Pilot Data on the Feasibility And Clinical Outcomes of a Nomegestrol Acetate Oral Contraceptive Pill in Women With Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder.

Background: Up to 80% of reproductive-aged women experience premenstrual symptoms. Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) is a severe form, affecting 2-5% of women. Combined oral contraceptive pills (COCPs) are used in the treatment of PMDD. Clinical practice suggests that a newer COCP containing nomegestrol acetate (2.5mg) and 17-beta estradiol (1.5mg), may be a suitable treatment for mood symptoms in PMDD. Materials and Methods: This was a clinical follow-up feasibility study of women who had attended the Monash Alfred Psychiatry research centre, Women's Mental Health Clinic, with a diagnosis of PMDD. 67% of the sample also had concurrent cPTSD, 29% co-morbid anxiety, and 20% depression. They were recommended treatment with nomegestrol acetate/17-beta estradiol. Eligible women were contacted by telephone to answer a questionnaire to assess women's subjective response to nomegestrol acetate/17-beta estradiol, acceptability and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) after being recommended nomegestrol acetate/17-beta estradiol. The paired-sample t-test was used to determine if there were any statistically significant differences in the DASS-21 scores over the study observation period (before and after taking nomegestrol acetate/17-beta estradiol). Results: 35 (74.5%) women reported a subjective positive mood response to nomegestrol acetate/17-beta estradiol, 31 (63.3%) adhered to the medication, and only 10 (20.4%) women reported side effects as the main reason for discontinuing nomegestrol acetate/17-beta estradiol. There were statistically significant reductions (p<0.05) in the overall DASS-21 scores from before women commenced nomegestrol acetate/17-beta estradiol and after commencement of treatment. Conclusions: This preliminary study supports the acceptability and effectiveness of nomegestrol acetate/17-beta estradiol as a treatment for mood symptoms in PMDD. Further research, particularly a randomized controlled trial, is required to elucidate the effect of nomegestrol acetate/17-beta estradiol treatment on mood in PMDD.

Does Nomegestrol Acetate Plus 17ß-Estradiol Oral Contraceptive Improve Endometriosis-Associated Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women?

Background: To evaluate the effects of a 24/4 regimen combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 1.5 mg 17ß-estradiol (E2) and 2.5 mg nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) compared to on-demand nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on women affected by endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain (the primary end point) and their quality of life (QoL) and sexual function (the secondary end points). Materials and Methods: Ninety-nine women on E2/NOMAC constituted the study group; and 63 women on NSAIDs constituted the control group. The visual analogic scale was used to measure the levels of pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. To assess their QoL, sexual function, and sexual distress, the Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS) were used, respectively. The study included two follow-ups at 3 and 6 months. Results: Improvement in chronic pelvic pain was observed in the study group at both the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (p < 0.001). SF-36, FSFI, and FSDS had a similar trend at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (p < 0.001). Women on NSAIDs did not report any reduction in pain symptoms or improvement in QoL (p ≤ 0.4). However, they had a limited improvement of their FSFI and FSDS (p < 0.001). The improvement of the pain symptoms, QoL, FSFI, and FSDS, was more evident in women on E2/NOMAC than in those on NSAIDs, when the study group and control group values were compared at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Women on E2/NOMAC COC showed a better reduction of endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain and an improvement of their QoL and sexual activity than those of the women on NSAIDs.

The effectiveness of quick starting oral contraception containing nomegestrol acetate and 17-ß estradiol on ovulation inhibition: A randomized controlled trial.

To determine the effectiveness of quick starting combined oral contraception (COC) contain 2.5 mg nomegestrol acetate and 1.5 mg estradiol (NOMAC/E2) comparing with 0.075 mg gestodene and 0.02 mg ethinyl estradiol (GS/EE) on ovarian ovulation inhibition rate, we conducted a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial involving 69 healthy female volunteers aged 18-40 years who had normal menstrual history and were randomized at a 2:1 ratio to take one pack of COC containing either NOMAC/E2 (study group) or GS/EE (control group) starting on menstrual cycle Day7-9. The ovarian activity was assessed by using Hoogland and Skouby grading. Forty-six and 23 participants were randomized to NOMAC/E2 and GS/EE groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. No significant difference was observed between the study and control groups for ovulation inhibition rate (93.4% vs. 95.6%, risk difference: -2.2%, 95% CI: -13.1, 8.8), ovarian quiescence rate (91.2% vs. 91.2%, P = 1.000), persistent cyst rate (2.2% vs. 4.4%, P = 1.000), and ovulation rate (6.6% vs. 4.4%, P = 1.000). Quick starting COC during day7-9 of menstrual cycle can inhibit ovulation for more than 90%. The quick starting NOMAC/E2 is non-inferior to GS/EE for preventing ovulation and suppressing follicular growth.

Fertility-preserving treatment of stage IA, well-differentiated endometrial carcinoma in young women with hysteroscopic resection and high-dose progesterone therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The standard treatment for endometrial cancer is surgery with hysterectomy. However, this procedure will cause infertility in young women who desire to preserve pregnant ability. Conservative management with hormone therapy has been shown to be satisfactory in both tumor control and fertility preservation. Recently, hysteroscopic tumor resection followed by progestin therapy has been reported to be an alternative strategy. In this study we present our experience with this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six young patients (30-36 years old) diagnosed with grade 1 stage IA endometrial cancer who wished to preserve fertility were enrolled for this treatment procedure. The patients underwent hysteroscopic tumor resection followed by oral progestin therapy with either megestrol acetate or medroxyprogesterone acetate for at least 6 months. Interval hysteroscopy with biopsy was performed during the treatment course to evaluate disease response. RESULTS: All of the six patients had complete tumor remission after hysteroscopic resection and progestin therapy (five in 6 months, one in 9 months). In a median follow-up of 32 months (range 4-49months), one patient became pregnant spontaneously and delivered a full-term healthy baby via cesarean section. She received a definite surgery 3 months later, and the pathology confirmed no tumor existence. The other five patients were also free of disease at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic tumor resection followed by progestin therapy for early-stage and well-differentiated endometrial cancer is a safe conservative treatment strategy. It could be an option for young patients who wish to preserve fertility.

Efficacy and Safety of Appetite-Stimulating Medications in the Inpatient Setting.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients are subject to acute illness and stress which may impact appetite or weight. Loss of appetite may lead to increased morbidity or mortality. Medications such as dronabinol, megestrol, and mirtazapine are used for weight gain in the outpatient setting; however, there is limited information about safety or effectiveness when initiated inpatient. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of appetite-stimulating medications in hospitalized patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients initiated on dronabinol, megestrol, or mirtazapine for appetite. The primary outcome was change in meal intake between drug initiation and discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included documented improvement in appetite, change in weight and various laboratory parameters, and incidence of adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients met inclusion criteria, and mirtazapine was most commonly used (42%). There was no significant difference between groups of appetite-stimulating medications with regard to mean change in meal intake, weight, albumin, or documented improvement in diet. Within groups, each agent showed numerical improvement in percentage meal intake, with a mean change from initiation to discontinuation of 17.12%. Almost half (48%) of the patients experienced improvement in diet after the start of medications. No serious adverse effects were observed. Conclusion and Relevance: In inpatients, there was no difference in change in meal intake or weight between dronabinol, megestrol, or mirtazapine, but they may show numerical improvements in meal intake. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the use of dronabinol, megestrol, and mirtazapine initiated in the inpatient setting.

A phase 2b multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal rings containing nomegestrol acetate or etonogestrel and 17ß-estradiol in the treatment of women with primary dysmenorrhea.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of investigational vaginal rings containing nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) plus 17ß-estradiol (E2) or etonogestrel (ENG) plus E2 in women with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea. STUDY DESIGN: This was a Phase 2b randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study. We randomized participants to one of five treatment groups: four hormonal rings and one placebo ring. The investigational vaginal rings released 300 µg of E2 daily along with 700 µg or 900 µg of NOMAC or 100 µg or 125 µg of ENG. Each participant received 2 identical rings and was to insert each for 21 days followed by a 7-day ring-free period. The primary endpoint, as assessed by a daily electronic diary (e-Diary), was the change in menstrual pain score from baseline to the second in-treatment withdrawal bleeding episode (Cycle 2). The pain score was the mean of the three highest scores for menstrual cramping pain (0-4 point scale) recorded from the day before menses to the third day of bleeding. The primary hypothesis was that at least one investigational vaginal ring would demonstrate a statistically significant larger reduction from baseline in pain score compared to placebo. Secondary endpoints included total mean impact score (which assessed the negative impact on work/school, physical activities, leisure/social activities) and the amount and days of rescue medication (ibuprofen) used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01670656. RESULTS: We randomized 439 participants. The mean pain score decreased from baseline to Cycle 2 in all groups; the decrease in all four treatment groups compared to placebo was statistically significant (p-values ≤0.002). All treatment groups had greater reductions than placebo in ibuprofen intake and greater improvement in impact scores; these differences were statistically significant for both endpoints for the ENG-E2 100/300 µg/day group, while the other groups were not statistically significant for one or both endpoints. CONCLUSION: All four investigational rings produced a statistically significantly larger reduction from baseline in mean menstrual pain score compared to placebo while pain medication use decreased. IMPLICATIONS: This placebo-controlled study provides evidence that vaginal contraceptive rings containing NOMAC-E2 or ENG-E2 improve moderate to severe dysmenorrhea, across all of doses studied. This adds to the evidence that hormonal contraceptives are effective treatments for dysmenorrhea.

Treatment continuation and satisfaction in women using combined oral contraception with nomegestrol acetate and oestradiol: a multicentre, prospective cohort study (BOLERO).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine treatment continuation and satisfaction over 1 year among women receiving nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC)/oestradiol (E2) combined oral contraception (COC) in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: The 17ß-Estradiol and Nomegestrol Acetate (BOLERO) Study is an observational, non-interventional, prospective, multicentre cohort study of premenopausal women (aged 18-50 years) who received prescription NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) for contraception during routine clinical practice. Assessments were carried out at enrolment and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Probability of treatment continuation through 12 months (primary outcome) was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Secondary outcomes included treatment satisfaction, menstrual cycle-related symptoms, libido and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 298 enrolled women, 292 were evaluable. The probability of NOMAC/E2 continuation through 12 months was 73.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.0%, 78.5%). Satisfaction with NOMAC/E2 increased from 56.9% (37/65) of women at initial evaluation to 89.2% (58/65) of women at 12 months. Physician ratings at 12 months showed satisfactory to very satisfactory in 84.0% (168/200) of women. Libido was not affected. Menstrual cycle-related symptoms significantly declined from enrolment (6.04 ± 4.32) to 3 months (3.25 ± 3.05) and 12 months (2.62 ± 2.74; p < .0001). Treatment-related AEs were reported by 38.7% (113/292) of women. CONCLUSION: The real-world experience of women receiving NOMAC/E2 indicated very good treatment continuation, high satisfaction and significantly improved menstrual cycle-related symptoms.

Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for determination of plasma nomegestrol acetate and estradiol in healthy postmenopausal women.

A highly sensitive and selective ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method is described for the simultaneous determination of nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC), a highly selective progestogen, and estradiol (E2), a natural estrogen in human plasma. NOMAC was obtained from plasma by solid-phase extraction, while E2 was first separated by liquid-liquid extraction with methyl tert-butyl ether followed by derivatization with dansyl chloride. Deuterated internal standards, NOMAC-d5 and E2-d4 were used for better control of extraction conditions and ionization efficiency. The assay recovery of the analytes was within 90-99%. The analytes were separated on UPLC BEH C18 (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) column using a mobile phase comprising of acetonitrile and 3.0 mm ammonium trifluoroacetate in water (80:20, v/v) with a resolution factor (Rs ) of 3.21. The calibration curves were linear from 0.01 to 10.0 ng/mL for NOMAC and from 1.00 to 1000 pg/mL for E2, respectively. The intra- and inter-batch precision was ≤5.8% and the accuracy of quality control samples ranged from 96.7 to 103.4% for both analytes. The practical applicability of the method is demonstrated by analyzing samples from 18 healthy postmenopausal women after oral administration of 2.5 mg nomegestrol acetate and 1.5 mg estradiol film-coated tablets under fasting.

Improvement of Low Sexual Desire Due to Antiandrogenic Combined Oral Contraceptives After Switching to an Oral Contraceptive Containing 17ß-Estradiol.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 17ß-estradiol (E2) 1.5 mg and nomegestrol acetate 2.5 mg (NOMAC/E2) on the sexual health of women affected by low sexual desire due to COCs containing ethinylestradiol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-three women (age range 19-32) participated in the study. Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), total testosterone (TT), and free androgen index (FAI) were measured. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS) questionnaires were used to assess sexual function and distress, respectively. Hormonal levels were measured and questionnaires were administered before the women switched COC NOMAC/E2 usage (baseline) and at the 3-month (first) and 6-month (second) follow-ups. RESULTS: SHBG reduction (p < 0.001), TT (p < 0.05), and FAI increases (p < 0.001) were observed during the first and second follow-ups with respect to baseline values. Sexual desire increased from baseline to the first and second follow-ups (p < 0.001). At baseline, the total FSFI score was 22 ± 1.5 and the FSDS score was 16.6 ± 1.3, both indicating sexual dysfunction with sexual distress. At the first follow-up, the total FSFI score and the FSDS score increased toward sexual health values, being 28.3 ± 1.6 and 12.1 ± 1.5, respectively (p < 0.001). At the second follow-up, the FSFI score had risen to 30.6 ± 1.3 (p < 0.001) and the FSDS score had dropped to 8.3 ± 1.4 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: COCs containing E2 are an innovation that could help women to not suffer from low sexual desire during hypoandrogenic COC usage.

The sexuological impact of hormonal contraceptives based on their route of administration.

Evidence on the effects of hormonal contraceptives on female sexuality is conflicting. We enrolled 556 women, divided into six groups: two composed of subjects using a combined hormonal contraceptive (COC) containing 0.020 ("COC20") and 0.030 ("COC30") mg of ethynyl estradiol (EE), "natural", using COC containing 1.5 mg of estradiol (E2), "ring", using a vaginal ring releasing each day 0.015 mg of EE + 0.120 of etonogestrel, "subcutaneous", using a progestin only subcutaneous contraceptive implant releasing etonogestrel and "controls", using no hormonal contraceptive methods. The subjects were required to answer to the McCoy female sexuality questionnaire and were subjected to a blood test for hormonal evaluation. An ultrasound evaluation of the dorsal clitoral artery was also performed. The higher McCoy sexological value were recorded in the subdermal group; significant differences were recorded among the groups in terms of hormone distribution, with the higher levels of androstenedione in subdermal and control groups. The ultrasound evaluation of dorsal clitoral artery shows a significative correlation between pulsatility and resistance indices and orgasm parameters of McCoy questionnaire. The recorded difference in the sexual and hormonal parameters among the studied hormonal contraceptives may guide toward the personalization of contraceptive choice.

A comparison between the effects of metformin and megestrol on simple endometrial hyperplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial hyperplasia is one of the most serious causes of severe abnormal bleeding and also can be a precursor of endometrial carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of metformin and megestrol on the endometrial hyperplasia. METHODS: The study was performed as a randomized clinical trial on 42 cases of histopathologically confirmed simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. The eligible women were randomly assigned into two groups. In metformin group, metformin was prescribed, 500 mg twice a day (1000 mg daily), for a duration of 4 weeks, and then, followed by 1500 mg daily, for 8 more weeks. In the megestrol group, megestrol was prescribed 40 mg daily for 12 weeks. At the end of the duration of the treatment, endometrial sampling was performed and the results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The women of the two groups did not have significant difference according to age, BMI and gravidity, parity and history of abortion. Overall, 18 women (81.8%) in metformin group and 12 women (60%) in the megestrol group had normal endometrial histology, after 12 weeks of treatment (p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Metformin is comparable with megestrol for the treatment of simple endometrial hyperplasia.

Metabolic impact of combined hormonal contraceptives containing estradiol.

INTRODUCTION: Is the replacement of ethinyl-estradiol (EE) with estradiol (E2) in combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) associated with fewer metabolic effects, leading to a further improvement on safety of hormonal contraceptives? AREAS COVERED: This is a narrative review paper including all available data on the metabolic impact of CHCs containing E2 published in English up to December 2015. Modification of a metabolic variable of interest during the first months of treatment was considered as an outcome. EXPERT OPINION: E2 was extensively used in oral contraceptives associated to nomegestrol acetate (NOMAc) in a monophasic 24 + 4 or its ester E2 valerate to dienogest (DNG) in a quadriphasic 26 + 2 regimen. The impact on the lipid metabolism and the hemostatic system of these preparations seems milder than that caused by EE-based ones, associated with no change of blood pressure. The impact on bone metabolism was instead similar to EE. Data available in the literature are mainly derived from studies having secondary minor metabolic outcomes as the primary end-point, and so currently not completely applicable on the real variables of interest (arterial or venous cardiovascular events, bone fractures). The preliminar parenteral use of E2 seems promising, both transdermal and vaginal, in particular after the introduction of a specific progestin with a high anti-ovulatory activity, like nestorone.

Prediction of nomegestrol acetate pharmacokinetics in healthy female adolescents and adults by whole-body physiology-based pharmacokinetic modelling and clinical validation.

OBJECTIVE: Nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC), a selective progestogen, and 17ß-estradiol (E2), which is identical to endogenous oestrogen, are components of a new monophasic combined oral contraceptive--NOMAC/E2. This study aimed to compare pharmacokinetics (PK) of NOMAC in adolescent and adult women following a single dose of NOMAC/E2. STUDY DESIGN: Healthy postmenarcheal adolescent (14-17years) and adult (18-50years) women received a single dose of NOMAC/E2 (2.5mg/1.5mg) in this single-centre, open-label, parallel-group Phase 1 study (EudraCT# 2008-002142-38). Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis, and concentrations of NOMAC, E2 and its metabolite estrone (E1) were determined for up to 129h following dosing to obtain PK data. An independent whole-body physiology-based pharmacokinetic (WB-PBPK) simulation model of NOMAC based on an independent Phase 3 dataset was used to scale NOMAC concentration-time plots to adolescents. RESULTS: Overall, 52 women were screened, of whom 30 (15 adolescents and 15 adults) were enrolled. No statistically significant differences were observed between the adolescent and adult groups for the clinically evaluated NOMAC PK parameters [maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC) and half-life (t1/2)]. The PK of E2 and E1 showed extensive overlap between both age groups. The WB-PBPK model accurately predicted NOMAC AUC and Cmax values in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in the clinically evaluated PK parameters for NOMAC between adolescent and adult women after a single dose of NOMAC/E2. The WB-PBPK model accurately predicted NOMAC PK data (EudraCT# 2008-002142-38). IMPLICATIONS: PK studies in adolescents are challenging because of ethical considerations. The whole-body physiology-based model described here complements classic noncompartmental and population PK approaches. The utility of this method is its ability to expand to adolescent postmenarcheal girls by using virtual postmenarcheal adolescent population data and applying physiological scaling.

An update on new orally administered contraceptives for women.

INTRODUCTION: The focus in contraception is shifting from oral contraceptives to more effective methods, such as implants and intrauterine devices. Generics are favored by third-party payors. As a result, potentially exciting developments in branded pills to increase safety or to reduce side effects may have gone unnoticed. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the features of each of the four new oral contraceptives that have been introduced in the United States and/or Europe in the last few years. The motivation for the development of each product is outlined as is its efficacy, safety, tolerability and the noncontraceptive applications that have been explored are described. EXPERT OPINION: The hypothesis that using estradiol in place of ethinyl estradiol would reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism is still to be proven. However, the stronger progestogens used in these formulations may offer other tangible benefits for selected women. The new products for extended cycle pill use may have less impact. The flexible regimen can be adopted using any pill, but the approved product does provide convenience to patients. Cost will continue to be the determining factor in the acceptance of these new products, unless substantial health benefits can be conclusively proven.

Zoely: a new combined oral contraceptive.

▼Zoely is the second estradiol-containing oral contraceptive formulated as an 'extended regimen' (pill-free interval <7 days) to be licensed in the UK. However, unlike the quadraphasic estradiol-containing contraceptive Qlaira, it is a monophasic preparation.1,2 It is postulated that combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing synthetic estradiol, which is structurally identical to endogenous oestrogen,3 are potentially safer and better tolerated than those containing ethinylestradiol, the synthetic oestrogen most commonly used in COCs.4 The progestogen in Zoely is nomegestrol acetate, which is structurally related to progesterone,5 in contrast to the majority of progestogens in COCs that are derived from 19-nortestosterone6 and associated with androgenic effects.7 It is suggested that nomegestrol acetate, with its greater specificity for progesterone receptors, may minimise the potential for androgenic, oestrogenic and glucocorticoid effects.7 The company considers Zoely an option for women "who want a contraceptive with hormones similar to her own", and claims that it has a high level of contraceptive efficacy, produces shorter, lighter periods compared with a 21-day regimen of drospirenone 3mg/ethinylestradiol 30µg (Yasmin) and that most women report no negative impact on weight and skin.8 Here we review the effectiveness and place of Zoely.

The effect of therapeutic and supratherapeutic oral doses of nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC)/17ß-estradiol (E2) on QTcF intervals in healthy women: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC)/17ß-estradiol (E2) is a monophasic oral contraceptive that contains a progesterone-derived progestogen (NOMAC), and E2, a bio-identical estrogen. The primary objective of this thorough QT/QTc study was to investigate whether once-daily administration of therapeutic (2.5/1.5 mg) and supratherapeutic (12.5/7.5 mg) doses of NOMAC/E2 were associated with prolongation of the mean Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) interval in electrocardiograms at steady-state concentrations of NOMAC/E2 versus placebo. The co-primary objective was to establish assay sensitivity after a single dose of moxifloxacin (positive control). METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial comparing 2.5/1.5 mg of NOMAC/E2 (therapeutic dose), 12.5/7.5 mg of NOMAC/E2 (supratherapeutic dose), placebo, and moxifloxacin 400 mg. Double-blind study medication was administered from day -1 to 14. Healthy women aged 18-50 years were randomized. RESULTS: The largest time-matched mean QTcF difference compared with placebo for the therapeutic dose of NOMAC/E2 was 1.6 ms, with an upper limit (UL) of a one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of 5.2 ms, and 3.1 ms with an UL 95% CI of 7.0 ms for the supratherapeutic dose. The UL for the time-matched QTcF differences compared with placebo were below the 10 ms threshold defined in the ICH E14 guideline for all time points, both for the therapeutic and the supratherapeutic dose. For moxifloxacin, assay sensitivity was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: This thorough QT/QTc study showed that therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of NOMAC/E2 were not associated with clinically relevant QTc interval prolongation in healthy women after a 2-week period of dosing.

Pharmacokinetic profile of nomegestrol acetate and 17ß-estradiol after multiple and single dosing in healthy women.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of the monophasic oral contraceptive nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) plus 17ß-estradiol (E(2)) were investigated after a single dose and multiple dosing. STUDY DESIGN: NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) was administered daily to healthy women (18-50 years, n=23) for 24 days; blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained on Day 24 and again, after a 10-day pill-free interval, on Day 35 after a single dose. RESULTS: NOMAC reached steady state after 5 days with mean ±standard deviation (SD) trough NOMAC concentration (C(av)) of 4.4±1.4 ng/mL. On Day 24, mean±SD peak NOMAC concentration (Cmax, 12.3±3.5 ng/mL) was reached in mean 1.5 h (t(max)); the mean±SD elimination half-life (t(½)) was 45.9±15.3 h. After a single dose, NOMAC mean±SD C(max) was 7.2±2.0 ng/mL and mean±SD t(½) was 41.9±16.2 h. On Day 24, E2 mean±SD C(av) was 50.3±25.7 pg/mL; mean±SD Cmax was 86.0±51.3 pg/mL. After a single dose, mean±SD E2 Cmax was 253±179 pg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that NOMAC/E2 has a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with once-daily dosing.

A new contraceptive pill containing 17ß-estradiol and nomegestrol acetate.

Most combined oral contraceptive pills contain ethinyl estradiol (EE) with progestins. In order to minimize the pill's cardiovascular risks, the concept of using 17ß-estradiol (E2), the endogenous estradiol, arose in the 1970s. Many attempts to develop a pill containing 17ß-E2 have failed as cycle control was low. The first pill containing 17ß-E2 was launched in 2011. This monophasic pill contains 24 pills with 1.5 mg 17ß-E2 and 2.5 mg nomegestrol acetate, and four placebo pills. Studies conducted in Europe and the USA demonstrate that its Pearl index is 0.38 and 1.13, respectively. It has less influence on hemostasis, fibrinolysis markers, lipids and carbohydrate metabolism than the combined oral contraceptive levonorgestrel/EE (150 g/30 g and 100 µg/20 µg). Withdrawal bleedings are shorter and lighter as compared with women using drospirenone/EE (3 mg/ 30 µg). The number of women without withdrawal bleeding is approximately 30% after 12 months. Even though its contraindications are identical to other combined oral contraceptives, this nomegestrol acetate/E2 pill should be considered to be of interest for many women.

Nomegestrol acetate/estradiol: in oral contraception.

Nomegestrol acetate/estradiol is a combined oral contraceptive with approval in many countries. This fixed-dose combination tablet contains nomegestrol acetate, a highly selective progestogen, and estradiol, a natural estrogen. It is the first monophasic combined oral contraceptive to contain estradiol, and is taken in 28-day cycles, consisting of 24 active therapy days with 4 placebo days (i.e. 24/4-day cycles). In two large, 1-year, randomized, open-label, multicentre, phase III trials in healthy adult women (aged 18-50 years), nomegestrol acetate/estradiol was at least as effective as drospirenone/ethinylestradiol as contraceptive therapy, as the pregnancy rates in women aged 18-35 years (primary efficacy population) in terms of the Pearl Index (primary endpoint) were numerically lower with nomegestrol acetate/estradiol, although the between-group difference was not statistically significant. In both trials, nomegestrol acetate/estradiol was given in a 24/4-day cycle, and drospirenone/ethinylestradiol was given in a 21/7-day cycle. The criteria for using condoms in case of forgotten doses were less stringent in the nomegestrol acetate/estradiol group than in the drospirenone/ethinylestradiol group. Nomegestrol acetate/estradiol therapy for up to 1 year was generally well tolerated in healthy adult women, with an acceptable tolerability profile in line with that expected for a combined oral contraceptive. The most commonly reported adverse events were acne and abnormal withdrawal bleeding (most often shorter, lighter or absent periods). Overall, compared with drospirenone/ethinylestradiol, nomegestrol acetate/estradiol appeared to be associated with less favourable acne-related outcomes, and shorter, lighter or absent periods.

Effects on bone mineral density of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate/17ß-estradiol in comparison to levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate/17ß-estradiol (NOMAC/E2) on bone mineral density with a combined oral contraceptive containing levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol (LNG/EE). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label, comparative clinical study. SETTING: Gynecology center in Norway. POPULATION: One hundred and ten women (20-35 years old) actively seeking contraception. Methods. For 26 consecutive 28-day cycles, women received one of the following two treatments: NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) in a 24/4-day regimen (n= 56); or LNG/EE (150 µg/30 µg) in a 21/7-day regimen (n= 54). Main outcome measures. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, hip and trochanter (measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry); associated z-scores of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. RESULTS: In NOMAC/E2 users, mean (±SD) z-score change from baseline for lumbar spine and femoral neck were 0.019 ± 0.242 and -0.007 ± 0.228, respectively, vs. 0.121 ± 0.269 and 0.044 ± 0.253 in LNG/EE users, respectively. Differences between treatment groups were not significant (p= 0.19 and p= 0.57, respectively). There were no significant differences between changes in hip and trochanter z-scores between NOMAC/E2 and LNG/EE treatments. CONCLUSIONS: After two years, NOMAC/E2 had no clinically relevant effect on bone mineral density. No significant difference in the effect on bone mineral density between NOMAC/E2 and LNG/EE was observed.