Vimseltinib versus placebo for tenosynovial giant cell tumour (MOTION): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a locally aggressive neoplasm for which few systemic treatment options exist. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vimseltinib, an oral, switch-control, CSF1R inhibitor, in patients with symptomatic TGCT not amenable to surgery. METHODS: MOTION is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 35 specialised hospitals in 13 countries. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of TGCT for which surgical resection could potentially worsen functional limitation or cause severe morbidity. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with interactive response technology to vimseltinib (30 mg orally twice weekly) or placebo, administrated in 28-day cycles for 24 weeks. Patients and site personnel were masked to treatment assignment until week 25, unless progressive disease was confirmed earlier. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST) at week 25 in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05059262, and enrolment is complete. FINDINGS: Between Jan 21, 2022, and Feb 21, 2023, 123 patients were randomly assigned (83 to vimseltinib and 40 to placebo). 73 (59%) patients were female and 50 (41%) were male. Nine (11%) of 83 patients assigned to vimseltinib and five (13%) of 40 patients assigned to placebo discontinued treatment before week 25; one patient in the placebo group did not receive any study drug. Objective response rate per RECIST was 40% (33 of 83 patients) in the vimseltinib group vs 0% (none of 40) in the placebo group (difference 40% [95% CI 29-51]; p<0·0001). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1 or 2; the only grade 3 or 4 TEAE that occurred in more than 5% of patients receiving vimseltinib was increased blood creatine phosphokinase (eight [10%] of 83). One patient in the vimseltinib group had a treatment-related serious TEAE of subcutaneous abscess. No evidence of cholestatic hepatotoxicity or drug-induced liver injury was noted. INTERPRETATION: Vimseltinib produced a significant objective response rate and clinically meaningful functional and symptomatic improvement in patients with TGCT, providing an effective treatment option for these patients. FUNDING: Deciphera Pharmaceuticals.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor: case report and molecular investigation.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor is a benign neoplasm arising from the synovium of joints, including the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Despite its benign nature, these tumors may exhibit aggressive behavior. A 57-year-old woman with a swollen, hardened area in the left TMJ was referred to the university´s clinic. The diagnosis of tenosynovial giant cell tumor was made based on the presence of hyperplastic synovial lining containing mononuclear and giant cells, hemorrhagic areas, hemosiderin deposits, and calcification foci in the biopsy. A low condylectomy was performed, and histopathologic analysis of the surgical piece upheld the diagnosis. Due to histopathologic resemblance with other giant cell-rich lesions (giant cell granuloma of the jaws, brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism, and non-ossifying fibroma) for which signature mutations are known, mutational analysis of KRAS, FGFR1, and TRPV4 genes was conducted. The results revealed wild-type sequences for all the mutations tested, thereby supporting the diagnosis of tenosynovial giant cell tumor.

MRgFUS ablation of a recurrent tenosynovial giant cell tumor in the foot using ExAblate 2100 system in combination with patient immobilization device.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) treatment for certain anatomy locations can be extremely challenging due to patient positioning and potential motion. This present study describes the treatment of a recurrent tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the plantar forefoot using the ExAblate 2100 system in combination with patient immobilization device. METHODS: Prior to the treatment, several patient immobilization devices were investigated. Vacuum cushions were selected and tested for safety and compatibility with the treatment task and the MR environment. RESULTS: During the treatment, one vacuum cushion immobilized the patient's right leg in knee flexion and allowed the bottom of the foot to be securely positioned on the treatment window. Another vacuum cushion supported the patient upper body extended outside the scanner bore. 19 sonications were successfully executed. The treatment was judged to be successful. No immediate complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: MRgFUS treatment of a recurrent tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the right plantar forefoot was successful with the use of patient immobilization vacuum cushions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The immobilization system could be utilized to aid future MRgFUS treatment of lesions in challenging anatomic locations. Various sizes of the vacuum cushions are available to potentially better accommodate other body parts and treatment configurations.

Real-world drug utilization and treatment patterns in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors in the USA.

Aim: Real-world treatment patterns in tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) patients remain unknown. Pexidartinib is the only US FDA-approved treatment for TGCT associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. Objective: To characterize drug utilization and treatment patterns in TGCT patients. Methods: In a retrospective observational study using IQVIA's linked prescription and medical claims databases (2018-2021), TGCT patients were stratified by their earliest systemic therapy claim (pexidartinib [N = 82] or non-FDA-approved systemic therapy [N = 263]). Results: TGCT patients treated with pexidartinib versus non-FDA-approved systemic therapies were predominantly female (61 vs 50.6%) and their median age was 47 and 54 years, respectively. Pexidartinib-treated patients had the highest 12-month probability of remaining on treatment (54%); 34.1% of pexidartinib users had dose reduction after their first claim. Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the unmet need, utilization and treatment patterns of systemic therapies for the treatment of TGCT patients.

Treatment patterns in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors in the USAThis database study is the first investigation of how drugs are used to treat patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) in the real world. We researched adult TGCT patients from IQVIA's prescription and medical claims databases who started treatment with pexidartinib (N = 82) or other non-US FDA-approved systemic therapies (N = 263). The patients included in this analysis were mostly women (61.0 and 50.6%) and their median age was 47 and 54 years for pexidartinib and other non-FDA-approved systemic therapies, respectively. The patients treated with pexidartinib were most likely to remain on treatment (54.0%) at the end of the first year. Most patients (79.3%) started pexidartinib treatment at a total daily dose of 800 mg/day, as per the product label. Only 34.1% of patients had reduced medication dose during follow-up. Of note, this study found that TGCT patients were treated with other systemic therapies which remain unproven to be safe and effective in medical studies of TGCT. Given the unmet need, and with pexidartinib being the only approved systemic treatment in USA, there is an opportunity for the larger population of adult TGCT patients to benefit from its use. Further research is needed to identify barriers for access to pexidartinib and treatment of TGCT patients.

Active surveillance of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) is a mono-articular, soft-tissue tumor. Although it can behave locally aggressively, D-TGCT is a non-malignant disease. This is the first study describing the natural course of D-TGCT and evaluating active surveillance as possible treatment strategy. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included therapy naïve patients with D-TGCT from eight sarcoma centers worldwide between 2000 and 2019. Patients initially managed by active surveillance following their first consultation were eligible. Data regarding the radiological and clinical course and subsequent treatments were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with primary D-TGCT were initially managed by active surveillance. Fifty-nine patients had an MRI performed around first consultation: D-TGCT was located intra-articular in most patients (n = 56; 95 %) and extra-articular in 14 cases (24 %). At baseline, osteoarthritis was observed in 13 patients (22 %) on MRI. Most of the patients' reported symptoms: pain (n = 43; 70 %), swelling (n = 33; 54 %). Eight patients (13 %) were asymptomatic. Follow-up data were available for 58 patients; the median follow-up was 28 months. Twenty-one patients (36 %) had radiological progression after 21 months (median). Eight of 45 patients (18 %) without osteoarthritis at baseline developed osteoarthritis during follow-up. Thirty-seven patients (64 %) did not clinically deteriorate during follow-up. Finally, eighteen patients (31 %) required a subsequent treatment. CONCLUSION: Active surveillance can be considered adequate for selected therapy naïve D-TGCT patients. Although follow-up data was limited, almost two-thirds of the patients remained progression-free, and 69 % did not need treatment during the follow-up period. However, one-fifth of patients developed secondary osteoarthritis. Prospective studies on active surveillance are warranted.

Arthroscopic Excision of a Localized Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor of the Knee: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a proliferative lesion of the synovial membrane of the joints, tendon sheaths and/or bursae. There are two described subtypes, including the localized and diffuse forms. A TGCT can also be intraarticular or extraarticular. An intraarticular localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor (L-TGCT) of the knee is characterized by nodular hyperplasic synovial tissue that can remain asymptomatic for a long time, but as the mass grows, it may cause mechanical symptoms that may require surgical treatment. The aim of our study is to present a rare case of an L-TGCT of the knee joint treated with an arthroscopic excision. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a 17-year-old female with pain, swelling and knee locking in the absence of trauma. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) displayed a well-circumscribed small mass in the anterior medial compartment, adherent to the infrapatellar fat pad. The lesion presented the typical MRI characteristics of an intraarticular localized TGCT. The patient was treated with an arthroscopic mass removal and partial synovectomy. The gross pathology showed an ovoid nodule that was covered by a fibrous capsule; a histopathology examination confirmed the diagnosis. The patient was able to return to normal daily activities one month after surgery; at the three-year follow-up, she was free of symptoms with no evidence of disease on the MRI. CONCLUSION: In patients with a small-dimension L-TGCT in the anterior compartment of the knee that presents an MRI pattern and causes mechanical symptoms, an arthroscopic en-bloc excision can be performed that results in good outcomes and a rapid return to preinjury levels.

The MOTION study: a randomized, phase III study of vimseltinib for the treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumor.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm that occurs in the synovium of joints, bursae, or tendon sheaths and is caused by upregulation of the CSF1 gene. Vimseltinib is an oral switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically designed to selectively and potently inhibit the CSF1 receptor. Here, we describe the rationale and design for the phase III MOTION trial (NCT05059262), which aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vimseltinib in participants with TGCT not amenable to surgical resection. In part 1, participants are randomized to receive vimseltinib 30 mg twice weekly or matching placebo for ≤24 weeks. Part 2 is a long-term treatment phase in which participants will receive open-label vimseltinib.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (or TGCT) is a rare, noncancerous tumor that grows in the soft tissue lining the spaces of joints and bursae (fluid-filled sacs that work to reduce friction in the joints). These tumors are linked to increased levels of a protein called CSF1. While this condition is typically treated with surgery, some patients may not be candidates for surgical removal of the tumor due to factors such as location or complexity of the tumor; therefore, drug treatments are needed to help these patients. Vimseltinib is an investigational oral drug specifically designed to inhibit the receptor to which the CSF1 protein binds. In this article, we describe the rationale and design for a phase III clinical trial that will test how well vimseltinib works in participants with TGCT who are not candidates for surgery. In the first part of the study, participants are randomly assigned to receive vimseltinib 30 mg twice weekly or a matching placebo (inactive substance) for up to 24 weeks. This first part is blinded, so participants will not know if they are receiving vimseltinib or the placebo. The second part of the study is a long-term treatment phase in which all participants will receive vimseltinib (unblinded). Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05059262 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Real-World Patient Experience of Pexidartinib for Tenosynovial Giant-Cell Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Pexidartinib (Turalio) is the only systemic therapy approved by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with symptomatic tenosynovial giant-cell tumor (TGCT) associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations, and not amenable to improvement with surgery. This study assessed patient-reported treatment experiences and symptom improvement among patients receiving pexidartinib. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey collected data on demographics, disease history, pexidartinib dosing, and symptoms before and after pexidartinib use. RESULTS: Of 288 patients enrolled in the Turalio REMS program in May 2021, 83 completed the survey: mean age was 44.2 years, 62.7% were female, and most common tumor sites were in knee (61%) and ankle (12%). Mean initial dose was 622 mg/day: 29 patients reported reduction from initial dose and 8 had dose reduction after titrating up to a higher dose. At the time of survey completion, median time on pexidartinib was 6.0 months; 22 (26.5%) patients discontinued pexidartinib due to physician suggestion, abnormal laboratory results, side effect, or symptom improvement. Compared with before pexidartinib initiation, most patients reported improvement in overall TGCT symptom (78.3%) and physical function (77.2%) during pexidartinib treatment. Significant improvement was reported during pexidartinib treatment in worst stiffness numeric rating scale (NRS) (3.0 vs. 6.2, P < .05) and worst pain NRS (2.7 vs. 5.7, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Findings from this cross-sectional survey confirmed the benefit of pexidartinib in improving symptoms and functional outcomes among patients with symptomatic TGCTs from the patients' perspective. Future research is warranted to examine the long-term benefit and risk of pexidartinib.

CSF1 expression in xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumor/keratin-positive giant cell-rich tumor.

"Xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumor" (XGET) and "keratin-positive giant cell-rich soft tissue tumor" (KPGCT), two recently described mesenchymal neoplasms, likely represent different aspects of a single entity. Both tumors are composed of only a small minority of tumor cells surrounded by large numbers of non-neoplastic inflammatory cells and histiocytes, suggesting production of a paracrine factor with resulting "landscape effect," as seen in tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Recent evidence suggests that the paracrine factor in XGET/KPGCT may be CSF1, as in tenosynovial giant cell tumor. We hypothesized that CSF1 is overexpressed in XGET/KPGCT. To test our hypothesis, we performed quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) for CSF1 expression and CSF1 RNAscope chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) on 6 cases of XGET/KPGCT. All cases were positive with CSF1 CISH and showed increased expression of CSF1 by qPCR. Our findings provide additional evidence that the CSF1/CSF1R pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of XGET/KPGCT. These findings suggest a possible role for CSF1R inhibition in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic XGET/KPGCT.

Medium-term Outcomes of Excision Using Surgical Microscope of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors of the Hand.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The recurrence rate following the excision of tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TSGCT) of the hand is very high. Intraoperative application of a surgical microscope has been reported. However, to date, there are no reports of medium-term outcomes related to this technique. This study aimed to evaluate the medium-term outcomes of tumor excision using surgical microscope for TSGCT of the hand. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 27 patients, who underwent an initial surgery for histologically-confirmed TSGCT of the hand, between 2008 and 2020, were included and evaluated. The mean follow-up time postoperatively was 6.8 years. Tumor recurrence and preoperative tumor characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: All tumors were adherent to tendons, tendon sheaths, neurovascular structures or periarticular ligaments and capsules. Bony lesions were observed in 11 tumors. The surgical microscope was used in 13 tumors. Recurrences were observed in three tumors (overall recurrence rate: 11%). Tumor characteristics were similar in both groups, but the recurrence rate in the group treated using the surgical microscope was 0%, whereas the recurrence rate in the group treated without the surgical microscope was 21%. Re-operations using the surgical microscope for recurrent tumors were performed, without recurrence postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Among patients with TSGCT of the hand treated with tumor excision using the surgical microscope, the postoperative recurrence rate was 0%. Based on the results of this study, the surgical microscope might be used for excision of TSGCTs of the hand.

A Rare Clinical Presentation With a Difficult Imaging Diagnosis of an Intra-articular Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Knee.

ABSTRACT: Clear cell sarcoma, a highly aggressive cell sarcoma with melanotic differentiation, typically occurs in the tendon and aponeuroses of the lower extremities and rarely develops in the intra-articular region. Herein, we present an extremely rare case of clear cell sarcoma originating from the intra-articular knee and suspected as benign tumors due to the benign-looking findings on MRI and PET/CT. The image results in our case were completely consistent with a tenosynovial giant cell tumor, resulting in the misdiagnosis. For differential diagnosis, especially malignant melanoma, histopathology, including IHC and FISH, was indispensable.

What Are the Recurrence Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcomes After Multiportal Arthroscopic Synovectomy for Patients With Knee Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-cell Tumors?

BACKGROUND: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumor (D-TGCT), formerly known as pigmented villonodular synovitis, is a rare, locally aggressive, invasive soft tissue tumor that primarily occurs in the knee. Surgical excision is the main treatment option, but there is a high recurrence rate. Arthroscopic surgical techniques are emphasized because they are less traumatic and offer faster postoperative recovery, but detailed reports on arthroscopic techniques and outcomes of D-TGCT in large cohorts are still lacking. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the recurrence rate of knee D-TGCT after multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy? (2) What are the complications, knee ROM, pain score, and patient-reported outcomes for patients, and do they differ between patients with and without recurrence? (3) What factors are associated with recurrence after arthroscopic treatment in patients with D-TGCT? METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective study conducted between January 2010 and April 2021, we treated 295 patients with knee D-TGCTs. We considered patients undergoing initial surgical treatment with multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy as potentially eligible. Based on that, 27% (81 of 295) of patients were excluded because of recurrence after synovectomy performed at another institution. Of the 214 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 17% (36 of 214) were lost to follow-up, leaving 83% (178 of 214) of patients in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (50 of 178) of patients were men and 72% (128 of 178) were women, with a median (range) age of 36 years (7 to 69). The median follow-up duration was 80 months (26 to 149). All patients underwent multiportal (anterior and posterior approaches) arthroscopic synovectomy, and all surgical protocols were determined by discussion among four surgeons after preoperative MRI. A combined open posterior incision was used for patients with lesions that invaded or surrounded the blood vessels and nerves or invaded the muscle space extraarticularly. Standard postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was recommended for all patients with D-TGCT who had extraarticular and posterior compartment invasion; for patients with only anterior compartment invasion, radiotherapy was recommended for severe cases as assessed by the surgeons and radiologists based on preoperative MRI and intraoperative descriptions. Postoperative recurrence at 5 years was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator. The WOMAC score (0 to 96, with higher scores representing a worse outcome; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 8.5), the Lysholm knee score (0 to 100, with higher scores being better knee function; MCID 25.4), the VAS for pain (0 to 10, with higher scores representing more pain; MCID 2.46), and knee ROM were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Because we did not have preoperative patient-reported outcomes scores, we present data on the proportion of patients who achieved the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for each of those outcome metrics, which were 14.6 of 96 points on the WOMAC, 52.5 of 100 points on the Lysholm, and 2.32 of 10 points on the VAS. RESULTS: The symptomatic or radiographically documented recurrence at 5 years was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7% to 17%) using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with a mean recurrence time of 33 ± 19 months. Of these, three were asymptomatic recurrences found during regular MRI reviews, and the remaining 19 underwent repeat surgery. There was one intraoperative complication (vascular injury) with no effect on postoperative limb function and eight patients with postoperative joint stiffness, seven of whom improved with prolonged rehabilitation and one with manipulation under anesthesia. No postradiotherapy complications were found. The proportion of patients who achieved the preestablished PASS was 99% (176 of 178) for the VAS pain score, 97% (173 of 178) for the WOMAC score, and 100% (178 of 178) for the Lysholm score. A lower percentage of patients with recurrence achieved the PASS for WOMAC score than patients without recurrence (86% [19] versus 99% [154], OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.52]; p = 0.01), whereas no difference was found in the percentage of VAS score (95% [21] versus 99% [155], OR 0.14 [95% CI 0.01 to 2.25]; p = 0.23) or Lysholm score (100% [22] versus 100% [156], OR 1 [95% CI 1 to 1]; p = 0.99). Moreover, patients in the recurrence group showed worse knee flexion (median 135° [100° to 135°] versus median 135° [80° to 135°]; difference of medians 0°; p = 0.03), worse WOMAC score (median 3.5 [0 to 19] versus median 1 [0 to 29]; difference of medians 2.5; p = 0.01), and higher VAS pain score (median 1 [0 to 4] versus median 0 [0 to 4]; difference of medians 1; p < 0.01) than those in the nonrecurrence group, although no differences reached the MCID. No factors were associated with D-TGCT recurrence, including the use of postoperative radiotherapy, surgical technique, and invasion extent. CONCLUSION: This single-center, large-cohort retrospective study confirmed that multiportal arthroscopic surgery can be used to treat knee D-TGCTs with a low recurrence rate, few complications, and satisfactory postoperative outcomes. Surgeons should conduct a thorough preoperative evaluation, meticulous arthroscopic synovectomy, and regular postoperative follow-up when treating patients with D-TGCT to reduce postoperative recurrence. Because the available evidence does not appear to fully support the use of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in all patients with D-TGCTs and our study design is inadequate to resolve this controversial issue, future studies should look for more appropriate indications for radiotherapy, such as planning based on a more precise classification of lesion invasion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

[Diagnosis and management of tenosynovial giant cell tumor]. / Diagnostic et prise en charge de la tumeur à cellules géantes ténosynoviale.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor is a benign condition that originates from synovial cells within joints, tendon sheaths, or bursae and may present either in localized (benign) or diffuse (locally aggressive) forms. Currently, the primary treatment approach is surgical, yielding satisfactory results with low recurrence rates in the localized forms, whereas the diffuse type displays high recurrence rates. In parallel, clinical trials are underway to explore pharmaceutical treatment options for the advanced diffuse type. This article aims at consolidating current knowledge about diagnosis and management of this rare tumor, additionally proposing a brief overview of novel therapeutic approaches.

La tumeur à cellules géantes ténosynoviale, bénigne, prend son origine dans les cellules synoviales des articulations, des gaines tendineuses ou des bourses et se présente dans une forme soit localisée (bénigne), soit diffuse (localement agressive). Le traitement principal est chirurgical, offrant des résultats satisfaisants à long terme, avec un faible risque de récidive dans la forme localisée, alors que le taux de récidives est élevé dans la forme diffuse. Parallèlement, des essais cliniques sont en cours pour explorer des options de traitement systémique pour les formes diffuses sévères. Cet article rappelle les connaissances actuelles pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge de cette tumeur rare. De plus, nous proposons un aperçu succinct des nouvelles approches thérapeutiques.

Oncological and functional outcomes of modified arthroscopic resection for intra-articular tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the knee using multiple portals.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic resection of tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TS-GCT) presents favorable outcomes. However, there are reportedly higher recurrence rates in patients who had incomplete resection. To minimize incomplete resection, we established a multiple portal approach depending on the location of the disease. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic resection for both localized and diffuse types of TS-GCT of the knee. METHODS: From 2009 to 2019, 13 patients who underwent arthroscopic synovectomy of the knee and were histologically diagnosed with TS-GCT were included in this study. The pre- and postoperative range of motion (ROM) of the knee was measured. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were assessed at the final follow-up examination. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to detect incomplete resection or local recurrence. RESULTS: Among the 13 patients, seven and six had localized and diffuse type TS-GCT, respectively. Regarding the knee ROM, preoperative knee flexion in patients with the localized type was limited compared with that in those with the diffuse type. However, the ROM was significantly improved in patients with both types postoperatively. The JOA score and KOOS of patients with both types at the final follow-up were favorable, and there were no significant differences between both types. There was neither recurrence nor incomplete resection in any patient for both types. CONCLUSION: All patients, regardless of the TS-GCT type, achieved favorable outcomes after arthroscopic surgery; especially, the failure rate was 0%.

Identification of potential diagnostic biomarkers for tenosynovial giant cell tumour by integrating microarray and single-cell RNA sequencing data.

PURPOSE: Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a benign hyperplastic and inflammatory disease of the joint synovium or tendon sheaths, which may be misdiagnosed due to its atypical symptoms and imaging features. We aimed to identify biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity to aid in diagnosing TGCT. METHODS: Two scRNA-seq datasets (GSE210750 and GSE152805) and two microarray datasets (GSE3698 and GSE175626) were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. By integrating the scRNA-seq datasets, we discovered that the osteoclasts are abundant in TGCT in contrast to the control. The single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) further validated this discovery. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of the GSE3698 dataset were screened and the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses of DEGs were conducted. Osteoclast-specific up-regulated genes (OCSURGs) were identified by intersecting the osteoclast marker genes in the scRNA-seq and the up-regulated DEGs in the microarray and by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm. The expression levels of OCSURGs were validated by an external dataset GSE175626. Then, single gene GSEA, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, and gene-drug network of OCSURGs were performed. RESULT: 22 seurat clusters were acquired and annotated into 10 cell types based on the scRNA-seq data. TGCT had a larger population of osteoclasts compared to the control. A total of 159 osteoclast marker genes and 104 DEGs (including 61 up-regulated genes and 43 down-regulated genes) were screened from the scRNA-seq analysis and the microarray analysis. Three OCSURGs (MMP9, SPP1, and TYROBP) were finally identified. The AUC of the ROC curve in the training and testing datasets suggested a favourable diagnostic capability. The PPI network results illustrated the protein-protein interaction of each OCSURG. Drugs that potentially target the OCSURGs were predicted by the DGIdb database. CONCLUSION: MMP9, SPP1, and TYROBP were identified as osteoclast-specific up-regulated genes of the tenosynovial giant cell tumour via bioinformatic analysis, which had a reasonable diagnostic efficiency and served as potential drug targets.

Clinical retrospective analysis with a predictive model for diffused-tenosynovial giant cell tumors of the temporomandibular joint.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to find out the characteristics in relation to tumor recurrence in diffused-tenosynovial giant cell tumor of temporomandibular joint and to develop and validate the prognostic model for personalized prediction. METHODS: From April 2009 to January 2021, patients with diffused-tenosynovial giant cell tumor of temporomandibular joint at a single center were included in this study. The clinical features and local recurrence-free survival were assessed through the expression of the Ki-67 index and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor expression. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival. An independent predictor nomogram and pertinent tumor characteristics were included. RESULTS: The retrospective study enrolling seventy eligible patients at the Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. During the follow-up time, eleven patients suffered tumor recurrence. Age was an independent risk factor for local recurrence-free survival (P = 0.032). The Ki-67 index varied significantly in different sites (P = 0.034) and tumor volume (P = 0.017). Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop the prediction model using both statistical significance and prognostic indicators. The C-index of the nomogram based on age, site, Ki-67, and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor was 0.833. These variates provided good predicted accuracy for a nomogram on local recurrence-free survival. Diffused-tenosynovial giant cell tumor from the temporomandibular joint is extremely uncommon, and certain clinical traits are linked to the tumor proliferation index. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the risk indicators and developed a nomogram in this study to forecast the likelihood of local recurrence-free survival in patients with diffused-tenosynovial giant cell tumor from temporomandibular joint.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor: a case report.

BACKGROUND: This case reports the synchronous diagnosis of two rare unrelated diseases; leiomyosarcoma and tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the knee. It focuses on the challenges of diagnosing tenosynovial giant cell tumor, including cognitive biases in clinical medicine that delay diagnosis. It also demonstrates the pathogenic etiology of tenosynovial giant cell tumor, evidenced by the transient deterioration of the patients' knee symptoms following the administration of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor given as part of the chemotherapeutic regime for leiomyosarcoma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old Caucasian man presented with a left groin lump and left knee pain with swelling and locking. Investigations including positron emission tomography-computed tomography and biopsy revealed leiomyosarcoma in a lymph node likely related to the spermatic cord, with high-grade uptake in the left knee that was presumed to be the primary site. His knee symptoms temporarily worsened each time granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered with each cycle of chemotherapy for leiomyosarcoma to help combat myelosuppressive toxicity. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy of the knee confirmed a tenosynovial giant cell tumor. His knee symptoms relating to the tenosynovial giant cell tumor improved following the completion of his leiomyosarcoma treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor remains a diagnostic challenge. We discuss the key clinical features and investigations that aid prompt diagnosis. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma have recently been updated to include the pharmacological management of tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Our case discussion provides an up-to-date review of the evidence for optimal management of patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor, with a particular focus on novel pharmacological options that exploit underlying pathogenesis.

Bone SPECT/CT in Advanced Diffuse Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor of the Wrist.

ABSTRACT: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor, previously known as pigmented villonodular synovitis, is a benign low-grade fibrohistiocytic proliferation with hemosiderin deposits in synovial joints. Mostly affecting the knee, it can also manifest in other synovial joints, infrequently also in the wrist. Tenosynovial giant cell tumor typically causes intense radionuclide uptake in all phases in planar bone scintigraphy, making a differentiation from other bone tumors or osteomyelitis difficult, especially in cases associated with extensive bone destruction. We present a case of an unusually advanced and extended tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the wrist in bone scintigraphy, SPECT/CT, radiograph, and MRI.