Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 60
Filter
1.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 130(5): 475-482, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935553

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Sequelae after maxillofacial fractures are frequent and may affect the patient's quality of life. This study examined sequelae associated with maxillofacial fractures of severely traumatized patients focusing mainly on nerve injuries. METHODS: A retrospective study including trauma patients with relevant facial fractures admitted to our Trauma Center in the period 2011-2016. Presence of posttraumatic maxillofacial sequelae was identified by examining the medical records of the included patients. Focusing on facial sensory deficits and facial nerve paralysis, but also comprising data on diplopia, blindness, malocclusion, trismus, eye globe malposition, flattening of the malar, facial contour changes, and wound infections. RESULTS: Two-hundred-seventy-five severely traumatized patients were included, comprising 201 men (73%), with a median age of 40 years and ISS of 20. 163 (59%) patients only had assessments within 3 months from trauma of which 79 patients (48.5%) had facial complications at initial examination, mostly malocclusion and trismus. Most patients in this group had no or only minor sequelae at their last clinical assessment, mainly being sensory deficits. 112 (41%) patients had assessments both within and beyond 3 months of which 73 patients (65.2%) had facial complications at initial examination, while 91 patients (81%) had reported sequelae within 3 months decreasing to 47 patients (42%) at their last clinical assessment beyond 3 months from trauma, mostly sensory deficits. An improvement of most sequelae was observed. CONCLUSION: Objective sequelae were found to be quite common after maxillofacial fractures in severely traumatized patients, especially sensory deficits. However, most of the addressed sequelae seemed to improve over time.


Subject(s)
Cranial Nerve Injuries , Facial Bones/injuries , Facial Paralysis , Maxilla/injuries , Maxillofacial Injuries , Quality of Life , Sensation Disorders , Vision Disorders , Adult , Cranial Nerve Injuries/complications , Cranial Nerve Injuries/physiopathology , Denmark/epidemiology , Facial Paralysis/diagnosis , Facial Paralysis/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/complications , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/psychology , Patient Outcome Assessment , Sensation Disorders/diagnosis , Sensation Disorders/etiology , Trauma Severity Indices , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Vision Disorders/etiology
2.
Laryngoscope ; 131(2): E331-E337, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32352171

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate olfactory and gustatory function in patients with maxillofacial trauma and associated fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Olfactory and gustatory function was assessed psychophysically in 124 patients who had sustained maxillofacial trauma with an associated fracture. Five groups were defined based on the fracture type: Le Fort, mandibular, nasal, orbital, and zygomatic. Olfaction was measured with Sniffin' Sticks (threshold, discrimination, identification [TDI] score) and gustation with the taste spray method. Patients self-rated olfactory and gustatory function on a visual analog scale prior to formal testing. RESULTS: Ten out of 124 patients were found to be anosmic (8%), with half of them found in the Le Fort (skull base) group. The Le Fort fracture group had significantly lower olfactory function than other fracture types (TDI score = 22.4 ± 10.7; P = .01; possible range = 1-48). The mean gustatory spray test score was 3.82 ± 0.4 (possible range = 0-4) without any intergroup differences. Self-rated olfactory function showed a correlation with the measured scores (r = 0.61, P < .001) across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present data show a significant effect of maxillofacial fracture type on the development of anosmia. Maxillofacial fractures involving the skull base, such as Le Fort fractures, are more likely to cause permanent smell loss, whereas the other fracture types are rarely associated with anosmia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E331-E337, 2021.


Subject(s)
Anosmia/etiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/complications , Nose Deformities, Acquired/complications , Skull Fractures/complications , Taste/physiology , Adult , Aged , Anosmia/diagnosis , Anosmia/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Nose Deformities, Acquired/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Skull Fractures/physiopathology , Smell/physiology
3.
Chin J Traumatol ; 23(2): 78-83, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32178998

ABSTRACT

Trauma during pregnancy deserves special attention because of its management objectives, i.e. well-being of both pregnant woman and foetus. Maxillofacial trauma directly affects the nutrition of foetus by interfering with the normal functions in a pregnant woman such as mouth opening, mastication and breathing. Hence early restitution of form and function of maxillofacial skeleton is essential. However, the gravid status is associated with numerous anatomical and physiological changes which present with clinical dilemma related to imaging and treatment. A careful scrutiny of the patient's systemic and gestational status is absolutely essential before, during and after instituting any interventional procedures. We present a case of bilateral condyle fracture in a 30-year-old pregnant woman in the third trimester (32 weeks). She was treated with inter maxillary fixation using orthodontic brackets & elastics. After successful restitution of occlusion, the patient was advised aggressive physiotherapy which ensured normal mouth opening. Two weeks later, the patient delivered uneventfully. The patient was followed up at one month and 3 month and demonstrated restitution of normal occlusion, mouth opening and lower facial height. This article aims at analyzing the contemporary principles in management of maxillofacial trauma in a pregnant woman and clarifying the common misconceptions.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Mandibular Condyle/injuries , Mandibular Condyle/surgery , Mandibular Fractures/surgery , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Female , Humans , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Mouth/physiopathology , Orthodontic Brackets , Pregnancy
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(9): e19299, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118746

ABSTRACT

This study was performed to examine the epidemiological features of maxillofacial fracture, including the incidence, causes, age and sex distribution, methods of treatment, and prognosis, in a local area.A retrospective study was performed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of 829 patients with maxillofacial fractures treated in a hospital in northern China from August 2011 to July 2019. Sex, age, etiology, fracture site, and treatment method were obtained from the medical records.The average age of all 829 patients was 36.1 years, and most patients were in the 20- to 29-year age group. The male to female ratio was 3.04:1.00. Traffic accidents were the main cause of the maxillofacial fractures. The mandible was the most commonly fractured bone, and the parasymphysis was the most frequently affected site. Head injury was the most common associated injury. Open surgery with internal fixation was the first-choice treatment for most cases.Traffic accidents were the main cause of maxillofacial fractures, followed by falling. Open surgery with internal fixation was the leading treatment choice. Both functional and esthetic outcomes should be considered in the treatment of maxillofacial fractures.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Injury ; 50(10): 1641-1648, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519435

ABSTRACT

AIM: The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the frequency and distribution of retrobulbar haematoma (RBH) among 26 patients (12 male/14 female) who had suffered maxillofacial trauma/surgery, with special focus on anticoagulants, causes of accidents, treatment, and outcome. METHODS: Patient ages ranged from 8 to 94 years, with a mean of 65 years. Among all patients, 43% had received anticoagulant therapy at admission; 92.3% had a previous history of maxillofacial trauma. RESULTS: The most frequent cause of RBH were falls (65.4%), and three patients experienced RBH postoperatively after treatment using polydioxanone foil. Postoperatively (after RBH relief), 33.3% of the patients reported persistent complete visual loss; of these patients, 29% had received anticoagulation therapy, and the oral anticoagulant intake was not documented in further 29% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Awareness of this pathologic process is crucial for preventing permanent loss of vision via early diagnosis and adequate therapy. With increasing age, patients are more likely to receive an anticoagulant, which leads to a higher risk of RBH. Because falling was the most frequent cause of RBH in our patient population and increases in frequency with increasing age, fall prevention is crucial.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Retrobulbar Hemorrhage/surgery , Visual Fields/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/complications , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures , Retrobulbar Hemorrhage/etiology , Retrobulbar Hemorrhage/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
6.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 25(1): 29-33, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30742283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the demographics, clinical features, and treatment costs of maxillofacial trauma cases referred to our hospital during the Syrian civil war. METHODS: The study included 80 cases of maxillofacial trauma. Patients with additional pathologies were excluded from the study. The patients were examined with respect to their demographics and clinical characteristics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), treatments applied, costs, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients included 76 (95%) males and 4 (5%) females, with the mean age of 29.05±9.97 years (range, 13-56 years), and 72 (90%) of them were Syrians injured in the war. The most common mechanism of trauma was the firearms injury in 72 (90%) cases, and the most frequently seen lesion was the mandible fracture (n=48, 60%). The ISS of all the patients was <16, as a severe trauma score. The GCS value was 8-12 in 4 (5%) patients, and 15 in 76 (95%). The most common treatment applied were the reduction and fixation, and graft-flap following fracture (n=12, 15%). The mean duration of hospitalization was 15.27±13.0 days (range, 2-60 days). All patients were discharged from hospital. The mean cost per case was calculated as 5,581.55±56.3 Turkish Lira (range, 772-18,697 TL) or 1,251.24±14.2 US Dollars (US$173-4,192). There was a significant correlation between the costs and the length of hospitalization (p<0.001, r=+0.729) and trauma scores (p=0.004, r=-0.616). CONCLUSION: Firearms-injured young males with mandible fractures were the most common group of maxillofacial trauma cases seen during the Syrian war. The intensity of patients and the cost of the hospital stay have significantly increased because of the ongoing conflict in the neighboring country of Syria.


Subject(s)
Armed Conflicts , Maxillofacial Injuries , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Syria/ethnology , Turkey/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
Emerg Med Pract ; 19(4 Suppl Points & Pearls): S1-S2, 2017 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28745851

ABSTRACT

Patients with maxillofacial trauma require a careful evaluation due to the anatomical proximity of the maxillofacial region to the head and neck. Facial injuries can range from soft-tissue lacerations and nondisplaced nasal fractures to severe, complex fractures, eye injuries, and possible brain injury. Though the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines provide a framework for the management of trauma patients, they do not provide a detailed reference for many subtle or complex facial injuries. This issue adds a more comprehensive and systematic approach to the secondary survey of the maxillofacial area and emergency department management of injuries to the face. In addition to an overall review of maxillofacial trauma pathophysiology, associated injuries, and physical examination, this review will also discuss relevant imaging, treatment, and disposition plans. [Points & Pearls is a digest of Emergency Medicine Practice].


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries/diagnosis , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/therapy , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/physiopathology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Eye Injuries/diagnosis , Eye Injuries/physiopathology , Eye Injuries/therapy , Facial Bones/abnormalities , Facial Bones/injuries , Facial Bones/physiopathology , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Fractures, Bone/therapy , Humans
9.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 72(5): 276-283, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28591339

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:: To characterize the oral motor system of adults with facial injuries and to compare the oral motor performance/function between two different groups. METHODS:: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in 38 patients presenting with facial trauma who were assigned to the Division of Orofacial Myology of a Brazilian School Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1) consisted of 19 patients who were submitted to open reduction of at least one facial fracture, and Group 2 (G2) consisted of 19 individuals who were submitted to closed fracture reduction with maxillomandibular fixation. For comparison purposes, a group of 19 healthy volunteers was recruited. All participants underwent a clinical assessment that included an oral motor evaluation, assessment of the mandibular range of motions, and electromyographic assessment of the masticatory muscles. RESULTS:: Clinical assessment of the oral motor organs indicated that G1 and G2 presented deficits related to the posture, position, and mobility of the oral motor organs. Patients also presented limited mandibular ranges of movement. Deficits were greater for individuals in G1, especially for maximal incisor opening. Additionally, patients in G1 and G2 presented a similar electromyographic profile of the masticatory muscles (i.e., patients with facial fractures presented lower overall muscle activity and significant asymmetrical activity of the masseter muscle during maximum voluntary teeth clenching). CONCLUSION:: Patients in G1 and G2 presented similar functional deficits after fracture treatment. The severity of facial fractures did not influence muscle function/performance 4 months after the correction of fractures.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Motor Activity/physiology , Mouth/physiopathology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electromyography/methods , Face/physiopathology , Female , Fracture Fixation/rehabilitation , Fractures, Bone/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Masseter Muscle/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/rehabilitation , Middle Aged , Posture/physiology , Reference Values , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Temporal Muscle/physiopathology , Time Factors , Young Adult
10.
Clinics ; 72(5): 276-283, May 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-840080

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the oral motor system of adults with facial injuries and to compare the oral motor performance/function between two different groups. METHODS: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in 38 patients presenting with facial trauma who were assigned to the Division of Orofacial Myology of a Brazilian School Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1) consisted of 19 patients who were submitted to open reduction of at least one facial fracture, and Group 2 (G2) consisted of 19 individuals who were submitted to closed fracture reduction with maxillomandibular fixation. For comparison purposes, a group of 19 healthy volunteers was recruited. All participants underwent a clinical assessment that included an oral motor evaluation, assessment of the mandibular range of motions, and electromyographic assessment of the masticatory muscles. RESULTS: Clinical assessment of the oral motor organs indicated that G1 and G2 presented deficits related to the posture, position, and mobility of the oral motor organs. Patients also presented limited mandibular ranges of movement. Deficits were greater for individuals in G1, especially for maximal incisor opening. Additionally, patients in G1 and G2 presented a similar electromyographic profile of the masticatory muscles (i.e., patients with facial fractures presented lower overall muscle activity and significant asymmetrical activity of the masseter muscle during maximum voluntary teeth clenching). CONCLUSION: Patients in G1 and G2 presented similar functional deficits after fracture treatment. The severity of facial fractures did not influence muscle function/performance 4 months after the correction of fractures.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Motor Activity/physiology , Mouth/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electromyography/methods , Face/physiopathology , Fracture Fixation/rehabilitation , Fractures, Bone/rehabilitation , Masseter Muscle/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/rehabilitation , Posture/physiology , Reference Values , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Temporal Muscle/physiopathology , Time Factors
11.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 74(12): 2465-2479, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27584830

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A restricted mouth opening (MO) is predominantly a complication of maxillofacial trauma in pediatric patients and develops in 4 to 26.2% of cases. The purpose of the present study was to quantitatively investigate the influence of patient demographic data, fracture characteristics, and regular vigorous physiotherapy, with either voluntary or forcible MO exercises, on the recovery of a post-traumatic restricted MO in pediatric patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed of pediatric patients with maxillofacial injuries who had been referred to Al-Zahraa and El-Fayoum Hospitals from 2013 to 2015. The predictive variables were patient demographic data, fracture characteristics, and regular vigorous physiotherapy. The patients were treated with a closed technique. The MO measurements were the clinical outcome variables and were recorded at the first week and then monthly for 12 months. Regular vigorous physiotherapy was performed until the patients had returned to their preoperative MO. The data were tabulated and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were enrolled in the present study. Males predominated. Falls were the most common cause of fracture. Condylar fractures had the greatest incidence. A restricted MO occurred in 81 patients. The results showed no interaction between MO recovery and age, gender, etiology, or fracture site. After physiotherapy, the patients had returned to their preoperative MO at the fourth month, with the measurements fixed at normal values at the sixth month. The recovery rate was nonlinear, with faster improvement in the months closest to the injury. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapy is more critical in the recovery of the MO and prevention of bony ankylosis than patient data or fracture characteristics in pediatric trauma. We highly advocate the performance of voluntary mouth exercises, even in the absence of fracture. Forcible MO exercises are mandatory to recover a restricted MO. These exercises should be performed under close supervision of the patient's surgeon with the parents motivated to cooperate for at least 6 months.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Temporomandibular Joint/physiopathology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/etiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome
12.
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 51(8): 480-5, 2016 Aug.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27511039

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of maxillofacial injury on skull base. METHODS: A three-dimensional(3D)finite-element model of cranio-maxillofacial bone was established by CT scan data. A lead cylinder in base diameter of 3 cm was designed as an impactor. There regions(upper right maxilla, left infraorbital margin and left zygomatic body)subjected to an impact at the speed of 8.6 m/s(about 30 km/h)was simulated. Thirteen landmarks at the skull base were selected. The values of stress at the end of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 ms were obtained, and the results were analyzed. RESULTS: The dynamic process of the fracture of the jaw and the stress distribution and conduction of the skull base were successfully simulated in three parts of the face. When the impact was on the right maxillary bone region, the stress values of the three points(medial foramen rotundum, medial foramen rotundum, anterior clivus reached the peak at each time point, 26.2, 22.4, 21.5 MPa(t=0.5 ms)and 70.0, 55.0, 45.0 MPa(t=1.0 ms)and 38.0, 26.5, 39.5 MPa(t=1.5 ms)and 26.0, 19.0, 23.0 MPa(t=2.0 ms), respectively. When the impact was on the left margo infraorbitalis orbitaeta region, the stress values of the two points(medial left foramen rotundum, posterior clivus)reached the peak at each time point, 8.8, 16.0 MPa(t=0.5 ms)and 10.0, 18.0 MPa(t=1.0 ms)and 5.5, 6.0 MPa(t=1.5 ms)and 11.5, 12.5 MPa(t=2.0 ms), respectively. When the impact was on the body of left zygomatic bone, the stress values of posterior clivus were 45.0 MPa(t=0.5 ms), 40.0 MPa(t=1.0 ms), 12.0 MPa(t=1.5 ms), 42.5 MPa(t= 2.0 ms), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the difference of stress distribution and conduction of maxillofacial and skull base bone, the speed and the path of force transfer to the skull base were different. Finite-element dynamic simulation can be used for the biomechanics research on maxillofacial trauma.


Subject(s)
Finite Element Analysis , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Skull Base/physiopathology , Skull Fractures/physiopathology , Stress, Mechanical , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Humans , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/injuries , Maxillofacial Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Orbit/physiopathology , Skull Base/diagnostic imaging , Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Zygoma/diagnostic imaging , Zygoma/injuries
13.
J Am Osteopath Assoc ; 116(2): e8-e12, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26830531

ABSTRACT

Surgical fixation of maxillofacial fractures can be associated with a myriad of surgical complications. Specific complications correlate with the type of fracture. The authors present a case of multiple maxillofacial fractures, briefly review various types of fractures, and discuss the operative decision-making process. This case report serves as an important reminder that the operative decision-making process should take into account a patient's entire clinical condition.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Maxillofacial Injuries/diagnosis , Skull Fractures/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Skull Fractures/physiopathology , Skull Fractures/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
14.
J Craniofac Surg ; 26(3): 691-5, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25974775

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term aesthetic and functional results of suicidal gunshot injuries using objective methods to identify the residual problems after one-stage reconstruction. METHODS: Twenty male patients with gunshot injuries resulting from suicide attempts who were treated in the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Gulhane Military Medical Academy were included in the study. The control group was composed of 10 male volunteers. The reconstructions of all involved structures were performed within 1-3 days of the injury. The patients were evaluated both aesthetically and functionally. The Body Satisfaction Scale was used for evaluation of aesthetic appearances of the facial structures. To evaluate swallowing, videofluoroscopy, cine-magnetic resonance imaging, submental electromyography, Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, and submental ultrasound were performed. Perceptual speech analysis was used for speech evaluation. RESULTS: The Body Satisfaction Scale score was statistically higher in the control group than in patients with both ongoing and completed reconstructions (P < 0.05). Swallowing disturbances and their frequencies were higher in the study group than in the control group. The most frequently observed swallowing disturbance was stasis in the sinuses. The laryngeal elevation and geometric angle of the epiglottis in the study group were statistically lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). The mean amplitude of contraction of submental muscles was lower in the study group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The Multidimensional Voice Program showed statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Objective assessment methods enabled us to retrospectively evaluate the treatment and identify the specific problem underlying functional and aesthetic morbidities.


Subject(s)
Deglutition/physiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Oropharynx/physiopathology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Suicide, Attempted , Wounds, Gunshot/physiopathology , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery , Young Adult
15.
Voen Med Zh ; 334(4): 51-3, 2013 Apr.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24000612

ABSTRACT

The current article is dedicated to the modern aspects of combat maxillofacial trauma as they have been presented in 2012-2013 scientific publications. It has been shown that due to employment of more and more powerful explosive devices the facial trauma over the last decade has occurred more frequently and become more severe. Some new methods of facial injuries treatment are being tested now, among them KSL-W antimicrobial decapeptide, new bone regenerative biocompatible materials, scar-healing mesenchymal and adipose-derived stem cells, and a custom automated face dressing platform.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Military Medicine/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides/therapeutic use , Bandages , Bone Regeneration/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/pathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/therapy , Trauma Severity Indices , Warfare
16.
J Craniofac Surg ; 22(4): 1260-5, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21772202

ABSTRACT

A comprehensive study of adverse outcomes after pediatric facial fractures has not been published. This study aimed to determine the incidence and classify adverse outcomes after facial fractures in children while reporting our early results. A retrospective chart review was performed on facial fracture patients identified in the Craniofacial Trauma Database of the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and seen in follow-up from 2003 to 2007. An Adverse Outcome Classification Scheme was developed: type 1, outcomes resulting from the fracture; type 2, outcomes resulting from fracture treatment; and type 3, outcomes resulting from the interaction between the fracture, its treatment, and subsequent growth and development. Fisher exact or χ analyses were completed. A total of 177 pediatric facial fracture patients were identified with 13.3 months of average follow-up. Mean age was 9.8 years (range, 0.4-18.7 y). Of these patients, 41.8% underwent surgery and 57 patients (32.2%) had adverse outcomes (type 1, 14.1%; type 2, 11.3%; and type 3, 15.8%); 26.3% of these had multiple adverse outcomes. Isolated fractures resulted in fewer adverse outcomes and fewer multiple adverse outcomes compared with combined fractures (26.6% versus 45.3%, P = 0.015; 4% versus 18.9%, P = 0.002). Patients treated operatively exhibited more types 1, 2, and 3 and multiple adverse outcomes compared to those treated conservatively (P < 0.01). In our pediatric cohort, 32.2% of patients had an adverse outcome. With longer follow-up and growth and development studies, we will likely see an increase in the incidence of type 3 adverse outcomes. We recommend, whenever possible, conservative treatment of pediatric facial fractures.


Subject(s)
Facial Bones/injuries , Skull Fractures/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Facial Bones/growth & development , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Male , Mandibular Fractures/complications , Mandibular Fractures/physiopathology , Mandibular Fractures/therapy , Maxillary Fractures/complications , Maxillary Fractures/physiopathology , Maxillary Fractures/therapy , Maxillofacial Development/physiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/complications , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/therapy , Multiple Trauma , Nasal Bone/injuries , Orbital Fractures/complications , Orbital Fractures/physiopathology , Orbital Fractures/therapy , Postoperative Complications/classification , Retrospective Studies , Skull Fractures/complications , Skull Fractures/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Zygomatic Fractures/complications , Zygomatic Fractures/physiopathology , Zygomatic Fractures/therapy
17.
Rev. esp. cir. oral maxilofac ; 33(2): 84-87, abr.-jun. 2011.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-88097

ABSTRACT

El término displasia fibrosa hace referencia a un conjunto de lesiones óseas benignas que se caracterizan por la sustitución del tejido óseo normal por tejido conectivo. Se presenta el caso de una paciente afectada de displasia fibrosa poliostótica de predominio maxilar tratada de forma conservadora con bisfosfonatos(AU)


The term fibrous dysplasia refers to a variety of bony diseases characterized by the substituion of the bone by abnormal connective tissue. A case report of patient affected by a polyostotic form of fibrous dysplasia with an uneven evolution of its disease after being treated with pamidronate is presented(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/complications , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/diagnosis , Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic/complications , Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic/diagnosis , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/drug therapy , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Connective Tissue/pathology , Connective Tissue , Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic/drug therapy , Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic/physiopathology , Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use
19.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 68(1): 93-100, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20006161

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Distinctive mechanisms of primary blast effects have produced a transitional era of facial trauma. Implosion mechanism damage is one of these. Implosion mechanism damage results in injury limited to the gas-containing structures of the auditory canal, paranasal sinuses, gastrointestinal tract, and lungs. Worldwide, the victims of explosive detonations have increased and advanced dramatically. The outcome is greater mortality and morbidity and new types of injuries, especially in the maxillofacial region. Thus, the knowledge of, and experience with, their management should be shared globally by colleagues through publications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The implosion and mini re-explosion of compressed air sinuses leads to skeletal crush injury to the nasal-orbital-ethmoidal, maxillary sinuses, and nasal bones. A variety of surgical approaches were used successfully under conditions of war. The assessment of the associated injuries to the lung and/or brain is the initial priority to any life-threatening blast injury. This article describes the biophysical results of blast injuries to the middle third facial skeleton and associated injuries and details the management and protection of crushed air containing paranasal spaces. RESULTS: Easy, simple, and fast treatment and management were used successfully on the pulverized, fragmented skeletal architecture of the facial middle part without increasing morbidity and with the avoidance of unnecessary surgical trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Injuries in one of the most difficult esthetic, physiologic, and anatomic regions of the body is best treated with an understanding of the biophysical effects of the implosion mechanism on air-containing spaces in the maxillofacial region. The introduction of new methods for the management of severe destruction of hard and soft tissue will decrease the incidence of complications and the operative time.


Subject(s)
Blast Injuries/pathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/pathology , Paranasal Sinuses/injuries , Blast Injuries/physiopathology , Blast Injuries/therapy , Facial Bones/injuries , Facial Bones/pathology , Humans , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Maxillofacial Injuries/therapy , Nose/injuries , Paranasal Sinuses/pathology
20.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-561048

ABSTRACT

Inúmeras técnicas de reconstrução óssea são propostas, seja pela necessidade de quantidade e qualidade óssea, ou por melhor estética para a colocação de implantes. O enxerto autógeno de áreas doadoras intra-bucais, entre elas, é comprovadamente uma das técnicas mais realizadas hoje em Implantodontia (Triplett & Schow, 1996, Widmark et. 1996, Dinato & Polido, 2001). Assim, é de suma importância conhecer as estruturas básicas do desenvolvimento biológico e função do tecido ósseo. Concluindo, o objetivo será estudar a literatura científica a respeito da histologia e fisiologia do osso, bem como a incorporação dos enxertos ósseos autógenos.


A lot of techniques of reconstruction bone are propose, device the necessity or because the quality and quantitative bone, or to improve the esthetic in the place of implantations. The autogenous bone of the intra-oral gift area, between then, one of the main techniques today in Implantology (Triplett & Schow23, 1996, Widmark et al. 199624, Dinato & Polido, 20016). So, is very important to know the basic estructures of biology desenvelopment and the function of bone tissue. Concluding, the purpose will be study the cientific literature of histology and bone physiology, as well the incorporation mechanisms of the autogenous grafts.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Dental Implants/methods , Bone Transplantation , Bone Transplantation/physiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/diagnosis , Maxillofacial Injuries/physiopathology , Mouth Rehabilitation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL