Comparison of microscopic full-laminectomy (open surgery) and microendoscopic minimally invasive hemilaminectomy for thoracic extramedullary spinal tumours.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive treatments for spinal cord tumours are common. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients with thoracic extramedullary spinal tumours (TEST) treated by microendoscopic minimally invasive surgery-hemilaminectomy through a homemade tubular retractor (MIS-TR) and microscopic full laminectomy (open surgery). METHODS: Between February 2016 and February 2021, 51 patients with TEST were included. According to their clinical data, patients were classified into the MIS-TR group (n = 30) and the open surgery group (n = 21) and assessed. RESULTS: In both groups, the mean operation time, change in perioperative ASIA score, and modified Macnab score were comparable. The average postoperative hospital stay in the MIS-TR group was substantially shorter than that in the open surgery group (p < 0.0001). The mean blood loss volume in the MIS-TR group was substantially lower than that in the open surgery group (p = 0.001). The perioperative complication rate in the MIS-TR group was considerably lower than that in the open surgery group (p < 0.0001). At the 3-month follow-up, there was no substantial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score improvement between the two groups. Nonetheless, at the 12-month follow-up, the average ODI in the MIS-TR group was considerably lower than that in the open surgery group (p = 0.023). The main influencing factors for complete postoperative recovery were preoperative ASIA score (OR 7.848, P = 0.002), surgical complications (OR 0.017, P = 0.008) and age (OR 0.974, P = 0.393). CONCLUSIONS: MIS-TR is safer and more effective than open surgery for treating TEST, but the long-term recovery of MIS-TR is not better than that of open surgery.

The efficacy and safety of decompression with interspinous fixation for lumbar spondylolisthesis when compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A pilot study.

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is widely used to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis because it provides definitive decompression and fixation. Although it has several advantages, it has some disadvantages and risks, such as paraspinal muscle injury, potential intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, hardware failure, subsidence, and medical comorbidity. Lumbar decompressive bilateral laminectomy with interspinous fixation (DLISF) is less invasive and can be used on some patients with PLIF, but this has not been reported. To compare the efficacy and safety of DLISF in the treatment of low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with that of PLIF. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 81 patients with grade I spondylolisthesis, who had undergone PLIF or DLISF and were followed up for more than 1 year. Surgical outcomes, visual analog scale, radiologic outcomes, including Cobb angle and difference in body translation, and postoperative complications were assessed. Forty-one patients underwent PLIF, whereas 40 underwent DLISF. The operative times were 271.0 ±â€…57.2 and 150.6 ±â€…29.3 minutes for the PLIF and DLISF groups, respectively. The estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the PLIF group versus the DLISF group (290.7 ±â€…232.6 vs 122.2 ±â€…82.7 mL, P < .001). Body translation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Overall pain improved during the 1-year follow-up when compared with baseline data. Medical complications were significantly lower in the DLISF group, whereas perioperative complications and hardware issues were higher in the PLIF group. The outcomes of DLISF, which is less invasive, were comparable to PLIF outcomes in patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis. As a salvage technique, DLISF may be a good option when compared with PLIF.

The efficacy of gabapentin supplementation for pain control after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy: A meta-analysis study.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin supplementation may have some potential in pain control after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of gabapentin supplementation on postoperative pain management for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of gabapentin supplementation on the pain control of lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy, gabapentin supplementation was associated with significantly lower pain scores at 2 hours (MD = -2.75; 95% CI = -3.09 to -2.41; P < .00001), pain scores at 4 hours (MD = -2.28; 95% CI = -3.36 to -1.20; P < .0001), pain scores at 24 hours (MD = -0.70; 95% CI = -0.86 to -0.55; P < .00001) and anxiety score compared to control intervention (MD = -1.32; 95% CI = -1.53 to -1.11; P < .00001), but showed no obvious impact on pain scores at 12 hours (MD = -0.58; 95% CI = -1.39 to 0.22; P = .16). In addition, gabapentin supplementation could significantly decrease the incidence of vomiting in relative to control intervention (OR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.12-0.81; P = .02), but they had similar incidence of nausea (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.15-1.73; P = .28). CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin supplementation benefits to pain control after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy.

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Image Reformation for Comparison of Foraminal Cross-Sectional Dimension in Patients Who Have Undergone Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Laminectomy with fusion (LF) is commonly performed with laminoplasty (LP) for cervical myelopathy. Foraminal stenosis is important in the surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. LF and LP can affect foraminal size in different ways. This study aimed to compare foraminal dimensions after LF and LP using a medical computer-assisted design (CAD) program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of the cervical vertebrae of 16 patients with cervical myelopathy were retrospectively viewed in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format on a CAD program. CT images were reformatted in an oblique plane perpendicular to the long axis of each foramen from C2-C3 to C6-C7. The narrowest foraminal crosssectional dimension (FCD) was measured and compared between the LF and LP groups at the operated, non-operated, and C4-C5 levels. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative FCDs was also calculated and compared between the operated and C4-C5 levels. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities for FCD measurements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: At the operated spinal levels, the LF and LP groups showed decreased and increased mean FCDs, respectively. At the adjacent non-operated levels, the mean FCD slightly increased in both the groups. In the LF group, the difference between the preoperative and postoperative FCDs in the C4-C5 levels was larger than that in the other operated levels, but this difference was insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: LF and LP showed contrary results for FCD. Therefore, FCD and kyphosis should be considered for LF and LP. KEY WORDS: three-dimensional, foraminal cross-sectional dimension, laminoplasty, laminectomy fusion, computer-aided design, drafting system, preoperative-postoperative comparison.

Biportal endoscopy-assisted lateral mass screw fixation using a third portal.

BACKGROUND: The technique of spinal decompression under endoscopy has been widely applied, but reports on endoscopic cervical fixation are rare. The unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique stands out for its lesser muscle intrusion and more flexible surgical approach. METHOD: We applied the UBE approach for cervical fixation and laminectomy. We achieved bilateral lateral mass screw fixation by making an auxiliary UBE portal combined with the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Our successful implementation of cervical fixation using the UBE technique at the C3/4 level suggests its efficacy. This approach is a valuable and minimally invasive option for cervical fixation.

Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Sagittal Balance in Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty versus Laminectomy with Fusion for Multilevel Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND This single-center study included 80 patients with multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and aimed to compare postoperative sagittal balance following treatment with expansive open-door laminoplasty (LP) vs total laminectomy with fusion (LF). MATERIAL AND METHODS Data of 80 patients with multilevel OPLL treated with LP vs LF between January 2017 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The basic data, cervical sagittal parameters, and clinical outcomes of the patients were counted in the preoperative and postoperative periods, and complications were recorded. Forty patients underwent LP and 40 underwent LF. Cervical sagittal parameters were compared between and within the 2 groups. Clinical outcomes and complications were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS At last follow-up, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angel, T1 slope (T1S), and C7 slope (C7S) were significantly higher in the LF group than in the LP group (P<0.001). C2-C7 SVA (cSVA) was slightly higher in the LF group (P>0.05) and significantly higher in the LP group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the LP group was significantly lower than in the LF group (P=0.02). The postoperative scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) were significantly improved in both groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Both procedures had good outcomes in neurological improvement. After posterior surgery, the cervical vertebrae all showed a tilting forward. Compared to LP, LF may change cervical balance in Cobb angel, T1S. LF has better efficacy in improving cervical lordosis compared with LP. Patients with high T1 slope after surgery may has more axial pain.

Minimally Invasive Technique for Chiari I Decompression Without Durotomy: Surgical Technique and Preliminary Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Chiari I malformation, marked by severe headaches and potential brainstem/spinal cord issues, often requires surgical intervention when conservative methods fail. This study introduces a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) Chiari decompression technique utilizing a 3-blade retractor, aiming to reduce postoperative discomfort and optimize outcomes. METHODS: Chiari type I malformation patients who underwent a MIS technique were included. Technique consisted of a minimal-soft tissue opening using a 3-blade retractor, suboccipital craniectomy, C1 laminectomy, and resection of the atlantooccipital band without a durotomy. RESULTS: Ten patients were treated. Mean age was 43.3 years, with 7 female patients. All patients presented with occipital headaches; 50% retroorbital pain; 40% neck, upper back, or shoulder pain; and 30% limb paresthesias. Median pre-surgical modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was 3 (2-4) and pain visual analog score (VAS) was 7 (5-9). Mean operative time was 59 (59-71) minutes, with mean blood loss of 88.5 (50-140) mL. In our sample, 90% of patients were discharged the same surgical day (mean 7.2 [5.3-7.7] hours postoperative). No immediate or delayed postoperative complications were evidenced. At 6 months, 90% of patients had mRS 0-1. At last follow-up the mean VAS was 1.5 (range: 0-4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MIS 3-blade flexible retractor technique for Chiari decompression is feasible, provides wide visualization angles of the suboccipital region and C1 arch, allows 2-surgeon work, and minimizes skin and soft tissue disruption. This combination may diminish postoperative discomfort, reduce the risk of surgical site infections, and optimize outcomes.

Practice variation in surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: exploring regional and hospital factors influencing surgical rates.

The presence of significant, unwarranted variation in treatment suggests that clinical decision making also depends on where patients live instead of what they need and prefer. Historically, high practice variation in surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) has been documented. This study aimed to investigate current regional variation in surgical treatment for sciatica resulting from LDDD. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of all Dutch adults (>18 years) between 2016 and 2019. Demographic data from Statistics Netherlands were merged with a nationwide claims database, covering over 99% of the population. Inclusion criteria comprised LDDD diagnosis codes and relevant surgical codes. Practice variation was assessed at the level of postal code areas and hospital service areas (HSAs). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify variables associated with surgical treatment. Among the 119,148 hospital visitors with LDDD, 14,840 underwent surgical treatment. Practice variation for laminectomies and discectomies showed less than two-fold variation in both postal code and HSAs. However, instrumented fusion surgery demonstrated a five-fold variation in postal code areas and three-fold variation in HSAs. Predictors of receiving surgical treatment included opioid prescription and patient referral status. Gender differences were observed, with males more likely to undergo laminectomy or discectomy, and females more likely to receive instrumented fusion surgery. Our study revealed low variation rates for discectomies and laminectomies, while indicating a high variation rate for instrumented fusion surgery in LDDD patients. High-quality research is needed on the extent of guideline implementation and its influence on practice variation.

Biportal endoscopic cervical open-door laminoplasty to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Although cervical laminoplasty is a frequently utilized surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, it is primarily performed using conventional open surgical techniques. We attempted the minimally invasive cervical laminoplasty using biportal endoscopic approach. METHODS: Contralateral lamina access is facilitated by creating space through spinous process drilling, followed by lamina hinge formation. Subsequently, the incised lamina is elevated from ipsilateral aspect, and secure metal plate fixation is performed. CONCLUSION: We successfully performed the cervical open door laminoplasty using biportal endoscopic approach. Biportal endoscopic cervical open-door laminoplasty may be a minimally invasive technique that can prevent complications related with open surgery.

Efficacy of PE-PLIF with a novel ULBD approach for lumbar degeneration diseases: a large-channel endoscopic retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE-PLIF) combined with a novel Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) approach using a large-channel endoscope in treating Lumbar Degenerative Diseases (LDD). METHODS: This retrospective analysis evaluates 41 LDD patients treated with PE-PLIF and ULBD from January 2021 to June 2023. A novel ULBD approach, called 'Non-touch Over-Top' technique, was utilized in this study. We compared preoperative and postoperative metrics such as demographic data, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, surgical details, and radiographic changes. RESULTS: The average follow-up duration was 14.41 ± 2.86 months. Notable improvements were observed postoperatively in VAS scores for back and leg pain (from 5.56 ± 0.20 and 6.95 ± 0.24 to 0.20 ± 0.06 and 0.12 ± 0.05), ODI (from 58.68 ± 0.80% to 8.10 ± 0.49%), and JOA scores (from 9.37 ± 0.37 to 25.07 ± 0.38). Radiographic measurements showed significant improvements in lumbar and segmental lordosis angles, disc height, and spinal canal area. A high fusion rate (97.56% at 6 months, 100% at 12 months) and a low cage subsidence rate (2.44%) were noted. CONCLUSIONS: PE-PLIF combined with the novel ULBD technique via a large-channel endoscope offers significant short-term benefits for LDD management. The procedure effectively expands spinal canal volume, decompresses nerve structures, improves lumbar alignment, and stabilizes the spine. Notably, it improves patients' quality of life and minimizes complications, highlighting its potential as a promising LDD treatment option.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Fusion in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative differences in racial and socioeconomic factors in patients undergoing laminoplasty (LP) versus laminectomy and fusion (LF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCM is prevalent in the United States, requiring surgical intervention to prevent neurological degeneration. While LF is utilized more frequently, LP is an emerging alternative. Previous studies have demonstrated similar neurological outcomes for both procedures. However, treatment selection is primarily at the discretion of the surgeon and may be influenced by social determinants of health that impact surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Quality Outcome Database (QOD), a national spine registry, was queried for adult patients who underwent either LP or LF for the management of DCM. Covariates associated with socioeconomic status, pain and disability, and demographic and medical history were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess patient factors associated with undergoing LP versus LF. RESULTS: Of 1673 DCM patients, 157 (9.4%) underwent LP and 1516 (90.6%) underwent LF. A significantly greater proportion of LP patients had private insurance (P<0.001), a greater than high school level education (P<0.001), were employed (P<0.001), and underwent primary surgery (P<0.001). LP patients reported significantly lower baseline neck/arm pain and Neck Disability Index (P<0.001). In the multivariate regression model, lower baseline neck pain [odds ratio (OR)=0.915, P=0.001], identifying as non-Caucasian (OR=2.082, P<0.032), being employed (OR=1.592, P=0.023), and having a greater than high school level education (OR=1.845, P<0.001) were associated with undergoing LP rather than LF. CONCLUSIONS: In DCM patients undergoing surgery, factors associated with patients undergoing LP versus LF included lower baseline neck pain, non-Caucasian race, higher education, and employment. While symptomatology may influence the decision to choose LP over LF, there may also be socioeconomic factors at play. The trend of more educated and employed patients undergoing LP warrants further investigation.

Ultrasonic bone curette-assisted unilateral approach for bilateral decompression with MIS-TLIF for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of bilateral decompression with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) assisted by an ultrasonic bone curette (UBC) for treating severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) and traditional tool laminectomy decompression MIS-TLIF for treating severe DLSS. METHODS: The clinical data of 128 patients with single-segment severe DLSS who were admitted between January 2017 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 67 patients were treated with unilateral fenestration and bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF using an ultrasonic bone curette (UBC group), whereas 61 patients were treated with unilateral fenestration and bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF using traditional tools (traditional group, control). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate back and lower limb pain before the operation,immediate postoperative, and one week, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the operation. Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Zurich claudication score (ZCQ) were employed to evaluate the improvement in low back and lower limb function. At the last follow-up, the Bridwell bone graft fusion standard was utilized to evaluate bone graft fusion. RESULTS: The decompression time of laminectomy was significantly shorter in the UBC group than in the traditional group (control group), and the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume were significantly less in those in the control group (P < 0.05). The VAS, ODI, and ZCQ scores of the two groups after the operation were significantly improved compared to those before the operation (P < 0.05). The UBC group had better VAS back scores than the control group immediate postoperative and one week after the operation(P < 0.05). The UBC group had better VAS lower limb scores than the control group immediate postoperative (P < 0.05).The incidence of perioperative complications, hospitalization time, dural sac cross-sectional area (CSA), and dural sac CSA improvement rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). VAS and ODI scores did not differ significantly between the two groups before,three, six months, one year, and two years after surgery (P > 0.05). The ZCQ scores did not differ significantly between the two groups before the operation at one week, six months, one year, and two years after the operation (P > 0.05). According to the Bridwell bone graft fusion standard, bone graft fusion did not occur significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05) at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: UBC unilateral fenestration bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF in treating severe DLSS can achieve clinical efficacy as traditional tool unilateral fenestration bilateral decompression MIS-TLIF and reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage. It can also shorten the operation time, effectively reduce the work intensity of the operator, and reduce the degree of low back pain during short-term follow-ups. Therefore, this is a safe and effective surgical method.

A Novel "De-tension"-guided Anterior Decompression Strategy-Thoracic Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement Fusion (TACAF) for Multilevel Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Study with at Least 2-Year Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: To propose a novel surgical strategy-thoracic anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (TACAF) to treat multilevel thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (mT-OPLL), and investigate its safety and efficacy. METHODS: Between January 2019 and December 2021, a total of 49 patients with thoracic myelopathy due to mT-OPLL surgically treated with TACAF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographic data, radiologic parameters, and surgery-related complications, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, thoracic kyphosis (TK), kyphosis angle in fusion area (FSK), thoracic curvature, spinal cord curvature, and curvature of curved rod in surgical region, diameter, and area of the spinal cord at the most compressed level were included. RESULTS: All patients acquired satisfactory recovery of neurologic function and overall complication rate was low at the final follow up. The mean mJOA of the laminectomy+TACAF and Full Lamina Preservation +TACAF groups, respectively, was 3.74 ± 2.05, 3.67 ± 1.95 before surgery, and 9.97 ± 0.83, 9.80 ± 0.68 at the final followed up, with the recovery rate of 84.26% ± 14.20%, 82.79% ± 10.35%, as to VAS Scores. The mean FSK was 34.50 ± 4.46,35.33 ± 3.44 before surgery, and was restored to 20.97 ± 5.70, 22.93 ± 6.34 at the final followed up respectively, as to mean TK (P < 0.05). Spinal cord curvature was improved from 34.12 ± 3.59, 33.93 ± 3.45 before surgery to 19.47 ± 3.53, 18.80 ± 3.17 at the final follow-up respectively, as to thoracic curvature (P < 0.05). In addition, the area and diameter of the spinal cord was also significantly improved at the final follow up (all P < 0.05). The curvature of the thoracic pulp and thoracic vertebra is closely related to the curvature of the rod. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of the pelvis and the slope value of the sacrum. CONCLUSIONS: This strategy provides a novel solution for the treatment of mT-OPLL with favorable recovery of neurological function, the tension of spinal cord, and fewer complications.

Comparison of Laminectomy with Fusion and Laminoplasty Treating Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Comparing laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) and comparative analysis of neck pain and sagittal cervical parameters. METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively analyzed MCSM patients treated with LF or LP in our department between June 2018 and January 2023, with at least a 12-month follow-up. T-tests were used to identify operation time, hemoglobin, hospital stay, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, cervical range of motion (cROM), and C4/5 anterior and posterior spinal canal diameter (A-P diameter) and area. Nonparametric tests were used to identify visual analog scale (VAS) score (assessing neck pain). Pearson correlation analyses were used to identify the neck pain. RESULTS: Of all 67 patients (LF: 24, LP: 43), both groups' mJOA scores significantly improved (P < 0.001). The VAS scores had both significantly decreased, with the LF group exhibiting a more marked reduction (LF: P < 0.001, LP: P = 0.037). Both groups' C4/5 A-P diameters and areas increased significantly (P < 0.001). The cROM had both significantly decreased, with the LF group exhibiting a greater reduction. At the last follow-up, the LF group's T1 slope and C2-C7 Cobb angle considerably increased, and pain VAS scores substantially correlated with the C2-C7 Cobb angle (R = -0.451, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LF and LP were efficacious for MCSM. LF relieved neck pain better but caused greater reduction in cervical mobility. Cervical lordosis improvement was significantly correlated with neck pain alleviation.

Postoperative Adjacent Segment Disease in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Adjacent Laminectomy for Grade I-II Spondylolisthesis and Adjacent Spinal Stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies have demonstrated increased risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after open fusion with adjacent-level laminectomy, with rates ranging from 16%-47%, potentially related to disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex. Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches may offer a more durable result. We report institutional outcomes of simultaneous MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MISTLIF) and adjacent-level laminectomy for patients with low grade spondylolisthesis and ASD. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent MISTLIF with adjacent level laminectomy to treat grade I-II spondylolisthesis with adjacent stenosis at a single institution from 2007-2022. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients met criteria, with mean follow-up of 23.1 months. In total, 37 levels were fused and 45 laminectomies performed. In this group, 21 patients received a single level laminectomy and single-level MISTLIF, 10 patients received a 2-level laminectomy and single-level MISTLIF, 2 patients received a single-level laminectomy and 2-level MISTLIF, and 1 patient received a 2-level laminectomy and 2-level MISTLIF. Three (8.8%) patients experienced clinically significant postoperative ASD requiring reoperation. Three other patients required reoperation for other reasons. Multiple logistic regression did not reveal any association between development of ASD and surgical covariates. CONCLUSION: MISTLIF with adjacent-level laminectomy demonstrated a favorable safety profile with rates of postoperative ASD lower than published rates after open fusion and on par with the published rates of ASD from MISTLIF alone. Future prospective studies may better elucidate the durability of adjacent-level laminectomies when performed alongside MISTLIF, but retrospective data suggests it is safe and durable.

Surgical management of a multilevel thoracolumbar aneurysmal bone cyst.

Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are primary bone tumours that rarely occur in the spine and generally affect one vertebral level in adolescents. Here, we present an unusual case of a multilevel thoracolumbar ABC, which presented a unique surgical challenge due to its infiltrative and destructive nature. A teenage male presented with back pain, paresthesias and a mildly spastic gait. MRI of the thoracolumbar spine revealed an expansive, multicystic mass extending from the left T12-L1 vertebral bodies into adjacent musculature. The patient underwent a two-stage surgical approach with decompression of the spinal cord and instrumentation to stabilise the vertebral column. The first stage involved posterior decompression, laminectomy and facetectomies, followed by pedicle-based instrumentation from T10 to L3. This was followed by a vertebrectomy and anterior stabilisation with an expansile cage from T11 to L2. A gross total resection was achieved with the patient maintaining full neurological function.

Clinical Analysis of Microwave Ablation Combined with Decompression and Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.

OBJECTIVES: There is still controversy over the choice of treatment for end-stage spinal metastases. With the continuous development of microwave technology in spinal tumors, related studies have reported that microwave combined with techniques such as pedicle screw fixation and percutaneous vertebroplasty can achieve the purpose of tumor ablation, relieving spinal cord compression, enhancing spinal stability, effectively relieving pain, and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of microwave ablation combined with decompression and pedicle screw fixation in the palliative management of spinal metastases with pathological fractures. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with spinal metastases and pathological fractures treated between January 2016 and July 2020, with 44 patients undergoing pedicle screw fixation along with laminectomy (fixation group) and the remaining 38 receiving microwave ablation in addition to the treatment provided to group fixation (MWA group). Before surgery, all patients underwent pain assessment using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and evaluation of spinal cord injury using the Frankel classification. After surgery, the patients' prognoses were assessed using the Tomita score, modified Tokuhashi score system, and progression-free survival. Additionally, we compared operative time and blood loss between the two groups. Survival analysis utilized the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test for group comparisons. Paired t-tests and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied to metric and non-normally distributed data, respectively. Neurological function improvement across groups was evaluated using the χ2 test. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for a median duration of 18 and 20 months in the fixation and MWA groups, respectively, with follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 36 months. Statistically significant reductions in postoperative VAS scores were observed in all patients compared with their preoperative scores. The MWA group exhibited reduced blood loss (t = 2.74, p = 0.01), lower VAS scores at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups (t = 2.34, P = 0.02; t = 2.83, p = 0.006), and longer progression-free survival than the fixation group (p = 0.03). Although the operation times in the MWA group were longer than those in the fixation group, this difference was not statistically significant (t = 6.06, p = 0.12). No statistically significant differences were found regarding improvements in spinal cord function between the two groups (p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Compared with decompression and pedicle screw fixation for treating spinal metastases with pathological fractures, microwave ablation combined with decompression and pedicle screw fixation showed better outcomes in terms of pain control, longer progression-free survival, and lower blood loss without increasing operative time, which has favorable implications for clinical practice.

Resection of intradural spinal lesions with concomitant instrumented fusion in children: a systematic review and representative cases.

OBJECTIVE: More than one-third of pediatric patients who undergo resection of intradural spine lesions develop progressive postoperative deformity, with as many as half of these patients subsequently requiring surgical fusion. Intradural spinal procedures with simultaneous instrumented fusion in children, however, are infrequently performed. Moreover, the rationale for patient selection, outcomes, and safety of this single-stage surgery in children has not been systematically investigated. In this study, the authors review the practice of simultaneous intradural spinal resection and instrumented fusion in pediatric patients and provide two representative case examples from their institution. METHODS: The authors searched the PubMed and Embase databases and performed a systematic review following the PRISMA protocol. Original articles of pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years) who underwent intradural spine surgery, regardless of pathology, with concomitant instrumented fusion and reported outcomes were included. An institutional database of all spinal operations with instrumented fusion performed in patients aged ≤ 18 years over a 3-year period was screened to identify those who underwent intradural spine surgery with concomitant fusion. RESULTS: Nine patients (median age 12 years) from 6 studies who underwent intradural lesion resection and concomitant fusion met inclusion criteria. Among all 11 patients included, primary rationales for concomitant fusion were extensive bone removal (i.e., corpectomy or total facetectomy, 73%), concerns for deformity in the setting of multilevel laminectomy/laminoplasty (18%), and severe baseline deformity (9%). The most represented pathology was neurenteric cyst (55%) followed by schwannoma (18%). Myxopapillary ependymoma, granular cell tumor, and pilocytic astrocytoma each were seen in 1 case. Seven patients (64%) underwent an anterior-approach corpectomy, tumor resection, and fusion, while the remaining 4 patients (36%) underwent a posterior approach. All patients with at least 1 year of follow-up cases achieved bony fusion. CSF leak and new-onset neurological deficit each occurred in 9% (1/11). CONCLUSIONS: The rationales for performing single-stage intradural resection and fusion in pediatric patients in studies to date include the presence of severe baseline deformity, large extent of bone resection, and multilevel laminectomy/laminoplasty across cervicothoracic or thoracolumbar junctions. As current literature involving this cohort is limited, more data are needed to determine when concomitant fusion in intradural resections is appropriate in pediatric patients and whether its routine implementation is safe or beneficial.

The Effect of Slime Factor in the Treatment of Spinal Implant Infections.

AIM: To investigate the effect of the biofilm-forming ability of the bacteria on treatment in rats by using biofilm-forming and nonbiofilm- forming strains of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty rats were divided into four equal groups as Group 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B. All rats underwent single distance lumbar laminectomy, and titanium implants were introduced. Group 1 rats were inoculated with Slime factor (-) S. aureus, while Group 2 rats were inoculated with biofilm Slime factor (+) S. aureus. None of the rats were given antibiotics. One week later, the surgical field was reopened and microbiological samples were taken. The implants of rats in Groups 1A and 2A were left in place, while the implants of rats in Groups 1B and 2B were removed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups inoculated with slime factor (+) S. aureus; although, Groups 1A and 2A showed statistically significant difference. Statistical analysis with respect to bacterial count also showed a statistically significant difference between Groups 1A and 2A. There was a statistically significant difference between Group 1B and 2B. CONCLUSION: The results obtained in the present study reveal that in case of implant-dependent infection, the first sample taken can be checked for slime factor, and if there is infection with slime factor-negative bacterium, treatment without removing the implant may be recommended. S. aureus was used in the study because it is the most common cause of implant-related infection at surgical sites. Further studies using different bacterial species are needed to reach a definitive conclusion.