Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery/economics , Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost Sharing/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , United StatesABSTRACT
The escalating cost of civil litigation is leaving many defendants and plaintiffs unable to meet legal expenses such as attorney fees, court charges and others. This significantly impacts their ability to sue or defend themselves effectively. Related to this phenomenon is the ethics discussion around access to justice and crowdfunding. This article explores the dimensions that explain the phenomenon of litigation crowdfunding. Using data from CrowdJustice, a popular Internet fundraising platform used to assist in turning legal cases into publicly funded social cases, we study litigation crowdfunding through the lenses of the number of pledges, goal achievement, target amount, length of description, country, case category, and others. Overall, we see a higher number of cases seeking funding in the categories of human rights, environment, and judicial review. Meanwhile, the platform offers access to funding for other less prominent categories, such as voting rights, personal injury, intellectual property, and data & privacy. At the same time, donors are willing to donate more to cases related to health, politics, and public services. Also noteworthy is that while donors are willing to donate to education, animal welfare, data & privacy, and inquest-related cases, they are not willing to donate large sums to these causes. In terms of lawyer/law firm status, donors are more willing to donate to cases assisted by experienced lawyers. Furthermore, we also note that the higher the number of successful cases an attorney presents, the greater the amount raised. We analyzed valence, arousal, and dominance in case description and found they have a positive relationship with funds raised. Also, when a case description is updated on a crowdsourcing site, it ends up being more successful in funding-at least in the categories of health, immigration, and judicial review. This is not the case, however, for categories such as public service, human rights, and environment. Our research addresses whether litigation crowdfunding, in particular, levels the playing field in terms of opening up financing opportunities for those individuals who cannot afford the costs of litigation. While it may support social justice, ethical concerns with regards to the kinds of campaigns must also be addressed. Most of the ethical concerns center around issues relating to both the fundraisers and donors. Our findings have ethical and social justice implications for crowdfunding platform design.
Subject(s)
Crowdsourcing/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Costs , Healthcare Financing , Social Problems/legislation & jurisprudence , Crowdsourcing/economics , Emigration and Immigration/legislation & jurisprudence , Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Fund Raising/economics , Fund Raising/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Morals , Social Justice/economics , Social Justice/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Problems/economicsSubject(s)
Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Fees, Medical/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Emergency Medical Services/economics , Emergency Medical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Financing, Personal/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospital Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Health/economics , United StatesSubject(s)
Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Benchmarking , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Federal Government , Health Care Costs/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Facility Merger/economics , Health Policy/economics , Insurance, Health/economics , Negotiating , State Government , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, an increasing number of low- and middle-income countries have reduced or removed user fees for pregnant women and/or children under five as a strategy to achieve universal health coverage. Despite the large number of studies (including meta-analyses and systematic reviews) that have shown this strategy's positive effects impact on health-related indicators, the repercussions on women's empowerment or gender equality has been overlooked in the literature. The aim of this study is to systematically review the evidence on the association between user fee policies in low- and middle-income countries and women's empowerment. METHODS: A systematic scoping review was conducted. Two reviewers conducted the database search in six health-focused databases (Pubmed, CAB Abstracts, Embase, Medline, Global Health, EBM Reviews) using English key words. The database search was conducted on February 20, 2020, with no publication date limitation. Qualitative analysis of the included articles was conducted using a thematic analysis approach. The material was organized based on the Gender at Work analytical framework. RESULTS: Out of the 206 initial records, nine articles were included in the review. The study settings include three low-income countries (Burkina Faso, Mali, Sierra Leone) and two lower-middle countries (Kenya, India). Four of them examine a direct association between user fee policies and women's empowerment, while the others address this issue indirectly -mostly by examining gender equality or women's decision-making in the context of free healthcare. The evidence suggests that user fee removal contributes to improving women's capability to make health decisions through different mechanisms, but that the impact is limited. In the context of free healthcare, women's healthcare decision-making power remains undermined because of social norms that are prevalent in the household, the community and the healthcare centers. In addition, women continue to endure limited access to and control over resources (mainly education, information and economic resources). CONCLUSION: User fee removal policies alone are not enough to improve women's healthcare decision-making power. Comprehensive and multi-sectoral approaches are needed to bring sustainable change regarding women's empowerment. A focus on "gender equitable access to healthcare" is needed to reconcile women's empowerment and the efforts to achieve universal health coverage.
Subject(s)
Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy , Poverty , Power, Psychological , Adult , Child , Developing Countries , Female , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnant WomenABSTRACT
Out-of-network air ambulance bills are a pernicious and financially devastating type of surprise medical bill. Courts have broadly interpreted the Airline Deregulation Act to preempt most state attempts to regulate air ambulance billing abuses, so a federal solution is ultimately needed. However, in the absence of a federal fix, states have experimented with a variety of approaches that may survive preemption and provide some protections for their citizens.
Subject(s)
Air Ambulances/economics , Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/economics , Insurance, Health/economics , Federal Government , Government Regulation , Humans , State Government , United StatesSubject(s)
Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Costs/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/economics , Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Voluntary , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Participation in high school sports can impact the physical and mental health of students and influence other positive social and economic outcomes. To maintain sports programs amidst school budget deficits, many districts are implementing sports participation fee policies. Although locally implemented, these district policies can be guided by state law. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to assess state laws and regulations related to high school sports participation fees. DESIGN: Codified statutes and administrative regulations were compiled for all 50 states and the District of Columbia using subscription-based services from LexisNexis and WestlawNext. A content assessment tool was developed to identify key components of school sports participation fee laws and used for summarization. Key components identified included legislation summarization, years in effect, whether it allows fees, whether there is any fee waiver, qualifications needed for fee waiver, whether there is a tax credit, and whether there is disclosure of implementation. State information was aggregated and doubled-coded to ensure reliability. RESULTS: As of December 31, 2016, 18 states had laws governing sports participation fees; 17 of these states' laws allowed for such fees, whereas 1 state prohibited them. Most laws give authority to local school boards to set and collect fees. The laws in 9 states have provisions for a waiver program for students who cannot pay the fees, although they do not all mandate the existence of these waivers. Other content within laws included tax credits and disclosure. CONCLUSION: This analysis shows that states with laws related to school sports participation fees varied in scope and content. Little is known about the implementation or impact of these laws at the local level and the effect of fees on different student population groups. This warrants future investigation.
Subject(s)
Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , School Admission Criteria/trends , Schools/statistics & numerical data , Sports/economics , State Government , Fees and Charges/trends , Health Policy , Humans , Schools/organization & administration , Sports/trends , United StatesSubject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Delivery of Health Care/ethics , Dissent and Disputes , Fees and Charges/ethics , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , State Medicine/ethics , Awards and Prizes , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Emigrants and Immigrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , State Medicine/economicsSubject(s)
Awards and Prizes , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Emigrants and Immigrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Humans , Medical Tourism/economics , Refugees , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Child marriage harms girls' health and hinders progress toward development goals. Randomized studies have shown that providing financial incentives for girls' education can effectively delay marriage, but larger-scale interventions are needed in light of slow progress toward curbing the practice. Many sub-Saharan African countries eliminated primary school tuition fees over the past two decades, resulting in massive increases in enrolment. We measured the effect of these policies on the probability of primary school completion and of marriage before 15 and 18 years of age. METHODS: We used Demographic and Health Surveys to assemble a dataset of women born between 1970 and 2000 in 16 countries. These data were merged with longitudinal information on the timing of tuition fee elimination in each country. We estimated the impact of fee removal using fixed effects regression to compare changes in the prevalence of child marriage over time between women who were exposed to tuition-free primary schooling and those who were not. RESULTS: The removal of tuition fees led to modest average declines in the prevalence of child marriage across all of the treated countries. However, there was substantial heterogeneity between countries. The prevalence of child marriage declined by 10-15 percentage points in Ethiopia and Rwanda following tuition elimination but we found no evidence that the removal of tuition fees had an impact on child marriage rates in Cameroon or Malawi. Reductions in child marriage were not consistently accompanied by increases in the probability of primary school completion. CONCLUSIONS: Eliminating tuition fees led to reductions in child marriage on a national scale in most countries despite challenges with implementation. Improving the quality of the education available may strengthen these effects and bolster progress toward numerous other public health goals.
Subject(s)
Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Marriage/legislation & jurisprudence , Marriage/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Africa South of the Sahara , Child , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Population Dynamics , Rural Population , Schools , Socioeconomic Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) allowed employer plans in the small-group marketplace to charge tobacco users up to 50 percent more for premiums-known as tobacco surcharges-but only if the employer offered a tobacco cessation program and the employee in question failed to participate in it. Using 2016 survey data collected by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust on 278 employers eligible for Small Business Health Options Program, we examined the prevalence of tobacco surcharges and tobacco cessation programs in the small-group market under this policy and found that 16.2 percent of small employers used tobacco surcharges. Overall, 47 percent of employers used tobacco surcharges but failed to offer tobacco cessation counseling. Wellness program prevalence was lower in states that allowed tobacco surcharges, and 10.8 percent of employers in these states were noncompliant with the ACA by charging tobacco users higher premiums without offering cessation programs. Efforts should be undertaken to improve the monitoring and enforcement of ACA tobacco rating rules.