Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Nutrients ; 13(6)2021 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34072684

ABSTRACT

Unhealthy diets are underpinned by the over-consumption of packaged products. Data describing the ingredient composition of these products is limited. We sought to define the ingredients used in Australian packaged foods and beverages and assess associations between the number of ingredients and existing health indicators. Statements of ingredients were disaggregated, creating separate fields for each ingredient and sub-ingredient. Ingredients were categorised and the average number of ingredients per product was calculated. Associations between number of ingredients and both the nutrient-based Health Star Rating (HSR) and the NOVA level-of-processing classification were assessed. A total of 24,229 products, listing 233,113 ingredients, were included. Products had between 1 and 62 ingredients (median (Interquartile range (IQR)): 8 (3-14)). We identified 915 unique ingredients, which we organised into 17 major and 138 minor categories. 'Additives' were contained in the largest proportion of products (64.6%, (15,652/24,229)). The median number of ingredients per product was significantly lower in products with the optimum 5-star HSR (when compared to all other HSR score groups, p-value < 0.001) and significantly higher in products classified as ultra-processed (when compared to all other NOVA classification groups, p-value < 0.001). There is a strong relationship between the number of ingredients in a product and indicators of nutritional quality and level of processing.


Subject(s)
Beverages/classification , Fast Foods/classification , Food Labeling/classification , Supermarkets , Australia , Nutritive Value
2.
Nutrients ; 12(12)2020 Dec 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33352995

ABSTRACT

The Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation has supported the recommendations set out in the 2019 Health Star Rating System Five Year Review Report. Specifically, the forum supported, in principle, Recommendation 9, to mandate the Health Star Rating if clear uptake targets were not achieved while the system is voluntary. Given that mandatory labelling is being considered, it is important to investigate how much consumers value the Health Star Rating in order to understand potential consumer uptake and inform industry. The aim of this study was to assess consumers' valuation of the Health Star Rating system by analysing their willingness to pay for a packaged food product with the Health Star Rating label, utilising a double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation approach. The results indicate that almost two-thirds of Australian household grocery shoppers were willing to pay more for a product with the Health Star Rating, on average up to an additional 3.7% of the price of the product. However, public health nutrition benefits associated with consumers' willingness to pay more for products with the Health Star Rating is currently limited by the lack of guarantee of the systems' accuracy. Given consumer support, a well validated and comprehensive Health Star Rating labelling system can potentially improve health outcomes, cost effectiveness and reduce environmental impacts.


Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Diet, Healthy/economics , Food Labeling/standards , Nutrition Policy , Nutritive Value , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia , Female , Food Labeling/classification , Food Labeling/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Policy/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; 43(2): 169-176, mayo-ago. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-199148

ABSTRACT

FUNDAMENTO: Analizar qué alimentos y bebidas, de los que se incluyen con más frecuencia en la publicidad buzoneada por los supermercados en el Principado de Asturias, pueden ser considerados prescindibles para el consumo de la población, y comparar su precio con el de los alimentos esenciales. MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo, transversal, de la publicidad buzoneada en siete domicilios de Asturias (España) por cuatro cadenas de supermercados entre julio y diciembre de 2018. Se registró el tipo de producto, su clasificación como esencial o prescindible y su precio, comparándolos entre cadenas de supermercados. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 14.314 productos. "Dulces, bollería, chocolates, azúcares y edulcorantes" (15,3 %), "leche y derivados" (9,7 %), "carnes procesadas" y "bebidas alcohólicas" (8,9 % cada categoría) y "precocinados" (8,4 %). Se observó un predominio de productos considerados prescindibles (61,9 %). Se observaron diferencias significativas en cuanto al tipo de producto según la cadena comercial. El precio medio de los productos esenciales fue menor que el de los prescindibles, tanto globalmente como en cada cadena comercial, siendo la diferencia significativa en una de ellas. CONCLUSIONES: En la publicidad buzoneada por los supermercados en los domicilios de Asturias predominan los productos considerados como prescindibles desde el punto de vista de la salud como ricos en azúcar, carnes procesadas y alcohol. En sentido positivo destaca que el precio de los productos esenciales, como frutas y verduras frescas, fue, de media, significativamente menor que el de los prescindibles


BACKGROUND: To analyze which foods and beverages, frequently included in advertising mail delivered by supermarkets in the Principality of Asturias, can be considered essential for consumption by the population, as well as to compare their price with that of essential products. METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive study of supermarket sales circulars delivered to seven homes in Asturias (Spain) by four supermarket chains from July to December 2018. Type of product, its classification as essential or non-essential and mean price of the advertised product were registered. RESULTS: The study identified 14,314 products, mostly belonging to the categories: "cakes, pastries, chocolate, sugar, and sweeteners" (15.3 %), "milk and milk derivatives" (9.7 %), "processed meats".and "alcoholic beverages" (8.9 % each) and "ready-made" (8.4 %). Products considered to be non-essential were found to predominate (61.9 %). Significant differences in product type were observed between supermarket chains. Essential products had a lower mean price than the non-essential products, both overall and for each supermarket chain, and was significantly lower for one of them. CONCLUSIONS: Products which are non-essential from the point of view of health, such as sugar-rich products, processed meats, and alcoholic beverages, dominated the advertising mail delivered door-to-door by supermarkets in the Principality of Asturias. On a positive note, the prices of essential products, such as fresh fruit and vegetables, were, on average, significantly lower than the prices of non-essential products


Subject(s)
Humans , Food Analysis/methods , Food Labeling/classification , Beverages/analysis , Food Publicity , Food and Nutritional Health Promotion , Consumer Product Safety/standards , Products of Consumer Direct Sale , Cross-Sectional Studies , Alcoholic Beverages/analysis , Spain
4.
Pediatr. aten. prim ; 22(86): 141-150, abr.-jun. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-198527

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: en España existe un elevado consumo de galletas en la población infantil. Son productos ultraprocesados de alto contenido energético y densidad calórica, en general con azúcar añadido y grasas poco saludables. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio descriptivo transversal sobre características y composición nutricional de galletas disponibles en supermercados españoles y comparativo entre las dirigidas al público infantil y el resto. RESULTADOS: se analizaron 350 galletas: valor energético medio 471,86 ± 35,83 kcal/100 g. El 53,1% contenían grasas saturadas, aceite de palma el 47,1% y azúcar añadido el 90%. Mediana de azúcares 25 g/100 g (rango intercuartílico [RI]: 20-33). Mediana de fibra alimentaria 3,2 g/100 g (RI: 2,4-5,2); 86 galletas mostraban publicidad sobre fibra y 95,34% indicaban la cantidad, mediana de 5,45 g/100 g (RI: 4-7,9). Se analizaron 53 galletas (15,1%) dirigidas al público infantil. Valor energético medio 466,47 ± 19,31 kcal/100 g. El aceite de oliva/girasol alto oleico (GAO) fue la grasa principal en el 67,9%. Aceite de palma presente en el 37,7% y azúcar añadido en 98,1% (media 25,88 ± 6,82 g/100 g). Mediana de fibra alimentaria 2,9 g/100 g (RI: 2,27-3,42). El 75,5% mostraron publicidad de reclamo. Las galletas dirigidas al público infantil contenían azúcar añadido en mayor porcentaje (98,1 frente a 88,6%; p = 0,033), menos fibra (mediana 2,9 g/100 g frente a 3,5 g/100 g; p = 0,005), aceite de oliva/GAO en mayor porcentaje (67,9 frente a 36,7%; p <0,001) y más publicidad de reclamo (75,5 frente a 45,5%; p <0,001). CONCLUSIONES: las galletas dirigidas al público infantil contienen azúcar añadido, elevado contenido calórico, grasas saturadas en más del 37% y publicidad de reclamo en elevado porcentaje. Por otro lado, se observa el uso de grasas monoinsaturadas en más del 50%. La información de este estudio podría facilitar intervenciones de salud pública e incentivar a los fabricantes para reformular sus productos


INTRODUCTION: the consumption of biscuits is high in the Spanish paediatric population. Biscuits are ultra-processed products with a high energy content and energy density and generally contain added sugars and unhealthy fats. METHODS: we conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study on the characteristics and nutritional composition of biscuits available in Spanish supermarkets, and compared biscuits marketed to children to all other biscuits. RESULTS: we analysed a sample of 350 biscuits. The mean energy content was 471.86 ± 35.83 kcal/100 g. Saturated fats were used in 53.1%, palm oil in 47.1% and added sugars in 90% (median content, 25 g/100 g; IQR: 20-33). The median dietary fibre content was 3.2 g/100 g (IQR: 2.4-5.2). The packaging of 86 advertised that the product contained fibre, specifying the total fibre content in 95.34% of cases, with a median value of 5.45 g/100 g (IQR: 4-7.9). Of the total products, 53 (15.1%) were marketed to children, and their mean energy content was 466.47 ± 19.31 kcal/100 g. The main fat was olive oil or high oleic sunflower oil (HOSO) in 67.9%, and palm oil was present in 20 (37.7%). There were added sugars in 98.1% (mean sugar content, 25.88 ± 6.82 g/100 g). The median dietary fibre content was 2.9 g/100 g (IQR 2.27-3.42). The packaging of 75.5% featured some form of advertising. The comparative analysis showed that a greater percentage of biscuits specifically marketed to children had added sugars (98.1% vs 88.6%, p = 0.033) and that these biscuits had a lower fibre content (median, 2.9 g/100 g vs. 3.5 g/100 g, p = 0.005), that a greater percentage contained olive oil or HOSO (67.9% vs 36.7%, p <0.001), and a greater percentage featured promotional advertising in their packaging (75.5% vs 45.5%, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: biscuits marketed to the paediatric population had added sugars and a high energy content; more than 37% had saturated fats and a high proportion featured advertising in the packaging. On the other hand, we found that monounsaturated fats were used in more than 50% of these products. The findings of this study could serve as reference to guide the development of public health interventions or product reformulation by manufacturers


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Food Composition , Food Analysis/methods , Cookies , Pediatric Obesity/epidemiology , Food, Fortified/analysis , Food Quality , Cross-Sectional Studies , Food Labeling/classification
5.
Pediatr. aten. prim ; 22(86): e65-e80, abr.-jun. 2020.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-198539

ABSTRACT

Es indudable que los niños y adolescentes requieren protección frente a las prácticas dañosas. Los menores son vulnerables al marketing depredador e inherentemente explotador que se produce en un contexto de incumplimiento masivo de las normas. Aunque los progenitores no tienen conocimientos nutricionales o sanitarios suficientes, valoran en gran medida la salud de los niños y cambian sus hábitos de compra cuando el etiquetado les revela con claridad los elementos malsanos de un producto. Sin embargo, la libertad de los progenitores de rechazar la oferta de alimentos malsanos no es un mecanismo de protección eficaz, porque el mensaje publicitario de alimentos malsanos es normalmente engañoso. En lo jurídico, situar el debate en el plano de la libertad es falsearlo. Con carácter previo al momento de la elección, se ha producido una infracción del derecho a la libertad de empresa o a la libertad de expresión mercantil, dado que solo amparan la realización de publicidad leal, veraz y lícita. Se debe, por tanto, resolver la situación de ilegalidad en la que se ha instalado la publicidad de alimentos malsanos, por la infracción continuada del artículo 4 del Reglamento 1924/2006 y los masivos incumplimientos del código de autorregulación, en fraude de la Ley de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición. También se debe limitar la incitación, sugerencia o invitación a realizar actividades nocivas cuando dicho carácter sea falseado con sugerencias que, en otros ámbitos de la presentación alimentaria, los Tribunales entienden suficientes para producir riesgo de confusión


It is unquestionable that children require protection against harmful practices. Minors are vulnerable to predatory and inherently exploitative marketing that occurs in a context of massive breach of the rules. Although parents do not have sufficient nutritional or health knowledge, they greatly value children's health and change their buying habits when labeling clearly reveals the unhealthy elements of a product. The freedom of parents to refuse unhealthy foods is not an effective protection mechanism because the advertising message of unhealthy foods is usually misleading. Legally, placing the debate on the level of freedom is to falsify it because, prior to the moment of the election, there has been an infringement of the right to entrepreneurial freedom or to freedom of commercial speech, which only covers the realization of loyal, truthful and lawful advertising. Therefore, the situation of illegality in which advertising of unhealthy food has been installed must be removed: a continued violation of Article 4 of Regulation 1924/2006 and massive breaches of self-regulation code in fraud of the Spanish Nutrition Act. It should also limit the incitement, suggestion or invitation to carry out harmful activities when said character is falsified with suggestions that in other areas of the food presentation the Courts understand sufficient to produce a risk of confusion


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Food Publicity , Parenting/trends , Pediatric Obesity/prevention & control , Food and Nutritional Health Promotion/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Quality , Food Labeling/classification , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
6.
Salud Publica Mex ; 61(5): 609-618, 2019.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31661738

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare consumers' objec- tive understanding of five FoPLs [Health Star Rating system (HSR), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes (RIs), Warning Symbol] in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1 001 Mexican consumers were recruited and asked to rank three sets of label-free products according to their nutritional quality, via a survey. Upon completion of this task, participants were randomized to one of five FoPL condi- tions and were again asked to rank the same sets of products, this time with a FoPL displayed on pack. Change in ability to correctly rank products across the two tasks was assessed by FoPL using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Nutri-Score and MTL performed best, followed Warning Symbol, HSR and RIs. CONCLUSIONS: Nutri-Score and MTL appear as efficient schemes to inform consumers on the nutritional quality of foods, in particular in Mexico, where it would be a helpful tool for consumers in purchasing situations.


OBJETIVO: Evaluar la comprensión objetiva de cinco tipos de etiquetados frontales de paquetes (EFP) (Sistema de Clasifi- cación de Estrellas de Salud, Semáforo Múltiple, Nutri-Score, Ingestas de Referencia y Símbolo de Advertencia) en México. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se reclutaron 1 001 consumidores mexicanos para clasificar tres productos de tres categorías de alimentos sin EFP, según su calidad nutricional. Se les asignó al azar uno de los cinco EFP para clasificar los mismos productos, esta vez con un EFP en el empaque. El cambio en la capacidad para clasificar correctamente los productos en las dos tareas fue evaluado por EFP, utilizando un modelo de regresión logística ordinal. RESULTADOS: Nutri-Score y Semáforo Múltiple obtuvieron un mejor desempeño, seguidos del Símbolo de Advertencia, Sistema de Clasificación de Estrellas de Salud e Ingestas de Referencia. CONCLUSIONES: Nutri-Score y el Semáforo Múltiple surgen como esquemas eficientes para informar a los consumidores sobre la calidad nutricional de los alimentos en México, donde podrían ser una herramienta útil para los consumidores en situación de compra.


Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Food Labeling/methods , Food/classification , Nutritive Value , Adult , Female , Food Labeling/classification , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Nutritional Requirements , Random Allocation , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
7.
Salud pública Méx ; 61(5): 609-618, sep.-oct. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1127324

ABSTRACT

Resumen: Objetivo: Evaluar la comprensión objetiva de cinco tipos de etiquetados frontales de paquetes (EFP) (Sistema de Clasificación de Estrellas de Salud, Semáforo Múltiple, Nutri-Score, Ingestas de Referencia y Símbolo de Advertencia) en México. Material y métodos: Se reclutaron 1 001 consumidores mexicanos para clasificar tres productos de tres categorías de alimentos sin EFP, según su calidad nutricional. Se les asignó al azar uno de los cinco EFP para clasificar los mismos productos, esta vez con un EFP en el empaque. El cambio en la capacidad para clasificar correctamente los productos en las dos tareas fue evaluado por EFP, utilizando un modelo de regresión logística ordinal. Resultados: Nutri-Score y Semáforo Múltiple obtuvieron un mejor desempeño, seguidos del Símbolo de Advertencia, Sistema de Clasificación de Estrellas de Salud e Ingestas de Referencia. Conclusión: Nutri-Score y el Semáforo Múltiple surgen como esquemas eficientes para informar a los consumidores sobre la calidad nutricional de los alimentos en México, donde podrían ser una herramienta útil para los consumidores en situación de compra.


Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to compare consumers' objective understanding of five FoPLs [Health Star Rating system (HSR), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes (RIs), Warning Symbol] in Mexico. Materials and methods: 1 001 Mexican consumers were recruited and asked to rank three sets of label-free products according to their nutritional quality, via a survey. Upon completion of this task, participants were randomized to one of five FoPL conditions and were again asked to rank the same sets of products, this time with a FoPL displayed on pack. Change in ability to correctly rank products across the two tasks was assessed by FoPL using ordinal logistic regression. Results: Nutri-Score and MTL performed best, followed Warning Symbol, HSR and RIs. Conclusion: Nutri-Score and MTL appear as efficient schemes to inform consumers on the nutritional quality of foods, in particular in Mexico, where it would be a helpful tool for consumers in purchasing situations.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Consumer Behavior , Food Labeling/methods , Nutritive Value , Socioeconomic Factors , Random Allocation , Logistic Models , Food/classification , Food Labeling/classification , Mexico , Nutritional Requirements
8.
Nutrients ; 10(6)2018 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29880737

ABSTRACT

Nutrient profiling systems (NPS) are used around the world. In some countries, the food industry participates in the design of these systems. We aimed to compare the ability of various NPS to identify processed and ultra-processed Mexican products containing excessive amounts of critical nutrients. A sample of 2544 foods and beverages available in the Mexican market were classified as compliant and non-compliant according to seven NPS: the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) model, which served as our reference, the Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion (NPSC), the Mexican Committee of Nutrition Experts (MCNE), the Health Star Rating (HSR), the Mexican Nutritional Seal (MNS), the Chilean Warning Octagons (CWO) 2016, 2018 and 2019 criteria, and Ecuador's Multiple Traffic Light (MTL). Overall, the proportion of foods classified as compliant by the HSR, MTL and MCNE models was similar to the PAHO model. In contrast, the NPSC, the MNS and the CWO-2016 classified a higher amount of foods as compliant. Larger differences between NPS classification were observed across food categories. Results support the notion that models developed with the involvement of food manufacturers are more permissive than those based on scientific evidence. Results highlight the importance of thoroughly evaluating the underlying criteria of a model.


Subject(s)
Fast Foods/analysis , Food Analysis/methods , Food Handling , Food Labeling , Food , Nutritive Value , Fast Foods/adverse effects , Fast Foods/classification , Food/classification , Food Labeling/classification , Humans , Mexico , Reproducibility of Results
9.
Food Res Int ; 108: 440-454, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735078

ABSTRACT

The present paper focuses on the problems that arise in food classification systems (FCSs), especially when the food product type has different levels or grades of quality. Despite the principal function of these systems being to assist the consumer (to inform, clarify and facilitate choice and purchase), they frequently have the opposite effect. Thus, the main aim of the present research involves providing orientations for the design of effective food classification systems. To address this objective, considering the context of food product consumption (related to heuristic processing), we conducted an experimental study with 720 participants. We analysed the usefulness of heuristic elements by a factorial 2 (category length: short and long) × 3 (visual signs: colours, numbers and images) design in relation to recall and recognition activities. The results showed that the elements used to make the classification more effective for consumers vary depending on whether the user seeks to prioritize the recall or the recognition of product categories. Thus, long categories with images significantly improve recognition, and short categories with colours improve recall. A series of recommendations are provided that can help to enhance FCSs and to make them more intuitive and easier to understand for consumers. Implications with regard to theory and practice are discussed.


Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Food Labeling/classification , Food Quality , Heuristics , Terminology as Topic , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Recall , Middle Aged , Photic Stimulation , Recognition, Psychology , Visual Perception , Young Adult
10.
Food Res Int ; 108: 455-464, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735079

ABSTRACT

Food allergen labelling is mandatory and regulated whilst precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) remains voluntary in most countries. It is the aim of this study to identify the food allergens declared in food products sold in a developing country and to what extent food allergens and PAL are emphasised in the products. A total of 505 food and beverages (snacks, baked goods, confectionary, baby food, condiments & jams, beverages, powder & paste, instant food, chilled & frozen food and canned food) were evaluated in Malaysia. Soybean represents the largest group of food allergen declared in labels, followed by wheat and milk products. Thirteen variations of contains statement were found with "Contains [allergen(s)]" being the most common (55.02%). There were 22 different types of "may contain" statements with 'May contain traces of [allergen(s)]' being the most common advice labelling used (55.41%). Different font type or emphasis such as brackets (51.57%) and bold font (33.86%) were used to inform consumers about presence of allergens. The national regulations on food allergen labelling are then critically contrasted with other Asian countries and the EU Regulation No. 1169/2011, which represents one of the most stringent food regulations in the world. Improving current allergen labelling limitations and practices would be of great benefit to consumers to prevent risk of food hypersensitivity.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Food Labeling/methods , Food Safety/methods , Terminology as Topic , Consumer Product Safety , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Food Labeling/classification , Humans , Malaysia , Protective Factors , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
11.
Rev. Nutr. (Online) ; 30(5): 663-677, Sept.-Oct. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1041211

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The sugars added to foods have been featured in recent scientific research, including the publication of the World Health Organization recommendation to limit consumption of added sugars, based on studies on weight gain and dental caries. However, it is possible that there is evidence of an association between excessive consumption and other pathologies, but scientific studies have yet to investigate these associations. Moreover, there is no consensus on the descriptions and definitions of these sugars, with several terms and components used to designate them. In Brazil, there are few studies investigating added sugars, identifying a lack of discussion on this subject. This paper presents a literature review of sugars added to foods, from their definitions and classifications to the metabolism and health effects. The search was performed without limiting dates in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and SciELO, as well as in national and international official sites. Keywords in Portuguese and English related to sugars added to foods were used, in combination with terms related to systematic review and meta-analysis studies, in order to find research linking added sugars consumption with health damage. The literature indicates that there is a relationship between excessive consumption of added sugars and various health outcomes, including weight gain, type 2 diabetes Mellitus, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. The different descriptions of sugars in foods may confuse both food consumers and researchers, since each term includes different components. Thus, it is suggested to use the standardized term "added sugar" as the most suitable term for the broader population to understand, because it indicates that those sugars are not natural food components.


RESUMO Os açúcares adicionados aos alimentos estão em destaque em pesquisas científicas recentes, inclusive em decorrência da publicação da Organização Mundial da Saúde com recomendações de limitação do seu consumo, baseando-se em estudos sobre ganho de peso e cárie dental. Entretanto, é possível que haja evidências de associação do consumo excessivo com outras patologias, mas não foram encontrados estudos que as reúnam. Além disso, ainda não há consenso científico quanto às denominações e definições desses açúcares. No Brasil, há poucos estudos que investigaram os açúcares de adição, identificando-se escassez de discussão a respeito. Diante disso, este artigo apresenta uma revisão de literatura sobre os açúcares adicionados aos alimentos, desde suas definições e classificações até o metabolismo e efeitos à saúde. A busca de informações foi realizada nos bancos de dados: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed e SciELO, bem como em sites de órgãos oficiais nacionais e internacionais. Foram utilizados unitermos em português e inglês relacionados aos açúcares de adição e a estudos de revisão sistemática e metanálise, para identificação de pesquisas que associam seu consumo a prejuízos à saúde. A literatura aponta relação do consumo excessivo desses açúcares a diversos desfechos em saúde, incluindo ganho de peso, diabetes mellitus tipo 2, câncer e doenças cardiovasculares. As diferentes denominações dos açúcares nos alimentos podem confundir tanto os consumidores quanto os pesquisadores, uma vez que cada termo traz a inserção de componentes distintos. Assim, sugere-se padronização no uso do termo açúcares de adição, que parece ser o mais adequado para o entendimento da população, uma vez que indica que aquele açúcar não é natural do alimento.


Subject(s)
Dietary Sugars , Eating , Chronic Disease , Sugars , Food Labeling/classification
13.
Rev. esp. nutr. comunitaria ; 21(2): 34-42, abr.-jun. 2015. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-163586

ABSTRACT

Debido a la creciente oferta, variedad y globalización en el comercio de los alimentos, las políticas de salud y gobierno en conjunto con las industrias de alimentos y asociaciones no gubernamentales, han enfocado sus esfuerzos, entre otras acciones, al desarrollo, aplicación y revisión de sistemas de información (orientación nutricional) a los consumidores. Un caso específico es el etiquetado frontal de los alimentos, el cual tiene por objetivo principal proveer al consumidor con información rápida, simplificada y comprensible del perfil nutricional de los alimentos generando más herramientas en la toma de decisiones sobre el consumo de los mismos. Es así que una gran diversidad de sistemas de etiquetado frontal han sido propuestos bajo diferentes métodos de evaluación, valores de referencia, intención de uso y finalidad, haciendo que su aplicación por los productores de alimentos, aceptación por los consumidores y armonización entre los diferentes países se vea obstaculizada y hasta cierto punto cuestionada. En este artículo se presenta un análisis de tres casos diferentes de sistemas de etiquetado frontal (GDAs, Semáforo nutricional, Choices) en cuanto a sus ventajas y desventajas así como a su cumplimiento con ciertas características fundamentales para su exitosa aplicación en la comercialización de alimentos (AU)


Due to the increasing offer, variety and globalization in food trade, government and health ministry in conjunction with the food industry and non-governmental organizations have focused their efforts on the development, implementation and review of nutritional information systems for the consumers. A specific case is the front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labelling, which mainly aims to provide consumers with fast, simplified and understandable information about the nutritional profile of foods and beverages generating more tools to make a healthy choice at the point of sale and consumption. Since then a wide variety of FOP systems have been proposed using different nutrition rating methods, nutrients reference values and ultimate purpose, making its implementation by food producers, consumer’s acceptance and harmonization between countries hindered and to some extent questioned. In this paper, an analysis of three different cases of FOP systems (GDAs, UK traffic-light, Choices) regarding its advantages and disadvantages as well as compliance with certain fundamental characteristics for successful application in food marketing, is presented (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Food and Nutrition Education , Nutritional Facts , Food Labeling/classification , Food Labeling/methods , Product Labeling/standards , Diet, Food, and Nutrition , 51402 , Information Systems/trends , 25783/methods , Nutrients/methods , Public Health , Obesity/diet therapy
14.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 10(6): e219-e223, 2015 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28531466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Changes in the EU regulation on food for specific groups (FSG) [1] and within the German social law [2] combined with various definitions in the legal and the scientific background led to the need for development of a categorization system for "Food for special medical purposes" (FSMP) for enteral use [3]. METHODS: The system was developed by an interdisciplinary working group of two German industry associations, which represent the leading manufacturers and distributors of FSMP in Europe. It aims to minimize the misunderstandings surrounding the different definitions used in relation to enteral nutritional products and incorporate the latest scientific knowledge and medical guidelines [4]. RESULTS: The new proposal consists of a table which shows the product categories and briefly the definitions of the used terms. The text contains the relevant definitions of terms often used within the field of enteral nutrition. CONCLUSION: This provides health care professionals with support and the decision making process for the prescription and use of such products. Additionally it also benefits the responsible authorities to formulate new directives, which are user-friendly and reflect the latest knowledge in medical nutrition.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition/classification , Food Labeling/classification , Food, Formulated/classification , Legislation, Food , Terminology as Topic , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Food Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Humans
15.
Nutrire Rev. Soc. Bras. Aliment. Nutr ; 39(3): 327-337, dec 2014. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-737292

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate the habit of reading the nutrition labeling of foods and to identify the perceptions that can make the understanding of its information more difficult. Method: A qualitative, exploratory research was carried out with focal groups of discussion: consumers, health professionals, and government and food industry technicians. Two open questions motivated the discussions. The content was recorded,transcribed, analyzed, categorized and, when possible, treated with the Collective Subject Discourse technique. Results: The habit of reading the labels was present in all groups. However, the non-reading habit was also identified in the discourse of the groups of consumers and health professionals. Factors that can cause difficulty in understanding the labels, according to the participants, are graphic presentation, content complexity, lack of general education on nutrition, and socioeconomic factors.Conclusion: The primary hypothesis of this study was confirmed: information on food labels is not understood by consumers. The study indicated that the use of this information can be hindered due to its content complexity, as well as to the lack of visual attraction and easiness of reading. The content was considered complex and difficult even by health professionals and government and industry technicians. All groups show the perception that the population lacks basic education in nutrition.


Objetivos: Investigar o hábito de leitura e a compreensão da rotulagem nutricional obrigatória dos alimentos, assim como identificar as percepções sobre o que dificulta o uso das informações. Métodos: Realizou-se uma pesquisa qualitativa, exploratória, com os seguintes grupos focais de discussão: consumidores, profissionais da saúde e técnicos do governo e da indústria alimentícia. Aplicaram-se duas questões abertas e o conteúdo das declarações foi gravado, transcrito, analisado, categorizado e tratado, quando possível, com a técnica do Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo. Resultados: Identificou-se hábito de leitura da tabela nutricional em todos os grupos. A não leitura foi capturada nos discursos de participantes dos grupos de consumidores e de profissionais de saúde. Os fatores identificados pelos participantes como dificultadores da compreensão dos rótulos são: a forma de apresentação, a complexidade do conteúdo, a falta de educação geral sobre nutrição e alguns fatores socioeconômicos.Conclusões: A presente pesquisa confirmou a hipótese inicial de que as informações nutricionais obrigatórias veiculadas nos rótulos dos alimentos não são bem compreendidas pelos consumidores. O estudo revelou que os principais fatores dificultadores da utilização das informações nutricionais são a forma inadequada de apresentação dos rótulos, com visual pouco atrativo e difícil de ler, e o conteúdo, considerado complexo e de difícil compreensão por todos os participantes, inclusive pelos profissionais de saúde e técnicos do governo e da indústria. Todos os grupos percebem que há falta de educação em geral da população sobre nutrição.


Subject(s)
Food Labeling/classification , Nutritional Facts , Food and Nutrition Education , Nutritional Sciences
16.
Nutrire Rev. Soc. Bras. Aliment. Nutr ; 38(2): 156-171, ago. 2013. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-694535

ABSTRACT

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the consumption of diet and lightproducts, check whether consumers are consuming these products correctly, and if there is understanding in relation to food labels. A sectional study was carried out at a supermarket in the municipality of Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul state. Data were collected between March and April 2011 from a sample size of 150 consumers. We applied a questionnaire to identify the objective knowledge and understanding of diet and light products and food labels. Consumers responded to the questionnaire in the same supermarket where they were invited to participate in the survey with an average time of 15 minutes. We observed that the population consumes more light products (40.7%) than diet products (24.7%), and that 38.7% responded correctly to the light concept and 56% responded wrongly to the diet concept. There is also a lack of understanding regarding the knowledge of these products. Concerning theunderstanding of food labels, the population showed partial knowledgeand considered that the nutritional information provided is not clear.


El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el consumo de productos diet y light, comprobar si se consumen esos productos correctamente, y si los rótulosalimentarios son adecuadamente comprendidos. El estudio transversal se llevó a cabo en un supermercado en Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Los datos fueron recolectados entre marzo y abril de 2011, y el tamaño de la muestra fue de 150 consumidores. Se aplicó un cuestionario con preguntas objetivas destinadas a identificar el conocimiento y la comprensión de los productos diet y light y de los rótulos de los envases. Los consumidores respondieron al cuestionario en el mismo supermercado donde fueron invitados a participar en la encuesta, con un tiempo promedio de 15 minutos. Se observó que la población consume más productos light(40,7%) que diet (24,7%), y que el 38,7% de los encuestados respondió correctamente al concepto ?light?; con respecto al concepto ?diet?, 56%respondió inadecuadamente. Se constató también una falta de conocimiento sobre la naturaleza de esos productos. En relación a la comprensión de las etiquetas de los alimentos, la población mostrótener un conocimiento parcial, y consideró que la información nutricional proporcionada no es clara.


O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o consumo dos produtos diet e light, além de verificar se os consumidores estão consumindo de forma corretaesses produtos e se há entendimento em relação aos rótulos alimentares. Foi realizado estudo transversal em um supermercado de Caxias do Sul-RS. Os dados foram coletados entre março e abril de 2011, e o tamanho da amostra foi de 150 consumidores. Aplicou-se um questionário com questões objetivas para identificar o conhecimento e o entendimento dos produtos diet e light, e dos rótulos alimentares. Os consumidores responderam ao questionário no próprio supermercado, onde foram convidados a participar da pesquisa, com tempo médio de 15 minutos. Foi possível observar que a população consome mais produtos light (40,7%) do que diet (24,7%), e que 38,7% dos pesquisados responderamcorretamente o conceito light; quanto ao conceito diet, 56% responderam de forma errada. Observou-se também a falta de entendimento em relação ao conhecimento desses produtos. Quanto à compreensão dos rótulos alimentares, a população mostrou ter conhecimento parcial e os entrevistados consideram que as informações nutricionais apresentadas não são claras.


Subject(s)
Eating , Food Labeling/classification , Knowledge , Diet/classification , Nutritional Facts
17.
Appetite ; 59(3): 806-17, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22918174

ABSTRACT

Significant ongoing debate exists amongst stakeholders as to the best front-of-pack labelling approach and emerging evidence suggests that the plethora of schemes may cause confusion for the consumer. To gain a better understanding of the relevant psychological phenomena and consumer perspectives surrounding FoP labelling schemes and their optimal development a Multiple Sort Procedure study involving free sorting of a range of nutritional labels presented on cards was performed in four countries (n=60). The underlying structure of the qualitative data generated was explored using Multiple Scalogram Analysis. Elicitation of categorisations from consumers has the potential to provide a very important perspective in this arena and results demonstrated that the amount of information contained within a nutrition label has high salience for consumers, as does the health utility of the label although a dichotomy exists in the affective evaluation of the labels containing varying degrees of information aggregation. Classification of exiting front-of-pack labelling systems on a proposed dimension of 'directiveness' leads to a better understanding of why some schemes may be more effective than others in particular situations or for particular consumers. Based on this research an enhanced hypothetical front-of-pack labelling scheme which combines both directive and non-directive elements is proposed.


Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Decision Making , Diet , Food Labeling/classification , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Policy , Nutritive Value , Young Adult
18.
Psychol Rep ; 109(1): 187-207, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22049661

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research is to improve understanding of the consistency of the categorization process in cognitive psychology. To investigate the temporal stability of the categorization process between and within subjects, 100 participants (M = 22.1 yr., SD = 2.1) were required to sort 65 food labels into groups and to explain their grouping. The sorting and property generation of food labels were compared by conducting two sessions (with a 15-day interval) to assess within-subject variability. Two groups of participants were compared to assess between-subjects variability. The results from the sorting task showed excellent stability between and within subjects. Conversely, the property generation task showed high variability. It is concluded that the tasks involved different types of knowledge. The sorting task appeared to generate good agreement and to involve more stable knowledge. The task of producing properties may involve other mechanisms. This paper discusses the results in light of cognitive and pragmatic theories.


Subject(s)
Association Learning , Cognition , Food Labeling/classification , Food/classification , Individuality , Adult , Discrimination, Psychological , Female , Humans , Young Adult
20.
Acta pediatr. esp ; 66(1): 27-31, ene. 2008. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-64835

ABSTRACT

La entrada en vigor de la nueva normativa sobre alimentos funcionales sólo permitirá incluir alegaciones que hagan referencia a efectos beneficiosos sobre la salud demostrados científicamente. Los probióticos constituyen una importante categoría dentro de los alimentos funcionales, contemplada en el marco de esta regulación. La posible introducción denuevas cepas prebióticas, así como su uso en sectores distintos al de la alimentación, hace, no obstante, que las normas que rigen su comercialización requieran consideraciones adicionales, como la normativa de los nuevos alimentos. En el marco de la FAO/OMS en 2002 un grupo de expertos en probióticos ha trabajado en la definición de: a) el grado de evidencia científica necesario para poder incluir alegaciones de saluden los alimentos que contienen probióticos; b) las medidas necesarias para su regulación y etiquetado, y c) los criterios para evaluar su eficacia y seguridad. Aunque todavía no existe un consenso internacional sobre todos estos aspectos, sus recomendaciones se han transferido a la Comisión del Codex Alimentarius para su consideración en el marco que regula tantolos alimentos funcionales como los nuevos alimentos. En el contexto de los probióticos, la nueva normativa sobre alimentos funcionales destaca la necesidad de evaluar las relaciones dosis-efecto y definir de forma específica las propiedades beneficiosas, la población diana de cada probiótico y los aspectos relativos a su seguridad, hasta ahora sólo regulados en probióticos para alimentación animal. La estandarización de los criterios de evaluación de la funcionalidad y la seguridad de los prebióticos, así como el establecimiento de correlaciones entre los ensayos de evaluación in vivo e in vitro, siguen constituyendo un gran reto para la comunidad científica, los productores y los órganos reguladores. Globalmente, las medidas adoptadas van a contribuir a armonizar los criterios de comercialización de los alimentos funcionales (y, entre ellos, los que contienen probióticos) y a proteger los derechos de los consumidores mediante la transmisión de las alegaciones de salud en un formato normalizado (AU)


The coming into effect of the new regulation on functional foods will only allow the introduction of nutritional and health claims that are scientifically substantiated. Probiotics are an important category of functional foods that are taken into consideration in this regulation. However, the possible introduction of new probiotic strains, as well as their use in sectors other than the food industry, makes it necessary to establish additional considerations, such as the regulation of novel foods. In 2002, within the framework of the FAO/WHO, an expert consultation group worked to define (I) the amount of scientific evidence necessary to make health claims concerning probiotic foods, (II) the means necessary for their regulation and labeling, and (III) the criteria for the evaluation of their efficacy and safety. Although, as yet, there is no international consensus on these aspects, the recommendations of this consultation group have been transferred to the Codex Alimentarius Commission for their consideration within the framework of the regulations of both functional foods and novel foods. In the context of probiotics, as part of the functional foods, the new regulation points out the need to define the dose-effect relationships, the specific beneficial effect of each probiotic, the target population, and the safety issues, to date, only regulated in probiotics for animal feed. The standardization of the criteria for evaluating the efficacy and safety of probiotics, as well as the establishment of solid correlations between in vitro and in vivo trials, constitute challenges for the scientific community, the producers and the regulatory authorities. Overall, the regulations adopted will contribute to the harmonization of the criteria for commercialization of functional foods and those containing probiotics and to the protection of consumers’ rights by communicating the health claims in a normalized format (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Infant Nutrition/physiology , Food , Food Labeling/classification , Food Labeling/standards , Infant Food/analysis , Infant Food , Probiotics/pharmacokinetics , Probiotics/supply & distribution , Probiotics/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...