Automated detection of cognitive impairment in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive impairment is now recognized as an impending public health crisis. About one-third of adults are concerned about their cognition, and the prevalence of objective cognitive impairment is much higher among those with neurological disorders. Existing screening tools are narrowly focused on detecting dementia in older adults and must be clinician-administered and scored, making them impractical for many neurology practices. This study examined the utility of a brief, self-administered, computerized cognitive screening tool, the Brief Assessment of Cognitive Health (BACH), in identifying cognitive impairment in adults. METHODS: 912 adults (ages 18-84) completed BACH and a neuropsychological battery. Multivariable models were developed to provide a BACH index score reflecting the probability of cognitive impairment for individual patients. Predictive accuracy was compared to that of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a subset of 160 older adults from a Memory Disorders clinic. RESULTS: The final multivariable model showed good accuracy in identifying cognitively impaired individuals (c = 0·77). Compared to MoCA, BACH had superior predictive accuracy in identifying older patients with cognitive impairment (c = 0·79 vs. 0·67) as well as differentiating those with MCI or dementia from those without cognitive impairment (c = 0·86 vs. c = 0·67). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that cognitive impairment can be identified in adults using a brief, self-administered, automated cognitive screening tool, and BACH provides several advantages over existing screeners: self-administered; automatic scoring; immediate results in health record; easily interpretable score; utility in wide range of patients; and flags for treatable factors that may contribute to cognitive complaints (i.e., depression, sleep problems, and stress).

Validity of the MoCA as a cognitive screening tool in epilepsy: Are there implications for global care and research?

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a widely available cognitive screener, the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), to detect cognitive impairment in older patients (age ≥ 55) with epilepsy residing in the US, using the International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy (IC-CoDE) as the gold standard. METHODS: Fifty older adults with focal epilepsy completed the MoCA and neuropsychological measures of memory, language, executive function, and processing speed/attention. The IC-CoDE taxonomy divided participants into IC-CoDE Impaired and Intact groups. Sensitivity and specificity across several MoCA cutoffs were examined. Spearman correlations examined relationships between the MoCA total score and clinical and demographic variables and MoCA domain scores and individual neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: IC-CoDE impaired patients demonstrated significantly lower scores on the MoCA total, visuospatial/executive, naming, language, delayed recall, and orientation domain scores (Cohen's d range: 0.336-2.77). The recommended MoCA cutoff score < 26 had an overall accuracy of 72%, 88.2% sensitivity, and 63.6% specificity. A MoCA cutoff score < 24 yielded optimal sensitivity (70.6%) and specificity (78.8%), with overall accuracy of 76%. Higher MoCA total scores were associated with greater years of education (p = 0.016) and fewer antiseizure medications (p = 0.049). The MoCA memory domain was associated with several standardized measures of memory, MoCA language domain with category fluency, and MoCA abstraction domain with letter fluency. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides initial validation of the MoCA as a useful screening tool for older adults with epilepsy that can be used to identify patients who may benefit from comprehensive neuropsychological testing. Further, we demonstrate that a lower cutoff (i.e., <24) better captures cognitive impairment in older adults with epilepsy than the generally recommended cutoff and provides evidence for construct overlap between MoCA domains and standard neuropsychological tests. Critically, similar efforts in other regions of the world are needed. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) can be a helpful tool to screen for cognitive impairment in older adults with epilepsy. We recommend that adults 55 or older with epilepsy who score less than 24 on the MoCA are referred to a neuropsychologist for a comprehensive evaluation to assess any changes in cognitive abilities and mood.

A Combined Index Using the Mini-Mental State Examination and Lawton Index to Discriminate Between Clinical Dementia Rating Scores of 0.5 and 1: A Development and Validation Study.

Objective: To develop a combined index using cognitive function and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) to discriminate between Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores of 0.5 and 1 in the clinical setting, and to investigate its optimal cutoff values and internal and external validities.Methods: We included outpatients aged 65-89 years with CDR scores of 0.5 or 1. The optimal cutoff values and internal validity were verified using Japanese memory clinic-based datasets between September 2010 and October 2021 [National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (NCGG) datasets]. Cognitive function and IADL were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Lawton Index (LI), respectively. The optimal cutoff values were defined using the Youden Index. To verify internal validity, sensitivity and specificity were calculated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. To verify external validity, sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cutoff values were assessed in the Organized Registration for the Assessment of dementia on Nationwide General consortium toward Effective treatment (ORANGE) Registry dataset between July 2015 and March 2022, which has multicenter clinical data.Results: A total of 800 (mean age, 77.53 years; men, 50.1%) and 1494 (mean age, 77.97 years; men, 43.3%) participants comprised the NCGG and ORANGE Registry datasets, respectively. The optimum cutoff values for men and women were determined as MMSE < 25 and LI < 5 and MMSE < 25 and LI < 8, respectively; such a combined index showed good discriminative performance in internal (sensitivity/specificity: men, 92.50/73.52; women, 88.57/65.65) and external validities (men, 81.43/77.62; women, 77.64/74.67).Conclusion: The index developed is useful in discriminating between CDR scores of 0.5 and 1 and should be applicable to various settings, such as memory clinics and clinical research.

Diagnostic accuracy of cognitive screening tools validated for older adults in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the diagnostic accuracy of cognitive screening tools validated for older adults in Iran, providing evidence-based recommendations for clinicians and researchers. METHODS: A comprehensive search in March 2023 across Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SID, IranMedex, and IranDoc, enhanced by hand-searching references and Google Scholar, identified cross-sectional studies on cognitive screening in Iranian seniors. We assessed diagnostic accuracy, cognitive domains, and test strengths and weaknesses. A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis provided summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals, illustrated in forest plots. RESULTS: Our review, derived from an initial screening of 38 articles, focused on 17 studies involving 14 cognitive screening tools and participant counts from 60 to 350, mostly from specialized clinics. The MMSE was the only tool examined in at least three studies, prompting a meta-analysis revealing its sensitivity at 0.89 and specificity at 0.77 for dementia detection, albeit amidst significant heterogeneity (I^2 > 80%). ACE-III demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for MCI and dementia, while MoCA's performance was deemed adequate for MCI and excellent for dementia. High bias risk in studies limits interpretation. CONCLUSION: This review identifies key cognitive tools for dementia and MCI in Iranian older adults, tailored to educational levels for use in primary and specialized care. It emphasizes the need for further validation to enhance diagnostic precision across diverse settings, within a concise framework prioritizing brevity and accuracy for clinical applicability.

Longitudinal Feasibility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in Non-Demented ALS Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed at testing the longitudinal feasibility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in an Italian cohort of non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. METHODS: N = 39 non-demented ALS patients were followed-up at a 5-to-10-month interval (M = 6.8; SD = 1.4) with the MoCA and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Practice effects, test-retest reliability, and predictive validity (against follow-up ECAS scores) were assessed. Reliable change indices (RCIs) were derived via a regression-based approach by accounting for retest interval and baseline confounders (i.e., demographics, disease duration, and severity and progression rate). RESULTS: At retest, 100% and 69.2% of patients completed the ECAS and the MoCA, respectively. Patients who could not complete the MoCA showed a slightly more severe and fast-progressing disease. The MoCA was not subject to practice effects (t[32] = -0.80; p = 0.429) and was reliable at retest (intra-class correlation = 0.82). Moreover, baseline MoCA scores predicted the ECAS at retest. RCIs were successfully derived - with baseline MoCA scores being the only significant predictor of retest performances (ps < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As long as motor disabilities do not undermine its applicability, the MoCA appears to be longitudinally feasible at a 5-to-10-month interval in non-demented ALS patients. However, ALS-specific screeners - such as the ECAS - should be preferred whenever possible.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) XpressO: Validation of a digital self-administered cognitive prescreening tool.

BACKGROUND: The need for cognitive testing is increasing with the aging population and the advent of new Alzheimer disease therapies. To respond to the increased demand, the XpressO was developed as a self-administered digital cognitive prescreening tool that will help distinguish between populations of subjective and objective cognitive impairment according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). METHODS: This is a prospective validation study. XpressO is composed of tasks that assess memory and executive functions. It is validated compared to the digital MoCA as a gold standard. Out of 118 participants screened from the MoCA Clinic and a family practice clinic, 88 met inclusion criteria, two participants had missing data due to incomplete tasks, 86 participants were included in the analysis; the mean age was 70.34 years. A logistic regression model was built, and its accuracy was evaluated by the sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic. RESULTS: Analysis showed strong correlation between (1) XpressO memory tasks scores and the MoCA Memory Index Score (p-values < 0.001), and between (2) XpressO sub-test scores and MoCA total score (p-values < 0.005). The AUC for predicting MoCA performance is 0.845. To classify individuals with normal and abnormal MoCA scores, two threshold values were introduced for the total XpressO scores: sensitivity of 91% at a cutoff of 72, specificity of 90% at a cutoff of 42, and an undetermined range in between. CONCLUSION: XpressO demonstrated high AUC, high sensitivity and specificity to predict cognitive performance compared to the digital MoCA. It may provide efficient cognitive prescreening by identifying individuals who would benefit from further clinical assessments, potentially reducing waiting times and high burden on healthcare clinics.

Psychometrics and diagnostics of the Italian version of the Alternate Verbal Fluency Battery (AVFB) in non-demented Parkinson's disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Verbal fluency (VF) tasks are known as suitable for detecting cognitive impairment (CI) in Parkinson's disease (PD). This study thus aimed to evaluate the psychometrics and diagnostics of the Alternate Verbal Fluency Battery (AVFB) by Costa et al. (2014) in an Italian cohort of non-demented PD patients, as well as to derive disease-specific cut-offs for it. METHODS: N = 192 non-demented PD patients were screened with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and underwent the AVFB-which includes phonemic, semantic and alternate VF tests (PVF; SVF; AVF), as well as a Composite Shifting Index (CSI) reflecting the "cost" of shifting from a single- to a double-cued VF task. Construct validity and diagnostics were assessed for each AVFB measure against the MoCA. Internal reliability and factorial validity were also tested. RESULTS: The MoCA proved to be strongly associated with PVF, SVF and AVF scores, whilst moderately with the CSI. The AVFB was internally consistent and underpinned by a single component; however, an improvement in both internal reliability and fit to its factorial structure was observed when dropping the CSI. Demographically adjusted scores on PVF, SVF and AVF tests were diagnostically sound in detecting MoCA-defined cognitive impairment, whilst this was not true for the CSI. Disease-specific cut-offs for PVF, SVF and AVF tests were derived. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, PVF, SVF and AVF tests are reliable, valid and diagnostically sound instruments to detect cognitive impairment in non-demented PD patients and are therefore recommended for use in clinical practice and research.

Evidence of validity and reliability of the Colombian version of Addenbroke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R).

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to provide evidence that supports the validity and reliability of the Colombian version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R) in comparison to the MMSE at assessing and finding patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Additionally, the study aims to determine the optimal cut-off scores based on the age of a population with a low education level. METHOD: This study included 314 individuals (235 participants diagnosed with MCI and 79 cognitively healthy) who live in two different rural departments (states) in Colombia. The participants were recruited for this study through community clubs for the older adults. Most of the individuals were female (236), the average age was 65.95 years of age (SD= 7.8), and the average education level was of 3.78 years (SD = 1.79). It is important to note that the sample only included people with a maximum of 6 years of schooling. RESULTS: A ROC analysis indicated that the ACE-R is more effective than the MMSE at evaluating and finding MCI individuals within the three groups. The cut-off points for the Under 60 years of age group was 83.50 (sensitivity 0.880% and specificity 0.632%); 61-69 years of age 80.50 (sensitivity 0.714% and specificity 0.677%); and Over 70 years of age was 79.50 (sensitivity 0.750% and specificity 0.659%). The internal consistency analysis with MacDonald's Ω determined reliability indicators ≥70 in the ACE-R, except for the age range of 61 to 69 years. CONCLUSION: The Colombian version of the ACE-R demonstrates to be a valid and reliable global cognitive screening tool. It is effective at discerning MCI individuals from healthy within a group of participants with a low education level.

