Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Before Extubation on Emergence Delirium after Nasal Surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of single dose of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) in reducing the incidence and severity of postoperative emergence delirium (EmD). STUDY DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 1st December 2022 to 30th March 2023. METHODOLOGY: Patients, aged between 18-65 years, with ASA 1-3 scheduled to undergo nasal surgeries under general anaesthesia, were inducted in the study. Exclusion criteria were patient refusal, later request for removal from the study, inability to give consent, known allergy to dexmedetomidine, body mass index (BMI) more than 35, history of obstructive sleep apnoea, history of psychiatric illness, pregnancy, and presence of liver and renal diseases. The primary outcome measure of the study was the incidence of emergence delirium in the postoperative period. RESULTS: The frequency of EmD after nasal surgery was 52.38% in the control group compared to 14.28% in the dexmedetomidine group (p = 0.01). Pain scores were not statistically different between the two groups. The duration of post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) stay was significantly lesser in dexmedetomidine group (p <0.001). The satisfaction score on the visual analogue scale (VAS) was also found to be higher in patients who received intravenous dexmedetomidine (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of single dose dexmedetomidine before extubation in nasal surgeries reduces the EmD and improves patient satisfaction. KEY WORDS: Dexmedetomidine, Emergence delirium, Nasal surgery, Opioid consumption, Pain control.

The effect of deep and awake extubation on emergence agitation after nasal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Post-anesthetic emergence agitation is common after general anesthesia and may cause adverse consequences, such as injury as well as respiratory and circulatory complications. Emergence agitation after general anesthesia occurs more frequently in nasal surgery than in other surgical procedures. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of emergence agitation in patients undergoing nasal surgery who were extubated under deep anesthesia or when fully awake. METHODS: A total of 202 patients (18-60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification: I-II) undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia were randomized 1:1 into two groups: a deep extubation group (group D) and an awake extubation group (group A). The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence agitation. The secondary outcomes included number of emergence agitations, sedation score, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: The incidence of emergence agitation was lower in group D than in group A (34.7% vs. 72.8%; p < 0.001). Compared to group A, patients in group D had lower Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores, higher Ramsay sedation scores, fewer agitation episodes, and lower mean arterial pressure when extubated and 30 min after surgery, whereas these indicators did not differ 90 min after surgery. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Extubation under deep anesthesia can significantly reduce emergence agitation after nasal surgery under general anesthesia without increasing the incidence of adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04844333) on 14/04/2021.

A 3-year follow-up study after nasal reconstruction surgery in patients with empty nose syndrome.

KEY POINTS: Empty nose syndrome (ENS) is characterized by a patent nasal airway and a sense of nasal obstruction. ENS and psychological symptoms improved after surgery and remained stable for up to three years. Identifying residual disease is necessary for enhancing therapeutic outcomes in ENS patients.

Tranexamic acid in bleeding reduction and operative time of nasal surgeries: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Our study goal is to review the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and operative time in nasal surgeries. METHODS: We included randomized clinical trials using oral or intravenous tranexamic acid, excluded non-randomized studies, topic administration, coagulopathy, and using other drugs interfering in the coagulation cascade. Online databases, National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE-PubMED), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (Lilacs), Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar were used to perform the search. The review was registered in PROSPERO by no CRD42022310977. Two authors, independently, selected the articles meeting the inclusion criteria. They extracted the data and used RevMan 5 software to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Our search resulted in 16 RCTs that were included in the meta-analysis totalizing 1108 patients. Studies were evaluated resulting in a low risk of bias for the five domains. The use of tranexamic acid resulted in significant reduction in duration of surgery (DOS) and intraoperative blood loss (IBL) had significant reduction. The level of evidence according to GRADE System was high in all studies and variables. CONCLUSION: Tranexamic acid has an important role in reducing intraoperative blood loss and duration of surgery. Our study has some limitations due to the low number of RCTs available in the literature.

A case report: A patient rescued by VA-ECMO after cardiac arrest triggered by trigeminocardiac reflex after nasal surgery.

