ABSTRACT
This mini review delves into the complex issue of mortality linked to malnutrition, highlighting its multifaceted nature beyond just biomedical factors, presenting it as an intricate intersectional phenomenon. Method: The mini-review methodology involved a systematic literature search across databases like PubMed and Scielo, focusing on malnutrition and infant mortality in Colombia. We used specific keywords and Boolean operators to identify relevant studies, emphasizing socio-economic, gender, and ethnic factors, while excluding non-peer-reviewed and outdated publications. Results: The relationship between gender and food/nutrition has deep historical and cultural roots. Patriarchal norms influence dietary habits based on gender roles, often placing undue responsibility on mothers for children's nutritional health, reflecting profound social intersections. Mortality due to malnutrition is most prevalent among indigenous and Afro-descendant children in rural, conflict-affected areas with limited access to healthcare. Unpaid domestic work restricts women's economic independence, intensifying challenges for single-parent households. Conclusion: A comprehensive understanding can shift institutional attitudes toward mothers, leading to more coherent policy strategies and effective interventions.
Subject(s)
Infant Mortality , Humans , Colombia/epidemiology , Infant , Infant Mortality/trends , Female , Malnutrition/mortality , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , MaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Muscle loss is one of the phenotypic criteria of malnutrition, is highly prevalent in patients with cirrhosis, and is associated with adverse outcomes. Mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) estimates the skeletal muscle mass and is especially helpful in cases of fluid overload. This study aimed to propose MAMC cutoff points for patients with cirrhosis and demonstrate its association with 1-year mortality. METHODS: This is an analysis of cohort databases from five reference centers in Brazil that included inpatients and outpatients with cirrhosis aged ≥18 y. The nutritional variables obtained were the MAMC (n = 1075) and the subjective global assessment (n = 629). We established the MAMC cutoff points stratified by sex based on the subjective global assessment as a reference standard for malnutrition diagnosis, considering the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index. An adjusted Cox regression model was used to test the association of MAMC cutoff points and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: We included 1075 patients with cirrhosis, with a mean age of 54.8 ± 11.3 y; 70.4% (n = 757) male. Most patients had alcoholic cirrhosis (47.1%, n = 506) and were classified as Child-Pugh B (44.7%, n = 480). The MAMC cutoff points for moderate and severe depletion were ≤21.5 cm and ≤24.2 cm; ≤20.9 cm and ≤22.9 cm for women and men, respectively. According to these cutoff points, 13.8% (n = 148) and 35.1% (n = 377) of the patients had moderate or severe MAMC depletion, respectively. The 1-year mortality rate was 17.3% (n = 186). In the multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, age, MELD-Na, and Child-Pugh scores, a severe depletion in MAMC was an independent increased risk factor for 1-year mortality (HR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.24-2.35, P < 0.001). Each increase of 1 cm in MAMC values was associated with an 11% reduction in 1-year mortality risk (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low MAMC classified according to the new cutoff points predicts mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis and could be used in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Arm , Liver Cirrhosis , Malnutrition , Muscle, Skeletal , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/mortality , Liver Cirrhosis/mortality , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Brazil/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Nutritional Status , Nutrition Assessment , Proportional Hazards Models , Cohort Studies , Sarcopenia/mortality , Sarcopenia/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nutrition risk is prevalent in intensive care unit (ICU) settings and related to poor prognoses. We aimed to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity of different nutrition risk screening tools in the ICU. METHODS: Data were collected between 2019 and 2022 in six ICUs (n = 450). Nutrition risk was evaluated by modified Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (mNUTRIC), Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and Nutritional Risk in Emergency (NRE-2017). Accuracy and agreement of the tools were assessed; logistic regression was used to verify the association between nutrition risk and prolonged ICU stay; Cox regression was used for mortality in the ICU, both with adjustment for confounders. RESULTS: NRS-2002 ≥5 showed the best accuracy (0.63 [95% CI, 0.58-0.69]) with mNUTRIC, and MST with NRS-2002 ≥5 (0.76 [95% CI, 0.71-0.80]). All tools had a poor/fair agreement with mNUTRIC (k = 0.019-0.268) and moderate agreement with NRS-2002 ≥5 (k = 0.474-0.503). MUST (2.26 [95% CI 1.40-3.63]) and MST (1.69 [95% CI, 1.09-2.60]) predicted death in the ICU, and the NRS-2002 ≥5 (1.56 [95% CI 1.02-2.40]) and mNUTRIC (1.86 [95% CI, 1.26-2.76]) predicted prolonged ICU stay. CONCLUSION: No nutrition risk screening tool demonstrated a satisfactory concurrent validity; only the MUST and MST predicted ICU mortality and the NRS-2002 ≥5 and mNUTRIC predicted prolonged ICU stay, suggesting that it could be appropriate to adopt the ESPEN recommendation to assess nutrition status in patients with ≥48 h in the ICU.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Malnutrition , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , Humans , Critical Illness/mortality , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Malnutrition/mortality , Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , AdultABSTRACT
Em pacientes críticos o risco nutricional e a hiperglicemia associam-se ao aumento da incidência de desfechos desfavoráveis. Objetivo: Avaliar a relação do risco nutricional pelo Nutrition Risk in Critically III, versão modificada (mNUTRIC) e perfil glicêmico nos desfechos de alta, óbito e tempo de internação de pacientes críticos e verificar o impacto das ferramentas Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II (APACHE II) e do Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) nesses desfechos. Método: Estudo longitudinal prospectivo desenvolvido em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI). Foram incluídos adultos, com tempo ≥ 48 horas de internação e com registro mínimo de duas aferições glicêmicas. Excluíram-se pacientes em cuidados paliativos, readmitidos nas UTI e gestantes. O teste Exato de Fisher e Shapiro Wilk foram utilizados para avaliar as variáveis categóricas e contínuas, respectivamente. Posteriormente, utilizou-se o teste de Mann-Whitney ou t-Student não pareado. Realizou-se análise de regressão logística e linear. O nível de significância adotado foi de 5%. Resultados: Ao avaliar 35 pacientes, 45,7% apresentaram alto risco nutricional. Foi observado associação do risco nutricional com os desfechos de alta e óbito; o SOFA associou-se ao óbito e tempo de internação. O incremento de 1 ponto no escore do SOFA aumentou a chance de óbito em 83% e tempo maior de internação em 0,49 dias. O perfil glicêmico e APACHE II não se associou aos desfechos. Conclusão: o escore SOFA foi o instrumento que apresentou associações significativas com o desfecho do óbito e maior tempo de internação de pacientes críticos
In critically ill patients, nutritional risk and hyperglycemia are associated with an increased incidence of unfavorable outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the relationship of nutritional risk by the Nutrition Risk in Critically III, modified version (mNUTRIC) and glycemic profile in the outcomes of discharge, death and length of stay in critically ill patients and to verify the impact of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II (APACHE II) and the Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) tools on these outcomes. Method: Prospective longitudinal study developed in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Adults were included, with ≥ 48 hours of hospitalization and with a minimum record of two blood glucose measurements. Patients in palliative care, readmitted to ICU and pregnant women were excluded. Fisher's Exact test and Shapiro Wilk test were used to evaluate categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Subsequently, the Mann-Whitney or unpaired t-Student test was used. Logistic and linear regression analysis was performed. The significance level adopted was 5%. Results: When evaluating 35 patients, 45.7% were at high nutritional risk. An association was observed between nutritional risk and discharge and death outcomes; SOFA was associated with death and length of hospital stay. The increment of 1 point in the SOFA score increased the chance of death by 83% and a longer hospital stay by 0.49 days. Glycemic profile and APACHE II were not associated with outcomes. Conclusion: the SOFA score was the instrument that showed significant associations with the outcome of death and longer hospital stay in critically ill patients
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Blood Glucose , Malnutrition/physiopathology , Patient Acuity , Patient Discharge , Nutrition Surveys/methods , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , APACHE , Malnutrition/mortality , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Hyperglycemia/mortality , Intensive Care Units , Length of StayABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acutely ill older adults are at higher risk of malnutrition. This study aimed to explore the applicability and accuracy of the GLIM criteria to diagnose malnutrition in acutely ill older adults in the emergency ward (EW). METHODS: We performed a retrospective secondary analysis, of an ongoing cohort study, in 165 participants over 65 years of age admitted to the EW of a Brazilian university hospital. Nutrition assessment included anthropometry, the Simplified Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA). We diagnosed malnutrition using GLIM criteria, defined by the parallel presence of at least one phenotypic [nonvolitional weight loss (WL), low BMI, low muscle mass (MM)] and one etiologic criterion [reduced food intake or assimilation (RFI), disease burden/inflammation]. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox and logistic regression for data analyses. RESULTS: GLIM criteria, following the MNA-SF screening, classified 50.3% of participants as malnourished, 29.1% of them in a severe stage. Validation of the diagnosis using MNA-FF as a reference showed good accuracy (AUC = 0.84), and moderate sensitivity (76%) and specificity (75.1%). All phenotypic criteria combined with RFI showed the best metrics. Malnutrition showed a trend for an increased risk of transference to intensive care unit (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 0.99, 4.35), and severe malnutrition for in-hospital mortality (HR = 4.23, 95% CI 1.2, 14.9). CONCLUSION: GLIM criteria, following MNA-SF screening, appear to be a feasible approach to diagnose malnutrition in acutely ill older adults in the EW. Nonvolitional WL combined with RFI or acute inflammation were the best components identified and are easily accessible, allowing their potential use in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment/methods , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Mass Screening/standards , Nutrition Assessment , Risk Assessment/standards , Acute Disease/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anthropometry , Brazil , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Malnutrition/mortality , Pilot Projects , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Introduction: the COVID-19 pandemic put the world's population at risk. As the relationship between nutritional risk and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is still poorly understood, a multidisciplinary research team of the Argentine Society of Intensive Care (SATI) conducted a multicenter study aimed to define nutritional features, and to evaluate the relationship between nutritional risk and relevant clinical outcomes for COVID-19 patients in an intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: a multicenter, prospective, observational study including twelve Argentinian ICUs was conducted between March and October 2020. Inclusion criteria were: adult patients older than 18 years who were admitted to the ICU with a COVID-19 diagnosis were included. Clinical data included comorbidities scores, and nutritional screening tools such as the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) 2002, and the modified NUTRIC score (mNUTRIC SCORE) were used. In addition, clinical outcomes including overall mortality, mechanical ventilation (MV) days, and ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Results: a total of 285 ICU patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 61.24 (SD = 14.6) years; APACHE-II, 14.2 (SD = 6.6); Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), 2.3 (SD = 2.3). Most patients were admitted from the emergency room to the ICU. Hypertension, obesity, and diabetes were the most common comorbidities. Nutritional assessment showed that 36.9 % were SGA B+C, and 46 % were obese. Mean ICU LOS was 22.2 (SD = 19.5), and hospital LOS was 28.1 (SD = 21.9) days. Of all patients, 90.2 % underwent MV, and MV days were 20.6 (SD = 15.6). The univariate and multivariate analyses showed that risk factors for COVID-19 mortality were (odds ratio [95 % confidence interval]): SGA score of B or C: 2.13 [1.11-4.06], and NRS 2002 ≥ 3: 2.25 [1.01-5.01]. Conclusions: in the present study, nutritional status (SGA) and NRS 2002 were major mortality risk factors for CODIV-19 patients in the ICU.
INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la pandemia de COVID-19 puso en riesgo a la población mundial. Dado que la relación entre el riesgo nutricional y los resultados clínicos en pacientes críticos con COVID-19 es aún poco conocida, un equipo de investigación multidisciplinario de la Sociedad Argentina de Cuidados Intensivos (SATI) realizó un estudio multicéntrico con el objetivo de definir las características nutricionales y evaluar la relación entre el riesgo nutricional y los resultados clínicos relevantes para los pacientes de la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) de COVID-19. Métodos: entre marzo y octubre de 2020 se realizó un estudio observacional prospectivo y multicéntrico que incluyó 12 UCI argentinas. Criterios de inclusión: se incluyeron pacientes adultos mayores de 18 años que habían ingresado en la UCI con diagnóstico de COVID-19. Se utilizaron datos clínicos que incluían scores de comorbilidades, herramientas de cribado nutricional como la Evaluación Global Subjetiva (EGS) y el Cribado de Riesgo Nutricional (NRS) 2002, y la puntuación NUTRIC. Además. Se registraron los resultados clínicos, incluida la mortalidad, los días de ventilación mecánica (VM) y la duración de la estancia en la UCI y hospitalaria en general. Resultados: en total, 285 pacientes en UCI cumplieron nuestros criterios de inclusión. La edad media fue de 61,24 (DE = 14,6) años, la puntuación APACHE-II de 14,2 (DE = 6,6) y el índice de comorbilidad de Charlson (ICC) de 2,3 (DE = 2,3). La mayoría de los pacientes ingresaron desde la sala de emergencias a la UCI. La hipertensión, la obesidad y la diabetes fueron las comorbilidades más frecuentes. La evaluación nutricional mostró que el 36,9 % eran VGS B + C y el 46 % eran obesos. La estancia en la UCI fue de 22,2 (DE = 19,5) y la hospitalaria de 28,1 (DE = 21,9) días. El 90,2 % se sometieron a VM, siendo la media de días de VM de 20,6 (DE = 15,6). El análisis univariado y multivariado mostró que los factores de riesgo de mortalidad por COVID-19 eran (razón de posibilidades [intervalo de confianza del 95 %]): puntuación SGA de B o C: 2,13 [1,11-4,06], y NRS 2002 ≥ 3: 2,25 [1,01-5,01]. Conclusiones: en el presente estudio, el estado nutricional (EGS) y el NRS 2002 fueron los principales factores de riesgo de mortalidad para los pacientes con COVID-19 en la UCI.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , APACHE , Aged , Argentina/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Comorbidity , Critical Illness , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Male , Malnutrition/mortality , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Across the globe, the prevalence of hospital malnutrition varies greatly depending on the population served and on local socioeconomic conditions. While malnutrition is widely recognized to worsen patient outcomes and add financial burdens to healthcare systems, recent data on hospital malnutrition in Latin America are limited. Our study objectives were: (1) to quantify the prevalence of malnutrition risk in Latin American hospital wards, and (2) to explore associations between nutritional risk status, in-hospital food intake, and health outcomes. METHODS: On nutritionDay (nDay), a specific day every year, hospital wards worldwide can participate in a one-day, cross-sectional audit. We analyzed nDay data collected in ten Latin American countries from 2009 to 2015, including demographic and nutrition-related findings for adult patients (≥18 years) from 582 hospital wards/units. Based on patient-reported responses to questions related to the Malnutrition Screening Tool, we determined the prevalence of malnutrition risk (MST score ≥2). We also summarized patient-reported food intake on nDay, and we analyzed staff-collected outcome data at 30 days post-nDay. RESULTS: The prevalence of malnutrition risk in the Latin American nDay study population (N = 14,515) was 39.6%. More than 50% of studied patients ate one-half or less of their hospital meal, ate less than normal in the week before nDay, or experienced weight loss in the prior three months. The hospital-mortality hazard ratio was 3.63 (95% CI [2.71, 4.88]; P < 0.001) for patients eating one-quarter of their meal (compared with those who ate the full meal), increasing to 6.6 (95% CI [5.02, 8.7]; P < 0.0001) for patients who ate none of the food offered. CONCLUSIONS: Based on compilation of nDay surveys throughout Latin America, 2 of every 5 hospitalized patients were at risk for malnutrition. The associated risk for hospital mortality was up to 6-fold higher among patients who ate little or none of their meal on nDay. This high prevalence showed scant improvement over rates two decades ago-a compelling rationale for new focus on nutrition education and training of professionals in acute care settings.
Subject(s)
Diet/mortality , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Malnutrition/mortality , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Eating , Female , Humans , Latin America/epidemiology , Male , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Meals , Middle Aged , Nutrition Surveys , Nutritional Status , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prevalence , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Assessment , Weight Loss , Young AdultABSTRACT
Antecedentes: La desnutrición es un importante problema de salud en el grupo de edad de pediatría que contribuye a aumentar la mortalidad y morbilidad de los pacientes ingresados. Pacientes y método: Estudio descriptivo, aleatorizado, transversal de 2965 casos entre 6 y 60 meses de los cuales 500 casos tenían desnutrición desde el 15 de noviembre de 2019 al 31 de enero de 2020, datos hospitalarios para evaluar la incidencia de desnutrición aguda severa y desnutrición aguda moderada y leve. Desnutrición y su relación con algunos factores sociodemográficos (trabajo paterno, peso al nacer, tipo de alimentación, edad, sexo). Resultados: la incidencia de desnutrición aguda severa es 1%, la incidencia de desnutrición aguda moderada es 10% y desnutrición leve 27% de la muestra de pacientes tomada 469 pacientes existe una fuerte relación de todos los grados de desnutrición con la edad paterna y bajo nacimiento peso con alguna relación con el tipo de alimentación. Conclusiones: si bien la incidencia de desnutrición aguda severa ha disminuido en los últimos años en el hospital universitario de Karbala, existe un marcado aumento en la incidencia de desnutrición aguda moderada y desnutrición leve con su impacto en la salud pediátrica general en cuanto a morbilidad y mortalidad se deben tomar esfuerzos para manejar la desnutrición aguda moderada y desnutrición leve ofreciendo asesoramiento y apoyo nutricional especialmente en personas que no son Empleadores gubernamentales.
Background: Malnutrition is a major health problem in pediatrics age group contribute to increase mortality and morbidity of admitted patients. Patients and method: A descriptive randomized cross sectional study of 2965 cases between 6 -60 months from which 500 cases had malnutrition from15th of November 2019 to 31st of January 2020 hospital-based data to evaluate incidence of sever acute malnutrition and moderate acute malnutrition and mild malnutrition and its relation to some sociodemographic factors (paternal job, birth weight, type of feeding, age, sex). Results: the incidence of severe acute Malnutrition is 1%, the incidence of moderate acute malnutrition is 10% and mild malnutrition 27% from the sample of patients taken 469 patients there is a strong relationship of all degree of malnutrition to paternal age and low birth weight with some relation to type of feeding. Conclusions: while the incidence of severe acute malnutrition has been decreased last years In Karbala teaching hospital, there is marked increase in incidence of moderate acute malnutrition and mild malnutrition with their impact on general pediatric health regarding morbidity and mortality efforts should be taken to manage the moderate acute malnutrition and mild malnutrition by offering nutritional advice and support especially in people who are not governmental Employer.
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Child, Preschool , Socioeconomic Factors , Demography/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Incidence , Cross-Sectional Studies/statistics & numerical data , Morbidity , Malnutrition/etiology , Malnutrition/mortalityABSTRACT
Venezuela ha pasado a ser un país asimétrico, con grandes desigualdades y la inseguridad alimentaria familiar constituye quizás el problema nutricional más importante. En 1996, se comenzó a implementar la "Agenda Venezuela", la cual tiene un componente de protección social, que incluye 14 programas, para compensar a los grupos de población más desfavorecidos por las medidas económicas. Objetivo. Describir y analizar las fortalezas y debilidades de los programas de la Agenda, más vinculados con la situación nutricional. Materiales y métodos. Se basó en el análisis de informes presentados por los organismos ejecutores, de una encuesta de opinión realizada en Caracas, además de entrevistas a coordinadores de los programas. Se examinaron los programas: alimentos estratégicos, subsidio familiar, alimentación escolar, merienda y comedores escolares, hogares y multihogares de cuidado diario. Resultados. Las debilidades más comunes son: deficiente evaluación y apoyo educativo, escasa cobertura, solapamiento de beneficiarios, problemas de tipo logístico y presupuestario. A pesar de la fuerte inversión de recursos, el déficit nutricional en menores de seis años presenta una tendencia ascendente, lo cual reitera que los problemas nutricionales son multicausales y requieren de políticas sociales integrada, estables en el tiempo y focalizadas en los grupos más vulnerables. Conclusiones. Esta situación obliga a replantearse los programas en función a la pertinencia, factibilidad, costo-eficiencia e impacto y ha reiterado, la necesidad de un proceso de descentralización para otorgar más responsabilidad y poder de decisión a los gobiernos estatales, municipales y a la comunidad organizada y lograr un mayor impacto en la población objetivo y su contexto(AU)
Venezuela has become an asymmetric country, with great inequalities and family food insecurity is perhaps the most important nutritional problem. In 1996, the "Venezuela Agenda" began to be implemented, which has a social protection component, which includes 14 programs, to compensate the most disadvantaged population groups for economic measures. Objective. Describe and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the Agenda programs, more linked to the nutritional situation. Materials and methods. It was based on the analysis of reports submitted by the executing agencies, an opinion poll conducted in Caracas, as well as interviews with program coordinators. The programs were examined: strategic food, family subsidy, school feeding, snack and school canteens, daily care homes and multi-homes. Results. The most common weaknesses are poor evaluation and educational support, poor coverage, overlapping beneficiaries, logistical and budgetary problems. Despite the strong investment of resources, the nutritional deficit in children under six years of age shows an upward trend, which reiterates that nutritional problems have multiple causes and require integrated social policies, stable over time and focused on the most vulnerable groups. Conclusions. This situation forces us to reconsider the programs based on their relevance, feasibility, cost-efficiency and impact and has reiterated the need for a decentralization process to grant more responsibility and decision-making power to state and municipal governments and to the organized community and achieve a greater impact on the target population and its context(AU)
Subject(s)
Socioeconomic Factors , Risk Groups , Malnutrition/mortality , Food Insecurity , Public Policy , Food and Nutritional Surveillance , Nutritional Status , Financing, GovernmentABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Nutritional risk (NR) screening is the first step of nutrition care process. Few data are available in literature about its prevalence, nor, to our knowledge, is a universally accepted reference method for the intensive care unit (ICU). OBJECTIVE: The aim for this systematic review was to summarize evidence regarding the prevalence of NR and the predictive validity of different tools applied for NR screening of critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched up to December 2019 using the subject headings related to critically ill patients and NR screening. The current systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42019129668). DATA EXTRACTION: Data on NR prevalence, predictive validity of nutritional screening tools, and interaction between caloric-protein balance and NR in outcome prediction were collected. DATA ANALYSIS: Results were summarized qualitatively in text and tables, considering the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: From 15 669 articles initially identified, 36 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, providing data from 8 nutritional screening tools: modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC; n = 26 studies) and Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002; n = 7 studies) were the most frequent; the NR prevalence was 55.9% (range, 16.0% to 99.5%). Nutritional risk was a predictor of 28-day and ICU mortality in 8 studies. Interactions between caloric-protein balance and NR on outcome prediction presented were scarcely tested and presented heterogeneous results (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of NR in patients in the ICU varies widely; a satisfactory predictive validity was observed, especially when mNUTRIC or NRS-2002 were applied.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units , Malnutrition , Mass Screening/methods , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , Critical Illness/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/mortality , Malnutrition/prevention & control , Prevalence , Prognosis , Protein-Energy Malnutrition/diagnosis , Protein-Energy Malnutrition/mortality , Protein-Energy Malnutrition/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: To verify the performance of Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS) in the evaluation of nutritional status and its relation with clinical outcomes. METHODS: Nutritional status was evaluated by MIS. The Mann Whitney and chi-square tests were used to compare the dependent variables MIS, death, and hospitalization. We used the forward stepwise multivariate regression model to evaluate the relationship between age, dialysis time, albumin, total iron binding capacity, C-reactive protein (CRP), and ferritin and the outcome variables. The Kaplan-Meier curve was constructed to evaluate the influence of MIS on survival in the two groups of patients, and log rank tests were used to ascertain the equality of survival distributions in these groups. ROC curves were fitted to measure the area under the curve and the significance of MIS in predicting mortality. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients on hemodialysis with a median age of 62 (48.5-72) took part in this study. The median total MIS was 9 (5.5-10). The MIS of 51% of the patients indicated they were malnourished. After 29 months' follow-up, 27.7% of the patients had died and survival was significantly lower in the high MIS group. The score from Part B of the MIS form and ferritin were higher for the patients who deceased during the follow-up period. Patients with an MIS >9 presented a significantly shorter survival time than those with an MIS ≤9. CONCLUSION: MIS is effective in evaluating the nutritional status of patients on hemodialysis and has a predictive capacity for negative clinical outcomes.
Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Inflammation/complications , Malnutrition/complications , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Brazil/epidemiology , C-Reactive Protein , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Malnutrition/mortality , Middle Aged , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Status , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Renal Dialysis/mortality , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Introduction: Older people are positioned within the context of public health and nutrition as a vulnerable group. The priorities of the attention programs focus on eating habits and monitoring their nutritional status to improve their vital prognosis. Objective: To estimate the cases of death due to malnutrition of the population over 65 years old in Colombia for 2014 to 2016 to contribute to the analysis and decision-making in health to improve the nutritional situation of this population. Materials and methods: A retrospective descriptive study was carried out analizing death certificates from 2014 to 2016, whose basic cause of death was nutritional deficiencies and anemias. Mortality rates were estimated by sex and department of residence, and distribution frequencies were built based on demographic variables. Results: There were 3,275 deaths due to malnutrition in Colombia for the elderly in the study period (0.5% of total deaths). The mortality rate varied between 5.4 and 108.3 per 100,000 older adults. The highest mortality occurred in those over 80 years of age, especially in men. Conclusion: Caloric protein malnutrition in older adults is the most frequent cause of death due to malnutrition, followed by nutritional anemias. The highest mortality occurs in the age group over 80 years of age and the Amazonas, Guainía and Vaupés departments have the highest rates for all age groups.
Introducción. En el contexto de la salud pública y la nutrición, las personas mayores se consideran un colectivo vulnerable. Los programas de atención en salud dan prioridad a los hábitos alimentarios y a la vigilancia del estado nutricional para mejorar su pronóstico vital. Objetivo. Estimar los casos de muerte por desnutrición de la población mayor de 65 años en Colombia entre el 2014 y el 2016, para contribuir al análisis y la toma de decisiones en salud encaminadas a mejorar la situación nutricional de esta población. Materiales y métodos. Se trata de un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo en el cual se analizaron los certificados de defunción de los años 2014 a 2016, cuya causa básica de muerte fuesen las deficiencias y anemias nutricionales. Se estimaron las tasas de mortalidad por sexo y departamento de residencia, y las frecuencias de distribución según las variables demográficas. Resultados. Las defunciones por desnutrición en Colombia para el adulto mayor en el periodo de estudio, fueron 3.275 (0,5 % del total de muertes). La tasa de mortalidad varió entre 5,4 y 108,3 por cada 100.000 adultos mayores. La mayor mortalidad se presentó en los mayores de 80 años, especialmente en hombres. Conclusión. La desnutrición proteico-calórica en los adultos mayores es la causa más frecuente de muerte por desnutrición, seguida de las anemias nutricionales. La mayor mortalidad se presentó en el grupo de edad de mayores de 80 años, y en los departamentos de Amazonas, Guainía y Vaupés, los cuales tienen las mayores tasas para todos los grupos de edad.
Subject(s)
Malnutrition/mortality , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/mortality , Cause of Death , Colombia/epidemiology , Death Certificates , Female , Humans , Male , Protein-Energy Malnutrition/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a concordância entre o escore NUTRIC modificado e o escore NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa na identificação de pacientes em risco nutricional e na predição da mortalidade entre pacientes críticos. Avaliou-se também o risco de óbito com agrupamento dos pacientes segundo o risco nutricional e a desnutrição detectada pela avaliação subjetiva global. Métodos: Estudo de coorte em pacientes admitidos em uma unidade de terapia intensiva. O risco nutricional foi avaliado por meio do escore NUTRIC modificado e uma versão do escore NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa. Aplicou-se avaliação subjetiva global para diagnóstico de desnutrição. Calculou-se a estatística de Kappa e construiu-se uma curva ROC considerando o NUTRIC modificado como referência. A validade preditiva foi avaliada considerando a mortalidade em 28 dias (na unidade de terapia intensiva e após a alta) como desfecho. Resultados: Estudaram-se 130 pacientes (63,05 ± 16,46 anos, 53,8% do sexo masculino). Segundo o NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa, 34,4% foram classificados como escore alto, enquanto 28,5% dos pacientes tiveram esta classificação com utilização do NUTRIC modificado. Segundo a avaliação subjetiva global, 48,1% dos pacientes estavam desnutridos. Observou-se concordância excelente entre o NUTRIC modificado e o NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa (Kappa = 0,88; p < 0,001). A área sob a curva ROC foi igual a 0,942 (0,881 - 1,000) para o NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa. O risco de óbito em 28 dias estava aumentado nos pacientes com escores elevados pelo NUTRIC modificado (HR = 1,827; IC95% 1,029 - 3,244; p = 0,040) e pelo NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa (HR = 2,685; IC95% 1,423 - 5,064; p = 0,002). Observou-se elevado risco de óbito nos pacientes com alto risco nutricional e desnutrição, independentemente da versão do NUTRIC aplicada. Conclusão: A concordância entre o escore NUTRIC modificado e o NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa foi excelente. Além disto, a combinação da avaliação com um escore NUTRIC mais avaliação subjetiva global pode aumentar a precisão para predição de mortalidade em pacientes críticos.
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the concordance between the modified NUTRIC and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein instruments in identifying nutritional risk patients and predicting mortality in critically ill patients. The risk of death in patient groups was also investigated according to nutritional risk and malnutrition detected by subjective global assessment. Methods: A cohort study of patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Nutritional risk was assessed by modified NUTRIC and a version of NUTRIC with C-reactive protein. Subjective global assessment was applied to diagnose malnutrition. Kappa statistics were calculated, and an ROC curve was constructed considering modified NUTRIC as a reference. The predictive validity was assessed considering mortality in 28 days (whether in the intensive care unit or after discharge) as the outcome. Results: A total of 130 patients were studied (63.05 ± 16.46 years, 53.8% males). According to NUTRIC with C-reactive protein, 34.4% were classified as having a high score, while 28.5% of patients had this classification with modified NUTRIC. According to SGA 48.1% of patients were malnourished. There was excellent agreement between modified NUTRIC and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein (Kappa = 0.88, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was equal to 0.942 (0.881 - 1.000) for NUTRIC with C-reactive protein. The risk of death within 28 days was increased in patients with high modified NUTRIC (HR = 1.827; 95%CI 1.029 - 3.244; p = 0.040) and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein (HR = 2.685; 95%CI 1.423 - 5.064; p = 0.002) scores. A high risk of death was observed in patients with high nutritional risk and malnutrition, independent of the version of the NUTRIC score applied. Conclusion: An excellent agreement between modified NUTRIC and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein was observed. In addition, combining NUTRIC and subjective global assessment may increase the accuracy of predicting mortality in critically ill patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Nutrition Assessment , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Nutritional Status , Reproducibility of Results , Cohort Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Critical Illness/mortality , Risk Assessment/methods , Malnutrition/mortality , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD) on haemodialysis (HD) have high morbidity and mortality rates, which are also due to the inherent risks associated with nephropathy. Non-adherence (NA) to the different demands of the treatment can have consequences for the outcome of patients undergoing HD; nevertheless, there are still doubts about such repercussions. This study was conducted to evaluate the association between NA to conventional HD and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated mortality in a 6-year period in a cohort of 255 patients on HD in northeast Brazil. The evaluated parameters of NA to HD were interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) ≥ 4% of dry weight (DW), hyperphosphatemia and regular attendance at treatment, assessed as the correlation between the periods on HD completed and those prescribed. We used the Cox multivariate regression model to analyse survival and the predictors of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: With a median follow-up period of 1493 days and a mortality rate of 9.1 per 100 people-years, there were 87 deaths, of which 54% were cardiovascular deaths. IDWG ≥4% of DW was associated with a risk of all-cause mortality however presenting a borderline outcome for cardiovascular mortality, with hazard ratios of 2.02 (CI 95% 1.17-3.49, p = 0.012) and 2.09 (CI 95% 1.01-4.35, p = 0.047), respectively. No significant association was found between other parameters of NA and mortality. Subgroup analysis showed that for patients with IDWG ≥4% of DW, malnutrition, age and diagnosis of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were associated with higher all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: IDWG ≥4% of DW was identified as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and demonstrated a borderline outcome for cardiovascular mortality in patients on conventional HD. The occurrence of excessive IDWG in the presence of malnutrition represented a significant increase in the risk of death, indicating a subgroup of patients with a worse prognosis.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Patient Compliance , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Weight Gain , Age Factors , Aged , Brazil , Cause of Death , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/mortality , Male , Malnutrition/mortality , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , Stroke/mortalityABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: la nutrición tiene importancia capital en la evolución de los pacientes ingresados. La prevalencia de malnutrición oscila entre 30% y 60% de los enfermos hospitalizados. Objetivo: evaluar impacto en la mortalidad y complicaciones a corto plazo de una intervención nutricional precoz. Material y método: se realizó un estudio caso control con todos los pacientes que ingresaron en la Unidad de Cuidados intensivos emergentes con el diagnóstico de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad asociada a desnutrición en Hospital Militar Dr. Carlos J. Finlay, de noviembre de 2017 hasta mayo del 2018. Resultados: la media de la edad del estudio fue de 80,73 ± 9,01 años. El 46 % fueron mujeres. La mortalidad global estuvo en el 26 %. El 69 % de los pacientes presento alguna complicación. Existió una mayor sobrevida en el grupo de estudio (7 fallecidos y 29 vivos), que en el grupo de control donde hubo 12 fallecidos y 24 vivos x2 = 0,18. En la tabla 2 se evidencia que existe diferencia entre los grupos según las complicaciones aparecidas. Fue marcada la diferencia entre los grupos en relación a la cantidad de pacientes con diarreas. La incidencia fue mayor tanto en el subgrupo de vivos(8) como en el de fallecidos(3) del grupo control. Por otro lado la hiperglucemia fue mucho mayor en el grupo de estudio(11) y sin embargo, no hubo impacto en la mortalidad x2 = 0,03. En la tabla 3 se evidencia una fuerte evidencia que relaciona al estado nutricional deficiente con una peor evolución. Entre los fallecidos solo 1 tenía un estado nutricional catalogado como desnutrido ligero, sin embargo entre los 22 fallecidos 14 presentaron desnutrición severa. Conclusiones: el estado nutricional al ingreso impacta negativamente en la mortalidad a corto plazo y la estrategia nutricional mixta precoz no reduce ese aspecto sin embargo si reduce el número de complicaciones aunque se asoció a mayor incidencia de hiperglucemia sin impactar en la mortalidad (AU).
SUMMARY Introduction: nutrition has a capital importance in the evolution of in-patients. Malnutrition prevalence ranges from 30 % to 60 % of the admitted patients. Objective: to evaluate the impact on mortality and the short time complications of the precocious nutritional intervention. Material and Method: a case control study was carried out with all patients who entered the Emergency Intensive Care Unit with the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia associated to malnutrition in the Military Hospital "Dr, Carlos J. Finlay" from November 2017 to May 2018. Results: the average age was 80.73 ± 9.01 years. 46 % were female patients. Global mortality was 26 %. 69 % of patients had complications. The group of study showed a higher survival (7 deads and 29 survivors) than the control one where there were 12 deads and 24 survivors (2=0.18). Table 2 shows that there are differences between groups according to the complications found. The difference between groups was remarkable in relation to the quantity of patients with diarrhea. The incidence was higher both in the group of survivors(8) and in the group of dead peoples(3) of the control group. On the other hand, hyperglycemia was much higher in the group of study(11) but without striking on mortality (2= 0.03). Table 3 shows strong evidence relating deficient nutritional status to a worth evolution. Among the deceased patients only 1 had a nutritional status classified as slightly malnutrition, but among the 22 deceased, 14 had severe malnutrition. Conclusions: the nutritional status at admission negatively strikes on short term mortality, and mixed precocious nutritional strategy does not reduce that aspect. However it does reduce the number of complications, though it was associated to a higher incidence of hyperglycemia without striking on mortality (AU).
Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Pneumonia/complications , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Early Medical Intervention , Pneumonia/mortality , Nutrition Programs , Malnutrition/etiology , Malnutrition/mortality , Malnutrition/therapyABSTRACT
Malnutrition is associated with morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Thus, it is essential to apply reliable indicators to assess the nutritional status of these individuals. Objective: To evaluate the thickness of the adductor pollicis muscle (APM) in patients with HF as an indicator of somatic protein status and correlate the obtained values with conventionally used parameters and electrical bioimpedance (EBI) markers. Methods: Cross-sectional study with patients with HF undergoing regular outpatient treatment. APM thickness was measured in the dominant arm, and the values obtained were classified according to gender and age. The anthropometric parameters assessed included the body mass index (BMI) and specific parameters to assess the muscle (arm muscle circumference [AMC] and arm muscle area [AMA]). Values of phase angle (PA), standard PA (SPA), and lean mass were obtained by EBI. Statistical analyses were performed with the software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 19, using unpaired Student's t, Mann-Whitney, or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests for comparisons between groups, as appropriate. The correlation between variables of interest was performed using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, as adequate. The level of significance was set at 5%. Results: About 70% of the 74 patients evaluated were classified as malnourished according to the APM thickness. Values of AMC, AMA, and lean mass correlated positively with APM thickness (p < 0.005). The APM thickness also correlated positively with PA and SPA (r = 0.49, p < 0.001 and r = 0.31, p = 0.008, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with HF presented a high frequency of protein malnutrition when APM thickness was used as an indicator of nutritional status. APM thickness values correlated with conventional measures of somatic protein evaluation and may be related to the prognosis of these patients, since they correlated positively with PA and SPA
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Nutrition Assessment , Malnutrition/mortality , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Thumb , Body Mass Index , Sex Factors , Anthropometry , Chronic Disease , Cross-Sectional Studies/methods , Analysis of Variance , Age Factors , InflammationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Background: malnutrition is a common problem in hospitalized patients, being associated with increased morbidity, mortality and costs. Multiple factors contribute to a deficient nutritional status, making malnutrition the cause or consequence of severe diseases. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a minimally invasive procedure indicated for long-term administration of enteral nutrition in patients with limited ability for oral intake who have an intact, functional gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to determine the profile of patients undergoing PEG in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. Methods: single-center retrospective study of all patients who underwent PEG from January 1st to December 31st, 2016, in a private tertiary hospital located in southern Brazil. Data were collected retrospectively from the patients' medical records, including nutritional status, indications, complications and outcomes. Results: one hundred and thirty-three patients underwent PEG at our institution and were eligible for inclusion in the study. Median patient age was 82 years, and 57.9% were females. The main indication for PEG was dementia syndrome, followed by stroke. As much as 68.4% were diagnosed as severely malnourished and 23.0% had procedure-related complications. Conclusions: PEG tubes are being increasingly used for enteral nutrition in patients with dysphagia or inability to maintain adequate nutritional intake. The findings of the present study highlight the importance of regular nutritional risk screening by a multidisciplinary team, paying special attention to the patient's nutritional status and conditions that may place the patient at risk of developing dysphagia, with the implementation of measures to minimize malnutrition in hospitalized patients.
INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la desnutrición es común en pacientes hospitalizados y se está convirtiendo en causa o consecuencia de enfermedades graves, asociándose a morbilidad, mortalidad y costos aumentados. Múltiples factores contribuyen a un estado nutricional deficiente. La gastrostomía endoscópica percutánea (PEG) es un procedimiento mínimamente invasivo para la administración de nutrición enteral en pacientes con capacidad limitada de ingesta oral que tengan el tracto gastrointestinal intacto y funcional. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar el perfil de pacientes sometidos a PEG en un hospital terciario del sur de Brasil. Métodos: estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico de todos los pacientes sometidos a PEG del 1 de enero al 31 de diciembre de 2016 en un hospital terciario privado del sur de Brasil. Se recolectaron los datos retrospectivamente en los registros médicos, incluyendo estado nutricional, indicaciones, complicaciones y evolución. Resultados: ciento treinta y tres pacientes se sometieron a PEG en nuestra institución y fueron elegibles para el estudio. La edad mediana fue de 82 años y el 57,9% eran mujeres. Las principales indicaciones para PEG fueron demencia y accidente cerebrovascular. El 68,4% fueron diagnosticados con desnutrición grave y el 23,0% presentaron complicaciones relacionadas al procedimiento. Conclusiones: se utilizan cada vez más tubos de PEG para nutrición enteral en pacientes disfágicos o incapaces de mantener una ingesta nutricional adecuada. Nuestros hallazgos señalan la importancia del cribado para riesgo nutricional por un equipo multidisciplinario, con atención especial al estado nutricional del paciente y a condiciones que pueden ponerlo en riesgo para disfagia y la implementación de medidas para minimizar la desnutrición.
Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/mortality , Gastrostomy/mortality , Nutrition Assessment , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brazil/epidemiology , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Malnutrition/complications , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Malnutrition/mortality , Nutritional Status , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between the modified NUTRIC and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein instruments in identifying nutritional risk patients and predicting mortality in critically ill patients. The risk of death in patient groups was also investigated according to nutritional risk and malnutrition detected by subjective global assessment. METHODS: A cohort study of patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Nutritional risk was assessed by modified NUTRIC and a version of NUTRIC with C-reactive protein. Subjective global assessment was applied to diagnose malnutrition. Kappa statistics were calculated, and an ROC curve was constructed considering modified NUTRIC as a reference. The predictive validity was assessed considering mortality in 28 days (whether in the intensive care unit or after discharge) as the outcome. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were studied (63.05 ± 16.46 years, 53.8% males). According to NUTRIC with C-reactive protein, 34.4% were classified as having a high score, while 28.5% of patients had this classification with modified NUTRIC. According to SGA 48.1% of patients were malnourished. There was excellent agreement between modified NUTRIC and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein (Kappa = 0.88, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was equal to 0.942 (0.881 - 1.000) for NUTRIC with C-reactive protein. The risk of death within 28 days was increased in patients with high modified NUTRIC (HR = 1.827; 95%CI 1.029 - 3.244; p = 0.040) and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein (HR = 2.685; 95%CI 1.423 - 5.064; p = 0.002) scores. A high risk of death was observed in patients with high nutritional risk and malnutrition, independent of the version of the NUTRIC score applied. CONCLUSION: An excellent agreement between modified NUTRIC and NUTRIC with C-reactive protein was observed. In addition, combining NUTRIC and subjective global assessment may increase the accuracy of predicting mortality in critically ill patients.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar a concordância entre o escore NUTRIC modificado e o escore NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa na identificação de pacientes em risco nutricional e na predição da mortalidade entre pacientes críticos. Avaliou-se também o risco de óbito com agrupamento dos pacientes segundo o risco nutricional e a desnutrição detectada pela avaliação subjetiva global. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte em pacientes admitidos em uma unidade de terapia intensiva. O risco nutricional foi avaliado por meio do escore NUTRIC modificado e uma versão do escore NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa. Aplicou-se avaliação subjetiva global para diagnóstico de desnutrição. Calculou-se a estatística de Kappa e construiu-se uma curva ROC considerando o NUTRIC modificado como referência. A validade preditiva foi avaliada considerando a mortalidade em 28 dias (na unidade de terapia intensiva e após a alta) como desfecho. RESULTADOS: Estudaram-se 130 pacientes (63,05 ± 16,46 anos, 53,8% do sexo masculino). Segundo o NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa, 34,4% foram classificados como escore alto, enquanto 28,5% dos pacientes tiveram esta classificação com utilização do NUTRIC modificado. Segundo a avaliação subjetiva global, 48,1% dos pacientes estavam desnutridos. Observou-se concordância excelente entre o NUTRIC modificado e o NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa (Kappa = 0,88; p < 0,001). A área sob a curva ROC foi igual a 0,942 (0,881 - 1,000) para o NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa. O risco de óbito em 28 dias estava aumentado nos pacientes com escores elevados pelo NUTRIC modificado (HR = 1,827; IC95% 1,029 - 3,244; p = 0,040) e pelo NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa (HR = 2,685; IC95% 1,423 - 5,064; p = 0,002). Observou-se elevado risco de óbito nos pacientes com alto risco nutricional e desnutrição, independentemente da versão do NUTRIC aplicada. CONCLUSÃO: A concordância entre o escore NUTRIC modificado e o NUTRIC com proteína C-reativa foi excelente. Além disto, a combinação da avaliação com um escore NUTRIC mais avaliação subjetiva global pode aumentar a precisão para predição de mortalidade em pacientes críticos.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness/mortality , Intensive Care Units , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Nutrition Assessment , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Malnutrition/mortality , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between sarcopenia, diagnosed by different muscle mass measurement techniques, with nutritional status and overall survival in patients with advanced cancer under palliative care. AIM: To investigate the association of sarcopenia, according to distinct muscle mass measurement methods, with nutritional status and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This observational and prospective study, including 334 patients, defined sarcopenia as reduced muscle mass and strength. Muscle mass was evaluated adopting 3 different methods, mid-upper arm muscle area (MUAMA), calf circumference (CC) and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMI) described by Baumgartner (1998) and adjusted for height. Strength was defined using a handgrip dynamometer and OS was established based on a 90 days follow-up after inclusion date. Kaplan-Meier curves were conducted for survival analyzes and the association between sarcopenia and OS was evaluated by Cox regression model RESULTS: Prevalence of sarcopenia varied from 27-65% according to the method used to evaluate muscle mass. Malnutrition assessed by different parameters was significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia. Patients considered sarcopenic by MUAMA (43 versus 67 days, p<0.001), CC (44 versus 77 days, p<0.001) and ASMI (48 versus 75 days, p<0.001) had significantly lower OS compared to non-sarcopenic patients. Sarcopenia evaluated by MUAMA (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.12-2.18) and CC (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.45-2.76) showed a higher risk of mortality. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia diagnosed by MUAMA and CC could predict mortality and CC proved to be the best prognostic method for estimating OS in patients with advanced cancer in palliative care.
Subject(s)
Anthropometry/methods , Neoplasms/mortality , Nutritional Status , Sarcopenia/diagnosis , Sarcopenia/mortality , Aged , Arm/physiopathology , Female , Hand Strength , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leg/physiopathology , Male , Malnutrition/etiology , Malnutrition/mortality , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Sarcopenia/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are many nutrition screening tools currently being applied in hospitals to identify risk of malnutrition. However, multivariate statistical models are not usually employed to take into account the importance of each variable included in the instrument's development. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the concurrent and predictive validities of a new screening tool of nutrition risk. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was developed, in which 4 nutrition screening tools were applied to all patients. Length of stay in hospital and mortality were considered to test the predictive validity, and the concurrent validity was tested by comparing the Nuritional Risk in Emergency (NRE)-2017 to the other tools. RESULTS: A total of 748 patients were included. The final NRE-2017 score was composed of 6 questions (advanced age, metabolic stress of the disease, decreased appetite, changing of food consistency, unintentional weight loss, and muscle mass loss) with answers yes or no. The prevalence of nutrition risk was 50.7% and 38.8% considering the cutoff points 1.0 and 1.5, respectively. The NRE-2017 showed a satisfactory power to indentify risk of malnutrition (area under the curve >0.790 for all analyses). According to the NRE-2017, patients at risk of malnutrition have twice as high relative risk of a very long hospital stay. The hazard ratio for mortality was 2.78 (1.03-7.49) when the cutoff adopted by the NRE-2017 was 1.5 points. CONCLUSION: NRE-2017 is a new, easy-to-apply nutrition screening tool which uses 6 bi-categoric features to detect the risk of malnutrition, and it presented a good concurrent and predictive validity.