ABSTRACT
A osteoartrite é uma importante afecção do aparelho locomotor de equinos, e os condroprotetores têm obtido papel importante no manejo da dor e como adjuvantes na redução de doses e na frequência de aplicação de outros fármacos que apresentam efeitos deletérios. O condroitim sulfato (CS) e a glucosamina (GlcN) são condroprotetores com potenciais efeitos anti-inflamatórios e anticatabólicos, cuja administração oral é a via mais frequente e controversa por resultar em baixa biodisponibilidade. Por essa razão, a administração intramuscular pode ser mais vantajosa. O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar os períodos de tempo para se atingir o pico de excreção urinária de CS e o início de declínio, após injeção intramuscular de produto à base de CS e de GlcN, em seis cavalos hígidos, na dose de 2 mL/100kg de condroitim sulfato A (750 mg/mL) e sulfato de glucosamina (750 mg/mL). Amostras de urina foram coletadas, no mesmo horário, no dia anterior (D-1), no dia da administração (D0), as quais constituíram o valor basal, e por mais sete dias (D1 a D7). O CS urinário foi extraído por cromatografia de troca iônica em coluna de Q-Sepharose Fast Flow, identificado por eletroforese em gel de agarose e mensurado por meio de densitometria, enquanto a creatinina urinária foi mensurada por analisador bioquímico automático. Os níveis de CS excretado (mg/L) aumentaram (P<0,0097) no D1 (24 horas) em relação ao momento basal (D0) e diminuíram no D7 (P<0,05) em relação ao D1, além dos níveis da relação CS/creatinina (mg/g) se elevarem significativamente (P<0,012) no D1 (24 horas) em relação ao basal e diminuírem no D5 (P<0,015), se comparados ao D1 e ao D2 (P<0,002). Não houve diferença significativa (P<0,05) da creatinina (g/L) nos momentos avaliados. Uma única aplicação de CS e de GlcN injetável foi capaz de aumentar consideravelmente as concentrações urinárias de CS 24 horas após, decaindo a partir do quinto dia. Esse período fundamenta o intervalo de cinco dias entre tratamentos injetáveis desses condroprotetores na OA em equinos.
Subject(s)
Animals , Osteoarthritis/veterinary , Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Horse DiseasesABSTRACT
Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease that causes substantial changes in joint tissues, such as cartilage degeneration and subchondral bone sclerosis. Chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine are commonly used products for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of these products when used as structure-modifying drugs on the progression of osteoarthritis in the rabbit temporomandibular joint. Thirty-six New Zealand rabbits were divided into 3 groups (n = 12/group): control (no disease); osteoarthritis (disease induction); and treatment (disease induction and administration of chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine). Osteoarthritis was induced by intra-articular injection of monosodium iodoacetate. Animals were killed at 30 and 90 days after initiation of therapy. The treatment was effective in reducing disease severity, with late effects and changes in the concentration of glycosaminoglycans in the articular disc. The results indicate that chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine may have a structure-modifying effect on the tissues of rabbit temporomandibular joints altered by osteoarthritis.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Experimental/drug therapy , Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Temporomandibular Joint/drug effects , Animals , Arthritis, Experimental/chemically induced , Arthritis, Experimental/diagnosis , Arthritis, Experimental/pathology , Cartilage, Articular/cytology , Cartilage, Articular/drug effects , Cartilage, Articular/pathology , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Extracellular Matrix/drug effects , Extracellular Matrix/pathology , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Injections, Subcutaneous , Iodoacetic Acid/administration & dosage , Iodoacetic Acid/toxicity , Male , Osteoarthritis/chemically induced , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/pathology , Rabbits , Severity of Illness Index , Temporomandibular Joint/pathologyABSTRACT
Aim: This study was performed to assess the effect of the phonophoretic application of a nanoemulsion incorporating glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate (NANO-CG) associated with kinesiotherapy on the reduction of pain and stiffness in knee chondropathy. Materials & methods: NANO-CG was tested in vitro and in vivo prior to being applied in a randomized and controlled clinical trial. Results: Cell viability and hen's egg test-chorionallantonic membrane tests indicated the NANO-CG is safe for topical application. Permeation tests showed NANO-CG enhances drug permeation through the skin. There was no statistical significance between treated groups in this preliminary study, however, pain reduction and complete recovery of articular cartilage were observed in some patients treated with NANO-CG. Conclusion: We demonstrate that NANO-CG may be a promising candidate for the therapy of knee chondropathy.
Subject(s)
Cartilage, Articular/physiopathology , Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Administration, Cutaneous , Animals , Chick Embryo , Emulsions , Humans , Knee/physiopathology , Nanomedicine , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Several studies, mainly in vitro, have shown that chondroitin sulfate (CS) and glucosamine (GlcN) do have chondro protective and anti-inflammatory actions. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether oral CS/GlcN supplementation has effects on the CS, hyaluronic acid (HA) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentrations on synovial fluid of equine osteoarthritic joints. Horses with mild osteoarthritis (OA) in tibiotarsal joint received daily PO doses of CS and GlcN (2.8/3.1 g) for 25 days. Synovial fluid (SF) and urine samples were collected before treatment (day 0), and every 7 days, until day 55 (30 days after the end of treatment). Urinary CS increased upon oral treatment, indicating that this compound was systemically distributed. Concerning the SF, CS concentration increased after the end of the treatment and returning to baseline afterwards, while HA and PGE2 concentrations did not change. Despite the systemic distribution, oral supplementation of CS/GlcNfor 25 days was insufficient as an anti-inflammatory support. However, it is possible to infer that there was an anabolic effect upon cartilage matrix.(AU)
Vários estudos, principalmente in vitro, têm mostrado que o condroitim sulfato (CS) e a glucosamina (GLcN) possuem ação condroprotetora e anti-inflamatória. O objetivo deste trabalho foi investigar se a administração oral de CS/GLcN possui efeito sobre as concentrações de CS, ácido hialurônico (AH) e prostaglandina E2 (PGE2) do liquido sinovial (LS) de articulações equinas com osteoartrite (OA). Cavalos diagnosticados com OA tibiotársica grau leve receberam por via oral doses diárias de CS e GlcN (2,8g/3,1g) por 25 dias. Amostras de LS e urina foram coletadas antes do tratamento (dia 0) e a cada 7 dias até o dia 55 (30 dias após o fim do tratamento). Houve aumento do CS urinário, indicando a distribuição sistêmica desse composto. No LS, a concentração de CS aumentou após o final do tratamento e retornou aos valores basais em seguida, enquanto as concentrações de HA e PGE2 não apresentaram alterações. Apesar da distribuição sistêmica, a suplementação oral de CS/GlcNpor 25 dias foi insuficiente como medida anti-inflamatória. Contudo, pode-se inferir que houve efeito anabólico sobre a matriz cartilagínea.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Horse Diseases/drug therapy , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/therapeutic use , Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Chondroitin Sulfates/therapeutic use , Synovial Fluid/drug effects , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis/veterinaryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of a new fixed dose combination of glucosamine sulfate and chondroitin sulfate capsules (GS/CS) versus the fixed dose combination of glucosamine hydrochloride and chondroitin sulfate (Cosamin DS®) in capsules in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHODS: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. Participants with knee OA Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1 to 3 and VAS of symptoms ≥4 cm were randomized to receive GS/CS or Cosamin DS® over 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the evaluation of the analgesic efficacy by the investigator. Secondary efficacy endpoints included: joint pain and swelling, investigator efficacy of the medication, and the use of rescue medication. Adverse events and drug tolerability were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred patients were randomized, and 50 patients were allocated to each group. The analgesic efficacy evaluated by the investigator in the GS/CS group was 88.9, 95%CI: 75.2, 95.8% and in the Cosamin DS® group was 85.4%; 95%CI: 70.1, 93.4%. The mean reduction in the pain intensity was significant in both groups (p < 0.001), with no difference between them. The primary efficacy analysis demonstrated the non-inferiority of the GS/CS group compared with the Cosamin DS® group; the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) between the two groups (- 8.39%) was higher than the established margin of non-inferiority of - 10.00%. Improvement in other efficacy outcomes was observed, again without differences between groups. Adverse events were similar between groups and both presented good tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: The new fixed-dose formulation of GS/CS is effective in treating knee OA, presenting a good safety and tolerability profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00955552?term=NCT00955552&rank=1 ; ClinicalTrials.gov ; register number NCT00955552; First randomized patient: 08/17/2010).
Subject(s)
Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Adult , Arthralgia/drug therapy , Brazil , Capsules , Chondroitin Sulfates/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Equivalence Trials as Topic , Female , Glucosamine/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Organic silicon (OS), glucosamine sulfate (GS), and methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) have been related to bone and connective tissue health and have been considered as basic therapy for osteoarthrosis disorders. Therefore, the aim was to analyze the effect of the association of these three components in mandibular bone defects in rats. Nine rats were used for histocompatibility test. In each animal was implanted the composition (70% OS, 15% GS, 15% MSM) and gutta percha (control) under the dorsal subcutaneous tissue. The samples were collected at 7, 14, and 21 days post-surgery and inflammatory events analyzed. In sequence, the composition was engrafted in mandibular bone defects of nine rats; bone defects without treatment were the control group. Analyses were performed at 7, 14, and 28 days post-surgery and samples were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For the histocompatibility test, both groups had a moderate inflammatory process at 7 days post-surgery and mild inflammatory process at 14 and 21 days. But in SEM analysis, the composition promotes an extensive reabsorption in cortical and crest alveolar bone, and great tooth root reabsorption. In conclusion, although the composition had positive result in the histocompatibility test, its direct application in mandibular bone defects caused intense resorption.
Subject(s)
Bone Regeneration/drug effects , Dimethyl Sulfoxide/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Mandible/drug effects , Silicon/administration & dosage , Sulfones/administration & dosage , Animals , Bone Regeneration/immunology , Dimethyl Sulfoxide/therapeutic use , Glucosamine/therapeutic use , Male , Mandible/immunology , Mandible/pathology , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Prostheses and Implants , Rats , Silicon/chemistry , Silicon/therapeutic use , Sulfones/therapeutic use , Wound Healing/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Osteoarthritis (OA), the commonest joint disorder, is a leading cause of disability. Symptomatic slow-acting drugs for OA (SYSADOA), particularly glucosamine plus chondroitin sulphate (GS/CS), are effective for symptom relief, protect joint cartilage and delay OA progression, with a good safety profile. D-002, a mixture of beeswax alcohols that inhibits both cyclooxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase activities, has been effective in experimental and clinical OA studies, showing also a chondroprotective effect. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of D-002 and GS/SC administered for 12 weeks on OA symptoms. METHODS: Participants were randomized to GS/CS (375/300 mg) or 50 mg D-002 once daily for 12 weeks. Symptoms were assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Individual Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Visual Analogy Scale (VAS) scores. The primary outcome was the reduction of the total WOMAC score. Secondary outcomes included WOMAC pain, stiffness and function scores, VAS score and rescue medication consumption. RESULTS: Of 60 randomized patients, 59 completed the study. D-002 and GS/SC reduced significantly total WOMAC score (72.1% and 78.5%, respectively), and pain, joint stiffness and physical function scores versus baseline. VAS scores decreased significantly with D-002 (76.6%) and GS/SC (76.8%). The reductions, significant from the second week, were enhanced over the trial. Rescue medications were consumed by 3/30 D-002 and 4/30 GS/SC patients. No differences between groups were found. Treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: D-002 (50 mg/day) administered for 12 weeks was safe and comparable to GS/SC for alleviating OA symptoms (pain, stiffness, and functional limitation) (RPCEC00000180).
Subject(s)
Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Fatty Alcohols/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chondroitin Sulfates/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fatty Alcohols/adverse effects , Female , Glucosamine/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Problema de investigación: Analizar los costos y la efectividad del condroitín más glucosamina, cetaminofén, celecoxib y AINEs para pacientes mayores de 50 años con osteoartrosis sintomática (primaria y secundaria) en Colombia. Tipo de evaluación económica: Análisis de costo-efectividad. Población objetivo: Personas mayores de 50 años de edad (hombres y mujeres) con osteoartrosis sintomática (primaria y secundaria) en Colombia. intervención y comparadores: I: condroitín más glucosamina, C: acetaminofén, celecoxib y AINEs. Horizonte temporal: Se empleó como horizonte temporal la expectativa de vida promedio de los pacientes con OA mayores a 50 años en Colombia. Puesto que la expectativa de vida promedio en Colombia es de 74 años para la población general (hombres y mujeres), se utilizó un horizonte de tiempo del modelo de 24 años con base en las estadísticas vitales del DANE. Perspectiva: La del Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud (SGSSS). Tasa de descuento: Tanto los costos como los beneficios son descontados al valor presente, utilizando una tasa de descuento del 5%. Estructura del modelo: Se estructuró un modelo Markov reflejando el curso clínico de la enfermedad con ciclos anuales. Fuentes de datos de efectividad y seguridad: Revisión de ensayos clínicos, meta-análisis y literatura clínica para la obtención de los parámetros para la modelación dinámica de la osteoartrosis sintomática en Colombia, y para la determinación de la efectividad de las alternativas de comparación. Desenlaces y valoración: Años de vida ganados. Costos incluidos: Costo de medicamentos para el tratamiento, Costo relacionados al manejo de eventos adversos, Costo de procedimientos e insumos. Fuentes de datos de costos: SISMED, Manual tarifario ISS 2001, Guía de práctica clínica para el síndrome coronario agudo. Resultados del caso base: El costo esperado por año de vida ajustado por calidad ganado de condroitín más glucosamina fue de $ 4.218.759,75 por persona, de $5.694.205,75 con AINEs, de $3.312.855,30 con celecoxib y de $2.616.444,62 con acetaminofén. El acetaminofén resultó en el mayor número de años de vida ajustados por calidad ganados (6,917). Estos resultados implican que el acetaminofén sería costo-efectivo y que es una estrategia dominante respecto a sus comparadores. Análisis de sensibilidad: Los análisis de sensibilidad llevados a cabo sobre la tasa de descuento y las variables con mayor impacto sobre la RICE evidencian que ninguno de estos parámetros \r\nmodifica los resultados encontrados. La dominancia del acetaminofén es consistente ante los escenarios \r\nplanteados. Adicionalmente, con el umbral establecido de mínimo un PIB y máximo tres PIB per cápita, se observa que el acetaminofén tiene una probabilidad de cerca de 100% de ser más costo-efectivo que los otros medicamentos incluidos en este estudio. Conclusiones: En Colombia, desde la perspectiva del sistema general de seguridad social en salud, la terapia combinada de condroitín más glucosamina para el tratamiento sintomático de pacientes mayores de 50 años de edad con osteoartrosis de rodilla o mano, es una tecnología dominada, indicando que no sería una alternativa costo-efectiva para el país. Entre las opciones evaluadas, el acetaminofén es la tecnología con mejor costo-efectividad, pues se asocia con costos más bajos y un incremento en años de vida ajustados por calidad.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Hand , Health Evaluation/economics , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Chondroitin/administration & dosage , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Colombia , Biomedical Technology , Celecoxib/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Acetaminophen/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Tecnologías evaluadas: Nuevas: condroitín más glucosamina y AINES (celecoxib y meloxicam) Actuales: acetaminofén y AINES (ibuprofeno, naproxeno y diclofenaco). Población: Pacientes mayores de 50 años con osteoartrosis sintomática (primaria y secundaria) en Colombia. Perspectiva: La perspectiva del presente AIP corresponde al tercero pagador, que en este caso es el Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud (SGSSS) en Colombia. Horizonte temporal: El horizonte temporal de este AIP en el caso base corresponde a un año. Adicionalmente se reportan las estimaciones del impacto presupuestal para los años 2 y 3, bajo el supuesto de la inclusión en el POS en el año 1. Costos incluidos: Costos por mg de los medicamentos analizados y costos de eventos adversos relacionados al uso de los medicamentos. Fuente de costos: Los precios de cada tecnología considerada fueron calculados con la base de datos SISMED 2014 y los precios relacionados con los eventos adversos fueron extraídos de la guía de práctica clínica para el síndrome coronario agudo. Escenarios: En el escenario 1 se considera que la adopción de las nuevas tecnologías no llevaría a ningún cambio en el mercado, debido a la fuerte preferencia de los médicos para el uso de las tecnologías actuales. En el escenario 2 se asume que la adopción de las nuevas tecnologías resultará en una disminución en el costo de dichas tecnologías, implicando un pequeño aumento en su participación de mercado. Resultados: Se requeriría una inversión de $324.848.741.965,21 para el año 1, $408.850.393.031,63 para el año 2 y $516.306.727.474,66 para el año 3 para la adopción de las terapias condroitín más glucosamina, meloxicam y celecoxib en el POS para el tratamiento de pacientes con osteoartrosis sintomática (primaria y secundaria) de la rodilla en Colombia, bajo el presupuesto que la inclusión de los nuevos medicamentos no llevaría a un cambio en la participación del mercado. Asumiendo que el precio de las nuevas terapias disminuyera y por tal razón la participación del mercado de dichas terapias aumentaría,\tel impacto presupuestal aumentaría a \r\n$33.328.838.947,92 en el año 1, de $44.301.385.949,68 en el año 2 y de $59.253.690.046,56 en el año 3.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chondroitin/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Celecoxib/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Health Evaluation/economics , Reproducibility of Results , Colombia , Costs and Cost Analysis/methods , Biomedical Technology , Drug Therapy, CombinationABSTRACT
We compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of glucosamine sulfate (GS) and chondroitin sulfate (CS) capsules or sachet preparations with glucosamine hydrochloride (GH) and CS capsules in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. 1,120 subjects with radiographic knee OA (Kellgren/Lawrence 2-3) were randomized (1:1:1) at 16 centers to receive GS 500 mg/CS 400 mg three times daily capsules (GI) or once daily sachet (GII) or GH 500 mg/CS 400 mg three times daily (GIII) for a 16-week trial. Primary outcome, intention-to-treat (ITT) was change from baseline of patient reported pain intensity (0-100 mm visual analogue scale) in the affected knee and variation of Lequesne's index (LI). Monthly secondary outcomes were changes from baseline in patient reported pain and LI, patient and physician global assessments of disease activity, acetaminophen consumption, and adherence. ITT population comprised 302, 301, and 306 patients in GI, GII, and GIII. Pain significantly decreased (GI = -30.9 ± 1.5; GII = -28.7 ± 1.5; GIII = -29.7 ± 1.5 mm) in all groups (P < 0.001) as well as LI (GI = -3.8 ± 0.2; GII = -3.7 ± 0.2; GIII = -3.9 ± 0.2; P < 0.001). All secondary outcomes improved (P < 0.005) for all groups. Patients that did not complete the study were 77 (44.8 %) for lack of adherence, 16 (9.3 %) consent withdrawal, 11 (6.4 %) adverse events, eight (4.7 %) lost to follow-up, and 17 (9.9 %) for other causes. Non-inferiority analysis found no differences among groups. This is a large study showing that GS/CS and GH/CS provide clinically meaningful and sustained analgesia in knee OA regardless of dose fractionation and capsule or sachet formulations.
Subject(s)
Chondroitin Sulfates/therapeutic use , Glucosamine/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Aged , Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management , Pain Measurement , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Introducción: la OA es la forma más común de enfermedad de las articulaciones y la principal causa de discapacidad de las personas de la tercera edad. Su alta prevalencia en una población que usualmente tiene comorbilidades asociadas que requieren otros medicamentos obliga a buscar otras alternativas terapéuticas con mínimos eventos adversos y pocas interacciones medicamentosas. Condroitín es un medicamento regenerador de cartílago que se ha usado en el manejo de estos pacientes. Esta evaluación tecnológica se desarrolló en el marco de la actualización integral del Plan Obligatorio de Salud para el año 2015. Objetivo: evaluar la efectividad y seguridad del uso de condroitín comparado con acetaminofén, antiinflamatorios no esteroideos, glucosamina, condroitín más glucosamina, diacereina, ácido hialurónico ó fitoterapéuticos, en pacientes osteoartrosis. Metodología: la evaluación fue realizada de acuerdo con un protocolo definido a priori por el grupo desarrollador. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects y LILACS, con restricción al idioma inglés y español y limitada a revisiones sistemáticas publicadas en los últimos cinco años y ensayos clínicos sin restricción de tiempo. Las búsquedas electrónicas fueron hechas entre octubre y diciembre de 2014 y se complementaron mediante búsqueda manual en bola de nieve y una consulta con expertos temáticos. La tamización de referencias se realizó por un revisor. La selección de estudios fue realizada mediante la revisión en texto completo de las referencias preseleccionadas, verificando los criterios de elegibilidad. La calidad de los estudios fue valorada con la herramienta de riesgo de sesgo de la Colaboración Cochrane. Las características de los estudios fueron extraídas a partir de las publicaciones originales. Se realizó una síntesis narrativa de las estimaciones del efecto para las comparaciones y desenlaces de interés a partir de los estudios de mejor calidad. Se estimaron medidas combinadas del efecto a través de un metanálisis con el método de Mantel-Haenszel y un modelo de efectos aleatorios, empleando el programa RevMan 5.2. Resultados: condroitín es semejante a los AINEs, glucosamina y glucosamina más condroitín en mejorar los desenlaces como dolor y funcionalidad a los seis meses y el desenlace radiológico proporción de pacientes con progresión de la disminución de la amplitud del espacio articular. Los AINEs, glucosamina y glucosamina más condroitín son superiores en los desenlaces rigidez a los seis meses según puntaje en la escala WOMAC (RR=5.97 IC 95% 1.45, 10.49). Condroitín sulfato es no inferior a pascledina en estos mismos desenlaces. Además en relación a seguridad no se reportó ningún evento adverso serio a ninguno de los medicamentos evaluados, incluyendo condroitín. La adherencia al tratamiento fue muy buena tanto a los seis meses como a los 24 meses y la percepción de tolerancia fue superior al 94%. Conclusiones: condroitín es semejante en efectividad y seguridad a glucosamina, glucosamina más condroitín, AINEs y pascledina en pacientes con osteoartrosis.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Chondroitin/administration & dosage , Anthraquinones/administration & dosage , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Colombia , Biomedical Technology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Phytotherapeutic Drugs , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Acetaminophen/administration & dosageABSTRACT
A osteoartrite (OA) é a causa mais frequente de doença crônica musculoesquelética, sendo sem dúvida a maior causa de limitação das atividades diárias entre os idosos. Atualmente, cerca de 40% dos adultos com idade superior a 70 anos sofrem de OA do joelho; destes, 80% apresentam limitações de movimento e em 25% as atividades diárias estão comprometidas. Nas últimas décadas têm ocorrido avanços na terapêutica da osteoartrite
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common cause of chronic musculoskeletal disease and the most prevalent reason for the limitation of daily activities of the elderly population. Currently, about 40% of adults aged over 70 suffer from OA of the knee. Of these, 80% suffer from limitations in motion and 25% are engaged to carry out their daily activities. In recent decades there have been advances in the treatment of osteoarthritis
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Hip/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Knee Joint , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis/rehabilitation , Patient Education as Topic , Viscosupplementation , Weight LossABSTRACT
This study evaluated the effect of oral glucosamine and intramuscular injection (IM) of snail mucin on the progression of experimental osteoarthritis (OA) in dogs. Twenty adult mongrels with mean body weight (12.4±1.8 kg) were used. Experimental OA was induced surgically using the groove model. The dogs were randomly divided into three groups following radiographic evidence of OA. Group one (control) comprised of ten dogs treated with normal saline twice weekly for four weeks following OA. Group two comprised of five dogs treated with 10mg/kg of oral glucosamine daily for four weeks. Group three comprised of five dogs treated with 5mg/kg intramuscular injection of 5% solution of snail mucin twice weekly for four weeks. Blood was obtained from the cephalic vein before surgical arthrotomy, after surgical arthrotomy, immediately after radiographic confirmation of OA (Week 0) and at two weeks interval up to 4 weeks of treatment. Efficacy of the drugs was assessed by changes in plasma IL-6 and MMP-3, while safety was determined using the changes in packed cell volume (PCV), total white blood cell counts (WBC) and observable adverse reactions associated with the administration of the drugs. In this study, the PCV and WBC did not differ significantly (P> 0.05) from the control group. Plasma IL-6 and MMP-3 were significantly (P< 0.05) lower both in glucosamine-treated and snail mucin-treated dogs up to week 4 of treatment when compared with the control group. However, there were no significant (P > 0.05) differences in IL-6 and MMP-3 between the two treatment groups. In addition, painful swelling at the site of injection was observed in dogs treated with snail mucin, while no adverse reaction was observed in dogs treated with oral glucosamine. It was therefore concluded that both oral glucosamine and IM injection of snail mucin comparably modified the progression of OA. However, owing to the adverse reaction noted with IM injection of snail mucin, further study is required to determine the most appropriate route of administration.
Se evaluaron los efectos de la glucosamina oral y la inyección intramuscular (IM) de mucina de caracol en la progresión de la osteoartritis (OA) experimental en perros. Fueron utilizados 20 perros mestizos adultos con un peso medio de 12,4±1,8 kg. La OA experimental se indujo quirúrgicamente mediante el modelo de ranura. Los animales se dividieron aleatoriamente en tres grupos después de la evidencia radiográfica de OA. El grupo 1 (control, 10 perros) fue tratado con una solución salina normal dos veces por semana durante cuatro semanas. El grupo 2 (5 perros) fue tratado con 10 mg/kg de glucosamina oral al día por cuatro semanas, y el grupo 3 (5 perros) fue tratado con 5 mg/kg IM de una solución de mucina de caracol al 5% dos veces por semana durante cuatro semanas. Se obtuvieron muestras de sangre desde la vena cefálica previo a la artrotomía quirúrgica, después de la artrotomía e inmediatamente después de la confirmación radiográfica de OA (semana 0), y en el intervalo de dos semanas hasta cuatro semanas de tratamiento. La eficacia de los fármacos se evaluó por los cambios plasmáticos de IL-6 y MMP-3, mientras que la seguridad, se determinó por los cambios en el volumen del hematocrito (VH), el recuento total de glóbulos blancos (RGB), y la observación de reacciones adversas asociadas a la administración de fármacos. El VH y RGB no difirieron significativamente (P>0,05) en el grupo control. Los niveles de IL-6 y MMP-3 plasmática fueron significativamente más bajas (P<0,05) en los perros tratados con glucosamina y mucina de caracol hasta 4 semanas, en comparación con el grupo control. Sin embargo, no hubo diferencias significativas (P>0,05) en la IL-6 y MMP-3 entre los dos grupos de tratamiento. Además, se observó un edema doloroso en el sitio de inyección de los perros tratados con mucina de caracol. En los perros tratados con glucosamina oral no se observó reacción adversa. Se concluye que tanto la glucosamina oral y la inyección IM de mucina de caracol modifican comparablemente la progresión de OA. Sin embargo, debido a la reacción adversa observada con la inyección IM de mucina caracol, se necesitan estudios adicionales para determinar la vía de administración más adecuada.
Subject(s)
Animals , Dogs , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Mucins/administration & dosage , Snails/chemistry , Administration, Oral , Interleukin-6/blood , Disease Progression , Matrix Metalloproteinases/blood , Disease Models, Animal , InjectionsABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Laboratory based controlled in vivo study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the in vivo effects of oral glucosamine sulfate on intervertebral disc degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although glucosamine has demonstrated beneficial effect in articular cartilage, clinical benefit is uncertain. A Centers for Disease Control report from 2009 reported that many patients are using glucosamine supplementation for low back pain, without significant evidence to support its use. Because disc degeneration is a major contributor of low back pain, we explored the effects of glucosamine on disc matrix homeostasis in an animal model of disc degeneration. METHODS: Eighteen skeletally mature New Zealand White rabbits were divided into 4 groups: control, annular puncture, glucosamine, and annular puncture + glucosamine. Glucosamine treated rabbits received daily oral supplementation with 107 mg/d (weight based equivalent to human 1500 mg/d). Annular puncture surgery involved puncturing the annulus fibrosus of 3 lumbar discs with a 16-gauge needle to induce degeneration. Serial magnetic resonance images were obtained at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 20 weeks. Discs were harvested at 20 weeks for determination of glycosaminoglycan content, relative gene expression measured by real time polymerase chain reaction, and histological analyses. RESULTS: The magnetic resonance imaging index and nucleus pulposus area of injured discs of glucosamine treated animals with annular puncture was found to be lower than that of degenerated discs from rabbits not supplemented with glucosamine. Consistent with this, decreased glycosaminoglycan was demonstrated in glucosamine fed animals, as determined by both histological and glycosaminoglycan content. Gene expression was consistent with a detrimental effect on matrix. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that the net effect on matrix in an animal model in vivo, as measured by gene expression, magnetic resonance imaging, histology, and total proteoglycan is antianabolic. This raises concern about this commonly used supplement, and future research is needed to establish the clinical relevance of these findings.
Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements/toxicity , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Glucosamine/toxicity , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/drug therapy , Intervertebral Disc/drug effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/drug effects , Administration, Oral , Animals , Biological Availability , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/pharmacokinetics , Glycosaminoglycans/metabolism , Intervertebral Disc/metabolism , Intervertebral Disc/pathology , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/genetics , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/metabolism , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/pathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/metabolism , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Rabbits , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is based on the synergism of a photosensitive drug (a photosensitizer) and visible light to destroy target cells (e.g., malignant, premalignant, or bacterial cells). The aim of this study was to investigate the response of normal rat tongue mucosa to PDT following the topical application of hematoporphyrin derivative (Photogem®), Photodithazine®, methylene blue (MB), and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles loaded with MB. One hundred and thirty three rats were randomly divided in various groups: the PDT groups were treated with the photosensitizers for 10 min followed by exposure to red light. Those in control groups received neither photosensitizer nor light, and they were subjected to light exposure alone or to photosensitizer alone. Fluorescent signals were obtained from tongue tissue immediately after the topical application of photosensitizers and 24 h following PDT. Histological changes were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, 7, and 15 days post-PDT treatment. Fluorescence was detected immediately after the application of the photosensitizers, but not 24 h following PDT. Histology revealed intact mucosa in all experimental groups at all evaluation time points. The results suggest that there is a therapeutic window where PDT with Photogem®, Photodithazine®, MB, and MB-loaded PLGA nanoparticles could safely target oral pathogenic bacteria without damaging normal oral tissue.