RATIONALE: Cardiac arrest (CA) caused by trigeminocardiac reflex (TCR) after endoscopic nasal surgery is rare. Hence, when a patient suffers from TCR induced CA in the recovery room, most doctors may not be able to find the cause in a short time, and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation measures may not be effective. Providing circulatory assistance through venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can help healthcare providers gain time to identify the etiology and initiate symptom-specific treatment. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a rare case of CA after endoscopic nasal surgery treated with VA-ECMO. DIAGNOSES: We excluded myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, allergies, hypoxia, and electrolyte abnormalities based on the relevant examination results. Following a multidisciplinary consultation, clinical manifestation and a review of previous literature, we reasoned that the CA was due to TCR. INTERVENTIONS: VA-ECMO was established to resuscitate the patient successfully during effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation. OUTCOMES: ECMO was successfully evacuated a period of 190 minutes of therapy. The patient was discharged home on day 8. LESSONS: TCR is notable during endoscopic nasal surgery. Our case indicates that CA in operating room is worth prolonged CCPR. The ideal time for ECPR implementation should not be limited within 20 minutes after CCPR.

Platelet-rich plasma injection for empty nose syndrome: A case report.

Empty nose syndrome (ENS) is a relatively rare disease found in patients who have undergone sinonasal surgery, characterized by excessive reduction of the turbinate, causing intranasal turbulence and loss of receptors within the nasal mucosa. Patients diagnosed with the disease usually experience symptoms including dryness of the nose, nasal pain, paradoxical nasal obstruction, and crusts in the nasal cavity. ENS can be treated with conservative care such as nasal irrigation or nasal moisturizers. Accurate efficacy of surgical treatment of ENS is often difficult to predict and is accompanied by operational obstacles and complications. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has recently gained attention as a regenerative therapy in several medical fields. We present two cases of ENS treated by injection of PRP as a simple and less invasive method, and describe its efficacy with nasal endoscopy and subjective questionnaires.

Unusual Causes of Nasal Septal Abscess Including a COVID-19 Swab Test After Nasal Surgery.

A nasal septal abscess is a rare lesion that usually results from a nasal septal hematoma after nasal trauma or surgery, although it can occur unexpectedly. Nasal septal abscesses should be prevented and treated immediately. The authors describe 2 unusual cases: 1 caused by sudden loosening of the quilting suture of the nasal septum and the other by a nasopharyngeal swab test for coronavirus disease-2019. The authors also provide an intraoperative video and a literature review.

Changes in symptoms of Eustachian tube dysfunction after nasal surgery.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of nasal surgery including endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and/or septoplasty on Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) symptoms using the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire 7 (ETDQ-7). METHODS: Patients who underwent ESS and/or septoplasty between April 2020 and October 2021 were retrospective reviewed. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of surgery: group A, septoplasty alone (76 patients); group B, ESS alone (209 patients); and group C, septoplasty + ESS (74 patients). Responses to the ETDQ-7, SNOT-22, and NOSE questionnaires were collected preoperatively and at 3 months after surgery and compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were included in the study. The prevalence of ETD was 28.9% (22 patients) in group A, 27.3% (57 patients) in group B, and 31.1% (23 patients) in group C. The ETDQ-7 score decreased significantly after surgery: total patient population, 12.47 ± 7.0 to 8.2 ± 2.48 (p < 0.001); group A, 12.76 ± 6.62 to 8.47 ± 2.66 (p < 0.001); group B, 12.05 ± 6.89 to 8.35 ± 2.73 (p < 0.001); and group C, 13.24 ± 7.72 to 7.55 ± 1.25 (p < 0.001). Both SNOT-22 and NOSE scores also decreased significantly after surgery in the total patient population and in all three groups. There was a strong correlation between ETDQ-7 and SNOT-22 scores (r = 0.56, p < 0.001) and a moderate correlation between ETDQ-7 and NOSE scores (r = 0.33, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with CRS and/or NSD suffered from ETD, and showed significant improvement after surgery. In addition, ETD symptoms were shown to be affected by nasal obstruction as well as CRS symptoms.

Optimal application of soft-palate webbing flap pharyngoplasty combined with nasal surgery for surgical treatment of primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: Excessive collapse of the soft palate and lateral pharyngeal wall narrowing are established causes of loud snoring and sleep apnea in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Therefore, delicate surgical techniques are needed to reshape the soft palate and create sufficient tension in the lateral pharyngeal wall. This study aimed to determine the therapeutic outcome and favorable indications of soft-palate webbing flap pharyngoplasty in subjects with OSA and primary snoring. METHODS: A total of 174 subjects who underwent soft-palate webbing flap pharyngoplasty combined with uvulopalatal flap and septoturbinoplasty from August 2015 to February 2020 were included in this study. Medical records, including pre- and postoperative sleep parameters, were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome measure was the degree of improvement in AHI after surgery. Other outcomes were differences in surgical response rates, subjective visual analog score (VAS) for snoring, sleep quality, and complications. RESULTS: Polysomnographic results showed that apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scores were significantly reduced from 39.6 ± 6.1 to 22.9 ± 3.6 following soft-palate webbing flap pharyngoplasty in 59 subjects, and overall success and response rates of this technique were analyzed with 71%. We found that the successful outcomes were observed in 50% of mild (n = 12) and 56% of moderate (n = 16) subjects with OSA subjects due to lateral pharyngeal wall collapse. The success rate of soft-palate webbing flap pharyngoplasty was relatively higher in subjects with mild and moderate OSA than those with severe OSA. Additionally, the mean VAS snoring scale was 4.7 and subjects' primary snoring intensity significantly improved to 2.9 after soft-palate webbing flap pharyngoplasty. Subjective symptoms such as daytime sleepiness and sleep quality also showed improvement. Most complications were found to be minimal and improved by 1 month after the operation. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that soft-palate webbing flap pharyngoplasty is an effective treatment for OSA and primary snoring and may be a promising technique to reduce lateral pharyngeal wall collapse.

Chronic rhinosinusitis as a risk factor for intracranial and extracranial complications after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.

PURPOSE: To elucidate whether chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), usually an inflammatory-mediated rather than infectious process, is a risk factor for extracranial and intracranial complications after elective endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent ETSS between January 2015 and July 2019 was performed, which included chart review and computed tomography assessment. CRS was defined by symptomatology and concurrent endoscopic or radiographic findings. RESULTS: Of 292 subjects, 11% (n = 33) met criteria for CRS. Median difference in Lund-Mackay scores between the CRS and non-CRS groups was 3.0 (95% CI 2.0-4.0). Complications included acute rhinosinusitis requiring antibiotics (23%, 68/292), epistaxis (10%, 28/292), meningitis (1%, 3/292), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (7%, 20/292), revision sinonasal procedures (10%, 28/292), and frequent in-office debridement (13%, 39/292). CRS was strongly associated with postoperative acute rhinosinusitis (aRR 1.85, 95% CI 1.18-2.90) and frequent debridement (aRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.00-3.83). Conversely, CRS was not associated with epistaxis (aRR 1.52, 95% CI 0.62-3.72), postoperative CSF leak (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.24-3.44), or additional sinonasal procedures (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.21-2.29). The rate of meningitis was not significantly higher in the CRS cohort (difference 2.2%, 95% CI -1.0% to 14.5%). CONCLUSIONS: CRS was a strong risk factor for acute rhinosinusitis and need for frequent in-office debridement after ETSS. It was not associated with other postoperative complications including epistaxis, CSF leak, or revision sinonasal procedures. CRS patients had a slightly higher rate of meningitis, which is likely not clinically meaningful.

Opiate vs non-opiate prescription medication for pain control after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.

PURPOSE: Research indicates that most providers give opiates after endoscopic sinonasal surgery. The effectiveness of non-opiate medications after sinonasal surgery is poorly understood and most studies do not assess medication failure. This study compares oral opiate, oral opiate and topical steroid, and oral non-opiate pain control. Patient call-backs are used as a proxy for pain medication failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compares three medication regiments after sinonasal surgery for 180 adults with chronic rhinosinusitis. Patients were instructed to take acetaminophen for mild pain. For moderate/severe pain, patients used: 1) oxycodone-acetaminophen, 2) oxycodone-acetaminophen + budesonide nasal rinses, or 3) meloxicam + acetaminophen. Patients were instructed to call clinic if pain was not controlled. Descriptive statistics compared cohorts. Chi-square tests compared call-backs between cohorts. Logistic regression adjusted for baseline differences in covariates, comorbidities, and operative sites. RESULTS: Cohorts had similar age, sex distribution, disease features, and extent of surgery. The meloxicam cohort had less subjects with pain disorders. The oxycodone cohort had less subjects with diabetes, septoplasty, and turbinate reduction. After adjusting for baseline differences and using oxycodone as the reference group (n = 50), the odds of calling clinic for poorly controlled pain was 0.18 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.05-0.6) in the meloxicam cohort (n = 45) and 0.19 (95% CI:0.07-0.5) in the oxycodone + budesonide rinses cohort (n = 85). CONCLUSION: In this study, both meloxicam and oxycodone + budesonide rinses were more effective at controlling pain after sinonasal surgery than oxycodone alone.

The Contribution of Galenics to Patients' Sensory Perception of Nasal Sprays After Nasal Surgery: Data from a Prospective Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover, Multicentre Study.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative care after nasal surgery is commonly achieved with nasal sprays. The current study compared two decongesting, wound-healing nasal sprays in patients after nasal surgery in order to investigate their sensory perception. One of the sprays was a new galenic formulation (nasic® neo, Cassella-med GmbH & Co. KG). METHODS: According to the crossover design, patients who had undergone nasal surgery applied two different nasal sprays during two treatment periods of 4 days each, interrupted by a 3-day washout period. Sensory perception of the nasal sprays was assessed with the nasal spray sensoric scale. Throughout the study, nasal obstruction was evaluated by patients, and physical examinations, measurements of vital parameters and rhinoscopic examinations were carried out by investigators. Adverse events were documented during the entire study, and following treatment, patients judged the overall preference, efficacy and tolerability of both products. RESULTS: Overall, no significant differences in sum scores of the assessments of the nasal spray sensoric scale were observed between treatments. A significant period effect observed during the crossover study limited the overall analysis. Nevertheless, significantly more patients preferred the new galenics nasal spray compared to the comparator spray (57.1% vs. 34.7%; p = 0.031). Further, 10% more patients rated the efficacy of the new galenics as 'good' to 'very good' compared to the comparator. Importantly, a subgroup population of patients with more pronounced signs of inflammation present at screening evaluated the sensory perception of the new galenics as significantly better (p = 0.033) compared to the comparator. Within this subgroup, no period effect was observed. The application of both nasal sprays was shown to be safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: The overall sensory perception of both nasal sprays was evaluated comparably well in patients after nasal surgery and overall the application of the new galenics nasal spray was preferred by significantly more patients compared to the comparator nasal spray. Patients with marked nasal abnormalities may have a greater benefit from the contribution of galenics as significant differences in the sensory evaluation by the nasal spray sensoric scale in favour of the new galenics product were shown for this subgroup. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The current study was registered in the EU Clinical Trials Register with the EudraCT No. 2019-004936-52.

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for nasal blockage 21 years after total rhinectomy.

BACKGROUND: Total rhinectomy is an invasive procedure that significantly impairs the intranasal turbulence, humidification and heating of inspired air. The use of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for the treatment of sleep-disordered breathing disorders such as primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea has diminished over the past years because of the emergence of less invasive procedures and alternative therapeutic options. This clinical record presents the treatment of a long-term side effect of total rhinectomy using uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. CASE REPORT: In 1997, a 62-year-old male underwent total rhinectomy for a nasal schwannoma, followed by rehabilitation with a nasal prosthesis. Twenty-one years later, he presented with severe complaints of nasal blockage and breathing difficulties during both daytime and night-time. Clinical examination revealed no major anomalies besides significant velopharyngeal narrowing. Thus, in 2019, uvulopalatopharyngoplasty was performed to re-establish velopharyngeal patency. Hereafter, the symptoms of nasal blockage disappeared, resulting in an improved quality of life. CONCLUSION: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty may prove useful to treat selected patients with daytime breathing difficulties due to velopharyngeal narrowing.

Comparison between the endoscopic scores of bolgerization versus partial resection of the middle turbinate for management of the postoperative lateralization in the early follow-up period after endoscopic frontal sinusotomy: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Frontal sinusotomy is a challenging procedure that needs meticulous handling due to its unique anatomical position. Postoperative middle turbinate lateralization is critical comorbidity for the success rate, and many techniques are adopted to prevent it. The study aimed to compare the effect of middle turbinate bolgerization and partial resection on the postoperative endoscopic scores and assess their impact on the middle meatus and the frontal recess outcome. PATIENT AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on forty-one patients undergoing bilateral frontal sinusotomy for chronic frontal sinusitis. Nasal cavities were randomized so that partial middle turbinate resection technique was done alternately with bolgerization approach in every patient. Each participant acted as their control. Both sides were compared using Lund Kennedy Endoscopic Score (LKES) and Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy Score (POSE) at the baseline, 1st, 3rd, and 12th-month intervals postoperatively. Also, middle turbinate status was assessed at the end of the 12th-month interval using POSE score. RESULTS: The total frontal sinus patency rate was 82.9% (63/76 operated sinus). Baseline scores, LKES (3.79 ± 0.777 vs 4.05 ± 0.769, p = 0.142, for the side of resection and the side for bolgerization respectively) and POSE (1.79 ± 0.413 vs 1.82 ± 0.393, p = 0.777, for the side of resection and the side for bolgerization respectively). Regarding LKES, the differences between both operated sides were fluctuating with p values: 0.001*, 0.171, and 0.044* for the 1st, 3rd, and 12th months follow-up intervals, respectively. Regarding the POSE score of the frontal sinus, the difference between both groups was steadily increasing with p values: 0.318, 0.119, and 0.017* for the 1st, 3rd, and 12th months follow-up intervals. The middle turbinate's POSE score at the 12th month was significantly higher in the side allocated for bolgerization (p-value = 0.008*). CONCLUSION: Partial middle turbinate resection showed favorable endoscopic outcomes than bolgerization at the 12th month follow up period in patients undergoing primary ESS for chronic frontal sinusitis.

Effectiveness of endoscopic sinus surgery and aspirin therapy in the management of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.

Background: Aspirin therapy and/or type 2 (T2) biologics are used in the management of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Objective: To identify the number of patients with AERD who tolerated aspirin therapy, yet due to persistent symptoms, incorporated T2 biologic management. Methods: A retrospective review was performed between July 2016 and June 2019. Patients with AERD and who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), aspirin desensitization (AD), and at least 6 months of aspirin therapy (ATAD) after AD, and who remained biologic-naive up through this timepoint were included in the study. Introduction of a T2 biologic while on ATAD was the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was a change in a validated patient-reported outcome measure for chronic rhinosinusitis score between the postoperative predesensitization timepoint, and the 6-month postdesensitization timepoint, presented as means and compared by using the Student's t-test. Results: A total of 103 patients met inclusion criteria. Two patients (1.9%) ultimately supplemented ATAD with a T2 biologic. The mean outcomes measure test score after 6 months of ATAD for patients who received biologics was 40.5 versus 15 in those who did not receive biologics (p = 0.02). The mean differences between the postoperative predesensitization test score and the 6-month postdesensitization test score for patients who went on to receive biologics was an increase of 13 versus a decrease of 10 for those patients who did not receive biologics (p = 0.12). Conclusion: ESS, coupled with AD and ATAD, was successful in the long-term management of the majority of the patients with AERD, which rarely required the incorporation of T2 biologics. Patient questionnaires, such as outcomes measure test score, may identify aspirin therapy failures and help guide the practitioner in deciding when to introduce T2 biologics into the patient's treatment regimen.

Dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packing can reduce pain and improve sleep quality after nasal endoscopic surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Bilateral endoscopic nasal surgery is usually associated with pain and sleep disturbance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packing on analgesia and improvement of sleep quality in patients undergoing this surgery. METHOD: Eighty patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into 4 groups. At the end of surgery, dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packings were applied to three groups with a dosage of 1 µg kg-1 (D1), 2µg kg-1 (D2), 4 µg kg-1 (D4) and normal saline-soaked nasal packing (NS) was applied to a fourth group. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores using a visual analog scale (VAS) recorded at six time points: before the surgery (T1); 2 h (T2), 8 h (T3), 24 h (T4), 48 h (T5) after surgery; and at the moment of nasal packing removal (T6). Secondary outcomes were postoperative sleep status evaluated by the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and subjective sleep quality value (SSQV). Factors affecting sleep, hemodynamic changes, and adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: Compared with the NS group, dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packing significantly relieved postoperative pain and improved sleep quality. The effect was similar between D2 and D4, which was greater than in D1. However, D2 was associated with fewer adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine-soaked nasal packing not only offers effective analgesia but also improves postoperative sleep quality in patients undergoing bilateral endoscopic nasal surgery. Taking effect and adverse events into consideration, a dosage of 2µg kg-1 may be optimal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx (ChiCTR1900025692) Retrospectively registered 5 September 2019.

Unilateral mydriasis following septoplasty with inferior turbinate reduction.

Nasal septoplasty and inferior turbinate reduction are common procedures performed in the treatment of nasal obstruction. These procedures are generally considered to be safe with minimal reported complications. Herein, we describe a case of a 43-year-old female who developed transient unilateral mydriasis following septoplasty with inferior turbinate reduction, likely due to the sympathomimetic agents used for vasoconstriction and mucosal decongestion.

Droplet and Aerosol Generation With Endonasal Surgery: Methods to Mitigate Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To define the aerosol and droplet risks associated with endonasal drilling and to identify mitigation strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Simulation series with fluorescent 3-dimensional (3D) printed sinonasal models and deidentified cadaveric heads. SETTINGS: Dedicated surgical laboratory. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cadaveric specimens irrigated with fluorescent tracer and fluorescent 3D-printed models were drilled. A cascade impactor was used to collect aerosols and small droplets of various aerodynamic diameters under 15 µm. Large droplet generation was measured by evaluating the field for fluorescent debris. Aerosol plumes through the nares were generated via nebulizer, and mitigation measures, including suction and SPIWay devices, nasal sheaths, were evaluated regarding reduction of aerosol escape from the nose. RESULTS: The drilling of cadaveric specimens without flexible suction generated aerosols ≤3.30 µm, and drilling of 3D sinonasal models consistently produced aerosols ≤14.1 µm. Mitigation with SPIWay or diameter-restricted SPIWay produced same results. There was minimal field contamination in the cadaveric models, 0% to 2.77% field tarp area, regardless of drill burr type or drilling location; cutting burr drilling without suction in the 3D model yielded the worst contamination field (36.1%), followed by coarse diamond drilling without suction (19.4%). The simple placement of a flexible suction instrument in the nasal cavity or nasopharynx led to complete elimination of all aerosols ≤14.1 µm, as evaluated by a cascade impactor positioned immediately at the nares. CONCLUSION: Given the findings regarding aerosol risk reduction, we strongly recommend that physicians use a suction instrument in the nasal cavity or nasopharynx during endonasal surgery in the COVID-19 era.

Mitigation of Aerosols Generated During Rhinologic Surgery: A Pandemic-Era Cadaveric Simulation.

OBJECTIVE: After significant restrictions initially due to the COVID-19 pandemic, otolaryngologists have begun resuming normal clinical practice. However, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to health care workers through aerosolization and airborne transmission during rhinologic surgery remains incompletely characterized. The objective of this study was to quantify the number concentrations of aerosols generated during rhinologic surgery with and without interventions involving 3 passive suction devices. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaver simulation. SETTING: Dedicated surgical laboratory. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a simulation of rhinologic procedures with and without different passive suction interventions, the concentrations of generated aerosols in the particle size range of 0.30 to 10.0 µm were quantified with an optical particle sizer. RESULTS: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with and without microdebrider, high-speed powered drilling, use of an ultrasonic aspirator, and electrocautery all produced statistically significant increases in concentrations of aerosols of various sizes (P < .05). Powered drilling, ultrasonic aspirator, and electrocautery generated the highest concentration of aerosols, predominantly submicroparticles <1 µm. All interventions with a suction device were effective in reducing aerosols, though the surgical smoke evacuation system was the most effective passive suction method in 2 of the 5 surgical conditions with statistical significance (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Significant aerosol concentrations were produced in the range of 0.30 to 10.0 µm during all rhinologic procedures in this cadaver simulation. Rhinologic surgery with a passive suction device results in significant mitigation of generated aerosols.