Complications Following Intraosseous Injections of Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement in Subchondroplasty.

An alternative approach to the major problem of osteoarthritis that has begun to pique the interest of researchers focuses on the pathology of the subchondral bone, its constant cross-talk with the articular cartilage, and its interaction with the joint. The presence of bone marrow lesions, detectable on MRI scans, has proven to be a cause of pain as well as a predictor of the progression of degenerative changes. Subchondroplasty is a relatively new surgical procedure for the treatment of these lesions, in which injectable calcium phosphate bone cement is infused into the affected area percutaneously, under fluoroscopic guidance. In its use as a synthetic scaffold, calcium phosphate bone cement exhibits considerable osteoconductivity, bioabsorbability, and low toxicity, thus showing great potential for restoring subchondral biomechanical properties through structural remodeling. Although published results appear quite promising, there are certain complications that the surgeon should be aware of. We reviewed the published data regarding complications of the procedure, highlighting possible causes according to these data, and suggesting safety measures. Avascular necrosis of the talus is the most reported concern. Postsurgical pain, infection, and continuous wound drainage due to bone substitute material extravasation to the joint or soft tissue are also mentioned, necessitating further standardization of the procedure. There are no reports of permanent postoperative disability or fatal outcomes.

Pseudoseptic arthritis as a complication of intra-articular infiltration of hyaluronic acid in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis.

Pseudoseptic arthritis is a rare complication of hyaluronic acid (HA) injections that often is difficult to differentiate from septic arthritis. Patients present acute pain, swelling and joint effusion normally around 24h after the second or third HA infiltration. We describe a female patient with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis and flare-ups of knee arthritis with pseudoseptic features in the past, who develops pseudoseptic arthritis of the knee following her first injection of hyaluronic acid.

Injections of the Hip and Knee.

Hip and knee injections are useful diagnostic and therapeutic tools for family physicians. This article reviews anatomic landmark-guided and ultrasound-guided injections and aspiration techniques for greater trochanteric pain syndrome, the hip joint, the knee joint, the pes anserine bursa, and the iliotibial band. Indications for injections include acute and chronic inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis; osteoarthritis; overuse; and traumas. Joint aspirations may be performed to aid in the diagnosis of unexplained effusions and to relieve pain. Technique, injectant, and follow-up timing depend on the physician's comfort, experience, and preference. Infections of the skin or soft tissue are the primary contraindications to injections. The most common complications are local inflammatory reactions to the injectant. These reactions usually cause soreness for 24 to 48 hours, then spontaneously resolve. Follow-up after injections is usually scheduled within two to six weeks.

Tuina Intervention in Sodium Monoiodoacetate Injection-Induced Rat Model of Knee Osteoarthritis.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), a common degenerative joint disorder, is characterized by chronic pain and disability, which can progress to irreparable structural damage of the joint. Investigations into the link between articular cartilage, muscles, synovium, and other tissues surrounding the knee joint in KOA are of great importance. Currently, managing KOA includes lifestyle modifications, exercise, medication, and surgical interventions; however, the elucidation of the intricate mechanisms underlying KOA-related pain is still lacking. Consequently, KOA pain remains a key clinical challenge and a therapeutic priority. Tuina has been found to have a regulatory effect on the motor, immune, and endocrine systems, prompting the exploration of whether Tuina could alleviate KOA symptoms, caused by the upregulation of inflammatory factors, and further, if the inflammatory factors in skeletal muscle can augment the progression of KOA. We randomized 32 male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (180-220 g) into four groups of eight animals each: antiPD-L1+Tuina (group A), model (group B), Tuina (group C), and sham surgery (group D). For groups A, B, and C, we injected 25 µL of sodium monoiodoacetate (MIA) solution (4 mg MIA diluted in 25 µL of sterile saline solution) into the right knee joint cavity, and for group D, the same amount of sterile physiological saline was injected. All the groups were evaluated using the least to most stressful tests (paw mechanical withdrawal threshold, paw withdrawal thermal latency, swelling of the right knee joint, Lequesne MG score, skin temperature) before injection and 2, 9, and 16 days after injection.

Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections Within 4 Weeks of Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures Are Associated With Increased Postoperative Infection Rates.

PURPOSE: To refine the understanding of the effect of timing of corticosteroid injections (CSIs) and shoulder arthroscopy on postoperative infection. METHODS: An insurance database was used to determine all patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for a 5-year period with an associated preoperative ipsilateral corticosteroid injection. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on timing of preoperative CSI: (1) 0-<2 weeks, (2) 2-<4 weeks, (3) 4-<6 weeks, and (4) 6-<8 weeks. Patients were pooled to include all patients who had a CSI less than 4 weeks and those longer than 4 weeks. A cohort of patients who never had a corticosteroid injection before undergoing arthroscopy were used as a control. All patients had a follow-up of 2 years. Multivariable regression analyses were performed using R Studio with significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression showed a greater odds ratio (OR) for postoperative infection in patients who received CSI 0-<2 weeks before shoulder arthroscopy at 90 days (3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-5.57, P < .001), 1 year (2.51, 95% CI 1.46-4.12, P < .001), and 2 years (2.08, 95% CI 1.27-3.28, P = .002) compared with the control group. Patients who received CSI 2-<4 weeks before shoulder arthroscopy had greater OR for infection at 90 days (2.26, 95% CI 1.28-3.83, P = .03), 1 year (1.82, 95% CI 1.13-2,82, P = .01), and 2 years (1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.47, P = .012). Patients who received CSI after 4 weeks had similar ORs of infection at 90 days (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.78-1.69, P = .48) 1 year (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.85-1.63 P = .33), and 2 years (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83-1.42, P = .54), compared with the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows the postoperative infection risk is greatest when CSIs are given within 2 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy, whereas CSIs given within 2-<4 weeks also portend increased risk, albeit to a lesser degree. The risk of postoperative infection is not significantly increased when CSIs are given more than 1 month before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative, prognosis study.

Predictive Factors of Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections With Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Capsule Approach for Patients With Primary Adhesive Capsulitis.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis affects the shoulder joint, causing pain and limiting motion. In clinical practice, the effectiveness of injections varies, and the factors influencing their success remain unclear. This study investigates the predictors of effective corticosteroid injections in patients with primary adhesive capsulitis. DESIGN: This retrospective study enrolled adhesive capsulitis patients older than 35 yrs who received intra-articular corticosteroid injections. The response was determined based on patients' pain and range of motion 3 mos after the injection. Demographic data, medical comorbidities, and radiographic parameters (critical shoulder angle and acromial index) were compared between the effective and noneffective groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression were used to identify the predictors of injection effectiveness. RESULTS: This study included 325 patients with primary adhesive capsulitis, who were divided into responder (189 patients, 58.2%) and nonresponder (136 patients, 41.8%) groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the acromial index score indicated favorable discrimination for predicting a poor response to injections, whereas the critical shoulder angle score did not. Logistic regression revealed that the pain period, diabetes mellitus, and acromial index are predictors of nonresponders to injections. CONCLUSIONS: Long pain duration, the presence of diabetes mellitus, and an acromial index score greater than 0.711 were predictors of nonresponse to corticosteroid injections for primary adhesive capsulitis patients.

Injections prior to hip arthroscopy are associated with increased risk of repeat hip arthroscopy at 1 and 5 years.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that intra-articular hip injections prior to hip arthroscopy (HA) can be a helpful diagnostic tool. However, local anesthetic and corticosteroid injections can be chondrotoxic and corticosteroid injections have been shown to increase the risk of infection during subsequent surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative injections adversely affect outcomes of HA using a national database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The TriNetX database was retrospectively queried. Patients undergoing HA for femoroacetabular impingement with at least 1 year of claims runout were included in the analysis. Patients were grouped by whether they had a hip injection within 1 year prior to HA. The rates of repeat HA, total hip arthroplasty (THA), infection, osteonecrosis, and new onset hip OA at 1- and 5-years postoperatively were compared between groups. Statistical significance was assessed at α = 0.05. RESULTS: 6511 HA patients with previous injection and 1178 HA patients without previous injection were included. Patients with a previous injection were overall younger (32.3 vs. 34.7 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be female (69 vs. 48%, p < 0.001) and had a higher BMI (26.3 vs. 25.7 kg/m2, p = 0.043). At 1 and 5-years postoperatively, patients with any injection were 1.43 (p < 0.001) and 1.89 (p < 0.001) times more likely to undergo repeat HA, respectively. At 1 and 5-years postoperatively, patients who underwent a corticosteroid injection were 2.29 (p < 0.001) and 1.89 (p < 0.001) times more likely to undergo repeat HA than patients with local anesthetic injection only and 1.56 (p < 0.001) and 2.08 (p < 0.001) times more likely to undergo repeat HA than patients with no injection. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarticular hip injections prior to hip arthroscopy, particularly corticosteroid injections, are associated with increased risk of repeat hip arthroscopy at 1 and 5 years. Additional studies are needed to elucidate this risk.

Pain management following simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: genicular nerve blockade versus periarticular injection.

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the analgesic solution prepared for periarticular injection (PAI) could be utilized as a genicular nerve blockade (GNB) agent in bilateral knee arthroplasty, and to assess the pain control efficacy of this approach in comparison with PAI. This was a retrospective cohort in which patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were evaluated. Thirty patients were enrolled. The standard PAI was used for one knee, while the PAI solution was applied in the form of GNB to the other. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores were measured and recorded separately for each knee, at rest (static) and during exercise (dynamic). Active range of joint motion (JRM) for both knee joints was measured preoperatively, at postoperatively. Compared to the PAI group, the GNB group had lower VAS scores at 2 and 8 hours (p = 0.030 and p < 0.001, respectively). The GNB group also had lower dynamic VAS scores at 2, 8, and 24 hours (p = 0.009, p <0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Static and dynamic VAS measurements did not demonstrate any differences between groups (GNB vs. PAI) at 48 hours and 30 days (p>0.05). When the reduction in VAS scores was assessed, we found that the decrease in both scores was significantly greater in the PAI group compared to the GNB group (p<0.001, for both). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to drainage volume, complications and JRM (p>0.05). GNB was found to be more effective for pain control throughout the first postoperative day in patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA.

Predictors of Outcomes After Lumbar Intra-Articular Facet Joint Injections and Medial Branch Blocks: A Scoping Review.

STUDY DESIGN: A scoping review. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify and describe the factors associated with the patient-reported response after lumbar intra-articular facet joint (FJ) injections or medial branch blocks (MBBs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: FJ osteoarthritis is among the most common causes of chronic low back pain. Management often includes FJ intra-articular injection and MBBs (which may be followed by radiofrequency ablation of the nerves innervating these joints). However, the success of these approaches is variable, prompting interest in identifying patient characteristics (imaging features, clinical signs, and among others) associated with response to these types of facet injections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search on factors associated with patient-reported outcomes after lumbar FJ intra-articular injections or MBBs for patients with low back pain published in English or Spanish between 2000 and 2023. We excluded duplicate papers that did not describe factors associated with outcomes or those describing other interventions. We collected data on the association of these factors with patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. These studies evaluated factors, such as age, depression, and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and among variables. Age and imaging findings of facet arthropathy were the most frequently described factors. Imaging findings of FJ arthropathy and positive SPECT were often associated with positive results after intra-articular FJ injections or MBBs. In contrast, younger age and smoking were frequently associated with less favorable clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Numerous factors were considered in the 37 studies included in this review. Imaging findings of facet arthropathy, duration of pain, and positive SPECT were consistently associated with favorable results after facet interventions.

Non-operative management of shoulder osteoarthritis: Current concepts.

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. Conservative treatment options include physical therapy, pharmacological therapy, and biological therapy. Patients with glenohumeral OA present shoulder pain and decreased shoulder range of motion (ROM). Abnormal scapular motion is also seen in patients as adaptation to the restricted glenohumeral motion. Physical therapy is performed to (1) decrease pain, (2) increase shoulder ROM, and (3) protect the glenohumeral joint. To decrease pain, it should be assessed whether the pain appears at rest or during shoulder motion. Physical therapy may be effective for motion pain rather than rest pain. To increase shoulder ROM, the soft tissues responsible for the ROM loss need to be identified and targeted for intervention. To protect the glenohumeral joint, rotator cuff strengthening exercises are recommended. Administration of pharmacological agents is the major part next to physical therapy in the conservative treatment. The main aim of pharmacological treatment is the reduction of pain and diminution of inflammation in the joint. To achieve this aim, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended as first-line therapy. Additionally, the supplementation of oral vitamin C and vitamin D can help to slow down cartilage degeneration. Depending on the individual comorbidities and contraindications, sufficient medication with good pain reduction is thus possible for each patient. This interrupts the chronic inflammatory state in the joint and, in turn, enables pain-free physical therapy. Biologics such as platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and mesenchymal stem cells have gathered increased attention. Good clinical outcomes have been reported, but we need to be aware that these options are helpful in decreasing shoulder pain but neither stopping the progression nor improving OA. Further evidence of biologics needs to be obtained to determine their effectiveness. In athletes, a combined approach of activity modification and physical therapy can be effective. Oral medications can provide patients with transient pain relief. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection, which provides longer-term effects, must be used cautiously in athletes. There is mixed evidence for the efficacy of hyaluronic acid injections. There is still limited evidence regarding the use of biologics.

Safety of intra-articular glucocorticoid injections - state of the art.

Intra-articular glucocorticoid injection (IAGCI) is frequently used to treat joint pain and inflammation. While its efficacy has been extensively studied, there are not as many detailed descriptions regarding safety. This review aimed to describe the immediate-, short- and long-term complications of IAGCI and their predictors. Most studies mainly report mild and self-limited adverse events with an incidence similar to placebo. However, the reported incidences vary significantly and are mostly inferred from retrospective data. Septic arthritis is the most feared adverse event due to its association with high mortality. Other short-term local complications include injection site pain, post-injection flare, skin hypopigmentation and atrophy, and tendon rupture. Systemic side effects are common, including vasovagal reactions, flushing, increased appetite and mood changes, hyperglycemia in diabetic patients, and bleeding in high-risk patients. Few predictors of complications have been systematically evaluated. However, male gender, advanced age, and pre-existing joint disease have been suggested in retrospective studies to correlate with infection risk. Overall, in most studies, only severe adverse event rates are reported, with no systematic prospective evaluations of safety and no report of predictors of complications. Therefore, since IAGCI is a routinely used treatment, more detailed knowledge of adverse events and complications is warranted.

Preoperative intra-articular steroid injections within 3 months increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Albeit with no disease-modifying effects, intra-articular steroid injections (IASIs) are still widely used to relieve symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Previous literature has reported conflicting results regarding the safety of IASI in terms of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study tried to determine whether preoperative IASIs increased the risk of PJI, with different time intervals between the injections and surgery. METHODS: A computerized search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published before October 2022, which investigated the PJI rates of patients who received IASIs before TKA and patients who did not. The primary outcome was the association between preoperative IASI and PJI in TKA. The time point from which IASIs could be applied without risking PJI was also assessed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, with 113,032 patients in the IASI group and 256,987 patients in the control group, were included. The pooled odds ratio of PJI was 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.27, p = 0.05), indicating no increased risk of PJI. With the time interval < 6 months, the pooled odds ratio was 1.19 (95% CI 0.99-1.43, p = 0.06). However, with the time interval < 3 months, the pooled odds ratio was 1.26 (95% CI 1.06-1.50, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: IASI is not a safe procedure for patients who are expected to undergo TKA. The time interval between the injections and surgery was an important factor in assessing the safety of IASI. Preoperative injections that were applied within 3 months increased the risk of PJI in TKA.

Intravenous Injection of Equine Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Dogs with Articular Pain and Lameness: A Feasibility Study.

Osteoarthritis is a frequently occurring joint disorder in veterinary practice. Current treatments are focused on pain and inflammation; however, these are not able to reverse the pathological condition. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could provide an interesting alternative because of their immunomodulatory properties. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of a single intravenous (IV) injection of xenogeneic equine peripheral blood-derived MSCs (epbMSCs) as treatment for articular pain and lameness. Patients with chronic articular pain were injected intravenously with epbMSCs. They were evaluated at three time points (baseline and two follow-ups) by a veterinarian based on an orthopedic joint assessment and an owner canine brief pain inventory scoring. Thirty-five dogs were included in the safety and efficacy evaluation of the study. Results showed that the epbMSC therapy was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events and no increase in articular heat or pain. A significant improvement in lameness, range of motion, joint effusion, pain severity, and interference scores was found 6 weeks post-treatment compared with baseline. This study demonstrates that future research on IV administration of epbMSCs is warranted to further explore its possible beneficial effects in dogs with chronic articular pain and lameness. Clinical Trial gov ID: EC_2018_002.

Arthroscopic synovectomy versus intra-articular injection of corticosteroids for the management of refractory psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ARCTIC trial).

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are inflammatory diseases that often affect the wrist and, when affected, can lead to impaired wrist function and progressive joint destruction if inadequately treated. Standard care consists primarily of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), often supported by systemic corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI). IACSI, despite their use worldwide, show poor response in a substantial group of patients. Arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist is the surgical removal of synovitis with the goal to relieve pain and improve wrist function. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate wrist function following arthroscopic synovectomy compared to IACSI in therapy-resistant patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis. Secondary objectives include radiologic progress, disease activity, health-related quality of life, work participation and cost-effectiveness during a 1-year follow-up. METHODS: This protocol describes a prospective, randomized controlled trial. RA and PsA patients are eligible with prominent wrist synovitis objectified by a rheumatologist, not responding to at least 3 months of conventional DMARDs and naïve to biological DMARDs. For 90% power, an expected loss to follow-up of 5%, an expected difference in mean Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE, range 0-100) of 11 and α = 0.05, a total sample size of 80 patients will be sufficient to detect an effect size. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio for arthroscopic synovectomy with deposition of corticosteroids or for IACSI. Removed synovial tissue will be stored for an ancillary study on disease profiling. The primary outcome is wrist function, measured with the PRWE score after 3 months. Secondary outcomes include wrist mobility and grip strength, pain scores, DAS28, EQ-5D-5L, disease progression on ultrasound and radiographs, complications and secondary treatment. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed, based on healthcare costs (iMCQ questionnaire) and productivity loss (iPCQ questionnaire). Follow-up will be scheduled at 3, 6 and 12 months. Patient burden is minimized by combining study visits with regular follow-ups. DISCUSSION: Persistent wrist arthritis continues to be a problem for patients with rheumatic joint disease leading to disability. This is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect, safety and feasibility of arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist in these patients compared to IACSI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial registry (CCMO), NL74744.100.20. Registered on 30 November 2020. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT04755127. Registered after the start of inclusion on 15 February 2021.

Intra-articular and soft-tissue corticosteroid injections and risk of infections: Population-based self-controlled-risk-interval design.

PURPOSE: Chronic and short-term treatment with oral corticosteroids is associated with an increased risk of infection. However, the potential risk of infection that may be associated with intra-articular and soft-tissue injections of corticosteroids has not been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the risk for infection following intra-articular or soft-tissue corticosteroid injections. METHODS: Self-controlled-risk-interval study with 15 732 adults who were treated with intra-articular or soft-tissue corticosteroid injections during 2015-2018. The study was conducted in a large Israeli Health Maintenance Organization. We self-matched the participants and analyzed the incidence of infection over three periods: an exposure-period of 90 days following the injection, and two 90-day control periods. We identified the occurrence of several common infections in the patient's electronic medical record and analyzed the incidence rates of all infections (composite end-point) as well as each infection separately. RESULTS: The incidence of any infection was higher during postexposure period compared with the control periods (46.5 vs. 42.1 events per 1000 persons), number needed to harm was 227 persons. Self-matching analysis showed increased incidence-rate-ratio (IRR) for the combined incidence of infections in the post-exposure period compared with the control periods (IRR = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.21). A sensitivity analysis showed that the highest IRR was during the first 30 days (IRR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.38), with higher IRR for patients aged 65 years and older (IRR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.08-1.73). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular and soft-tissue corticosteroids injections may be associated with an increased risk of infections; however, the absolute risk increase is low.

Infection Risk Increases After Total Hip Arthroplasty Within 3 Months Following Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection. A Meta-Analysis on Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Much debate continues regarding the risk of postoperative infection after intra-articular corticosteroid injection prior to total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or other complications after joint arthroplasty in patients who received preoperative corticosteroids injections. METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library through January 4, 2022. Of 4,596 studies, 28 studies on 480,532 patients were selected for qualitative analysis. Studies describing patients receiving corticosteroids injections before joint arthroplasty (hip, knee) were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis was performed of studies focusing on corticosteroids injections and PJI. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence was based on the "Downs and Black's Checklist for Measuring Quality". RESULTS: A significant association (odds ratio: 1.55, P = .001, 95% confidence interval: 1.357-1.772) between PJI and corticosteroids injections was found for total hip arthroplasty (THA). No association was found for knee arthroplasty procedures. The risk of PJI is statistically higher (odds ratio: 1.20, P = .045, 95% confidence interval: 1.058-1.347) if the injections are performed within 3 months preoperatively in THA patients. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing THA who previously received intra-articular injections of corticosteroids may expect a statistically higher risk of developing PJI. On the contrary, no association between corticosteroids injections and PJI could be seen in total knee arthroplasty patients. In addition, injection timing plays an important role: surgeons should refrain from administering corticosteroids injections within 3 months before hip arthroplasty, as it appears to be less safe than waiting a 3-month interval.

Intra-articular corticosteroids associated with increased risk of total hip arthroplasty at 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are commonly administered for hip pain. However, guidelines are conflicting on their efficacy, particularly in patients without arthritis. This study assessed for an association of corticosteroid injections and the incidence of total hip arthroplasty at 5 years. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of hip pain without femoroacetabular osteoarthritis who were administered an intra-articular corticosteroid injection of the hip within a 2-year period were identified from the Mariner PearlDiver database. Patient were matched to patients with a diagnosis of hip pain who did not receive an injection. 5-year incidence of total hip arthroplasty was compared between matched patients who received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection and those who did not. RESULTS: 2,540,154 patients diagnosed with hip pain without femoroacetabular arthritis were identified. 25,073 (0.9%) patients received a corticosteroid injection and were matched to an equal number of control patients. The incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) at 5-year-follow up was significantly higher for the corticosteroid cohort compared to controls (1.1% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001). The incidence and risk of THA increased along with number of injections (1 injection: 0.8%, OR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.34-1.42; p < 0.001, 2 injections: 1.1%; OR 1.45; CI, 1.40-1.50; p < 0.001, ⩾3 injections: 1.5%; OR 1.48; CI, 1.40-1.56; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There may be a dose-dependent association of corticosteroid injections and a greater risk of total hip arthroplasty at 5 years. These results along with the conflicting guidelines on the efficacy of intra-articular steroids for hip pain should prompt physicians to consider osteoarthritis progression that may occur in the setting of corticosteroid injections in non-arthritic hips.

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are associated with a dose-dependent risk of total knee arthroplasty at 5 years.

PURPOSE: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSI) are used commonly for the non-operative management of patients with knee pain. Recent literature has raised concern for chondrotoxicity of CSI. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate for any dose-dependent association between CSI in non-osteoarthritic knees and subsequent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The Pearl Diver database identified patients with a diagnosis of knee pain without concomitant osteoarthritis who were administered CSI over a 2-year period. Patients were compared to matched and unmatched cohorts. The primary endpoint was the incidence of TKA at 5 years. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess CSI quantity as an independent risk factor. RESULTS: 49,443 of 986,162 (5.0%) Patients diagnosed with knee pain without concomitant knee osteoarthritis who received at least one CSI were identified. At 5 years, there was a higher incidence of TKA in the matched injection cohort relative to the non-injection matched cohort (0.26 vs 0.13%; p < 0.001) and unmatched cohort (0.26 vs. 0.10%, p < 0.001). The quantity of CSI corresponded with an increased probability of TKA at 5 years; one injection: 0.22% (OR 1.23, 95% CI [0.87-1.74], p = 0.236); two injections: 0.39% (OR 1.98 CI [1.06-3.67], p = 0.03, three or more injections: 0.49% (OR 3.22 CI [1.60-6.48], p = 0.001). The average time to TKA after one CSI was 3.03 ± 2.29 years. This time was nearly halved with three CSI (1.78 ± 0.80 years, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections in patients without knee osteoarthritis at the time of injection are associated with a dose-dependent risk of TKA at 5 years. CSI may not be as benign of a treatment modality as previously thought.

Do Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty Increase Postoperative Complication Rates: A Retrospective Review.

There is conflicting literature suggesting that intra-articular corticosteroid injections before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may lead to an increase in the rate of postoperative complications, specifically periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Thus, this retrospective review of all TKAs performed at a large, urban hospital will add valuable evidence to help guide future patient care. After exclusion criteria, we retrospectively reviewed 417 patients who received a TKA from a group of fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons between 2009 and 2016 at a single academic medical center. Minimum follow-up time was 1 year. Patients were separated into two groups: those who received a preoperative intra-articular corticosteroid injection and those who did not receive an injection. Subgroups were created based on the timing of their most recent preoperative injection: 0 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12+ months, and an unknown time period. Postoperative outcomes for PJI, revision TKA, and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) were analyzed via a Chi-square test. No statistically significant postoperative differences were observed between groups: PJI (p = 0.904), revision TKA (p = 0.206), and MUA (p = 0.163). The temporal subgroups also failed to demonstrate a statistically significant result: PJI (p = 0.348), revision TKA (p = 0.701), and MUA (p = 0.512). This study revealed no absolute or temporal association between preoperative, intra-articular corticosteroid injections, and complications after TKA. Because these injections are a commonly used treatment modality prior to TKA, further studies should be conducted on a nationwide basis to draw more concrete conclusions.