ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bone metastases can compromise the integrity of the spinal canal and cause epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC). The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) was developed in order to evaluate spinal instability due to a neoplastic process. The SINS has reached wide acceptance among clinicans but its prognostic value is still controversial. The aim was to investigate the correlation between the SINS and ESCC and the association between SINS and ambulation before and survival after surgery. METHODS: Correlations were assessed between SINS and grades of ESCC in patients who underwent spine surgery for spinal metastases. CT and MRI were used to calculate SINS and the grades of ESCC respectively. Correlations were analyzed with the Spearman's correlation test. Postoperative survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and survival curves were compared with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the effect of prognostic variables including age, ambulation before surgery, SINS, and the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) as covariates. RESULTS: The study included 256 patients (196 men and 60 women) with a median age of 70 (24-88) years. The mean SINS was 10. One hundred fifty-two patients (59%) had lost ambulation before surgery. One hundred and one patients had grades 0-2 and 155 patients had grade 3 according to the ESCC-scale. SINS correlated with the grades of ESCC (p = 0.001). The SINS score was not associated with ambulation before surgery (p = 0.63). The median postoperative survival was 10 months, and there was no difference in postoperative survival between the SINS categories (p = 0.25). The ability to walk before surgery and a high KPS were associated with longer postoperative survival. CONCLUSION: SINS correlated with grades of ESCC, which implies that higher SINS may be considered as an indicator of risk for developing ESCC. The SINS was not associated with ambulation before or survival after surgery.
Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Compression , Spinal Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Spinal Cord Compression/surgery , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Female , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Spinal Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Prognosis , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiologyABSTRACT
Background: To investigate the search for an Iliac-Talar Grafts on the iliac bone that is morphologically matched to a multiplanar injury lesion of the talus; while utilizing a bone-harvesting guide to ensure precise positioning of the Iliac-Talar Grafts. Methods: A total of twenty-two cases with both talar CT data and iliac CT data were collected from January 2019 to June 2023. One case each of talar deformity injury and bone disease were excluded, resulting in a selection of 20 cases. The medial and lateral target repair areas of the talus were formulated, and virtual surgery was performed by using digital orthopedic technology to locate an iliac-talar restoration on the iliac bone that matched the morphology of the multiplanar injury lesion of the talus. 3D chromatographic deviation analysis was used to assess the accuracy of Iliac-Talar Grafts in terms of morphometric matching and positioning, while personalized iliac bone extraction guides were designed to ensure accurate positioning of the Iliac-Talar Grafts. Results: The best fitting point for repairing the medial talar lesion is determined to be medial to the anterior iliac crest, specifically 2.935 ± 0.365 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine, and 2.550 ± 0.559 cm anterior to the valgus-iliac crest point (VICP). Similarly, for the repair of the lateral talar lesion, the ideal position is found to be lateral to the posterior iliac crest, approximately 2.695 ± 0.640 cm posterior to the valgus-iliac crest point (VICP). Utilizing bone extraction guides enables precise positioning for iliac bone extraction. Conclusion: This study utilizes virtual surgery, 3D chromatographic deviation analysis, and guide plate techniques in digital orthopedics to precisely locate the Iliac-Talar Graft on the iliac bone, matching the morphology of the talar lesion; it provides a new solution for cutting the iliac bone implant that matches the the multifaceted talar lesion to be repaired.
Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation , Ilium , Talus , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Ilium/transplantation , Talus/surgery , Talus/injuries , Talus/diagnostic imaging , Male , Bone Transplantation/methods , Female , Adult , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Ankle Injuries/surgeryABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate whether different degrees of primary varus knee affect joint function and stability in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: A clinical data of 160 patients with primary varus knee, who were admitted between January 2020 and December 2021 and met the selection criteria, was retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent primary ACL reconstruction using autologous single-bundle hamstring tendon. Patients were divided into three groups based on the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA): group A (64 patients with HKA 0°-3°), group B (55 patients with HKA 3°-6°), and group C (41 patients with HKA 6°-9°). Except for the significant difference in HKA among the three groups ( P<0.05), baseline data such as age, gender, affected side, body mass index, interval between injury and operation, Kellgren-Lawrence grading, posterior tibial slope, proportion of combined meniscal injuries, Tegner score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective score, anterior drawer test, Lachman test, pivot shift test, and the results of KT1000 (side-to-side difference, SSD) showed no significant difference ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, joint stability was assessed through the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, pivot shift test, and SSD; joint function was evaluated using the Tegner score, Lysholm score, and IKDC objective score. Results: All incisions in the three groups healed by first intention after operation. All patients were followed up 24-31 months, with an average of 26 months; there was no significant difference in the follow-up time among the three groups ( Z=0.675, P=0.714). At last follow-up, the knee stability and functional assessment indicators in each group significantly improved when compared to preoperative ones ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference among the three groups ( P>0.05) in terms of the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, pivot shift test, IKDC objective scores, and the changes of the Lysholm scores and Tegner scores. The Kellgren-Lawrence grading and HKA at last follow-up were consistent with preoperative results in the three groups. Conclusion: Varying degrees of primary varus knee do not affect early knee joint stability and functional recovery after ACL reconstruction, and there is no significant difference in effectiveness between different degrees of varus knee.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Knee Joint , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Knee Joint/surgery , Adult , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Range of Motion, Articular , Transplantation, Autologous , Hamstring Tendons/transplantationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medial tibial defects are common in patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty for varus deformity. Previous clinical studies have categorized tibial defects according to the depth of the defects and recommended different ways of addressing them. This study aimed to perform a biomechanical FE analysis to investigate the role of depth and surface area of the medial tibial plateau defects in the stability of the tibial component in primary TKA implants. METHOD: Forty posteromedial tibial defect models with eight different depths (including 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 16, and 18 mm) and five different surface areas (including 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% medial surface involvement) were used to create the FE models. Loads were applied to ellipses on tibial tray with 70-30% mediolateral distribution. The resulting relative motion of the bone and implant was measured to evaluate the tibial tray instability. RESULTS: For defects with less than 20% surface involvement, the amount of relative motion had a moderately increasing fashion; however, in more significant percentages of surface involvement of the medial tibial plateau, especially in 50%, the graphs revealed a nonlinear increasing pattern which means that the depth would affect the amount of relative motion only when defect area is large. CONCLUSION: In defects with less than 20% surface involvement approaches like graft and cement augmentation would suffice whereas it would be essential to consider a more appropriate method like stem or metal augments for defects with more than 20% of medial surface involvement as the instability increased nonlinearly.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Knee Prosthesis , Tibia , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Tibia/surgery , Tibia/physiopathology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint/surgery , Finite Element Analysis , Male , Range of Motion, Articular/physiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Proximal femur tumor resection often leads to hip joint instability and functional loss. Various methods have been clinically applied to repair hip joint soft tissue function, but deficiencies remain. This study aims to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) tumor tube in assisting soft tissue function reconstruction in patients undergoing tumor type artificial hip replacement surgery. METHODS: This study included 85 patients (41 males, 44 females) with proximal femoral tumors treated at the Xiangya Bone Tumor Treatment Center from January 2012 to January 2022, aged 10 to 79 (38.5±18.2) years. Among them, 13 cases had benign aggressive tumors, 45 had primary malignant bone tumors, and 27 had bone metastases. Clinical data, imaging data, and intraoperative photos were collected. Patients were followed up and postoperative functional evaluations were conducted using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system and Harris hip joint scoring system to assess limb function and hip joint function. RESULTS: Preoperative pathological fractures were present in 37 cases (43.5%), with a lesion length of (9.4±2.9) cm. Among non-metastatic tumor patients, 7 experienced postoperative recurrence, including 6 cases of osteosarcoma and 1 case of fibrosarcoma. Pulmonary metastases occurred in 9 osteosarcoma patients. Five patients required reoperation due to postoperative complications, including 3 cases of deep vein thrombosis, 1 case of giant cell granuloma, and 1 case of prosthesis infection. Postoperatively, 5 patients exhibited Trendelenburg gait, and 6 had leg length discrepancies. The postoperative MSTS score was 26.7±1.4, and the Harris score was 89.6±5.3. CONCLUSIONS: The LARS tumor tube can effectively assist in reconstructing the soft tissue function of the hip joint and greatly reduce postoperative complications, making it an effective technical improvement in joint function reconstruction in tumor type artificial hip replacement surgery.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Femoral Neoplasms , Hip Joint , Humans , Male , Female , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Child , Hip Joint/surgery , Aged , Femoral Neoplasms/surgery , Young Adult , Osteosarcoma/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Femur/surgery , Hip ProsthesisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To assess the clinical outcomes and identify the ideal indication for implementing dorsal distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) capsular imbrication after triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repair in cases of DRUJ instability. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on patients who underwent arthroscopic TFCC repair between 2016 and 2021. Inclusion criteria comprised a symptomatic ulna fovea sign for over 6 months and dorsal DRUJ subluxation on magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 225 patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (135 cases) with a negative ballottement test after "Cross-form TFCC repair" (CR) and Group 2 (90 cases) with a positive ballottement test after "Cross-form TFCC repair" and augmented DRUJ stability through dorsal DRUJ capsular imbrication (CR + DCI). Pain visual analog scale score (VAS), grip strength, modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), wrist range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were assessed for a minimum of 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvements in pain VAS score, grip strength, wrist ROM, MMWS, and PROMs between the preoperative and postoperative periods (all P < 0.05). Recurrent DRUJ instability occurred in 3.7% and 1.1% of patients in the "CR" and "CR + DCI" groups, respectively, with a significant difference. Despite the "CR + DCI" group initially exhibiting inferior ROM compared with the "CR" group, subsequently, no significant difference was noted between them. CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal DRUJ capsular imbrication effectively reduces postoperative DRUJ instability rates, enhances grip strength, and maintains wrist ROM in patients with a positive intra-operative ballottement test after arthroscopic TFCC repair.
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Joint Instability , Range of Motion, Articular , Triangular Fibrocartilage , Wrist Joint , Humans , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Joint Instability/etiology , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Arthroscopy/methods , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Adult , Wrist Joint/surgery , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging , Wrist Joint/physiopathology , Triangular Fibrocartilage/surgery , Triangular Fibrocartilage/injuries , Triangular Fibrocartilage/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Hand Strength , Joint Capsule/surgery , Joint Capsule/diagnostic imaging , Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the mid-term effectiveness of limited unique coracoid osteotomy suture button fixation Latarjet (LU-tarjet) procedure in treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Methods: Between March 2017 and February 2019, 56 patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation were treated with arthroscopic LU-tarjet procedure. There were 44 males and 12 females with an average age of 26.3 years (range, 18-41 years). Shoulder joint dislocation occurred 2-16 times, with an average of 7.5 times. The time from the initial dislocation to operation ranged from 6 months to 13 years, with a median of 4.6 years. Preoperative shoulder joint fear test and re-reduction test were positive in all patients. The Beighton score of joint relaxation ranged from 1 to 7, with an average of 4.1. The shoulder Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) ranged from 5 to 10, with an average of 7.8. The size of glenoid defects on the affected side ranged from 15% to 32% (mean, 22.4%). All patients had Hill-Sachs injuries of varying degrees. Six patients had re-dislocation after Bankart surgery. The operation time, incision healing, and postoperative complications were recorded. The range of motion (shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation, 90° external rotation, and internal rotation) and muscle strength in shoulder flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation) of shoulder joint were compared between pre- and post-operation. The improvement of shoulder function was evaluated using the American Association for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score, Walch-Duplay score, and Rowe score. X-ray films and three-dimensional CT were used to analyze the location, healing, and remolding of bone graft, the repair of glenoid defect, and degenerative changes of the shoulder joint. Results: All operations were successfully completed. The operation time ranged from 42 to 98 minutes, with an average of 63 minutes. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 5-7 years (mean, 6.3 years). During follow-up, 2 patients experienced shoulder subluxation within 1 year after operation and 1 patient experienced recurrent shoulder joint pain. The remaining patients had no related complications. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in range of motion (shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation, 90° external rotation, and internal rotation) and muscle strength in shoulder flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation). The ASES score, Rowe score, and Walch-Duplay score of shoulder significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05). Postoperative CT showed that 53 cases (94.64%) of coracoid bone masses were centered placed vertically, 2 cases (3.57%) were superior, and 1 case (1.79%) was inferior; 49 cases (87.50%) of the coracoid bone grafts were flush with the glenoid, 2 cases (3.57%) and 5 cases (8.93%) were medially and laterally positioned. The volume of coracoid bone graft decreased first and then increased, and the shape of the bone graft was continuously remodeling and gradually matched with the track of the humerus head (the optimal circle of the glenoid), all coracoid bone grafts healed. At last follow-up, the coverage rate of optimal glenoid circle was 89.6%-100%, with an average of 97.4%. The area of glenoid defect was 2.6%±1.3%, which significantly decreased when compared with preoperative (22.4%±5.4%) ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, no obvious degenerative changes of shoulder joint was observed. Conclusion: LU-tarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation has good mid-term effectiveness with short operation time and few complications.
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Osteotomy , Range of Motion, Articular , Recurrence , Shoulder Dislocation , Humans , Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Male , Female , Adult , Adolescent , Osteotomy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Arthroscopy/methods , Young Adult , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Shoulder Joint/surgeryABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of suture button fixation Latarjet procedure under total arthroscopy for anterior shoulder instability with severe bone defects. Methods: The clinical data of 15 patients with severe bone defects and anterior shoulder instability treated with suture button fixation Latarjet procedure under total arthroscopy between June 2020 and February 2023 was retrospectively analyzed, including 11 males and 4 females, with an average age of 31.1 years (range, 20-54 years). Three-dimensional CT showed that the average glenoid bone defect was 24.4% (range, 16.3%-35.2%). The average number of shoulder dislocation was 4.2 times (range, 3-8 times). The disease duration ranged from 6 to 21 months with an average of 10.6 months. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The pain relief was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the functional recovery of shoulder joint was evaluated by Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score, and American Association for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score before and after operation. The range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder joint was assessed, including active flexion, lateral external rotation, abduction 90° external rotation, and internal rotation. Three-dimensional CT was performed at 6 months after operation and at last follow-up to observe the absorption of bone graft, the position of bone graft and glenoid, and the healing of bone graft. Results: The operation was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time was 85-195 minutes, with an average of 123.0 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 20-75 mL, with an average of 26.5 mL. All patients were followed up 13-32 months, with an average of 18.7 months. During the follow-up, there was no serious complication such as shoulder joint infection, joint stiffness, or vascular and nerve injury. One patient had partial absorption of the transplanted bone and bone nonunion at 3 months after operation, but the pain of the shoulder joint relieved at last follow-up, and no redislocation of the shoulder joint occurred; no obvious bone fracture or dislocation of the shoulder joint was found in the other patients. Bone union was achieved at 6 months during follow-up. At last follow-up, the VAS score, Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score, and ASES score significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05), while the ROM of active flexion, lateral external rotation, abduction 90° external rotation, and internal rotation of the shoulder joint was not significantly different from those before operation ( P>0.05). Conclusion: Suture button fixation Latarjet procedure under total arthroscopy can improve shoulder joint function in patients with severe anterior shoulder instability caused by bone defects, and imaging also indicates satisfactory placement of transplanted bone blocks.
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Joint Instability , Shoulder Joint , Humans , Male , Female , Arthroscopy/methods , Adult , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Knee instability in midflexion may contribute to patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Midflexion instability involves abnormal motions and tissue loading in multiple planes. Therefore, we quantified and compared the tensions carried by the medial and lateral collateral ligaments (MCL and LCL) following posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA through knee flexion, and then compared these tensions with those carried by the native knee. Finally, we examined the relationships between collateral ligament tensions and anterior tibial translation (ATT). METHODS: Eight cadaveric knees (from 5 male and 3 female donors with a mean age of 62.6 years and standard deviation of 10.9 years) underwent PS TKA. Each specimen was mounted to a robotic manipulator and flexed to 90°. ATT was quantified by applying 30 N of anterior force to the tibia. Tensions carried by the collateral ligaments were determined via serial sectioning. Robotic testing was also conducted on a cohort of 15 healthy native cadaveric knees (from 9 male and 6 female donors with a mean age of 36 years and standard deviation of 11 years). Relationships between collateral ligament tensions during passive flexion and ATT were assessed via linear and nonlinear regressions. RESULTS: MCL tensions were greater following PS TKA than in the native knee at 15° and 30° of passive flexion, by a median of ≥27 N (p = 0.002), while the LCL tensions did not differ. Median tensions following PS TKA were greater in the MCL than in the LCL at 15°, 30°, and 90° of flexion, by ≥4 N (p ≤ 0.02). Median tensions in the MCL of the native knee were small (≤11 N) and did not exceed those in the LCL (p ≥ 0.25). A logarithmic relationship was identified between MCL tension and ATT following TKA. CONCLUSIONS: MCL tensions were greater following PS TKA with this typical nonconforming PS implant than in the native knee. Anterior laxity at 30° of flexion was highly sensitive to MCL tension during passive flexion following PS TKA but not in the native knee. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons face competing objectives when performing PS TKA: they can either impart supraphysiological MCL tension to reduce anterior-posterior laxity or maintain native MCL tensions that lead to heightened anterior-posterior laxity, as shown in this study.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Cadaver , Joint Instability , Knee Joint , Range of Motion, Articular , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Joint Instability/etiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Aged , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint/surgery , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee/surgery , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee/physiopathology , Adult , Collateral Ligaments/surgery , Collateral Ligaments/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although the direct anterior (DA) approach has increased in popularity for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is limited evidence regarding its use for revision THA. It is unknown whether the dislocation benefit seen in the primary setting translates to revision cases. METHODS: This retrospective review compared the dislocation rates of revision THA performed through DA versus postero-lateral (PL) approaches at a single institution (2011 to 2021). Exclusion criteria included revision for instability, ≥ 2 prior revisions, approaches other than DA or PL, and placement of dual-mobility or constrained liners. There were 182 hips in 173 patients that met the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 6.5 years (range, 2 to 8 years). RESULTS: There was a trend toward more both-component revisions being performed through the PL approach. There were no differences in dislocation rates between the DA revision and PL revision cohorts, which were 8.1% (5 of 72) and 7.5% (9 of 120), respectively (P = .999). Dislocation trended lower when the revision approach was discordant from the primary approach compared to cases where primary and revision had a concordant approach (4.9 versus 8.5%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .740). No significant differences were found in return to operating room, 90-day emergency department visits, or 90-day readmissions. However, the length of stay was significantly shorter in patients who had DA revisions after a primary PL procedure (P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Dislocation rates following revision THA did not differ between the DA and PL approaches irrespective of the primary approach. Surgeons should choose their revision approach based on their experience and the specific needs of the patient.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Reoperation , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Failure , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Joint Instability/etiology , Joint Instability/surgery , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Hip Dislocation/etiology , Hip Dislocation/surgery , Hip Dislocation/epidemiology , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder instability repair has been proposed, and early clinical results have been promising. However, long-term results after this procedure and the probable risk factors for failure have not been sufficiently discussed in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who were diagnosed with recurrent anteroinferior shoulder instability after failed Bankart repair, treated with ACRR between September 1998 and November 2003 and able to be contacted were included. Of these patients, 2 were excluded from the study due to the use of SureTak anchors for fixation, and 5 other patients refused to participate in the study due to lack of interest (3 patients) or lack of time (2 patients). The remaining shoulders were clinically examined at a minimum of ten years after surgery via the ASES, Constant, AAOS, Rowe, Dawson and VAS scores for pain and stability. Degenerative arthropathy was assessed with the modified Samilson-Prieto score. RESULTS: All 31 remaining shoulders were evaluated at a mean time of 11.86 years (142.4 months) after surgery. Six patients (19.35%) reported redisolcation after the revision procedure, 4 of whom were affected by a new significant shoulder trauma. The ROWE and Constant scores improved significantly. Moderate to severe dislocation arthropathy was observed in 19.4% of patients. Five patients (16.2%) were not satisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up after ACRR shows predictable results, with a high degree of patient satisfaction, good to excellent patient-reported outcome scores and minimal radiological degenerative changes. However, with an average recurrence rate of 19.3% after 11.86 years, the redislocation rate appears high. With careful patient selection, recurrence rates can be significantly reduced.
Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Joint Instability , Reoperation , Shoulder Joint , Suture Anchors , Humans , Arthroscopy/methods , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/methods , Adult , Male , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Shoulder Joint/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Young Adult , Treatment Failure , AdolescentABSTRACT
Syndesmotic ankle injuries, though rare in isolation, are complex destabilizing injuries often accompanied by fractures. Misdiagnoses, particularly overlooking posterior malleolus fractures, are common in ankle sprains. Thorough physical examinations, emphasizing high fibular pain and anterior tibia palpation, aid in accurate diagnosis. Grading helps assess injury severity and guiding treatment. Initial imaging involves three ankle views, with stress radiographs enhancing accuracy. If conservative care fails, MRI reveals ligament and tendon damage. Physical therapy may suffice for functional instability; surgical intervention addresses mechanical instability. Syndesmotic fixation debates center on cortices, screw size, reduction methods, and optimal positioning.
Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Humans , Ankle Injuries/surgery , Ankle Injuries/diagnosis , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Ankle Fractures/surgery , Ankle Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Female , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Joint Instability/diagnosisABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This manuscript aims to identify an indication algorithm for the surgical treatment of radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocation. The study compares the mid-term functional outcomes of patients with multifragment radial head fracture treated by resection with the outcomes of patients treated with radial head replacement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cohort of 34 patients who sustained a radial head fracture at the mean age of 42.5 years (age range 20-81 years) was broken down into two groups by type of surgery. The EXT group consists of 20 patients with the radial head fracture treated by radial head resection. The END group includes 14 patients treated with the radial head replacement. In all patients, the radial head fracture was associated with elbow dislocation (type IV fracture according to the Mason-Johnston classification). The modified Kocher's surgical approach was used in all patients of both the groups. In the EXT group, resection of the fragmented radial head was performed. In the END group, the ExploR® Modular Radial Head System (Zimmer, Biomet, USA) was used, consisting of a CoCr (cobalt chromium) alloy head and a titanium stem. The pain and the range of motion of the elbow and forearm were evaluated after the completion of the outpatient rehabilitation (the mean follow-up period was 2.4 years). Simultaneously, the elbow joint stability was assessed. Radiographs were taken to detect heterotopic ossifications, proximalization of the radius, and any signs of prosthesis loosening. The frequency of reoperations was followed-up. The MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) was calculated. RESULTS: In the EXT group, the mean elbow flexion was 117.5° and the mean pronation/supination was 166.9°. In 50% of patients, the MEPS obtained was greater than 90 points, which means an excellent functional outcome. In 1 patient (5%), recurrent elbow dislocation occurred which was the reason for revision surgery (elbow transfixation with the Kirschner wires and medial collateral ligament suture). Revision surgery was also performed in 2 patients (10%) in whom not all the radial head fragments were removed. Moreover, also observed was elbow joint instability (2 patients) and temporary radial nerve paralysis (1 patient). In 1 case discrete proximalization of the radius developed. The patients in the END group showed the mean elbow flexion of 112° and the mean pronation/supination of 135°. The MEPS obtained from 69% of patients was greater than 90 points, which means an excellent outcome. The pain under load was reported by 3 patients (21%). In 5 patients (35%), the X-rays showed radiolucent zone around the stem of the prosthesis. Neither revision surgery, nor prosthesis removal has been performed yet in any patient. No instability, neurological complications or infections have been reported. In both EXT and END group heterotopic ossifications have developed in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Radial head replacement compared to the radial head resection in the management of multifragment fractures associated with elbow dislocations increase the elbow and forearm stability. The group of patients with an implanted radial head prosthesis shows a higher percentage of patients achieving excellent functional outcome than the group of patients with radial head resection. KEY WORDS: radial head, elbow, fracture, dislocation, resection, prosthesis.
Subject(s)
Elbow Joint , Fractures, Comminuted , Joint Dislocations , Joint Instability , Radius Fractures , Humans , Radius Fractures/surgery , Adult , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Elbow Joint/surgery , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Male , Fractures, Comminuted/surgery , Aged , Female , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Elbow Injuries , Aged, 80 and over , Range of Motion, Articular , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Radial Head and Neck FracturesABSTRACT
CASE: A 34-year-old man was acutely treated with radial head arthroplasty and central band repair following Essex-Lopresti injury. A 38-year-old man presented with chronic longitudinal instability following failed radial head arthroplasty, which was performed for failed fixation. Treatment with revision radial head arthroplasty and central band reconstruction restored longitudinal stability. CONCLUSION: We have a low threshold to repair the central band in acute Essex-Lopresti injury with sufficient evidence of disruption. Nearly all chronic cases require central band reconstruction to restore longitudinal stability. We do not temporarily pin the DRUJ, and distal ulnar shortening is rarely indicated.
Subject(s)
Joint Instability , Humans , Male , Adult , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Elbow Injuries , Radius Fractures/surgery , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Wrist Injuries/surgery , Arthroplasty/methodsABSTRACT
Elbow stability arises from a combination of bony congruity, static ligamentous and capsular restraints, and dynamic muscular activation. Elbow trauma can disrupt these static and dynamic stabilizers leading to predictable patterns of instability; these patterns are dependent on the mechanism of injury and a progressive failure of anatomic structures. An algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocation injuries can improve the diagnostic assessment and reconstruction of the bony and ligamentous restraints to restore a stable and functional elbow. Achieving optimal outcomes requires a comprehensive understanding of pertinent local and regional anatomy, the altered mechanics associated with elbow injury, versatility in surgical approaches and fixation methods, and a strategic rehabilitation plan.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Elbow Injuries , Elbow Joint , Humans , Elbow Joint/surgery , Elbow Joint/diagnostic imaging , Fracture Dislocation/surgery , Fracture Dislocation/diagnostic imaging , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Elbow FracturesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the injury mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of varus-posteromedial rotational instability of the elbow joint in children. METHODS: According to the diagnostic criteria of varus posteromedial rotational instability of elbow joint, 16 children with coronoid process fractures treated in our department from July 2013 to July 2017 were re-evaluated. There were 14 males and 2 females, aged 7 to 14 years, with an average age of 11.6 years. Eight cases on left and 8 cases on right side. An associated elbow dislocation occurred in 8 of 16 cases. Nine patients were treated with a lateral soft tissue repair only. In 7 other patients in addition to the lateral soft tissue repair, the coronoid process fractures were treated with open reduction and fixation. At the last clinical follow-up, each elbow joint range of motion was recorded, radiographs were obtained, and functional performance was evaluated by the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 81.9 months for the 9 patients treated with lateral elbow soft tissue repair. At the last follow-up, 2 of the patients had MEPS scores as excellent, 1 was good, and 6 were rated as moderate or poor. Four patients had a cubitus varus deformity. The average follow-up time was 30.3 months for the 7 patients treated with both soft tissue repair and coronoid fracture stabilization. The elbow joint MEPS scores for each of these 7 patients was excellent at the last follow-up, and no complications such as cubitus varus occurred. CONCLUSION: The results of the study suggest that children could also develop elbow varus-posterior medial rotational instability injuries under the same mechanism. Although the morbidity rate is low, due to insufficient understanding of the injury mechanism, it is prone to missed diagnosis, misdiagnosis, and delayed treatment, resulting in severe complications such as elbow instability, dislocation, traumatic arthritis, and elbow stiffness. On the contrary, according to the treatment principle of the posterior medial rotational instability of the elbow joint in adult, while the lateral repair is carried out, strong and effective reduction and fixation of the coronoid process fractures are adopted, it is expected that such children with rare elbow injuries can obtain excellent treatment outcomes.
Subject(s)
Elbow Injuries , Elbow Joint , Joint Instability , Range of Motion, Articular , Ulna Fractures , Humans , Child , Female , Adolescent , Male , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Elbow Joint/surgery , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Ulna Fractures/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Rotation , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: patellar instability is a relatively frequent musculoskeletal disorder in children with Down syndrome (DS). However, such a condition has seldom been studied in the literature, even less its surgical treatment. Different techniques have been offered for this condition; the evidence for surgical options is scarce and primarily based on case reports or case series with few patients and heterogeneous techniques. Given this background, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a uniform kind of surgical procedure for such a condition that combined lateral soft tissue release, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction (using a partial-thickness quadriceps tendon autograft), the Roux-Goldthwait procedure, and V-Y quadricepsplasty (if needed). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved 11 skeletally immature patients (12 knees; 9 males and 2 females), 5.5 to 14.1 years of age, with DS who had patellofemoral instability (PFI) and were managed by this technique between October 2018 and March 2020. Preoperative radiography, CT scan, and MRI were performed to evaluate the physis status, lower limb alignment, patellar height, trochlear morphology, and any associated knee pathology. A functional knee assessment was done by using the Kujala score and the modified Lysholm score. RESULTS: The mean time of follow-up (± SD) was 47.7 ± 5.8 months (range: 39-56). Pre-operatively, the Kujala score (± SD) was 52.6 ± 14.3 (range: (31-74), and at final follow-up, it was 92.2 ± 4.4 (range: (88-98), showing a significant improvement (P < 0.001). The preoperative modified Lysholm score (± SD) was 54.3 ± 8.1 (range: 39-62), and at final follow-up it was 92.4 ± 5.3 (range: 82-96), showing a significant improvement (P < 0.001). All patients had a stable patella without a recurrence of instability and regained full ROM. There was no incidence of a patellar fracture or femoral physis injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed technique of combined soft tissue procedures, including lateral soft tissue release, MPFL reconstruction (using a partial-thickness quadriceps tendon autograft), the Roux-Goldthwait procedure, and V-Y quadricepsplasty, was an effective method for treating patellar instability in children with DS while avoiding physeal injury and patellar fracture. Functional scores and radiological outcomes were improved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective case series.
Subject(s)
Down Syndrome , Joint Instability , Humans , Down Syndrome/complications , Down Syndrome/surgery , Male , Female , Child , Retrospective Studies , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Joint Instability/etiology , Adolescent , Treatment Outcome , Child, Preschool , Patellofemoral Joint/surgery , Patellofemoral Joint/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Patellar Dislocation/surgery , Patellar Dislocation/diagnostic imaging , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Orthopedic Procedures/methodsABSTRACT
Aims: There is little information in the literature about the use of dual-mobility (DM) bearings in preventing re-dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to compare the use of DM bearings, standard bearings, and constrained liners in revision THA for recurrent dislocation, and to identify risk factors for re-dislocation. Methods: We reviewed 86 consecutive revision THAs performed for dislocation between August 2012 and July 2019. A total of 38 revisions (44.2%) involved a DM bearing, while 39 (45.3%) and nine (10.5%) involved a standard bearing and a constrained liner, respectively. Rates of re-dislocation, re-revision for dislocation, and overall re-revision were compared. Radiographs were assessed for the positioning of the acetabular component, the restoration of the centre of rotation, leg length, and offset. Risk factors for re-dislocation were determined by Cox regression analysis. The modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHSs) were recorded. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision was 70 years (43 to 88); 54 were female (62.8%). The mean follow-up was 5.0 years (2.0 to 8.75). Results: DM bearings were used significantly more frequently in elderly patients (p = 0.003) and in hips with abductor deficiency (p < 0.001). The re-dislocation rate was 13.2% for DM bearings compared with 17.9% for standard bearings, and 22.2% for constrained liners (p = 0.432). Re-revision-free survival for DM bearings was 84% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 0.91) compared with 74% (95% CI 0.67 to 0.81) for standard articulations, and 67% (95% CI 0.51 to 0.82) for constrained liners (p = 0.361). Younger age (hazard ratio (HR) 0.92 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.99); p = 0.031), lower comorbidity (HR 0.44 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.95); p = 0.037), smaller heads (HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.99); p = 0.046), and retention of the acetabular component (HR 8.26 (95% CI 1.37 to 49.96); p = 0.022) were significantly associated with re-dislocation. All DM bearings which re-dislocated were in patients with abductor muscle deficiency (HR 48.34 (95% CI 0.03 to 7,737.98); p = 0.303). The radiological analysis did not reveal a significant relationship between restoration of the geometry of the hip and re-dislocation. The mean mHHSs significantly improved from 43 points (0 to 88) to 67 points (20 to 91; p < 0.001) at the final follow-up, with no differences between the types of bearing. Conclusion: We found that the use of DM bearings reduced the rates of re-dislocation and re-revision in revision THA for recurrent dislocation, but did not guarantee stability. Abductor deficiency is an important predictor of persistent instability.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Hip Dislocation , Hip Prosthesis , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Recurrence , Reoperation , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Female , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Male , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hip Dislocation/surgery , Hip Dislocation/etiology , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiologyABSTRACT
Aims: Instability is a common indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, even after the initial revision, some patients continue to have recurrent dislocation. The aim of this study was to assess the risk for recurrent dislocation after revision THA for instability. Methods: Between 2009 and 2019, 163 patients underwent revision THA for instability at Stanford University Medical Center. Of these, 33 (20.2%) required re-revision due to recurrent dislocation. Cox proportional hazard models, with death and re-revision surgery for periprosthetic infection as competing events, were used to analyze the risk factors, including the size and alignment of the components. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to assess the outcome using the Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical and VR-12 mental scores, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) pain and function, and the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR). Results: The median follow-up was 3.1 years (interquartile range 2.0 to 5.1). The one-year cumulative incidence of recurrent dislocation after revision was 8.7%, which increased to 18.8% at five years and 31.9% at ten years postoperatively. In multivariable analysis, a high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (hazard ratio (HR) 2.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13 to 6.60)), BMI between 25 and 30 kg/m2 (HR 4.31 (95% CI 1.52 to 12.27)), the use of specialized liners (HR 5.39 (95% CI 1.97 to 14.79) to 10.55 (95% CI 2.27 to 49.15)), lumbopelvic stiffness (HR 6.03 (95% CI 1.80 to 20.23)), and postoperative abductor weakness (HR 7.48 (95% CI 2.34 to 23.91)) were significant risk factors for recurrent dislocation. Increasing the size of the acetabular component by > 1 mm significantly decreased the risk of dislocation (HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.96)). The VR-12 physical and HHS (pain and function) scores improved significantly at mid term. Conclusion: Patients requiring revision THA for instability are at risk of recurrent dislocation. Higher ASA grades, being overweight, a previous lumbopelvic fusion, the use of specialized liners, and postoperative abductor weakness are significant risk factors.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Joint Instability , Recurrence , Reoperation , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/etiology , Risk Factors , Prosthesis Failure , Hip Dislocation/surgery , Hip Dislocation/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Hip Prosthesis , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Precise assessment of spinal instability is critical before and after radiotherapy (RT) for evaluating the effectiveness of RT. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of RT in spinal instability over a period of 6 months after RT, utilizing the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) in patients with painful spinal metastasis. We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients who received RT for painful vertebral metastasis in our institution. Mechanical pain at metastatic vertebrae, radiological responses of irradiated vertebrae, and spinal instability were assessed. Follow-up assessments were done at the start of and at intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months after RT, with the pain disappearing in 67%, 85%, 93%, 97%, and 100% of the patients, respectively. The median SINS were 8, 6, 6, 5, 5, and 4 at the beginning and after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months of RT, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that posterolateral involvement of spinal elements (PLISE) was the only risk factor for continuous potentially unstable/unstable spine at 1 month. In conclusion, there was improvement of pain, and recalcification results in regaining spinal stability over time after RT although vertebral body collapse and malalignment occur in some irradiated vertebrae. Clinicians should pay attention to PLISE in predicting continuous potentially unstable/unstable spine.