Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 45
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259229, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34813617

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected Ethiopia since March 13, 2020, when the first case was detected in Addis Ababa. Since then, the incidence of cases has continued to increase day by day. As a result, the health sector has recommended universal preventive measures to be practiced by the public. However, studies on adherence to these preventive measures are limited. OBJECTIVE: To monitor the status of preventive practices of the population related to hand washing, physical distancing, and respiratory hygiene practices at selected sites within the city of Addis Ababa. METHODS: Weekly cross-sectional non-participatory observations were done during the period of April-June, 2020. Data was collected using the Open Data Kit (ODK) tool in ten public sites involving eight public facilities targeted for individual observations. Ten individuals were randomly observed at each facility over two days a week at peak hours of public services. WHO operational definitions of the preventive behaviors were adopted for this study. Observations were conducted anonymously at gates or entrances of public facilities and places. RESULTS: A total of 12,056 individual observations with 53% males and 82% in an estimated age range of 18-50 years age group were involved in this study. There was an increase in the practice of respiratory hygiene from 14% in week one to 77% in week 10, while those of hand hygiene and physical distancing changed little over the weeks from their baseline of 24% and 34%, respectively. Overall, respiratory hygiene demonstrated an increased rate of 6% per week, while hand hygiene and physical distancing had less than a 1% change per week, Females and the estimated age group of 18-50 years had practice changes in respiratory hygiene with no difference in hand hygiene and physical distancing practices. Respiratory hygiene took about six weeks to reach a level of 77% from its baseline of 24%, making an increment of about 9% per week. CONCLUSION: The public practice of respiratory hygiene improved threefold whereas hand hygiene and physical distancing revealed no change. Regularly sustained public mobilization and mass education are required to sustain the achievements gained in respiratory hygiene and further hand hygiene and physical distancing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/trends , Hand Disinfection/trends , Hand Hygiene/trends , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Physical Distancing , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Community Health Services/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Public Facilities/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
2.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0258662, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710135

ABSTRACT

We aimed to apply the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to increase effectiveness and sustainability of the World Health Organization's (WHOs) hand hygiene (HH) guidelines within healthcare systems. Our cross-sectional, mixed-methods study took place at Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC), a tertiary care hospital in Jimma, Ethiopia, between November 2018 and August 2020 and consisted of three phases: baseline assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment. We conducted questionnaires addressing HH knowledge and attitudes, interviews to identify HH barriers and facilitators within the SEIPS framework, and observations at the WHO's 5 moments of HH amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) at JUMC. We then implemented HH interventions based on WHO guidelines and results from our baseline assessment. Follow-up HH observations were conducted months later during the Covid-19 pandemic. 250 HCWs completed questionnaires with an average knowledge score of 61.4% and attitude scores indicating agreement that HH promotes patient safety. Interview participants cited multiple barriers to HH including shortages and location of HH materials, inadequate training, minimal Infection Prevention Control team presence, and high workload. We found an overall baseline HH compliance rate of 9.4% and a follow-up compliance rate of 72.1%. Drastically higher follow-up compared to baseline compliance rates were likely impacted by our HH interventions and Covid-19. HCWs showed motivation for patient safety despite low HH knowledge. Utilizing the SEIPS model helped identify institution-specific barriers that informed targeted interventions beyond WHO guidelines aimed at increasing effectiveness and sustainability of HH efforts.


Subject(s)
Hand Disinfection/methods , Hand Disinfection/trends , Hand Hygiene/methods , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hand Hygiene/trends , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tertiary Care Centers
3.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0259037, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710158

ABSTRACT

Epidemiological simulations as a method are used to better understand and predict the spreading of infectious diseases, for example of COVID-19. This paper presents an approach that combines a well-established approach from transportation modelling that uses person-centric data-driven human mobility modelling with a mechanistic infection model and a person-centric disease progression model. The model includes the consequences of different room sizes, air exchange rates, disease import, changed activity participation rates over time (coming from mobility data), masks, indoors vs. outdoors leisure activities, and of contact tracing. It is validated against the infection dynamics in Berlin (Germany). The model can be used to understand the contributions of different activity types to the infection dynamics over time. It predicts the effects of contact reductions, school closures/vacations, masks, or the effect of moving leisure activities from outdoors to indoors in fall, and is thus able to quantitatively predict the consequences of interventions. It is shown that these effects are best given as additive changes of the reproduction number R. The model also explains why contact reductions have decreasing marginal returns, i.e. the first 50% of contact reductions have considerably more effect than the second 50%. Our work shows that is is possible to build detailed epidemiological simulations from microscopic mobility models relatively quickly. They can be used to investigate mechanical aspects of the dynamics, such as the transmission from political decisions via human behavior to infections, consequences of different lockdown measures, or consequences of wearing masks in certain situations. The results can be used to inform political decisions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Contact Tracing/methods , Berlin , COVID-19/metabolism , Cell Phone/trends , Computer Simulation , Germany , Hand Disinfection/trends , Humans , Masks/trends , Models, Theoretical , Physical Distancing , Population Dynamics/trends , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Systems Analysis
4.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251694, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33979413

ABSTRACT

The main strategy for combatting SARS-CoV-2 infections in 2020 consisted of behavioural regulations including contact reduction, maintaining distance, hand hygiene, and mask wearing. COVID-19-related risk perception and knowledge may influence protective behaviour, and education could be an important determinant. The current study investigated differences by education level in risk perception, knowledge and protective behaviour regarding COVID-19 in Germany, exploring the development of the pandemic over time. The COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring study is a repeated cross-sectional online survey conducted during the pandemic in Germany from 3 March 2020 (waves 1-28: 27,957 participants aged 18-74). Differences in risk perception, knowledge and protective behaviour according to education level (high versus low) were analysed using linear and logistic regression. Time trends were accounted for by interaction terms for education level and calendar week. Regarding protective behaviour, interaction terms were tested for all risk perception and knowledge variables with education level. The strongest associations with education level were evident for perceived and factual knowledge regarding COVID-19. Moreover, associations were found between low education level and higher perceived severity, and between low education level and lower perceived probability. Highly educated men were more worried about COVID-19 than those with low levels of education. No educational differences were observed for perceived susceptibility or fear. Higher compliance with hand washing was found in highly educated women, and higher compliance with maintaining distance was found in highly educated men. Regarding maintaining distance, the impact of perceived severity differed between education groups. In men, significant moderation effects of education level on the association between factual knowledge and all three protective behaviours were found. During the pandemic, risk perception and protective behaviour varied greatly over time. Overall, differences by education level were relatively small. For risk communication, reaching all population groups irrespective of education level is critical.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Risk Reduction Behavior , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Fear/psychology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Hand Disinfection/trends , Hand Hygiene/methods , Hand Hygiene/trends , Health Risk Behaviors , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Perception , Risk Assessment/methods , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 50(3): 222-231, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33855318

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As part of infection control measures for COVID-19, individuals have been encouraged to adopt both preventive (such as handwashing) and avoidant behavioural changes (e.g. avoiding crowds). In this study, we examined whether demographics predicted the likelihood that a person would adopt these behaviours in Singapore. METHODS: A total of 1,145 participants responded to an online survey conducted between 7 March and 21 April 2020. We collected demographic information and asked participants to report which of 17 behaviour changes they had undertaken because of the COVID-19 outbreak. Regression analyses were performed to predict the number of behavioural changes (preventive, avoidant, and total) as a function of demographics. Finally, we sought to identify predictors of persons who declared that they had not undertaken any of these measures following the outbreak. RESULTS: Most participants (97%) reported at least one behavioural change on account of the pandemic, with changes increasing with the number of local COVID-19 cases (P<0.001). Additionally, women and those who were younger adopted more preventive behaviours (gender: P<0.001; age: P=0.001). Women were more likely to increase handwashing frequency, and younger individuals were more likely to wear face masks prior to legislation. Finally, women and those who were married adopted more avoidant behaviours (gender: P<0.001; marital status: P<0.001), with both groups avoiding crowded areas and staying home more than usual. Women also voluntarily reduced physical contact, whereas those who were married preferentially chose outdoor venues and relied on online shopping. CONCLUSION: Our characterisation of behavioural changes provides a baseline for public health advisories. Moving forward, health authorities can focus their efforts on encouraging segments of the population who do not readily adopt infection control measures against COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Hand Disinfection/trends , Health Behavior , Physical Distancing , Risk-Taking , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Policy , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Self Report , Sex Factors , Singapore/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors
6.
Infect Dis Poverty ; 10(1): 37, 2021 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33761984

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 has caused significant toll over the globe. Pregnant women are at risk of infection. The present study examined the frequency of washing hands with soap and wearing face mask when going out, prevalence of depression and anxiety, and identified their associated factors among pregnant women during the early phase of COVID-19 outbreak in China. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 24 February and 3 March 2020. A total of 15 428 pregnant women who were using maternal health care services in China completed a questionnaire which assessed their socio-demographic and pregnancy-related characteristics, contextual, cognitive and social factors related to COVID-19, frequency of washing hands and wearing face masks, and depression and anxiety. Logistics regression analyses were performed to identify the associated factors of preventive behaviours and mental health. RESULTS: The prevalence of probable anxiety and depression was 28.2% and 43.6% respectively. 19.8% reported always wearing face mask when going out, and 19.1% reported washing hands with soap for more than 10 times per day. Results from logistic regression analyses showed that older age was associated with lower levels of depression and anxiety (OR = 0.42-0.67) and higher frequency of washing hands (OR = 1.57-3.40). Higher level of education level was associated with probable depression (OR = 1.31-1.45) and higher frequency of wearing face mask (OR = 1.50-1.57). After adjusting for significant socio-demographic and pregnancy-related factors, place of residence being locked down (aOR = 1.10-1.11), being quarantined (aOR = 1.42-1.57), personally knowing someone being infected with COVID-19 (aOR = 1.80-1.92), perception that COVID-19 would pose long term physical harm to human (aOR = 1.25-1.28) were associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety, while the perception that the disease will be under control in the coming month was associated with lower levels of depression and anxiety (aOR = 0.59-0.63) and lower tendency of always wearing face mask (aOR = 0.85). Social support was associated with lower levels of depression and anxiety (aOR = 0.86-0,87) and higher frequency of washing hands (aOR = 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: The mental health and preventive behaviours of pregnant women during COVID-19 outbreak was associated with a range of socio-demographic, pregnancy-related, contextual, cognitive and social factors. Interventions to mitigate their mental health problems and to promote preventive behaviours are highly warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Health Behavior , Mental Health , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Age Factors , China , Depression/epidemiology , Educational Status , Female , Hand Disinfection/trends , Humans , Logistic Models , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Odds Ratio , Personal Protective Equipment , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/psychology , Prenatal Care , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
7.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(1): 30-33, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32818577

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Achieving high levels of hand hygiene compliance of health care personnel has been an ongoing challenge. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hand hygiene performance (HHP) rates in acute care hospitals. METHODS: HHP rates were estimated using an automated hand hygiene monitoring system installed in 74 adult inpatient units in 7 hospitals and 10 pediatric inpatient units in 2 children's hospitals. A segmented regression model was used to estimate the trajectory of HHP rates in the 10 weeks leading up to a COVID-19-related milestone event (eg, school closures) and for 10 weeks after. RESULTS: Three effects emerged, all of which were significant at P < .01. Average HHP rates increased from 46% to 56% in the months preceding pandemic-related school closures. This was followed by a 6% upward shift at the time school closures occurred. HHP rates remained over 60% for 4 weeks before declining to 54% at the end of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Data from an automated hand hygiene monitoring system indicated that HHP shifted in multiple directions during the early stages of the pandemic. We discuss possible reasons why HHP first increased as the pandemic began and then decreased as it progressed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence/trends , Hand Disinfection/trends , Health Personnel , Infection Control/trends , Automation , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection/standards , Hand Hygiene/standards , Hand Hygiene/trends , Hand Sanitizers , Hospitals , Humans , Infection Control/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Soaps , United States/epidemiology
8.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-877763

