Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 14(9): e0222871, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31557198

ABSTRACT

The understanding of mammalian spermatogenesis niche factors active during sexual development may be leveraged to impact reproduction in farm animals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of r-met-hu/G-CSF (filgrastim) on prepubertal sexual development of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) and ram lambs (Ovis aries). Individuals of both species were administered r-met-hu/G-CSF daily for 4 days. During and after administration protocols, testicular function and development were assessed through hematological responses, hormonal profiles (gonadotropins, testosterone and cortisol) testicular morphometry and germ cell kinetics. As expected, r-met-hu/G-CSF acutely mobilized white-lineage blood cells in both species. LH was increased by r-met-hu/G-CSF in guinea pigs (P<0.01) but T remained unchanged. In ram lambs gonadotropins and T increased in dose-response fashion (P<0.01) while cortisol values were stable and similar in treated and control animals (P>0.05). In guinea pigs there were no differences in testicular weights and volumes 2-mo after r-met-hu/G-CSF application (P>0.05). However, ram lambs showed a dose-response effect regarding testis weight (P<0.05). 66.66% of ram lambs had initial testes not yet in meiosis or starting the first spermatogenic wave. After 60-days only 25% of control animals were pubertal while all treated animals (1140-µg) had reached puberty. We propose an integrated hypothesis that G-CSF can stimulate spermatogenesis through two possible ways. 1) r-met-hu/G-CSF may go through the brain blood barrier and once there it can stimulate GnRH-neurons to release GnRH with the subsequent release of gonadotrophins. 2) a local testicular effect through stimulation of steroidogenesis that enhances spermiogenesis via testosterone production and a direct stimulation over spermatogonial stem cells self-renewal. In conclusion, this study shows that r-met-hu/G-CSF differentially affects prepubertal sexual development in hystricomorpha and ovine species, a relevant fact to consider when designing methods to hasten sexual developmental in mammalian species.


Subject(s)
Filgrastim/administration & dosage , Sexual Maturation/drug effects , Spermatogenesis/drug effects , Animals , Animals, Domestic/physiology , Blood-Brain Barrier/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Filgrastim/pharmacokinetics , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/metabolism , Guinea Pigs , Male , Neurons/drug effects , Neurons/metabolism , Sheep, Domestic , Testis/drug effects , Testis/growth & development , Testis/metabolism , Testosterone/metabolism
2.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 71(10): 586-592, 2016 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27759847

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:: To compare the efficacy and safety of two filgrastim formulations for controlling chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and to evaluate the non-inferiority of the test drug relative to the originator. METHODS:: This phase III non-inferiority study had a randomized, multicenter, and open-label design. The patients were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 with a follow-up period of 6 weeks for each patient. In both study arms, filgrastim was administered subcutaneously at a daily dose of 5 mg/kg body weight. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade 4 neutropenia in the first treatment cycle. The secondary endpoints were the duration of grade 4 neutropenia, the generation of anti-filgrastim antibodies, and the rates of adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia of any grade. RESULTS:: The primary efficacy analysis demonstrated the non-inferiority of the test drug compared with the originator drug; the upper limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the rate of neutropenia between the two groups (12.61%) was lower than the established margin of non-inferiority. The two treatments were similar with respect to the secondary endpoints and safety. CONCLUSION:: The efficacy and safety profile of the test drug were similar to those of the originator product based on the rate of grade 4 neutropenia in the first treatment cycle. This study supports Anvisa's approval of the first biosimilar drug manufactured by the Brazilian industry (Fiprima¯).


Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Filgrastim/therapeutic use , Hematologic Agents/therapeutic use , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neutropenia/prevention & control , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics , Female , Filgrastim/pharmacokinetics , Hematologic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Middle Aged , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clinics ; Clinics;71(10): 586-592, Oct. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-796864

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of two filgrastim formulations for controlling chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and to evaluate the non-inferiority of the test drug relative to the originator. METHODS: This phase III non-inferiority study had a randomized, multicenter, and open-label design. The patients were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 with a follow-up period of 6 weeks for each patient. In both study arms, filgrastim was administered subcutaneously at a daily dose of 5 mg/kg body weight. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade 4 neutropenia in the first treatment cycle. The secondary endpoints were the duration of grade 4 neutropenia, the generation of anti-filgrastim antibodies, and the rates of adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia of any grade. RESULTS: The primary efficacy analysis demonstrated the non-inferiority of the test drug compared with the originator drug; the upper limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the rate of neutropenia between the two groups (12.61%) was lower than the established margin of non-inferiority. The two treatments were similar with respect to the secondary endpoints and safety. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety profile of the test drug were similar to those of the originator product based on the rate of grade 4 neutropenia in the first treatment cycle. This study supports Anvisa’s approval of the first biosimilar drug manufactured by the Brazilian industry (Fiprima¯).


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Filgrastim/therapeutic use , Hematologic Agents/therapeutic use , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neutropenia/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics , Filgrastim/pharmacokinetics , Hematologic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Leukocyte Count , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL