ABSTRACT
Prunella vulgaris L. (P. vulgaris) has great application value and development prospects in improving sleep. In this study, we continued to evaluate the sleep-improvement function and mechanism of P. vulgaris from both chemical characterization and function based on sleep-improvement functional ingredients, rosmarinic acid and salviaflaside, screened out in the previous stage as the index components. The chemical constituents of P. vulgaris and its phenolic acid fraction were characterized by the UPLC-MSn technology. The quality of the sleep-improvement phenolic acid fraction of P. vulgaris was scientifically evaluated by fingerprints combined with quantitative analysis of rosmarinic acid and salviaflaside. The function of phenolic acid parts of P. vulgaris in improving sleep was verified by different insomnia models including the PCPA-induced insomnia model and surface platform sleep deprivation model. HE staining was used to observe the effect of P. vulgaris on the morphology of nerve cells in different brain regions. In vivo experiments and molecular docking explored the sedative-hypnotic effects of functional ingredients of P. vulgaris. All these results investigated the material basis and mechanism of P. vulgaris to improve sleep from multiple perspectives, which contribute to providing a basis for the development of functional food to improve sleep.
Subject(s)
Depsides , Plant Extracts , Prunella , Rosmarinic Acid , Sleep , Prunella/chemistry , Animals , Sleep/drug effects , Depsides/analysis , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Male , Cinnamates/analysis , Molecular Docking Simulation , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Hydroxybenzoates/analysis , Mice , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Insomnia is a sleep disorder in which you have trouble falling and/or staying asleep. This research aims to evaluate the sedative effects of fraxin (FX) on sleeping mice induced by thiopental sodium (TS). In addition, a molecular docking study was conducted to investigate the molecular processes underlying these effects. The study used adult male Swiss albino mice and administered FX (10 and 20 mg/kg, i.p.) and diazepam (DZP) (2 mg/kg) either separately or in combination within the different groups to examine their modulatory effects. After a period of 30 min, the mice that had been treated were administered (TS: 20 mg/kg, i.p.) to induce sleep. The onset of sleep for the mice and the length of their sleep were manually recorded. Additionally, a computational analysis was conducted to predict the role of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors in the sleep process and evaluate their pharmacokinetics and toxicity. The outcomes indicated that FX extended the length of sleep and reduced the time it took to fall asleep. When the combined treatment of FX and DZP showed synergistic sedative action. Also, FX had a binding affinity of -7.2 kcal/mol, while DZP showed -8.4 kcal/mol. The pharmacokinetic investigation of FX demonstrated favorable drug-likeness and strong pharmacokinetic characteristics. Ultimately, FX demonstrated a strong sedative impact in the mouse model, likely via interacting with the GABAA receptor pathways.
Subject(s)
Diazepam , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Molecular Docking Simulation , Sleep , Animals , Male , Mice , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Diazepam/pharmacology , Sleep/drug effects , Receptors, GABA/metabolism , Receptors, GABA-A/metabolismABSTRACT
Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with a unique pharmacokinetic profile that makes it an attractive option for use in general anesthesia. This review paper provides an in-depth analysis of remimazolam's applications in the field of general anesthesia, focusing on its pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and potential advantages compared to other anesthetic agents. Remimazolam acts on GABAa receptors, offering rapid onset and recovery times due to its unique metabolic pathway involving tissue esterases. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy in procedural sedation and general anesthesia, showing a favorable safety profile with minimal cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Compared to traditional anesthetics such as propofol, remimazolam presents distinct advantages, including predictable pharmacokinetics, reduced risk of prolonged sedation, and a reliable safety margin. These attributes position remimazolam as a promising agent in various clinical settings. The purpose of this review is to synthesize current evidence on remimazolam and discuss its potential to improve clinical outcomes in anesthesia practice.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Benzodiazepines , Humans , Benzodiazepines/pharmacokinetics , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacokinetics , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , AnimalsABSTRACT
Background: The management of preoperative anxiety in pediatric patients, as well as its implications, has remained challenging for anesthesiologists. In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and ketamine as surgical premedication in children. Methods: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in January 2014, on 90 children aged between 2-7 years old. The participants' American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status was I or II, and they were scheduled for elective unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. Using the block randomization method, the patients were randomly assigned to three groups, each receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine (2 µg/Kg), midazolam (0.2 mg/Kg), and ketamine (8 mg/Kg) 60 min before induction of anesthesia. Anxiety and sedation state were evaluated before drug administration, and then every 10 min for the next 50 min. Parental separation anxiety, mask acceptance, postoperative agitation, pain, nausea, and vomiting were also recorded and compared between these groups. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Ketamine indicated the strongest sedative effect 10, 20, and 30 min after administration of premedication (P<0.001, P=0.03, P=0.01, respectively). However, dexmedetomidine was more effective than other drugs after 40 and 50 min (P<0.001). Other variables indicated no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: In case of emergencies, intranasal ketamine, with the shortest time of action, could be administered. Intranasal dexmedetomidine, which was revealed to be the most potent drug in this study, could be administrated 40-50 min before elective pediatric surgeries.Trial registration number: IRCT2013081614372N1.
Subject(s)
Administration, Intranasal , Dexmedetomidine , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Ketamine , Midazolam , Humans , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Ketamine/pharmacology , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Midazolam/therapeutic use , Midazolam/pharmacology , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Child, Preschool , Male , Female , Child , Administration, Intranasal/methods , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Anxiety/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of intranasal (IN) and intramuscular (IM) midazolam-butorphanol-ketamine on intraocular pressure (IOP), tear production (TP) and sedation in rabbits. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover experimental study. ANIMALS: Fourteen male New Zealand White rabbits, aged 1-2 years, body mass 3.1 ± 0.8 kg (mean ± standard deviation). METHODS: Rabbits were administered midazolam (1 mg kg-1), butorphanol (1.5 mg kg-1) and ketamine (5 mg kg-1) via IN and IM routes. IOP, TP and sedation scores were assessed at 0 (before drug administration), 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after drug administration. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR), rectal temperature (RT), noninvasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and peripheral hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2) were simultaneously recorded until 45 minutes after drug administration. The onset and duration of sedation and sedation scores were recorded. RESULTS: Drug delivery route had no significant impact on mean IOP (p = 0.271) or TP (p = 0.062), and there were no significant changes over time for IOP (p = 0.711) or TP (p = 0.372). Similarly, delivery route had no significant impact on HR (p = 0.747), fR (p = 0.872), RT (p = 0.379), MAP (p = 0.217) and SpO2 (p = 0.254). Sedation onset was faster with IN (3.0 ± 1.0 minutes) than with IM administration (4.9 ± 0.7 minutes) (p = 0.011), but sedation duration was significantly longer with IM (52.6 ± 7.2 minutes) than with IN delivery (30.7 ± 6.8 minutes) (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in sedation scores between the two delivery routes at any of the recorded time points. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The combination of midazolam-butorphanol-ketamine had minimal impact on physiological and ocular variables regardless of the route of administration, whereas IN drug administration led to a shorter onset and duration of action than IM administration.
Subject(s)
Administration, Intranasal , Butorphanol , Intraocular Pressure , Ketamine , Midazolam , Tears , Animals , Rabbits , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Ketamine/pharmacology , Butorphanol/administration & dosage , Butorphanol/pharmacology , Male , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Midazolam/pharmacology , Administration, Intranasal/veterinary , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Tears/drug effects , Injections, Intramuscular/veterinary , Cross-Over Studies , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Conscious Sedation/veterinaryABSTRACT
The decontamination process for plumage-contaminated wild birds, such as those affected by oil spills, is lengthy and involves manual restraint and manipulation of all body parts. Birds commonly react to this in ways that suggest they are extremely stressed (eg, struggling, vocalizing). We proposed to reduce stress during the wash process using sedation and hypothesized that the use of sedation would not negatively impact survival. Contaminated birds in need of washing were randomly selected to be either sedated (butorphanol 2 mg/kg IM + midazolam 1 mg/kg IM and flumazenil 0.1 mg/kg IM for reversal) or not sedated at 3 US rehabilitation centers over the course of 1 year. Response to sedation was rated on a scale of 0-4 with 0 as no effect to 4 as excessively sedate. Data such as cloacal temperatures at various time points, lengths of various portions of the wash process, preening behavior in the drying pen, and disposition were collected. No statistical differences were found between sedated and nonsedated birds for any of the data points collected, including survival. There was a significant association between birds with higher cloacal temperatures in the drying pen and with birds held longer in the drying pen with improved survival; however, these findings were unrelated to whether the birds were sedated. Our findings show that sedation with butorphanol 2 mg/ kg IM and midazolam 1 mg/kg IM reversed with flumazenil 0.1 mg/kg IM can be used during the wash process for wild birds without adverse effects. Careful attention must be given to heat support for all birds while drying to prevent hypothermia.
Subject(s)
Birds , Butorphanol , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Midazolam , Restraint, Physical , Animals , Restraint, Physical/veterinary , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Butorphanol/administration & dosage , Butorphanol/pharmacology , Midazolam/pharmacology , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Decontamination/methods , Animals, Wild , Flumazenil/pharmacology , Flumazenil/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sedatives are commonly used to promote sleep in intensive care unit patients. However, it is not clear whether sedation-induced states are similar to the biological sleep. We explored if sedative-induced states resemble biological sleep using multichannel electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. METHODS: Multichannel EEG datasets from two different sources were used in this study: (1) sedation dataset consisting of 102 healthy volunteers receiving propofol (N = 36), sevoflurane (N = 36), or dexmedetomidine (N = 30), and (2) publicly available sleep EEG dataset (N = 994). Forty-four quantitative time, frequency and entropy features were extracted from EEG recordings and were used to train the machine learning algorithms on sleep dataset to predict sleep stages in the sedation dataset. The predicted sleep states were then compared with the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation (MOAA/S) scores. RESULTS: The performance of the model was poor (AUC = 0.55-0.58) in differentiating sleep stages during propofol and sevoflurane sedation. In the case of dexmedetomidine, the AUC of the model increased in a sedation-dependent manner with NREM stages 2 and 3 highly correlating with deep sedation state reaching an AUC of 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: We addressed an important clinical question to identify biological sleep promoting sedatives using EEG signals. We demonstrate that propofol and sevoflurane do not promote EEG patterns resembling natural sleep while dexmedetomidine promotes states resembling NREM stages 2 and 3 sleep, based on current sleep staging standards.
Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine , Electroencephalography , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Machine Learning , Propofol , Sevoflurane , Sleep , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Male , Adult , Female , Sleep/drug effects , Sleep/physiology , Propofol/pharmacology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/pharmacology , Sevoflurane/adverse effects , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Sleep Stages/drug effects , Young AdultABSTRACT
The fragmentation of the functional brain network has been identified through the functional connectivity (FC) analysis in studies investigating anesthesia-induced loss of consciousness (LOC). However, it remains unclear whether mild sedation of anesthesia can cause similar effects. This paper aims to explore the changes in local-global brain network topology during mild anesthesia, to better understand the macroscopic neural mechanism underlying anesthesia sedation. We analyzed high-density EEG from 20 participants undergoing mild and moderate sedation of propofol anesthesia. By employing a local-global brain parcellation in EEG source analysis, we established binary functional brain networks for each participant. Furthermore, we investigated the global-scale properties of brain networks by estimating global efficiency and modularity, and examined the changes in meso-scale properties of brain networks by quantifying the distribution of high-degree and high-betweenness hubs and their corresponding rich-club coefficients. It is evident from the results that the mild sedation of anesthesia does not cause a significant change in the global-scale properties of brain networks. However, network components centered on SomMot L show a significant decrease, while those centered on Default L, Vis L and Limbic L exhibit a significant increase during the transition from wakefulness to mild sedation (p<0.05). Compared to the baseline state, mild sedation almost doubled the number of high-degree hubs in Vis L, DorsAttn L, Limbic L, Cont L, and reduced by half the number of high-degree hubs in SomMot R, DorsAttn R, SalVentAttn R. Further, mild sedation almost doubled the number of high-betweenness hubs in Vis L, Vis R, Limbic R, Cont R, and reduced by half the number of high-betweenness hubs in SomMot L, SalVentAttn L, Default L, and SomMot R. Our results indicate that mild anesthesia cannot affect the global integration and segregation of brain networks, but influence meso-scale function for integrating different resting-state systems involved in various segregation processes. Our findings suggest that the meso-scale brain network reorganization, situated between global integration and local segregation, could reflect the autonomic compensation of the brain for drug effects. As a direct response and adjustment of the brain network system to drug administration, this spontaneous reorganization of the brain network aims at maintaining consciousness in the case of sedation.
Subject(s)
Brain , Electroencephalography , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Nerve Net , Propofol , Humans , Propofol/administration & dosage , Adult , Male , Nerve Net/drug effects , Nerve Net/diagnostic imaging , Nerve Net/physiology , Female , Brain/drug effects , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiology , Electroencephalography/methods , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Young Adult , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Connectome/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine and propofol are common sedatives in intensive care units and for interventional procedures. Both may compromise sinus node function and atrioventricular conduction. The objective of this prospective, randomized study is to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine with propofol on sinus node function and atrioventricular conduction. METHODS: In a tertiary care center in Switzerland we included from September 2019 to October 2020 160 patients (65 ± 11 years old; 32% female) undergoing first ablation for atrial fibrillation by cryoballoon ablation or by radiofrequency ablation. Patients were randomly assigned to deep sedation with dexmedetomidine (DEX group) versus propofol (PRO group). A standard electrophysiological study was performed after pulmonary vein isolation with the patients still deeply sedated and hemodynamically stable. RESULTS: Eighty patients each were randomized to the DEX and PRO group. DEX group patients had higher baseline sinus cycle length (1022 vs. 1138 ms; p = 0.003) and longer sinus node recovery time (SNRT400; 1597 vs. 1412 ms; p = 0.042). However, both corrected SNRT and normalized SNRT did not differ. DEX group patients had longer PR interval (207 vs. 186 ms; p = 0.002) and AH interval (111 vs. 95 ms, p = 0.008), longer Wenckebach cycle length of the atrioventricular node (512 vs. 456 ms; p = 0.005), and longer atrioventricular node effective refractory period (390 vs. 344 ms; p = 0.009). QRS width and HV interval were not different. An arrhythmia, mainly atrial fibrillation, was induced in 33 patients during the electrophysiological study, without differences among groups (20% vs. 15%, p = 0.533). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine has a more pronounced slowing effect on sinus rate and suprahissian AV conduction than propofol, but not on infrahissian AV conduction and ventricular repolarization. These differences need to be taken into account when using these sedatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03844841, 19/02/2019.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Deep Sedation , Dexmedetomidine , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Propofol , Humans , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/pharmacology , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Deep Sedation/methods , Sinoatrial Node/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The main sedative which is propofol in painless gastroenteroscopy, has a high risk of reducing blood pressure and respiratory depression. Remimazolam (a short-acting benzodiazepine) is expected to be widely used in painless gastroenteroscopy due to its rapid onset, rapid metabolism and light respiratory and circulation inhibition. METHODS: A randomized, single-blind, parallel, controlled study, 123 outpatients who were undergoing painless colonoscopy and ramdomly divided into group A, B and C, in Hangzhou First People's Hospital, July-December 2021. All patients were intravenously injected with 5 µg sufentanil for analgesic preconditioning. The group A was induced by 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam besylate. The group B was induced by 0.25 mg/kg remimazolam besylate. And the group C was inducted by 2.0 mg /kg propofol. If the patients had limb movement or MOAA/S score > 3 and so on, remimazolam besylate was added at 2.5 mg/ time in group A and B, and propofol emulsion injection was added at 0.5 mg/kg/ time in group C. During the operation, according to the actual situation, remimazolam was per added 2.5 mg in the experimental group, and propofol was 0.5 mg/kg in the control group. Heart rate (HR), non-invasive blood pressure (BP), respiratory rate (RR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), and improved vigilance/sedation score (MOAA/S) of patients was recorded from entering endoscopy room to get out of the anesthesia recovery room, also including perioperative adverse events, other medications or treatments, the time of patients waking up and leaving the hospital. RESULTS: The successful rate of induction in three groups was 100%. There was no significant difference in the sedation completion rate among the three groups (Group A:90.2%, Group B: 92.7%, Group C: 92.7%, P = 1.000). The rate of adverse events after administration: group A(27.0%) and B(36.8%) both lower than group C(71.0%),P < 0.001;There was no significant difference between group A and group B, P > 0.744;The average time from the last drug administration to meet the discharge criteria of the subjects in three groups was as follows: The average time of group A(16.2 min) and Group B(16.5 min) both shorter than group C(19.6 min), P = 0.001; There was no significant difference between group A and group B, P = 0.742. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that remimazolam is a safe and effective medication for colonoscopy sedation, the security of remimazolam is better than propofol, and the sedative effect with the initial dose of 0.25 mg/kg of remimazolam is optimal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: China Clinical Trial Center with registration number: 2100052615,02/11/2021.
Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines , Colonoscopy , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Sufentanil , Humans , Male , Female , Single-Blind Method , Middle Aged , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Adult , Colonoscopy/methods , Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage , Sufentanil/administration & dosage , Sufentanil/pharmacology , Respiration/drug effects , AgedABSTRACT
Background: As a major animal control service provider in the city of Guelph and Wellington County in Ontario, the Guelph Humane Society transports and presents injured or ill raccoons requiring humane euthanasia to the Ontario Veterinary College Health Sciences Centre (OVC-HSC). Issues around handling, transportation, and delays before euthanasia have recently raised some concerns for welfare and the need for means of improving this process. Objective: Investigation of a noncontrolled sedation and analgesia protocol for injured or ill raccoons intended to improve animal welfare by allowing humane handling, transport, and euthanasia following administration by an animal protection officer (APO). Animals and procedure: Twenty-seven injured or ill raccoons requiring transport and euthanasia, as determined by the Guelph Humane Society APOs, were included in the study. Each raccoon was administered acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg), alfaxalone (4 mg/kg), and medetomidine (0.15 mg/kg), intramuscularly, before being transported to the OVC-HSC for humane euthanasia. Results: The combination of acepromazine, alfaxalone, and medetomidine was suitable for administration by APOs and provided the desired sedation depth to allow transport and humane euthanasia. Transit time was the only predictor of sedation depth upon arrival at the OVC-HSC. Two raccoons showed mild physical response to intracardiac injection for euthanasia. Numerical cutoff points of an in-hospital visual analog score of sedation of ≥ 70/100 and duration of sedation of < 62 min showed zero probability of response to euthanasia. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Administration of acepromazine, alfaxalone, and medetomidine at the stated doses provided acceptable sedation and analgesia to improve animal welfare during transport and eventual euthanasia of raccoons.
Évaluation d'un protocole médicamenteux sans groupe témoin de sédation intramusculaire, pré-euthanasie, comprenant de l'alfaxalone 4 %, de la médétomidine et de l'acépromazine pour les ratons laveurs blessés ou malades. Contexte: En tant que fournisseur majeur de services de contrôle des animaux dans la ville de Guelph et dans le comté de Wellington en Ontario, la Guelph Humane Society transporte et présente les ratons laveurs blessés ou malades nécessitant une euthanasie sans cruauté au Ontario Veterinary College Health Sciences Centre (OVC-HSC). Les problèmes liés à la manutention, au transport et aux délais avant l'euthanasie ont récemment soulevé des inquiétudes quant au bien-être et à la nécessité de trouver des moyens d'améliorer ce processus. Objectif: Enquête sur un protocole de sédation et d'analgésie sans groupe témoin pour les ratons laveurs blessés ou malades destiné à améliorer le bien-être des animaux en permettant une manipulation, un transport et une euthanasie sans cruauté après administration par un agent de protection des animaux (APO). Animaux et procédure: Vingt-sept ratons laveurs blessés ou malades nécessitant un transport et une euthanasie, tel que déterminé par les APO de la Guelph Humane Society, ont été inclus dans l'étude. Chaque raton laveur a reçu de l'acépromazine (0,05 mg/kg), de l'alfaxalone (4 mg/kg) et de la médétomidine (0,15 mg/kg), par voie intramusculaire, avant d'être transporté à l'OVC-HSC pour une euthanasie sans cruauté. Résultats: La combinaison d'acépromazine, d'alfaxalone et de médétomidine convenait à l'administration par un APO et fournissait la profondeur de sédation souhaitée pour permettre le transport et l'euthanasie sans cruauté. Le temps de transit était le seul prédicteur de la profondeur de la sédation à l'arrivée à l'OVC-HSC. Deux ratons laveurs ont montré une légère réponse physique à une injection intracardiaque pour l'euthanasie. Les seuils numériques d'un score analogique visuel de sédation à l'hôpital ≥ 70/100 et d'une durée de sédation < 62 min ont montré une probabilité nulle de réponse à l'euthanasie. Conclusion et pertinence clinique: L'administration d'acépromazine, d'alfaxalone et de médétomidine aux doses indiquées a fourni une sédation et une analgésie acceptables pour améliorer le bien-être des animaux pendant le transport et l'euthanasie éventuelle des ratons laveurs.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).
Subject(s)
Acepromazine , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Medetomidine , Pregnanediones , Raccoons , Animals , Medetomidine/administration & dosage , Pregnanediones/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Acepromazine/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Euthanasia, Animal , Injections, Intramuscular/veterinary , Animal WelfareABSTRACT
It is crucial to understand how anesthetics disrupt information transmission within the whole-brain network and its hub structure to gain insight into the network-level mechanisms underlying propofol-induced sedation. However, the influence of propofol on functional integration, segregation, and community structure of whole-brain networks were still unclear. We recruited 12 healthy subjects and acquired resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data during 5 different propofol-induced effect-site concentrations (CEs): 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 µg/ml. We constructed whole-brain functional networks for each subject under different conditions and identify community structures. Subsequently, we calculated the global and local topological properties of whole-brain network to investigate the alterations in functional integration and segregation with deepening propofol sedation. Additionally, we assessed the alteration of key nodes within the whole-brain community structure at each effect-site concentrations level. We found that global participation was significantly increased at high effect-site concentrations, which was mediated by bilateral postcentral gyrus. Meanwhile, connector hubs appeared and were located in posterior cingulate cortex and precentral gyrus at high effect-site concentrations. Finally, nodal participation coefficients of connector hubs were closely associated to the level of sedation. These findings provide valuable insights into the relationship between increasing propofol dosage and enhanced functional interaction within the whole-brain networks.
Subject(s)
Brain , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Propofol , Humans , Propofol/pharmacology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Male , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Brain/drug effects , Brain/physiology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Female , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Young Adult , Nerve Net/drug effects , Nerve Net/diagnostic imaging , Nerve Net/physiology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Brain Mapping/methodsABSTRACT
Zolpidem, a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic, is primarily used to treat insomnia. In a previous study, pior treatment with non-benzodiazepine receptor agonists was associated with inflammation. The present study aimed to clarify the association between the effects of zolpidem and inflammation in mice treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a known model of inflammation. We assessed the zolpidem-induced loss of righting reflex (LORR) duration 24 h after LPS treatment in mice. Additionally, the expressions of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor subunit and K+-Cl- cotransporter isoform 2 (KCC2) mRNA in the hippocampus and frontal cortex were examined in LPS-treated mice. Pretreatment with LPS was associated with significantly prolonged duration of zolpidem-induced LORR compared to control mice. This effect was significantly attenuated by administering bicuculline, a GABAA receptor antagonist, or flumazenil, a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, in LPS-treated mice. Compared to controls, LPS-treated mice showed no significant change in the expression of GABAA receptor subunits in the hippocampus or frontal cortex. Bumetanide, an Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter isoform 1 blocker, attenuated the extended duration of zolpidem-induced LORR observed in LPS-treated mice. LPS significantly decreased Kcc2 mRNA expression in the hippocampus and the frontal cortex. These findings suggest that inflammation increases zolpidem-induced LORR, possibly through a reduction in KCC2 expression.
Subject(s)
Lipopolysaccharides , Pyridines , Receptors, GABA-A , Reflex, Righting , Symporters , Zolpidem , Animals , Zolpidem/pharmacology , Mice , Pyridines/pharmacology , Male , Receptors, GABA-A/metabolism , Receptors, GABA-A/drug effects , Symporters/genetics , Symporters/metabolism , Reflex, Righting/drug effects , Hippocampus/drug effects , Hippocampus/metabolism , K Cl- Cotransporters , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Inflammation/chemically induced , Frontal Lobe/drug effects , Frontal Lobe/metabolismABSTRACT
Several studies have demonstrated the correlation between Doppler velocimetric parameters of testicular artery and semen quality in domestic species, but in felines data are scarce. This study aimed to correlate the Doppler velocimetry of the testicular artery with sperm kinetics and sperm defects, in sedated and non-sedated cats. Forty tomcats were divided into two groups: sedated (SG; n=20) with dexmedetomidine (10⯵m/kg) and ketamine (12â¯mg/kg), and non-sedated (NSG; n=20). The animals were subjected to ultrasound Doppler velocimetry of the distal supratesticular and marginal region of the testicular artery and subsequently orchiectomized. Epididymal tail spermatozoa were recovered and analyzed using a CASA system for motility, and morphology took place. Animals of SG presented a significantly higher velocity in the marginal region of the cat's testicular artery [peak systolic velocity (PSV) 11.51â¯cm/s; end-diastolic velocity (EDV) 7.72â¯cm/s] compared to NSG (PSV 7.72â¯cm/s, P < 0.001; EDV 4.93â¯cm/s, P < 0.001). Sedated cats presented higher pulsatility and resistivity indexes than non-sedated cats. The supratesticular PSV of NSG was moderately correlated with major (rs = 0621; P < 0.001) and total sperm defects (rs = 0614; P < 0001). Doppler velocimetry was fairly correlated with minor, major, and total sperm defects. In conclusion, Doppler velocimetric evaluation emerges as an important possibility in the reproductive evaluation of tomcats, once the testicular artery hemodynamics were associated with sperm defects. However, it is advisable to carry out this evaluation in non-sedated animals. If sedation is necessary, peripheral vasoconstriction should be considered.
Subject(s)
Arteries , Testis , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Animals , Male , Cats , Testis/blood supply , Testis/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler/veterinary , Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Arteries/physiology , Spermatozoa/physiology , Semen Analysis/veterinary , Blood Flow Velocity , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Sperm Motility , Ketamine/pharmacology , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: When inhalant anesthetic equipment is not available or during upper airway surgery, intravenous infusion of one or more drugs are commonly used to induce and/or maintain general anesthesia. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) does not require endotracheal intubation, which may be more difficult to achieve in rabbits. A range of different injectable drug combinations have been used as continuous infusion rate in animals. Recently, a combination of ketamine and propofol (ketofol) has been used for TIVA in both human patients and animals. The purpose of this prospective, blinded, randomized, crossover study was to evaluate anesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of ketofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in combination with constant rate infusion (CRI) of midazolam, fentanyl or dexmedetomidine in eight New Zealand White rabbits. Following IV induction with ketofol and endotracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with ketofol infusion in combination with CRIs of midazolam (loading dose [LD]: 0.3 mg/kg; CRI: 0.3 mg/kg/hr; KPM), fentanyl (LD: 6 µg/kg; CRI: 6 µg/kg/hr; KPF) or dexmedetomidine (LD: 3 µg/kg; CRI: 3 µg/kg/hr; KPD). Rabbits in the control treatment (KPS) were administered the same volume of saline for LD and CRI. Ketofol infusion rate (initially 0.6 mg kg- 1 minute- 1 [0.3 mg kg- 1 minute- 1 of each drug]) was adjusted to suppress the pedal withdrawal reflex. Ketofol dose and physiologic variables were recorded every 5 min. RESULTS: Ketofol induction doses were 14.9 ± 1.8 (KPM), 15.0 ± 1.9 (KPF), 15.5 ± 2.4 (KPD) and 14.7 ± 3.4 (KPS) mg kg- 1 and did not differ among treatments (p > 0.05). Ketofol infusion rate decreased significantly in rabbits in treatments KPM and KPD as compared with saline. Ketofol maintenance dose in rabbits in treatments KPM (1.0 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min) and KPD (1.0 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min) was significantly lower as compared to KPS (1.3 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min) treatment (p < 0.05). Ketofol maintenance dose did not differ significantly between treatments KPF (1.1 ± 0.3 mg/kg/min) and KPS (1.3 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min). Cardiovascular variables remained at clinically acceptable values but ketofol infusion in combination with fentanyl CRI was associated with severe respiratory depression. CONCLUSIONS: At the studied doses, CRIs of midazolam and dexmedetomidine, but not fentanyl, produced ketofol-sparing effect in rabbits. Mechanical ventilation should be considered during ketofol anesthesia, particularly when fentanyl CRI is used.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Intravenous , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Cross-Over Studies , Dexmedetomidine , Fentanyl , Ketamine , Midazolam , Propofol , Animals , Rabbits , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Midazolam/pharmacology , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Ketamine/pharmacology , Anesthesia, Intravenous/veterinary , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Male , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Prospective Studies , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Anesthetics, Combined/administration & dosage , Infusions, Intravenous/veterinary , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sclareol (SCL), a labdane diterpene compound found in Salvia sclarea L., exhibited therapeutic effects. This study investigated the potential interaction between SCL and diazepam (DZP) in modulating sedation in the thiopental sodium-induced sleeping animal model, supported by in-silico molecular docking analysis. METHODS: The control, sclareol (5, 10 and 20â¯mg/kg), and the reference drugs [diazepam: 3â¯mg/kg and Caffeine (CAF): 10â¯mg/kg] were used in male albino mice. Then, sodium thiopental (40â¯mg/kg, i.p.) was administrated to induce sleep. The latent period, percentage of sleep incidence and modulation of latency were measured. Further, homology modeling of human γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) was conducted examine the binding mode of GABA interaction with SCL, DZP, and CAF compounds RESULTS: SCL (low dose) slightly increased the sleep latency, while the higher dose significantly prolonged sleep latency. DZP, a GABAA receptor agonist, exhibited strong sleep-inducing properties, reducing sleep latency, and increasing sleeping time. Caffeine (CAF) administration prolonged sleep latency and reduced sleeping time, consistent with its stimulant effects. The combination treatments involving SCL, DZP, and CAF showed mixed effects on sleep parameters. The molecular docking revealed good binding affinities of SCL, DZP, and CAF for GABAA receptor subunits A2 and A5. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted the complex interplay between SCL, DZP, and CAF in regulating sleep behaviors and provided insights into potential combination therapies for sleep disorders.
Subject(s)
Diazepam , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Molecular Docking Simulation , Sleep , Thiopental , Animals , Male , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Mice , Diazepam/pharmacology , Sleep/drug effects , Thiopental/pharmacology , Diterpenes/pharmacology , Caffeine/pharmacology , Computer Simulation , Receptors, GABA-A/metabolism , Humans , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Sleep Latency/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists (α2-agonists) are widely used in animals as sedatives and for pre-anaesthetic medication. Medetomidine has often been given subcutaneously (SC) to rats, although its absorption rate is slow and the individual variation in serum drug concentrations is high via this route. In addition, α2-agonists have various effects on metabolic and endocrine functions such as hypoinsulinaemia, hyperglycaemia and diuresis. Vatinoxan is a peripherally acting α2-adrenoceptor antagonist that, as a hydrophilic molecule, does not cross the blood-brain barrier in significant quantities and thus alleviates peripheral cardiovascular effects and adverse metabolic effects of α2-agonists. Aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of vatinoxan on sedation, blood glucose concentration, voiding and heart and respiratory rates and arterial oxygen saturation in rats sedated with subcutaneous medetomidine, midazolam and fentanyl. RESULTS: Onset of sedation and loss of righting reflex occurred significantly faster with vatinoxan [5.35 ± 1.08 (mean ± SD) versus 12.97 ± 6.18 min and 6.53 ± 2.18 versus 14.47 ± 7.28 min, respectively]. No significant differences were detected in heart and respiratory rates and arterial oxygen saturation between treatments. Blood glucose concentration (18.3 ± 3.6 versus 11.8 ± 1.2 mmol/L) and spontaneous urinary voiding [35.9 (15.1-41.6), range (median) versus 0.9 (0-8.0) mL /kg/min] were significantly higher without vatinoxan. CONCLUSIONS: Acceleration of induction of sedation, alleviation of hyperglycaemia and prevention of profuse diuresis by vatinoxan may be beneficial when sedating rats for clinical and experimental purposes with subcutaneous medetomidine, midazolam and fentanyl.
Subject(s)
Fentanyl , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Medetomidine , Midazolam , Animals , Medetomidine/pharmacology , Medetomidine/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Rats , Male , Midazolam/pharmacology , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Quinolizines/pharmacology , Quinolizines/administration & dosage , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Rats, WistarABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine anesthetic/sedative, designed as a rapidly metabolized carboxylic acid. Since its recent launch, the role of remimazolam in modern anesthesia and sedation practice is still evolving. This review aims to outline the clinical pharmacology and clinical utility of remimazolam to elucidate its potential advantages and limitations. RECENT FINDINGS: Remimazolam is "short-acting" but not ultra-short-acting compared with propofol based on context-sensitive decrement times. But compared to propofol, the availability of the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, is considered an advantage, particularly in certain emergency situations such as in patients with difficult airways. However, because flumazenil is shorter acting than remimazolam when remimazolam accumulates or is present in a high concentration, the reappearance of remimazolam sedation may occur after the initial reversal of anesthesia/sedation from flumazenil administration. Although it is beneficial that remimazolam causes less respiratory depression and hypotension than propofol, serious respiratory depression and hypotension can still occur. Remimazolam administration causes minimal or no pain on injection. Remimazolam is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting than inhaled anesthetics, but propofol is clearly superior in this regard. The anesthetic/sedative effects may be prolonged by severe hepatic impairment; remimazolam tolerance can occur in long-term benzodiazepine users. SUMMARY: Remimazolam may be beneficial to use in procedural sedation and general anesthesia for patients with difficult airways or hemodynamic instability. Further clinical studies with remimazolam are warranted to identify the potential benefits in other settings and patient populations.
Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Humans , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Flumazenil/pharmacology , Propofol/adverse effects , Propofol/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Methaqualone, a quinazolinone marketed commercially as Quaalude, is a central nervous system depressant that was used clinically as a sedative-hypnotic, then became a notorious recreational drug in the 1960s-80s. Due to its high abuse potential, medical use of methaqualone was eventually prohibited, yet it persists as a globally abused substance. Methaqualone principally targets GABAA receptors, which are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter-gated ion channels in the brain. The restricted status and limited accessibility of methaqualone have contributed to its pharmacology being understudied. Here, we use cryo-EM to localize the GABAA receptor binding sites of methaqualone and its more potent derivative, PPTQ, to the same intersubunit transmembrane sites targeted by the general anesthetics propofol and etomidate. Both methaqualone and PPTQ insert more deeply into subunit interfaces than the previously-characterized modulators. Binding of quinazolinones to this site results in widening of the extracellular half of the ion-conducting pore, following a trend among positive allosteric modulators in destabilizing the hydrophobic activation gate in the pore as a mechanism for receptor potentiation. These insights shed light on the underexplored pharmacology of quinazolinones and further elucidate the molecular mechanisms of allosteric GABAA receptor modulation through transmembrane binding sites.
Subject(s)
Cryoelectron Microscopy , Receptors, GABA-A , Receptors, GABA-A/metabolism , Receptors, GABA-A/chemistry , Binding Sites , Humans , Animals , Etomidate/pharmacology , Etomidate/analogs & derivatives , Propofol/pharmacology , Propofol/chemistry , Quinazolinones/pharmacology , Quinazolinones/chemistry , Allosteric Regulation/drug effects , HEK293 Cells , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Exposure to general anesthetics can adversely affect brain development, but there is little study of sedative agents used in intensive care that act via similar pharmacologic mechanisms. Using quantitative immunohistochemistry and neurobehavioral testing and an established protocol for murine sedation, we tested the hypothesis that lengthy, repetitive exposure to midazolam, a commonly used sedative in pediatric intensive care, interferes with neuronal development and subsequent cognitive function via actions on the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. We found that mice in the midazolam sedation group exhibited a chronic, significant increase in the expression of mTOR activity pathway markers in comparison to controls. Furthermore, both neurobehavioral outcomes, deficits in Y-maze and fear-conditioning performance, and neuropathologic effects of midazolam sedation exposure, including disrupted dendritic arborization and synaptogenesis, were ameliorated via treatment with rapamycin, a pharmacologic mTOR pathway inhibitor. We conclude that prolonged, repetitive exposure to midazolam sedation interferes with the development of neural circuitry via a pathologic increase in mTOR pathway signaling during brain development that has lasting consequences for both brain structure and function.