Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 327
Filter
1.
J Interv Cardiol ; 2020: 8179849, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32684867

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced the rates of in-stent restenosis (ISR) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), DES related ISR (DES-ISR) still occurs and outcomes of DES-ISR remain unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with DES-ISR compared with patients with BMS related ISR (BMS-ISR) after the treatment of DES or drug-eluting balloon (DEB). Methods and results. We searched the literature in the main electronic databases including PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary endpoints were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The secondary endpoints included all cause death (ACD), cardiac death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis or re-in-stent restenosis (ST/RE-ISR), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). A total of 19 studies with 6256 participants were finally included in this meta-analysis. Results showed that the rates of TLR (P < 0.00001), TVR (P < 0.00001), CD (P=0.02), ST/RE-ISR (P < 0.00001), and MACEs (P < 0.00001) were significantly higher in the DES-ISR group than in the BMS-ISR group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in the rates of MI (P=0.05) and ACD (P=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that patients with DES-ISR had worse clinical outcomes at the long-term follow-up than patients with BMS-ISR after the treatment of DES or DEB, suggesting that DES and DEB may be more effective for BMS-ISR than that for DES-ISR. Positive prevention of DES-ISR is indispensable and further studies concentrating on detecting the predictors of outcomes of DES-ISR are required.


Subject(s)
Coronary Restenosis/surgery , Drug-Eluting Stents/adverse effects , Myocardial Ischemia , Myocardial Revascularization , Stents , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Humans , Myocardial Ischemia/mortality , Myocardial Ischemia/surgery , Myocardial Revascularization/adverse effects , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Stents/adverse effects , Stents/classification
4.
J Med Case Rep ; 13(1): 315, 2019 Oct 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31640773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusion revascularization remains a challenging problem because of its complexity. We present a case of a patient with chronic total occlusion who was successfully revascularized with the use of a new device called a real-time intravascular ultrasound double-lumen microcatheter. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old East Asians woman presented to our hospital with a complaint of recurrent chest pain of 5 months' duration. Angiography revealed chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery from the right coronary artery ostium to the ostia of the posterolateral and posterior descending branches. A guidewire was passed to the distal right coronary artery but went into the false lumens at the posterior descending and posterolateral ostia after use of the antegrade and retrograde approaches. Hence, we used the new device to pass through the subintimal right coronary artery space with reentry into the true lumen before the posterior descending and posterolateral ostia. A stent was successfully deployed at the posterior descending and posterolateral ostia, and the final result was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: This device was useful for finding the entry point and for reentry into the true lumen of a chronic total occlusion. It may be a valuable tool for recanalization of complex chronic total occlusion lesions.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheters , Coronary Occlusion/therapy , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Chest Pain/etiology , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Occlusion/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Stents , Ultrasonography, Interventional
6.
Innovations (Phila) ; 14(2): 144-150, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30885086

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The da Vinci Xi surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) cannot give tactile feedback to surgeons. This shortcoming may increase the risk of left internal thoracic artery (LITA) injury during its harvest. We utilized Firefly Fluorescence Imaging (Firefly) to assess LITA quality in robot-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (R-MIDCAB). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records and intraoperative videos of 30 consecutive patients who underwent R-MIDCAB with LITA-left anterior descending (LAD) coronary bypass. All patients had post-harvest assessment of LITA blood flow by Firefly with 1 mL (2.5 mg/mL) of indocyanine green injection through a central line. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the patients were male, mean age was 67.7 ± 10.7 years. In post-harvest assessment performed before transection of the distal LITA, blood flow in LITA was well visualized in 28 patients. In the remaining 2 patients, 1 had dissection and the other had severe spasm of the LITA. Firefly was also useful for locating LITA and LAD and for assessing blood flow of the graft after anastomosis. Time required for each Firefly assessment was approximately 20 seconds. There were no side effects or complications due to Firefly intraoperatively and postoperatively. Twenty-six patients had postoperative coronary computed tomography; LITA patency rate was 100% (26/26). CONCLUSION: Firefly is fast, simple, and effective for locating and assessing flow in LITA and LAD before and after anastomosis in R-MIDCAB.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Vessels/surgery , Internal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis/methods , Mammary Arteries/transplantation , Aged , Anastomosis, Surgical , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Mammary Arteries/surgery , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Optical Imaging/methods , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Robotics
7.
Perfusion ; 34(3): 217-224, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30394847

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The positive impact of minimally invasive extracorporeal circuits (MiECC) on patient outcome is expected to be most evident in patients with limited physiologic reserves. Nevertheless, most studies have limited their use to low-risk patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. As such, there is little evidence to their benefit outside this patient population. We, therefore, set out to explore their potential benefit in octogenarians undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with or without concomitant myocardial revascularization. METHODS: Based on the type of the utilized ECC, we performed a retrospective propensity score-matched comparison among all octogenarians (n = 218) who received a primary AVR with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in our institution between 2003 and 2010. RESULTS: A MiECC was utilized in 32% of the patients. The propensity score matching yielded 52 matched pairs. The 30-day postoperative mortality (2% vs. 10%; p=0.2), the incidence of low cardiac output (0% vs. 6%; p=0.2) and the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay (2.5 ± 2.6 vs. 3.8 ± 4.7 days; p=0.06) were all in favour of the MiECC group, but failed to reach statistical significance while the 90-day postoperative mortality did (2% vs. 16%; p=0.02). CONCLUSION: MiECCs have a positive influence on the outcome of octogenarians undergoing AVR with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Their use should, therefore, be extended beyond isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Myocardial Revascularization , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Artery Bypass/instrumentation , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Equipment Design , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
9.
Int Heart J ; 59(5): 935-940, 2018 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30101849

ABSTRACT

Increasing evidence is available for the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in selected patients with unprotected left main (LM) bifurcation coronary lesions. However, little data have been reported on recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) for LM bifurcation lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a drug-eluting balloon (DEB) for LM bifurcation ISR compared with that of a drug-eluting stent (DES).Between December 2011 and December 2015, 104 patients who underwent PCI for unprotected LM bifurcation ISR were enrolled. We separated the patients into 2 groups: (1) those underwent PCI with further DEB and (2) those underwent PCI with further DES. Clinical outcomes were analyzed.Patients' average age was 67.14 ± 7.65 years, and the percentage of male patients was 76.0%. A total of 75 patients were enrolled in the DEB group, and another 29 patients were enrolled in the DES group. Similar target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) rate were noted for both groups. A significantly higher cardiovascular mortality rate was found in the DES group (10.7% versus 0%, P = 0.020), and a higher all-cause mortality rate was noted in the DES group (21.4% versus 6.8%, P = 0.067).It is feasible to use DEB for LM bifurcation ISR. When comparing DEB with DES, similar TLR rates were found, but lower recurrent MI and lower cardiovascular death were noted for DEB treatment.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Restenosis/surgery , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Drug-Eluting Stents/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Aged , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/pathology , Coronary Restenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Restenosis/pathology , Coronary Vessels/anatomy & histology , Coronary Vessels/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
10.
Can J Cardiol ; 34(5): 653-664, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29731024

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is characterized by extensive atherosclerosis, longer lesions, and diffuse distal disease. Consequently, these patients have worse outcomes after coronary revascularization, regardless of the modality used. Traditionally, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been regarded as more effective than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with DM, likely because of more complete revascularization and protection against disease progression in the bypass segment. Revascularization with balloon angioplasty, bare-metal stents, and first-generation drug-eluting stents have all been shown to be inferior to CABG in patients with DM. Current professional society guidelines reflect these findings, strongly recommending CABG over PCI in this setting. Newer stent platforms, however, have challenged this notion. The use of thinner struts, biocompatible polymer coating, and newer antiproliferative agents have improved the rates of cardiovascular events in patients with DM revascularized percutaneously. Since the publication of current guidelines, new studies suggested acceptable outcomes in patients with DM revascularized with second-generation drug-eluting stents, even though these conclusions are drawn from small subgroup analyses or nonrandomized studies. Robust registry data suggest similar mortality with lower rates of stroke after PCI compared with surgery, at the expense of increased rates of repeat revascularization. If complete revascularization can be achieved, similar rates of myocardial infarction are also observed. Therefore, contemporary revascularization in patients with DM with multivessel coronary artery disease should involve a multidisciplinary approach, in which interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons involve their patients to individualize treatment choices, and balance the risks and effectiveness of each modality.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Coronary Artery Disease , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Drug-Eluting Stents/classification , Myocardial Revascularization , Postoperative Complications , Comorbidity , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Humans , Myocardial Revascularization/adverse effects , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Myocardial Revascularization/standards , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Adjustment
11.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 71(6): 432-439, 2018 Jun.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29128364

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There is little evidence on the optimal strategy for bifurcation lesions in the context of a coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO). This study compared the procedural and mid-term outcomes of patients with bifurcation lesions in CTO treated with provisional stenting vs 2-stent techniques in a multicenter registry. METHODS: Between January 2012 and June 2016, 922 CTO were recanalized at the 4 participating centers. Of these, 238 (25.8%) with a bifurcation lesion (side branch ≥ 2mm located proximally, distally, or within the occluded segment) were treated by a simple approach (n=201) or complex strategy (n=37). Propensity score matching was performed to account for selection bias between the 2 groups. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) consisted of a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: Angiographic and procedural success were similar in the simple and complex groups (94.5% vs 97.3%; P=.48 and 85.6% vs 81.1%; P=.49). However, contrast volume, radiation dose, and fluoroscopy time were lower with the simple approach. At follow-up (25 months), the MACE rate was 8% in the simple and 10.8% in the complex group (P=.58). There was a trend toward a lower MACE-free survival in the complex group (80.1% vs 69.8%; P=.08). After propensity analysis, there were no differences between the groups regarding immediate and follow-up results. CONCLUSIONS: Bifurcation lesions in CTO can be approached similarly to regular bifurcation lesions, for which provisional stenting is considered the technique of choice. After propensity score matching, there were no differences in procedural or mid-term clinical outcomes between the simple and complex strategies.


Subject(s)
Coronary Occlusion/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Stents , Chronic Disease , Coronary Angiography/mortality , Coronary Occlusion/mortality , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Fluoroscopy/mortality , Fluoroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Myocardial Revascularization/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Radiation Dosage , Treatment Outcome
13.
Innovations (Phila) ; 12(5): 370-374, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29023352

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Sternal bleeding during cardiac surgery is currently controlled using bone wax or other chemical substances that may result in adverse effects and affect wound healing and recovery. The purpose of this study was to identify a safe, cost-effective, and easy-to-use technique to reduce sternal bleeding and sternal trauma during cardiac surgery. METHODS: After sternotomy, a sternal protection device was placed over each hemisternal section before insertion of the retractor and remained in situ until the end of surgery. Sternal bleeding and ease of use were assessed and recorded during surgery. Sternal trauma was assessed and recorded within 5 minutes of removal of the device, and overall satisfaction (Global Impression) and any intraoperative adverse events or device malfunction were reported at surgery completion. Patients were followed up 24 hours and 4 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the study. Adverse events reported were not considered related to the device. No sternal trauma was identified in any patient. In 9 of 11 patients, sternal bleeding was reduced after insertion of the device. The device was generally considered easy to use, although some difficulty was encountered when used with the Internal Mammary Artery retractor. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the device is safe and able to reduce sternal bleeding during surgery using sternal retractors. We recommend further studies in a larger population of patients with a control group to evaluate the device's ability to reduce the morbidity associated with sternal bleeding and sternal trauma.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Protective Devices/standards , Sternotomy/instrumentation , Sternum/surgery , Aged , Aortic Valve/surgery , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Mammary Arteries/surgery , Middle Aged , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Palmitates/adverse effects , Palmitates/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Sternotomy/methods , Stress, Mechanical , Surgical Instruments/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Waxes/adverse effects , Waxes/therapeutic use , Wound Healing
15.
Hellenic J Cardiol ; 58(3): 178-189, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28212871

ABSTRACT

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) and have an increased incidence of recurrent events following revascularization. Choosing the most appropriate strategy to revascularize these high-risk patients is crucial for improving the clinical outcomes. Several studies, randomized trials and meta-analyses have compared short- and long-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients suffering from CAD. The aim of this article is to review the currently available evidence on the role of PCI and CABG in the management of diabetic patients with CAD.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Myocardial Ischemia/surgery , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Myocardial Ischemia/complications , Myocardial Ischemia/epidemiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
16.
Panminerva Med ; 59(1): 47-66, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27759734

ABSTRACT

Despite permanent improvement in success rate and technical developments, chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains undertreated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Dedicated CTO operators from Japan, Europe and USA perform these procedures with success rate beyond 90%, but there is still huge gap between this group of specialists and broader population of PCI operators. Recently proposed CTO scores can be used for patients' selection according to the CTO operators' experience. Patients with low CTO Score values may be suitable for less experienced operators at the beginning of the CTO PCI learning curve, while more complex CTOs (higher CTO Score values) should be differed to CTO experts. As most of CTO scores better predict antegrade procedural success, at the hands of expert CTO operators, lower or intermediate CTO Score values suggest cases which could be started by anterograde techniques. In this paper we review: 1) an impact of CTO on completeness of revascularization; 2) appropriate CTO equipment setting; 3) procedure planning aspects, including the use of computed tomography angiography and CTO scores; 4) current CTO techniques classifying them into A) antegrade, B) retrograde and C) hybrid approach. Further advancements in CTO PCI should not only provide higher rate of complete revascularization, with improved clinical outcome, but also simplify procedure and make it suitable for broader spectrum of interventionalists.


Subject(s)
Coronary Occlusion/therapy , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Catheterization , Catheters , Computed Tomography Angiography , Europe , Femoral Artery/pathology , Humans , Japan , Learning Curve , Risk , Treatment Outcome , United States
17.
Herz ; 41(7): 562-565, 2016 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27596003

ABSTRACT

The heart team, consisting of conservative cardiologists, cardiac surgeons and interventional cardiologists, is important for a balanced, multidisciplinary decision-making process for patients suffering from coronary artery disease (CAD). Standard evidence-based, interdisciplinary, institutional protocols can be used for commonly encountered case scenarios to avoid the need for a systematic case by case review. Complex cases with a SYNTAX score of more than 32, diabetes mellitus and lesions of the left main stem or three-vessel disease should in general not be treated by an ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but first discussed in the heart team. Culprit lesion PCI is usually the first choice in most patients with acute coronary syndrome. If complete percutaneous revascularization is not possible, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) should be considered by the heart team. In patients assigned for CABG, timing of the procedure should be decided on an individual basis, depending on the symptoms, hemodynamic stability, coronary anatomy and signs of ischemia. In stabilized patients with acute coronary syndrome, the choice of revascularization modality can be made in analogy to patients with stable CAD.


Subject(s)
Cardiology/standards , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Myocardial Revascularization/standards , Patient Care Team/standards , Preoperative Care/standards , Europe , Humans , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Patient Selection
19.
Herz ; 41(7): 585-590, 2016 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27484494

ABSTRACT

Chronic occlusion of coronary arteries also known as chronic total occlusions (CTO) are found in approximately 20 % of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and in approximately 50 % of patients after coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). As a result of technical advancements in retrograde recanalization techniques specialized centers can now achieve success rates of over 85 %, regardless of the CTO anatomy. Given the complexity of retrograde CTO techniques, a consensus paper issued by the Euro CTO Club requires interventional cardiologists to have sufficient experience in antegrade approaches (>300 antegrade CTO cases and >50 per year) with an additional training program (25 retrograde cases each as first and second operating surgeon) before becoming a qualified independent retrograde surgeon. The increased investment in time and technical resources can only be justified if the patient has a clear clinical benefit. This technical advancement and the progressively clearer evidence that complete revascularization can be achieved in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease have attracted growing interest in recent years from interventional cardiologists in the recanalization of CTO.


Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis/standards , Coronary Stenosis/diagnosis , Coronary Stenosis/surgery , Myocardial Revascularization/standards , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Cardiology/standards , Chronic Disease , Germany , Humans , Myocardial Revascularization/instrumentation , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Stents/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...