Volvulus of the gastrointestinal tract.

Volvulus describes the twisting of the intestine or colon around its mesentery. Intestinal obstruction and/or ischaemia are the most common complications of volvulus. Within the gastrointestinal tract, there is a preponderance towards colonic volvulus. The sigmoid is the most commonly affected segment, followed by the caecum, small intestine and stomach. Distinguishing between the differing anatomical locations of gastrointestinal volvulus can be challenging, but is important for the management and prognosis. This article focuses on the main anatomical sites of gastrointestinal volvulus encountered in clinical practice. The aetiology, presentation, radiological features and management options for each are discussed to highlight the key differences.

Impact of Focused Abdominal Ultrasound Utilization on Outcomes for Children With Midgut Volvulus.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is gaining acceptance for the evaluation of midgut volvulus in children. However, its impact on clinical outcomes is unknown. We aim to determine whether using US as a first-line modality changes imaging mobilization, time to surgery and re-feeding, length of stay, and frequency of bowel necrosis, short bowel syndrome, and death. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary pediatric institution. Eighty children with surgically confirmed midgut volvulus from 2014 to 2021 were compared before and after implementation of US as first-line imaging and based on the modality used to diagnose midgut volvulus. RESULTS: Outcomes were not statistically different pre- versus post-implementation. Compared with patients who had UGI only, those who had US only or both had significantly quicker imaging mobilization (median: -33 min; 95% CI: -61.2, -4.8; p = 0.023 and median: -31 min; 95% CI: -58.5, -3.6; p = 0.028 respectively). Patients with US only were less likely to have bowel necrosis compared with those who had UGI only (9.1% versus 43.8%, p = 0.042). Patients who had US only or both were less likely to develop short bowel syndrome compared to UGI only (4.8% US only, 0% both, 40% UGI only; p = 0.027 for US only, p = 0.005 for both). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant change in outcomes was found after implementation of US as first-line imaging for midgut volvulus. However, patients diagnosed with US only or US in combination with UGI had quicker imaging mobilization and decreased frequency of bowel necrosis and short bowel syndrome. Findings suggest that US has potential to improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Compound volvulus: ileosigmoid knot.

Compound volvulus, also known as ileosigmoid knot, is a rare cause of intestinal obstruction due to twisting of the small bowel around the large bowel or vice-versa. It poses a diagnostic dilemma due to the presence of features of closed-loop obstruction of both the small and large bowel. Being a surgical emergency due to the rapid progression to gangrene of involved segments leading to septicaemia, early suspicion of the disease entity, adequate resuscitation and prompt treatment are the need of the hour. Three cases encountered and managed in our setting are described here with a review of the literature.

The performance of ultrasound and upper gastrointestinal study in diagnosing malrotation in children, with or without volvulus.

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnosis is crucial for pediatric patients with midgut volvulus and malrotation to prevent serious complications. While the upper gastrointestinal study (UGIS) is the traditional method, the use of ultrasound (US) is gaining prominence. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of US compared to UGIS for malrotation and midgut volvulus. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 68 pediatric patients who underwent US and/or UGIS before surgery for suspected midgut volvulus or malrotation in Kuala Lumpur (PPUKM and HTA), referencing surgical outcomes as the gold standard. RESULTS: US demonstrated a higher specificity (100%) than UGIS (83%) for diagnosing malrotation, with a slightly lower sensitivity (97% vs. 100%). For midgut volvulus, US surpassed UGIS in sensitivity (92.9% vs. 66.7%) while maintaining comparable specificity. The SMA/SMV criteria showed better sensitivity (91.1%) than the D3 assessment (78.9%) on US, though both had high specificity. CONCLUSION: US is equivalent to UGIS for identifying malrotation and is more sensitive for detecting midgut volvulus, supporting its use as a primary diagnostic tool. The study advocates for combined US and UGIS when either yields inconclusive results, optimizing diagnostic precision for these conditions.

Neonatal Intestinal Segmental Volvulus: What Are the Differences with Midgut Volvulus?

OBJECTIVE: Intestinal volvulus in the neonate is a surgical emergency caused by either midgut volvulus (MV) with intestinal malrotation or less commonly, by segmental volvulus (SV) without intestinal malrotation. The aim of our study was to investigate if MV and SV can be differentiated by clinical course, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Using a defined search strategy, two investigators independently identified all studies comparing MV and SV in neonates. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Of 1,026 abstracts screened, 104 full-text articles were analyzed, and 3 comparative studies were selected (112 patients). There were no differences in gestational age (37 vs. 36 weeks), birth weight (2,989 vs. 2,712 g), and age at presentation (6.9 vs. 3.8 days). SV was more commonly associated with abnormal findings on fetal ultrasound (US; 65 vs. 11.6%; p < 0.00001). Preoperatively, SV was more commonly associated with abdominal distension (32 vs. 77%; p < 0.05), whereas MV with a whirlpool sign on ultrasound (57 vs. 3%; p < 0.01). Bilious vomiting had similar incidence in both (88 ± 4% vs. 50 ± 5%). Intraoperatively, SV had a higher incidence of intestinal atresia (2 vs. 19%; p < 0.05) and need for bowel resection (13 vs. 91%; p < 0.00001). There were no differences in postoperative complications (13% MV vs. 14% SV), short bowel syndrome (15% MV vs. 0% SV; data available only from one study), and mortality (12% MV vs. 2% SV). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the paucity of studies on SV in neonates. Nonetheless, our meta-analysis clearly indicates that SV is an entity on its own with distinct clinical features and intraoperative findings that are different from MV. SV should be considered as one of the differential diagnoses in all term and preterm babies with bilious vomiting after MV was ruled out-especially if abnormal fetal US and abdominal distension is present.

Diagnostic accuracy of upper gastrointestinal series in children with suspected intestinal malrotation.

Intestinal malrotation (IM) results from an altered or incomplete rotation of the fetal midgut around the superior mesenteric artery axis. The abnormal anatomy of IM is associated with risk of acute midgut volvulus which can lead to catastrophic clinical consequences. The upper gastro-intestinal series (UGI) is addressed as the gold standard diagnosis procedure, but a variable failure degree has been described in literature. The aim of the study was to analyze the UGI exam and describe which features are the most reproducible and reliable in diagnosing IM. Medical records of patients surgically treated for suspected IM between 2007 and 2020 at a single pediatric tertiary care center were retrospectively reviewed. UGI inter-observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy were statistically calculated. Images obtained with antero-posterior (AP) projections were the most significant in terms of IM diagnosis. Duodenal-Jejunal Junction (DJJ) abnormal position resulted to be the most reliable parameter (Se = 0.88; Sp = 0.54) as well as the most readable, with an inter-reader agreement of 83% (k = 0.70, CI 0.49-0.90). The First Jejunal Loops (FJL), caecum altered position and duodenal dilatation could be considered additional data. Lateral projections demonstrated an overall low sensitivity (Se = 0.80) and specificity (Sp = 0.33) with a PPV of 0.85 and a NPV of 0.25. UGI on the sole AP projections ensures a good diagnostic accuracy. The position of the third portion of the duodenum on lateral views showed an overall low reliability, therefore it was not helpful but rather deceiving in diagnosing IM.

Ultrasound as the first line investigation for midgut malrotation: a UK tertiary centre experience.

AIM: To present the first 22-months experience of transitioning to an ultrasound-first pathway for suspected midgut malrotation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An "ultrasound-first" imaging pathway was initiated in October 2021. Twenty-two-months later, a search was undertaken of all <1-year-old patients with "bilious", "malrotation," or "volvulus" as the imaging indication. Reports and images from upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy (UGI) and ultrasound were reviewed, and diagnoses and outcomes were documented. RESULTS: The search yielded 101 eligible cases between October 2021 and July 2023. Of the patients, 63/101 (62%) had both ultrasound and UGI: 47/63 (75%) ultrasound first, 16/63 (25%) UGI first. Thirty-one per cent (31/101) had ultrasound only and 7/70 (10%) UGI only. The pathway diagnosed 7/8 (88%) infants with midgut malrotation with or without volvulus and one infant who had an inconclusive ultrasound examination with a suspected an internal hernia and who was found to have malrotation volvulus at surgery. Twenty-one infants who had confidently normal ultrasound examinations and who also had UGI all had a normal duodenojejunal flexure position. Ultrasound detected alternative pathology in eight children. Duodenal visualisation improved with time: 6/15 (40%) in the first 6 months to 23/34 (68%) after the first year. CONCLUSION: The transition to ultrasound as the first diagnostic test for midgut malrotation can be done safely and effectively in a UK centre, which previously relied solely on UGI.

Evaluation of 18 CT signs in diagnosing cecal volvulus: a multi-reader retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance and reliability of 18 CT signs to diagnose cecal volvulus, a surgical emergency, versus a group of non-volvulus mimickers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four radiologists retrospectively and independently assessed 18 CT signs in 191 patients with cecal volvulus (n = 63) or a non-volvulus control group ((n = 128), including cecal bascule (n = 19), mobile cecum (n = 95), and colonic pseudo-obstruction (n = 14)) at a single institution from 2013 to 2021. Fleiss' kappa coefficient was used to assess inter-reader agreement. For diagnostic performance metrics, we assessed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. For predictive performance, all 18 signs were included in bivariate and stepwise lasso multivariate logistic regression models to diagnose cecal volvulus. Performance was assessed by ROC curves. RESULTS: 191 patients (mean age: 63 years +/- 15.5 [SD]; 135 women) were included in the study. Nine of the 18 CT signs of cecal volvulus demonstrated good or better (> 0.6) inter-reader agreement. Individual CT signs with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values all above 70% for diagnosing cecal volvulus were transition point, bird beak, and X-marks-the-spot. A lasso regression model determined four CT features: transition point, bird beak, coffee bean, and whirl had excellent prediction (AUC = .979) for cecal volvulus if all present. CONCLUSION: CT signs for cecal volvulus that have high sensitivity and specificity include: transition point, bird beak, and X-marks-the-spot and were reliable in distinguishing non-volvulus mimickers. If the following four features were present: transition point, bird beak, coffee bean, and whirl, there was excellent prediction (AUC = .979) for cecal volvulus.

Coffee bean sign, steel pan sign and whirl sign in sigmoid volvulus

A 66-year-old man presented with abdominal distension. A plain radiograph showed the coffee bean sign, suggesting sigmoid volvulus (SV). The CT scans disclosed the steel pan sign, the whirl sign, and the beak-shaped transition point, confirming SV. He improved with colonoscopic decompression and detorsion. Characteristic radiographic signs of SV are briefly discussed (AU)