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION@#As part of infection control measures for COVID-19, individuals have been encouraged to adopt both preventive (such as handwashing) and avoidant behavioural changes (e.g. avoiding crowds). In this study, we examined whether demographics predicted the likelihood that a person would adopt these behaviours in Singapore.@*METHODS@#A total of 1,145 participants responded to an online survey conducted between 7 March and 21 April 2020. We collected demographic information and asked participants to report which of 17 behaviour changes they had undertaken because of the COVID-19 outbreak. Regression analyses were performed to predict the number of behavioural changes (preventive, avoidant, and total) as a function of demographics. Finally, we sought to identify predictors of persons who declared that they had not undertaken any of these measures following the outbreak.@*RESULTS@#Most participants (97%) reported at least one behavioural change on account of the pandemic, with changes increasing with the number of local COVID-19 cases (@*CONCLUSION@#Our characterisation of behavioural changes provides a baseline for public health advisories. Moving forward, health authorities can focus their efforts on encouraging segments of the population who do not readily adopt infection control measures against COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Age Factors , COVID-19/psychology , Follow-Up Studies , Hand Disinfection/trends , Health Behavior , Health Policy , Health Surveys , Pandemics , Physical Distancing , Risk-Taking , Self Report , Sex Factors , Singapore/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors
9.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye ; 43(3): 208-210, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32354653

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this project was to evaluate which personal protective equipment (PPE) eye care practitioners (ECP) will use during the next months and also what they will ask the patient to use in clinical practice. METHODS: A social-media survey was carried out, asking 257 optometrists and opticians in Germany, Austria and Switzerland (i) which PPE they intended to use in the future (after lockdown and before herd immunity and / or vaccine availability) and (ii) what they would ask the patient to do in terms of this. RESULTS: 75 % of the ECPs planned on wearing masks during refractions and 69 % when fitting contact lens. 62 % of the ECPs also expected their patients to wear masks in these tasks. This number is higher than for distance tasks such as fitting frames. Around 90 % of the ECPs would, in addition to hand washing, disinfect their hands and around 80 % expected their patients to do so too. Less than one third of ECPs favoured wearing safety spectacles, gloves and / or protective facial shields. 73 % planed on disinfecting frames after they would have been tried on by customers. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, most ECPs planed on continuing to use higher standards of PPE. Those, who intended to wear masks themselves, would ask their patients to also do so, combined with hand disinfection.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Optometrists/trends , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/trends , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Professional Practice/trends , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Eye Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hand Disinfection/trends , Health Surveys , Humans , Masks/statistics & numerical data , Optometrists/statistics & numerical data , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Professional Practice/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(2): 108-114, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32452036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, hygiene regulations have been revised and hand sanitation has been intensified. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the onset of hand eczema during the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare workers (HCWs) directly involved in intensive care of COVID-19 patients and HCWs without direct contact with COVID-19 patients. Hereby, we aim at increasing awareness about occupational hand eczema and preventive measures that can be adopted. METHOD: A survey was distributed amongst 114 HCWs at a single surgical centre and at a COVID-19 intensive care unit of the university hospital Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Germany. Participants were questioned about the daily frequency of hand hygiene prior to and during the pandemic. Participants self-reported the onset of hand eczema and associated symptoms. RESULTS: Our study revealed a significant increase in hand washing, disinfection, and use of hand cream across all participants (P-value <.001), regardless of having direct contact with COVID-19 patients. A high prevalence of symptoms associated with acute hand dermatitis of 90.4% was found across all HCWs, whereas hand eczema itself was underreported (14.9%). CONCLUSION: The increase in hand sanitation during the COVID-19 pandemic impairs the skin of the hands across all HCWs, independent of direct intensive care of affected patients.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Eczema/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hand Disinfection/trends , Hand Sanitizers/therapeutic use , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Skin Cream/therapeutic use , Adult , Asthma/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Prevalence , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Soc Sci Med ; 245: 112712, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846857

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Consistent hand washing with soap can reduce the risk of diarrhea, but changing hand-washing behavior is difficult. Systematic behavior change approaches promise to enhance hand washing with soap effectively, and allow the identification of active intervention ingredients using mediation analysis. This knowledge can then be used to derive hypotheses for systematically refining the intervention. OBJECTIVE: We demonstrate this at the example of a behavior change intervention to promote hand washing with soap based on the RANAS approach (risk, attitudes, norms, ability, and self-regulation). METHODS: Sixteen wards of Masvingo province in Zimbabwe were randomly allocated to the RANAS-based intervention or a wait-list control group. Hand washing at baseline and follow-up was observed for 224 randomly selected caregivers of young children. They additionally participated in quantitative face-to-face interviews assessing psychosocial factors. RESULTS: At baseline, hand washing with soap was <3% on average, and did not differ between groups (p = .526). At follow-up, intervention participants washed hands with soap more frequently than controls (in 29.4% vs. 8.2% of all stool- and food-related situations, B = 1.88, SE = 0.32, OR = 6.6, p < .001). Mediation analyses revealed that the intervention enhanced several of the targeted psychosocial factors; return, descriptive and injunctive norms, action knowledge, action self-efficacy, maintenance self-efficacy, action planning, and remembering. The intervention effect was mediated through increased remembering. CONCLUSION: This study supports the efficacy of a systematic approach to behavior change to promote hand washing with soap. The analyses of the mechanisms revealed important insights into the active ingredients of the intervention, which will facilitate its future refinement.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Hand Disinfection/trends , Health Behavior , Soaps , Adult , Caregivers/psychology , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Child , Diarrhea/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Rural Population , Zimbabwe
12.
Rev. esp. salud pública ; 94: 0-0, 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-196093

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: La higiene de manos (HM) es fundamental para la prevención de las infecciones relacionadas con la atención sanitaria (IRAS). Los índices de cumplimiento documentados, tanto en España como internacionalmente, son bajos, aunque una mejoría es posible utilizando algunas estrategias y formación. El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer la evolución de la adherencia a los 5 momentos de higiene de manos de los profesionales sanitarios del Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, y plantear medidas para implementarla. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio de observación directa sobre el cumplimiento de los 5 momentos de HM en este hospital durante siete años. Diferentes colectivos profesionales recibieron formación, utilizando el método tradicional y aprendizaje mediante simulación. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo, con frecuencias absolutas y relativas. Se analizaron mediante SPSS versión 21 para Windows. RESULTADOS: La adherencia aumentó de un 37% en 2011 a un 57,8% en 2019. El cumplimiento en los 5 momentos fue más alto después del contacto con el paciente que antes de este. El personal de enfermería fue uno de grupos con mayor cumplimiento. CONCLUSIONES: Aunque han mejorado, se necesita mantener los niveles de cumplimiento, y aumentarlos sobre todo en momentos tan cruciales como antes de realizar una técnica aséptica. La formación y la implementación de estrategias son clave


OBJECTIVE: Hand hygiene (HH) is essential for the prevention of health care-associated infections (HAIs). Compliance rates documented in Spain and internationally are low, although improvement is possible using some strategies and training. The aim of this study was to know the evolution of the adherence to the 5 moments for hand hygiene of the health professionals of the Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón and to propose measures to implement it. METHODS: A direct observation study about the compliance of the 5 moments for HH in this hospital for seven years was carried out. Different professional groups received training, using the traditional method and simulation learning. The data was summarized using percentages and absolute frequencies. They were analyzed using SPSS version 21 for Windows. RESULTS: Adherence increased from 37% in 2011 to 57.8% in 2019. Compliance in the 5 moments was higher after patient contact than before it. Nurses were one of the groups with the highest compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Even though they have improved, compliance rates need to be maintained and to increase especially in moments as crucial as before an aseptic procedure. Training and the implementation of strategies are key


Subject(s)
Humans , Hand Disinfection/trends , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety , Evaluation of Results of Preventive Actions , Spain/epidemiology
14.
BMC Res Notes ; 12(1): 736, 2019 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711535

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to assess the Magnitude of intestinal parasitic infections and associated factors among food handlers working at Woldia University Student's cafeteria, Northeastern Ethiopia. Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted among 256 study participants in Woldia university student's cafeteria, Northern Ethiopia. Systematic random sampling method was used to select the study participants. Data was collected using a standardized questionnaire by direct interviewing of study participants. Logistic regression was carried out to identify factors associated with intestinal parasitic infections. RESULTS: A total of 256 food handlers were enrolled making the overall magnitude of the intestinal parasite which was stool specimens positive for different diagnostic stages of parasites was found to be 43 (16.8%). Entamoeba histolytica/dispar was the most prevalent parasites 14 (5.5%), followed by Giardia lamblia 10 (3.9%). Lack of food safety training (AOR = 6.58; 95% CI 2.46-17.62), no regular medical checkup (AOR = 2.41; 95% CI 1.47-4.24), no handwashing practice after toilet by soap (AOR = 3.24; 95% CI 1.28-8.19), no handwashing practice before eating by soap (AOR = 4.03; 95% CI 1.64-9.91) and haven't food preparation license (AOR = 6.13; 95% CI 2.18-17.22) were significantly associated with parasitic infection among food handlers.


Subject(s)
Entamoebiasis/epidemiology , Food Handling/ethics , Food Services/ethics , Giardiasis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Entamoeba histolytica/isolation & purification , Entamoebiasis/parasitology , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Feces/parasitology , Female , Giardia lamblia/isolation & purification , Giardiasis/parasitology , Hand Disinfection/trends , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities , Workplace
15.
Soc Sci Med ; 235: 112398, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326766

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Many behaviours relevant to public health are part of everyday routines. However, few tools exist to study such behaviours. Here we re-introduce the behaviour setting, an ecological psychological concept developed in the 1950s, as an approach to the study of routine behaviour. The setting concept bridges theoretical and applied approaches in sociology, psychology and social practice; its components include stage, infrastructure, props, roles, norms, competencies, objectives and resultant routines. METHODS: We applied settings theory to health-related water use behaviour in rural Nigeria. We captured the dimensions of water use behaviour settings in 23 households at varying distances from newly-introduced kiosks selling purified water. RESULTS: We found that routines concerning drinking, laundering, dish washing and handwashing were stable in their settings, varying little between households or by type of water source. Hygiene routines were suboptimal but drinking water was carefully segregated. The majority of water use behaviour was governed, not by an immediate desire to maximise health, but by long-established routines embedded in the social, technical and physical environment. Water kiosks are making only marginal improvements to the quantity and quality of water being used in homes. CONCLUSIONS: Improving public health will require the disruption of settings, for example, through bringing water infrastructure directly to the home, through the sale of new props that facilitate hygienic routines, or in the disruption of gender roles via the promotion of new norms. Settings are an ecologically valid, meso-level theoretical approach that link social and techno-physical environmental factors to behaviour. They provide a comprehensive framework within which to judge avenues for changing routine behaviours. The behaviour settings tool we developed was easy to use, provided a systematic means of capturing the determinants of routine behaviour, and the findings offered insight into methods for disrupting such behaviour.


Subject(s)
Drinking , Psychological Theory , Behavior Observation Techniques , Environment , Hand Disinfection/methods , Hand Disinfection/trends , Humans , Nigeria
16.
PLoS Med ; 16(6): e1002841, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31242190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Helminth and protozoan infections affect more than 1 billion children globally. Improving water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition could be more sustainable control strategies for parasite infections than mass drug administration, while providing other quality of life benefits. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We enrolled geographic clusters of pregnant women in rural western Kenya into a cluster-randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01704105) that tested 6 interventions: water treatment, improved sanitation, handwashing with soap, combined water treatment, sanitation, and handwashing (WSH), improved nutrition, and combined WSH and nutrition (WSHN). We assessed intervention effects on parasite infections by measuring Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, hookworm, and Giardia duodenalis among children born to the enrolled pregnant women (index children) and their older siblings. After 2 years of intervention exposure, we collected stool specimens from 9,077 total children aged 2 to 15 years in 622 clusters, including 2,346 children in an active control group (received household visits but no interventions), 1,117 in the water treatment arm, 1,160 in the sanitation arm, 1,141 in the handwashing arm, 1,064 in the WSH arm, 1,072 in the nutrition arm, and 1,177 in the WSHN arm. In the control group, 23% of children were infected with A. lumbricoides, 1% with T. trichiura, 2% with hookworm, and 39% with G. duodenalis. The analysis included 4,928 index children (median age in years: 2) and 4,149 older siblings (median age in years: 5); study households had an average of 5 people, <10% had electricity access, and >90% had dirt floors. Compared to the control group, Ascaris infection prevalence was lower in the water treatment arm (prevalence ratio [PR]: 0.82 [95% CI 0.67, 1.00], p = 0.056), the WSH arm (PR: 0.78 [95% CI 0.63, 0.96], p = 0.021), and the WSHN arm (PR: 0.78 [95% CI 0.64, 0.96], p = 0.017). We did not observe differences in Ascaris infection prevalence between the control group and the arms with the individual interventions sanitation (PR: 0.89 [95% CI 0.73, 1.08], p = 0.228), handwashing (PR: 0.89 [95% CI 0.73, 1.09], p = 0.277), or nutrition (PR: 86 [95% CI 0.71, 1.05], p = 0.148). Integrating nutrition with WSH did not provide additional benefit. Trichuris and hookworm were rarely detected, resulting in imprecise effect estimates. No intervention reduced Giardia. Reanalysis of stool samples by quantitative polymerase chain reaction confirmed the reductions in Ascaris infections measured by microscopy in the WSH and WSHN groups. Trial limitations included imperfect uptake of targeted intervention behaviors, limited power to detect effects on rare parasite infections, and that it was not feasible to blind participants and sample collectors to treatment status. However, lab technicians and data analysts were blinded to treatment status. The trial was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the United States Agency for International Development. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of improved water quality, sanitation, and handwashing could contribute to sustainable control strategies for Ascaris infections, particularly in similar settings with recent or ongoing deworming programs. Combining nutrition with WSH did not provide further benefits, and water treatment alone was similarly effective to integrated WSH. Our findings provide new evidence that drinking water should be given increased attention as a transmission pathway for Ascaris. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01704105.


Subject(s)
Giardiasis/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection/trends , Nutrition Assessment , Rural Population/trends , Sanitation/trends , Water Purification , Adolescent , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Giardia , Giardiasis/epidemiology , Giardiasis/transmission , Hand Disinfection/methods , Helminths , Humans , Male , Sanitation/methods , Soil/parasitology , Treatment Outcome , Water Purification/methods
17.
Cult. cuid ; 22(52): 205-212, sept.-dic. 2018. graf, tab
Article in Portuguese | IBECS | ID: ibc-178814

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Identificar na literatura a execução e frequência das técnicas padronizadas de higienização das mãos pelos profissionais de enfermagem que atuam em unidades de centro cirúrgico. Método: Revisão integrativa por estudos primários indexados em bases de dados on line, em todos os idiomas. Resultados: Foram selecionados dois artigos que responderam à questão norteadora e atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Os resultados apontaram para a baixa adesão e frequência da higienização das mãos. Conclusão: Portanto, ressalta-se a importância de buscar estratégias para capacitar o profissional, que o torne capaz de identificar empecilhos que dificultam a realização da técnica correta de HM e que o oriente com relação à frequência adequada da lavagem das mãos de maneira eficaz para promoção da melhoria da assistência de saúde prestada


Objetivo: Identificar la ejecución literatura y la frecuencia de las técnicas de desinfección de manos estándar por profesionales de enfermería que trabajan en las unidades de sala de operaciones. Método: Revisión integrada de los estudios primarios indexadas en las bases de datos en línea en todos los idiomas. Resultados: Se seleccionaron dos artículos que responden a la pregunta de investigación y cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Los resultados mostraron una baja adherencia y la frecuencia de higiene de las manos. Conclusión: Por lo tanto, hacemos hincapié en la importancia de buscar estrategias para capacitar a los profesionales, lo que hace que sea capaz de identificar los obstáculos que impiden la realización de la técnica correcta de SM y al este con respecto a la frecuencia adecuada del lavado de manos con eficacia a la promoción de la asistencia sanitaria mejorada


Objective: To identify in the literature the execution and frequency of standardized hand hygiene techniques by nursing professionals who work in surgical center units. Method: Integrative review by primary studies indexed in online databases, in all languages. Results: Two articles were selected that answered the guiding question and met the inclusion criteria. The results pointed to the low adherence and frequency of hand hygiene. Conclusion: Therefore, it is important to seek strategies to train the professional, which makes him/her capable of identifying obstacles that impede the correct HM technique and orientate it in relation to the appropriate frequency of hand washing in an efficient way. Promotion of improved health care


Subject(s)
Humans , Perioperative Nursing , Hand Disinfection/methods , Hand Disinfection/trends , Sanitation , Hand Hygiene , Infection Control
18.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 59(3): E219-E225, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30397678

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite concerted efforts by governmental and non-governmental organizations, water and adequate sanitation still remain a challenge worldwide. Therefore, this study assessed the availability and utilization of sanitation facilities in Enderta district of Tigray, Ethiopia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2016. An interview and observation were conducted in a total of 450 households. An interviewer administered questionnaire and observation checklist were used to collect the data. Multivariable logistic regression was done to identify the predictors of availability and utilization of latrine, hand washing, and drinking water. RESULTS: Out of 450 households, only 68.4% had latrine of which only 21.4% had hand washing facility near the toilet. Likewise, only 9.3% washed their hand after toilet. However, all households had access to improved water source. In this study, proper utilization of latrine, hand washing, and water facilities was observed in 53%, 42.4% and 36.2% of the study households, respectively. The family size and getting sanitation information from health care providers, health extension workers, and health development army had a positive effect on availability and utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Though Community-Led total sanitation and hygiene approach has been implemented in the study area, the availability and proper utilization of latrine, and hand washing are still low. Only few households used drinking water properly. The education or information on hygienic practices found to affect the availability and utilization of the sanitation facilities positively. Therefore, strengthening the health extension workers and health development army to provide sustainable education and health information is needed.


Subject(s)
Hygiene , Rural Population , Sanitation/methods , Checklist , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia , Female , Hand Disinfection/trends , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Water Supply
19.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 99(4): 934-936, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30062982

ABSTRACT

We analyzed data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted among 20 schools in Rajshahi, Bangladesh, to explore the role of social influence on handwashing with soap (HWWS) in a primary school setting. Using data collected through covert video cameras outside of school latrines, we used robust Poisson regression analysis to assess the impact of social influence-defined as the presence of another person near the handwashing location-on HWWS after a toileting event. In adjusted analyses, we found a 30% increase in HWWS when someone was present, as compared with when a child was alone (Prevalence ratio 1.30; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.47, P < 0.001). The highest prevalence of HWWS was found when both child(ren) and adult(s) were present or when just children were present (64%). Our study supports the conclusion that the presence of another individual after a toileting event can positively impact HWWS in a primary school setting.


Subject(s)
Hand Disinfection/trends , Health Behavior , Health Education/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Students/psychology , Adult , Bangladesh , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Peer Influence , Schools , Soaps , Video Recording
20.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 99(4): 924-933, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30105966

ABSTRACT

Changing hand hygiene behavior at scale in the community remains a challenge. The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of Unilever's school-based "School of 5" handwashing campaign on handwashing with soap (HWWS) in schoolchildren and their mothers in the Indian state of Bihar. We conducted a cluster-randomized trial in two districts. We randomized a total of 32 villages with at least one eligible school to intervention and control groups (1:1) and recruited 338 households in each group for outcome measurement. We used structured observation in households to measure HWWS at target occasions (after defecation, soap use during bathing, and before each main meal) in schoolchildren and their mothers. Observers were blinded to intervention status. We observed 636 target occasions (297 in the intervention arm and 339 in the control arm) in mothers and school-going children. After the intervention, HWWS prevalence at target occasions was 22.4% in the control arm and 26.6% in the intervention arm (prevalence difference +4.4%, 95% confidence interval: -4.0, 12.8). The difference was similar in children and mothers. Observers appeared to be adequately blinded to intervention status, whereas observed households were successfully kept unaware of the purpose of observations. To conclude, we found no evidence for a health-relevant effect of the School of 5 intervention on HWWS in schoolchildren and their mothers. Qualitative research suggested that reasons for the low impact of the intervention included low campaign intensity, ineffective delivery, and a model possibly not well tailored to these challenging physical and social environments.


Subject(s)
Hand Disinfection/trends , Health Behavior , Health Education/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Child , Child, Preschool , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , India , Male , Mothers/psychology , Qualitative Research , Rural Population , Schools , Soaps
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL