Get law enforcement out of biospecimen authentication.

Use of D NA markers in research that are used in law enforcement risks undermining public trust and participation.

O cumprimento da Lei nº 13168 de 6 de outubro de 2015 por cursos de Odontologia do Sul e Sudeste do Brasil: uma análise dos sítios eletrônicos institucionais / Compliance with Law nº 13168 of October 6, 2015, by Dentistry courses in the South and Southeast of Brazil: an analysis of institutional websites

A Lei nº 13.168, de 6 de outubro de 2015, determina entre outros aspectos, que as Instituições de Ensino Superior (IES) brasileiras tragam em seus sítios eletrônicosoficiaisinformações relativas àmatrizcurricular e corpo docente do curso ofertado. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a prevalência de cumprimento dessa lei em IES que ofertam o curso de Odontologia, tendo como amostra IES das regiões Sudeste e Sul do país. Para isso, as IES foram catalogadasa partir doportal e-MEC do Ministério da Educação, e posteriormentetiveram seus sítios eletrônicos oficiais acessados. Observou-seentão o cumprimento das determinações do artigo, parágrafo, incisos, e alíneas da referida lei. Os dados foram descritos por meio defrequências absolutas e relativas e comparados pelo Teste Exato de Fisher (α=5%). Aplicados os critérios de elegibilidade, 256 IES foram incluídas, sendo 220 IES privadas e 36 públicas. De acordo com os critérios de análise adotados, apenas 3 (1,17%) das IES cumpriram todas as exigências da lei. A disponibilização da lista das disciplinas que compõem a matriz curricular de cada curso foi de 78,1%. Por outro lado, informações relativas ao corpo docente foram disponibilizadas por uma baixa porcentagem de IES, tais como identificação do corpo docente (40,6%), as disciplinas que efetivamente cada docente leciona (13,7%), titulação (30,1%) e tempo de trabalho na IES (8,6%). Do mesmo modo, uma baixa porcentagem foi observada quanto àatualização (11,7%) e data completa da última atualização (14,8%). Em conclusão, a maior parte das IES analisadas não está de acordo com Lei nº 13.168/15, sendo necessário que os coordenadores de curso e gestores estejam atentosà necessidade de adequação dos sítios eletrônicos institucionais (AU).

Law No. 13,168, of October 6, 2015, determines, among other things, that Brazilian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) bring on their official websites information regarding the curriculum and teaching staff of the course offered. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of compliance with this law in HEIs that offer the Dentistry course, using HEIs from the Southeast and South regions of the country as a sample. For this, the HEIs were cataloged on the Ministry of Education's e-MEC portal, and later had their official websites accessed. It was observed whether the HEI portals complied with the provisions of the article, paragraph, items, and paragraphs of the aforementioned law. Data were described using absolute and relative frequencies and compared using Fisher's exact test at a significance level of 5%. After applying the eligibility criteria, 256 HEIs were included, being 220 private HEIs and 36 public. According to the analysis criteria adopted, only 3 (1.17%) of the HEIs complied with all the requirements of the law. The availability of the list of subjects that make up the curriculum of each course was 78.1%. On the other hand, information related to the teaching staff was made available by a low percentage of HEIs, such as identification ofthe teaching staff (40.6%), the subjects that each professor actually teaches (13.7%), titles (30.1 %), and working time at the HEI (8.6%). Likewise, a low percentage was observed regarding the updating of the curriculum (11.7%) and the presence of the complete date of the last update (14.8%). In conclusion, most Brazilian Dentistry HEIs do not comply with Law No. 13.168/15, making it necessary for course coordinators and education managers to pay attention to the need to adapt institutional websites (AU).

Regulating forensic genetic genealogy.

Maryland 's new law provides a model for others.

Racial and ethnic disparities in "stop-and-frisk" experience among young sexual minority men in New York City.

Although racial/ethnic disparities in police contact are well documented, less is known about other dimensions of inequity in policing. Sexual minority groups may face disproportionate police contact. We used data from the P18 Cohort Study (Version 2), a study conducted to measure determinants of inequity in STI/HIV risk among young sexual minority men (YSMM) in New York City, to measure across-time trends, racial/ethnic disparities, and correlates of self-reported stop-and-frisk experience over the cohort follow-up (2014-2019). Over the study period, 43% reported stop-and-frisk with higher levels reported among Black (47%) and Hispanic/Latinx (45%) than White (38%) participants. Stop-and-frisk levels declined over follow-up for each racial/ethnic group. The per capita rates among P18 participants calculated based on self-reported stop-and-frisk were much higher than rates calculated based on New York City Police Department official counts. We stratified respondents' ZIP codes of residence into tertiles of per capita stop rates and observed pronounced disparities in Black versus White stop-and-frisk rates, particularly in neighborhoods with low or moderate levels of stop-and-frisk activity. YSMM facing the greatest economic vulnerability and mental disorder symptoms were most likely to report stop-and-frisk. Among White respondents levels of past year stop-and-frisk were markedly higher among those who reported past 30 day marijuana use (41%) versus those reporting no use (17%) while among Black and Hispanic/Latinx respondents stop-and-frisk levels were comparable among those reporting marijuana use (38%) versus those reporting no use (31%). These findings suggest inequity in policing is observed not only among racial/ethnic but also sexual minority groups and that racial/ethnic YSMM, who are at the intersection of multiple minority statuses, face disproportionate risk. Because the most socially vulnerable experience disproportionate stop-and-frisk risk, we need to reach YSMM with community resources to promote health and wellbeing as an alternative to targeting this group with stressful and stigmatizing police exposure.

Supporting social hierarchy is associated with White police officers' use of force.

Three studies translate social dominance theory to policing, testing the relationship between individual officers' endorsement of social hierarchies and their tendency to use force against residents. This article demonstrates a link between officer psychological factors and force. Because police are empowered to use force to maintain social order, and because White officers hold a dominant racial identity, we hypothesized social dominance orientation (SDO) would relate to force positively for White officers. For Black officers, we hypothesized a weak relationship between SDO and force, if any. To test these predictions, we examined the relationships between SDO and force using negative binomial regression models stratified by officer race. In an eastern city, SDO relates to force incidents positively for White officers and negatively for Black officers. In a southern city, SDO relates to force positively for White officers, and not significantly for Black officers. Stratified by race and rank, a second eastern city shows a marginally significant, positive SDO/force relationship for White patrol officers, and no significant SDO/force relationship for Black patrol officers. Finally, testing our hypotheses on a dataset pooled across these cities revealed a positive SDO/force relationship among White officers, and no significant SDO/force relationship among Black officers. These findings are consistent with our hypotheses and suggest a need to examine the role that maintaining social hierarchies plays in police behaviors. Future research must continue to investigate these relationships, especially with larger samples of non-White officers, and information about officers' patrol environments.

Valid or voodoo? A qualitative study of attorney perceptions of risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining.

Prior research largely has explored judicial perceptions of risk assessment in sentencing. Little is known about how other court actors, specifically, prosecutors and defense attorneys, perceive risk assessments in the sentencing process. Here, we report a qualitative study on the use of risk assessment by prosecutors and defense attorneys in Virginia. A prior survey (n = 70) pointed to a statistically significant difference in how prosecutors and defense attorneys view the role of recidivism risk in sentencing. On the basis of the results of this quantitative study, we collected follow-up qualitative data via interview (n = 30) to explain this unexpected difference. Analysis confirmed the survey findings that prosecutors and defense attorneys differ in their perceptions of risk assessment in sentencing. Results suggest that court actor perceptions vary as a function of professional role in the service of the identified client (the community or the defendant) and their interests. Although perceptions diverged on utility risk assessment in sentencing, both prosecutors and defense attorneys were outspoken in their skepticism of the Nonviolent Risk Assessment instrument that is used to predict recidivism risk in Virginia. This latter finding identifies obstacles that may emerge as jurisdictions adopt a risk-based approach to sentencing. We conclude with recommendations for addressing these barriers that may provide useful guidance on the implementation process.

Sharing reports about domestic violence and abuse with general practitioners: a qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: Domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is common and damaging to health. UK national guidance advocates a multi-agency response to DVA, and domestic homicide reviews consistently recommend improved information-sharing between agencies. Identification of patients experiencing DVA in general practice may come from external information shared with the practice, such as police incident reports and multi-agency risk assessment conference (MARAC) reports. The aim of this study was to explore the views of general practitioners (GPs) and the police about sharing reports about DVA with GPs. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs, police staff and a partnership manager. Participants were located across England and Wales. Thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 23 GPs, six police staff and one former partnership manager. Experiences of information-sharing with GPs about DVA varied. Participants described the relevance and value of external reports to GPs to help address the health consequences of DVA and safeguard patients. They balanced competing priorities when managing this information in the electronic medical record, namely visibility to GPs versus the risk of unintended disclosure to patients. GPs also spoke of the judgements they made about exploring DVA with patients based on external reports, which varied between abusive and non-abusive adults and children. Some felt constrained by short general practice consultations. Some police and GPs reflected on a loss of control when information about DVA was shared between agencies, and the risk of unintended consequences. Both police and GPs highlighted the importance of clear information and a shared understanding about responsibility for action. CONCLUSION: GPs regarded external reports about DVA as relevant to their role, but safely recording this information in the electronic medical record and using it to support patients required complex judgements. Both GPs and police staff emphasised the importance of clarity of information and responsibility for action when information was shared between agencies about patients affected by DVA.

Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond.

False confessions are a contributing factor in almost 30% of DNA exonerations in the United States. Similar problems have been documented all over the world. We present a novel framework to highlight the processes through which innocent people, once misidentified as suspects, experience cumulative disadvantages that culminate in pernicious consequences. The cumulative-disadvantage framework details how the innocent suspect's naivete and the interrogator's presumption of guilt trigger a process that can lead to false confession, the aftereffects of which spread to corrupt evidence gathering, bias forensic analysis, and virtually ensure wrongful convictions at trial or through pressured false guilty pleas. The framework integrates nascent research underscoring the enduring effects of the accumulated disadvantages postconviction and even after exoneration. We synthesize findings from psychological science, corroborating naturalistic evidence, and relevant legal precedents to explain how an innocent suspect's disadvantages can accumulate through the actions of law enforcement, forensic examiners, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, juries, and appeals courts. We conclude with prescribed research directions that can lead to empirically driven reforms to address the gestalt of the multistage process.

Considerations for Modernized Criminal HIV Laws and Assessment of Legal Protections Against Release of Identified HIV Surveillance Data for Law Enforcement.

In November 2018, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention distributed guidance to funded agencies under its Integrated HIV Surveillance and Prevention Programs Initiative to support the implementation of the program's third strategy: HIV transmission cluster investigation and outbreak response efforts. Cluster detection seeks to identify persons infected with HIV (diagnosed and undiagnosed) who are linked to infections in single or related sexual and injection drug networks. Identifying expanding clusters allows public health personnel to intervene directly where active HIV transmissions occur.However, in the context of HIV infection where most US states have enacted criminal exposure laws, these efforts have sparked concerns about the protection of HIV surveillance data from court order or subpoena for law enforcement purposes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls for funded agencies to evaluate relevant confidentiality laws to ensure that these are sufficient to protect the confidentiality of HIV surveillance data from use by law enforcement.We present four often overlooked factors about the criminalization of HIV exposure and HIV surveillance data protections that should be considered in statutory assessments.

Society of Behavioral Medicine Position Statement: Congress should protect immigrants seeking health care.

According to the Migration Policy Institute (2019), as of 2017 the USA was home to approximately 44 million immigrants, the largest number of immigrants in the world. Most of these immigrants relocate from Mexico, India, China, the Philippines, El Salvador, Vietnam, Cuba, and the Dominican Republic. Since 2017, there have been increased reports of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) interventions toward immigrants, especially at and near previously delineated "safe areas" such as medical facilities, as immigrants sought health care. Currently, health care providers are reporting delays and reductions in health care seeking by immigrants. This increases risks of untreated health problems for the immigrants themselves as well as their communities. To protect the health of immigrants, and the general public, the Society of Behavioral Medicine joins the American College of Physicians (2011) and the American Medical Association (2017) in recommending that Congress impose restrictions on ICE interventions in or around medical facilities.

Risk and resources: A qualitative perspective on low-level sentencing in Virginia.

Virginia's sentencing guidelines include alternative sanctions based on the use of a quantitative instrument called the Nonviolent Risk Assessment (NVRA) that identifies individuals convicted of drug and property crimes that are considered to be at lower risk of recidivism. Although nondispositive, the NVRA affords judges the discretion to grant alternative sentences to eligible low-risk defendants. In this study, we explore how judges make use of the NVRA instrument when sentencing individuals convicted of low-level drug and property crimes. Through semistructured interviews (N = 24) and inductive thematic analysis, the research team identified contextual factors that influence the use of the NVRA results, including: the availability of alternative programs in a community, the role of court actors, particularly prosecutors, in shaping the sentencing outcomes, as well as an individual judge's willingness to defer to or reject negotiated plea agreements offered by the prosecutor. Our research shows that while some judges are aware of and embrace the benefits of the instrument, others lack knowledge altogether of its function and empirical basis. We identified seven themes that account for variation in how actuarial risk is utilized in the sentencing process. Our findings provide insight into the practical challenges of using risk-based assessment as a tool for the sentencing of low-level convictions. As more states adopt risk-based approaches to sentencing, studying Virginia, which has gone farther than other states in legislating this strategy, becomes increasingly important.

El aseguramiento del daño en la Ley 14/2007, de Investigación Biomédica / The insurance of the damage in the Law 14/2007, of Biomedical Research

La realización de procedimientos invasivos en seres humanos que impliquen un riesgo físico o psíquico con fines de investigación, debe contar con un seguro de responsabilidad que compense los posibles daños. La elección del tipo de aseguramiento tiene repercusiones directas tanto en los derechos de las personas que participan como en la calidad ética de la propia investigación. Existen buenas razones basadas en la justicia compensatoria para optar por un sistema de aseguramiento que no sólo obligue a la contratación de un seguro, sino que también establezca un sistema de responsabilidad objetiva en el que se presuponga la relación de causalidad entre la investigación biomédica y los daños que puedan producirse. La obligación de contratar un seguro específico se puede excepcionar cuando sea una investigación que implique un nivel bajo de intervención o un riesgo mínimo siempre que los posibles daños estén cubiertos por un seguro colectivo o individua

The performance of invasive procedures in humans that involve a physical or psychological risk for research purposes, must have a liability insurance that compensates for possible damages. The choice of type of insurance has direct repercussions both on the people rights involved and on the ethical quality of the research itself. There are good reasons based on compensatory justice to opt for an insurance system that not only requires the purchase of insurance but also establishes a system of strict liability in which assumes the causal relationship between biomedical research and damages that may occur. The obligation to contract a specific insurance can be excepted when it is an investigation that implies a low level of intervention or a minimum risk provided that the possible damages are covered by a collective or individual insurance