Subject(s)
Mouth Mucosa/drug effects , Photochemotherapy/adverse effects , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Animals , Fluorescence , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/analogs & derivatives , Glucosamine/pharmacology , Hematoporphyrin Derivative/administration & dosage , Hematoporphyrin Derivative/pharmacology , Lactic Acid/administration & dosage , Lactic Acid/pharmacology , Male , Methylene Blue/administration & dosage , Methylene Blue/therapeutic use , Mouth Mucosa/cytology , Mouth Mucosa/radiation effects , Nanoparticles/administration & dosage , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Polyglycolic Acid/administration & dosage , Polyglycolic Acid/pharmacology , Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer , Rats , Rats, WistarABSTRACT
Our objectives were to characterize the urinary excretion of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in horse osteoarthritis, and to investigate the effects of chondroitin sulfate (CS) and glucosamine (GlcN) upon the disease. Urinary GAGs were measured in 47 athletic horses, 20 healthy and 27 with osteoarthritis. The effects of CS and GlcN were investigated in mild osteoarthritis. In comparison to normal, urinary GAGs were increased in osteoarthritis, including mild osteoarthritis affecting only one joint. Treatment with CS+GlcN led to a long lasting increase in the urinary CS and keratan sulfate (KS), and significant improvement in flexion test of tarsocrural and metacarpophalangeal joints was observed. In conclusion, urinary CS and KS seems to reflect the turnover rates of cartilage matrix proteoglycans, and the measurement of these compounds could provide objective means of evaluating and monitoring joint diseases.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Chondroitin Sulfates/therapeutic use , Glucosamine/therapeutic use , Glycosaminoglycans/urine , Horse Diseases/urine , Osteoarthritis/veterinary , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Horse Diseases/drug therapy , Horses/urine , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis/urineABSTRACT
A rapid method for the quantification of glucosamine in human plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated. The sample preparation includes a simple deproteinization step, using D-[1-¹³C] glucosamine hydrochloride as an internal standard. Chromatographic separation was performed on an ACE Ciano column using isocratic elution with acetonitrile and aqueous 2 mM ammonium acetate containing 0.025% formic acid (80:20). Selected reaction monitoring was performed using the transitions m/z 180.1 â m/z 72.1 and m/z 181.0 â m/z 74.6 to quantify glucosamine and internal standard, respectively. The method was validated and proved to be linear, accurate and precise over the range 50-5000 ng/mL of glucosamine. Recovery rates higher than 90% were obtained for both glucosamine and internal standard. No matrix effect was detected in the samples. The validated method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study after oral administration of a powder for oral solution formulation containing glucosamine sulfate.
Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Glucosamine/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Administration, Oral , Female , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Glucosamine/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Male , Powders/administration & dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
A osteoartrose é uma doença crônica das articulações que, uma vez instalada, leva seus portadores a uma incapacidade funcional progressiva. Como os proteocondroitins sulfato são os maiores constituintes das cartilagens, espera-se que com a ingestão de glucosamina e condroitina haja uma melhora das condições biológicas desse tecido. Uma vez que não temos conhecimento de estudo da farmacocinética da administração oral dessa associação em seres humanos, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliá-la utilizando a associação entre o sulfato de glucosamina (SG) e o sulfato de condroitina (SC) administrada a dois grupos de doze voluntários sadios do sexo masculino (grupo I uma cápsula de (500 mg SG; 400 mg SC) e grupo II quatro cápsulas). Amostras de sangue foram retiradas a intervalos de tempo pré-definidos até 48 horas pós-dose. O SG e o SC foram dosados no plasma pelo método de DMMB (azul de 1,9,dimetildimetileno). A concentração máxima foi atingida em 2 horas (média ±SE; 0,893±0,093 'g/mL, grupo I e 2,222±0,313 'g/mL, grupo II). As áreas sob a curva até 48 horas foram de 10,803±0,965 'g-hr/mL e 38,776±2,981 'g-hr/mL, respectivamente para os grupos I e II. Os dois grupos apresentaram um segundo pico após 18 horas, indicando circulação êntero-hepática. Os nossos resultados indicam que essa associação é absorvida por via oral por mecanismo saturável, o que pode facilitar o seu uso em tratamentos clínicos.