Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 888
Filter
1.
Wound Repair Regen ; 32(4): 487-499, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845416

ABSTRACT

Pressure injuries are a significant comorbidity and lead to increased overall healthcare costs. Several European and global studies have assessed the burden of pressure injuries; however, no comprehensive analysis has been completed in the United States. In this study, we investigated the trends in the burden of pressure injuries among hospitalised adults in the United States from 2009 to 2019, stratified by sociodemographic subgroups. The length of admission, total cost of hospitalisation, and sociodemographic data was extracted from the National Inpatient Sample provided by the Healthcare Cost and Utilisation Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Overall, the annual prevalence of pressure injuries and annual mean hospitalisation cost increased ($69,499.29 to $102,939.14), while annual mean length of stay decreased (11.14-9.90 days). Among all races, minority groups had higher average cost and length of hospitalisation. Our findings suggest that while the length of hospitalisation is decreasing, hospital costs and prevalence are rising. In addition, differing trends among racial groups exist with decreasing prevalence in White patients. Further studies and targeted interventions are needed to address these differences, as well as discrepancies in racial groups.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/economics , United States/epidemiology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Prevalence , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/trends , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Cost of Illness , Adolescent , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Health Care Costs/trends , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data
2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 35(7): 1351-1359, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695242

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Leadless pacemakers (LPM) have established themselves as the important therapeutic modality in management of selected patients with symptomatic bradycardia. To determine real-world utilization and in-hospital outcomes of LPM implantation since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2016. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2016-2020. The outcomes analyzed in our study included implantation trends of LPM over study years, mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention, any vascular complication, or acute kidney injury), length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. Implantation trends of LPM were assessed using linear regression. Using years 2016-2017 as a reference, adjusted outcomes of mortality, major complications, prolonged length of stay (defined as >6 days), and increased hospitalization cost (defined as median cost >34 098$) were analyzed for subsequent years using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: There was a gradual increased trend of LPM implantation over our study years (3230 devices in years 2016-2017 to 11 815 devices in year 2020, p for trend <.01). The adjusted mortality improved significantly after LPM implantation in subsequent years compared to the reference years 2016-2017 (aOR for the year 2018: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.73; aOR for the year 2019: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.41-0.59; and aOR for the year 2020: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.62). No differences in adjusted rates of major complications were demonstrated over the subsequent years. The adjusted cost of hospitalization was higher for the years 2019 (aOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.22-1.46) and 2020 (aOR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.55-1.84). CONCLUSION: The contemporary US practice has shown significantly increased implantation rates of LPM since its approval with reduced rates of inpatient mortality.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Databases, Factual , Hospital Costs , Length of Stay , Pacemaker, Artificial , Humans , Pacemaker, Artificial/trends , Pacemaker, Artificial/economics , United States , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Hospital Costs/trends , Time Factors , Middle Aged , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/trends , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/economics , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/mortality , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/adverse effects , Length of Stay/trends , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Bradycardia/therapy , Bradycardia/mortality , Bradycardia/diagnosis , Heart Rate , Hospital Mortality/trends , Equipment Design/trends
3.
Health Serv Res ; 59(4): e14329, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804181

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in hospital price disclosures after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Final Rule went into effect. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: The Turquoise Health Price Transparency Dataset was used to identify all US hospitals that publicly displayed pricing from 2021 to 2023. STUDY DESIGN: Price-disclosing versus nondisclosing hospitals were compared using Pearson's Chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Bayesian structural time-series modeling was used to determine if enforcement of increased penalties for nondisclosure was associated with a change in the trend of hospital disclosures. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: As of January 2023, 5162 of 6692 (77.1%) US hospitals disclosed pricing of their services, with the majority (2794 of 5162 [54.1%]) reporting their pricing within the first 6 months of the final rule going into effect in January 2021. An increase in hospital disclosures was observed after penalties for nondisclosure were enforced in January 2022 (relative effect size 20%, p = 0.002). Compared with nondisclosing hospitals, disclosing hospitals had higher annual revenue, bed number, and were more likely to be have nonprofit ownership, academic affiliation, provide emergency services, and be in highly concentrated markets (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital pricing disclosures are continuously in flux and influenced by regulatory and market factors.


Subject(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Disclosure , United States , Humans , Disclosure/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Charges/trends , Bayes Theorem , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/trends
4.
Surgery ; 176(2): 289-294, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38772777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has become an accepted alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement. We examined the trends and predictors in inflation-adjusted costs of transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement. METHODS: National Inpatient Sample identified patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, codes. Hospitalization costs were inflation-adjusted using the Federal Reserve's consumer price index to reflect current valuation. Outcomes of interest were unadjusted trend in annual cost for each procedure and predictors of in-patient cost. Generalized linear models with a log link function identified predictors of adjusted costs. Interaction terms determined where cost predictors were different by operation type. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2019, the mean annual inflation-adjusted cost of surgical aortic valve replacement increased from $62,853 to $63,743, in contrast to decreasing cost of transcatheter aortic valve replacement from $64,913 to $56,042 ($1,854 per year; P = .004). Significant independent predictors of patient-level cost included operation type (transcatheter aortic valve replacement associated with $9,625 increase; P < .001), incidence of in-hospital mortality ($28,836 increase; P < .001), elective status ($2,410 decrease; P < .001), Elixhauser Index ($995 increase; P < .001), and postoperative length of stay ($2,014 per day increase; P < .001). Compared to discharges with Medicare, discharges with private insurance and Medicaid paid $736 less (P = .004) and $1,863 less (P = .01), respectively. Increasing hospital volume was a significant predictor of decreasing patient level cost (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Annual cost of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has decreased significantly and has been a more cost-effective modality compared to surgical aortic valve replacement since 2017. Predictors of patient-level costs allow for mindful preparation of healthcare systems for aortic valve replacement.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Female , Male , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/economics , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/statistics & numerical data , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/trends , Aged , United States , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/economics , Aged, 80 and over , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/economics , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/trends , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/trends , Aortic Valve/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Inflation, Economic
5.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 33(6): 107663, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432489

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is a common cause of mortality in the United States. However, the economic burden of stroke on the healthcare system is not well known. In this study, we aim to calculate the annual cumulative and per-patient cost of stroke. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). We calculate annual trends in cost for stroke patients from 2006 to 2019. A multivariate linear regression with patient characteristics (e.g. age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index) as covariates was used to identify factors for higher costs. RESULTS: In this study time-period, 2,998,237 stroke patients presented to the ED and 2,481,171 (83 %) were admitted. From 2006 to 2019, the cumulative ED cost increased by a factor of 7.0 from 0.49 ± 0.03 to 3.91 ± 0.16 billion dollars (p < 0.001). The cumulative inpatient (IP) cost increased by a factor of 2.7 from 14.42 ± 0.78 to 37.06 ± 2.26 billion dollars (p < 0.001. Per-patient ED charges increased by a factor of 3.0 from 1950 ± 64 to 7818 ± 260 dollars (p < 0.001). Per-patient IP charges increased by 89 % from 40.22 +/- 1.12 to 76.06 ± 3.18 thousand dollars (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Strokes place an increasing financial burden on the US healthcare system. Certain patient demographics including age, male gender, more comorbidities, and insurance type were significantly associated with increased cost of care.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospital Costs , Stroke , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Aged , Stroke/economics , Stroke/therapy , Stroke/mortality , Stroke/diagnosis , Time Factors , United States , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Middle Aged , Hospital Costs/trends , Aged, 80 and over , Hospital Charges/trends , Comorbidity , Patient Admission/economics , Patient Admission/trends
6.
Chest ; 166(1): 146-156, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is a lifesaving intervention for people with advanced lung disease, but it is costly and resource-intensive. To investigate the cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation as a treatment option in pulmonary disease, we must understand costs attributable to end-of-life hospitalizations for end-stage lung disease. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the costs associated with end-of-life hospitalizations for people with pulmonary disease, and how have these trends changed over time? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults aged 18 to 74 years with hospitalization data in the Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample data from 2009 to 2019 with a pulmonary disease admission were included in this analysis. Those with a history of lung transplantation were excluded. International Classification of Diseases codes were used to identify pulmonary disease admissions, complications, and procedures and interventions. Total charges were calculated for hospitalizations and stratified by patient status at time of discharge. Trends in charges over time were assessed by demographic and hospital factors. RESULTS: One hundred nine thousand nine hundred twenty-four (4.1%) hospital admissions for pulmonary disease resulted in in-hospital mortality. Those with obstructive lung disease accounted for 94.1% of hospitalizations and 88.1% cases of in-hospital mortality. Estimated costs for end-of-life hospitalizations were $29,981 on average with wide variation in cost by diagnosis and procedure utilization. Inpatient costs were highest for younger people who received more procedures. Among the most expensive admissions, mechanical ventilation accounted for the greatest proportion of interventions. Significant increases in the use of mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and dialysis occurred over the time period. The rate of hospital transfers increased with a proportionately greater increase across admissions resulting in in-hospital mortality. INTERPRETATION: Costs accrued during end-of-life hospitalizations vary across people but represent a significant health care cost that can be averted for selected people who undergo lung transplantation. These costs should be considered in studies of cost-effectiveness in lung transplantation.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Humans , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Adolescent , Terminal Care/economics , Terminal Care/trends , Lung Diseases/economics , Lung Diseases/therapy , Lung Diseases/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality/trends , Young Adult , Lung Transplantation/economics , Lung Transplantation/trends , Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data
7.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0260127, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843530

ABSTRACT

Sepsis, an important and preventable cause of death in the newborn, is associated with high out of pocket hospitalization costs for the parents/guardians. The government of Nepal's Free Newborn Care (FNC) service that covers hospitalization costs has set a maximum limit of Nepalese rupees (NPR) 8000 i.e. USD 73.5, the basis of which is unclear. We aimed to estimate the costs of treatment in neonates and young infants fulfilling clinical criteria for sepsis, defined as clinical severe infection (CSI) to identify determinants of increased cost. This study assessed costs for treatment of 206 infants 3-59 days old, enrolled in a clinical trial, and admitted to the Kanti Children's Hospital in Nepal through June 2017 to December 2018. Total costs were derived as the sum of direct costs for bed charges, investigations, and medicines and indirect costs calculated by using work time loss of parents. We estimated treatment costs for CSI, the proportion exceeding NPR 8000 and performed multivariable linear regression to identify determinants of high cost. Of the 206 infants, 138 (67%) were neonates (3-28 days). The median (IQR) direct costs for treatment of CSI in neonates and young infants (29-59 days) were USD 111.7 (69.8-155.5) and 65.17 (43.4-98.5) respectively. The direct costs exceeded NPR 8000 (USD 73.5) in 69% of neonates with CSI. Age <29 days, moderate malnutrition, presence of any sign of critical illness and documented treatment failure were found to be important determinants of high costs for treatment of CSI. According to this study, the average treatment cost for a newborn with CSI in a public tertiary level hospital is substantial. The maximum limit offered for free newborn care in public hospitals needs to be revised for better acceptance and successful implementation of the FNC service to avert catastrophic health expenditures in developing countries like Nepal. Trial Registration: CTRI/2017/02/007966 (Registered on: 27/02/2017).


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Fees and Charges/statistics & numerical data , Government , Health Care Costs/trends , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/trends , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospitals, Public/economics , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Nepal , Sepsis/economics
9.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 76: 269-275, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175419

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of death worldwide, with carotid atherosclerosis accounting for 10-20% of cases. In Brazil, the Public Health System provides care for roughly two-thirds of the population. No studies, however, have analysed large-scale results of carotid bifurcation surgery in Brazil. METHODS: This study aimed to describe rates of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed between 2008 and 2019 in the country through web scraping of publicly available databases. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, 37,424 carotid bifurcation revascularization procedures were performed, of which 22,578 were CAS (60.34%) and 14,846 (39.66%) were CEA. There were 620 in-hospital deaths (1.66%), 336 after CAS (1.48%) and 284 after CEA (1.92%) (P = 0.032). Governmental reimbursement was US$ 77,216,298.85 (79.31% of all reimbursement) for CAS procedures and US$ 20,143,009.63 (20.69%) for CEA procedures. The average cost per procedure for CAS (US$ 3,062.98) was higher than that for CEA (US$ 1,430.33) (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil, the frequency of CAS largely surpassed that of CEA. In-hospital mortality rates of CAS were significantly lower than those of CEA, although both had mortality rates within the acceptable rates as dictated by literature. The cost of CAS, however, was significantly higher. This is a pioneering analysis of carotid artery disease management in Brazil that provides, for the first time, preliminary insight into the fact that the low adoption of CEA in the country is in opposition to countries where utilization rates are higher for CEA than for CAS.


Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Endarterectomy, Carotid/trends , Endovascular Procedures/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Public Health/trends , Stents/trends , Brazil/epidemiology , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/economics , Carotid Stenosis/mortality , Cost Savings/trends , Cost-Benefit Analysis/trends , Endarterectomy, Carotid/adverse effects , Endarterectomy, Carotid/economics , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/economics , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Public Health/economics , Public Health Systems Research , Retrospective Studies , Stents/economics , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(8): 1101-1109, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34058109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: New cases of COVID-19 continue to occur daily in the United States, and the need for medical treatments continues to grow. Knowledge of the direct medical costs of COVID-19 treatments is limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of older adults with COVID-19 and their costs for COVID-19-related medical care. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Medical claims for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries. PATIENTS: Medicare FFS beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who had a COVID-19-related medical encounter during April through December 2020. MEASUREMENTS: Patient characteristics and direct medical costs of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and outpatient visits. RESULTS: Among 28.1 million Medicare FFS beneficiaries, 1 181 127 (4.2%) sought COVID-19-related medical care. Among these patients, 23.0% had an inpatient stay and 4.2% died during hospitalization. The majority of the patients were female (57.0%), non-Hispanic White (79.6%), and residents of an urban county (77.2%). Medicare FFS costs for COVID-19-related medical care were $6.3 billion; 92.6% of costs were for hospitalizations. The mean hospitalization cost was $21 752, and the mean length of stay was 9.2 days; hospitalization cost and length of stay were higher if the patient needed a ventilator ($49 441 and 17.1 days) or died ($32 015 and 11.3 days). The mean cost per outpatient visit was $164. Patients aged 75 years or older were more likely to be hospitalized, but their hospitalizations were associated with lower costs than for younger patients. Male sex and non-White race/ethnicity were associated with higher probability of being hospitalized and higher medical costs. LIMITATION: Results are based on Medicare FFS patients. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in substantial disease and economic burden among older Americans, particularly those of non-White race/ethnicity. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/economics , COVID-19/economics , Direct Service Costs , Hospital Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Medicare/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Direct Service Costs/trends , Fee-for-Service Plans , Female , Hospital Costs/trends , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
11.
Surgery ; 170(3): 682-688, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33849734

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Institutional experience has been associated with reduced mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting and valve operations. Using a contemporary, national cohort, we examined the impact of hospital volume on hospitalization costs and postdischarge resource utilization after these operations. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve operations were identified in the 2016 to 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Institutions were grouped into volume quartiles based on annual elective cardiac surgery caseload, and comparisons were made between the lowest and highest quartiles, using generalized linear models. RESULTS: Of an estimated 296,510 patients, 24.8% were treated at low-volume hospitals and 25.2% at high-volume hospitals. Compared with patients treated at low-volume hospitals, patients managed at high-volume hospitals were younger, had more comorbidities, and more frequently underwent combined coronary artery bypass grafting valve (13.0% vs 12.3%, P < .001) and multivalve operations (6.2% vs 3.1%, P < .001). After adjustment, operations at high-volume hospitals were associated with a $7,600 reduction (95% confidence interval $4,700-$10,500) in costs. High-volume hospitals were also associated with reduced odds of mortality, non-home discharge, and 30-day non-elective readmission compared to low-volume hospitals. CONCLUSION: Despite increased complexity at high-volume centers, greater operative volume was independently associated with reduced hospitalization costs and mortality after elective cardiac operations. Reduction in non-home discharge and readmissions suggests this effect to extend beyond acute hospitalization, which may guide value-based care paradigms.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/mortality , Data Management/methods , Elective Surgical Procedures/mortality , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Low-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/economics , Elective Surgical Procedures/economics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Incidence , Male , Patient Readmission/trends , Postoperative Complications/economics , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , United States/epidemiology
12.
Am J Cardiol ; 149: 95-102, 2021 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757784

ABSTRACT

There has been little exploration of acute myocarditis trends in children despite notable advancements in care over the past decade. We explored trends in pediatric hospitalizations for acute myocarditis from 2007 to 2016 in the United States (US). This was a retrospective, serial cross-sectional study of the National Inpatient Sample database from 2007 to 2016, identifying patients ≤18 years hospitalized with acute myocarditis. Patient demographics and incidence trends were examined. Other relevant clinical and resource utilization outcomes were also explored. Out of 60,390,000 weighted pediatric hospitalizations, 6371 were related to myocarditis. The incidence of myocarditis increased from 0.7 to 0.9 per 100,000 children (p <0.0001) over the study period. The mortality decreased from 7.5% to 6.1% (p = 0.02). A significant inflation-adjusted increase by $4,574 in the median hospitalization cost was noted (p = 0.02) while length of stay remained stable (median 6.1 days). Tachyarrhythmias were identified as the most common type of associated arrhythmia. The occurrence of congestive heart failure remained steady at 27%. In conclusion, in-hospital mortality associated with pediatric acute myocarditis has decreased in the United States over years 2007 to 2016 with a concurrent rise in incidence. Despite steady length of stay, hospitalization costs have increased. Future studies investigating long-term outcomes relating to acute myocarditis are warranted.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/trends , Myocarditis/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospital Costs/trends , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/trends , Male , United States/epidemiology
13.
Chest ; 160(1): 165-174, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the frequency and cost of hospitalizations for acute respiratory failure (ARF), the literature regarding the impact of hospital safety net burden on outcomes of these hospitalizations is sparse. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does safety net burden impact outcomes of ARF hospitalizations such as mortality, tracheostomy, and resource use? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample 2007-2017. All patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ARF were tabulated using the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th Revision codes, and safety net burden was calculated using previously published methodology. High- and low-burden hospitals were generated from proportions of Medicaid and uninsured patients. Trends were analyzed using a nonparametric rank-based test, whereas multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to establish associations of safety net burden with key clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of an estimated 8,941,334 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of ARF, 33.9% were categorized as occurring at low-burden hospitals (LBHs) and 31.6% were categorized as occurring at high-burden hospitals (HBHs). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased at HBHs (22.8%-12.6%; nonparametric trend [nptrend] < .001) and LBHs (22.0%-10.9%; nptrend < .001) over the study period, as did tracheostomy placement (HBH, 5.6%-1.3%; LBH, 3.5%-0.8%; all nptrend <.001). After adjustment for patient and hospital factors, an HBH was associated with increased odds of mortality (adjusted OR [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.10-1.12) and tracheostomy use (AOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.29-1.37), as well as greater hospitalization costs (ß coefficient, +$1,083; 95% CI, $882-$1,294) and longer lengths of stay (ß coefficient, +3.3 days; 95% CI, 3.2-3.3 days). INTERPRETATION: After accounting for differences between patient cohorts, high safety net burden was associated independently with inferior clinical outcomes and increased costs after ARF hospitalizations. These findings emphasize the need for health care reform to ameliorate disparities within these safety net centers, which treat our most vulnerable populations.


Subject(s)
Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/trends , Respiratory Insufficiency/epidemiology , Safety-net Providers/economics , Acute Disease , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Medicaid/economics , Respiratory Insufficiency/economics , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
14.
Thorac Cancer ; 12(5): 567-579, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33544445

ABSTRACT

Thoracoscopic lobectomy has become the preferred approach for surgical management of early stage lung cancer, but the potential higher operative costs limit its widespread use. Theoretically, higher direct costs may be significantly counterbalanced by lower indirect costs, resulting in lower overall costs for thoracoscopic than for open lobectomy. To support this hypothesis, we reviewed the literature until May 2020, analyzing all papers comparing the cost of thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy.A total of 20 studies provided the most applicable evidence to evaluate this issue. In all the studies apart from one, thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with higher operative costs due to the increased use of disposable instruments, and prolonged operative time. By contrast, in 17 studies the increased operative costs were significantly offset by indirect costs which were lower in thoracoscopic than in open lobectomy due to fewer postoperative complications, faster recovery, and lower readmission rates. It translated into lower overall costs for thoracoscopic than for open lobectomy in 10 studies, similar costs in seven, and higher in three, despite the lower hospitalization costs. The low bed fees and high prices of disposable instruments in these three studies may explain the discordance. The careful use of disposable instruments, and the minimizing hospitalization costs can reduce the total costs of thoracoscopic lobectomy to levels similar or to below those of open lobectomy. The worry that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy (VATSL) might be associated with an increased overal cost is thus not warranted, and should not be used as an excuse against the use of VATS in surgery for early stage lung cancers.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs/trends , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Pneumonectomy/methods , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/methods , Female , Humans , Male
15.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 9(1): 62-72.e1, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32522616

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Outflow venous stenting as an adjunct to catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is performed to prevent recurrent thrombosis and to reduce the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome. Historical data show that stenting improves outcomes of surgical thrombectomy in patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and recent observational data suggest that stenting improves long-term outcomes of CDT. However, the impact of stenting during CDT on acute safety outcomes is unknown. We sought to investigate the contemporary trends, safety outcomes, and resource utilization of adjunctive stent placement in patients undergoing CDT. METHODS: Patients with proximal lower extremity and caval DVT were identified within the National Inpatient Sample from January 2005 to December 2013. From this data set, we stratified our patients into three groups: patients who received CDT alone, patients who received CDT plus angioplasty, and patients who received CDT plus angioplasty with stenting. We used an inverse probability treatment weighting algorithm to create three weighted cohorts. Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate the trends of stent placement among patients treated with CDT. The primary outcome was a composite end point of all-cause mortality, gastrointestinal bleed, or intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 138,049 patients were discharged with a principal diagnosis of proximal and caval DVT; 7097 of these patients received CDT (5.1%). From this group, 2854 (40.2%) were treated with CDT alone, 2311 (32.6%) received adjunctive angioplasty alone, and 1932 (27.2%) received adjunctive angioplasty and stent. Adjunctive stenting had a significantly lower rate of primary composite outcome compared with CDT alone (2.7% vs 3.8%; P = .04). Stent placement was associated with a similar length of stay compared with angioplasty and CDT alone groups (6.8 vs 6.9 vs 7.1 days, respectively; P = .94) and higher in-hospital charges ($115,164.01 ± $76,985.31 vs $98,089.82 ± $72,921.94 vs $80,441.63 ± $74,024.98; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study suggests that one in four patients undergoing CDT is treated with adjunctive stent placement in the United States. This observational study showed that adjunctive stenting does not adversely affect the acute safety outcomes of CDT; however, it was associated with increased hospital charges.


Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Thrombolytic Therapy/trends , Venous Thrombosis/therapy , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Inpatients , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Stents/trends , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Thrombolytic Therapy/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/mortality
16.
Am Surg ; 87(3): 364-369, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32988226

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The classic findings of acute appendicitis-right lower quadrant pain, anorexia, and leukocytosis-have been well known. However, emergency medicine and surgical providers continue to rely on imaging to confirm the diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the increase in reliance on computed tomography (CT) scans for acute appendicitis diagnosis over time. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients ≥18 years presenting to UNC Hospitals with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis who subsequently underwent appendectomy from 2011 to 2015. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pathologic data were reviewed. We evaluated the incidence of CT scans stratified by year, age, and sex. RESULTS: Within our male population, 55.2% (278/504) had classic appendicitis symptoms. Of the 278 male patients with classic appendicitis symptoms, 248 underwent CT imaging. Male patients <45 years of age were more likely to present with classic appendicitis symptoms (216/357, 60.5%) compared with patients aged 46-65 (52/108, 48.1%) or >65 (10/39, 25.6%). Of the male patients <45 years with classic appendicitis symptoms, the incidence of CT scans increased over time (68.3% in 2011, 84.2% in 2012, 92.3% in 2013, 93.9% in 2014, 92.3% in 2015). When considering the 216 CT scans that could have been avoided in our population, we calculate an approximate savings of $173 998.80 over 5 years. CONCLUSION: The incidence of CT scans for acute appendicitis confirmation has increased over time even in men. CT scans for the diagnosis or confirmation of acute appendicitis should rarely be indicated in men aged <45 years with classic appendicitis symptoms.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Hospital Costs/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/trends , Unnecessary Procedures/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/economics , Appendicitis/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , United States , Unnecessary Procedures/economics , Young Adult
17.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 72: 147-158, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33340669

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) surgery is relatively rare and controversial, given the challenges in diagnosis as well as wide variation in symptomatic and functional recovery. Our aims were to measure trends in utilization of TOS surgery, complications, and mortality rates in a nationally representative cohort and compare higher versus lower volume centers. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes for rib resection and scalenectomy paired with axillo-subclavian aneurysm (arterial [aTOS]), subclavian deep vein thrombosis (venous [vTOS]), or brachial plexus lesions (neurogenic [nTOS]). Basic descriptive statistics, nonparametric tests for trend, and multivariable hierarchical regression models with random intercept for center were used to compare outcomes for TOS types, trends over time, and higher and lower volume hospitals, respectively. RESULTS: There were 3,547 TOS operations (for an estimated 18,210 TOS operations nationally) performed between 2010 and 2015 (89.2% nTOS, 9.9% vTOS, and 0.9% aTOS) with annual case volume increasing significantly over time (P = 0.03). Higher volume centers (≥10 cases per year) represented 5.2% of hospitals and 37.0% of cases, and these centers achieved significantly lower overall major complication (defined as neurologic injury, arterial or venous injury, vascular graft complication, pneumothorax, hemorrhage/hematoma, or lymphatic leak) rates (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.71 [95% confidence interval 0.52-0.98]; P = 0.04], but no difference in neurologic complications such as brachial plexus injury (aOR 0.69 [0.20-2.43]; P = 0.56) or vascular injuries/graft complications (aOR 0.71 [0.0.33-1.54]; P = 0.39). Overall mortality was 0.6%, neurologic injury was rare (0.3%), and the proportion of patients experiencing complications decreased over time (P = 0.03). However, vTOS and aTOS had >2.5 times the odds of major complication compared with nTOS (OR 2.68 [1.88-3.82] and aOR 4.26 [1.78-10.17]; P < 0.001), and ∼10 times the odds of a vascular complication (aOR 10.37 [5.33-20.19] and aOR 12.93 [3.54-47.37]; P < 0.001], respectively. As the number of complications decreased, average hospital charges also significantly decreased over time (P < 0.001). Total hospital charges were on average higher when surgery was performed in lower volume centers (<10 cases per year) compared with higher volume centers (mean $65,634 [standard deviation 98,796] vs. $45,850 [59,285]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The annual number of TOS operations has increased in the United States from 2010 to 2015, whereas complications and average hospital charges have decreased. Mortality and neurologic injury remain rare. Higher volume centers delivered higher value care: less or similar operative morbidity with lower total hospital charges.


Subject(s)
Decompression, Surgical/trends , Osteotomy/trends , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/trends , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Decompression, Surgical/economics , Decompression, Surgical/mortality , Female , Hospital Charges/trends , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospitals, High-Volume/trends , Hospitals, Low-Volume/trends , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Middle Aged , Osteotomy/adverse effects , Osteotomy/economics , Osteotomy/mortality , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Retrospective Studies , Ribs/surgery , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/economics , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/economics , Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality , Young Adult
18.
Am J Cardiol ; 141: 79-85, 2021 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33275895

ABSTRACT

As the use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) expands to varying patient populations, impacting the landscape of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), this study sought to assess volume and performance trends of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the United States during 2012-2017. The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients who underwent endovascular/transapical TAVI, isolated SAVR, or complex aortic valve surgery between 2012 and 2017. Temporal trends in annual case volume, admission costs, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day readmission were evaluated. Of 624,303 patients (median age 72 years) who received AVR, 387,011 (62%) were men. Among these patients, 170,521 (27%) underwent TAVI and 453,782 (73%) underwent SAVR with 299,398 isolated and 154,384 complex aortic valve surgery. TAVI patients were significantly older and higher risk compared with SAVR patients. From 2012 to 2017, the annual number of TAVI increased from 8,295 to 55,168 whereas SAVR volume remained remarkably stable. Patients who underwent AVR demonstrated significant improvements in mortality, stroke, duration of hospitalization, and 30-day readmission. In conclusion, this large contemporary analysis reports the considerable growth of AVR in the United States. It remains unequivocal that the treatment of aortic stenosis is improving overall with reduced mortality following AVR, highlighting the effectiveness of various process improvements such as newer valves, enhanced patient selection, and the interdisciplinary Heart Team approach.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Hospital Mortality/trends , Patient Readmission/trends , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/trends , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Conduction System Disease/epidemiology , Cardiac Conduction System Disease/therapy , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/trends , Hospital Costs/trends , Humans , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Pacemaker, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
19.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 112(1): 124-131, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33068544

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the UK National Health Service, finite resources make the adoption of minimally invasive (MI) mitral valve surgery challenging unless greater operative costs (vs sternotomy [ST]) are balanced by postoperative savings. This study examined whether the cost analysis now became unfavorable. METHODS: All patients (n = 380) undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery with or without a maze procedure over a 3-year period by either MI or ST approaches were included. Propensity matching (2 cohorts, 1:1 matched;, n = 75 per group) and multivariable regression were used to assess for the effect on cost. Cost data were prospectively collected from Service Line Reporting and reported in Sterling (£) as median (interquartile range [IQR]). RESULTS: Matched data revealed that total hospital costs were equivalent (MI vs ST, £16,672 [IQR, £15,044, £20,611] vs £15,875 [IQR, £12,281, £20,687]; P .33). Three of 15 costing pools were significantly different: operative costs were higher for the MI group (MI vs ST, £7458 [IQR, £6738, £8286] vs £5596 iIQR, £4204, £6992]; P < .001), whereas ward costs (boarding, nursing) (MI vs ST, £1464 [IQR, £1146, £1864] vs £1733 [IQR, £1403, £2445] P = .006) and pharmacy services (MI vs ST, £187 [IQR, £140, £239] vs £244 [IQR, £179, £375] P < .001) were lower for the MI group. Hospital stay was shorter in the MI group (MI vs ST, 6 days [IQR, 5, 8 days] vs 8 days [IQR, 6, 11 days]; P < .001). Multivariable regression produced similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in overall hospital cost between MI and ST mitral valve surgery: higher operative costs of MI surgery were offset by lower postoperative costs, with a 2-day shorter hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/economics , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Hospital Costs/trends , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/economics , Mitral Valve/surgery , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , United Kingdom
20.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(12): e2028470, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33284340

ABSTRACT

Importance: Hospitals are reimbursed based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs), which are defined, in part, by patients having 1 or more complications or comorbidities within a given DRG family. Hospitals have made substantial investment in efforts to document these complications and comorbidities. Objective: To examine temporal trends in DRGs with a major complication or comorbidity, compare these findings with 2 alternative measures of disease severity, and estimate associated changes in payment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the all-payer National Inpatient Sample for admissions assigned to 1 of the top 20 reimbursed DRG families at US acute care hospitals from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from July 10, 2018, to May 29, 2019. Exposures: Quarter year of hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of DRGs with a major complication or comorbidity. Secondary outcomes were comorbidity scores, risk-adjusted mortality rates, and estimated payment. Changes in assigned DRGs, comorbidity scores, and risk-adjusted mortality rates were analyzed by linear regression. Payment changes were estimated for each DRG by calculating the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services weighted payment using 2012 and 2016 case mix and hospitalization counts. Results: Between 2012 and 2016, there were 62 167 976 hospitalizations for the 20 highest-reimbursed DRG families; the sample was 32.9% male and 66.8% White, with a median age of 57 years (interquartile range, 31-73 years). Within 15 of these DRG families (75%), the proportion of DRGs with a major complication or comorbidity increased significantly over time. Over the same period, comorbidity scores were largely stable, with a decrease in 6 DRG families (30%), no change in 10 (50%), and an increase in 4 (20%). Among 19 DRG families with a calculable mortality rate, the risk-adjusted mortality rate significantly decreased in 8 (42%), did not change in 9 (47%), and increased in 2 (11%). The observed DRG shifts were associated with at least $1.2 billion in increased payment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, between 2012 and 2016, the proportion of admissions assigned to a DRG with major complication or comorbidity increased for 15 of the top 20 reimbursed DRG families. This change was not accompanied by commensurate increases in disease severity but was associated with increased payment.


Subject(s)
Diagnosis-Related Groups , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospitalization , Comorbidity , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Diagnosis-Related Groups/trends , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medicare/economics , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Reimbursement Mechanisms/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL