Clinical outcomes of ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in a mixed regimen with HP-hMG: a real-world retrospective analysise.

INTRODUCTION: Optimising controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) procedures for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) requires an assessment of the patients' medical history, ovarian reserve, prognostic factors and resources to personalise the treatment plan. Treatment personalisation in IVF is increasingly recognised as being vital in providing a balance of efficacy and safety for patients undergoing the COS procedure. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of an ovarian stimulation protocol employing a personalised dosing algorithm for a novel recombinant FSH (rFSH) derived from a human cell-line - follitropin delta, in a mixed gonadotrophin regimen with human menotrophin (HP-HMG). The main outcome of interest in this study is clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per embryo transfer cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-centre, retrospective, non-interventional study of 20 infertility patients, each individual was provided with a personalised COS regimen based on her ovarian reserve biomarker-serum anti- Mullerian hormone (AMH) and body weight, in a gonadotrophin-receptor hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Personalised dosing of follitropin delta was coadministered with 75 IU of HP-hMG during the COS duration until the final oocyte maturation trigger injection. Ovarian response, pregnancy and safety outcomes resulting from this procedure were assessed and reported here. RESULTS: Following a mean COS duration of 11 days and 50% of patients who underwent frozen embryo transfers, the CPR per started cycle was 70%. The observed CPR from this study was higher than that reported in the follitropin delta Phase 3 studies using rFSH monotherapy stimulation, and additionally showed no incidents of cycle cancellations and no iatrogenic safety risks such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. CONCLUSION: The present study provides a first glimpse into the favourable benefit: risk profile of a mixed protocol regimen using follitropin delta combined with HP-hMG in a cohort of Asian patients in Malaysia.

Pulsatile gonadotropin releasing hormone therapy for spermatogenesis in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism patients who had poor response to combined gonadotropin therapy.

Objective: Both pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and combined gonadotropin therapy are effective to induce spermatogenesis in men with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pulsatile GnRH therapy on spermatogenesis in male patients with CHH who had poor response to combined gonadotropin therapy. Materials and methods: Patients who had poor response to combined gonadotropin therapy ≥ 6 months were recruited and shifted to pulsatile GnRH therapy. The rate of successful spermatogenesis, the median time to achieve spermatogenesis, serum gonadotropins, testosterone, and testicular volume were used for data analysis. Results: A total of 28 CHH patients who had poor response to combined gonadotropin (HCG/HMG) therapy for 12.5 (6.0, 17.75) months were recruited and switched to pulsatile GnRH therapy for 10.0 (7.25, 16.0) months. Sperm was detected in 17/28 patients (60.7%). The mean time for the appearance of sperm in semen was 12.0 (7.5, 17.5) months. Compared to those who could not achieve spermatogenesis during pulsatile GnRH therapy, the successful group had a higher level of LH60min (4.32 vs. 1.10 IU/L, P = 0.043) and FSH60min (4.28 vs. 1.90 IU/L, P = 0.021). Testicular size increased during pulsatile GnRH therapy, compared to previous HCG/ HMG therapy (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For CHH patients with prior poor response to one year of HCG/ HMG therapy, switching to pulsatile GnRH therapy may induce spermatogenesis.

Recombinant follicular stimulating hormone plus recombinant luteinizing hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropins- does the source of LH bioactivity affect ovarian stimulation outcome?

OBJECTIVE: Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) activate distinct intracellular signaling cascades. However, due to their similar structure and common receptor, they are used interchangeably during ovarian stimulation (OS). This study aims to assess if the source of LH used during OS affects IVF outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross sectional study of patients who underwent two consecutive IVF cycles, one included recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) plus recombinant LH [rFSH+rLH, (Pergoveris)] and the other included urinary hCG [highly purified hMG (HP-hMG), (Menopur)]. The OS protocol, except of the LH preparation, was identical in the two IVF cycles. RESULTS: The rate of mature oocytes was not different between the treatment cycles (0.9 in the rFSH+rLH vs 0.8 in the HP-hMG, p = 0.07). Nonetheless, the mean number of mature oocytes retrieved in the rFSH+rLH treatment cycles was higher compared to the HP-hMG treatment cycles (10 ± 5.8 vs 8.3 ± 4.6, respectively, P = 0.01). Likewise, the mean number of fertilized oocytes was higher in the rFSH+rLH cycles compared with the HP-hMG cycles (8.5 ± 5.9 vs 6.4 ± 3.6, respectively, p = 0.05). There was no difference between the treatment cycles regarding the number of top-quality embryos, the ratio of top-quality embryos per number of oocytes retrieved or fertilized oocytes or the pregnancy rate. CONCLUSION: The differences in treatment outcome, derived by different LH preparations reflect the distinct physiological role of these molecules. Our findings may assist in tailoring a specific gonadotropin regimen when assembling an OS protocol.

