Impact of study design and statistical model in pharmacogenetic studies with gene-treatment interaction.

Gene-treatment interactions, just like drug-drug interactions, can have dramatic effects on a patient response and therefore influence the clinician decision at the patient's bedside. Crossover designs, although they are known to decrease the number of subjects in drug-interaction studies, are seldom used in pharmacogenetic studies. We propose to evaluate, via realistic clinical trial simulations, to what extent crossover designs can help quantifying the gene-treatment interaction effect. We explored different scenarios of crossover and parallel design studies comparing two symptom-modifying treatments in a chronic and stable disease accounting for the impact of a one gene and one gene-treatment interaction. We varied the number of subjects, the between and within subject variabilities, the gene polymorphism frequency and the effect sizes of the treatment, gene, and gene-treatment interaction. Each simulated dataset was analyzed using three models: (i) estimating only the treatment effect, (ii) estimating the treatment and the gene effects, and (iii) estimating the treatment, the gene, and the gene-treatment interaction effects. We showed how ignoring the gene-treatment interaction results in the wrong treatment effect estimates. We also highlighted how crossover studies are more powerful to detect a treatment effect in the presence of a gene-treatment interaction and more often lead to correct treatment attribution.

Human gene therapy: A scientometric analysis.

To provide a clear landscape, trends, and research frontiers of gene therapy, we systematically retrieved a total of 62,961 peer-viewed studies published between 1996 and 2020 from the Scopus, Web of Science, and 42,120 Inpadoc patent families from Derwent Innovation databases. Multiple bibliometric approaches suggest that gene therapy began to recover in 2013 after a period of significant decline. However, metrics in terms of authors and scholarly output growth, FWCI, annual citations, percentage of high-impact journal literature, and patent-citations per scholarly output are still weak at this stage, indicating a lack of research momentum. We also visualized gene therapy's knowledge structure by employing citation analysis, co-citation analysis, and co-word analysis, revealing its research hotspots and trends by text mining with Natural Language Processing. For the current predicament, we propose that the future success of gene therapy may depend on breakthroughs in more advanced and exhilarating technologies such as the CRISPR-Cas system, CAR-T cell therapies, and gene delivery vector technology. The results show that evidence-based bibliometrics allows the dissection of gene therapy to inform scientific planning and decision-making.

Application of gene therapy in the treatment of superficial digital flexor tendon injury in horses.

Background: Tendon injuries are one of the most common causes of orthopedic disorders in horses. Such injuries involve a long course of treatment and recovery. The most promising method of treating these injuries is the use of recombinant proteins and gene therapy. Aim: In this work, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of plasmid DNA (pDNA) containing two species-specific coding sequences, i.e. vascular endothelial growth factor 164 (VEGF164) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), in the treatment of severe damage to the tendon of the superficial digital flexor. Methods: A pDNA construct was used to restore the damaged superficial digital flexor tendon in the horse. Results: This study showed that the administration of pDNA encoding VEGF164 and FGF2 genes at the injury area increased the regenerative activities of the damaged tendon. Conclusion: This study shows the therapeutic properties of genetic constructs (pDNA) and contributes to the advancements in the use of these therapies.

HTA methodology and value frameworks for evaluation and policy making for cell and gene therapies.

This last decade has been marked by significant advances in the development of cell and gene (C&G) therapies, such as gene targeting or stem cell-based therapies. C&G therapies offer transformative benefits to patients but present a challenge to current health technology decision-making systems because they are typically reviewed when clinical efficacy data are very limited and when there is uncertainty about the long-term durability of outcomes. These challenges are not unique to C&G therapies, but they face more of these barriers, reflecting the need for adapting existing value assessment frameworks. Still, C&G therapies have the potential to be cost-effective even at very high price points. The impact on healthcare budgets will depend on the success rate of pipeline assets and on the extent to which C&G therapies will expand to wider pathologies beyond rare or ultra-rare diseases. Getting pricing and reimbursement models right is important for incentivising research and development investment while not jeopardising the sustainability of healthcare systems. Payers and manufacturers therefore need to acknowledge each other's constraints-limitations in the evidence generation on the manufacturer side, budget considerations on the payer side-and embrace innovative thinking and approaches to ensure timely delivery of therapies to patients. Several experts in health technology assessment and clinical experts have worked together to produce this publication and identify methodological and policy options to improve the assessment of C&G therapies, and make it happen better, faster and sustainably in the coming years.

Annual Bleeding Rates: Pitfalls of Clinical Trial Outcomes in Hemophilia Patients.

Emerging treatment options for hemophilia, including gene therapy, modified factor products, antibody-based products, and other nonreplacement therapies, are in development or on their way to marketing authorization. For proof of efficacy, annual bleeding rates (ABRs) have become an increasingly important endpoint in hemophilia trials. We hypothesized that ABR analyses differ substantially between and within medicinal product classes and that the ABR observation period constitutes a major bias. For ABR characterization, an internal factor VIII (FVIII) treatment database has been built based on confidential clinical trial data submitted to the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI). Furthermore, anonymized data from 46 trial protocols submitted for review to the PEI were analyzed (FVIII replacement, n = 27; antibody-based, n = 12; and gene therapy, n = 7) for methodology. Definitions of bleeding episodes and ABR observational periods differed substantially in clinical trials. In the initial observation phase, individual ABRs of patients, treated prophylactically for 1 year, vary by about 40% (P < 0.001), which finally led to a significant reduction of the ABR group mean by 20% (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the high variance in ABRs constitutes a major challenge in statistical analyses. In conclusion, considerable heterogeneity and bias in the ABR estimation in clinical trials was identified, which makes it substantially more difficult to compare the efficacy of different treatment regimens and products. Thus, awareness of the important pitfalls when using ABR as a clinical outcome is needed in the evaluation of hemophilia therapies for patients, physicians, regulators, and health technology assessment agencies.

Publication rates and reported results in a cohort of gene- and cell-based therapy trials.

Aim: We investigated publication rates and reported results for gene- and cell-based therapy trials. Materials & methods: In a cohort of Institutional Review Board (IRB)-authorized trials during 2007-2017 in the Netherlands (n = 105), we examine publication rates and reported results in scientific papers and conference abstracts as well as associations with the occurrence of trial characteristics. Results: The publication rate for scientific papers was 27% and 17% for conference abstracts (median survival time: 1050 days). Academic hospitals published more in scientific papers whereas private sponsors published more in conference abstracts. Manufacturing protocols were underreported compared with clinical outcomes. Most publications reported positive results (78%). Conclusion: Publication rates are currently suboptimal indicating a need for enhanced knowledge sharing to stimulate gene- and cell-based therapy development.

Health-related quality of life in dogs treated with electrochemotherapy and/or interleukin-12 gene electrotransfer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the owners' perception of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of dogs after treatment with electrochemotherapy (ECT) alone or combined with interleukin-12 gene electrotransfer (IL-12 GET) and/or surgery. The owners of 44 dogs with histologically different tumours were offered the ¼Cancer Treatment Form« at least one month after treatment. The owners assessed their dogs' quality of life (QoL) after treatment as good (mean 7.4) (from 1-very poor to 10-excellent) and the general health compared with the initial diagnosis of cancer as improving (mean 3.9) (from 1-worse to 5-better). The assessment of the current QoL was better within the group of dogs treated with non-invasive treatment (ECT and/or IL-12 GET only), compared with those that received invasive treatment, where, in addition to ECT and/or IL-12 GET, surgery was performed (p < .05). The owners of dogs that achieved an objective response (OR) to the treatment assessed the QoL as significantly better compared with those whose dogs did not respond to the treatment (p < .05). The majority of the owners (86.4%) would opt for the therapy again, regardless of the financial costs. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that the majority of the owners of dogs assessed their dogs' QoL as good and felt that it improved after the treatment, especially in dogs, treated with non-invasive treatment and in those that responded to the treatment. This supports further use of ECT and IL-12 GET as suitable methods for the treatment of selected tumours in veterinary medicine.

Cell and gene therapy manufacturing capabilities in Australia and New Zealand.

Cell and gene therapy products are rapidly being integrated into mainstream medicine. Developing global capability will facilitate broad access to these novel therapeutics. An initial step toward achieving this goal is to understand cell and gene therapy manufacturing capability in each region. We conducted an academic survey in 2018 to assess cell and gene therapy manufacturing capacity in Australia and New Zealand. We examined the following: the number and types of cell therapy manufacturing facilities; the number of projects, parallel processes and clinical trials; the types of products; and the manufacturing and quality staffing levels. It was found that Australia and New Zealand provide diverse facilities for cell therapy manufacturing, infrastructure and capability. Further investment and development will enable both countries to make important decisions to meet the growing need for cell and gene therapy and regenerative medicine in the region.

Marco legal europeo y español para el desarrollo de las terapias avanzadas y herramientas regulatorias y legales impulsadas a nivel internacional para facilitar el acceso de los pacientes / European and Spanish legal framework for the development of advanced therapies and regulatory and legal tools promoted at international level to facilitate patient access

El marco regulatorio de los medicamentos de terapias avanzadas (terapia celular somática, terapia génica, ingeniería de tejidos y combinados con productos sanitarios) se caracteriza por su singularidad debido a la complejidad en el desarrollo de estos medicamentos poniéndose de manifiesto en el escaso número que han alcanzado una autorización de comercialización. En Europa, al igual que en múltiples países de otros continentes, se han puesto en marcha diferentes medidas regulatorias y legales para intentar facilitar el acceso de los pacientes a estas terapias cuya principal barrera, más allá de la dificultad logística que conllevan, se encuentra en los elevados precios que alcanzan en el mercado

The legal framework of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (somatic cell therapy, gene therapy, tissue engineering and combined products with medical devices) is singular due to the complexity of the development of these products resulting in few medicines granted marketing authorization. In Europe, as well as in other countries from different continents, several legal and regulatory measures have been put in place to facilitate patients' accessibility to these medicinal products. Beyond the logistic challenge that ATMPs pose, the high price of marketed products represents a major barrier for accessibility

Gene therapy: evidence, value and affordability in the US health care system.

AIMS: To explore the challenges presented by gene therapies, discuss potential solutions, and present policy recommendations. METHODS: A review of the literature and series of expert interviews were conducted and discussed at a Policy Forum convened by The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER). The Policy Forum was attended by independent experts and senior representatives from 20 payer organizations and life sciences companies. RESULTS: Three categories of challenges are identified: evidence generation, assessing value and affordability. Possible solutions and policy recommendations are presented for each of the three main categories of challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Gene therapies present exciting opportunities, but also pose major challenges. Dialogue between manufacturers and payers around the issues and possible solutions is crucial.

Gene therapy research in Asia.

Gene therapy has shown great potential for the treatment of diseases that previously were either untreatable or treatable but not curable with conventional schemes. Recent progress in clinical gene therapy trials has emerged in various severe diseases, including primary immunodeficiencies, leukodystrophies, Leber's congenital amaurosis, haemophilia, as well as retinal dystrophy. The clinical transformation and industrialization of gene therapy in Asia have been remarkable and continue making steady progress. A total of six gene therapy-based products have been approved worldwide, including two drugs from Asia. This review aims to highlight recent progress in gene therapy clinical trials and discuss the prospects for the future in China and wider Asia.

Hospital Exemption for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: Issue in Application in the European Union Member States.

Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and the Council on advanced therapy medicinal products and amending Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 allowed the use of non - authorized advanced therapy medicinal products under the certain circumstances. This socalled hospital exemption rule needs to be applied in the each Member State of the European Union individually and for this purpose Member States should provide national procedures and control measures. The aim of this article is to clear up the criteria for hospital exemption listed in Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 and to contrast the difference in implementing hospital exemption rule into national legal regimes on examples of the United Kingdom, Lithuania and Poland.

[Gene therapy in Germany: from past to present]. / Gentherapie in Deutschland: Von der ersten klinischen Studie bis heute.

In 1994, the first clinical gene therapy trial was performed in Germany. Since then more than 2000 clinical gene therapy trials have been performed worldwide. After 20 years, a short résumé is drawn here.