ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Investigate maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with breech presentation in planned community births in the United States, including outcomes associated with types of breech presentation (i.e., frank, complete, footling/kneeling). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of prospective cohort data from a national perinatal data registry (MANA Stats). SETTING: Planned community birth (homes and birth centers), United States. SAMPLE: Individuals with a term, singleton gestation (N = 71,943) planning community birth at labor onset. METHODS: Descriptive statistics to calculate associations between types of breech presentation and maternal and neonatal outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal: intrapartum/postpartum transfer, hospitalization, cesarean, hemorrhage, severe perineal laceration, duration of labor stages and membrane rupture Neonatal: transfer, hospitalization, NICU admission, congenital anomalies, umbilical cord prolapse, birth injury, intrapartum/neonatal death. RESULTS: One percent (n = 695) of individuals experienced breech birth (n = 401, 57.6% vaginally). Most fetuses presented frank breech (57%), with 19% complete, 18% footling/kneeling, and 5% unknown type of breech presentation. Among all breech labors, there were high rates of intrapartum transfer and cesarean birth compared to cephalic presentation (OR 9.0, 95% CI 7.7-10.4 and OR 18.6, 95% CI 15.9-21.7, respectively), with no substantive difference based on parity, planned site of birth, or level of care integration into the health system. For all types of breech presentations, there was increased risk for nearly all assessed neonatal outcomes including hospital transfer, NICU admission, birth injury, and umbilical cord prolapse. Breech presentation was also associated with increased risk of intrapartum/neonatal death (OR 8.5, 95% CI 4.4-16.3), even after congenital anomalies were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: All types of breech presentations in community birth settings are associated with increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. These research findings contribute to informed decision-making and reinforce the need for breech training and research and an increase in accessible, high-quality care for planned vaginal breech birth in US hospitals.
Subject(s)
Breech Presentation , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Breech Presentation/epidemiology , Female , Pregnancy , United States/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Adult , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Birthing Centers/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The debate on the safety and outcomes of home versus hospital births highlights the need for evidence-based evaluations of these birthing settings, particularly in Catalonia where both options are available. AIM: To compare sociodemographic characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes between low-risk women opting for home versus hospital births in Catalonia, Spain. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study analysed 3,463 low-risk births between 2016 and 2018, including 2,713 hospital and 750 home births. Researchers collected sociodemographic data, birthing processes, and outcomes, using statistical analysis to explore differences between the settings. FINDINGS: Notable differences emerged: Women choosing home births typically had higher education levels and were predominantly Spanish. They were 3.43 times more likely to have a spontaneous birth and significantly less likely to undergo instrumental births than those in hospitals. Home births were associated with higher utilization of non-pharmacological analgesia and a more pronounced tendency to iniciate breastfeeding within the first hour post birth and stronger inclination towards breastfeeding. Hospital births, conversely, showed higher use of the lithotomy position and epidural analgesia. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Home births managed by midwives offered better obstetric and neonatal outcomes for low-risk women than hospital births. These results suggest home birth as a safe, viable option that promotes natural birthing processes and reduces medical interventions. The study supports the integration of midwife-led home birth into public health policies, affirming its benefits for maternal and neonatal health.
Subject(s)
Home Childbirth , Midwifery , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Home Childbirth/standards , Home Childbirth/trends , Female , Spain , Pregnancy , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Midwifery/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In Italy, the primary place of birth is typically a hospital, with only a small number of women opting for an out-of-hospital setting. This study details the characteristics of midwifery care and perinatal and maternal outcomes of women who gave birth in an out-of-hospital setting in the Lazio Region, Italy, from 2019 to 2021. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out. The study population included 542 healthy low-risk women who completed the process of planning an out-of-hospital birth, and excluding transfers, this resulted in a total sample of 478 women who gave birth out-of-hospital. Descriptive and inferential analyses and also a logistic regression model were performed. RESULTS: The main outcomes of the out-of-hospital deliveries were: intact perineum in 38.9% of cases, two cases of 3rd degree laceration (0.4%) and in one case (0.2%) episiotomy. Intrapartum emergencies occurred in 85 out of 478 women (17.8%) but only 10 women required a transfer to hospital after delivery. The one minute Apgar score was equal to or greater than 7 in 99.2% of cases. Exclusive breastfeeding of 96% one week after birth and 94.6% one month. Furthermore, having a previous vaginal hospital birth (adjOR 9.7; CI 95% 4.33-21.68 P<0.001) and a previous out-of-hospital birth (adjOR 24.2; CI 95% 3.23-181.48 P=0.002) was associated with the continuation of out-of-hospital birth. CONCLUSIONS: For low-risk pregnant women who have planned an out-of-hospital birth, it has been shown to be a safe, adequate, appropriate, and effective alternative.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Italy/epidemiology , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Young Adult , Midwifery/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Birthing pools are a common feature of maternity units across Europe and North America, and in home birth practice. Despite their prevalence and popularity, these blue or white, often bulky plastic objects have received minimal empirical or theoretical analysis. This article attends to the emergence, design and meaning of such birthing pools, with a focus on the UK in the 1980s and 1990s. Across spheres of media, political and everyday debate, the pools characterise the paradoxes of 'modern maternity': they are 'fluidly' timeless and new, natural and medical, homely and unusual, safe and risky. Beyond exploring the contradictions of 'modern maternity', we also make two key interventions. First, we contend that modern maternity has substantially expanded in recent decades to hold and include additional ideas about comfort and experience. Second, we flag the culturally specific notions of 'modernity' at play in modern births: the popularity of the birthing pool was typically among white, middle-class women. We argue that birthing pools have had an impact at a critical moment in birthing people's care, and we map out the uneven and unjust terrains through which they have assumed cultural and medical prominence.
Subject(s)
Home Childbirth , Humans , United Kingdom , Female , History, 20th Century , Pregnancy , Home Childbirth/history , Birthing Centers/history , Parturition , Delivery, Obstetric/history , CultureABSTRACT
In recent years, the US has seen a significant rise in the rate of planned home births, with a 60â¯% increase from 2016 to 2023, reaching a total of 46,918. This trend positions the US as the leading developed country in terms of home birth prevalence. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) suggests stringent criteria for selecting candidates for home births, but these guidelines have not been adopted by home birth midwives leading to poor outcomes including increased rates of neonatal morbidity and mortality. This paper explores the motivations behind choosing home births in the US despite the known risks. Studies highlight factors such as the desire for a more natural birth experience, previous negative hospital experiences, and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceptions of hospital safety. We provide new insights into why women choose home births by incorporating insights from Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman's theories on decision-making, suggesting that cognitive biases may significantly influence these decisions. Kahneman's work provides a framework for understanding how biases and heuristics can lead to the underestimation of risks and overemphasis on personal birth experiences. We also provide recommendations ("nudges according to Richard Thaler") to help ensure women have access to clear, balanced information about home births. The development of this publication was assisted by OpenAI's ChatGPT-4, which facilitated the synthesis of literature, interpretation of data, and manuscript drafting. This collaboration underscores the potential of integrating advanced computational tools in academic research, enhancing the efficiency and depth of our analyses.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Home Childbirth , Humans , Home Childbirth/psychology , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Patient Preference , Decision Making , United States/epidemiology , Choice Behavior , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
PROBLEM/BACKGROUND: Immersion in water has known benefits, such as reducing pain and shortening the duration of labour. The relationship between waterbirth and perineal injury remains unclear. AIM: To compare the incidence of perineal injury in waterbirth and birth on land among low-risk women. Secondary outcomes were postpartum haemorrhage and 5-minute Apgar scores <7. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 2875 low-risk women who planned a home birth in Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden in 2008-2013 and had a spontaneous vaginal birth without intervention. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed. FINDINGS: A total of 942 women had a waterbirth, and 1933 gave birth on land. The groups differed in their various background variables. Multiparous women had moderately lower rates of intact perineum (59.3% vs. 63.9%) and primiparous women had lower rates of episiotomies (1.1% vs. 4.8%) in waterbirth than in birth on land. No statistically significant differences were detected in adjusted regression analysis on intact perineum in waterbirth (primiparous women's aOR = 1.03, CI 0.68-1.58; multiparous women's aOR = 0.84, CI 0.67-1.05). The rates of sphincter injuries (0.9% vs. 0.6%) were low in both groups. No significant differences were detected in secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: The decreased incidence of intact perineum among multiparous women was modest and inconclusive, and the prevalence of sphincter injury was low. CONCLUSION: Low-risk women contemplating waterbirth should be advised to weigh the risks and benefits detected in this study against previously established benefits of waterbirth and should make an informed choice based on their values.
Subject(s)
Home Childbirth , Natural Childbirth , Obstetric Labor Complications , Perineum , Humans , Female , Perineum/injuries , Pregnancy , Adult , Prospective Studies , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Natural Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Episiotomy/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Parity , Water , Apgar Score , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries/epidemiology , Postpartum Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Norway/epidemiology , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Iceland/epidemiology , Immersion , Lacerations/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Risk Factors , Sweden/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that for low-risk pregnancies, planned home births attended by a skilled health professional in settings where such services are well integrated are associated with lower risk of intrapartum interventions and no increase in adverse health outcomes. Monitoring and updating evidence on the safety of planned home births is necessary to inform ongoing clinical and policy decisions. METHODS: This protocol describes a population-based retrospective cohort study which aims to compare risk of (a) neonatal morbidity and mortality, and (b) maternal outcomes and birth interventions, between people at low obstetrical risk with a planned home birth with a midwife, a planned a hospital birth with a midwife, or a planned hospital birth with a physician. The study population will include Ontario residents who gave birth in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2021. We will use data collected prospectively in a provincial perinatal data registry. The primary outcome will be severe neonatal morbidity or mortality, a composite binary outcome that includes one or more of the following conditions: stillbirth during the intrapartum period, neonatal death (death of a liveborn infant in the first 28 completed days of life), five-minute Apgar score <4, or infant resuscitation requiring cardiac compressions. We will conduct a stratified analysis with three strata: nulliparous, parous-no previous caesarean birth, and parous-prior caesarean birth. To reduce the impact of selection bias in estimating the effect of planned place of birth on neonatal and maternal outcomes, we will use propensity score (PS) overlap weighting (OW) and modified Poisson regression to conduct multivariate analyses.
Subject(s)
Propensity Score , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Ontario/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Infant, Newborn , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Infant , Cohort Studies , Infant Mortality , Apgar ScoreABSTRACT
In this study we explored the relationship between home birth rates and increasing rates of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and manual removal of the placenta (MROP). Data were used from the Dutch national perinatal registry (2000-2014) of women in midwife-led care. Adjusting for place of birth flattened the increasing trends of PPH and MROP. By adjusting for place of birth, the rising trend of MROP among multiparous women disappeared. This suggests that if home birth rates had not declined, PPH and MROP rates might not have increased as much. This study supports policies of enabling women to choose home births.
Subject(s)
Home Childbirth , Midwifery , Postpartum Hemorrhage , Humans , Female , Postpartum Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Adult , Netherlands/epidemiology , Parity , Registries , Placenta , Delivery, Obstetric , Placenta, Retained/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Enquadramento: No âmbito da unidade curricular "Estágio com Relatório," integrada no X Curso de Mestrado em Enfermagem de Saúde Materna e Obstétrica, foi elaborado um relatório final que engloba uma descrição e reflexão acerca da componente de estágio, bem como uma abordagem à componente de investigação. No que concerne à vertente investigativa, o estudo teve como tema o "Parto Domiciliário Planeado em Portugal: Assistência e Desafios na Prática do Enfermeiro Especialista em Enfermagem de Saúde Materna e Obstétrica." Objetivos: Conhecer a prática profissional dos EEESMO em contexto de PDP; identificar as motivações dos EEESMO perante a opção de exercerem em contexto de PDP e descrever os desafios e obstáculos que os EEESMO enfrentaram na sua prática profissional em contexto de PDP. Metodologia: Trata-se de um estudo exploratório e descritivo com abordagem qualitativa. Participaram da pesquisa oito (8) profissionais com cédula profissional EEESMO em Portugal, que atuam em contexto de PDP há pelo menos um ano. Os dados foram coletados por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas, e a análise foi conduzida seguindo a metodologia de análise de conteúdo proposta por Minayo (2007). Resultados: O estudo revelou a experiência profissional das EEESMO em contexto do parto domiciliar planeado. Foram explorados temas relacionados à acessibilidade das utentes ao serviço, medidas de segurança, material clínico para assistência ao parto, emergências e transferência para o hospital, bem como os contributos da entidade reguladora da profissão (Ordem dos Enfermeiros) para a prática profissional nesse contexto. Além disso, foram identificadas as motivações iniciais das participantes que optaram exercer a sua prática profissional no âmbito do parto domiciliar planeado, categorizadas em desejo de infância, desde a formação de EEESMO, experiência do seu parto no domicílio e preferência por um modelo de assistência diferente do hospitalar. No que concerne aos desafios e obstáculos enfrentados pelas participantes no contexto do PDP, ficou evidente que estes são diversos e abrangem várias esferas. Esses desafios foram categorizados nos âmbitos da formação, social, profissional e pessoal. Conclusão: Conclui-se que os desafios expostos pelas participantes revelam a complexidade do trabalho no contexto do PDP, ressaltando a importância de promover mudanças nesse contexto. A superação desses desafios contribuirá para uma prática mais segura, valorizada e efetiva no cuidado às mulheres e seus bebés durante o parto domiciliário. Considera-se que este estudo contribui de forma significativa para enriquecer a reflexão e o debate em torno desse tema, especialmente no meio acadêmico, ao estimular o desenvolvimento de estudos aprofundados relacionados à assistência das EEESMO no contexto do PDP.
Subject(s)
Child Health Services , Women's Health , Planning , Maternal Health , Nurse Specialists , Home Childbirth , Nurse Midwives , Obstetric NursingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in attitudes and expectations of labor over the previous six decades, comparing the Iraqi generation who labored at home without medical assistance with their descendants. STUDY DESIGN: We used semi-structured telephone interviews with 22 women across three generations of one extended family living and giving birth in Iraq between the 1950s and the 2010s. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using open, axial, and selective coding. RESULTS: Each generation experienced a paradigm shift in childbirth, from exclusive home births to hospital-directed maternity care, to a trend that favors planned cesarean birth, driven by generation-specific changes in outlook. Emerging themes included social influences, changing technology, and medical professionals' recommendations; all of these affected attitudes toward childbirth and pregnancy. There were generational disconnects in perceptions concerning the reasons childbirth has changed over the past 60 years, with the youngest generation citing wider pressures regarding body image and marital relationships as two of the factors affecting preferences in childbirth options. CONCLUSIONS: Societal changes and availability of healthcare services affect women's choices and experiences of childbirth. To be successful, efforts to improve women's experiences in labor, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes, must consider these wider sociocultural issues.
Subject(s)
Parturition , Humans , Female , Iraq , Pregnancy , Adult , Parturition/psychology , Qualitative Research , Delivery, Obstetric/psychology , Interviews as Topic , Young Adult , Cesarean Section/psychology , Home Childbirth/psychology , Middle Aged , Labor, Obstetric/psychology , Attitude to HealthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Utilization of skilled birth attendance during home delivery of pregnant women is proven to reduce complications during and after childbirth. Though the utilization of skilled birth attendance (SBA) during home delivery has increased significantly in recent times, the rate of utilizing skilled birth attendance is still low in several regions across India. The objective of this study is to analyze the prevalence and to identify the determinants of the utilization of skilled birth attendance during home delivery of pregnant women in India. METHODS: To conduct this study, data and information from the Indian Demographic and Health Survey 2015-16 have been utilized. The sample size for this study is a weighted sample of 41,171 women. The sample consisted of women who had given a live birth in the three years preceding the survey. For women with more than one child, only the first live birth was considered. The binary logistic regression model and the log-binary logistic regression analysis have been applied as the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals for identifying the determinants of home-based skilled birth attendance during delivery. That allows us to select the most appropriate model for our study objective by ensuring that the determinants of skilled birth attendance for home delivery are accurately assessed based on the characteristics of the data. RESULTS: The analyses show that only 18.8% of women had utilized skilled birth attendance during delivery. Women residing in urban areas are more likely to utilize skilled birth attendance during home delivery (AOR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.08-1.20). Women having higher education levels are associated with increased use of SBA during home delivery (AOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.04-1.28). Exposure to media is associated with increased utilization of SBA (AOR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.11-1.23). Overweight women are also more likely to avail the SBA during home delivery (AOR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03-1.19). Women belonging to affluent households have higher odds of utilizing skilled birth attendance (AOR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.33-1.49). Having 3+ tetanus injections is associated with the utilization of SBA (AOR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.43-1.69). Women having 4+ antenatal care visits were more likely to utilize SBA (AOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.71-1.92). Women belonging to the Hindu religion were 1.12 times more likely to utilize SBA (AOR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.07-1.18). Women with 1 to 3 birth orders were 1.40 times more likely to utilize skilled birth attendance during home delivery (AOR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.30-1.51). CONCLUSION: The percentage of women utilizing skilled birth attendance during home delivery is still very low which is a matter of serious concern. Several factors have been found to be associated with the utilization of SBA during home delivery in India. As skilled birth attendance has significant positive health outcomes for pregnant women and newborns, efforts to increase the rate of SBA utilization during home delivery should be undertaken.
Subject(s)
Home Childbirth , Maternal Health Services , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Delivery, Obstetric , Family Characteristics , India , Pregnant Women , Prenatal Care , PrevalenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bangladesh has achieved remarkable progress in reducing maternal mortality, yet postpartum deaths remain a significant issue. Emphasis on quality postnatal care (qPNC) is crucial, as increased coverage alone has not sufficiently reduced maternal morbidity and mortality. METHODS: This study included data from the Bangladesh Maternal Mortality Survey of 32,106 mothers who delivered within three years prior to the survey. Descriptive statistics were used to report coverage and components of postnatal care stratified by covariates. Log-linear regression models were used to assess the determinants of quality postnatal care among facility and home births. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2016, postnatal care coverage within 48 h of delivery by a qualified provider rose from 23% to 47%. Of the births, 94% were facility births that received timely PNC, contrasted with only 6% for home births. Despite the increased coverage, quality of care remained as low as 1% for home births and 13% for facility births. Key factors affecting qPNC utilization included socio-demographic factors, pregnancy complications, type of birth attendant, delivery method, and financial readiness. CONCLUSION: Importantly, deliveries assisted by skilled birth attendants correlated with higher quality postnatal care. This study reveals a significant gap between the coverage and quality of postnatal care in rural Bangladesh, especially for home births. It underscores the need for targeted interventions to enhance qPNC.
Subject(s)
Home Childbirth , Maternal Health Services , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Postnatal Care , Bangladesh/epidemiology , MothersABSTRACT
AbstractThe assumption in current U.S. mainstream medicine is that birthing requires hospitalization. In fact, while the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports the right of every birthing person to make a medically informed decision about their delivery, they do not recommend home birth owing to data indicating greater neonatal morbidity and mortality. In this article, we examine the evidence surrounding home birth in the United States and its current limitations, as well as the ethical considerations around birth setting.
Subject(s)
Home Childbirth , Pregnancy , Female , Infant, Newborn , United States , Humans , HospitalizationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine how demographic and clinical predictors of home birth have changed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. METHODS: Using National Vital Statistics birth certificate data, a retrospective population-based cohort study was performed with planned home births and hospital births among women age ≥18 years during calendar years 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2021 (pandemic-era). Birth location (planned home birth vs. hospital birth) was analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression, systematically examining the interaction of each demographic and clinical covariate with study year. RESULTS: After exclusions, a total of 6,087,768 birth records were retained for analysis, with the proportion of home births increasing from 0.82â¯% in 2019 to 1.24â¯% in 2021 (p<0.001). In the final multivariable logistic regression model of planned home birth, five demographic variables retained a statistically significant interaction with year: race and ethnicity, age, educational attainment, parity, and WIC participation. In each case, demographic differences between those having planned home births and hospital births became smaller (odds ratios closer to 1) in 2021 compared to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Planned home births increased by more than 50â¯% during the pandemic, with greater socioeconomic diversity in the pandemic-era home birth cohort. The presence of clinical risk factors remained a strong predictor of hospital birth, with no evidence that pandemic-era home births had a higher clinical risk profile as compared to the pre-pandemic period.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Home Childbirth , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Home Childbirth/adverse effects , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Public interest in home birth in the United States increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Midwives attend the vast majority of home births and are experts in providing home birth care. However, limited data are available about the experiences of midwives attending home births during the pandemic in the United States. METHODS: We developed a cross-sectional survey comprising 34 questions, which included 5 open-ended questions. The survey was distributed online in June 2021 to midwives attending home birth in Massachusetts. We calculated descriptive statistics for the quantitative survey responses and identified qualitative free-text responses illustrating the results. RESULTS: Eighteen midwives and 2 midwife apprentices responded to the survey, approximately 50% of Massachusetts' total number of midwives known to attend homebirths. The majority of the 20 respondents reported an increase in public interest in home birth (n = 17) and higher caseloads (n = 14) since the start of the pandemic. Respondents reported an increase in the number of clients transferring to their practices at a later gestational age (n = 13) and who identified as people of color (n = 8). They described both better and worse transfer of care to hospital experiences. Work-life balance and unpredictable income were the top 2 reported obstacles to home birth practice. DISCUSSION: The results of our study indicate that midwives providing home birth care in Massachusetts witnessed a surge in demand for their services during the pandemic. Implementing policies and practices that provide support for certified professional midwives could strengthen the home birth workforce, enhance access to home birth options, and optimize transfers to hospital settings when necessary.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Home Childbirth , Midwifery , Nurse Midwives , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , United States , Midwifery/methods , Pandemics , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Massachusetts/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report the utilisation of maternal healthcare services and factors associated with adequate antenatal care and institutional childbirths among mothers in the tribal communities from nine districts in India. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected from 2636 tribal women who had a childbirth experience in the past 12 months. Socio-demographic, maternal healthcare services and health system-related details were collected. Multiple logistic regression analyses were done to identify factors associated with adequate antenatal care (receiving at least four antenatal care visits, the first visit being in the first trimester and receiving a minimum of 100 iron-folic acid tablets) and institutional childbirth (mother giving birth in a health facility). RESULTS: Only 23% of the mothers received adequate antenatal care. 82% were institutional childbirths. The logistic regression revealed that particularly vulnerable tribal groups (PVTGs), those lacking all-weather roads, and women of advanced age were at risk of inadequate antenatal care. Mother's education, health worker's home visits during pregnancy and reception of advice on antenatal care were significantly associated with the reception of adequate antenatal care. Having all-weather roads, and education of the mother and head of the household were positively associated with institutional childbirths, whereas PVTGs, children of birth order three or above, and working mothers were more likely to give childbirth at home. CONCLUSION: PVTGs are at risk of foregoing adequate antenatal care and are more likely to give childbirth at home. Having all-weather roads is a strong correlate of adequate maternal care. Outreach activities by the health workers are to be strengthened as they are positively and significantly associated with the reception of adequate antenatal care. Investing in education and other social determinants and addressing certain socio-cultural practices is important to improve maternal health.
Subject(s)
Home Childbirth , Prenatal Care , Child , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Services Accessibility , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Health FacilitiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite strong evidence of benefits and increasing consumer demand for homebirth, Australia has failed to effectively upscale it. To promote the adoption and expansion of homebirth in the public health care system, policymakers require quantifiable results to evaluate its economic value. To date, there has been limited evaluation of the financial impact of birth settings for women at low risk of pregnancy complications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the difference in inpatient costs around birth between offering homebirth in the public maternity system versus not offering public homebirth to selected women who meet low-risk pregnancy criteria. METHODS: We used a whole-of-population linked administrative dataset containing all women who gave birth in Queensland (one Australian State) between 01/07/2012 and 30/06/2018 where publicly funded homebirth is not currently offered. We created a static microsimulation model to compare the inpatient cost difference for mother and baby around birth based on the women who gave birth between 01/07/2017 and 30/06/2018 (n = 36,314). The model comprised of a base model - representing standard public hospital care, and a counterfactual model - representing a hypothetical scenario where 5 % of women who gave birth in public hospitals planned to give birth at home prior to the onset of labour (n = 1816). Costs were reported in 2021/22 AUD. RESULTS: In our hypothetical scenario, after considering the effect of assumptive place and mode of birth for these planned homebirths, the estimated State-level inpatient cost saving around birth (summed for mother and babies) per pregnancy were: AU$303.13 (to Queensland public hospitals) and AU$186.94 (to Queensland public hospital funders). This calculates to a total cost saving per annum of AU$11 million (to Queensland public hospitals) and AU$6.8 million (to Queensland public hospital funders). CONCLUSION: A considerable amount of inpatient health care costs around birth could be saved if 5 % of women booked at their local public hospitals, planned to give birth at home through a public-funded homebirth program. This finding supports the establishment and expansion of the homebirth option in the public health care system.
Subject(s)
Home Childbirth , Labor, Obstetric , Midwifery , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Australia , QueenslandABSTRACT
Increasingly, pregnant people in the United States are choosing to give at birth at home, and certified professional midwives (CPMs) often attend these births. Care by midwives, including home birth midwives, has the potential to decrease unnecessary medical interventions and their associated health care costs, as well as to improve maternal satisfaction with care. However, lack of integration into the health care system affects the ability of CPMs to access standard medications and testing for their clients, including prenatal screening. Genetics and genomics are now a routine part of prenatal screening, and genetic testing can contribute to identifying candidates for planned home birth. However, research on genetics and midwifery care has not, to date, included the subset of midwives who attend the majority of planned home births, CPMs. The purpose of this study was to examine CPMs' access to, and perspectives on, one aspect of prenatal care, genetic counselors and genetic counseling services. Using semi-structured interviews and a modified grounded theory approach to narrative analysis, we identified three key themes: (1) systems-level issues with accessing information about genetic counseling and genetic testing; (2) practice-level patterns in information delivery and self-awareness about knowledge limitations; and (3) client-level concerns about the value of genetic testing relative to difficulties with access and stress caused by the information. The results of this study can be used to develop decision aids that include information about genetic testing and genetic counseling access for pregnant people intending home births in the United States.
Subject(s)
Genetic Counseling , Genetic Testing , Grounded Theory , Midwifery , Humans , Female , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Pregnancy , Vermont , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Middle Aged , Counselors/psychology , Interviews as Topic , Nurse Midwives/psychology , Prenatal Care , Home Childbirth/psychology , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, in its opinion of the Committee on Midwifery Practice, points out that planned home birth is a woman's and family's right to experience, but also to choose and be informed about, their baby's place of birth. The aim of this study was to understand obstetric nurses' perceptions of planned home childbirth care within the framework of the Brazilian obstetric model. METHOD: A qualitative study, with Snowball Sampling recruitment, totaling 20 obstetric nurses through semi-structured interviews between September 2022 and January 2023, remotely, using the Google Meet application and the recording feature. After the data had been collected, the material was transcribed in full and subjected to content analysis in the thematic modality with the support of ATLAS.ti 8.0 software. RESULTS: Obstetric care at home emerged as a counterpoint to hospital care and the biomedical model, providing care at home based on scientific evidence and humanization, bringing qualified information as a facilitator of access and financial costs as an obstacle to effective home birth. CONCLUSION: Understanding obstetric nurses' perceptions of planned home birth care in the context of the Brazilian obstetric model shows the need for progress as a public policy and for strategies to ensure quality and regulation.