IVF protocol efficacy in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode.

INVESTIGATION OBJECTIVE: IVF protocol efficacy estimation in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUE: A randomized controlled study embracing results of 51 IVF cycle in women with ovary suboptimal response. The suboptimal response prognostic analysis was performed basing on ≤9 oocyte cumulus complexes obtained in previous IVF programs, the presence of no less than 5-9 antral follicles in both oocytes and amount of anti-Mullerian Hormone ≥0,8 ng/mL. In Group I (n = 25), the stimulation was performed by recombinant corifollitropin alfa combined with highly purified urinary gonadotropin, while in Group II (n = 26) it was made by means of recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa within the protocol of applying gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. RESULTS: The total gonadotropin dose in Group II patients was authentically lower compared to Group I (p˂,01). No statistical difference between the two studied groups was detected concerning the number of obtained oocytes, 2pn zygote, good-quality transferred embryos and clinical pregnancy rate (p>.05). Embryo cryopreservation was performed only for group-II patients. CONCLUSION: Corifollitropin alfa administration combined with highly purified menotropin in IVF cycles for suboptimal responders is quite effective, however, this strategy has no preference over other stimulation modes. The strategy of using recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa can be promotive to IVF outcomes for suboptimal responders by means of embryo banking. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03177538.

Supplementation with human menopausal gonadotropin in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles of women with high AMH: Pregnancy outcomes and serial hormone levels.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of using both HMG and recombinant FSH (r-FSH) in the GnRH antagonist protocol for women with high AMH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted from January 2013 to December 2018. Of 277 GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles in women with anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) ≥5 µg/L, 170 cycles receiving the combination of r-FSH and HMG (77 with HMG added at the beginning of the GnRH antagonist cycle and 93 with HMG added after GnRH antagonist administration) and 107 cycles receiving r-FSH alone were analyzed. The dynamic hormone profiles and embryonic and clinical outcomes of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: We observed significantly lower serum LH levels in the r-FSH + HMG groups during ovarian stimulation. The serum estradiol and progesterone levels were lower in the r-FSH + HMG groups on the trigger day. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences with respect to the number of oocytes retrieved, maturation, fertilization, blastocyst formation rate or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The implantation and live birth rates were increased in the r-FSH + HMG groups compared with the r-FSH alone group, with no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: HMG for LH supplementation in the GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with high AMH is not significantly superior to r-FSH alone in terms of ovarian response and pregnancy outcome. Nevertheless, HMG supplementation might be appropriate for women with an initially inadequate response to r-FSH or intracycle LH deficiency.

Application of Pulsed Rhythmic Drug Administration to Ovulation Induction Therapy in PCOS Patients with Clomiphene-Resistance: a Retrospective Research.

There is currently a dispute over the choice of ovulation induction treatment for infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The objective of this study is to compare the therapeutic effect of pulsed rhythmic administration protocol (PRAP) with conventional letrozole + human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) in patients with clomiphene-resistance polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). A retrospective analysis of 821 intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles between January 2015 and January 2020 was performed. Of these, 483 cycles were treated with a pulsed rhythmic administration protocol (PRAP), and 338 cycles were treated with conventional letrozole + HMG protocol (LHP). The therapeutic effect of the two protocols has been compared. The pregnancy rate was 18.07% in the LHP and 27.07% in the PRAP. The ongoing pregnancy rate in LHP was 14.46% and in PRAP was 22.73%. The research suggests that PRAP is more effective than LHP and could be an adequate ovulation induction strategy for the IUI cycle of patients with clomiphene-resistance PCOS.

Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa; GONAL-f®) with urinary highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP; Menogon HP®), during assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments in Germany. METHODS: Data were collected from 71 German fertility centres between 01 January 2007 and 31 December 2012, for women undergoing a first stimulation cycle of ART treatment with r-hFSH-alfa or hMG HP. Primary outcomes were live birth, ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy, based on cumulative data (fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers), analysed per patient (pP), per complete cycle (pCC) and per first complete cycle (pFC). Secondary outcomes were pregnancy loss (analysed per clinical pregnancy), cancelled cycles (analysed pCC), total drug usage per oocyte retrieved and time-to-live birth (TTLB; per calendar week and per cycle). RESULTS: Twenty-eight thousand six hundred forty-one women initiated a first treatment cycle (r-hFSH-alfa: 17,725 [61.9%]; hMG HP: 10,916 [38.1%]). After adjustment for confounding variables, treatment with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP was associated with a significantly higher probability of live birth (hazard ratio [HR]-pP [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.10 [1.04, 1.16]; HR-pCC [95% CI]: 1.13 [1.08, 1.19]; relative risk [RR]-pFC [95% CI]: 1.09 [1.05, 1.15], ongoing pregnancy (HR-pP [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.04, 1.16]; HR-pCC [95% CI]: 1.13 [1.08, 1.19]; RR-pFC [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.05, 1.15]) and clinical pregnancy (HR-pP [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.05, 1.14]; HR-pCC [95% CI]: 1.14 [1.10, 1.19]; RR-pFC [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.06, 1.14]). Women treated with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP had no statistically significant difference in pregnancy loss (HR [95% CI]: 1.07 [0.98, 1.17], were less likely to have a cycle cancellation (HR [95% CI]: 0.91 [0.84, 0.99]) and had no statistically significant difference in TTLB when measured in weeks (HR [95% CI]: 1.02 [0.97, 1.07]; p = 0.548); however, r-hFSH-alfa was associated with a significantly shorter TTLB when measured in cycles versus hMG HP (HR [95% CI]: 1.07 [1.02, 1.13]; p = 0.003). There was an average of 47% less drug used per oocyte retrieved with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP. CONCLUSIONS: This large (> 28,000 women), real-world study demonstrated significantly higher rates of cumulative live birth, cumulative ongoing pregnancy and cumulative clinical pregnancy with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP.

Ovulation induction with high progesterone levels may be more suitable for elderly patients with low ovarian response.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to explore the outcomes of using the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol in aged infertile women. The patients recruited in the study had displayed a poor ovarian response (POR) in the first IVF/ICSI-ET cycles with the ultra-short gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self-controlled retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical outcomes of 117 aged infertile women who met the inclusion criteria. The patients were grouped into two; group B included patients who had displayed a poor ovarian response (POR) in the first IVF/ICSI-ET cycle with the ultra-short GnRH-a protocol. Group A was made up of patients who underwent the PPOS protocol in the second cycle. The study was done between January 2015 to May 2018 in the reproductive and genetic centre of integrated traditional and western medicine, Affiliated hospital of Shandong University of traditional Chinese medicine. Reproduction-related clinical outcomes in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the serum levels of LH, E2, and P on the trigger day between group A and group B (P＞0.05). The number of follicles with a diameter > 14 mm was significantly higher in the PPOS protocol patients than in the ultra-short GnRH-a protocol group (4.83 ± 2.82 vs. 3.25 ± 2.53, P < 0.01). The duration and total dosage of gonadotropin of the PPOS protocol group were less than in the previous ultra-short GnRH-a protocol, although the statistical differences were not significant (P > 0.05). The number of eggs obtained in the PPOS group was significantly higher than that of the previous one (4.29 ± 3.11 vs. 2.76 ± 2.33, P < 0.05). The numbers of MII eggs, cleavage, 2 P N, transplantable embryos, and high quality embryos were higher in the PPOS protocol group than that in the ultra-short protocol group. However, the differences between the two groups in all the above parameters were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The rate of high-quality embryos was significantly higher in the PPOS protocol group than in the ultra-short protocol group (38.61(100/259) vs. 32.02(65/203), P < 0.05). Although not statistically significant (P > 0.05), the abortion rate of the PPOS protocol group was higher than that of the ultra-short protocol group. The clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the PPOS protocol group than in the ultra-short protocol group (p < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rates in the PPOS protocol group and the ultra-short protocol group were 32.35 % and 25.53 % respectively while the live birth rates were 27.45 % and 21.28 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with the ultra-short protocol, the PPOS protocol improves the number of follicles, the number of eggs, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates in POR patients. The PPOS protocol could, therefore, provide a novel treatment strategy for inducing ovulation in POR patients.

Human Menopausal Gonadotropin Commenced on Early Follicular Period Increases Live Birth Rates in POSEIDON Group 3 and 4 Poor Responders.

Human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) has LH activity, and it may have beneficial effects in terms of oocyte quality and endometrial receptivity similar to recombinant LH supplementation. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of hMG, and its commencement time on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles of POSEIDON group 3 and 4 poor responders. Data of 558 POSEIDON group 3 and 4 poor responders who underwent ART treatment following a GnRH antagonist cycle at a university-based infertility clinic between January 2014 and December 2019 were reviewed. hMG was commenced at the early follicular phase or mid-follicular phase in the study groups. The control group did not receive hMG stimulation. Live birth rate (LBR) was the main outcome measure. The mean duration of stimulation was significantly shorter in early follicular hMG group than in mid-follicular hMG group (11.9 ± 3.6 days vs. 12.8 ± 4 days, respectively; P = 0.027). The mean numbers of oocytes retrieved and MII oocytes were comparable between the groups. The LBRs per embryo transfer in early follicular hMG, mid-follicular hMG, and control groups were 21.9%, 11.7%, and 11.6%, respectively (P = 0.035). In conclusion, there is a significant association between the commencement time of hMG and live birth chance in ART cycles of POSEIDON group 3 and 4 poor responders. Early initiation of hMG together with rFSH seems to be beneficial in this specific population.

Can Ratios Between Prognostic Factors Predict the Clinical Pregnancy Rate in an IVF/ICSI Program with a GnRH Agonist-FSH/hMG Protocol? An Assessment of 2421 Embryo Transfers, and a Review of the Literature.

None of the models developed in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) is sufficiently good predictors of pregnancy. The aim of this study was to determine whether ratios between prognostic factors could predict the clinical pregnancy rate in IVF/ICSI. We analyzed IVF/ICSI cycles (based on long GnRH agonist-FSH protocols) at two ART centers (the second to validate externally the data). The ratios studied were (i) the total FSH dose divided by the serum estradiol level on the hCG trigger day, (ii) the total FSH dose divided by the number of mature oocytes, (iii) the serum estradiol level on the trigger day divided by the number of mature oocytes, (iv) the serum estradiol level on the trigger day divided by the endometrial thickness on the trigger day, (v) the serum estradiol level on the trigger day divided by the number of mature oocytes and then by the number of grade 1 or 2 embryos obtained, and (vi) the serum estradiol level on the trigger day divided by the endometrial thickness on the trigger day and then by the number of grade 1 or 2 embryos obtained. The analysis covered 2421 IVF/ICSI cycles with an embryo transfer, leading to 753 clinical pregnancies (31.1% per transfer). Four ratios were significantly predictive in both centers; their discriminant power remained moderate (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between 0.574 and 0.610). In contrast, the models' calibration was excellent (coefficients: 0.943-0.978; p < 0.001). Our ratios were no better than existing models in IVF/ICSI programs. In fact, a strongly discriminant predictive model will be probably never be obtained, given the many factors that influence the occurrence of a pregnancy.

Individualized ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, open label, exploratory study with a mixed protocol of follitropin delta and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile and the number of usable blastocysts on day 5 and on day 6 after treatment with an individualized dosing regimen of a follitropin delta and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) for controlled ovarian stimulation. DESIGN: Multicenter, open label, exploratory study. SETTING: Reproductive medicine clinics. PATIENT(S): A total of 110 patients (aged 18-40 years). INTERVENTION(S): Follitropin delta coadministered with HP-hMG, with follitropin delta dose fixed according to an established algorithm and HP-hMG dose at 75 IU when the follitropin delta starting dosage was <12 µg; 150 IU when follitropin delta dosage was 12 µg and weight <100 kg, and 225 IU when follitropin delta dosage was 12 µg and weight ≥100 kg (dosage adjustments confined to HP-hMG only). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean number of good-quality blastocysts obtained at day 5 and day 6 as well as the proportion of women with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). RESULT(S): A cohort study was compared with the follitropin delta group from the Evidence-based Stimulation Trial with Human Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Europe and Rest of World 1 (ESTHER-1) study. Even when stratified by age, a statistically significantly higher mean in the number of oocytes retrieved and number of good-quality blastocysts was observed in this study compared with the ESTHER-1 trial in which follitropin delta was used alone. The rate of patients triggered with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was statistically significantly higher in our Menopur and Rekovelle Combined Study (MARCS) cohort (43%) when compared with the rates reported in the follitropin delta cohort in the ESTHER-1 study (2.3%). Incidence of any grade of OHSS was 9.3% in the present study compared to 2.6% in follitropin delta group from ESTHER-1 trial. No cases of moderate or severe OHSS were observed in our study compared with 1.4% in the follitropin delta group of ESTHER-1. CONCLUSION(S): Optimizing the ovarian response during in vitro fertilization employing a mixed protocol of individualized dosing of follitropin delta and HP-hMG resulted in a statistically significant number of usable blastocysts on days 5 and 6 with an increased risk of mild OHSS, which did not require medical intervention or hospitalization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03483545.

The effect of letrozole versus artificial hormonal endometrial preparation on pregnancy outcome after frozen-thawed embryos transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Considering that clinical trial studies are limited in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients, and there is no consensus on an optimum endometrial preparation protocol for frozen embryo transfer (FET), the present study was designed as a randomized clinical trial to compare the reproductive outcomes following stimulated cycles with letrozole plus human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for endometrial preparation compared with routine AC-FET. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was carried out on infertile PCOS patients who underwent IVF/ICSI and FET cycles in Arash Women's Hospital affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences between September 2018 and January 2020. PCOS diagnosis was based on the Rotterdam criteria. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into two groups: stimulated cycle with letrozole plus (HMG) (intervention group) and routine artificial hormonal endometrial preparation (control group). RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven infertile patients were recruited for participation in the study. Of these, 57 women were excluded due to non-eligibility for entering the study, and a total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to two study groups. After follow up, the cycle outcomes of 57 patients in the intervention group and 59 patients in the control group were compared. The data analysis showed that the two groups did not have significant differences in fundamental and demographic characteristics. After the intervention, there were no significant differences in implantation rate, chemical, ectopic, and clinical pregnancy rates between groups. Moreover, the rates of miscarriage and ongoing pregnancy were similar between groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found similar pregnancy outcomes with two endometrial preparation methods. Noting that each treatment centre should select the most beneficial and cost-effective method with the least adverse effects for patients, letrozole preparations for FET could be incorporated into possible options; however, establishing this approach as first-line treatment is premature in light of current evidence, and future randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are required for widespread application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was also registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials on March 20th, 2020. ( IRCT20090526001952N12 at www.irct.ir , registered retrospectively).

Qualitative risk assessment of follicle stimulating hormone injectable products.

BACKGROUND: Gonadotropin injections for fertility treatment regimens are usually self-injected, typically over 8-12 days during the assisted reproductive technology cycle. Parenteral gonadotropins are available in different formulations and administered through various systems. A user experience study and risk assessment were performed to evaluate different product types for risks to the patient when preparing and administering injections. METHODS: Nine women of child-bearing age each prepared and administered injections of six products representing single- and multidose vials of menotropin for reconstitution (Merional® and Menopur®), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) reusable pen injectors with (Puregon®), and without cartridges (Gonal-f®), and single-use FSH pre-filled pens (Bemfola®). Risk assessments based on user feedback were made with reference to EU regulations for implementing practices for safe use of injectable products. RESULTS: Products requiring reconstitution with diluent in glass ampoules were associated with medium risk for sharps injury and a lower level of user confidence. Pen injectors were considered easy-to-use, with a low risk of sharps injury. Single-use pens were associated with the lowest risk of dosing errors. CONCLUSIONS: The study identifies differences in the risks for both sharps injuries and dosing errors between FSH delivery options that practitioners should consider when making a treatment choice.

Replacing HMG/FSH by low-dose HCG to complete corifollitropin alfa stimulation reduces cost per clinical pregnancy: a randomized pragmatic trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The cost of IVF treatment remains high, among other factors because of the medication needed for ovarian stimulation. This study investigated the effect of using low-dose human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) for the second phase of follicular maturation after corifollitropin alfa induction, to replace the more expensive, either recombinant or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), on the cost of ovarian stimulation. DESIGN: One hundred and five patients were randomly divided into two groups: patients in the HCG group (n = 50) received low-dose HCG from Day 7 until the diameter of at least three follicles reached 17 mm or more, while patients in the FSH group (n = 55) received conventional ovarian stimulation with highly purified HMG injections. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate in the HCG group was 38% higher than in the FSH group (number needed to treat, NNT = 13). The cost per pregnancy needed for ovarian stimulation was reduced from €4902 in the FSH group to €2684 in the HCG group. Hence, the cost of ovarian stimulation medication to obtain 10 pregnancies using the conventional FSH protocol is sufficient to attain 18 pregnancies when applying the low-dose HCG protocol. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that using HCG instead of HMG/FSH for ovarian stimulation results in a significant reduction in the cost of IVF with, at least, an equivalent pregnancy rate.

Pregnancy And Neonatal Outcomes Of hMG Stimulation With Or Without Letrozole In Endometrial Preparation For Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer In Ovulatory Women: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Frozen-thawed embryo transfer enables surplus embryos derived from IVF or IVF-ICSI treatment to be stored and transferred in subsequent cycles into a more "physiologic environment". This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of letrozole use or hMG stimulation on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in ovulatory patients undergoing FET. METHODS: This study includes a total of 5901 FET cycles with letrozole use (n = 1569), HMG (n =1827) or letrozole + HMG (n = 2505). In the letrozole group, 2.5 mg of letrozole was administered on menstrual cycle day 3 to 5 for 3 days for patients, and then follicle growth was monitored beginning on day 10. If the follicular diameter was ≥14 mm on the 10th day, no other ovarian stimulation drugs were needed. If the follicular diameter was <14 mm on the 10th day, 150 IU human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) was added to stimulate follicle growth every two days (hMG + letrozole group). In hMG stimulation group, a total of 150 IU of hMG was injected every two days to stimulate development of follicles from cycle day 10 to 12. RESULTS: Compared with the patients undergoing hMG stimulation, the group receiving letrozole or letrozole+HMG stimulation exhibits significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates per transfer (hMG: 47.02% vs letrozole: 52.07% vs letrozole+HMG: 52.26%) and implantation rates (hMG: 31.76% vs letrozole: 34.36% vs letrozole+HMG: 34.24%). In addition, the letrozole group was associated with a statistically significantly lower incidence of miscarriage (hMG: 14.78% vs letrozole: 10.53% vs letrozole+HMG: 14.13%) and ectopic pregnancies (hMG: 1.83% vs letrozole: 0.97% vs letrozole+HMG: 1.58%) than the letrozole + HMG and HMG groups. Neonatal outcomes are similar among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the letrozole use may improve clinical pregnancy outcomes and decrease the risk of ectopic pregnancies and miscarriage in ovulatory patients who receive FET cycles.

A cohort study of both human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and recombinant luteinizing hormone addition at early follicular stage in in vitro fertilization outcome: A STROBE-compliant study.

At present, the precise role of human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) supplementation at an early time of follicular phase on in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra cytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes remains uncertain.Here infertile women of normal ovarian function undergoing their first cycle of IVF/ICSI were studied and were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Group 1, ovarian stimulation with 150IU recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone. Group 2, patients received 75IU rFSH and 75IU HMG. Group 3 patients were given 150IU rFSH and 75IU rLH.There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics, ovarian response, the biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates among the 3 groups. No significant differences were found in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between the patients whose LH levels were lower than 0.75 mIU/ml and those above this threshold in group 1. Furthermore, there were also no significant differences in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates among the 3 group patients whose LH level lower than 0.75 mIU/ml.The results showed that either the addition of HMG or rLH supplementation at an early time of follicular phase produce no significant benefit on IVF outcome in patients with normal ovarian function.

Do poor-responder patients undergoing IVF benefit from splitting and increasing the daily gonadotropin dose?

We aim to retrospectively evaluate the role of increasing the gonadotropin daily dose from 450 IU/day to 300 IU twice a day on IVF-ET outcome in poor responder patients. All consecutive women admitted to our IVF unit and underwent COH consisting of daily gonadotropin dose of 450 IU, followed by an IVF cycle using 300 IU twice a day, were included. Ovarian stimulation characteristics, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryo transferred and pregnancy rate was assessed. Twenty-three patients undergoing both cycles were evaluated. While there was no between-group difference in the duration of COH, number of 2PN embryos, fertilization rate and number of embryos transferred, patients receiving daily gonadotropin 300 IU twice a day achieved a significantly higher peak estradiol levels (3350.39 ± 2364.26 vs. 2223.74 ± 1299.91; p < .03, respectively), and yielded significantly higher number of follicles >15 mm in diameter on day of hCG administration (3.2 ± 2.4 vs 1.8 ± 1; p < .03, respectively) and higher number of oocytes retrieved (3.48 ± 2.54 vs 1.87 ± 1.1; p < .02, respectively) with an acceptable live birth rate (5%). To conclude, in poor responders undergoing COH a daily gonadotropin dose of 450 IU, increasing the dose to 300 IU twice daily may result in higher oocyte yield, with the possible improvement in IVF outcome.

Treatment of idiopathic oligozoospermia with combined human chorionic gonadotropin/human menopausal gonadotrophin: A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study.

To evaluate whether hCG/hMG therapy has beneficial effects on idiopathic oligozoospermia in Chinese infertility population. The patients were randomly divided into the treatment group receiving hCG/hMG for 3 months and the placebo group receiving placebo for 3 months. Semen and biochemical analysis was performed, and DNA fragmentation as well as spermatid concentration was evaluated. Administration of hCG/hMG for 3 months could significantly improve sperm concentration, rate of forward motile spermatozoa, total motile sperm count, the percentage of sperm with normal morphology and the rate of spontaneous pregnancy in medium- and higher-level inhibin B group respectively. Moreover, in medium- and higher-level inhibin B group, sperm DNA fragmentation index and spermatid concentration were significantly declined respectively at the end of treatment. However, there were no significant differences in lower-level inhibin B group before and after treatment in term of seminal parameters, DNA fragmentation and spermatid concentration. HCG/hMG therapy for 3 months has a beneficial effect on a part of male with idiopathic oligozoospermia, and the efficacy of hCG/hMG therapy is associated with the inhibin B level.

The impact of HCG in IVF Treatment: Does it depend on age or on protocol?

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effect of the addition of low dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) throughout the early follicular phase in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) conducted with two difference regimens. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and short GnRH-agonist protocol were applied in two in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics. METHODS: Clinical study conducted during the period 2014-2016 in two IVF clinics in a cohort of 240 women. In the first group 1 (124 women), a GnRH antagonist protocol with HMG and addition of low dose (100IU/day) h CG was applied. The other group 2 consisted of 116 women who underwent a short GnRH- agonist protocol with HMG and addition of low dose (100IU/day) h CG. RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. The group 2 found to be associated with greater number of follicles and oocytes. The pregnancy rates were 12.1% and 26.7% in group 1 and group 2, respectively (p=0.004). For patients over 40 years, the number of follicles and oocytes retrieved were significant higher in group 2.The pregnancy rate in group 2 was higher than in group 1 (21, 6% vs 5%, p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age women are likely to achievepregnancy using the GnRH Short than GnRH antagonist, when HMG/hCG is used, while HMG-hCG gonadotropins have the same potentialas Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH)-hCG used in GnRH short protocol.

Lower rate of early pregnancy loss in patients experiencing early-onset low LH in GnRH antagonist cycles supplemented with menotropin.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The role of LH during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in the general population remains contentious. There is no consensus on the indications for LH supplementation during COS. The purpose of this study is to determine whether menotropin supplement is associated with decreases in early pregnancy loss rates in patients exhibiting low endogenous LH during COS. METHOD: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort from a university-affiliated hospital. Patients were enrolled from the in-vitro fertilization center from January, 2011 to December, 2014. Patients who experienced a LH level â‰¦ 0.8 mIU/mL during stimulation were identified, and patients that received menotropin supplementation were compared to those without menotropin supplementation. Outcome variables, including the number of oocytes retrieved, embryos obtained, implantation rates, pregnancy rates and early pregnancy loss rates, were compared. RESULTS: Patients that experienced low LH during GnRH antagonist protocol and were supplemented with menotropin were associated with lower early pregnancy loss when compared with patients without menotropin supplementation (26.7% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.045). More specifically, in patients who exhibited early-onset low LH, before the use of GnRH antagonists, menotropin supplementation was associated with significantly lower early pregnancy loss compared with non-supplemented patients (3.3% vs. 29.0%, OR: 0.08, p = 0.012). Beneficial effects persisted after adjusting for confounders (aOR: 0.103, 95% CI: 0.011-0.933). CONCLUSION: Menotropin supplementation is associated with decreased early pregnancy loss in patient who exhibited low LH during GnRH antagonist cycles. This effect is especially prominent in patients who experience low LH before the start of GnRH antagonists.