Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 861
Filter
1.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 30(9): 677-684, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39222495

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Maxillofacial injuries, due to their diverse etiological causes, are often considered a component of multi-trauma and constitute a significant portion of trauma. This study aims to elucidate the incidence of maxillofacial traumas, particularly among military personnel, various clinical courses, and characteristics, thereby contributing to the literature. METHODS: Forensic reports, primarily related to military personnel and organized between 2011 and 2016 at the Forensic Medicine Department of Gülhane Medical Faculty, Health Sciences University, were retrospectively examined. The study involved a detailed analysis of cases with maxillofacial injuries resulting from trauma, focusing on aspects such as age, gender, the origin of the trauma, degree of injury, the presence of bone and dental fractures, and the occurrence of psychiatric disorders as a result of the trauma. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that maxillofacial traumas predominantly occurred in young male individuals, particularly among military personnel. The most common etiological factor identified was interpersonal violence. The majority of injuries were soft tissue damages, with the nasal bone being the most frequently fractured area. Injuries to the head and upper extremities were also detected in some of the cases, showing that multiple injuries are common in such cases. Post-traumatic psychological disorders developed in some cases, with anxiety disorders being the most commonly observed. CONCLUSION: It has been determined that maxillofacial injuries can affect multiple body regions, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach. This study underscores the importance of developing comprehensive strategies and policies for understanding and managing maxillofacial traumas, providing a fundamental reference for future studies in this field.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Turkey/epidemiology , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Forensic Medicine , Aged
2.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(8): 1511-1513, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160723

ABSTRACT

In addition to the clinical burden of trauma, the financial burden is an important aspect of care globally, especially for patients in low- and middle-income countries. The current retrospective review was done of data from January 2015 to December 2020 related to patients of oral maxillofacial trauma management in a tertiary care setting. Analysis of variance was used to determine the mean difference in the cost incurred depending upon the type of trauma and the number of bone plates used in fracture management. Pearson correlation was applied to explore any correlation involving patient age, aetiology and type of fracture, number of bone plates employed and the length of stay in the hospital. No statistically significant differences were noted in the cost among the different groups. The cost of care was significantly (p<0.001) correlated to the length of stay. Other variables, such as the type of fractures and the number of plates, had no significant impact (p>0.05).


Subject(s)
Length of Stay , Maxillofacial Injuries , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Pakistan , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/economics , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Maxillofacial Injuries/economics , Maxillofacial Injuries/therapy , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Young Adult , Adolescent , Bone Plates/economics , Mandibular Fractures/economics , Mandibular Fractures/therapy , Mandibular Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/economics , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Aged , Child , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Maxillary Fractures/economics , Maxillary Fractures/surgery , Maxillary Fractures/therapy
3.
Indian J Med Ethics ; IX(3): 215-216, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39183614

ABSTRACT

In India, 21.20% of annual road traffic accidents (RTA) result in maxillofacial injuries, with most victims being young adults aged 18-45 years. Such RTAs cause personal losses to individuals and families and adversely impact the country's health system facilities. These losses result from the expenses for medical care, lost wages for individuals who are rendered unable to work, and lost productivity for family members who must miss work or school in order to care for the injured. Most nations lose 3% of their gross domestic product to road accidents. RTA injuries, often associated with severe morbidity, cause functional impairments and have immense psychological impact. Rehabilitating these patients and their future treatment needs constitute an economic burden to themselves and their families, more so in a developing country like India, where a majority of the population cannot afford the treatment costs and lack health insurance coverage. These injuries therefore, as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2001, fall within the ambit of impairment and disability. However, Indian law does not identify maxillofacial injuries and the ensuing trauma as disabilities. Addressing this could be an important step towards improvement in the care and compensation provided to survivors of such life changing accidents.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Disabled Persons , Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , Accidents, Traffic/economics , India , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/therapy , Adult , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Male , Disability Evaluation
4.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 20221, 2024 08 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39215002

ABSTRACT

The safety of children's living environment is affected by several factors. Safer living environments have been offered as one explanation to decreases in children's fractures. Earlier studies provide evidence of a decreasing trend in children's fractures in the past decades. The objective of this study was to investigate demographic and clinical features of paediatric maxillofacial fractures during three time periods. A retrospective cross-sectional single-centre study was designed. The study included 474 patients aged ≤ 15 years admitted to Helsinki University Hospital in Finland with maxillofacial fractures during 1980-1989, 1993-2002 and 2013-2018. Maxillofacial fractures increased by 25% during the study period. The increase was greater in boys (28%) than in girls (19%), and significant in age groups 0-5 years (71%) and 13-15 years (32%). Exclusively mandibular fractures decreased by 20%, while exclusively midfacial fractures increased more than four-fold and exclusively upper-third fractures five-fold. Being hit by object and falls from height increased more than two-fold. A temporary increase in assaults and decrease in bicycle accidents in the middle period of the study was observed. During the three decades, paediatric maxillofacial fractures have increased and both fracture type and underlying aetiology have changed. These findings reflect improvements in diagnostics, traffic safety, regulations and technology. The role of factors such as interpersonal violence and economic fluctuation on the incidence of childhood maxillofacial fractures is discussed.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , Male , Female , Child , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Infant , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Finland/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Infant, Newborn , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data
5.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 121, 2024 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39020294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The percentage of elderly trauma patients under anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents has been rising lately. As newer agents are introduced, each comes with its own advantages and precautions. Our study covered elderly patients admitted to the ED with maxillofacial trauma while on anticoagulation (AC) or antiplatelet therapy (APT). We aimed to investigate the demographic characteristics, causes, and types of maxillofacial trauma, along with concomitant injuries, duration of hospitalisation, haemorrhagic complications, and the overall costs of care in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Data were gathered from the ED of Bern University Hospital. In this retrospective analysis, patients over 65 of age were included, who presented at our ED with maxillofacial trauma between 2013 and 2019 while undergoing treatment with therapeutic AC/APT. RESULTS: The study involved 188 patients with a median age of 81 years (IQR: 81 [74; 87]), of whom 55.3% (n=104) were male. More than half (54.8%, n=103) were aged 80 years or older. Cardiovascular diseases were present in 69.7% (n=131) of the patients, with the most common indications for AC/APT use being previous thromboembolic events (41.5%, n=78) and atrial fibrillation (25.5%, n=48). The predominant cause of facial injury was falls, accounting for 83.5% (n=157) of cases, followed by bicycle accidents (6.9%, n=13) and road-traffic accidents (5.3%, n=10). The most common primary injuries were fractures of the orbital floor and/or medial/lateral wall (60.1%, n=113), zygomatic bone (30.3%, n=57), followed by isolated orbital floor fractures (23.4%, n=44) and nasal bone fractures (19.1%, n=36). Fractures of the mandible occurred in 14.9% (n=28). Facial hematomas occurred in 68.6% of patients (129 cases), primarily in the midface area. Relevant facial bleeding complications were intracerebral haemorrhage being the most frequent (28.2%, n=53), followed by epistaxis (12.2%, n=23) and retrobulbar/intraorbital hematoma (9%, n=17). Sixteen patients (8.5%) experienced heavy bleeding that required emergency treatment. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.1% (4 cases). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that falls are the leading cause of maxillofacial trauma in the elderly, with the most common diagnoses being orbital, zygomatic, and nasal fractures. Haemorrhagic complications primarily involve facial hematomas, especially in the middle third of the face, with intracerebral haemorrhage being the second most frequent. Surgical intervention for bleeding was required in 8.5% of cases. Given the aging population, it is essential to improve prevention strategies and update safety protocols, particularly for patients on anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy (AC/APT). This can ensure rapid diagnostic imaging and prompt treatment in emergencies.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Aged, 80 and over , Aged , Switzerland/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects
6.
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 42(3): 340-345, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English, Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39049654

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze the clinical epidemiology, diagnostic and treatment characteristics of minor patients with maxillofacial fracture and provide a reference for the prevention and treatment. METHODS: The clinical data of minor patients with maxillofacial fracture in Departmentof Traumatic and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020 were retrospectively studied and statistically analyzed in terms of age, gender, etiology, anatomic sites and treatment modalities. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was (10.65±5.15) years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1.91∶1. High fall was the primary cause of maxillofacial fractures in minors aged 0-6 years. Traffic accident injuries were the main cause of maxillofacial fractures in minors aged 7-12 and 13-17 years. About 65.13% of the midface and 83.08% non-condylar fractures were mainly treated by surgery, and condylar fractures were treated conservatively in 74.73% and by surgical treatment in 25.27%. CONCLUSIONS: The etiology of maxillofacial fractures in minors differs at different ages, so prevention strategies should be adjusted according to age. Surgical treatment has become the preferred treatment modality for midface and non-condylar fractures. Conservative treatment is still the main treatment method for condylar fractures, but the proportion of surgical treatment increases.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Accidents, Traffic , China/epidemiology , Infant , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Minors
7.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 95: 161-169, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924894

ABSTRACT

Similar to other developing countries, the elderly population has increased in Türkiye in the last 30 years. Due to this increase, there has been a rise in the number of elderly patients suffering from maxillofacial injuries. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the data of patients with geriatric facial trauma treated in our trauma center between 2010 and 2022 and the leading types of injuries, their causes, accompanying findings, and preferred treatment methods according to sex and age. In the study, the demographic characteristics, including age, sex, comorbidities, causes and sites of injury, treatment options, accompanying injuries, and facial injury severity scores of 292 patients were analyzed. Among more than 4000 patients undergoing treatment for maxillofacial injuries screened from January 2010 to August 2022, 292 (166 males, 56%; age range, 65-98 years) fulfilled the eligibility criteria for the study, of whom 60 had a surgical operation. Falls were the most typical cause of injury (70.20%), followed by motor vehicle accidents (18.15%) and assaults (7.87%). Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures were the most frequently encountered fracture type (n=126, 29.92%), followed by nose fractures (n=122), orbital fractures (n=85), and mandible fractures (n=72). It was observed that the fractures were managed by surgical intervention or conservative measures and that conservative treatment was mostly preferred at an increasing rate with advancing age. As the elderly population increases, so does the incidence of geriatric facial trauma. Due to increased age, deterioration of health, and increase in the number of comorbidities, surgical interventions are less preferred.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , Male , Aged , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/therapy , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Injury Severity Score , Age Factors
8.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 13202, 2024 06 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851787

ABSTRACT

Oral and maxillofacial trauma is influenced by various factors, including regional characteristics and social background. Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a state of emergency was declared in Japan in March 2020. In this study, we aimed to examine the dynamics of patients with oral and maxillofacial trauma over a 12-years period using interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis. Patients were examined at the Shimane University Hospital, Maxillofacial Trauma Center from April 2012 to April 2023. In addition to general patient characteristics, data regarding the type of trauma and its treatment were obtained from 1203 patients (770 men and 433 women). Group comparisons showed significant differences in age, trauma status, method of treatment, referral source, route, and injury occasion. ITS analysis indicated significant changes in combined nasal fractures, non-invasive reduction, and sports injuries (P < 0.05), suggesting COVID-19 significantly impacted oral and maxillofacial trauma dynamics. A pandemic of an infectious disease may decrease the number of minor trauma cases but increase the number of injuries from outdoor activities, resulting in no overall change in the dynamics of the number of trauma patients. Medical systems for oral and maxillofacial trauma should be in place at all times, independent of infectious disease pandemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Japan/epidemiology , Pandemics , Young Adult , Adolescent , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Child , Aged, 80 and over
9.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(5): 543-547, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582675

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and patterns of maxillofacial fractures and the demographic characteristics of associated head and neck injuries. This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) in Irbid, northern Jordan. The data was obtained from the electronic clinical records of all patients in whom maxillofacial fractures and associated head and neck injuries were confirmed. During the five-year period captured by this retrospective study, 481 patients with 1026 maxillofacial fractures (equivalent to 2.13 fractures per patient) were treated. The sample comprised of 369 (76.7%) males and 112 (23.3%) females, resulting in a male/female ratio of 3.3:1. Majority of the patients were in the 21-30 age group and RTA was the most common cause of maxillofacial fractures, accounting for 299 (62.1%) of the analyzed cases. In 316 cases, maxillary fractures were accompanied by associated injuries, 132 (41.77%) of which were intracranial lesions, 80 (25.32%) were skull fractures, and 59 (18.67%) were cervical spine injuries. Based on the obtained data, it can be concluded that the high occurrence of RTA emphasizes the significance of adhering to traffic laws and regulations, as individuals who have suffered serious head and neck injuries as a result of maxillofacial trauma may experience potentially fatal consequences. Thus, management for patients with maxillofacial fractures and concomitant traumas should be multidisciplinary and coordinated.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Neck Injuries , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Jordan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Child , Neck Injuries/epidemiology , Aged , Child, Preschool , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Infant , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over
10.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(7): 800-805, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621665

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients sustaining maxillofacial fractures are at risk for associated injuries (AIs) to other body regions. The incidence of AIs is reported to be from 20 to 35%. AIs may be life-threatening and play a key role in considering first-line management at the emergency department, as well as planning the definitive treatment of maxillofacial fractures. PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine the frequency and risk factors for AIs in patients with maxillofacial fractures. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: The investigators designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study of patients with facial fractures treated at Central Hospital (Lahti, Finland) from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2019. All adult patients with verified maxillofacial fractures were included. Patients under 18 years of age were excluded from the study. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was the location of the maxillofacial fractures grouped into three categories: mandible alone, midface alone, and both midface and mandible. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The primary outcome variable was associated body region injuries coded as present or absent. The secondary outcome variable was the location of the AI categorized as skull, neck, thorax, pelvis, or extremity injuries. COVARIATES: Other study variables included demographic data (age, sex, alcohol use), Glasgow Coma Scale, and etiology (fall, traffic- and bicycle accident, assault, pedestrian hit by motor vehicle, work-related, or sports/free-time injuries). ANALYSES: Continuous variables were analyzed for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilks test and compared with categorical variables using the Mann-Whitney test. The univariate analyses of categorical variables were analyzed by the χ2 test (P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant). RESULTS: During the study period, 443 adult (≥18) patients had maxillofacial fractures. AIs were present in 88 subjects (20%). The mean age was 47.6 years (range 18-91); 52 years with AIs (range 19-91), and 47 years (range 18-92) without AIs (P = .03). Subjects with midface and mandible + midface fractures had greater risk to AIs compared to mandibular fractures (relative risk 2.0, P = .002, relative risk 2.8, P = .009). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Every fifth maxillofacial trauma patient had an associated injury. Trauma patients should be evaluated in institutions with trauma protocols and imaging modalities before determining and executing the treatment plan for maxillofacial fractures.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Finland/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged, 80 and over
11.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 28(3): 1241-1250, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600413

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the personal and social lives of millions of people and also impacted the etiological factors of midfacial trauma such as falls, interpersonal violence or traffic accidents. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on maxillofacial trauma surgery in the German healthcare system. METHODS: Nationwide data regarding the national diagnosis-related-group (DRG) inpatient billing system used in all German hospitals was received from the German Federal Statistical Office. Various trauma-associated procedures of the Operation and Procedure Classification System (OPS), a German modification of the International Classification of Medical Procedures (ICPM), were statistically associated with different epidemiological factors between 2012 and 2021. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease (p < 0.05) in surgeries regarding maxillofacial fractures was registered during the years 2020 and 2021. Young male patients had the largest decline in maxillofacial trauma surgeries during this period (p < 0.05). In contrast. elderly patients 80 years and older showed a dramatic increase in the frequency of fractures in both the midface and the mandible (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID 19 pandemic there has been a shift in the number, composition and etiology of maxillofacial fracture surgeries. Measures of social distancing and personal risk avoidance had a societal positive effect on the frequency of facial injuries. This stands in contrast to the drastic increase in fractures of elderly people who should be protected primarily by the measures taken. These results can help to understand these influences better in future pandemics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register No: DRKS00032778.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Maxillofacial Injuries , Pandemics , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Germany/epidemiology , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Adult , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Young Adult , Databases, Factual , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Acute Care Surgery
12.
Ir J Med Sci ; 193(4): 1995-2000, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study investigates maxillofacial fractures in non-indigenous ethnic groups who were reviewed in the national maxillofacial unit in Ireland. The aim of this study was to highlight any potential trends in presentation of facial fractures in non-indigenous groups in comparison to previous reports which have included all ethnicities. This unique study is based on the fact that Ireland has only recently transformed into a diverse, multi-cultural country. This is unlike countries such as the UK and USA which have a long history of multicultural integration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the trauma database of 4761 patients with 5038 fractures who attended the national maxillofacial unit over a 5-year period from 2015 to 2019. Parameters included age, gender, mechanism of injury, fracture sustained, time of the day, day of the week, month of injury, and the referral source were obtained from patient records. RESULTS: The study identified 456 patients who did not identify as being born in Ireland, with 384 males and 72 females. The most common fracture seen was of the zygomatic bone, and the most common mechanism of injury was alleged assault for this cohort. Most injuries occurred in late afternoon with Friday being the most common day of the week. CONCLUSION: This study shows how maxillofacial units need to adapt to the changing trends in Irish demographics with increased demand for resources such as translation services. A further study could evaluate the rapidly changing demographic with mass migration of people currently seeking refuge in Western Europe.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Humans , Ireland/ethnology , Ireland/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Adult , Female , Middle Aged , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Maxillofacial Injuries/ethnology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Zygomatic Fractures/ethnology , Zygomatic Fractures/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over
13.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 83: 126-131, 2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647009

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report and analyze the pattern of maxillofacial injuries in trauma victims and to define the role of a maxillofacial surgeon in an emergency trauma care team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trauma patients reported and reporting to the casualty of a tertiaryhospital with facial injuries and other suspected concomitant injuries in the body were included in this study. The complete medical and radiographic records of each patient were reviewed and data was collected in a standard proforma in this 5-year clinical study (3 year of retrospective and 2 year of prospective study). The complete data related to the facial injuries and associated systemic trauma was recorded and statistical analysis conducted. RESULTS: A total of 18,369 patients with trauma were admitted to the hospital from May 2018 to April 2023. Out of these, 11,277 (61.4%) were males and 7,092 (38.6%) were females. Seventy percent of the reported cases with trauma were in the age group of 14-40 years. The incidence of trauma during the monsoon season was highest (n = 7,927, 43%). The commonest etiological factor leading to trauma was road traffic accident (n = 4,510, 40%). Among facial injuries, the mandibular fractures (n = 1,821, 41%) were predominant. CONCLUSIONS: The management of polytrauma patients should be undertaken by a team of specialists which should include a maxillofacial surgeon as facial injuries were common. This data is essential in developing and assessing the preventative strategies aimed at decreasing the frequency of facial and other injuries.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Multiple Trauma , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Male , Female , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Adolescent , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Child , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Child, Preschool , Aged , Infant , Incidence
14.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(8): 953-960.e4, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583488

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of maxillofacial and head injuries associated with electric scooters (e-scooter, ES) has risen in concordance with its popularity. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare maxillofacial and head injury location, type, and severity related to ES and bicycle accidents and to identify factors contributing to injury severity. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: The authors implemented a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Seattle, Washington, and enrolled a sample of ES riders and bicyclists who sustained maxillofacial injuries between September 2020 and September 2022. The exclusion criteria included nonmotorized scooters, motorized bicycles, injuries with other operators, or vehicles, and pre-evaluation deaths. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was vehicle type, bicycle or ES. OUTCOME VARIABLES: The outcome variables included maxillofacial injury location, distinguished by horizontal facial thirds and injury type, defined as hard or soft tissue. Associated head injury types were also reported as hard (calvaria) or soft (scalp) tissue injuries. The severity of these injuries was quantified using both the injury severity score and the face and head abbreviated injury scale. COVARIATES: Demographic, injury, and treatment-related variables were collected. ANALYSES: Bivariate, multivariate, and regression statistics were computed. Statistical significance was P < .05. RESULTS: The final sample was composed of 205 total subjects, of which 52 (25.4%) were in the ES group and 153 (74.6%) in the bicycle group. Isolated midface injuries were the most common hard tissue location in the ES (15.4%) and bicycle (29.4%) groups. The most common soft tissue injury location included the upper face and midface in the ES group (19.2%) and the midface in the bicycle group (22.9%). Both hard and soft tissue head injuries were more prevalent in the ES group (P < .0002 and P < .0001). Moreover, intracranial injuries were seen in 36.5% of ES subjects compared to 9.8% bicycle subjects (P < .0001). Between the two groups there was no difference in maxillofacial injury severity, but head injuries were more severe in the ES group (P < .0002). Using regression analysis, drug use was found to have a significant impact on the mean injury severity score (P < .002) and helmet use did not have significant impact on face or head injury severity. CONCLUSION: Maxillofacial injury location, type, and severity are comparable among ES and bicycles. However, ES riders are at greater risk of severe head injuries compared to bicycles, and riding while intoxicated has the greatest effect on injury severity.


Subject(s)
Bicycling , Craniocerebral Trauma , Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , Bicycling/injuries , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Craniocerebral Trauma/etiology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Injury Severity Score , Adolescent , Washington/epidemiology , Young Adult , Motorcycles , Abbreviated Injury Scale , Aged
15.
Dent Traumatol ; 40(4): 435-443, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Results of studies investigating the association between traumatic brain injury (TBI) and maxillofacial fractures (MFs) have varied considerably. The present study aimed to evaluate the correlation between TBIs and MFs, as well as the impact of age, sex, trauma mechanism, and season on TBIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 12-year retrospective study of 2841 patients used univariate and multivariate logistic regression to assess the association between MFs and other factors impacting TBIs. RESULTS: Among 2841 patients, 1978 TBIs occurred in 829 (29.2%), with intracranial injuries (n = 828) is the most common. Of 829 patients with TBIs, 688 were male and 141 were female, corresponding to a male-to-female ratio of 4.9:1.0. The most common age group was 40-49 years (24.6%). Vehicles (including motor vehicles and electric vehicles) accidents were the primary causes of injuries. Multivariate regression analyses revealed an increased risk for TBIs among males (odds ratio [OR] 0.632, p < 0.001). Patients >40 years of age were at higher risk for TBIs, especially those ≥70 years (OR 3.966, p = 0.001). Vehicle accidents were a high-risk factor for TBIs (OR 6.894, p < 0.001), and winter was the most prevalent season for such injuries (OR 1.559, p = 0.002). Risk for TBI increased by 136.4% in combined midfacial and mandibular fractures (p = 0.016) and by 101.6% in multiple midfacial fractures (p = 0.045). TBIs were less common in single mandibular fractures, notably in single-angle fractures, with a risk of only 0.204-fold. CONCLUSION: TBIs in MFs were significantly correlated with sex, age, aetiology, season and fracture location. Maxillofacial surgeons and emergency physicians must be aware of the possible association between TBIs and MFs to assess and manage this complicated relationship in a timely manner.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Aged , Adolescent , Child , Risk Factors , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Seasons , Aged, 80 and over , Sex Factors , Infant , Age Factors , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/complications
16.
Dent Traumatol ; 40 Suppl 2: 74-81, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459665

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 lockdown, more domestic violence-related traumas were reported. In this study, we investigated and compared the incidence of domestic violence-related injuries-in particular oral and maxillofacial injuries-in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, before and during the COVID-19 lockdown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study based on 3974 domestic violence cases registered at the Public Health Department, National Traumatology and Orthopedics Research Center of Mongolia between 2018 and 2022. Descriptive and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted. The victims were categorized according to their age (child, adult, and elderly). RESULTS: The mean age of the victims was children 9.7 ± 5.4 years, adults 34.8 ± 8.3 years, and elderly 64.3 ± 8.7 years. Binary logistic regression analysis (no/yes) showed that oral and maxillofacial injuries during the lockdown increased 1.3 times (OR = 1.3; CI 95% = 1.0-1.6; p = .003) in adults and 2.5 times in children (OR = 2.5; CI 95% = 1.7-3.9; p = .001). Additionally, injuries to upper limbs increased 4.6 times (OR = 4.6; CI 95% = 3.5-6.1; p = .001) in adults and 5.2 times in elderly patients (OR = 5.2; CI 95% = 1.8-16.2; p = .01). Additionally, thorax injury in children increased 3.1 times (OR = 3.1; CI 95% = 1.7-5.7; p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: During the lockdown, injury to oral and maxillofacial regions increased in adult and child victims of domestic violence.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Domestic Violence , Maxillofacial Injuries , Adult , Child , Humans , Aged , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , Communicable Disease Control , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology
17.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(6): 663-670, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Though the epidemiology of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) fractures has been well documented at urban hospitals, the characteristics of these fractures in rural hospitals have not been well studied. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report on the epidemiology of CMF fractures at a regional Level 1 trauma center serving a large rural population in central Illinois. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This is a retrospective cohort study at a community-based regional tertiary referral center that serves a predominantly rural population. Inclusion criteria comprised patients with radiologically confirmed CMF fractures between 2015 and 2019. Patients with incomplete medical records were excluded. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: Predictor variables included demographics (age, admission source, race, and sex) and etiology of CMF fracture (assault/domestic violence, all-terrain vehicle/off-road, falls, farm-related, motor vehicle collisions, gunshot wound, and others). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was the CMF anatomic location including nasal bone, orbit, mandible, malar/maxillary, and other CMF fractures. COVARIATES: The covariates are not applicable. ANALYSES: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize a sample of the population characteristics. Wilcoxon ranked sign tests and χ2 tests of independence were used to assess for statistically significant associations between select variables of interest. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2019, a total of 2,334 patients presented to the emergency department with a CMF fracture. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the final sample was composed of 1,844 patients for the management of 2,405 CMF fractures. The majority of patients were male(62.0%) and young adults (aged 18-39) had the highest number of CMF fractures (819) relative to all other age groups. The most common fracture etiology was fall(37.3%), and nasal bone fractures represented the most common fracture location(41.6%). χ2 analyses revealed statistically significant associations between the anatomic location of CMF fracture incurred, and differing categories of age, admission source, race, sex, and etiology. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our study shows that patients seen at our Midwestern Level 1 trauma center are more likely to present with nasal bone and malar/maxillary fractures due to falls. In studies based in urban centers, patients are likely to present with orbital and mandibular fractures due to falls and assault.


Subject(s)
Rural Population , Skull Fractures , Trauma Centers , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Illinois/epidemiology , Aged , Child , Aged, 80 and over , Child, Preschool , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Facial Bones/injuries
18.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(2): 229-235, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38419218

