Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 100
Filter
1.
Vaccine ; 42(19): 4046-4055, 2024 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762358

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In South Korea, the National Immunization Program has included one-dose varicella vaccination for 1-year-olds since 2005. This study examines the potential impact of introducing a two-dose varicella vaccination for children, along with zoster vaccination for adults, using either the zoster vaccine live (ZVL) or recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). METHODS: The investigation considered four strategies in a base case scenario. The first involved introducing zoster vaccination for 60-year-olds, with a 60 % coverage. The second strategy combined zoster vaccination with a second-dose varicella vaccination for 4-year-olds, with a 90 % coverage. An age-structured model spanning 50 years was employed, assuming a zoster vaccine catch-up campaign over the initial 5 years. Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted, assessing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs), and net loss under different ages at zoster vaccination (50, 60, 65, and 70 years) and varying willingness-to-pay (WTP) levels from ₩40 million ($34,998) to ₩84 million ($74,000). RESULTS: All strategies were cost-effective and significantly reduced herpes zoster (HZ) incidence, preventing approximately 3,077,000 to 7,609,000 cases, depending on the chosen strategy. The combined strategy prevented around 4,950,000 varicella and 653,000 HZ cases additionally. RZV outperformed ZVL by preventing twice as many HZ cases and offering greater QALY gains. However, ZVL was more cost-effective due to its lower cost. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that RZV became more cost-effective at higher WTP thresholds, exceeding ₩60.9 million ($53,193) in terms of ICER and ₩62.5 million ($54,591) for INMBs and net loss. The optimal age for zoster vaccination was 60 years concerning ICER but 50 years regarding INMB. CONCLUSIONS: Combining RZV with a two-dose varicella vaccination strategy reduced the disease burden and improved QALY more effectively, though ZVL remained more cost-effective at lower WTP levels. Decisions regarding vaccination policies should be balanced between the public health needs and WTP levels.


Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine , Chickenpox , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster Vaccine , Herpes Zoster , Models, Theoretical , Vaccination , Humans , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster/economics , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox Vaccine/immunology , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Child, Preschool , Aged , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/methods , Male , Female , Immunization Programs/economics , Child , Infant , Adult , Incidence , Herpesvirus 3, Human/immunology
2.
JAMA ; 331(23): 2043-2045, 2024 06 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780935

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study uses data from retail pharmacies to examine shingles vaccine uptake among Medicare Part D beneficiaries following an IRA policy to eliminate cost sharing.


Subject(s)
Cost Sharing , Herpes Zoster Vaccine , Herpes Zoster , Medicare Part D , Aged , Humans , Cost Sharing/economics , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Medicare Part D/economics , Medicare Part D/legislation & jurisprudence , United States , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/legislation & jurisprudence
3.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251644, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33984060

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Comprehensive cost-effectiveness analyses of introducing varicella and/or herpes zoster vaccination in the Swedish national vaccination programme. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analyses based on epidemiological results from a specifically developed transmission model. SETTING: National vaccination programme in Sweden, over an 85- or 20-year time horizon depending on the vaccination strategy. PARTICIPANTS: Hypothetical cohorts of people aged 12 months and 65-years at baseline. INTERVENTIONS: Four alternative vaccination strategies; 1, not to vaccinate; 2, varicella vaccination with one dose of the live attenuated vaccine at age 12 months and a second dose at age 18 months; 3, herpes zoster vaccination with one dose of the live attenuated vaccine at 65 years of age; and 4, both vaccine against varicella and herpes zoster with the before-mentioned strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accumulated cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for each strategy, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). RESULTS: It would be cost-effective to vaccinate against varicella (dominant), but not to vaccinate against herpes zoster (ICER of EUR 200,000), assuming a cost-effectiveness threshold of EUR 50,000 per QALY. The incremental analysis between varicella vaccination only and the combined programme results in a cost per gained QALY of almost EUR 1.6 million. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study are central components for policy-relevant decision-making, and suggest that it was cost-effective to introduce varicella vaccination in Sweden, whereas herpes zoster vaccination with the live attenuated vaccine for the elderly was not cost-effective-the health effects of the latter vaccination cannot be considered reasonable in relation to its costs. Future observational and surveillance studies are needed to make reasonable predictions on how boosting affects the herpes zoster incidence in the population, and thus the cost-effectiveness of a vaccination programme against varicella. Also, the link between herpes zoster and sequelae need to be studied in more detail to include it suitably in health economic evaluations.


Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Immunization Programs/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/transmission , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster/economics , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster/transmission , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpesvirus 3, Human/immunology , Herpesvirus 3, Human/pathogenicity , Humans , Immunization Programs/methods , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Models, Economic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sweden/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Virus Activation , Young Adult
4.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 19(2): 165-179, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997550

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Herpes zoster (HZ) or shingles occurs as a result of reactivation after a primary infection with varicella zoster virus (chickenpox). The burden of HZ in older adults in China is not well understood. We conducted a systematic literature review to understand the burden of disease related to HZ, its complications, and associated costs in China. AREAS COVERED: Using publications retrieved from Chinese and English literature databases, we described incidence and prevalence of HZ, occurrence of HZ-related complications, and costs associated with HZ in mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. EXPERT OPINION: The data, although limited, indicate that the burden of disease due to HZ is substantial in China, with incidence rates that are comparable to the rest of the world. Recently, an adjuvanted recombinant HZ vaccine was approved for use in China. Disease prevention is likely to reduce the burden of disease, with potentially significant economic benefits. However, understanding the public health impact of vaccination in China will require extensive baseline information about incidence, complication rates, and associated costs. This review gives an overview of available research, but also reveals existing gaps. Well-designed observational studies are needed to quantify the total burden of disease and potential impact of prevention through vaccination.


PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY What is the context? Although Herpes zoster (shingles) is a common disease of older age, the burden of disease in China is not well described. 32% of the Chinese population is aged 50 years and Older and this proportion is increasing. As a result of the ageing population, the public burden associated with shingles is expected to increase over time. What is new? We accessed published studies in the English and Chinese language literature to explore available information describing shingles in China. The incidence of shingles in Taiwan, Hong Kong and mainland China appears to be similar to other countries, although reliable population-based data are currently sparse in Hong Kong and mainland China. What is the impact? Data describing the disease burden due to shingles are currently heterogeneous throughout China. This review is a first step to determine those populations which could benefit most from shingles vaccination. Preventing shingles through vaccination could benefit the individual as well as provide potentially significant economic benefits for the individual, the employer and the economy.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , China/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster/economics , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Humans , Incidence , Prevalence , Public Health , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/methods
5.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 26(12): 1567-1575, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33043821

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the FDA approved the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) for the prevention of herpes zoster (HZ) in immunocompetent adults aged 50 years and older. RZV joined zoster vaccine live (ZVL) as U.S.-marketed vaccines against HZ. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices preferentially recommended use of RZV over ZVL. In order to inform population-based decision makers (PBDMs) about the incremental clinical and economic impact of RZV adoption, budget impact (BI) models may be used. Populating such models with national data can inform PBDMs about the incremental value of RZV adoption nationally; however, heterogeneity across health plans requires the inclusion of plan-specific data to ensure the relevance of modeling outcomes for plan-specific decision makers. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical and economic outcomes associated with the adoption of RZV in nationally representative populations with commercial and Medicare coverage and to demonstrate the effect of the heterogeneity of health plans using real-world data from a large, integrated delivery network (IDN). METHODS: We used a publicly available BI model. The model accounts for national and IDN-collected population characteristics (size, age distribution) and epidemiological data (incidence of HZ and complications, HZ recurrence rate), vaccine characteristics from randomized controlled trials and observational studies (efficacy, waning, second dose compliance for RZV, adverse event rate), national costs (vaccine, direct medical for HZ, complications, and vaccine adverse events), and current and anticipated vaccine coverage. We assessed incremental clinical (HZ cases and complications) and economic (per-member-per-month [PMPM] costs) impact at 5-year to 15-year time horizons, comparing scenarios where RZV is solely implemented with one where only ZVL is utilized. RESULTS: Following the adoption of RZV, the incremental HZ cases avoided over 5 and 15 years were estimated to be 1,800 and 15,000 for a commercial plan, 3,800 and 21,000 for a Medicare plan, and 8,600 and 71,000 for a specific IDN. The incremental PMPM budget impact over the same time horizons was estimated to be $0.42 and $0.31, respectively, for a commercial plan, $0.35 and $0.10 for a Medicare plan, and $0.39 and $0.25 for a specific IDN. The differences in results across plans resulted from the population age distribution, the vaccine copay (applied in the Medicare scenario only), the vaccine coverage in the plan, and other plan-specific factors affecting disease epidemiology and costs per case of HZ. CONCLUSIONS: Model projections indicated that RZV adoption avoided HZ cases and related complications, with the PMPM budget impact dependent on plan-specific factors. As health gains increased over time, the incremental costs incurred were found to decrease as the shorter-term costs of adopting the new vaccine were increasingly offset by the longer-term benefits of vaccination. DISCLOSURES: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA funded this study (GSK study identifier: HO-17-18378) and was involved in all stages of study conduct, including analysis of the data. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA also paid all costs associated with the development and publication of this manuscript. Patterson, Van Oorschot, and Curran are employees of the GSK group of companies and hold shares in the GSK group of companies. Herring, Carrico, and Zhang are employees of RTI Health Solutions, which received funding via a contractual agreement with the GSK group of companies to perform the work contributing to this research. Ackerson, Bruxvoort, Sy, and Tseng are employees of Kaiser Permanente Southern California, which was contracted by the GSK group of companies for the conduct of this study and were members of the KPSC study team. Ackerson, Bruxvoort, Sy, and Tseng report research contracts with the following pharmaceutical companies unrelated to this study: Dynavax (Ackerson, Bruxvoort, and Sy); the GSK group of companies (Ackerson, Bruxvoort, Sy, and Tseng); Novavax (Ackerson, Sy, and Tseng); and Seqirus (Ackerson, Bruxvoort, Sy, and Tseng). Tseng reports having served as a paid consultant for the GSK group of companies. The authors declare no other financial and nonfinancial relationships and activities. Findings from this study were presented at AMCP Nexus 2019; October 29-November 1, 2019; National Harbor, MD.


Subject(s)
Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Vaccination/economics , Budgets , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster/economics , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Humans , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , United States , Vaccines, Synthetic
6.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 36(2): 133-138, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052725

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: When assessing the economic value of vaccines, decision makers should adopt a full societal perspective. One approach for estimation of the fiscal impact of a disease is to use the human capital method to determine productivity losses. The aim of this study was to test an analytical framework developed for the estimation of the fiscal impacts of vaccination programs for influenza (FLU), pneumococcus (PC), and herpes zoster (HZ), in Italy. METHODS: We tested the framework in a two-stage analysis. First, we estimated the fiscal impact of the disease, second we performed a cost-benefit analysis of the individual benefits of vaccination against the cost of the vaccine. To estimate the fiscal impact of the diseases, the human capital approach was used. Epidemiological data were extrapolated from the literature. A Monte Carlo simulation enabled exploration of the uncertainty in the model variables. RESULTS: For FLU, assuming 2.1 million people infected, the total expected impact was EUR 999,371,520; the estimated fiscal impact was EUR 159,563,520. For PC, assuming 90,000 people infected, the total impact was EUR 148,055,040 and the estimated fiscal impact was EUR 23,639,040. For HZ, assuming 6,400 people infected, the total impact was EUR 4,777,200, with EUR 630,000 resulting from a decrease in fiscal taxation. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our work shows how traditional methods aimed at estimating the cost of illness from a social perspective can be improved by additionally considering the fiscal impact, which accounts for the decrease in fiscal revenues due to illness.


Subject(s)
Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Influenza Vaccines/economics , Pneumococcal Vaccines/economics , Adult , Aged , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Herpes Zoster/economics , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Humans , Immunization Programs/economics , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/economics , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Econometric , Pneumococcal Infections/economics , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage
7.
Pain ; 161(2): 361-368, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31599852

