ABSTRACT
When a patient with acute psychosis refuses antipsychotic medication despite a clear need for treatment, involuntary medication is often considered. When the patient is both pregnant and acutely unwell, an additional layer of analysis enters the picture. This analysis then also includes the health of the mother and fetus, rights of the mother and fetus, and whose rights take precedence when choosing treatment options in event of a conflict. Antipsychotic agents are frequently the medications prescribed as involuntary treatment. Typical and atypical antipsychotic agents are often used in both emergent and nonemergent situations during pregnancy. Despite a lack of randomized, double-blind, controlled, prospective studies in pregnancy, available data regarding the safety of antipsychotic agents in pregnancy are relatively reassuring. At the same time, the risks of untreated psychosis, for both the mother and the fetus, are not negligible. Such cases merit ethics-related and legal analyses. Forensic psychiatrists involved in such cases need to consider the patient's capacity to make medical decisions and be able to discuss the potential risks, benefits, and alternatives with patients and in court, as part of initiation of involuntary treatment.
Subject(s)
Involuntary Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Personal Autonomy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Involuntary Treatment/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Young AdultSubject(s)
Maternal Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Health Services/organization & administration , Maternal Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal-Child Health Centers/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal-Child Health Centers/organization & administration , Occupational Stress/prevention & control , Female , Germany , Health Plan Implementation/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Humans , Infant, Newborn , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Programs/organization & administration , PregnancySubject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Government Agencies/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Pregnancy , United KingdomABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are lay midwives worldwide, interchangeably and universally called traditional birth attendants or traditional midwives by organisations such as the World Health Organization and the International Confederation of Midwives. AIM: This study aimed to explore the history of lay midwives (village midwives) in Brunei, describe the evolution from their previous to current roles and determine if they are still needed by women today. METHODS: This qualitative, descriptive study included in-depth, semi-structured interviews with eight women who had received care from village midwives. Data analysis was based on the principles underpinning thematic analysis and used a constant comparative method. FINDINGS: Village midwives have been popular in Brunei since the 1900s, with their major role being to assist women with childbirth. However, since the 1960s, their roles and practices have changed to focus on pre-conception, antenatal, postnatal and women's general healthcare. Traditional practices were influenced by religion, culture and the social context of and within Brunei. DISCUSSION: The major changes in village midwives' roles and practices resulted from the enforcement of the Brunei Midwives' Act in 1956. Village midwives' traditional practices became juxtaposed with modern complementary alternative medicine practices, and they began charging a fee for their services. CONCLUSION: Brunei village midwives are trusted by women, and their practices may still be widely accepted in Brunei. Further research is necessary to confirm their existence, determine the detailed scope and appropriateness of their practices and verify the feasibility of them working together with healthcare professionals.
Subject(s)
Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Home Childbirth , Midwifery , Nurse Midwives , Prenatal Care , Brunei , Female , Home Childbirth/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional Practice/organization & administration , Qualitative Research , Rural Population , Women/psychology , WorkforceABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Maternal Welfare/trends , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Maternal and Child Health , Maternal Welfare/ethics , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , /legislation & jurisprudence , /methods , Social Welfare/legislation & jurisprudenceSubject(s)
Maternal Health Services/trends , Maternal Welfare/trends , Midwifery/trends , Female , Health Care Reform/trends , Humans , Maternal Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Safety , Pregnancy , State Medicine , United KingdomSubject(s)
Maternal Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Mental Competency/legislation & jurisprudence , Personal Autonomy , Pregnancy Complications , Female , Humans , Mental Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , United KingdomABSTRACT
Las Unidades de Saudé Familiar (USF) suponen un modelo de Atención Primaria desconocido para muchos. Nacidas dentro de la reforma del sistema nacional sanitario portugués, surgen ante la necesidad de proporcionar unos cuidados de salud de calidad a los ciudadanos, mejorando la satisfacción tanto de los propios usuarios como de los profesionales que trabajan en ella. En este artículo trataremos de explicar el funcionamiento de estas USF gracias a la oportunidad que tuvimos los autores del mismo de compartir consulta en la USF de Sao Juliao-Oeiras (AU)
Unidades de Saude Familiar (USF) represent a model of primary care unknown to many people. Born within the reform of the Portuguese national health system, they arise from the need to provide a quality health care to citizens, improving the satisfaction of both users and professionals who work in it. This article will try to explain the working of these USF thanks to the opportunity to share medical consultation that the authors had at the USF-Oeiras Sao Juliao (AU)
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Family Practice/methods , Family Practice/organization & administration , Hospital Units/organization & administration , Hospital Units/standards , Family Health/standards , Family Health/trends , Family Development Planning , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/standards , /methods , /trends , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/standards , Spain/epidemiology , Portugal/epidemiology , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/trendsSubject(s)
Premature Birth/prevention & control , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , United KingdomSubject(s)
Infant Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Midwifery/organization & administration , Postnatal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Infant Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Nurse's Role , Postnatal Care/methods , Pregnancy , VictoriaSubject(s)
Cesarean Section/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Mentally Ill Persons/legislation & jurisprudence , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Obstetric Labor Complications/surgery , Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women/psychology , United KingdomABSTRACT
Court-ordered caesarean sections are in the news after a number of recent legal decisions authorising surgery for women who lack mental capacity to consent. The decisions have not always been based on good evidence and they raise serious concerns about the protection of the rights of mentally ill women. The authors explain the legal process and question the wisdom of recent judgements.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Mental Competency/legislation & jurisprudence , Mentally Ill Persons/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom , Women's Rights/legislation & jurisprudenceSubject(s)
Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Referral and Consultation/legislation & jurisprudence , Socioeconomic Factors , United StatesSubject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Liability/legislation & jurisprudence , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Nursing, Private Duty/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Professional Autonomy , State Medicine , United KingdomSubject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/legislation & jurisprudence , Freedom , Health Promotion/legislation & jurisprudence , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Natural Childbirth/legislation & jurisprudence , Decision Making , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Female , Health Promotion/methods , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Hungary , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Natural Childbirth/nursing , Patient AdvocacySubject(s)
Job Description , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Midwifery/legislation & jurisprudence , Natural Childbirth/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional Autonomy , Social Perception , Female , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Natural Childbirth/nursing , Pregnancy , United StatesABSTRACT
Health insurance in the United States is a patchwork system whereby opportunities for coverage are strongly associated with life circumstances (ie, age, income, pregnancy, parental status). For pregnant women, this situation contributes to unstable coverage before, between, and after pregnancies. The Affordable Care Act has the potential to make coverage for women of reproductive age more stable and create new opportunities to intervene on conditions associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity. In this article, we discuss the health economics of the Affordable Care Act, its implications for maternal and neonatal health, specific challenges associated with implementation, and opportunities for obstetricians to leverage the Affordable Care Act to improve the care of women.
Subject(s)
Infant Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Coverage/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Female , Gynecology/economics , Gynecology/trends , Humans , Infant Welfare/economics , Infant, Newborn , Insurance Coverage/economics , Insurance Coverage/trends , Maternal Welfare/economics , Obstetrics/economics , Obstetrics/trends , Pregnancy , Reproductive Health/economics , Reproductive Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Health/trendsABSTRACT
In September 2013, Congress again will review the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009. Fourteen states cover the fetus only (and not the pregnant woman) under the "unborn child" provision of the current law. That the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act continues to make it possible for states to provide health insurance coverage to the fetus only has been critiqued for unnecessarily politicizing the law, dragging abortion and personhood debates into the matter of children's health insurance and creating unacceptable tensions between maternal and fetal health. Although the 2009 reauthorization attempted to remedy this issue by also providing coverage for the pregnant mother, it is imperative to review these changes and their effect before the 2013 reauthorization. To ensure optimum health care for both the fetus and the woman, we urge for removal of the "unborn child" pathway and promote coverage of both the fetus and the pregnant woman.