination (P=0.0001). Women with abnormal squeeze tone had lower incremental pressures than women with normal tone at digital rectal examination (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: Digital rectal examination had good sensitivity and poor specificity in discerning small from severe global anal sphincter defects. Moreover, digital rectal examination had fair sensitivity and poor specificity in grading external anal sphincter defects, and its best accuracy was on complete external anal sphincter lesions. Anal resting and squeeze tone were correlated to anal pressures.

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Wexner scale in patients with anal incontinence in a Brazilian population.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Jorge and Wexner devised a questionnaire for anal incontinence (AI), known as the Wexner scale (WS). Specific validated questionnaires are essential for the assessment of symptom severity. The objective was to accomplish the cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the WS. METHODS: The WS was validated according to the international criteria. A Brazilian version was tested, including the item "I do not understand" at the end of each question. If this answer was reported at a rate higher than 15 %, the item would be considered difficult to understand and would thus be modified. The final version of the WS and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) were completed by 50 women. Convergent validity was assessed by comparing the data from the first interview of the WS with the FIQL using Spearman's test. Reproducibility was assessed by means of a 2-week test-retest procedure using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: In the initial version of the questionnaire, we did not obtain a response of "I do not understand" at a rate greater than 15 % and this version was considered definitive. A significant negative relationship (r = -0.63) was found between the FIQL total score and the WS. The answers obtained on the "test-re-est" questionnaires showed a significant correlation according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A high level of internal consistency was found, as demonstrated by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.932. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the WS is a reliable, consistent, and valid instrument.