The landscape of inpatient admissions for alcoholic hepatitis in the era of early liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Liver transplant (LT) is a recent option available in the United States (US) to treat those with severe, refractory alcoholic hepatitis (AH). We examined changes in clinical characteristics of patients admitted with AH and tracked hospital outcomes as practice changes involving LT have shifted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we performed a cross-sectional analysis of patients admitted with AH during the years 2016-2020 in the US. Differences in clinical characteristics over time were assessed. To compare outcomes between 2016-2017 (when LT was less common) and 2018-2020 (when LT was more common), we conducted linear and logistic regression. Propensity-score matching was used to compare outcomes between patients with and without LT. RESULTS: From 2016-2017 to 2018-2020, patients admitted with AH tended to have a higher frequency of infection (p = 0.006), hepatorenal syndrome (<0.001), and ascites (<0.001). Hospital costs and length of stay (LOS) were highest in transplant hospitals, and costs rose over time in both non-transplant (NT) teaching and non-teaching hospitals (p < 0.001). Mortality decreased in NT teaching hospitals [aOR 0.7 (95% CI: 0.6-0.8)] and slightly decreased in NT non-teaching hospitals [aOR 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5-1.0)]. In the propensity-matched cohort involving LT versus non-LT patients, there was a 10% absolute reduction in-hospital mortality, but this came at a higher cost (p < 0.001) and length of stay (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of AH has been increasing over time, yet mortality has declined after adjusting for severity of disease. Patients who underwent LT survived; however, the healthcare burden of LT is substantial.

Early living donor liver transplantation for alcohol-associated hepatitis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Lately, there has been a steady increase in early liver transplantation for alcohol-associated hepatitis (AAH). Although several studies have reported favorable outcomes with cadaveric early liver transplantation, the experiences with early living donor liver transplantation (eLDLT) are limited. The primary objective was to assess one-year survival in patients with AAH who underwent eLDLT. The secondary objectives were to describe the donor characteristics, assess the complications following eLDLT, and the rate of alcohol relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study was conducted at AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India, between April 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent eLDLT. The mean time from abstinence to eLDLT was 92.4 ± 42.94 days. The mean model for end-stage liver disease and discriminant function score at eLDLT were 28.16 ± 2.89 and 104 ± 34.56, respectively. The mean graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 0.85 ± 0.12. Survival was 72% (95%CI, 50.61-88) after a median follow-up of 551 (23-932) days post-LT. Of the 18 women donors,11 were the wives of the recipient. Six of the nine infected recipients died: three of fungal sepsis, two of bacterial sepsis, and one of COVID-19. One patient developed hepatic artery thrombosis and died of early graft dysfunction. Twenty percent had alcohol relapse. CONCLUSIONS: eLDLT is a reasonable treatment option for patients with AAH, with a survival of 72% in our experience. Infections early on post-LT accounted for mortality, and thus a high index of suspicion of infections and vigorous surveillance, in a condition prone to infections, are needed to improve outcomes.

Trasplante hepático en hepatitis alcohólica aguda: ¿debemos decir que no?

Alcohol liver disease is one of the main indications for liver transplantation (LT). Currently, an abstinence period <6 months is required to include a patient with alcohol liver disease on the waiting list, a period that has not been shown to reduce the risk of relapse. Alcoholic hepatitis is characterized by hepatic decompensation secondary to recent, excessive consumption of alcohol, and LT may be the option in a well-selected group of patients who do not respond to medical treatment, but due to established sobriety intervals are excluded, this requires a change in the criteria established by the committees. We propose an evaluation algorithm to consider alcoholic hepatitis unresponsive to medical treatment for LT.

La enfermedad hepática por alcohol es una de las principales indicaciones de trasplante hepático (TH). Actualmente se requiere un período de abstinencia > 6 meses para incluir a un paciente con enfermedad hepática por alcohol en lista de espera de TH, periodo que no ha demostrado disminuir el riesgo de recaída. La hepatitis aguda por alcohol se caracteriza por una descompensación hepática secundaria a un consumo de alcohol excesivo reciente, y el TH puede ser la única opción en un grupo bien seleccionado de pacientes que no responden al tratamiento médico, pero debido a los intervalos de sobriedad establecidos son excluidos, y esto requiere un cambio en los criterios establecidos por los comités. Proponemos un algoritmo de evaluación para considerar para TH la hepatitis aguda por alcohol no respondedora a tratamiento médico.

Rising Trend in Waitlisting for Alcoholic Hepatitis With More Favorable Outcomes Than Other High Model for End-stage Liver Disease in the Current Era.

BACKGROUND: In the appropriate candidate, liver transplantation (LT) is a viable treatment for alcoholic hepatitis (AH). We compared the waitlisting trends and outcomes of AH patients in the context of others with high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. METHODS: LT listings for AH between January 1, 2008, and June 12, 2020 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Temporal trends in listings for AH were assessed. Covariate adjusted competing risks models evaluated waitlist mortality and LT rates between AH candidates and others with listing native MELD ≥30. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, waitlist additions for AH increased 6.5-fold. Waiting time for AH candidates was short (median 10 d). Delisting for clinical improvement was infrequent in AH, albeit higher than MELD ≥30 patients (3.3% versus 0.8%; P < 0.001). Among 99 centers with ≥1 AH listing, AH patients accounted for 0.2%-18.2% of all alcohol-related listings and 0.6%-25.0% of those with native listing MELD ≥30. Overall listing volume was larger at these 99 centers than the 40 with no AH listings (P < 0.001). AH candidates in 2014-2020 experienced improved waitlist survival (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.86; P = 0.002) and higher transplant rates (adjusted subhazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.25; P = 0.006) versus other MELD ≥30 candidates. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a rising trend in waitlisting patients with AH and high MELD score. Liver disease causes influence waitlist outcomes and those of AH candidates are more favorable. Further research and allocation adjustments may be needed to ensure equitable organ allocation, based on liver disease cause, for those on the LT waitlist.

Transplantation for Alcoholic Hepatitis: Are We Achieving Justice and Utility?

Early liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis is a potentially life-saving treatment. As this practice becomes increasingly common, however, the liver transplant community is taking a fresh look at a familiar challenge: best stewardship of donor organs. Herein, we examine a few basic, necessary ethical and practical concerns relevant to this indication.

Controversies in early liver transplantation for severe alcoholic hepatitis.

Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) is a condition of acute liver inflammation in the setting of heavy alcohol use that is often managed with corticosteroids in severe cases. Among non-responders to steroids, however, prognosis is poor with up to 75% mortality within 6 months after treatment failure. Early liver transplantation (LT) can achieve an acceptable short-term survival, and initial studies have demonstrated 3-year survival rates of up to 84%. However, the practice of early LT in severe AH remains controversial with concerns over the 6-month rule of sobriety and risk of alcohol relapse post-transplant. Proponents of LT advocate for better understanding of alcohol use as a disorder rather than self-inflicted cause of illness, aim to redefine the misguided application of the 6-month rule, and point out similar relapse rates among patients with early LT and those with greater than 6 months abstinence before transplant. Opponents of LT emphasize the correlation between alcohol relapse and graft failure and mortality, public resistance and potential for distrust among donors, and arguments that transplant centers need to establish improved models to predict relapse and standardize candidate selection criteria across centers. Here we review recent literature on this controversy and provide recommendations for moving forward to consensus.