Middle meningeal artery embolization following surgical evacuation of symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma improves outcomes, interim results of a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) remain undesirable in a significant proportion of patients. We aimed to show the role of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization and to demonstrate its benefits. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with symptomatic cSDH were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial following evacuation surgery. Participants were randomized to embolization or control group (expectant management following surgical evacuation without embolization). Patients were followed throughout their hospitalization and outpatient follow-ups. The main goals of this planned interim analysis were to assess neurological outcome and resource utilization. RESULTS: The groups were comparable in terms of sex, age and follow-up retention rates. Side(s) of intervention(s) and hematoma size were similar. There was no statistical difference in neurological examination improvement at discharge, but at follow-up, we observed a decline in neurologic exam in the control group (p = 0.03). Control group participants required more re-interventions (p = 0.02) and were followed in clinic and during related readmissions for longer (p = 0.02). The number of imaging studies obtained in relation to the disease management was higher in the control group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a beneficial role for the addition of MMA embolization to surgical intervention in the treatment of symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma. Neurological outcomes were significantly better in the embolization group. This contributed to less need for follow-up, re-interventions, and imaging studies.

Comparison of adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization using embosphere particles versus surgical drainage alone for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a primary and adjunctive therapy for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) in addition to conventional treatment. However, there is a scarcity of data that explicitly compares the effectiveness of adjunctive MMAE to surgical drainage alone (SDA), as well as the use of Embosphere particles. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of adjunctive MMAE in the treatment of symptomatic CSDH compared to SDA. METHODS: This prospective study included 43 patients with 52 CSDH sides, treated at a single institution between 2022 and 2023. The primary outcome was postoperative hematoma volume at 14, 30, 90, and 180 days after surgical drainage, which was analyzed using the generalized estimating equation. The secondary outcomes were the complications and recurrence/reoperation rate. Adjunctive MMAE was performed within 7 days following the surgery, utilizing Embosphere as the embolic material. RESULTS: The patients were assigned to either the adjunctive MMAE group (n = 20, 26 CSDH sides) or the SDA group (n = 23, 26 CSDH sides). The adjunctive MMAE group demonstrated a more significant reduction in hematoma volume (p = 0.007) and maximal hematoma thickness (p = 0.016) at all follow-up intervals. A trend towards lower recurrence and reoperation rates was observed with adjunctive MMAE; particularly, none of the patients in the adjunctive MMAE group experienced a recurrence of CSDH, compared to 19.2 % in the SDA group (p = 0.051). One procedural-related complication (3.8 %) in the adjunctive MMAE group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that adjunctive MMAE, compared to SDA, may enhance hematoma resolution and reduce the need for reoperation due to recurrence.

Additional treatment after primary conservative treatment in patients with chronic subdural hematoma-A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurological condition and is typically treated with burr hole craniostomy. Nevertheless, conservative treatment may lead to spontaneous hematoma resolution in some patients. This study aims to describe the characteristics of patients who were treated conservatively without the eventual need for additional treatment. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients who were primarily treated conservatively in three hospitals in the Netherlands from 2008 to 2018. The Primary outcome was the nonnecessity of additional treatment within 3 months after the initial CSDH diagnosis. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with not receiving additional treatment. RESULTS: In this study, 83 patients were included and 61 patients (73%) did not receive additional treatment within 3 months. Upon first presentation, the patients had a Markwalder Grading Scale score (MGS) of 0 (n = 5, 6%), 1 (n = 43, 52%), and 2 (n = 35, 42%). Additional treatment was less often received by patients with smaller hematoma volumes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78 per 10 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.92). Patients using antithrombotic medication also received less additional treatment, but this association was not significant (aOR 2.02; 95% CI 0.61-6.69). CONCLUSIONS: Three quarters of the initially conservatively treated CSDH patients do not receive additional management. Typically, these patients have smaller hematoma volumes. Further, prospective research is needed to distinguish which patients require surgical intervention and in whom primary conservative treatment suffices.

Facial nerve palsy after middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a case report.

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a safe and efficacious alternative to surgery for the treatment of new or recurrent chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). Several complications such as facial palsy may suddenly occur even in the absence of evident dangerous anastomoses in the angiogram. We herein present a case-report of left facial nerve palsy after MMAE.

[Az arteria meningea media embolisatio szerepe a krónikus subduralis haematoma kezelési algoritmusában, legújabb evidenciák és saját tapasztalataink]. / Az arteria meningea media embolisatio szerepe a krónikus subduralis haematoma kezelési algoritmusában, legújabb evidenciák és saját tapasztalataink.

Chronic subdural hematoma is one of the most common diseases requiring a neurosurgical operation that affect elderly and fragile patients. In addition to standard neurosurgical operations (trepanation and craniotomy), embolization of the meningeal artery media is an alternative solution. Several review aerticles have confirmed the very high rate of success and safety of the endovascular treatment. We present the technical details and results of our 10 consecutive selective media meningeal artery embolization procedures for residual chronic subdural hematomas. Our interventions were performed without complications and all resulted in complete recovery. 

Burr-hole drainage with or without irrigation for chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a Finnish, nationwide, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural haematoma is a common surgically treated intracranial emergency. Burr-hole drainage surgery, to evacuate chronic subdural haematoma, involves three elements: creation of a burr hole for access, irrigation of the subdural space, and insertion of a subdural drain. Although the subdural drain has been established as beneficial, the therapeutic effect of subdural irrigation has not been addressed. METHODS: The FINISH trial was an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, multicentre, nationwide, randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial in five neurosurgical units in Finland that enrolled adults aged 18 years or older with a chronic subdural haematoma requiring burr-hole drainage. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated block randomisation with block sizes of four, six, or eight, stratified by site, to burr-hole drainage either with or without subdural irrigation. All patients and staff were masked to treatment assignment apart from the neurosurgeon and operating room staff. A burr hole was drilled at the site of maximum haematoma thickness in both groups, and the subdural space was either irrigated or not irrigated before inserting a subdural drain, which remained in place for 48 h. Reoperations, functional outcome, mortality, and adverse events were recorded for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the reoperation rate within 6 months. The non-inferiority margin was set at 7·5%. Key secondary outcomes that were also required to conclude non-inferiority were the proportion of participants with unfavourable functional outcomes (ie, modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6, where 0 indicates no symptoms and 6 indicates death) and mortality rate at 6 months. The primary and key secondary analyses were done in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04203550) and is completed. FINDINGS: From Jan 1, 2020, to Aug 17, 2022, we assessed 1644 patients for eligibility and 589 (36%) patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group and treated (294 assigned to drainage with irrigation and 295 assigned to drainage without irrigation; 165 [28%] women and 424 [72%] men). The 6-month follow-up period extended until Feb 14, 2023. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 54 (18·3%) of 295 participants required reoperation in the group assigned to receive no irrigation versus 37 (12·6%) of 294 in the group assigned to receive irrigation (difference of 6·0 percentage points, 95% CI 0·2-11·7; p=0·30; adjusted for study site). There were no significant between-group differences in the proportion of people with modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6 (37 [13·1%] of 283 in the no-irrigation group vs 36 [12·6%] of 285 in the irrigation group; p=0·89) or mortality rate (18 [6·1%] of 295 in the no-irrigation group vs 21 [7·1%] of 294 in the irrigation group; p=0·58). The findings of the primary intention-to-treat analysis were not materially altered in the per-protocol analysis. There were no significant between-group differences in the number of adverse events, and the most frequent severe adverse events were systemic infections (26 [8·8%] of 295 participants who did not receive irrigation vs 22 [7·5%] of 294 participants who received irrigation), intracranial haemorrhage (13 [4·4%] vs seven [2·4%]), and epileptic seizures (five [1·7%] vs nine [3·1%]). INTERPRETATION: We could not conclude non-inferiority of burr-hole drainage without irrigation. The reoperation rate was 6·0 percentage points higher after burr-hole drainage without subdural irrigation than with subdural irrigation. Considering that there were no differences in functional outcome or mortality between the groups, the trial favours the use of subdural irrigation. FUNDING: State Fund for University Level Health Research (Helsinki University Hospital), Finska Läkaresällskapet, Medicinska Understödsföreningen Liv och Hälsa, and Svenska Kulturfonden.

Advances in pathogenic mechanisms, diagnostic methods, surgical and non-surgical treatment, and potential recurrence factors of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A review.

Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH) is a common hemorrhagic disease in neurosurgery, and with the intensification of global aging, its incidence is gradually increasing. With the advancement of scientific technology, the etiological concepts and surgical treatments for CSDH have continually evolved over time. Currently, neuroscientists' understanding of CSDH is no longer confined to bridging vein rupture; exploration of various mechanisms such as angiogenesis, maturation of blood vessels, and inflammation is also underway. In-depth exploration and discovery of pathogenic mechanisms guide the updating of clinical treatment strategies and methods. For different types of CSDH, there is now a clear guidance for the targeted selection of treatment methods. However, the current treatment of CSDH cannot completely solve all problems, and the updating of treatment methods as well as the development and validation of new effective drugs remain challenges for the future. In addition, the recurrence of CSDH is a significant issue that needs to be addressed. Although we have reviewed potential recurrent factors that may be associated, the strength of this evidence is insufficient. Future research should gradually focus on validating these recurrent factors and exploring new ones, in order to optimize the existing understanding and treatment of CSDH.