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the patterns of maxillofacial injuries, aetiology and their management during the pandemic of Covid-19 in a tertiary care hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. METHODS: This is a single center, prospective cross-sectional study. Patients from all age groups who presented at the Emergency room of Jinnah Hospital Lahore and managed by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department during 1st December 2020 till 31st January 2021 were included. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 20.0. RESULTS: Total 202 patient were analyzed, 161 (79.7%) were male and 41 (20.3%) were females. Male to female ratio was 4:1. About fifty three percent of patients belonged to the age group 15-35 years. The most common cause was road traffic accidents (RTA), followed by fall. Eighty-three (41.1%) had only soft tissue injuries without any bony fracture and 119 (58.9%) had facial bones fractures. Zygomatic bone fracture was most common (53.8%) followed by mandible fracture (31.1%). Sixty-one out of 119 patients with fractures were treated with Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF). Three patients had complete loss of vision because of facial trauma. Only 56 (28%) patients were managed under General Anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: During the initial pandemic era, a large majority of patients presenting with maxillofacial injuries were young male adults. The most common cause of maxillofacial trauma was RTAs. Soft tissue injuries were predominant followed by facial bone fractures and zygomatic bone was more frequent among the fracture cases. Covid-19 pandemic increased the difficulties faced in the management of maxillofacial trauma patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Maxillofacial Injuries , Skull Fractures , Soft Tissue Injuries , Adult , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Accidents, Traffic , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/surgery , Soft Tissue Injuries/epidemiology
19.
Aust Dent J ; 69(2): 146-156, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38348522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The oral and maxillofacial complex is subject to a range of traumas. Injuries to the region are devastating and have a great impact on social health outcomes. This review intends to investigate the aetiologies of maxillofacial trauma across Australia. METHODS: This review was written in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR. Comprehensive searches of CINAHL, MEDLINE, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were conducted to identify potentially relevant literature. Quantitative observational epidemiological studies were sought and were required to include at least one aetiology to the maxillofacial region in their data set. A total of 31 eligible studies were included. RESULTS: The greatest recorded causes of maxillofacial injuries included inter-personal violence (34.98%) falls (20.87%), sports (15.62%), and motor-vehicle accidents (14.31%). These four aetiologies cumulatively accounted for more than 85% of maxillofacial injuries. From all sustained injuries (n = 7661), the orbit was the most prevalent site of fracture (31.85%), followed by the zygoma (22.01%), mandible (21%), nasal bone (12.45%), maxilla (10.04%), dentoalveolus (1.84%), antrum (<1%), and frontal bone (<1%). CONCLUSION: Violence was an unprecedented cause of trauma-additional research is recommended to further characterize the correlation between the two variables. Research is also recommended specifically in regional/rural communities, where data was particularly limited. © 2024 Australian Dental Association.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Maxillofacial Injuries , Violence , Humans , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology , Australia/epidemiology , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data
20.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(5): 546-553, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, an outbreak of a novel pneumonia-like illness, COVID-19 (C-19), emerged in Wuhan, China. In March 2020, as the incidence of C-19 rose, the Israeli government, like that of other nations, declared a national state of emergency, and a full, general lockdown was announced. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence and characteristics of pediatric maxillofacial trauma presentation during the 2020 C-19 lockdown restrictions and compare them to periods outside lockdown between 2019 and 2020 (pre-C-19). STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A retrospective cohort study was conducted and included all pediatric patients (0-18 years) referred to the emergency department (ED) at Tzafon Medical Center, Israel, and diagnosed with maxillofacial injuries. Patients with missing demographic data and patients who did not complete the medical examination were excluded. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The exposure variable is the date of injury-2020 C-19 lockdown period compared to the previous year (pre-C-19). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The main outcome variable was the number of pediatric maxillofacial trauma ED arrivals out of total pediatric ED arrivals and out of total maxillofacial ED arrivals. COVARIATES: Covariates included patient demographics, etiology, and place of injury. ANALYSES: The association between categorical variables was tested using the Fisher exact test or χ2 test for binary variables with relative risk when appropriate, logistic regression model used to predict outcome variable. P values were 2-tailed and statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 1174 patients. Relative risk of presenting with oral and maxillofacial trauma out of all pediatric ED patients was 1.85 comparing C-19 period to pre-C-19 period (confidence interval [1.65; 2.073], P < .0001). Most of the injuries recorded during the C-19 restrictions occurred in the domestic environment (56.1% compared to 47.5% in pre-C-19, P < .001). Incidences necessitating treatment increased from 45.8 to 55% during C-19 (P = .002). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: During C-19, there was a higher rate of pediatric injuries compared to pre-C-19. The incidence of domestic oral and maxillofacial injuries increased despite the considered home safety.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Maxillofacial Injuries , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Retrospective Studies , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Male , Female , Infant , Israel/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Incidence , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL