ABSTRACT
METHODS: Sensory neuronopathies (SN) are a group of peripheral nerve disorders characterized by multifocal non-length-dependent sensory deficits and sensory ataxia. Its recognition is essential not only for proper management but also to guide the etiological investigation. The uncommon SN clinical picture and its rarity set the conditions for the misdiagnosis and the diagnostic delay, especially in non-paraneoplastic SN. Therefore, our objectives were to characterize the diagnostic odyssey for non-paraneoplastic SN patients, as well as to identify possible associated factors. We consecutively enrolled 48 non-paraneoplastic SN patients followed in a tertiary neuromuscular clinic at the University of Campinas (Brazil). All patients were instructed to retrieve their previous medical records, and we collected the data regarding demographics, disease onset, previous incorrect diagnoses made and the recommended treatments. RESULTS: There were 34 women, with a mean age at the diagnosis of 45.9 ± 12.2 years, and 28/48 (58%) of the patients were idiopathic. Negative sensory symptoms were the heralding symptoms in 25/48 (52%); these were asymmetric in 36/48 (75%) and followed a chronic course in 35/48 (73%). On average, it took 5.4 ± 5.3 years for SN to be diagnosed; patients had an average of 3.4 ± 1.5 incorrect diagnoses. A disease onset before the age of 40 was associated to shorter diagnosis delay (3.7 ± 3.4 vs. 7.8 ± 6.7 years, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis are frequent in non-paraneoplastic SN patients. As in other rare conditions, increased awareness in all the healthcare system levels is paramount to ensure accurate diagnosis and to improve care of these patients.
Subject(s)
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Brazil , Delayed Diagnosis , Diagnostic Errors/classification , Female , Gait Ataxia/etiology , Ganglia, Sensory/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/complicationsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Sensory neuronopathies (SN) are a group of peripheral nerve disorders characterized by multifocal non-length-dependent sensory deficits and sensory ataxia. Its recognition is essential not only for proper management but also to guide the etiological investigation. The uncommon SN clinical picture and its rarity set the conditions for the misdiagnosis and the diagnostic delay, especially in non-paraneoplastic SN. Therefore, our objectives were to characterize the diagnostic odyssey for non-paraneoplastic SN patients, as well as to identify possible associated factors. Methods We consecutively enrolled 48 non-paraneoplastic SN patients followed in a tertiary neuromuscular clinic at the University of Campinas (Brazil). All patients were instructed to retrieve their previous medical records, and we collected the data regarding demographics, disease onset, previous incorrect diagnoses made and the recommended treatments. Results There were 34 women, with a mean age at the diagnosis of 45.9 ± 12.2 years, and 28/48 (58%) of the patients were idiopathic. Negative sensory symptoms were the heralding symptoms in 25/48 (52%); these were asymmetric in 36/48 (75%) and followed a chronic course in 35/48 (73%). On average, it took 5.4 ± 5.3 years for SN to be diagnosed; patients had an average of 3.4 ± 1.5 incorrect diagnoses. A disease onset before the age of 40 was associated to shorter diagnosis delay (3.7 ± 3.4 vs. 7.8 ± 6.7 years, p = 0.01). Conclusions These results suggest that diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis are frequent in non-paraneoplastic SN patients. As in other rare conditions, increased awareness in all the healthcare system levels is paramount to ensure accurate diagnosis and to improve care of these patients.
RESUMO As neuronopatias sensitivas (NS) representam um grupo de doenças caracterizadas por ataxia sensitiva e déficits sensitivos multifocais e não-comprimento dependentes. O seu reconhecimento é fundamental para o tratamento apropriado e para a investigação de doenças associadas. O quadro clínico pouco frequente aliado à baixa prevalência, especialmente das formas não-paraneoplásicas (NSnp), colaboram para o atraso e erro no diagnóstico. Os objetivos desse trabalho são descrever a odisseia diagnóstica dos pacientes com NSnp e tentar identificar possíveis fatores associados. Métodos Foram incluídos consecutivamente 48 pacientes com NSnp acompanhados no ambulatório de doenças neuromusculares da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Brasil). Dados demográficos e sobre o início da NS (incluindo diagnósticos que lhes foram dados e tratamentos prescritos) foram coletados. Resultados Na coorte descrita havia 34 mulheres e a idade ao diagnóstico era de 45,9 ± 12,2 anos. Os sintomas inaugurais eram sensitivos deficitários em 25/48 (52%) dos pacientes, sendo assimétricos em 36/48 (75%) e de evolução crônica em 35/48 (73%). Para 28/48 (58%) dos pacientes a NS era idiopática. Em média, os pacientes com NSnp tiveram um atraso diagnóstico de 5,4 ± 5,3 anos com uma média de 3,4 ± 1,5 diagnósticos incorretos. Pacientes com início antes dos 40 anos tiveram diagnóstico mais precoce que aqueles com início tardio (3,7 ± 3,4 vs. 7,8 ± 6,7 anos, p = 0,01). Conclusão Os dados ora apresentados sugerem que o erro e o atraso diagnóstico são frequentes e impactam os pacientes com NS. A importância do diagnóstico das NS deve ser constante em todos os níveis do sistema de saúde para o diagnóstico correto e a consequente melhora no cuidado a esses pacientes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Brazil , Ganglia, Sensory/physiopathology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/complications , Gait Ataxia/etiology , Diagnostic Errors/classification , Delayed DiagnosisABSTRACT
NaCN is a classical stimulus used to elicit discharges from carotid body chemoreceptors. The effect is assumed to be mediated by glomus (type I) cells, which release an excitatory transmitter for the excitation of carotid nerve endings. Since the sensory perikarya of the glossopharyngeal nerve (from which the carotid nerve branches) are located in the petrosal ganglion, we tested whether application of this drug to the petrosal ganglion superfused in vitro elicits antidromic discharges in the carotid nerve. NaCN did indeed cause an intense and prolonged burst of nerve impulses in the carotid nerve, while provoking a less intense and much briefer burst of discharges in the glossopharyngeal branch. Carotid nerve responses to NaCN were reduced and shortened by prior or following application of dopamine to the ganglion. Sodium azide applied to the petrosal ganglion evoked a less intense and much briefer burst of impulses in the carotid nerve. Ganglionar application of 2,4-dinitrophenol did not induce discharges in the carotid nerve. Switching the superfusion of the ganglion from a normoxic to a hypoxic solution did not evoke discharges in the carotid nerve. Therefore, the perikarya of carotid nerve neurons are sensitive to NaCN, but are not excited by reducing the pO(2) of the superfusing solution.