ABSTRACT

Our objective was to develop comprehensive national estimates of the total burden of herpes zoster (HZ) among U.S. adults, including direct (ie, medical costs) and indirect (ie, productivity losses) costs, as well as its psychosocial impact (ie, quality of life losses). Using a patient-level microsimulation model, we projected health and economic outcomes among U.S. adults aged 18 years and older using a 10-year time horizon. We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review to generate parameter values and conducted simulation modeling to generate our outcomes, including numbers of cases of uncomplicated HZ, postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and ocular complications, productivity losses, and losses in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We used a societal perspective for outcomes; the costing year was 2015. Projected outcomes for an unvaccinated population included 1.1 million HZ cases, 114,000 PHN cases, and 43,000 ocular complications annually, resulting in approximately 67,000 QALYs lost. HZ and its complications would incur costs of $2.4 billion in direct medical costs and productivity losses annually. Projected QALY losses were most sensitive to HZ and PHN health utility values in the model. Cost estimates were most sensitive to the probability of HZ and to the costs per episode of PHN. The national burden of direct, indirect, and psychosocial HZ costs is substantial. Our results can inform economic analyses for HZ vaccines. Comprehensive, national assessments of the total burden of other painful conditions would be very informative.


Subject(s)
Efficiency , Health Care Costs , Herpes Zoster/economics , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/economics , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Computer Simulation , Female , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster/physiopathology , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus/economics , Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus/physiopathology , Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/epidemiology , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/physiopathology , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/prevention & control , United States , Young Adult
8.
CMAJ ; 191(34): E932-E939, 2019 08 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31451524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two vaccines against herpes zoster are currently authorized for use in Canada: the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine and live attenuated zoster vaccine. We compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these 2 vaccines. METHODS: We used a decision analytic static cohort model parametrized with Canadian epidemiologic and economic data. We performed the economic analysis from the health care system perspective, using a lifetime horizon and a 3% discount rate for costs and benefits. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, relative to no vaccination. We ran 30 000 simulations varying all model parameters, including vaccine costs, efficacy and waning. RESULTS: The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) was higher for the live attenuated zoster vaccine than for the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine for all herpes zoster-related events at all ages. For example, in persons exactly 65 years old, for herpes zoster, median NNV was 21 (90% uncertainty interval [UI] 13-31) versus 8 (90% UI 6-18), and for postherpetic neuralgia, NNV was 64 (90% UI 33-93) versus 31 (90% UI 23-73). For the recombinant vaccine, the median cost-effectiveness ratios varied between cost-saving and $25 881 per QALY gained for adults aged 50 years or older. For the live vaccine, the cost-effectiveness ratios varied between cost-saving and $130 587 per QALY gained and were less than $45 000 per QALY gained only for those 65 to 75 years old. Given its higher efficacy, we estimated that the cost for the complete series of the recombinant vaccine could be $150 to $200 more than the cost of the live vaccine and still be considered cost-effective. INTERPRETATION: Our model predicted that the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine is likely cost-effective in Canada for adults 60 years or older, and is likely more cost-effective than live attenuated zoster vaccine. These results have informed updated national and provincial recommendations on herpes zoster vaccination.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Mass Vaccination/economics , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Decision Support Techniques , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/therapeutic use , Humans , Middle Aged , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/epidemiology , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/prevention & control , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Vaccines, Attenuated/economics , Vaccines, Synthetic/economics
10.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 17(5): 723-732, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31250218

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In Canada, incidences of herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) are increasing, posing a significant burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to determine the public health impact and cost effectiveness of an adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) compared to no vaccination and to the live attenuated vaccine (ZVL) in Canadians aged 60 years and older. METHODS: A multi-cohort Markov model has been adapted to the Canadian context using recent demographic and epidemiologic data. Simulations consisted of age-cohorts annually transitioning between health states. Health outcomes and costs were discounted at 1.5% per year. The perspective of the Canadian healthcare payer was adopted. A coverage of 80% for the first RZV and ZVL dose and a compliance of 75% for the second RZV dose were assumed. RESULTS: RZV was estimated to be cost effective compared with no vaccination with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $28,360 (Canadian dollars) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in persons aged ≥ 60 years, avoiding 554,504 HZ and 166,196 PHN cases. Compared with ZVL, RZV accrued more QALYs through the remaining lifetime and an increase in costs of approximately $50 million resulting in an average ICER of $2396. Results were robust under deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. HZ incidence rate and persistence of vaccine efficacy had the largest impact on cost effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-utility analysis suggested that RZV would be cost effective in the Canadian population compared with no vaccination and vaccination with ZVL at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000.


More than 95% of adults aged 50 are infected with varicella-zoster virus and are at risk of developing herpes zoster, also known as shingles. This risk is higher in older people and in people with a reduced immune system. Shingles causes a painful rash and may trigger persistent pain and other complications that greatly reduce quality of life. In Canada, Zostavax is the only existing approved vaccine against shingles. It has been offered in a publicly funded program in Ontario to those aged 65­70 years since September 2016. Shingrix, is a new shingles vaccine that has recently been approved by Health Canada for adults aged ≥ 50 years. The present model suggests that Shingrix confers higher protection against shingles compared to Zostavax, with a greater reduction in shingles episodes. The increase in vaccination costs would be partially offset by reduced healthcare visit and medication expenses. For these reasons, provincial health plans may consider offering Shingrix to people aged ≥ 50 years.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/prevention & control , Vaccines, Attenuated/economics , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/epidemiology
11.
Am J Prev Med ; 57(2): 180-190, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31248743

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Financial concerns are frequently cited by providers as a barrier to adult vaccination. This study assessed insurance reimbursements to providers for administering vaccines to adults in the private sector. METHODS: This study, conducted in 2018, used the 2016 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database and included vaccination visits made by adults aged 19-64 years. Four routinely recommended vaccines targeted at adults were included: tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap); tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td); zoster; and influenza. The mean reimbursements for vaccine purchase and administration were reported and examined by state, metropolitan statistical area, provider type, and insurance plan type. Using the private vaccine purchase price published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the study reported the proportion of vaccination visits receiving reimbursements above the CDC-published price. RESULTS: The mean vaccine administration reimbursement was $25.80 for the first dose and $14.71 for additional doses in the same visit. The mean vaccine purchase reimbursement was $44.15 for Tdap, $25.78 for Td, and $216.05 for the zoster vaccine; the unweighted mean for the four examined influenza vaccines was $17.25. Reimbursements varied widely by state. Vaccine reimbursements exceeded the CDC-published price for most visits where Tdap (71.4%), zoster (87.8%), and three of four influenza (61.5%-88.5%) vaccines were administered but only for 25.8% of visits where Td was given. CONCLUSIONS: On average, reimbursements for administering vaccines to privately insured adults were adequate for most private practices. However, providers' financial concerns may vary across geographic locations.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus Vaccine/economics , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/economics , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Influenza Vaccines/economics , Insurance Claim Review , Private Sector , Vaccination , Adult , Databases, Factual , Diphtheria-Tetanus Vaccine/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Insurance Claim Review/economics , Insurance Claim Review/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , United States
12.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(9): 2217-2226, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30785363

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated physician practices and perceived barriers for influenza, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (Tdap), and zoster vaccination of adults in the United States (US), with emphasis on patients with Medicare versus commercial insurance. A cross-sectional internet-based survey of board-certified general/family practitioners and internists (N = 1,000) recruited from a national US physician panel was conducted in May 2017. For influenza, rates of physician recommendation (84% of Medicare patients, 82% of commercially-insured patients), administration (80% Medicare, 78% commercial), and referral (11% Medicare, 11% commercial) were similar regardless of insurance type. Tdap recommendation was higher for commercial compared to Medicare patients (59% vs. 54%, p < 0.001); while zoster recommendation was higher for Medicare patients than commercial (59% vs. 55%, p < 0.001). For Tdap and zoster, higher administration rates were reported in commercial patients (64% Tdap, 36% zoster) than Medicare (56% Tdap, 32% zoster), and referral rates were higher for Medicare patients (19% Tdap, 49% zoster) than commercial (14% Tdap, 42% zoster). Over 40% of physicians would be much more likely to administer Tdap and zoster vaccines if they were covered under Medicare Part B, with more physicians indicating financial barriers as "major" or "moderate" for Medicare than commercial patients. These differences may be related to financial barriers associated with adult vaccinations that are covered under Medicare Part D and involve patient out-of-pocket costs. Efforts to reduce financial barriers associated with adult vaccinations covered under Medicare Part D and to improve patient and physician knowledge could positively impact physician recommendation, administration, and referral for adult vaccination in the US.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Medicare , Patients/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diphtheria Toxoid/administration & dosage , Diphtheria Toxoid/economics , Female , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/economics , Insurance, Health/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Physicians , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tetanus Toxoid/administration & dosage , Tetanus Toxoid/economics , United States , Vaccination/economics , Young Adult
13.
Ann Intern Med ; 170(6): 380-388, 2019 03 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30776797

ABSTRACT

Background: The U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recently developed recommendations for use of a new recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with RZV compared with zoster vaccine live (ZVL) and no vaccination, the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with RZV for persons who have previously received ZVL, and the cost-effectiveness of preferential vaccination with RZV over ZVL. Design: Simulation (state-transition) model using U.S. epidemiologic, clinical, and cost data. Data Sources: Published data. Target Population: Hypothetical cohort of immunocompetent U.S. adults aged 50 years or older. Time Horizon: Lifetime. Perspective: Societal and health care sector. Intervention: Vaccination with RZV (recommended 2-dose regimen), vaccination with ZVL, and no vaccination. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results of Base-Case Analysis: For vaccination with RZV compared with no vaccination, ICERs ranged by age from $10 000 to $47 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), using a societal perspective and assuming 100% completion of the 2-dose RZV regimen. For persons aged 60 years or older, ICERs were less than $60 000 per QALY. Vaccination with ZVL was dominated by vaccination with RZV for all age groups 60 years or older. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Results were most sensitive to changes in vaccine effectiveness, duration of protection, herpes zoster incidence, and probability of postherpetic neuralgia. Vaccination with RZV after previous administration of ZVL yielded an ICER of less than $60 000 per QALY for persons aged 60 years or older. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, RZV remained the preferred strategy in at least 95% of simulations, including those with 50% completion of the second dose. Limitation: Few data were available on risk for serious adverse events, adherence to the recommended 2-dose regimen, and probability of recurrent zoster. Conclusion: Vaccination with RZV yields cost-effectiveness ratios lower than those for many recommended adult vaccines, including ZVL. Results are robust over a wide range of plausible values. Primary Funding Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Subject(s)
Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/prevention & control , Vaccination/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Epidemiologic Research Design , Health Policy , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/adverse effects , Humans , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Secondary Prevention , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/economics
14.
Vaccine ; 37(9): 1194-1201, 2019 02 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30683507

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccination coverage rates for older adults are low. To better understand utilization of Medicare vaccination benefits we examined a retrospective cohort of more than 26 million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries age 65 years and older from 2014 to 2017. METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression was used to obtain marginal effects (ME) describing the association between patient-level characteristics and the likelihood of vaccination. Vaccines routinely recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices-seasonal influenza, 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate, and herpes zoster vaccines-were examined. Variables considered include demographics (e.g., age, sex, race), use of preventive services, frailty indicators, and co-morbidities. RESULTS: The mean beneficiary age (SD) for each vaccine examined-seasonal influenza (2016-2017), pneumococcal, and herpes zoster-was 75.0 (7.9) years, 74.5 (7.5) years, 74.5 (7.4) years respectively; and 43.7%, 43.2%, and 39.5% were males respectively. Adjusted marginal effects showed that Black beneficiaries were less likely to receive any of the three vaccines compared to White beneficiaries, while North American Native beneficiaries were most likely to receive a pneumococcal vaccine. Trends by race and sex were similar across all ages. Beneficiaries utilizing preventive services, particularly cardiovascular disease screening (ME of 13.8%, 15.6% and 1.5% for influenza, pneumococcal and herpes zoster vaccine respectively), other vaccinations, and the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (ME of 9.8%, 15.3% and 0.4% respectively) were predictors of vaccination for all three vaccines. For herpes zoster vaccines, beneficiaries in rural settings (ME of 1.0%) and those who are dual-eligible for Medicare and Medicaid insurance (ME of 1.7%) were more likely to receive herpes zoster vaccine than beneficiaries in urban settings and those not dual-eligible, respectively. CONCLUSION: Medicare beneficiaries of certain demographic with selected comorbid conditions are less likely to receive routinely-recommended vaccines. Strategies and interventions can target such sub-populations of Medicare beneficiaries by optimizing the utilization of preventive services.


Subject(s)
Fee-for-Service Plans , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Coverage/economics , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/economics , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pneumococcal Vaccines/economics , Population Health/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , United States
16.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(4): 765-771, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30625011

ABSTRACT

Zoster Vaccine Live (ZVL) is marketed in the US since 2008, and a non-live adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) was approved in 2017. Literature suggests that waning of ZVL efficacy may necessitate additional vaccination. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended vaccination with RZV in immunocompetent adults aged 50+ years old, including those previously vaccinated with ZVL. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating US adults aged 60+ years old, previously vaccinated with ZVL. The ZOster ecoNomic Analysis (ZONA) model, a deterministic Markov model, was adapted to follow a hypothetical 1 million(M)-person cohort of US adults previously vaccinated with ZVL. Model inputs included demographics, epidemiology, vaccine characteristics, utilities and costs. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were presented over the lifetimes of the cohort from the year of additional vaccination, discounted 3% annually. The model estimated that, vaccination with RZV 5 years after previous vaccination with ZVL, would reduce disease burden compared with no additional vaccination, resulting in a gain of 1,633 QALYs at a total societal cost of $96M (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: $58,793/QALY saved). Compared with revaccinating with ZVL, vaccination with RZV would result in a gain of 1,187 QALYs and societal cost savings of almost $84M. Sensitivity, scenario, and threshold analyses demonstrated robustness of these findings. Vaccination with RZV is predicted to be cost-effective relative to no additional vaccination, assuming a threshold of $100,000/QALY, and cost-saving relative to ZVL revaccination of US adults aged 60+ years old who have been previously vaccinated with ZVL.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Vaccination/economics , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Age Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Male , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , United States , Vaccines, Synthetic/economics
17.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(1): 34-44, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30130448

ABSTRACT

Each year, around 300,000 Herpes Zoster (HZ) cases are observed in the German population, resulting in costs over €182 million to society. The objective of this study was to estimate the potential public health and economic impact of the new Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV, Shingrix) in the German population ≥ 60 years of age (YOA) and to identify the optimal age of vaccination. We used a static, multi-cohort Markov model that followed a hypothetical cohort of 1 million people ≥ 60 YOA life-long after vaccination using German-specific inputs. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at 3%, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated based on the societal perspective. The coverage of RZV was set at 40% with a second-dose compliance of 70%. Vaccinating the population aged ≥ 60 YOA would result in 45,000 HZ cases avoided, 1,713 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained at a total cost of approximately €63 million compared to 38,000 cases avoided, 1,545 QALYs gained at a total cost of approximately €68 million in the population ≥ 70 YOA. This would result in an ICER of approximately €37,000 and €44,000/QALY, for the age cohort ≥ 60 and ≥ 70 YOA, respectively. Scenario analyses demonstrated that vaccinating at age 60 or 65 YOA would show greater public health impact and would result in the lowest observed ICER compared to vaccinating at 70 YOA. In conclusion, starting vaccination with RZV in the German population ≥ 60 YOA would demonstrate the best value from a public health and economic standpoint.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Vaccination/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Humans , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/epidemiology , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/prevention & control , Public Health , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Vaccines, Synthetic/economics
18.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 37(2): 169-200, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30367401

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster (HZ) is one of the most common diseases among adults. Its reactivation is characterized by a severe and painful complication. In addition to the existing herpes zoster vaccine (ZVL), the FDA approved a new adjuvanted subunit zoster vaccine (RZV) in 2017 for use in adults aged 50 years and older. Several studies have assessed the cost-effectiveness of ZVL, many of which were conducted before the long-term vaccine  efficacy data was available in 2014. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to (i) summarize and compare the cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of ZVL conducted before and after 2014, (ii) summarize the CEAs of RZV, and (iii) critically assess the cost-effectiveness models and identify key parameters to consider for future CEAs of RZV. METHODS: We searched PubMed and two other databases from inception to March 2018 for original cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, or cost-benefit analyses of HZ vaccines. Three investigators independently reviewed and assessed full-text articles after screening the titles and abstracts to determine eligibility. For all included studies, we assessed study quality using the Drummond and Jefferson's checklist and extracted study characteristics, model structure, vaccine characteristics, incidence of HZ and complications, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and sensitivity analyses. We summarized data by type of vaccine, year of publication, and funding sources. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies met eligibility criteria. All studies were from high-income countries and were of moderate-to-high or high quality. Twenty studies repeatedly used four cost-effectiveness models. The assumption on long-term efficacy of ZVL was not based on clinical trial data in > 50% of studies. Fifteen out of 25 studies concluded that ZVL was cost-effective compared with no vaccine at a vaccine price ranging between US$93 and US$236 per dose (2018 US$), 40% of which were published after 2014. All industry-funded studies favored the use of ZVL. The single study assessing RZV found it to be more effective and less costly than ZVL, and cost-effective compared with no vaccination. More studies conducted after 2014 included various efficacy endpoints for ZVL, adverse reactions, and productivity loss compared with those conducted before 2014. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of studies of ZVL found it to be cost-effective compared with no vaccine using the authors' chosen willingness-to-pay thresholds. RZV was dominant in the single study comparing the two vaccines, but the finding needs to be confirmed with further studies in different settings. Future studies should assume vaccine efficacy in line with clinical data, account for more efficacy endpoints for ZVL, and include other HZ long-term complications, vaccine adverse reactions, and productivity loss.


Subject(s)
Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Vaccination/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster/economics , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Vaccination/economics
19.
BMC Med ; 16(1): 228, 2018 12 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30518427

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The newly registered adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine (HZ/su) has a higher efficacy than the available live-attenuated vaccine (ZVL). National decision-makers soon need to decide whether to introduce HZ/su or to prefer HZ/su above ZVL. METHODS: Using a Markov model with a decision tree, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination with HZ/su (two doses within 2 months) or zoster vaccine live (ZVL) (single dose, or single dose with a booster after 10 years) for cohorts of 50-, 60-, 70- or 80-year-olds in the Netherlands. The model was parameterized using vaccine efficacy data from randomized clinical trials and up-to-date incidence, costs and health-related quality of life data from national datasets. We used a time horizon of 15 years, and the analysis was conducted from the societal perspective. RESULTS: At a coverage of 50%, vaccination with two doses of HZ/su was estimated to prevent 4335 to 10,896 HZ cases, depending on the cohort age. In comparison, this reduction was estimated at 400-4877 for ZVL and 427-6466 for ZVL with a booster. The maximum vaccine cost per series of HZ/su to remain cost-effective to a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained ranged from €109.09 for 70-year-olds to €63.68 for 50-year-olds. The cost-effectiveness of ZVL changed considerably by age, with corresponding maximum vaccine cost per dose ranging from €51.37 for 60-year-olds to €0.73 for 80-year-olds. Adding a ZVL booster after 10 years would require a substantial reduction of the maximum cost per dose to remain cost-effective as compared to ZVL single dose. Sensitivity analyses on the vaccine cost demonstrated that there were scenarios in which vaccination with either HZ/su (two doses), ZVL single dose or ZVL + booster could be the most cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy with two doses of HZ/su was superior in reducing the burden of HZ as compared to a single dose or single dose + booster of ZVL. Both vaccines could potentially be cost-effective to a conventional Dutch willingness-to-pay threshold for preventive interventions. However, whether HZ/su or ZVL would be the most cost-effective alternative depends largely on the vaccine cost.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpes Zoster/drug therapy , Vaccines, Attenuated/economics , Adjuvants, Immunologic/pharmacology , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/pharmacology , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Quality of Life , Vaccines, Attenuated/pharmacology , Vaccines, Attenuated/therapeutic use
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30262740

ABSTRACT

There are persistent disparities with regard to receipt of herpes zoster vaccine among elderly blacks, but no data is available regarding the public health or economic impact of these disparities. A decision tree was constructed with multiple Markov nodes in order to estimate the preventable cases of herpes zoster occurring among elderly blacks due to disparities in receipt of herpes zoster vaccine and to quantify the economic costs associated with these disparities. The model was constructed to examine the number of herpes zoster cases occurring among elderly blacks from the age of 60 to 84 over a 20 year period and also calculated costs due to herpes zoster complications and lost productivity. Achievement of health equity would prevent over 34,500 cases of herpes zoster from occurring in the future and avert over $180 million in lost productivity and treatment costs as a result of these cases of herpes zoster. These results help to show that thousands of cases of herpes zoster could be prevented if blacks were vaccinated at the same frequency as whites and help to show the benefit of implementing viable strategies to achieving this goal.


Subject(s)
Black People/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Status Disparities , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Public Health/economics , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Equity , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...