ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many cancer treatments pose a threat to fertility for patients. Semen cryopreservation before cancer treatment is an effective method to preserve fertility. There are sparse long-term data on the usage of samples from Canadian oncology sperm banks. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all oncology sperm banking samples at a Canadian academic fertility centre from 2001 to 2020 was conducted. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2020, 4521 samples were banked by 2504 patients. The most frequent diagnoses among these patients were testicular cancer (29.5%) and lymphoma (26.9%). Of these patients, only 81 (3.2%) patients returned to use their samples with intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment and 62 (2.5%) patients transferred their samples to another clinic. The time between banking and return for usage of the sperm ranged from 1 to 131 months with a median of 18 months after banking. A total of 66 IVF cycles (104 embryo transfers) and 101 IUI cycles from 67 patients were reviewed. Of the 67 couples who used their samples, 53.7% achieved a clinical pregnancy. The clinical pregnancy rate was 6.6% per cycle for IUI and 30.8% per embryo transfer for IVF. Higher sperm concentration or total motile count was not associated with a higher chance of pregnancy. Patients who conceived had on average 1.9 ± 0.8 (p=0.02) more usable embryos per cycle than those who did not conceive. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm cryopreservation provides a valuable option for patients with cancer to achieve parenthood after potentially gonadotoxic cancer treatment. However, the overall usage of banked oncology sperm samples is very low.
Subject(s)
Cryopreservation , Fertility Preservation , Neoplasms , Sperm Banks , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Female , Pregnancy , Canada , Fertility Preservation/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Semen Preservation , Fertilization in Vitro , Pregnancy Rate , Fertility ClinicsABSTRACT
Considering the growing demand for egg donation (ED) and the scarcity of women coming forward as donors to meet this demand, scholars have expressed concerns that clinics may (initially) misrepresent risks to recruit more donors. Additionally, (non-)monetary incentives might be used to try to influence potential donors, which may pressure these women or cause them to dismiss their concerns. Since the internet is often the first source of information and first impressions influence individuals' choices, we examined the websites of fertility clinics to explore how they present medical risks, incentives and emotional appeals. Content Analysis and Frame Analysis were used to analyze a sample of Belgian, Spanish and UK clinic websites. The data show that the websites mainly focus on extreme and dangerous risks and side effects (e.g. severe OHSS) even though it is highly relevant for donors to be informed about less severe but more frequently occurring risks and side effects (e.g. bloating), since those influence donors' daily functioning. The altruistic narrative of ED in Europe was dominant in the data, although some (hidden) financial incentives were found on Spanish and UK websites. Nonetheless, all information about financial incentives still were presented subtly or in combination with altruistic incentives.
Subject(s)
Internet , Motivation , Oocyte Donation , Humans , Female , United Kingdom , Spain , Belgium , Fertility Clinics , Tissue Donors/psychologyABSTRACT
Context In recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic became a threat to human health and induced global concern. The SARS-CoV-2 virus causes various disorders in the body's systems, and the reproductive system is no exception. Further, the rate of infertile couples is increasing and part of this is related to male infertility. Aims The aim of the present study was to investigate the impacts of COVID-19 infection history on semen quality in men referred to public and private infertility centres. Methods In this research, patients were divided into two groups: 88 men with a history of COVID-19 (Covid+) and 51 men without (Covid-). After semen collection, sperm parameters, fertilisation rate and oxidative stress were investigated. Key results Sperms with normal morphology and mature chromatin in patients with COVID-19 infection history decreased, and seminal oxidative stress and sperm DNA fragmentation were increased; moreover, the fertilisation rate in the Covid+ group decreased in compare to the Covid- group. Conclusion COVID-19 infection increases oxidative stress in the semen, so has a negative effect on some sperm parameters and fertilisation rate. Implications COVID-19 infection impairs semen quality by increasing in oxidative stress, thus reducing the fertility potential.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , DNA Fragmentation , Infertility, Male , Oxidative Stress , Semen Analysis , Semen , Spermatozoa , Humans , Male , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Adult , Infertility, Male/virology , Infertility, Male/epidemiology , Oxidative Stress/physiology , Spermatozoa/virology , Spermatozoa/pathology , Semen/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Fertility Clinics , Sperm MotilityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Son preference is known to be prevalent in developing countries and has dire consequences for the family, particularly girls and women. It is speculated that the prevalence of son preference may be high among fertility clinic attendees, and that son preference may be the reason for seeking fertility care in Nigeria. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and risk factors for son preference among fertility seekers in Enugu, Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaire-based cross-sectional study of fertility clinic attendees from the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla Enugu and the Pink Petals Fertility Clinic Enugu from April 1 to September 30, 2023. Eligible and consenting participants were interviewed. Data collection was with a pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire, which contained three sections: biodata, obstetrics and gynecological data and 3-point son preference questions. The proportion of those who scored 3 (son preference) was documented. The analysis was both descriptive and inferential using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0 Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp. RESULTS: Of the 422 participants interviewed, 416 (98.6%) completed the study with a nonresponse rate of 6 (1.4%). The overall prevalence of son preference was 10.1% (42/416) and all 42 (10.1%) were in the clinic to have a male baby. The risk factors for son preference were less than tertiary education (P < 0.001, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 6.46, confidence interval [CI] 2.79-14.98) and family pressure to have a male baby (P = 0.03, AOR = 3.41, CI 1.72-7.13). CONCLUSIONS: One in 10 couples who attend an infertility clinic in Enugu, Nigeria, has a preference for son, and having a male child is the sole purpose of such a visit. Being under family pressure and not having tertiary education were the predictive risk factors for son preference in the study population.
Résumé Contexte:La préférence pour les garçons est connue pour être répandue dans les pays en développement et a des conséquences désastreuses sur la famille, en particulier sur les filles. et les femmes. On suppose que la prévalence de la préférence pour les garçons pourrait être élevée parmi les prestataires des cliniques de fertilité, et que la préférence pour les garçons pourrait être élevée. être la raison pour laquelle vous recherchez des soins de fertilité au Nigeria.Objectifs:Déterminer la prévalence et les facteurs de risque de préférence pour les garçons parmi les facteurs de fécondité. chercheurs à Enugu, au Nigeria.Matériels et méthodes:Étude transversale basée sur un questionnaire auprès de participantes aux cliniques de fertilité de l'Université de l'hôpital universitaire du Nigeria Ituku Ozalla Enugu et de la clinique de fertilité Pink Petals Enugu du 1er avril au 30 septembre 2023. Éligible et les participants consentants ont été interrogés. La collecte des données s'est faite à l'aide d'un questionnaire pré-testé administré par l'intervieweur, qui contenait trois sections: données biologiques, données obstétricales et gynécologiques et questions de préférence pour les fils en 3 points. La proportion de ceux qui ont obtenu un score de 3 (fils préférence) a été documentée. L'analyse était à la fois descriptive et inférentielle à l'aide des statistiques IBM SPSS pour Windows, version 22.0 Armonk, NY, États-Unis: IBM Corp.Résultats:Sur les 422 participants interrogés, 416 (98.6 %) ont terminé l'étude avec un taux de non-réponse de 6 (1.4 %). La prévalence globale de la préférence pour les garçons était de 10.1 % (42/416) et les 42 (10.1 %) étaient toutes à la clinique pour avoir un bébé de sexe masculin. Les facteurs de risque pour la préférence pour les garçons étaient inférieures à l'enseignement supérieur ( P < 0.001, rapport de cotes ajusté [AOR] = 6.46, intervalle de confiance [CI] 2.7914.98) et pression familiale pour avoir un bébé de sexe masculin ( P = 0.03, AOR = 3.41, CI 1.727.13).Conclusions:un couple sur 10 qui fréquente une clinique d'infertilité à Enugu, au Nigeria, a une préférence pour les fils, et avoir un enfant de sexe masculin est le seul objectif d'une telle visite. Être sous la pression familiale et non avoir fait des études supérieures était le facteur de risque prédictif de la préférence pour les garçons dans la population étudiée.
Subject(s)
Fertility Clinics , Infertility , Humans , Male , Nigeria/epidemiology , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Infertility/psychology , Infertility/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Young Adult , Family Characteristics , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychologyABSTRACT
In medically assisted reproduction (MAR) success has mostly been measured in terms of achieving (healthy) livebirths. We argue this focus is too narrow and that success should be measured in terms of alleviating patient suffering caused by an unfulfilled child wish. The major implication is that clinics must better tailored care to effectively support patients who do not have child(ren) with treatment. First, we argue that clinics have a duty of care towards patients for whom MAR does not result in children because this is a common treatment outcome, because treatment is burdensome and creates new losses for patients, and because the field has the necessary expertise to provide support and it is part of patient-centred care. Then, we examine concerns about the adequacy of addressing the possibility that treatment may end without children, namely, that this may hinder patients' hope and put them off doing treatment, and that it may be perceived as a sign of clinical incompetence, as well as concerns about the required skill set. We end with a set of research-informed recommendations to promote healthy adjustment to ending fertility treatment without children. These focus on the need to reconceptualize 'success' and 'failure' in MAR, to promote open discussion about the possibility of treatment not resulting in children and encourage patients to develop 'plan(s) B', to support patients who end treatment without children, and to create the organizational structures needed to support clinics and healthcare professionals in this endeavour.
Subject(s)
Fertility Clinics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Infertility/therapy , Patient-Centered CareABSTRACT
This study aims to systematically analyze the provision of information on Time-lapse Imaging (TLI) by UK fertility clinic websites. We conducted an analysis of 106 clinic websites that offer fertility treatment to self-funded patients. The analysis aimed to examine whether these clinics offer TLI, the associated cost for patients, and the clarity and quality of the provided information. Out of the 106 websites analysed, 71 (67%) claimed to offer TLI. Among these websites, 25 (35.2%) mentioned charging patients between £300 and £850, 25 (35.8%) claimed not to charge patients, and 21 (29.6%) did not provide any cost information for TLI. Furthermore, 64 (90.1%) websites made claims or implied that TLI leads to improved clinical outcomes by enhancing embryo selection. Notably, 34 (47.9%) websites did not mention or provide any links to the HFEA rating system. It is crucial to provide patients with clear and accurate information to enable them to make fully informed decisions about TLI, particularly when they are responsible for the associated costs. The findings of this study raise concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the information available on fertility clinic websites, which are typically the primary source of information for patients.
Subject(s)
Fertility Clinics , Internet , Time-Lapse Imaging , Humans , United Kingdom , Fertility Clinics/standards , Guideline Adherence , Female , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standardsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Northern Ontario has a population of approximately 800,000 people distributed over 806,707 km2. Before 2018, the only fertility treatment centre in Northern Ontario was located in Thunder Bay; many patients travelled south for care. In 2018, the Northeastern Ontario Women's Health Network (NEOWHN) opened in Sudbury, providing fertility treatments to people living in Northeastern Ontario. The goal of this study was to determine if proximity to this new fertility centre increases one's chance of achieving pregnancy when undergoing fertility treatment. Secondary outcomes included the quantity and types of fertility investigations and treatments completed by patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients seeking fertility treatment at NEOWHN between January 2019 and December 2020. Traveling >100 km to access healthcare was considered to be a clinically significant determinant of health. RESULTS: Seven hundred and 5 patients were seen in consultation for fertility services at NEOWHN during the study period. One hundred eighty-one of 478 (37.9%) patients living <100 km from NEOWHN achieved pregnancy compared to 39 of 227 (17.2%) patients living >100 km from NEOWHN (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Living in proximity (<100 km) to NEOWHN increased the likelihood that individuals in Northeastern Ontario would seek fertility services and would achieve pregnancy. Financial constraints and inaccessibility likely play a role in this, but further studies are needed to explain this difference. INTRODUCTION: Le Nord de l'Ontario compte une population d'environ 800,000 personnes réparties sur 806,707 km2. Avant 2018, le seul centre de traitement de la fertilité du Nord de l'Ontario était situé à Thunder Bay; de nombreux patients SE rendaient dans le sud pour recevoir des soins. En 2018, le Northeastern Ontario Women's Health Network (NEOWHN-le Réseau de santé des femmes du Nord-Est de l'Ontario) a ouvert ses portes à Sudbury, offrant des traitements de fertilité aux personnes vivant dans le Nord-Est de l'Ontario. L'objectif de cette étude était de déterminer si la proximité de ce nouveau centre de fertilité augmente les chances d'obtenir une grossesse lors d'un traitement de fertilité. Les résultats secondaires comprenaient la quantité et les types d'examens et de traitements de fertilité effectués par les patients. MTHODES: Une étude rétrospective des dossiers a été réalisée pour tous les patients cherchant un traitement de fertilité au NEOWHN entre janvier 2019 et décembre 2020. Le fait de voyager >100 km pour accéder aux soins de santé a été considéré comme un déterminant de la santé cliniquement significatif. RSULTATS: Seven hundred and 5 patients ont été vus en consultation pour des services de fertilité au NEOWHN pendant la période d'étude. One hundred eighty-one des 478 (37.9%) patientes vivant à moins de 100 km du NEOWHN ont obtenu une grossesse, contre 39 des 227 (17.2%) patientes vivant à plus de 100 km du NEOWHN (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Le fait de vivre à proximité (<100 km) du NEOWHN augmente la probabilité que les habitants du Nord-Est de l'Ontario aient recours à des services de fertilité et obtiennent une grossesse. Les contraintes financières et l'inaccessibilité jouent probablement un rôle à cet égard, mais d'autres études sont nécessaires pour expliquer cette différence.
Subject(s)
Fertility Clinics , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Female , Ontario , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Fertility Clinics/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
Fertility Clinics , Humans , Fertility Clinics/standards , Fertility Clinics/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Infertility/therapy , Infertility/diagnosis , Infertility/physiopathology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/standards , Efficiency, Organizational , Total Quality ManagementABSTRACT
PROBLEM: There has been an increase in the number of single women deciding to have children through the use of medically assisted reproduction (MAR). These women are referred to as 'single mothers by choice' (SMC). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown how SMC can feel stigmatised. AIM: Explore if single women seeking fertility treatment in Denmark feel stigmatised. METHODS: Six single women undergoing MAR at a public fertility clinic in Denmark were interviewed. The interviews were audiotaped, anonymised, and transcribed in full, after provided written consent by the participants to take part in the study. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS: The women would have preferred to have a child in a relationship with a partner. Despite their dream of the nuclear family meaning a family group consisting of two parents and their children (one or more), the women choose to become SMC because motherhood was of such importance, and they feared they would otherwise become too old to have children. The participants did not experience stigma or negative responses to their decision, but they all had an awareness of the prejudices other people might have towards SMC. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the understanding of the experiences of single women seeking fertility treatment in a welfare state where there are no differences in the possibilities for different social classes to seek MAR.
Subject(s)
Mothers , Humans , Female , Denmark , Adult , Pilot Projects , Mothers/psychology , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Qualitative Research , Choice Behavior , Fertility Clinics/statistics & numerical data , Single Person/psychology , Single Person/statistics & numerical data , Single Parent/psychology , Single Parent/statistics & numerical data , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the main arguments of reproductive healthcare providers in favour or against their involvement in offering expanded carrier screening (ECS) for recessive disorders at fertility clinics in the Netherlands? DESIGN: Semi-structured interview study with 20 reproductive healthcare providers between May 2020 and January 2021. Participants included 11 gynaecologists, seven fertility doctors, one nurse practitioner and one clinical embryologist, recruited from academic medical centres (nâ¯=â¯13), peripheral facilities associated with academic centres (nâ¯=â¯4), and independent fertility treatment centres (nâ¯=â¯3) in the Netherlands. An interview guide was developed, and thematic content analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti software. RESULTS: Arguments of reproductive healthcare providers in favour of their potential involvement in offering ECS included: (i) opportunities offered by the setting; (ii) motivation to assist in reproduction and prevent suffering; and (iii) to counter unwanted commercialization offers. Arguments against involvement included: (i) lack of knowledge and familiarity with offering ECS; (ii) insufficient staff and resources, and potential high costs for clinics and/or couples; (iii) the emotional impact it may have on couples; (iv) perceived complexity of counselling and expected elongation of waiting lists; and (v) expected low impact on reducing the burden of diseases. Participants felt that more evidence and research on the costs-benefits, implications and demand are needed prior to their involvement. CONCLUSION: While agreeing that the field of medically assisted reproduction provides a unique opportunity to offer ECS, reproductive healthcare workers feel a lack of capability and limited motivation to offer ECS to all or a selection of couples at their fertility clinics.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Fertility Clinics , Genetic Carrier Screening , Qualitative Research , Humans , Female , Genetic Carrier Screening/methods , Male , Health Personnel/psychology , Netherlands , Adult , Genetic Counseling/psychologyABSTRACT
Previous studies have examined the predictors of PFAS concentrations among pregnant women and children. However, no study has explored the predictors of preconception PFAS concentrations among couples in the United States. This study included 572 females and 279 males (249 couples) who attended a U.S. fertility clinic between 2005 and 2019. Questionnaire information on demographics, reproductive history, and lifestyles and serum samples quantified for PFAS concentrations were collected at study enrollment. We examined the PFAS distribution and correlation within couples. We used Ridge regressions to predict the serum concentration of each PFAS in females and males using data of (1) socio-demographic and reproductive history, (2) diet, (3) behavioral factors, and (4) all factors included in (1) to (3) after accounting for temporal exposure trends. We used general linear models for univariate association of each factor with the PFAS concentration. We found moderate to high correlations for PFAS concentrations within couples. Among all examined factors, diet explained more of the variation in PFAS concentrations (1-48%), while behavioral factors explained the least (0-4%). Individuals reporting White race, with a higher body mass index, and nulliparous women had higher PFAS concentrations than others. Fish and shellfish consumption was positively associated with PFAS concentrations among both females and males, while intake of beans (females), peas (male), kale (females), and tortilla (both) was inversely associated with PFAS concentrations. Our findings provide important data for identifying sources of couples' PFAS exposure and informing interventions to reduce PFAS exposure in the preconception period.
Subject(s)
Alkanesulfonic Acids , Environmental Pollutants , Fluorocarbons , Child , Animals , Humans , Male , Female , Pregnancy , United States , Fertility Clinics , Diet , Linear ModelsABSTRACT
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure was associated with changes in thyroid function in pregnant mothers and the general population. Limited such evidence exists in other susceptible populations such as females with fertility problems. This cross-sectional study included 287 females seeking medically assisted reproduction at a fertility clinic in Massachusetts, United States, between 2005 and 2019. Six long-alkyl chain PFAS, thyroid hormones, and autoimmune antibodies were quantified in baseline serum samples. We used generalized linear models and quantile g-computation to evaluate associations of individual PFAS and their total mixture with thyroid biomarkers. Most females were White individuals (82.7%), had graduate degrees (57.8%), and nearly half had unexplained subfertility (45.9%). Serum concentrations of all examined PFAS and their mixture were significantly associated with 2.6%-5.6% lower total triiodothyronine (TT3) concentrations. Serum concentrations of perfluorononanoate (PFNA), perfluorodecanoate (PFDA), and perfluoroundecanoate (PFUnDA), and of the total mixture were associated with higher ratios of free thyroxine (FT4) to free triiodothyronine (FT3). No associations were found for PFAS and TSH or autoimmune antibodies. Our findings support the thyroid-disrupting effect of long alkyl-chain PFAS among a vulnerable population of subfertile females.
Subject(s)
Alkanesulfonic Acids , Environmental Pollutants , Fluorocarbons , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Thyroid Gland , Triiodothyronine , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fertility Clinics , Thyroid Hormones , BiomarkersABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Experimental studies have suggested exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) and its alternatives, such as bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS), may exert adverse effects on ovarian reserve, but human evidence is limited. Moreover, the potential predictors of exposure to bisphenols among women seeking infertility treatment have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether individual or mixture of BPA, BPF, and BPS were related to antral follicle count (AFC), and further identify the predictors of exposure to bisphenols among women seeking assisted reproductive treatment. METHODS: A total of 111 women from a reproductive center in Shenyang, China were enrolled in this study from September 2020 to February 2021. The concentrations of urinary BPA, BPF, and BPS were measured using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadruple mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). AFC was measured by two infertility physicians through transvaginal ultrasonography on the 2-5 days of a natural cycle. Demographic characteristics, dietary habits, and lifestyles were obtained by questionnaires. The associations between individual and mixture of urinary bisphenols concentrations (BPA, BPF, and BPS) and AFC were assessed by the Poisson regression models and the quantile-based g-computation (QGC) model, respectively. The potential predictors of exposure to bisphenols were identified by the multivariate linear regression models. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, elevated urinary concentrations of BPA, BPF and BPS were associated with reduced AFC (ß = -0.016; 95%CI: -0.025, -0.006 in BPA; ß = -0.017; 95%CI: -0.029, -0.004 in BPF; ß = -0.128; 95%CI: -0.197, -0.060 in BPS). A quantile increase in the bisphenols mixture was negatively associated with AFC (ß = -0.101; 95%CI: -0.173, -0.030). Intake of fried food had higher urinary concentrations of BPF, BPS, and total bisphenols (∑BPs) than women who did not eat, and age was related to increased urinary BPF concentrations. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that exposure to individual BPA, BPF, BPS and bisphenol mixtures were associated with impaired ovarian reserve. Furthermore, the intake of fried food, as identified in this study, could serve as an important bisphenols exposure route for reproductive-aged women.
Subject(s)
Benzhydryl Compounds , Ovarian Follicle , Phenols , Sulfones , Adult , Female , Humans , Benzhydryl Compounds/urine , China , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Pollutants/urine , Fertility Clinics , Ovarian Follicle/drug effects , Phenols/urine , Sulfones/urine , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
Introduction: Polycystic ovary syndrome is a common hormonal disorder that affects women of reproductive age which is characterized by hyperandrogenism, polycystic ovarian morphology, ovarian dysfunction, and hyperinsulinemia. Increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease and higher cardiovascular morbidity is seen in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of high serum homocysteine levels among women with polycystic ovarian syndrome visiting an infertility clinic of a tertiary care centre. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among women with polycystic ovarian syndrome visiting an infertility clinic at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of a tertiary care centre from 1 June 2023 to 1 September 2023. The study was conducted after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee. Biochemical analysis of gonadal hormones, serum homocysteine and lipid profile was done. A convenience sampling method was used. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% confidence interval. Results: Among 76 women, the prevalence of high serum homocysteine level was found in 54 (71.05%) (60.86-81.25, 95% Confidence Interval). The mean age of patients was 27.46±6.18 years. Conclusions: The prevalence of high homocysteine levels among women with polycystic ovarian syndrome is higher than other studies done in similar settings. Keywords: body mass index; homocysteine; polycystic ovary syndrome; prevalence.
Subject(s)
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fertility Clinics , Tertiary Care Centers , Body Mass IndexABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This research was conducted to assess access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and the current status of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) program that have been implemented in Indonesia over the last 10 years. METHODS: We established a retrospective cohort study and descriptive analysis of the current state of access to infertility care in Indonesia. The data were collected from all IVF centers, clinics, and hospitals in Indonesia from 2011 to 2020, including the number of IVF clinics, total ART cycles, retrieved fresh and frozen embryos, average age of IVF patients, IVF pregnancy rate, and causes of infertility. RESULTS: The number of reported fertility clinics in Indonesia has increased from 14 clinics in 2011 to 41 clinics by 2020. As many as 69 569 ART cycles were conducted over the past 10 years, of which 51 892 cycles used fresh embryos and 17 677 cycles used frozen embryos. The leading cause of consecutive infertility diagnosis was male infertility. Nearly half of the women who underwent IVF procedures (48.9%) were under 35 years old. The pregnancy rate outcome of women who underwent IVF ranged from 24.6% to 37.3%. CONCLUSION: Developments in ART in Indonesia have led to improvements in the ART cycles performed throughout the 10 year period. The identification of key areas that require improvement can provide an opportunity to enhance access to infertility care.
Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Fertilization in Vitro , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Indonesia/epidemiology , Female , Retrospective Studies , Fertilization in Vitro/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Adult , Male , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Rate , Infertility/therapy , Infertility/epidemiology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Fertility Clinics/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study assessed the visibility of embryologists on fertility clinic websites among Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) member clinics. METHODS: During a 1-month interval (March 2022), all Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) member fertility clinic websites were evaluated. The professional representation of the primary care team was examined including specialties, the presence of headshots, and biographies. RESULTS: A total of 446 fertility clinic websites were scanned in the search. The embryology team has the least common professional identification by their names (53.58%) compared to gynecology clinicians (96.21%, p < 0.001) and nurses (55.58%, p < 0.001). This trend also applies to other types of professional identifiers, such as headshots and biographies. Professional headshots of embryologists (50.34%) were less prominent than those of gynecology clinicians (93.51%, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed in the biographies of the embryology team (47.20%) compared to gynecology clinicians (95.08%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that embryologists have low professional visibility on fertility clinic websites. Fertility clinics may prioritize enhancing the online visibility of their embryology laboratory team. This approach could potentially enhance the recognition of their team, foster transparency, and provide accessible information about the skills and expertise of healthcare professionals involved in the treatment process.
Subject(s)
Fertility Clinics , Gynecology , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , InternetABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION: Is patient satisfaction higher with telemedicine visits or in-person visits for an initial consultation in the ambulatory fertility setting? DESIGN: A survey study of fertility patients who had an initial consultation visit between January 2018 and September 2022 was conducted using a nationally distributed survey. Patient satisfaction and other outcomes pertaining to patient experience were compared between telemedicine and in-person visits. RESULTS: In total, 682 participants completed the survey nationwide; of these, 425 respondents had an in-person visit and 257 respondents had a telemedicine visit. Age, geographic region, race, education level, employment status, income level and marital status did not differ between the groups. Overall, 69.6% of participants were satisfied with telemedicine visits, with improvement in partner participation. More patients were satisfied with in-person visits compared with telemedicine visits (82.6% versus 69.6%, P<0.001), and more patients preferred in-person visits to telemedicine visits regardless of the type of appointment they had for their initial visit. In a subgroup analysis of patients seen during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, patients who had telemedicine visits were younger, more likely to be White, more educated and had a higher income compared with patients who had in-person visits. CONCLUSIONS: Previously, the impact of telemedicine in the fertility setting was largely unknown. This study demonstrated that the majority of patients were satisfied with health care through telemedicine visits. However, patients were more satisfied with in-person visits, and preferred in-person visits to telemedicine visits. Further studies are needed to help clarify the differences in patient satisfaction with visit type, and to assess the role of telemedicine in future fertility care.