Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 3.895
1.
Brain Behav ; 14(6): e3548, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841819

BACKGROUND: The revised Lublin classification offers a framework for categorizing multiple sclerosis (MS) according to the clinical course and imaging results. Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS (SPMS) is often delayed by a period of uncertainty. Several quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) markers are associated with progressive disease states, but they are not usually available in clinical practice. METHODS: The MAGNON project enrolled 629 patients (early relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), n = 51; RRMS with suspected SPMS, n = 386; SPMS, n = 192) at 55 centers in Germany. Routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at baseline and after 12 months were analyzed using a centralized automatic processing pipeline to quantify lesions and normalized brain and thalamic volume. Clinical measures included relapse activity, disability, and MS phenotyping. Neurologists completed questionnaires before and after receiving the qMRI reports. RESULTS: According to the physicians' reports, qMRI results changed their assessment of the patient in 31.8% (baseline scan) and 27.6% (follow-up scan). For ∼50% of patients with RRMS with suspected SPMS, reports provided additional information that the patient was transitioning to SPMS. In >25% of all patients, this information influenced the physicians' assessment of the patient's current phenotype. However, actual changes of treatment were reported only in a minority of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The MAGNON results suggest that standardized qMRI reports may be integrated into the routine clinical care of MS patients and support the application of the Lublin classification as well as treatment decisions. The highest impact was reported in patients with suspected SPMS, indicating a potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty.


Brain , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Female , Adult , Male , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/diagnostic imaging , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/pathology , Disease Progression , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Germany
2.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 25(7): 473-487, 2024 Jul 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829936

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and computed tomography (CCT) are advanced imaging modalities that recently revolutionized the conventional diagnostic approach to congenital heart diseases (CHD), supporting echocardiography and often replacing cardiac catheterization. This is the second of two complementary documents, endorsed by experts from the Working Group of the Italian Society of Pediatric Cardiology and the Italian College of Cardiac Radiology of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, aimed at giving updated indications on the appropriate use of CMR and CCT in different clinical CHD settings, in both pediatrics and adults. In this article, support is also given to radiologists, pediatricians, cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons for indications and appropriateness criteria for CMR and CCT in the most referred CHD, following the proposed new criteria presented and discussed in the first document. This second document also examines the impact of devices and prostheses for CMR and CCT in CHD and additionally presents some indications for CMR and CCT exams when sedation or narcosis is needed.


Consensus , Heart Defects, Congenital , Humans , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Italy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Cardiology/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Child , Predictive Value of Tests , Adult , Societies, Medical/standards
3.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 45(8): e26747, 2024 Jun 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825981

Electroencephalography (EEG) functional connectivity (FC) estimates are confounded by the volume conduction problem. This effect can be greatly reduced by applying FC measures insensitive to instantaneous, zero-lag dependencies (corrected measures). However, numerous studies showed that FC measures sensitive to volume conduction (uncorrected measures) exhibit higher reliability and higher subject-level identifiability. We tested how source reconstruction contributed to the reliability difference of EEG FC measures on a large (n = 201) resting-state data set testing eight FC measures (including corrected and uncorrected measures). We showed that the high reliability of uncorrected FC measures in resting state partly stems from source reconstruction: idiosyncratic noise patterns define a baseline resting-state functional network that explains a significant portion of the reliability of uncorrected FC measures. This effect remained valid for template head model-based, as well as individual head model-based source reconstruction. Based on our findings we made suggestions how to best use spatial leakage corrected and uncorrected FC measures depending on the main goals of the study.


Connectome , Electroencephalography , Nerve Net , Humans , Electroencephalography/methods , Electroencephalography/standards , Adult , Connectome/standards , Connectome/methods , Female , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Nerve Net/diagnostic imaging , Nerve Net/physiology , Young Adult , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiology
4.
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging ; 6(3): e230271, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842455

Purpose To provide a comprehensive head-to-head comparison and temporal analysis of cardiac MRI indications between the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines to identify areas of consensus and divergence. Materials and Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines published until May 2023 were systematically screened for recommendations related to cardiac MRI. The class of recommendation (COR) and level of evidence (LOE) for cardiac MRI recommendations were compared between the two guidelines and between newer versus older versions of each guideline using χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Results ESC guidelines included 109 recommendations regarding cardiac MRI, and ACC/AHA guidelines included 90 recommendations. The proportion of COR I and LOE B was higher in ACC/AHA versus ESC guidelines (60% [54 of 90] vs 46.8% [51 of 109]; P = .06 and 53% [48 of 90] vs 35.8% [39 of 109], respectively; P = .01). The increase in the number of cardiac MRI recommendations over time was significantly higher in ESC guidelines (from 63 to 109 for ESC vs from 65 to 90 for ACC/AHA; P = .03). The main areas of consensus were found in heart failure and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, while the main divergences were in valvular heart disease, arrhythmias, and aortic disease. Conclusion ESC guidelines included more recommendations related to cardiac MRI use, whereas the ACC/AHA recommendations had higher COR and LOE. The number of cardiac MRI recommendations increased significantly over time in both guidelines, indicating the increasing role of cardiac MRI evaluation and management of cardiovascular disease. Keywords: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Guideline, European Society of Cardiology, ESC, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, ACC/AHA Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.


American Heart Association , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , United States , Europe , Cardiology/standards , Cardiology/trends , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Societies, Medical
6.
Neurology ; 102(10): e209386, 2024 May 28.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710005

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Updated criteria for the clinical-MRI diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) have recently been proposed. However, their performance in individuals without symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) presentations is less defined. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the Boston criteria version 2.0 for CAA diagnosis in a cohort of individuals ranging from cognitively normal to dementia in the community and memory clinic settings. METHODS: Fifty-four participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging or Alzheimer's Disease Research Center were included if they had an antemortem MRI with gradient-recall echo sequences and a brain autopsy with CAA evaluation. Performance of the Boston criteria v2.0 was compared with v1.5 using histopathologically verified CAA as the reference standard. RESULTS: The median age at MRI was 75 years (interquartile range 65-80) with 28/54 participants having histopathologically verified CAA (i.e., moderate-to-severe CAA in at least 1 lobar region). The sensitivity and specificity of the Boston criteria v2.0 were 28.6% (95% CI 13.2%-48.7%) and 65.3% (95% CI 44.3%-82.8%) for probable CAA diagnosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.47) and 75.0% (55.1-89.3) and 38.5% (20.2-59.4) for any CAA diagnosis (possible + probable; AUC 0.57), respectively. The v2.0 Boston criteria were not superior in performance compared with the prior v1.5 criteria for either CAA diagnostic category. DISCUSSION: The Boston criteria v2.0 have low accuracy in patients who are asymptomatic or only have cognitive symptoms. Additional biomarkers need to be explored to optimize CAA diagnosis in this population.


Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy/pathology , Aged , Female , Male , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Aged, 80 and over , Sensitivity and Specificity , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/pathology , Cerebral Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Hemorrhage/pathology
7.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 45(8): e26707, 2024 Jun 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38798082

Development of deep learning models to evaluate structural brain changes caused by cognitive impairment in MRI scans holds significant translational value. The efficacy of these models often encounters challenges due to variabilities arising from different data generation protocols, imaging equipment, radiological artifacts, and shifts in demographic distributions. Domain generalization (DG) techniques show promise in addressing these challenges by enabling the model to learn from one or more source domains and apply this knowledge to new, unseen target domains. Here we present a framework that utilizes model interpretability to enhance the generalizability of classification models across various cohorts. We used MRI scans and clinical diagnoses from four independent cohorts: Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI, n = 1821), the Framingham Heart Study (FHS, n = 304), the Australian Imaging Biomarkers & Lifestyle Study of Ageing (AIBL, n = 661), and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC, n = 4647). With this data, we trained a deep neural network to focus on areas of the brain identified as relevant to the disease for model training. Our approach involved training a classifier to differentiate between structural neurodegeneration in individuals with normal cognition (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). This was achieved by aligning class-wise attention with a unified visual saliency prior, which was computed offline for each class using all the training data. Our method not only competes with state-of-the-art approaches but also shows improved correlation with postmortem histology. This alignment with the gold standard evidence is a significant step towards validating the effectiveness of DG frameworks, paving the way for their broader application in the field.


Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Deep Learning , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neuroimaging , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/diagnostic imaging , Alzheimer Disease/pathology , Aged , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Female , Male , Neuroimaging/methods , Neuroimaging/standards , Aged, 80 and over , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnostic imaging , Cognitive Dysfunction/pathology , Cohort Studies
8.
Neuroimage ; 295: 120635, 2024 Jul 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729542

In pursuit of cultivating automated models for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to aid in diagnostics, an escalating demand for extensive, multisite, and heterogeneous brain imaging datasets has emerged. This potentially introduces biased outcomes when directly applied for subsequent analysis. Researchers have endeavored to address this issue by pursuing the harmonization of MRIs. However, most existing image-based harmonization methods for MRI are tailored for 2D slices, which may introduce inter-slice variations when they are combined into a 3D volume. In this study, we aim to resolve inconsistencies between slices by introducing a pseudo-warping field. This field is created randomly and utilized to transform a slice into an artificially warped subsequent slice. The objective of this pseudo-warping field is to ensure that generators can consistently harmonize adjacent slices to another domain, without being affected by the varying content present in different slices. Furthermore, we construct unsupervised spatial and recycle loss to enhance the spatial accuracy and slice-wise consistency across the 3D images. The results demonstrate that our model effectively mitigates inter-slice variations and successfully preserves the anatomical details of the images during the harmonization process. Compared to generative harmonization models that employ 3D operators, our model exhibits greater computational efficiency and flexibility.


Brain , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Algorithms , Neuroimaging/methods , Neuroimaging/standards
9.
J Integr Neurosci ; 23(5): 100, 2024 May 14.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812383

BACKGROUND: Multiple radiomics models have been proposed for grading glioma using different algorithms, features, and sequences of magnetic resonance imaging. The research seeks to assess the present overall performance of radiomics for grading glioma. METHODS: A systematic literature review of the databases Ovid MEDLINE PubMed, and Ovid EMBASE for publications published on radiomics for glioma grading between 2012 and 2023 was performed. The systematic review was carried out following the criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis, a total of 7654 patients from 40 articles, were assessed. R-package mada was used for modeling the joint estimates of specificity (SPE) and sensitivity (SEN). Pooled event rates across studies were performed with a random-effects meta-analysis. The heterogeneity of SPE and SEN were based on the χ2 test. Overall values for SPE and SEN in the differentiation between high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs) were 84% and 91%, respectively. With regards to the discrimination between World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 and WHO grade 3, the overall SPE was 81% and the SEN was 89%. The modern non-linear classifiers showed a better trend, whereas textural features tend to be the best-performing (29%) and the most used. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that present radiomics' diagnostic performance for glioma grading is superior in terms of SEN and SPE for the HGGs vs. LGGs discrimination task when compared to the WHO grade 4 vs. 3 task.


Brain Neoplasms , Glioma , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasm Grading , Glioma/diagnostic imaging , Glioma/pathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Neuroimaging/standards , Neuroimaging/methods , Radiomics
10.
Brain Nerve ; 76(5): 481-486, 2024 May.
Article Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741486

Magnetic resonance neurography requires varying imaging techniques based on the site of imaging and anticipated disease. In assessing the brachial and lumbosacral plexus, a three-dimensional (3D) spin echo method, such as 3D-short tau inversion recovery imaging, is frequently employed. It's beneficial to familiarize oneself with the imaging sequence and understand the appearance of normal images in advance. The imaging parameters used in our institute are provided below as a reference. When interpreting the images, pay close attention to nerve thickening, signal intensity changes, asymmetry between the left and right sides, and irregularities in nerve caliber. Efforts are underway to standardize qualitative assessments and quantify signals through technological advancements.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Lumbosacral Plexus/diagnostic imaging
11.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 70, 2024 May 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711044

BACKGROUND: Recently, diagnostic criteria including a standardized MRI criterion were presented to identify patients suffering from idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) proposing that IIH might be defined by two out of three objective findings (papilledema, ≥ 25 cm cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure (CSF-OP) and ≥ 3/4 neuroimaging signs). METHODS: To provide independent external validation, we retrospectively applied the proposed diagnostic criteria to our cohort of patients with clinical suspicion of IIH from the Vienna IIH database. Neuroimaging was reevaluated for IIH signs according to standardized definitions by a blinded expert neuroradiologist. We determined isolated diagnostic accuracy of the neuroimaging criterion (≥ 3/4 signs) as well as overall accuracy of the new proposed criteria. RESULTS: We included patients with IIH (n = 102) and patients without IIH (no-IIH, n = 23). Baseline characteristics were balanced between IIH and no-IIH groups, but papilledema and CSF-OP were significantly higher in IIH. For the presence of ≥ 3/4 MRI signs, sensitivity was 39.2% and specificity was 91.3% with positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.2% and negative predictive value (NPV) 25.3%. Reclassifying our cohort according to the 2/3 IIH definition correctly identified 100% of patients without IIH, with definite IIH and suggested to have IIH without papilledema by Friedman criteria, respectively. CONCLUSION: The standardized neuroimaging criteria are easily applicable in clinical routine and provide moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity to identify patients with IIH. Defining IIH by 2/3 criteria significantly simplifies diagnosis without compromising accuracy.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Pseudotumor Cerebri , Humans , Female , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Adult , Pseudotumor Cerebri/diagnostic imaging , Pseudotumor Cerebri/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Middle Aged , Papilledema/diagnostic imaging , Papilledema/diagnosis
12.
Hum Brain Mapp ; 45(7): e26692, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712767

In neuroimaging studies, combining data collected from multiple study sites or scanners is becoming common to increase the reproducibility of scientific discoveries. At the same time, unwanted variations arise by using different scanners (inter-scanner biases), which need to be corrected before downstream analyses to facilitate replicable research and prevent spurious findings. While statistical harmonization methods such as ComBat have become popular in mitigating inter-scanner biases in neuroimaging, recent methodological advances have shown that harmonizing heterogeneous covariances results in higher data quality. In vertex-level cortical thickness data, heterogeneity in spatial autocorrelation is a critical factor that affects covariance heterogeneity. Our work proposes a new statistical harmonization method called spatial autocorrelation normalization (SAN) that preserves homogeneous covariance vertex-level cortical thickness data across different scanners. We use an explicit Gaussian process to characterize scanner-invariant and scanner-specific variations to reconstruct spatially homogeneous data across scanners. SAN is computationally feasible, and it easily allows the integration of existing harmonization methods. We demonstrate the utility of the proposed method using cortical thickness data from the Social Processes Initiative in the Neurobiology of the Schizophrenia(s) (SPINS) study. SAN is publicly available as an R package.


Cerebral Cortex , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Schizophrenia , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Schizophrenia/diagnostic imaging , Schizophrenia/pathology , Cerebral Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Cortex/anatomy & histology , Neuroimaging/methods , Neuroimaging/standards , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Male , Female , Adult , Normal Distribution , Brain Cortical Thickness
13.
Seizure ; 117: 275-283, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579502

OBJECTIVE: Accurate detection of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a pivotal role in the preoperative assessment of epilepsy. The integration of multimodal imaging has demonstrated substantial value in both diagnosing FCD and devising effective surgical strategies. This study aimed to enhance MRI post-processing by incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) analysis. We sought to compare the diagnostic efficacy of diverse image post-processing methodologies in patients presenting MRI-negative FCD. METHODS: In this retrospective investigation, we assembled a cohort of patients with negative preoperative MRI results. T1-weighted volumetric sequences were subjected to morphometric analysis program (MAP) and composite parametric map (CPM) post-processing techniques. We independently co-registered images derived from various methods with PET scans. The alignment was subsequently evaluated, and its correlation was correlated with postoperative seizure outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were enrolled in the study. In the PET-MAP(p = 0.0189) and PET-CPM(p = 0.00041) groups, compared with the non-overlap group, the overlap group significantly associated with better postoperative outcomes. In PET(p = 0.234), CPM(p = 0.686) and MAP(p = 0.672), there is no statistical significance between overlap and seizure-free outcomes. The sensitivity of using the CPM alone outperformed the MAP (0.65 vs 0.46). The use of PET-CPM demonstrated superior sensitivity (0.96), positive predictive value (0.83), and negative predictive value (0.91), whereas the MAP displayed superior specificity (0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested a superiority in sensitivity of CPM in detecting potential FCD lesions compared to MAP, especially when it is used in combination with PET for diagnosis of MRI-negative epilepsy patients. Moreover, we confirmed the superiority of synergizing metabolic imaging (PET) with quantitative maps derived from structural imaging (MAP or CPM) to enhance the identification of subtle epileptogenic zones (EZs). This study serves to illuminate the potential of integrated multimodal techniques in advancing our capability to pinpoint elusive pathological features in epilepsy cases.


Epilepsy , Focal Cortical Dysplasia , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Epilepsy/diagnostic imaging , Focal Cortical Dysplasia/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Multimodal Imaging/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography/standards , Retrospective Studies
14.
Brain Behav ; 14(5): e3505, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688879

INTRODUCTION: The current study examined the contributions of comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and volumetric assessment of selected mesial temporal subregions on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and mild probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in a memory clinic cohort. METHODS: Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and automated entorhinal, transentorhinal, and hippocampal volume measurements were conducted in 40 healthy controls, 38 patients with subjective memory symptoms, 16 patients with aMCI, 16 patients with mild probable AD dementia. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare the neuropsychological and MRI measures. RESULTS: Combining the neuropsychological and MRI measures improved group membership prediction over the MRI measures alone but did not improve group membership prediction over the neuropsychological measures alone. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment was an important tool to evaluate cognitive impairment. The mesial temporal volumetric MRI measures contributed no diagnostic value over and above the determinations made through neuropsychological assessment.


Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neuropsychological Tests , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/diagnostic imaging , Alzheimer Disease/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Male , Female , Aged , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnostic imaging , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Middle Aged , Hippocampus/diagnostic imaging , Hippocampus/pathology , Neuroimaging/methods , Neuroimaging/standards , Cohort Studies
15.
Hippocampus ; 34(6): 302-308, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38593279

Researchers who study the human hippocampus are naturally interested in how its subfields function. However, many researchers are precluded from examining subfields because their manual delineation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (still the gold standard approach) is time consuming and requires significant expertise. To help ameliorate this issue, we present here two protocols, one for 3T MRI and the other for 7T MRI, that permit automated hippocampus segmentation into six subregions, namely dentate gyrus/cornu ammonis (CA)4, CA2/3, CA1, subiculum, pre/parasubiculum, and uncus along the entire length of the hippocampus. These protocols are particularly notable relative to existing resources in that they were trained and tested using large numbers of healthy young adults (n = 140 at 3T, n = 40 at 7T) whose hippocampi were manually segmented by experts from MRI scans. Using inter-rater reliability analyses, we showed that the quality of automated segmentations produced by these protocols was high and comparable to expert manual segmenters. We provide full open access to the automated protocols, and anticipate they will save hippocampus researchers a significant amount of time. They could also help to catalyze subfield research, which is essential for gaining a full understanding of how the hippocampus functions.


Hippocampus , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Hippocampus/diagnostic imaging , Male , Adult , Female , Young Adult , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Reproducibility of Results
16.
Neuroimage ; 292: 120604, 2024 Apr 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604537

Despite its widespread use, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) has been criticized for low test-retest reliability. To improve reliability, researchers have recommended using extended scanning durations, increased sample size, and advanced brain connectivity techniques. However, longer scanning runs and larger sample sizes may come with practical challenges and burdens, especially in rare populations. Here we tested if an advanced brain connectivity technique, dynamic causal modeling (DCM), can improve reliability of fMRI effective connectivity (EC) metrics to acceptable levels without extremely long run durations or extremely large samples. Specifically, we employed DCM for EC analysis on rsfMRI data from the Human Connectome Project. To avoid bias, we assessed four distinct DCMs and gradually increased sample sizes in a randomized manner across ten permutations. We employed pseudo true positive and pseudo false positive rates to assess the efficacy of shorter run durations (3.6, 7.2, 10.8, 14.4 min) in replicating the outcomes of the longest scanning duration (28.8 min) when the sample size was fixed at the largest (n = 160 subjects). Similarly, we assessed the efficacy of smaller sample sizes (n = 10, 20, …, 150 subjects) in replicating the outcomes of the largest sample (n = 160 subjects) when the scanning duration was fixed at the longest (28.8 min). Our results revealed that the pseudo false positive rate was below 0.05 for all the analyses. After the scanning duration reached 10.8 min, which yielded a pseudo true positive rate of 92%, further extensions in run time showed no improvements in pseudo true positive rate. Expanding the sample size led to enhanced pseudo true positive rate outcomes, with a plateau at n = 70 subjects for the targeted top one-half of the largest ECs in the reference sample, regardless of whether the longest run duration (28.8 min) or the viable run duration (10.8 min) was employed. Encouragingly, smaller sample sizes exhibited pseudo true positive rates of approximately 80% for n = 20, and 90% for n = 40 subjects. These data suggest that advanced DCM analysis may be a viable option to attain reliable metrics of EC when larger sample sizes or run times are not feasible.


Brain , Connectome , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Sample Size , Connectome/methods , Connectome/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiology , Adult , Female , Male , Rest/physiology , Time Factors
17.
Neuroimage ; 292: 120617, 2024 Apr 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636639

A primary challenge to the data-driven analysis is the balance between poor generalizability of population-based research and characterizing more subject-, study- and population-specific variability. We previously introduced a fully automated spatially constrained independent component analysis (ICA) framework called NeuroMark and its functional MRI (fMRI) template. NeuroMark has been successfully applied in numerous studies, identifying brain markers reproducible across datasets and disorders. The first NeuroMark template was constructed based on young adult cohorts. We recently expanded on this initiative by creating a standardized normative multi-spatial-scale functional template using over 100,000 subjects, aiming to improve generalizability and comparability across studies involving diverse cohorts. While a unified template across the lifespan is desirable, a comprehensive investigation of the similarities and differences between components from different age populations might help systematically transform our understanding of the human brain by revealing the most well-replicated and variable network features throughout the lifespan. In this work, we introduced two significant expansions of NeuroMark templates first by generating replicable fMRI templates for infants, adolescents, and aging cohorts, and second by incorporating structural MRI (sMRI) and diffusion MRI (dMRI) modalities. Specifically, we built spatiotemporal fMRI templates based on 6,000 resting-state scans from four datasets. This is the first attempt to create robust ICA templates covering dynamic brain development across the lifespan. For the sMRI and dMRI data, we used two large publicly available datasets including more than 30,000 scans to build reliable templates. We employed a spatial similarity analysis to identify replicable templates and investigate the degree to which unique and similar patterns are reflective in different age populations. Our results suggest remarkably high similarity of the resulting adapted components, even across extreme age differences. With the new templates, the NeuroMark framework allows us to perform age-specific adaptations and to capture features adaptable to each modality, therefore facilitating biomarker identification across brain disorders. In sum, the present work demonstrates the generalizability of NeuroMark templates and suggests the potential of new templates to boost accuracy in mental health research and advance our understanding of lifespan and cross-modal alterations.


Brain , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Adult , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Young Adult , Male , Aged , Female , Middle Aged , Infant , Child , Aging/physiology , Child, Preschool , Reproducibility of Results , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Aged, 80 and over , Neuroimaging/methods , Neuroimaging/standards , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards
18.
Mov Disord ; 39(5): 825-835, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38486423

BACKGROUND: International clinical criteria are the reference for the diagnosis of degenerative parkinsonism in clinical research, but they may lack sensitivity and specificity in the early stages. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis, through visual reading or machine-learning approaches, improves diagnostic accuracy compared with clinical diagnosis at an early stage in patients referred for suspected degenerative parkinsonism. MATERIALS: Patients with initial diagnostic uncertainty between Parkinson's disease (PD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and multisystem atrophy (MSA), with brain MRI performed at the initial visit (V1) and available 2-year follow-up (V2), were included. We evaluated the accuracy of the diagnosis established based on: (1) the international clinical diagnostic criteria for PD, PSP, and MSA at V1 ("Clin1"); (2) MRI visual reading blinded to the clinical diagnosis ("MRI"); (3) both MRI visual reading and clinical criteria at V1 ("MRI and Clin1"), and (4) a machine-learning algorithm ("Algorithm"). The gold standard diagnosis was established by expert consensus after a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: We recruited 113 patients (53 with PD, 31 with PSP, and 29 with MSA). Considering the whole population, compared with clinical criteria at the initial visit ("Clin1": balanced accuracy, 66.2%), MRI visual reading showed a diagnostic gain of 14.3% ("MRI": 80.5%; P = 0.01), increasing to 19.2% when combined with the clinical diagnosis at the initial visit ("MRI and Clin1": 85.4%; P < 0.0001). The algorithm achieved a diagnostic gain of 9.9% ("Algorithm": 76.1%; P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Our study shows the use of MRI analysis, whether by visual reading or machine-learning methods, for early differentiation of parkinsonism. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Early Diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Multiple System Atrophy , Parkinson Disease , Parkinsonian Disorders , Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive , Humans , Female , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive/diagnostic imaging , Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive/diagnosis , Parkinsonian Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Parkinsonian Disorders/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/diagnostic imaging , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Multiple System Atrophy/diagnostic imaging , Multiple System Atrophy/diagnosis , Machine Learning , Uncertainty , Diagnosis, Differential , Sensitivity and Specificity
19.
Neuroimage Clin ; 42: 103585, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531165

Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) provides researchers and clinicians with a powerful tool to examine functional connectivity across large-scale brain networks, with ever-increasing applications to the study of neurological disorders, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI). While rsfMRI holds unparalleled promise in systems neurosciences, its acquisition and analytical methodology across research groups is variable, resulting in a literature that is challenging to integrate and interpret. The focus of this narrative review is to address the primary methodological issues including investigator decision points in the application of rsfMRI to study the consequences of TBI. As part of the ENIGMA Brain Injury working group, we have collaborated to identify a minimum set of recommendations that are designed to produce results that are reliable, harmonizable, and reproducible for the TBI imaging research community. Part one of this review provides the results of a literature search of current rsfMRI studies of TBI, highlighting key design considerations and data processing pipelines. Part two outlines seven data acquisition, processing, and analysis recommendations with the goal of maximizing study reliability and between-site comparability, while preserving investigator autonomy. Part three summarizes new directions and opportunities for future rsfMRI studies in TBI patients. The goal is to galvanize the TBI community to gain consensus for a set of rigorous and reproducible methods, and to increase analytical transparency and data sharing to address the reproducibility crisis in the field.


Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnostic imaging , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/physiopathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiopathology , Rest/physiology , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Brain Mapping/methods , Brain Mapping/standards
20.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ; 26(1): 101040, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522522

BACKGROUND: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of the myocardium has significant diagnostic and prognostic implications, with even small areas of enhancement being important. Distinguishing between definitely normal and definitely abnormal LGE images is usually straightforward, but diagnostic uncertainty arises when reporters are not sure whether the observed LGE is genuine or not. This uncertainty might be resolved by repetition (to remove artifact) or further acquisition of intersecting images, but this must take place before the scan finishes. Real-time quality assurance by humans is a complex task requiring training and experience, so being able to identify which images have an intermediate likelihood of LGE while the scan is ongoing, without the presence of an expert is of high value. This decision-support could prompt immediate image optimization or acquisition of supplementary images to confirm or refute the presence of genuine LGE. This could reduce ambiguity in reports. METHODS: Short-axis, phase-sensitive inversion recovery late gadolinium images were extracted from our clinical cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) database and shuffled. Two, independent, blinded experts scored each individual slice for "LGE likelihood" on a visual analog scale, from 0 (absolute certainty of no LGE) to 100 (absolute certainty of LGE), with 50 representing clinical equipoise. The scored images were split into two classes-either "high certainty" of whether LGE was present or not, or "low certainty." The dataset was split into training, validation, and test sets (70:15:15). A deep learning binary classifier based on the EfficientNetV2 convolutional neural network architecture was trained to distinguish between these categories. Classifier performance on the test set was evaluated by calculating the accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC AUC). Performance was also evaluated on an external test set of images from a different center. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred and forty-five images (from 272 patients) were labeled and split at the patient level into training (1151 images), validation (247 images), and test (247 images) sets for the deep learning binary classifier. Of these, 1208 images were "high certainty" (255 for LGE, 953 for no LGE), and 437 were "low certainty". An external test comprising 247 images from 41 patients from another center was also employed. After 100 epochs, the performance on the internal test set was accuracy = 0.94, recall = 0.80, precision = 0.97, F1-score = 0.87, and ROC AUC = 0.94. The classifier also performed robustly on the external test set (accuracy = 0.91, recall = 0.73, precision = 0.93, F1-score = 0.82, and ROC AUC = 0.91). These results were benchmarked against a reference inter-expert accuracy of 0.86. CONCLUSION: Deep learning shows potential to automate quality control of late gadolinium imaging in CMR. The ability to identify short-axis images with intermediate LGE likelihood in real-time may serve as a useful decision-support tool. This approach has the potential to guide immediate further imaging while the patient is still in the scanner, thereby reducing the frequency of recalls and inconclusive reports due to diagnostic indecision.


Contrast Media , Deep Learning , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Predictive Value of Tests , Humans , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Databases, Factual , Myocardium/pathology , Male , Female , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine/standards , Middle Aged , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Observer Variation , Aged , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards
...