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist in Patients With Cognitive Impairment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Mild Behavioral Impairment-Checklist (MBI-C) was developed to detect and standardize neuropsychiatric symptoms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the MBI-C. METHODS: The sample of our study consisted of 80 patients with cognitive impairment and a control group with 113 participants whose cognitive impairment was not detected in standard tests. Participants were evaluated with the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), MBI-C and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In the reliability analysis, the Cronbach-alpha value for MBI-C was found to be .810. In the ROC analysis performed with the total MBI-C score, the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as .821 and the cut-off score was determined as 8.5; sensitivity was calculated as .77 and specificity as .83. A strong positive correlation was found between test-retest MBI-C scores (r = .886, P < .0019). A strong positive correlation was found between MBI-C and NPI scores (r = .964, P < .001). MBI-C scores were significantly negatively correlated with MMSE and MoCA scores and positively correlated with GDS-15 scores. The results of our study showed that the Turkish version of the MBI-C is a valid and reliable measurement.

Psychometric reliability, validity, and generalizability of 3MSE scores among American Indian adults: the Strong Heart Study.

OBJECTIVE: Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE) is often used to screen for dementia, but little is known about psychometric validity in American Indians. METHODS: We recruited 818 American Indians aged 65-95 for 3MSE examinations in 2010-2013; 403 returned for a repeat examination in 2017-2019. Analyses included standard psychometrics inferences for interpretation, generalizability, and extrapolation: factor analysis; internal consistency-reliability; test-retest score stability; multiple indicator multiple cause structural equation models. RESULTS: This cohort was mean age 73, majority female, mean 12 years education, and majority bilingual. The 4-factor and 2nd-order models fit best, with subfactors for orientation and visuo-construction (OVC), language and executive functioning (LEF), psychomotor and working memory (PMWM), verbal and episodic memory (VEM). Factor structure was supported for both research and clinical interpretation, and factor loadings were moderate to high. Scores were generally consistent over mean 7 years. Younger participants performed better in overall scores, but not in individual factors. Males performed better on OVC and LEF, females better on PMWM. Those with more education performed better on LEF and worse on OVC; the converse was true for bilinguals. All differences were significant, but small. CONCLUSION: These findings support use of 3MSE for individual interpretation in clinic and research among American Indians, with moderate consistency, stability, reliability over time. Observed extrapolations across age, sex, education, and bilingual groups suggest some important contextual differences may exist.

Quality of Life of Elderly People Living in Different Types of Long-term Care Facilities

Abstract Population aging is a worldwide occurrence that has become urgent in developing countries. Quality of life can be measured to identify functional capacity and determine the degree of impact on quality of life exerted on an individual. This study aimed to measure the quality of life of elderly people who have been living in different long-term care facilities for the elderly. Therefore, this research was developed with a qualitative and descriptive approach. Data were obtained from medical records and interviews, and were analyzed in R language interpreter software on the Ubuntu Linux operating system. Seventy-nine elderly people participated in the study. Eleven lived in Home Marista, and 68 lived in Home Jesus Maria José. A socioeconomic questionnaire was used to collect data on the socioeconomic characteristics of the participants. The Mini-Mental State Exam was used to measure degree of cognition. The Short Form-36 Questionnaire was used to measure quality of life. The present study suggests that the results found can clarify the individual vulnerability of the elderly in the age group studied regardless of the type of residence. Despite the discrepancy found regarding the care provided at the long-term care facilities, the scores, obtained with the quality of life assessment, did not show significant differences.

Spanish consortium for ageing normative data (scand): screening tests (mmse, gds-15 and mfe) / Consorcio Español para la Obtención de Datos Normativos del Envejecimiento: Pruebas de Cribado (MMSE, GDS-15 y MFE)

BACKGROUND: Detecting cognitive impairment is a priority for health systems. The aim of this study is to create normative data on screening tests (MMSE, GDS and MFE) for middle-aged and older Spanish adults, considering the effects of sociodemographic factors. METHOD: A total of 2,030 cognitively intact subjects who lived in the community, aged from 50 to 88 years old, participated voluntarily in SCAND consortium studies. The statistical procedure included the conversion of percentile ranges into scalar scores. Secondly, the effects of age, educational level and gender were verified. Linear regressions were used to calculate the scalar adjusted scores. Cut-off values for each test were also calculated. RESULTS: Scalar scores and percentiles corresponding to MMSE, GDS-15 and MFE are shown. An additional table is provided which shows the points that must be added or subtracted from MMSE score depending on the subject's educational level. CONCLUSIONS: The current norms should provide clinically useful data for evaluating Spanish people aged 50 to 88 years old and should contribute to improving the detection of initial symptoms of cognitive impairment in people living in the community, taking into account the influence of gender, age and educational level

