ABSTRACT
With the introduction of the novel coronavirus in late 2019, the healthcare system of every country in the world experienced many challenges. In India, every healthcare organization has prepared itself to fight against these global challenges. This study aims to describe the challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic and how we dealt with the pandemic successfully. This narrative analysis study was made in a 960-bedded teaching hospital during the pandemic. The challenges were identified from the minutes of meetings, circulars issued, and various strategic decisions made to combat the pandemic. The challenges faced by the institute were categorized into nine different categories: infrastructural, human resource, hospital operations, and others. Lack of knowledge during the initial days of the pandemic, need for round-theclock situational management, and day-to-day operation needed aggressive training and adherence to the guidelines. Gaps identified in areas like inventory, infection control, logistics, etc., were quickly addressed, and processes were created as per the nation's changing guidelines. This study revealed strategies to manage the pandemic by optimally utilizing available resources with good teamwork and situational leadership.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tertiary Care Centers , India/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/methodsABSTRACT
Este Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (TCC) investiga a prática da puericultura e o atendimento pediátrico por residentes, com foco no aprendizado, confiança e atualizações dos profissionais, proporcionados pelos programas de residência médica. Os resultados revelam que a atualização é crucial para garantir a qualidade do atendimento, considerando as constantes evoluções na área pediátrica. Aspectos como crescimento, desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor, vacinação, diário alimentar e dinâmica familiar são fundamentais na consulta de puericultura e a conscientização sobre a importância da vacinação também é relevante. Promover programas de residência médica com formação teórica sólida e baseada em evidências científicas é essencial para o desenvolvimento de profissionais preparados para uma prática pediátrica de excelência, beneficiando diretamente a saúde das crianças e adolescentes atendidos. Palavras-chave: Medicina baseada em evidências. Puericultura. Hospitais de Ensino. Pediatria. Residência médica.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Pediatrics/education , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Avitaminosis/prevention & control , Awareness/classification , Child Care/organization & administration , Child Health/statistics & numerical data , Immunization Schedule , Vaccination/standards , Vaccination/trends , Total Quality Management/methods , Immunization Programs , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/prevention & control , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Humans , Internship and Residency , Pandemics , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pakistan is a lower middle-income country located in South Asia with a population of nearly 208 million. Sindh is its second largest province. The aim of this survey was to identify the current setup of pediatric services, staffing, equipment, and training infrastructure in the teaching hospitals of Sindh. METHODS: The survey was conducted between June 2018 and September 2018. A questionnaire was designed with input from experts and pretested. One faculty coordinator from each of 12 of the 13 teaching hospitals (7 government and 5 private) completed the form. Information was exported into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. Frequency and percentages were computed for all variables. Confidentiality was ensured by anonymizing the data. RESULTS: Anesthesia services are provided by consultants with either membership or fellowship in anesthesia of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan (CPSP). All drugs on the World Health Organization (WHO) essential medication list were available, although narcotic supply was often inconsistent. Weak areas identified were absence of standardization of practice regarding premedication, preoperative laboratory testing, pain assessment, and management. No national practice guidelines exist. Pulse oximeters and capnometers were available in all private hospitals but in only 86% and 44% of the government hospitals, respectively. Some training centers were not providing the training as outlined by the CPSP criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Several gaps have been identified in the practice and training infrastructure of pediatric anesthesia. There is a need for national guidelines, standardization of protocols, provision of basic equipment, and improved supervision of trainees. One suggestion is to have combined residency programs between private and government hospitals to take advantage of the strengths of both. Recommendations by this group have been shared with all teaching hospitals and training bodies.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Anesthesiology/education , Anesthesiology/methods , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Pediatrics/education , Pediatrics/methods , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care , Guidelines as Topic , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Internship and Residency , Pain Management , Pain Measurement , Pakistan , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Premedication/standards , Referral and Consultation , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In this article, we aim to share our experience in the hospital reorganization made to conduct the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign, based on the principles of flexibility and adaptability. STUDY DESIGN: A descriptive study. METHODS: The data concerning the organization of the vaccination campaign were taken from the operative protocol developed by the hospital dedicated task force, composed by experts in hygiene, public health, occupational medicine, pharmacists, nurses, hospital quality, and disaster managers. Data about the numbers of vaccine administered daily were collected by the Innovation and Development Operative Unit database. RESULTS: Vaccinations against COVID-19 started across the EU on the 27th of December 2020. The first phase of the vaccination campaign carried out in our hospital was directed to healthcare workers immunization including medical residents, social care operators, administrative staff and technicians, students of medicine, and health professions trainees. The second phase was enlarged to the coverage of extremely fragile subjects. Thanks to the massive employment of healthcare workers and the establishment of dynamic pathways, it was possible to achieve short turnaround times and a large number of doses administered daily, with peaks of 870 vaccines per day. From the 27th of December up to the 14th of March a total of 26,341 doses of Pfizer have been administered. 13,584 were first doses and 12,757 were second doses. From the 4th to the 14th of March, 296 first doses of Moderna were dispensed. It was necessary to implement adequate spaces and areas adopting anti-contagion safety measures: waiting area for subjects to be vaccinated, working rooms for the dilution of the vaccine and the storage of the material, vaccination rooms, post-vaccination observation areas, room for observation, and treatment of any adverse reactions, with an emergency cart available in each working area. CONCLUSIONS: The teaching hospital of Pisa faced the beginning of the immunization campaign readjusting its spaces, planning an adequate hospital vaccination area and providing an organization plan to ensure the achievement of the targets of the campaign. This represented a challenge due to limited vaccine doses supplied and the multisectoral teams of professionals to coordinate in the shortest time and the safest way possible. The organizational model adopted proved to be adequate and therefore exploited also for the second phase aimed to extremely fragile subjects.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , BNT162 Vaccine , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Humans , Italy/epidemiologyABSTRACT
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Intravenous to oral (IV-PO) antibiotic conversion, one of the critical elements in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), is not well implemented in China. Studies on the strategy to apply the IV-PO conversion are needed. Our objective was to evaluate the impact and its barriers of a pharmacist-led practice with computerized reminders on IV-PO antibiotic conversion for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) inpatients. METHOD: This was a retrospective, observational pre- and post-intervention study. Interventions were introduced in 2 sequential 12-month phases: Phase 1: pharmacists implemented the conventional practice of reviewing patient charts and medication records every 24 h and verbally informed the prescribers on eligible IV-PO conversions; Phase 2: pharmacists implemented a new intervention practice to inform the prescribers with a computerized reminder in electronic medical record system on eligible IV-PO conversions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who converted to oral therapy on the day patients were eligible for the conversion. The secondary outcomes were length of IV antibiotic therapy days, total length of antibiotic therapy days and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 524 patients were studied (256 in phase 1 and 268 in phase 2). The proportion of patients who converted to oral therapy on the day patients were eligible for the conversion was significantly increased from 34.77% (89/256) in phase 1 to 62.69% (168/268) in phase 2 (p < 0.05). Length of IV antibiotic therapy days in phase 2 was shortened by 1.23 days, which was 5.52 days compared to 6.75 days in phase 1 (p < 0.05). Total length of antibiotic therapy days was 12.05 days in Phase 1, compared to 10.75 days in phase 2 (p > 0.05). Length of hospital stay for patients in phase 2 was significantly shorter, with a difference of 1.38 days (6.02 days vs. 7.40 days, p < 0.05). The most common barrier of not converting IV-PO was the presence of co-morbidity. CONCLUSION: The pharmacist-led IV-PO antibiotic conversion practice with computerized reminders was successful and feasible in Chinese hospitals. More IV-PO intervention studies in patients with other infections are needed in the future.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antimicrobial Stewardship/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , China , Community-Acquired Infections , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
India reported its index case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January 2020 and since then there has been an alarming rise in cases. In response to the worsening pandemic and the challenge presented by COVID-19 for hospitals in the public sector, the Government of India asked the country's private hospitals to reserve a percentage of their beds for COVID-19 patients. This article describes how nursing services at the Christian Medical College, Vellore - an unaided, not-for-profit quaternary care teaching hospital in Tamil Nadu, India - addressed various challenges to ensure a sustained, high-quality nursing care response to increased patient load. The main challenges included changing COVID-19 policies, ensuring the hospital was prepared to care for COVID-19 patients, and ensuring the availability of nurses. The article demonstrates how proactive planning, empowered involvement of nursing leaders and collaborative efforts resulted in deployment and training of 1,400 nurses, and ensured coordinated care for more than 10,000 patients with COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/nursing , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Nurse Administrators , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals, Voluntary/organization & administration , Humans , India/epidemiology , Nursing Administration ResearchSubject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Hospitals, Urban/organization & administration , Patient Transfer , Aged , Female , Hospital Bed Capacity , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , SpainABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nocturnists (overnight hospitalists) are commonly implemented in US teaching hospitals to adhere to per-resident patient caps and improve care but are rare in Canada, where patient caps and duty hours are comparatively flexible. Our objective was to assess the impact of a newly implemented nocturnist program on perceived quality of care, code status documentation and patient outcomes. METHODS: Nocturnists were phased in between June 2018 and December 2019 at Toronto General Hospital, a large academic teaching hospital in Toronto, Ontario. We performed a quality-improvement study comparing rates of code status entry into the electronic health record at admission, in-hospital mortality, the 30-day readmission rate and hospital length of stay for patients with cancer admitted by nocturnists and by residents. Surveys were administered in June 2019 to general internal medicine faculty and residents to assess their perceptions of the impact of the nocturnist program. RESULTS: From July 2018 to June 2019, 30 nocturnists were on duty for 241/364 nights (66.5%), reducing the mean maximum overnight per-resident patient census from 40 (standard deviation [SD] 4) to 25 (SD 5) (p < 0.001). The rate of admission code status entry was 35.3% among patients admitted by residents (n = 133) and 54.9% among those admitted by nocturnists (n = 339) (p < 0.001). The mortality rate was 10.5% among patients admitted by residents and 5.6% among those admitted by nocturnists (p = 0.06), the 30-day readmission rate was 8.3% and 5.9%, respectively (p = 0.4), and the mean acute length of stay was 7.2 (SD 7.0) days and 6.4 (SD 7.8) days, respectively (p = 0.3). Surveys were completed by 15/24 faculty (response rate 62%), who perceived improvements in patient safety, efficiency and trainee education; however, only 30/102 residents (response rate 29.4%) completed the survey. INTERPRETATION: Although implementation of a nocturnist program did not affect patient outcomes, it reduced residents' overnight patient census, and improved faculty perceptions of quality of care and education, as well as documentation of code status. Our results support nocturnist implementation in Canadian teaching hospitals.
Subject(s)
After-Hours Care , Hospitalists , Hospitals, Teaching , Internship and Residency , Neoplasms , After-Hours Care/methods , After-Hours Care/organization & administration , Canada/epidemiology , Electronic Health Records , Hospitalists/education , Hospitalists/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/methods , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Humans , Internship and Residency/methods , Internship and Residency/standards , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/trends , Quality of Health Care/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Traumatic spinal cord injury is a debilitating condition that may cause long term disabilities with tremendous socioeconomic impact on affected individuals and their families. Secondary injuries can best prevent or minimized by appropriate pre hospital management and proper referral and transfer. This study was conducted to assess the clinical profile of traumatic spinal cord injuries and level of pre-hospital care provided to patients either at the site of injury or at other healthcare facilities. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad, from January 2012 to January 2017. All patients with suspected spinal injury were included in the study. Age, gender, mode of injuries and the pre-tertiary care provided were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 4464 patients with suspected spinal cord injury, 3685 (82.5%) were male, 779 (17.4%) were female. Age ranged from 10-70 years. 1685 (37.8%) were diagnosed as having spinal injury. Cervical spine was the most common affected level 743 (44.09%), followed by thoracic spine 135 (8.01%). 1441 (85.5%) were incomplete while 224(14.5%) were complete spinal cord injuries. Road traffic accident was the most common mechanism of injury 884 (52.4%). Only 4 (0.23%) patients directly received in our unit were properly transported, 66 (3.91%) were brought after proper spinal immobilization, intravenous line was maintained in 584 (34.66%) patients, 410 (24.3%) patients received some fluid resuscitation, parenteral analgesia was given to 441 (26.17%) patients while urinary catheterization was done in 195 (11.75%) patients. Those received from other healthcare facilities only 4 (0.23%) were brought by properly equipped ambulance, intravenous access was maintained in 438 (25.99%),320 (18.99%) received some fluid resuscitation, urinary catheterization was done in 229(13.59%) while proper parenteral analgesia was given to 988 (58.63%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is a complete lack of proper transport and referral of trauma patients in our area which reflects almost non-existent emergency medical (rescue) services, deficient health care facilities.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Fluid Therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Referral and Consultation , Spinal Cord Injuries/etiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Urinary Catheterization , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess patient acceptance of resident involvement in otolaryngologic procedures and to evaluate the impact of a written preoperative educational pamphlet. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: This is a prospective survey study at a large tertiary care academic center. In addition to standard perioperative instructions and informed consent, 87 out of 183 patients received a pamphlet with information on the role of the otolaryngology resident. RESULTS: Greater than 90% of all patients surveyed recognized that resident physicians are directly involved in delivering care at teaching hospitals and may have assisted in their surgical procedure. Ninety percent of patients receiving educational pamphlets were aware residents may have performed portions of their procedure versus 71% in the control group (P = .001). Ninety-seven percent of patients receiving pamphlets wanted to know how much of their procedure was performed by a resident versus 71% of the control group (P < .001), and patients undergoing single-surgeon procedures were less likely to want to know how much was performed by a resident (P < .05). Ninety-six percent in the pamphlet group agreed that residents improved the quality of their care versus 79% of the control group (P = .001). DISCUSSION: Resident surgeons are well received by the large majority of otolaryngology patients. Structured perioperative information regarding surgical training facilitates an honest and open informed consent discussion between the patient and surgeon and helps to establish a solid foundation of trust. CONCLUSION: Implementation of this practice is simple and inexpensive. It should be considered for any clinical practice with a focus on surgical education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:2448-2454, 2021.
Subject(s)
Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Otolaryngology/education , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Surgeons/education , Adult , Aged , Female , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Otolaryngology/organization & administration , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Surgeons/organization & administration , Surgeons/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Performance of a trauma tertiary survey (TTS) reduces rates of missed injuries, but performance has been inconsistent at trauma centers. The objectives of this study were to assess whether quality improvement (QI) efforts would increase the frequency of TTS documentation and determine if TTS documentation would increase identification of traumatic injuries. Our hypothesis was that QI efforts would improve documentation of the TTS. METHODS: Before-and-after analysis of QI interventions at a level 1 trauma center was performed. The interventions included an electronic template for TTS documentation, customized educational sessions, and emphasis from trauma leadership on TTS performance. The primary outcome was documentation of the TTS. Detection of additional injuries based on tertiary evaluation was a secondary outcome. Associations between outcomes and categorical patient and encounter characteristics were assessed using χ2 tests. RESULTS: Overall, 592 trauma encounters were reviewed (296 preimplementation and 296 postimplementation). Trauma tertiary survey documentation was significantly higher after implementation of the interventions (30.1% preimplementation vs. 85.1% postimplementation, p < 0.001). Preimplementation documentation of the TTS was less likely earlier in the academic year (14.3% first academic quarter vs. 46.5% last academic quarter, p < 0.001), but this temporal pattern was no longer evident postimplementation (88.5% first academic quarter vs. 77.9% last academic quarter, p = 0.126). Patients were more likely to have a missed traumatic injury diagnosed on TTS postimplementation (1.7% in preimplementation vs. 5.7% postimplementation, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Documentation of the TTS and missed injury detection rates were significantly increased following implementation of a bundle of QI interventions. The association between time of year and documentation of the TTS was also attenuated, likely through reduction of the resident learning curve. Targeted efforts to improve TTS performance may improve outcomes for trauma patients at teaching hospitals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management, Level IV.
Subject(s)
Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Missed Diagnosis/prevention & control , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Quality Improvement , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Adult , Documentation , Female , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Missed Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Palliative care has improved quality of end-of-life (EOL) care for patients with cancer, and these benefits may be extended to patients with other serious illnesses. EOL care quality for patients with home-based care is a critical problem for health care providers. We compare EOL quality care between patients with advanced illnesses receiving home-based care with and without palliative services.The medical records of deceased patients who received home-based care at a community teaching hospital in south Taiwan from January to December 2019 were collected retrospectively. We analyzed EOL care quality indicators during the last month of life.A total of 164 patients were included for analysis. Fifty-two (31.7%) received palliative services (HP group), and 112 (68.3%) did not receive palliative services (non-HP group). Regarding the quality indicators of EOL care, we discovered that a lower percentage of the HP group died in a hospital than did that of the non-HP group (34.6% vs 62.5%, Pâ=â.001) through univariate analysis. We found that the HP group had lower scores on the aggressiveness of EOL care than did the non-HP group (0.5â±â0.9 vs 1.0â±â1.0, P<.001). Furthermore, palliative services were a significant and negative factor of dying in a hospital after adjustment (ORâ=â0.13, 95%CIâ=â0.05-0.36, Pâ<â.001).For patients with advanced illnesses receiving home-based care, palliative services are associated with lower scores on the aggressiveness of EOL care and a reduced probability of dying in a hospital.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness/therapy , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/organization & administration , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/organization & administration , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Critical Illness/mortality , Female , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Hospitals, Community/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Taiwan/epidemiology , Terminal Care/methods , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Communication , Drug Stability , Drug Storage , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Humans , Marketing of Health Services/organization & administration , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , WorkflowABSTRACT
In China, pharmacists have started to manage cancer pain at outpatient clinics. This retrospective study performed at a tertiary teaching hospital was aimed to evaluate the effects of a physician-pharmacist joint clinic for cancer pain management. The study was performed between December 2016 and August 2019 and included 113 outpatients with moderate to severe cancer-related pain. Patients were divided into two groups according to the clinic each patient visited: the physician-pharmacist joint clinic (joint group, n = 59) or physician-only clinic (usual group, n = 54). Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Morisky Medication Adherence Measure (MMAM) were used to collect data on pain intensity, interference and medication adherence. Pain Management Index (PMI) was also calculated. BPI, MMAM and PMI were assessed at baseline (patients' first visit, week 0) and week 4 follow-up. The Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to assess patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at week 4. The primary outcomes were the improvement in pain intensity, adequacy of pain management and medication adherence. The secondary outcome was the improvement in HRQoL. At week 4, compared to the usual group, the BPI pain intensity categories except the pain right now were significantly lower in the joint group: worst pain, 4 (3-7) vs 6 (4-8), P = .020; least pain, 1 (0-2) vs 2 (1-3), P = .010; average pain, 3 (2-4) vs 4 (2-5), P = .023; pain right now, 2 (1-3) vs 2 (0-4), P = .796. For the seven pain interference categories, there were no significant improvements in the joint group (P > .05). Significantly more patients achieved adequate pain control in the joint group than the usual group ((P = .002). There was also a significant difference in medication adherence between the two groups (P = .001). There were no significant differences in HRQoL between the two groups. The study suggests that pharmacist participation in outpatient cancer pain management is associated with improvement of patients' pain control and medication adherence.
Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Cancer Pain/diagnosis , Cancer Pain/etiology , Cancer Pain/psychology , China , Female , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/organization & administration , Professional Role , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administrationABSTRACT
COVID-19 led to the widespread withdrawal of face-to-face hospital-based clinical placements, with many medical schools switching to online learning. This precipitated concern about potential negative impact on clinical and interprofessional skill acquisition. To overcome this problem, we piloted a 12-week COVID-19 safe face-to-face clinical placement for 16 medical students at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 infection control measures necessitated that students remained in 'social bubbles' for placement duration. This facilitated an apprenticeship-style teaching approach, integrating students into the clinical team for placement duration. Team-based learning was adopted to develop and deliver content. Teaching comprised weekly seminars, experiential ward-based attachments and participation in quality improvement and research projects. The taught content was evaluated through qualitative feedback, reflective practice, and pre-apprenticeship and post-apprenticeship confidence questionnaires across 17 domains. Students' confidence improved in 14 of 17 domains (p<0.05). Reflective practice indicated that students valued the apprenticeship model, preferring the longer clinical attachment to existent shorter, fragmented clinical placements. Students described improved critical thinking, group cohesion, teamwork, self-confidence, self-worth and communication skills. This article describes a framework for the safe and effective delivery of a longer face-to-face apprenticeship-based clinical placement during an infectious disease pandemic. Longer apprenticeship-style attachments have hidden benefits to general professional training, which should be explored by medical schools both during the COVID-19 pandemic and, possibly, for any future clinical placements.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clinical Clerkship , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Teaching , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Clinical Clerkship/methods , Clinical Clerkship/trends , Education, Distance , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration , Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Interprofessional Education , London , Quality Improvement , SARS-CoV-2 , Students, Medical , Teaching/standards , Teaching/trendsABSTRACT
This article describes an academic-clinical partnership program between a school of nursing and an American Nurse Credentialing Center Magnet®- and National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center based on a shared vision and multifaceted for optimal new graduate operating room (OR) recruitment and use of clinical partner resources. The program, now in its 3rd year, has a 100% retention rate among the cohorts. Implementing a multifaceted OR partnership program based on nursing theory is a strategy for workforce development to increase retention of new graduate OR nurses.