The classification of feeding and eating disorders in the ICD-11: results of a field study comparing proposed ICD-11 guidelines with existing ICD-10 guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) is used globally by 194 WHO member nations. It is used for assigning clinical diagnoses, providing the framework for reporting public health data, and to inform the organization and reimbursement of health services. Guided by overarching principles of increasing clinical utility and global applicability, the 11th revision of the ICD proposes major changes that incorporate empirical advances since the previous revision in 1992. To test recommended changes in the Mental, Behavioral, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders chapter, multiple vignette-based case-controlled field studies have been conducted which examine clinicians' ability to accurately and consistently use the new guidelines and assess their overall clinical utility. This manuscript reports on the results from the study of the proposed ICD-11 guidelines for feeding and eating disorders (FEDs). METHOD: Participants were 2288 mental health professionals registered with WHO's Global Clinical Practice Network. The study was conducted in Chinese, English, French, Japanese, and Spanish. Clinicians were randomly assigned to apply either the ICD-11 or ICD-10 diagnostic guidelines for FEDs to a pair of case vignettes designed to test specific clinical questions. Clinicians selected the diagnosis they thought was correct for each vignette, evaluated the presence of each essential feature of the selected diagnosis, and the clinical utility of the diagnostic guidelines. RESULTS: The proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines significantly improved accuracy for all FEDs tested relative to ICD-10 and attained higher clinical utility ratings; similar results were obtained across all five languages. The inclusion of binge eating disorder and avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder reduced the use of residual diagnoses. Areas needing further refinement were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines consistently outperformed ICD-10 in distinguishing cases of eating disorders and showed global applicability and appropriate clinical utility. These results suggest that the proposed ICD-11 guidelines for FEDs will help increase accuracy of public health data, improve clinical diagnosis, and enhance health service organization and provision. This is the first time in the revision of the ICD that data from large-scale, empirical research examining proposed guidelines is completed in time to inform the final diagnostic guidelines.

Guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil. III - Challenges for implementation. / Diretrizes para detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil. III - Desafios à implementação.

The objective of the current article is to present the main challenges for the implementation of the new recommendations for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil, and to reflect on the barriers and the strategies to overcome them. The implementation of evidence-based guidelines is a global challenge, and traditional strategies based only on disseminating their recommendations have proven insufficient for changing prevailing clinical practice. A major challenge for adherence to the new guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil is the current pattern in the use of mammographic screening in the country, which very often includes young women and a short interval between tests. Such practice, harmful to the population's health, is reinforced by the logic of defensive medicine and the dissemination of erroneous information that overestimates the benefits of screening and underestimates or even omits its harms. In addition, there is a lack of policies and measures focused on early diagnosis of symptomatic cases. To overcome these barriers, changes in the regulation of care, financing, and implementation of shared decision-making in primary care are essential. Audit and feedback, academic detailing, and the incorporation of decision aids are some of the strategies that can facilitate implementation of the new recommendations.

O objetivo do presente artigo é apresentar os principais desafios à implementação das novas recomendações para a detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil, bem como refletir sobre as barreiras e estratégias para a sua superação. A implementação de diretrizes baseadas em evidências é um desafio em todo o mundo, e estratégias tradicionais baseadas apenas na disseminação de seu texto são comprovadamente insuficientes para gerar mudanças na prática clínica vigente. Um grande desafio à adesão às novas diretrizes para a detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil é o atual padrão de uso do rastreamento mamográfico no país, que acaba incluindo muito frequentemente mulheres jovens e intervalo curto entre os exames. Essa prática danosa à saúde da população é reforçada pela lógica da medicina defensiva e pela difusão de informações equivocadas, que superestimam os benefícios do rastreamento e subestimam ou mesmo omitem seus riscos. Além disso, há carência de políticas e ações voltadas para o diagnóstico precoce de casos sintomáticos. Para superar essas barreiras, mudanças relacionadas à regulação da assistência, financiamento e a implantação do processo de decisão compartilhada na atenção primária são essenciais. Auditoria-feedback, detalhamento acadêmico e incorporação de ferramentas de suporte à decisão são algumas das estratégias que podem facilitar o processo de implementação das novas recomendações.

El objetivo del presente artículo es presentar los principales desafíos para la implementación de las nuevas recomendaciones en la detección precoz del cáncer de mama en Brasil, así como reflexionar sobre las barreras y estrategias para su superación. La implementación de directrices, basadas en evidencias, es un desafío en todo el mundo, y las estrategias tradicionales basadas sólo en la propagación de las mismas son comprobadamente insuficientes para generar cambios en la práctica clínica vigente. Un gran desafío para la adhesión a las nuevas directrices para la detección precoz del cáncer de mama en Brasil es el actual patrón de uso del rastreo mamográfico en el país, que incluye a menudo a mujeres jóvenes e intervalo corto entre los exámenes. Esta práctica perjudicial para la salud de la población es reforzada por la lógica de la medicina defensiva y por la difusión de información equivocada, que sobrestiman los beneficios del rastreo y subestiman o incluso omiten sus riesgos. Asimismo, existe una carencia de políticas y acciones dirigidas al diagnóstico precoz de casos sintomáticos. Para superar estas barreras, son imprescindibles cambios relacionados con la regulación de la asistencia, financiación y la implantación del proceso de decisión compartida en la atención primaria. Algunas de las estrategias que pueden facilitar el proceso de implementación de las nuevas recomendaciones son: auditoría con retroalimentación, detalle académico e incorporación de herramientas de apoyo a la decisión son algunas de las estrategias que pueden facilitar el proceso de implementación de las nuevas recomendaciones.

Diretrizes para detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil. III - Desafios à implementação / Directrices para la detección precoz del cáncer de mama en Brasil. III - Desafíos a la implementación / Guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil. III - Challenges for implementation

O objetivo do presente artigo é apresentar os principais desafios à implementação das novas recomendações para a detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil, bem como refletir sobre as barreiras e estratégias para a sua superação. A implementação de diretrizes baseadas em evidências é um desafio em todo o mundo, e estratégias tradicionais baseadas apenas na disseminação de seu texto são comprovadamente insuficientes para gerar mudanças na prática clínica vigente. Um grande desafio à adesão às novas diretrizes para a detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil é o atual padrão de uso do rastreamento mamográfico no país, que acaba incluindo muito frequentemente mulheres jovens e intervalo curto entre os exames. Essa prática danosa à saúde da população é reforçada pela lógica da medicina defensiva e pela difusão de informações equivocadas, que superestimam os benefícios do rastreamento e subestimam ou mesmo omitem seus riscos. Além disso, há carência de políticas e ações voltadas para o diagnóstico precoce de casos sintomáticos. Para superar essas barreiras, mudanças relacionadas à regulação da assistência, financiamento e a implantação do processo de decisão compartilhada na atenção primária são essenciais. Auditoria-feedback, detalhamento acadêmico e incorporação de ferramentas de suporte à decisão são algumas das estratégias que podem facilitar o processo de implementação das novas recomendações.

El objetivo del presente artículo es presentar los principales desafíos para la implementación de las nuevas recomendaciones en la detección precoz del cáncer de mama en Brasil, así como reflexionar sobre las barreras y estrategias para su superación. La implementación de directrices, basadas en evidencias, es un desafío en todo el mundo, y las estrategias tradicionales basadas sólo en la propagación de las mismas son comprobadamente insuficientes para generar cambios en la práctica clínica vigente. Un gran desafío para la adhesión a las nuevas directrices para la detección precoz del cáncer de mama en Brasil es el actual patrón de uso del rastreo mamográfico en el país, que incluye a menudo a mujeres jóvenes e intervalo corto entre los exámenes. Esta práctica perjudicial para la salud de la población es reforzada por la lógica de la medicina defensiva y por la difusión de información equivocada, que sobrestiman los beneficios del rastreo y subestiman o incluso omiten sus riesgos. Asimismo, existe una carencia de políticas y acciones dirigidas al diagnóstico precoz de casos sintomáticos. Para superar estas barreras, son imprescindibles cambios relacionados con la regulación de la asistencia, financiación y la implantación del proceso de decisión compartida en la atención primaria. Algunas de las estrategias que pueden facilitar el proceso de implementación de las nuevas recomendaciones son: auditoría con retroalimentación, detalle académico e incorporación de herramientas de apoyo a la decisión son algunas de las estrategias que pueden facilitar el proceso de implementación de las nuevas recomendaciones.

The objective of the current article is to present the main challenges for the implementation of the new recommendations for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil, and to reflect on the barriers and the strategies to overcome them. The implementation of evidence-based guidelines is a global challenge, and traditional strategies based only on disseminating their recommendations have proven insufficient for changing prevailing clinical practice. A major challenge for adherence to the new guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil is the current pattern in the use of mammographic screening in the country, which very often includes young women and a short interval between tests. Such practice, harmful to the population's health, is reinforced by the logic of defensive medicine and the dissemination of erroneous information that overestimates the benefits of screening and underestimates or even omits its harms. In addition, there is a lack of policies and measures focused on early diagnosis of symptomatic cases. To overcome these barriers, changes in the regulation of care, financing, and implementation of shared decision-making in primary care are essential. Audit and feedback, academic detailing, and the incorporation of decision aids are some of the strategies that can facilitate implementation of the new recommendations.

Progress towards elimination of trans-fatty acids in foods commonly consumed in four Latin American cities.

OBJECTIVE: To assess progress towards the elimination of trans-fatty acids (TFA) in foods after the 2008 Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) recommendation of virtual elimination of TFA in Latin America. DESIGN: A descriptive, comparative analysis of foods that were likely to contain TFA and were commonly consumed in four cities in Latin America. SETTING: San José (Costa Rica), Mexico City (Mexico), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), Buenos Aires (Argentina). SUBJECTS: Foods from each city were sampled in 2011; TFA content was analysed using GC. TFA of selected foods was also monitored in 2016. RESULTS: In 2011-2016, there was a significant decrease in the content of TFA in the sampled foods across all sites, particularly in Buenos Aires (from 12·6-34·8 % range in 2011-2012 to nearly 0 % in 2015-2016). All sample products met the recommended levels of TFA content set by the PAHO. TFA were replaced with a mixture of saturated and unsaturated fats. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a virtual elimination of TFA from major food sources in the cities studied. This could be due to a combination of factors, including recommendations by national and global public health authorities, voluntary and/or mandatory food reformulation made by the food industry.

The association of Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Carotid Guideline Publication on utilization and outcomes of carotid stenting among "high-risk" patients.

OBJECTIVE: Since the 2004 approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration of carotid artery stenting (CAS), there have been two seminal publications about CAS reimbursement (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines; 2008) and clinical outcomes (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial [CREST]; 2010). We explored the association between these publications and national trends in CAS use among high-risk symptomatic patients. METHODS: The most recent congruent data sets of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were queried for patients undergoing carotid revascularization. The sample was limited to include only patients who were defined as "high-risk" if they had a Charlson Comorbidity Score of ≥3.0. Subgroup analyses were performed of high-risk patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Utilization proportions of CAS were calculated quarterly from 2005 to 2011 for NIS. Three time intervals related to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines and CREST publication were selected: 2005 to 2008, 2008 to 2010, and after 2010. Logistic regression with piecewise linear trend for time was used to estimate different trends in CAS use for the overall high-risk sample and for neurologically asymptomatic and symptomatic cases. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare odds of postoperative mortality and stroke between these two procedures at different time intervals independent of confounding variables. RESULTS: During the study period, 20,079 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) and 3447 CAS procedures were performed in high-risk patients in the NIS database. CAS utilization constituted 20.5% of carotid revascularization procedures among high-risk symptomatic patients, with a significant increase from 18.6% to 24.4% during the study period (P < .001). There was an initial increase during 2005 to 2008 in the rate of CAS compared with CEA, CAS utilization significantly decreased during 2008 to 2010 by a 3.3% decline in the odds ratio (OR) of CAS per quarter (OR, 0.967; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.943-0.993; P = .002), and after CREST (after 2010), CAS utilization continued to increase significantly from the prepublication to the postpublication time interval. The odds of in-hospital mortality (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.17-5.62; P = .019) and postoperative in-hospital stroke (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.09-3.68; P = .024) were independently and significantly higher for CAS patients in the overall sample. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CAS for carotid revascularization in a high-risk cohort of patients has significantly increased from 2005 to 2011. Compared with CEA, CAS independently increased the odds of perioperative in-hospital stroke in all high-risk patients and of in-hospital mortality in symptomatic high-risk patients.

Continuing to confront COPD International Surveys: comparison of patient and physician perceptions about COPD risk and management.

PURPOSE: Using data from the Continuing to Confront COPD International Physician and Patient Surveys, this paper describes physicians' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prognosis, and compares physician and patient perceptions with respect to COPD. METHODS: In 12 countries worldwide, 4,343 patients with COPD were identified through systematic screening of population samples, and 1,307 physicians who regularly saw patients with COPD were sampled from in-country professional databases. Both patients and physicians completed surveys about their COPD knowledge, beliefs, and perceptions; physicians answered further questions about diagnostic methods and treatment choices for COPD. RESULTS: Most physicians (79%) responded that the long-term health outlook for patients with COPD has improved over the past decade, largely attributed to the introduction of better medications. However, patient access to medication remains an issue in many countries, and some physicians (39%) and patients (46%) agreed/strongly agreed with the statement "there are no truly effective treatments for COPD". There was strong concordance between physicians and patients regarding COPD management practices, including the use of spirometry (86% of physicians and 76% of patients reporting they used/had undergone a spirometry test) and smoking cessation counseling (76% of physicians reported they counseled their smoking patients at every clinic visit, and 71% of smoking patients stated that they had received counseling in the past year). However, the groups differed in their perception about the role of smoking in COPD, with 78% of physicians versus 38% of patients strongly agreeing with the statement "smoking is the cause of most cases of COPD". CONCLUSION: The Continuing to Confront COPD International Surveys demonstrate that while physicians and patients largely agreed about COPD management practices and the need for more effective treatments for COPD, a gap exists about the causal role of smoking in COPD.

Transarterial chemoembolisation in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Survey on clinical practice in hospitals in the Madrid Region.

BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), having demonstrated survival benefits, is the treatmentof choice in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, although there is great heterogeneity in its clinical application. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey was sent to the Madrid Regional hospitals to assess applicability, indications and treatment protocols. The assessment was made overall and according to the type of hospital (groups A vs. B and C). RESULTS: Seventeen out of 22 hospitals responded (8/8 group A, 9/ 14 group B-C). All do/indicate transarterial chemoembolisation, 13/17 at their own facilities. Eight of the 17 hospitals have multidisciplinary groups (5/8 A, 3/9 B-C). Nine hospitals perform > 20 procedures/year (7 group A), and 6 from group B-C request/perform < 10/year. It is performed on an "on-demand" basis in 12/17. In 5 hospitals, all the procedures use drug-eluting beads loaded with doxorubicin. The average number of procedures per patient is 2. The mean time from diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma to transarterial chemoembolisation is ≤ 2 months in 16 hospitals. In 11/17 hospitals, response is assessed by computed tomography. Radiological response is measured without specific criteria in 12/17 and the other five hospitals (4 group A) assessed using standardised criteria. CONCLUSION: Uniformity among the Madrid Regional hospitals was found in the indication and treatment regimen. The use of DEB-TACE has become the preferred form of TACE in clinical practice. The differentiating factors for the more specialised hospitals are a larger volume of procedures, decision-making by multidisciplinary committees and assessment of radiological response more likely to be standardised.

Continuing to Confront COPD International Physician Survey: physician knowledge and application of COPD management guidelines in 12 countries.

AIM: Utilizing data from the Continuing to Confront COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) International Physician Survey, this study aimed to describe physicians' knowledge and application of the GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD diagnosis and treatment recommendations and compare performance between primary care physicians (PCPs) and respiratory specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicians from 12 countries were sampled from in-country professional databases; 1,307 physicians (PCP to respiratory specialist ratio three to one) who regularly consult with COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis patients were interviewed online, by telephone or face to face. Physicians were questioned about COPD risk factors, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment, including knowledge and application of the GOLD global strategy using patient scenarios. RESULTS: Physicians reported using spirometry routinely (PCPs 82%, respiratory specialists 100%; P<0.001) to diagnose COPD and frequently included validated patient-reported outcome measures (PCPs 67%, respiratory specialists 81%; P<0.001). Respiratory specialists were more likely than PCPs to report awareness of the GOLD global strategy (93% versus 58%, P<0.001); however, when presented with patient scenarios, they did not always perform better than PCPs with regard to recommending GOLD-concordant treatment options. The proportion of PCPs and respiratory specialists providing first- or second-choice treatment options concordant with GOLD strategy for a GOLD B-type patient was 38% versus 67%, respectively. For GOLD C and D-type patients, the concordant proportions for PCPs and respiratory specialists were 40% versus 38%, and 57% versus 58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This survey of physicians in 12 countries practicing in the primary care and respiratory specialty settings showed high awareness of COPD-management guidelines. Frequent use of guideline-recommended COPD diagnostic practices was reported; however, gaps in the application of COPD-treatment recommendations were observed, warranting further evaluation to understand potential barriers to adopt guideline recommendations.

The impact of psychopharmacology on contemporary clinical psychiatry.

Clinical psychiatric evaluations of patients have changed dramatically in recent decades. Both initial assessments and follow-up visits have become brief and superficial, focused on searching for categorical diagnostic criteria from checklists, with limited inquiry into patient-reported symptomatic status and tolerability of treatments. The virtually exclusive therapeutic task has become selecting a plausible psychotropic, usually based on expert consensus guidelines. These guidelines and practice patterns rest mainly on published monotherapy trials that may or may not be applicable to particular patients but are having a profound impact, not only on modern psychiatric practice but also on psychiatric education, research, and theory.

Current trends in reducing cardiovascular disease risk factors from around the world: focus on cardiac rehabilitation in Brazil.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in Brazil. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a program composed of structured exercise training, comprehensive education and counseling to positively impact functional, psychological, social, and quality of life aspects in these patients. However, the delivery of formal CR programs is limited to major metropolitan centers in Brazil and does not exist in much of the national territory, specifically in the North and Northeast regions. Barriers to the inclusion of qualified patients are lack of referral by the health professionals, as well as transportation difficulties, low income, lack of insurance coverage, and low educational level. Government efforts to implement CR programs on a broader scale, to reach a larger portion of the CVD population, are imperative. Additional research must be focused on the assessment of CR referral and adherence patterns as well as the effectiveness of different CR delivery models.

Trends in hospitalizations and mortality from asthma in Costa Rica over a 12- to 15-year period.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about trends in morbidity and/or mortality due to asthma in Latin America. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in hospitalizations and mortality due to asthma from 1997-2000 to 2011 in Costa Rica. METHODS: The rates of hospitalization due to asthma were calculated for each sex in 3 age groups from 1997 to 2011. The number of deaths due to asthma was first calculated for all groups and then for each sex in 3 age groups from 2000 to 2011. All analyses were conducted over the entire period and separately for the periods before and after a National Asthma Program (NAP) in 2003. Data also were available for prescriptions for beclomethasone since 2004. All analyses were conducted by using Epi Info. RESULTS: Substantial reductions were found in hospitalizations and deaths due to asthma in Costa Ricans (eg, from 25 deaths in 2000 to 5 deaths in 2011). Although, the percentage decrement in the rates of hospitalization for asthma in subjects <20 years old was similar before and after the NAP, the reduction in both deaths due to asthma and rates of asthma hospitalizations in older subjects were more pronounced after the NAP, when prescriptions for beclomethasone were also increased by approximately 129%. CONCLUSION: In Costa Rica, there was a marked decrement in hospitalizations and mortality due to asthma from 1997-2000 to 2011. In younger subjects, this is likely due to guidelines that, since 1988, recommend inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma. In older adults, the NAP probably enhanced reductions in hospitalizations and deaths due to asthma through inhaled corticosteroid use.

Current investigation and management of patients with syncope: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey.

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to provide an insight into the current practice of work-up and management of patients with syncope among members of the EHRA electrophysiology research network. Responses were received from 43 centres. The majority of respondents (74%) had no specific syncope unit and only 42% used a standardized assessment protocol or algorithm. Hospitalization rates varied from 10% to 25% (56% of the centres) to >50% (21% of the centres). The leading reasons for hospitalization were features suggesting arrhythmogenic syncope (85% of respondents), injury (80%), structural heart disease (73%), significant comorbidities (54%), and older age (41%). Most widely applied tests were electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, and Holter monitoring followed by carotid sinus massage and neurological evaluation. An exercise test, tilt table test, electrophysiological study, and implantation of a loop recorder were performed only if there was a specific indication. The use of a tilt table test varied widely: 44% of respondents almost always performed it when neurally mediated syncope was suspected, whereas 37% did not perform it when there was a strong evidence for neurally mediated syncope. Physical manoeuvres were the most widely (93%) applied standard treatment for this syncope form. The results of this survey suggest that there are significant differences in the management of patients with syncope across Europe, specifically with respect to hospitalization rates and indications for tilt table testing in neurally mediated syncope. The majority of centres reported using ECG, echocardiography, and Holter monitoring as their main diagnostic tools in patients with syncope, whereas a smaller proportion of centres applied specific assessment algorithms. Physical manoeuvres were almost uniformely reported as the standard treatment for neurally mediated syncope.

Elaboração da versão em português do Psychotherapy Process Q-Set / Development of a Portuguese version of the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set

INTRODUÇÃO: No Brasil, a pesquisa em psicoterapia encontra-se em desenvolvimento inicial; ainda não há estudos sistemáticos do processo terapêutico, e poucas são as medidas disponíveis para os pesquisadores interessados nesse campo. OBJETIVO: Elaborar a versão em português do Psychotherapy Process Q-Set. MÉTODO: A elaboração da versão em português do Psychotherapy Process Q-Set envolveu quatro etapas: tradução, retrotradução, avaliação da equivalência semântica e discussão, entre os autores, dos resultados. Para a aplicação do instrumento, cinco avaliadores foram treinados. Durante o treinamento, registros no diário de campo eram feitos para identificar dificuldades na execução da tarefa e subsidiar dados complementares. Após, o Psychotherapy Process Q-Set foi aplicado em sete sessões de uma psicoterapia psicodinâmica breve para examinar a concordância entre os juízes. RESULTADOS: A versão em português do Psychotherapy Process Q-Set apresentou boa equivalência semântica com a original. A avaliação da fidedignidade interavaliadores teve resultado satisfatório. Ressalta-se que a aplicação do Psychotherapy Process Q-Set requer estudo, tempo e reflexão. A discussão com os avaliadores apontou a necessidade de uma revisão do manual de aplicação no que diz respeito às vinhetas ilustrativas. Isto deverá ser realizado, futuramente, para minimizar as discrepâncias observadas no entendimento de alguns conceitos e para melhor adequá-las à realidade brasileira. CONCLUSÃO: O estudo disponibiliza a versão em português do Psychotherapy Process Q-Set, um instrumento versátil, que pode ser utilizado em diferentes contextos para descrever, quantitativamente e em termos clinicamente significativos, o processo terapêutico das diferentes psicoterapias.

INTRODUCTION: In Brazil, psychotherapy research is in its early development; there are no systematic studies of the therapeutic process, and there are few available measurement instruments for researchers interested in this field. OBJECTIVE: To develop a Portuguese version of the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set. METHOD: The development of a Portuguese version of the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set involved four stages: translation, back translation, evaluation of semantic equivalence and discussion of the results by the authors. Five raters were trained to apply the instrument. During the training, a field diary was used to record difficulties identified in task execution and to subsidize complementary data. Thereafter, the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set was applied to seven sessions of a short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy to examine agreement between referees. RESULTS: The Portuguese version of the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set presented good semantic equivalence with the original. The assessment of interrater reliability had a satisfactory result. It is worth stressing that applying the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set requires study, time and reflection. The discussion with raters pointed to the need of reviewing the application manual concerning the clinical examples. This will be performed in the near future to minimize the discrepancies observed in the understanding of some concepts and to better adjust them to the Brazilian reality. CONCLUSION: This study provides a Portuguese version of the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set, a versatile instrument that can be used in different contexts to quantitatively describe the therapeutic process of different psychotherapies in clinically significant terms.