ANTECEDENTES: detectar el deterioro cognitivo es una prioridad del sistema sanitario. El objetivo de este estudio es la presentación de datos normativos de pruebas de cribado (MMSE, GDS y MFE) para adultos españoles de mediana edad y adultos mayores, considerando los efectos de factores sociodemográficos. MÉTODO: en los estudios realizados por el consorcio SCAND participaron voluntariamente 2.030 personas cognitivamente sanas, de 50 a 88 años, residentes en su comunidad. El procedimiento estadístico supuso la conversión de rangos percentiles en puntuaciones escalares. Posteriormente, se comprobaron los efectos de la edad, el nivel educativo y el género. Se utilizaron regresiones lineales para calcular las puntuaciones escalares ajustadas. También se calcularon los puntos de corte para cada prueba. RESULTADOS: se muestran las puntuaciones escalares y los percentiles correspondientes a MMSE, GDS-15 y MFE. Además, se presenta una tabla que muestra los puntos que deben sumarse o restarse a la puntuación del MMSE dependiendo del nivel educativo del individuo. CONCLUSIONES: los datos normativos presentados tienen una utilidad clínica para evaluar a población española de 50 a 88 años, y contribuyen a mejorar la detección de los síntomas iniciales del deterioro cognitivo teniendo en cuenta la influencia del género, la edad y el nivel educativo

Validación argentino-chilena de la versión en español del test Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III para el diagnóstico de demencia / Argentinian/Chilean validation of the Spanish-language version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III for diagnosing dementia

INTRODUCCIÓN: El Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) es una adaptación del test de cribado ACE, la cual ha demostrado tener una alta sensibilidad y especificidad para detectar disfunción cognitiva en pacientes con demencia y otras patologías neurológicas y psiquiátricas. Si bien el ACE-III ya ha sido validado en castellano (España), este no ha sido validado en Latinoamérica. El objetivo del presente estudio fue validar el ACE-III en una población argentina y chilena. MÉTODOS: Se evaluó un grupo de pacientes con enfermedad de Alzheimer (n = 70), un grupo de pacientes con la variante conductual de la demencia frontotemporal (n = 31) y un grupo control (n = 139) con la versión en español del ACE-III; reclutados en centros médicos de ambos países. RESULTADOS: La versión argentina-chilena del ACE-III presentó una buena consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach = 0,87). Se hallaron diferencias significativas en los valores totales del ACE-III entre el grupo control y el grupo de demencias (p < 0,05) y entre ambos grupos de demencia (p < 0,05). Con un punto de corte de 86, el 98,6% de los pacientes con DTA, el 83,9% de pacientes con variante conductual de la demencia frontotemporal y el 84,2% de los controles fue correctamente clasificado. CONCLUSIONES: El presente estudio ha demostrado que el ACE-III continúa siendo una herramienta útil para la detección de la disfunción cognitiva en la demencia

BACKGROUND: The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III), an adaptation of the ACE cognitive screening test, has been demonstrated to have high sensitivity and specificity in detecting cognitive impairment in patients with dementia and other neurological and psychiatric disorders. Although the Spanish-language version of the ACE-III has already been validated in Spain, it is yet to be validated in Latin America. The aim of this study was to validate the ACE-III test in an Argentinean and Chilean population. METHODS: ACE-III was administered to 70 patients with Alzheimer disease, 31 patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, and a control group of 139 healthy volunteers. Participants were recruited at centres in both countries. RESULTS: The Spanish-language version of ACE-III was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). We found significant differences in total ACE-III scores between patients with Alzheimer disease and controls (p < .05) and between patients with Alzheimer disease and bvFTD (p < .05). With a cut-off point of 86, 98.6% of AD patients, 83.9% of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia patients, and 84.2% of controls were correctly classified. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the Spanish-language version of ACE-III continues to be an effective tool for detecting cognitive dysfunction in patients with dementia

MoCA Test: normative and diagnostic accuracy data for seniors with heterogeneous educational levels in Brazil / Teste MoCA: dados normativos e de acurácia diagnóstica para idosos com níveis educacionais heterogêneos no Brasil

ABSTRACT The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been described as a good tool to detect cognitive impairment. The ideal MoCA cutoff score is still under debate. The aim was to provide MoCA norms and accuracy data for seniors with a lower education level, including illiterates. Methods: Data originated from an epidemiological study conducted in the municipality of Tremembe, Brazil. The Brazilian MoCA test was applied as part of the cognitive assessment in all participants. Of the 630 participants, 385 were classified as cognitively normal (CN) and were included in the normative data set, 110 individuals were diagnosed with dementia and 135 were classified as having cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND). Results: The total scores varied significantly according to age and education among the three diagnostic groups: CN, CIND and dementia (p < 0.001). To distinguish participants with CN from dementia, the best MoCA cutoff was 15 points (sensitivity 90%, specificity 77%) and to differentiate those with CN from CIND, the MoCA cutoff was 19 points (sensitivity 84%, specificity 49%). Those scores varied according to education level. Conclusions: The MoCA test did not have a high accuracy for detecting CIND in the population with a low educational level. Nevertheless, this tool may be used to detect dementia, especially in individuals with more than five years of education, if a lower cutoff score is adopted.

RESUMO O Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) foi descrito como uma boa ferramenta para detectar comprometimento cognitivo. A nota de corte ideal do MoCA ainda está em debate. O objetivo é fornecer normas do MoCA e dados de acurácia para idosos dentro de uma faixa educacional mais baixa, incluindo analfabetos. Métodos: Os dados foram provenientes do estudo epidemiológico realizado no município de Tremembé, Brasil. A versão brasileira do MoCA foi aplicada como parte da avaliação cognitiva em todos os participantes. Dos 630 participantes, 385 foram classificados como cognitivamente normais (CN) e foram incluídos no conjunto de dados normativos, 110 indivíduos foram diagnosticados com demência e 135 foram classificados como tendo comprometimento cognitivo sem demência (CCSD). Resultados: Os escores totais variaram significativamente de acordo com a idade e escolaridade entre os três grupos diagnósticos: CN, CCSD e demência (p < 0,001). Para distinguir CN de demência, a melhor nota de corte do MoCA foi de 15 pontos (sensibilidade 90%, especificidade 77%) e para diferenciar o grupo CN de CCSD, a nota de corte do MoCA foi de 19 pontos (sensibilidade 84%, especificidade 49%). Essas notas de corte variaram conforme o nível de escolaridade. Conclusões: O teste MoCA não teve alta acurácia para detectar CCSD nesta população de baixa escolaridade. No entanto, esta ferramenta poderia ser usada para detectar demência, especialmente em indivíduos com mais de 5 anos de escolaridade, se uma menor nota de corte fosse adotada.

Validación del instrumento Montreal Cognitive Assessment en español en adultos mayores de 60 años / Validation of the Spanish-language version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test in adults older than 60 years

Introducción: Existen pocas validaciones de la versión en español de la prueba Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-S) en Latinoamérica. Objetivo: Evaluar las propiedades psicométricas y la validez discriminativa del MoCA-S en adultos mayores de Santiago de Chile. Métodos: Ciento setenta y dos individuos agrupados según diagnóstico clínico basado en Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) en: deterioro cognitivo leve tipo amnésico (DCL-a, n = 24), DCL no-amnésico (DCL-na, n = 24), demencia leve (n = 20) y 104 cognitivamente sanos fueron evaluados con el MoCA-S y Mini-Mental test de Folstein (MMSE) como prueba de contraste, para determinar la validez discriminativa del MoCA-S. Resultados: Los promedios ± desviación estándar de edad y escolaridad fueron 73 ± 6 y 11 ± 4, respectivamente, sin diferencias significativas entre los grupos. La consistencia interna fue buena (alfa de Cronbach 0,772), la fiabilidad interevaluador muy buena (coeficiente de correlación de Spearman 0,846 [p < 0,01]) y la fiabilidad intraevaluador (test-retest) fue 0,922 bilateral (p < 0,001). La prueba fue eficaz y válida para la detección del DCL-a (ABC = 0,903) y demencia leve (ABC = 0,957); menos eficaz en DCL no-a (ABC = 0,629). El punto de corte de mejor rendimiento para DCL-a fue < 21 y para demencia leve < 20; sensibilidad/especificidad de 75/82% y 90/86%, respectivamente. La escolaridad mostró una importante influencia en el puntaje, por ello se adicionaron 2 puntos para escolaridad < 8 años y un punto para escolaridad entre 8 y 12 años (MoCA-S1-2). El MoCA-S1-2 fue significativamente más discriminativo que el MMSE para diferenciar DCL-a y demencia. Conclusiones: El MoCA-S1-2 es una prueba breve, de fácil administración y útil para el diagnóstico de DCL-a y demencia leve

Introduction: Few studies have validated the Spanish-language version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-S) test in Latin American populations. Objetive: To evaluate the psychometric properties and discriminant validity of the MoCA-S in elderly patients in Santiago de Chile. Methods: 172 individuals were grouped according to their clinical diagnosis based on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale as follows: amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI; n ± 24), non-amnestic MCI (naMCI; n ± 24), mild dementia (n ± 20), and cognitively normal (n ± 104). Participants were evaluated with both the MoCA-S and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to determine the discriminant validity of the MoCA-S. Results: Mean age and years of schooling were 73 ± 6 and 11 ± 4 years, respectively, with no significant intergroup differences. The MoCA-S displayed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alfa: 0.772), high inter-rater reliability (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.846; P < .01), and high intra-rater reliability (test-retest reliability coefficient: 0.922; P < .001). The MoCA-S was found to be an effective and valid test for detecting aMCI (AUC ± 0.903) and mild dementia (AUC ± 0.957); its effectiveness for detecting naMCI was lower (AUC ± 0.629). The optimal cut-off points for aMCI and mild dementia were < 21 and < 20, respectively, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 75% and 82% for aMCI and 90% and 86% for mild dementia. The level of education had a great impact on scores: as a result, 2 points were added for patients with less than 8 years of schooling and one point for patients with 8-12 years of schooling (MoCA-S1-2). The MoCA-S1-2 showed significantly greater discriminant validity than the MMSE for differentiating aMCI from dementia. Conclusions: The MoCA-S1-2 is a short, easy-to-use, and useful test for diagnosing aMCI and mild dementia

Desempenho cognitivo através do mini-exame do estado mental na distrofia muscular de Duchenne / Cognitive performance by mini mental state examination in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

OBJETIVO: A distrofia muscular de Duchenne (DMD) é frequentemente associada à deficiência intelectual (DI) e ao prejuízo de funções superiores como leitura, raciocínio, lógica, e memória. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o desempenho cognitivo de pacientes com DMD através do Mini-Exame do Estado Mental (MEEM), um teste simples e rápido, usado como primeiro rastreio intelectual, principalmente quando baterias psicométricas complexas, dependentes de psicólogos especializados, não estão disponíveis. MÉTODO: Foi realizado um estudo observacional de trinta e quatro meninos com DMD, com idades entre 8 e 22 anos, separados em dois grupos de acordo com a presença de DI moderada-grave, conforme a definição clínica do funcionamento adaptativo do Manual Estatístico e Diagnóstico de Desordens Mentais 5º edição (DSM-5). Foram avaliados a pontuação no MEEM, marcos do desenvolvimento, independência nas atividades de vida cotidiana e capacidade de alfabetização. RESULTADOS: Os marcos motores e de linguagem estavam atrasados (16 meses), e a média no MEEM foi 21, ponto de corte mais baixo do que verificado em pares da mesma idade. O grupo com DI moderada-grave apresentou uma média de 12 no MEEM, e os subtestes de orientação, atenção e cálculo e linguagem foram os que demonstraram piores desempenhos. O ponto de corte de maior acurácia para distinguir DI moderada-grave nos pacientes com DMD foi 21. CONCLUSÃO: O MEEM apresentou adequada sensibilidade (100%) e especificidade (90%) para o ponto de corte de 21, revelando-se um bom método de triagem cognitiva para DI moderada-grave na DMD.

BACKGROUND: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is often associated with intellectual disability (ID) and with impairment of higher mental functions as reading, learning, logical thinking and memory. The goal of this study was evaluate the cognitive performance of DMD patients by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), first bedside screening test, widely used in pediatrics, when neuropsychologic batteries, dependent on specialized psychologists, are not easily available in public health system. METHODS: An observational study of thirty-four boys with DMD, aged 8-22 years, was performed, spliting this group into two sub-groups, according to the presence of moderate-severe, defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) adaptative functioning clinical criteria. The MMSE scores, developmental milestones, independence in daily life activities and literacy skills were evaluated. RESULTS: Motor and language milestones were reached with 16 months, later than usual and mean on MMSE was 21, lower than in healthy pairs. In assessment by groups, patients with moderate-severe intellectual disability presented a performance in total MMSE (12) and orientation, attention/calculation and language MMSE subtests lower than patients without ID. The most accurate cutoff value on MMSE to distinguish moderate-severe intellectual disability in DMD patients was 21. CONCLUSION: This study has shown adequate sensitivity and specificity of the MMSE for detection of moderate-severe intellectual disability, with almost 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity for cutoff values of 21 points in DMD.

Accuracy of praxis test from Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) for Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Praxis impairment may be one of the first symptoms manifested in dementia, primarily in cortical dementia. The Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) evaluates praxis, but little is known about the accuracy of CAMCOG for diagnosing dementia. The aims here were to investigate the accuracy of praxis and its subitems in CAMCOG (constructive, ideomotor and ideational subitems) for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) among elderly patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study on community-dwelling elderly people. METHODS: 158 elderly patients were evaluated. CAMCOG, Mini-Mental State Examination and Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire were used. ROC curve analysis was used to establish cutoff points. RESULTS: The total scores for praxis and the constructive subitem presented significant differences (P < 0.0001) between healthy elderly people and AD patients. Stage of dementia (clinical dementia rating, CDR = 0, 1 and 2) showed that total and constructive praxis can be used to classify the stages of dementia (mild and moderate cases), i.e. constructive praxis classified 88% of the patients with mild dementia (P < 0.0001) while total praxis classified 56% with moderate dementia. Comparison of normal controls (NC) and mild dementia cases showed specificity of 71% and sensitivity of 88% (AUC = 0.88; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Some praxis subtests can have higher predictive diagnostic value for detecting Alzheimer's disease in mild stages (total praxis AUC = 0.858; P < 0.0001; constructive AUC = 0.972; P < 0.0001). Constructive praxis as measured using CAMCOG may contribute towards diagnosing dementia, because occurrence of impairment of praxis may help in recognizing an evolving dementia syndrome.

Sistema para el análisis del comportamiento cognitivo en el adulto mayor. Estudio de caso:: Pinar del río, Cuba / System for the analysis of cognitive behavior in the Elderly. Case study: Pinar del río, Cuba

La cantidad de personas que ascienden a la tercera edad aumentó en 700 millones en la década del 90, a nivel mundial. Para el año 2025 se estima que existirán cerca de 2 mil millones de ancianos. El cuidado de su salud reviste vital importancia para todas las sociedades; por ello, en el presente trabajo se propone una herramienta matemático computacional para medir la ejercitación de la atención y la percepción en el ambiente diario del adulto mayor. Ambas funciones poseen una estrecha relación con la capacidad psicológica de la memoria; además, se considera que su afectación puede provocar pérdida de validismo, dependencia y discapacidad, una vez que se ha iniciado el deterioro cognitivo. La propuesta es aplicada en la ciudad de Pinar del Río, Cuba a través de test experimentales y diferentes tipos de análisis mediante medios de cómputo en una muestra de personas de la tercera edad, con una capacidad moderadamente razonable(AU)

The number of old persons increased in 700 millions in the 90's at world level. This number will increase to nearly 2 thousand more million in 2025. The carefulness of their healthy becomes an important issue for all societies; that is why, in this research, it is presented a computational tool to measure the assistance and the perception in the daily environment of the elderly people. Both functions have a close relationship with the psychological capacity of the memory; moreover, it is considered that their damage can provoke loss of skills, dependence and disabilities, once the cognitive deterioration has begun. The proposal is applied in the pinar del río, cuba, through experimental tests and different types of analysis by means of computational in a sample of elderly people with a moderately reasonable capacity(AU)