Leveraging Nursing Assessment for Early Identification of Post Operative Gastrointestinal Dysfunction (POGD) in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.

Background: Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) remains a common morbidity after gastrointestinal surgery. POGD is associated with delayed hospital recovery, increased length of stay, poor patient satisfaction and experience, and increased economic hardship. The I-FEED scoring system was created by a group of experts to address the lack of a consistent objective definition of POGD. However, the I-FEED tool needs clinical validation before it can be adopted into clinical practice. The scope of this phase 1 Quality Improvement initiative involves the feasibility of implementing percussion into the nursing workflow without additional burden. Methods: All gastrointestinal/colorectal surgical unit registered nurses underwent comprehensive training in abdominal percussion. This involved understanding the technique, its application in postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction assessment, and its integration into the existing nursing documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). After six months of education and practice, a six-question survey was sent to all inpatient GI surgical unit nurses about incorporating the percussion assessment into their routine workflow and documentation. Results: Responses were received from 91% of day-shift nurses and 76% of night-shift registered nurses. Overall, 95% of the nurses were confident in completing the abdominal percussion during their daily assessment. Conclusion: Nurses' effective use of the I-FEED tool may help improve patient outcomes after surgery. The tool could also be an effective instrument for the early identification of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) in surgical patients.

Registered general nurses' health assessment practices in a tertiary hospital: A focused ethnography study.

AIM: To explore the assumptions and values that influence nursing health assessment practices among registered general nurses in general medical and surgical wards. DESIGN: The study was designed as a focused ethnography. METHODS: A semi-structured interview guide was used to explore prevailing nursing health assessment practices of 13 registered general nurses in an attempt to explore the assumptions and values influencing health assessment practices in the study setting. Data were analysed inductively using an interpretive qualitative content analysis method. RESULTS: Nursing health assessment practices, and underlying assumptions and values were underpinned by a central theme of a culture of low expectation relating to nursing health assessment. The culture of low expectation was highlighted in five themes: (1) Unsystematic Assessment of Health Status, (2) Purpose of Nursing Health Assessment, (3) The Role of Nursing Educational and Regulatory Institutions, (4) Ward Ethos and (5) The Role of Organizational and Ward Leadership. IMPLICATION: The adoption of a holistic nursing health assessment framework with a clearly defined purpose of aiding nursing diagnoses can guide patient-centred care delivery and facilitate early recognition of physiological deterioration. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Thirteen registered general nurses were interviewed, and the initial findings returned to them for validation. CONCLUSION: The potential contribution of nursing health assessment to nursing practice and patient outcomes may not be fully realized if nursing health assessment is not situated within a holistic health assessment model with a clearly defined purpose for nursing practice.

[Better assessment, better care: Quetci, a questionnaire for assessing cognitive disorders in nursing practice]. / Mieux évaluer, mieux soigner : le Quetci, un questionnaire d'évaluation des troubles cognitifs IDE.

Cognitive disorders can have significant repercussions on the quality of care and daily life for patients. We have developed a new tool specifically designed for nursing practice to identify these problems in patients with brain tumors. The Cognitive Impairment Assessment Questionnaire for nursing practice is an objective, quick and easy-to-administer tool that is readily accepted by patients.

[Design of a nursing assessment instrument during pregnancy monitoring in Primary Health care and the validation of its content]. / Diseño de un instrumento de valoración enfermera para el seguimiento de embarazo en Atención Primaria de salud y la validación de su contenido.

OBJECTIVE: This research aims to develop a nursing assessment tool, based on Gordon's Health Functional Patterns, through a content validation by a committee of experts, applying a Delphi technique. DESIGN: An assessment instrument with 53 items has been designed. SITE: It is carried out within the framework of a doctoral thesis, for its implementation by midwives of Primary Health Care. PARTICIPANTS: The committee was made up of 16 professionals with a hide clinical, teaching and research experience who all participated in the entire validation process. INTERVENTION: It has been assessed as a whole and in each of the items through four rounds of consultations, establishing a positive assessment of more than 60% to accept each item, as well as incorporating the suggestions provided by the committee. The final version had to reach a unanimous consensus. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: All items were accepted with a score higher than 60%. RESULTS: There were no contradictions between the inputs provided by the experts, so all of them were integrated into the final version that has a 100% approval by the committee. CONCLUSION: After this process, a new assessment tool is presented to be applied by primary care midwives in the pregnancy monitoring. The questionnaire has been piloted with 50 pregnant women, determining the most prevalent nursing diagnoses, establishing the workload for the midwife of her implementation of individualized care plans to improve some health indicators of pregnant women.

Development and Implementation of a Pediatric Nursing Emergency Behavioral Health Assessment Tool.

INTRODUCTION: The national pediatric mental and behavioral health crisis dramatically increased emergency department mental and behavioral health visits and changed emergency nursing practice. Acuity assessment determines patient severity level and supports appropriate resources and interventions. There are no established nursing tools that assess pediatric mental or behavioral health acuity in the emergency department setting. Our goal was to develop and implement the novel pediatric emergency nurse Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool. METHODS: This quality-improvement project used the plan, do, study, act model to design/refine the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool and a non-experimental descriptive design to assess outcomes. The setting was a 47-bed urban level 1 pediatric trauma center with more than 60,000 annual visits. The team designed the tool using published evidence, emergency nurse feedback, and expert opinion. The tool objectively captured patient acuity and suggested acuity-specific nursing interventions. Project outcomes included acuity, length-of-stay, restraint use, and patient/staff injuries. Analyses included descriptive statistics and correlations. RESULTS: With over 3000 annual mental/behavioral-related visits, the emergency department had an average daily census of 23 mental and behavioral health patients. Implementation occurred in August 2021. The Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool dashboard provided the number of patients, patient location, and acuity. Length-of-stay did not change; however, patient restraint use and patient/staff injuries declined. Number of restraints positively correlated with moderate acuity levels (r = 0.472, P = 0.036). DISCUSSION: For emergency nurses, the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool provided an objective measure of patient acuity. Targeted interventions can improve the care of this population.

Construction of a nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period: A modified Delphi study.

AIM: To construct a nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period. DESIGN: A three-round modified Delphi method was employed to capture the consensus of 22 panellists. METHODS: The initial items in the nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period were developed based on the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX). A panel of 22 experts participated in this study. The panellists have more than 10 years of experience in either clinical anaesthesia, or post-anesthesia nursing, or operating room nursing, or surgical intensive nursing. Between March and April 2023, the panellists evaluated and recommended revisions to the initial framework. RESULTS: This study resulted in the development of a nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period. The initial version of the framework consisted of six dimensions with 27 items. Six items were modified after the first round of consultation. After the second round, five modifications and four deletions were made based on expert opinion. The third round resulted in a convergence of expert opinion. The framework, which consists of 24 items across five dimensions, was refined. The five dimensions are as follows: History-taking, Physical assessment, Clinical judgement, Organizational efficiency and Humanistic concern. CONCLUSION: The nursing assessment framework for patients in anaesthesia recovery period was reached consensus between the 22 experts' opinions. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: The assessment framework constructed in this study could be used for the process evaluation of post-anesthesia nursing. The framework may guide perianesthesia nurses in the timely and effective assessment of patients during this critical phase of care. It may be used for perianesthesia nursing education or to evaluate nurses' assessment skills. REPORTING METHOD: The study is reported in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and Reporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) recommendations. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part I).

Nursing assessment is the basis for performing interventions that match patient needs, but nurses perceive it as an administrative load. This research aims to develop and validate a meta-instrument that integrates the assessment of functional capacity, risk of pressure ulcers and risk of falling with a more parsimonious approach to nursing assessment in adult hospitalization units. Specifically, this manuscript presents the results of the development of this meta-instrument (VALENF instrument). A cross-sectional study based on recorded data was carried out in a sample of 1352 nursing assessments. Socio-demographic variables and assessments of Barthel, Braden and Downton indices at the time of admission were included. The meta-instrument's development process includes: (i) nominal group; (ii) correlation analysis; (iii) multiple linear regressions models; (iv) reliability analysis. A seven-item solution showed a high predictive capacity with Barthel (R2adj = 0.938), Braden (R2adj = 0.926) and Downton (R2adj = 0.921) indices. Likewise, reliability was significant (p < 0.001) for Barthel (ICC = 0.969; τ-b = 0.850), Braden (ICC = 0.943; τ-b = 0.842) and Downton (ICC = 0.905; κ = 7.17) indices. VALENF instrument has an adequate predictive capacity and reliability to assess the level of functional capacity, risk of pressure injuries and risk of falls.

Decision-Tree-Based Approach for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Immobilized Patients.

Applications where data mining tools are used in the fields of medicine and nursing are becoming more and more frequent. Among them, decision trees have been applied to different health data, such as those associated with pressure ulcers. Pressure ulcers represent a health problem with a significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of immobilized patients and on the quality of life of affected people and their families. Nurses provide comprehensive care to immobilized patients. This fact results in an increased workload that can be a risk factor for the development of serious health problems. Healthcare work with evidence-based practice with an objective criterion for a nursing professional is an essential addition for the application of preventive measures. In this work, two ways for conducting a pressure ulcer risk assessment based on a decision tree approach are provided. The first way is based on the activity and mobility characteristics of the Braden scale, whilst the second way is based on the activity, mobility and skin moisture characteristics. The results provided in this study endow nursing professionals with a foundation in relation to the use of their experience and objective criteria for quick decision making regarding the risk of a patient to develop a pressure ulcer.

Instrumentos de evaluación de los factores que influyen en la capacitación continua del profesional de enfermería / Instruments for Evaluating the Influencing Factors on Continuous Training of Nursing Professionals

Introducción: Enfermería requiere de una construcción constante de conocimientos mediante capacitación continua, la que puede limitarse por factores organizacionales o motivacionales; los instrumentos para evaluarlos pueden excluir determinantes importantes a identificar. Objetivo: Analizar los instrumentos que evalúan los factores que influyen en la capacitación continua del profesional de enfermería. Métodos: Revisión sistemática, realizada entre septiembre 2020 y febrero 2021, de artículos publicados en inglés, español, portugués y malayu entre 2011 y 2021 en Scopus, Redalyc, SciELO, Dialnet, Lilacs, Elsevier y Google académico. La pregunta guía se elaboró con el acrónimo PICo. Para la búsqueda se aceptaron descriptores en Ciencias de la Salud (DeCS) "Enfermería", "Evaluación en enfermería", "Capacitación Profesional", en inglés (MeSH) "Nursing", "Nursing Assessment", "Professional Training", y los operadores booleanos AND, OR, se utilizó el diagrama de flujo (PRISMA). Se identificaron 72 artículos e incluyeron 9. El análisis de contenido permitió la interpretación de los referentes teóricos y la organización del conocimiento de la bibliografía encontrada. Conclusiones: Cada tipo de modalidad (presencial, semipresencial, en línea y a distancia) mostró factores negativos para que el profesional se capacite; sin embargo, la mayoría de las evaluaciones se enfocan en razones organizacionales y motivacionales, que excluyeron otras que son responsabilidad del profesional, como estado de salud, habilidad en el equipo de cómputo o dominar un segundo idioma. No hay un instrumento que integre todos los factores del porque enfermería no se capacita y los que se incluyeron en los instrumentos se clasificaron en cuatro dimensiones: sociodemográficas, personales, laborales y organizacionales(AU)

Introduction: Nursing requires constant construction of knowledge through continuous updating and training. Different factors, not only organizational or motivational ones, can negatively limit said activity; the instruments to evaluate them can exclude important determinants to identify. Objective: To analyze the instruments that evaluate the influencing factors of continuous training of nursing professionals. Methods: A systematic review was carried out from September 2020 to February 2021 with an antiquity of less than 10 years from the search in digital platforms such as Redalyc, SciELO, UNAM University Nursing, InfoMed, Dialnet, Academic Google and Elsevier, through Boolean operators AND, OR, NOT, and keywords. Seventy-two articles were identified, 52 useful for the review and 14 with mention of validated and non-validated instruments. The languages identified were Spanish, English, Portuguese and Malayu. Conclusions: Each type of modality (face-to-face, hybrid, online and distance) showed a negative factor for professionals to be trained; however, most evaluations focus on organizational and motivational reasons, excluding others that are the responsibility of the professional, such as health status, ability on the computer equipment or handling a second language. There is not an instrument that integrates all the factors, because nursing professionals are not trained and those factors that were included in the instruments were classified in four dimensions: sociodemographic, personal, work and organizational, as an evaluation proposal(AU)

Pain as an Early Indicator of Pressure Ulcer Risk.

Pain may be an important factor to consider when assessing patients for the development of pressure ulcers, but more research is needed to assess the characteristics associated with pain as a symptom preceding these injuries.

Time from Pain Assessment to Pain Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe factors that influence nurses' time from pain assessment to intervention for acute postsurgical pain. BACKGROUND: Nurses' time is a limited resource that must be optimized to manage patients' pain within budget constraints. Little is known about processes and activities nurses negotiate to manage pain. METHODS: Human factors engineering and ethnography were used to quantify factors influencing time from pain assessment to intervention. RESULTS: On the basis of 175.5 observation hours, nurses spent 11% of shifts (mean, 83 minutes) on pain care activities. Time from alert to intervention with PRN analgesics or biobehavioral strategies for 58 cases ranged from 0 to 48 minutes (mean, <11 minutes). Five factors influenced timeliness. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses most efficiently managed postsurgical pain by giving analgesics ordered PRN on a scheduled basis. Nurse leaders can empower prompt responses to patients' pain through delegation, process improvements, real-time monitoring, and prescriber engagement.

Failure to detect ward hypoxaemia and hypotension: contributions of insufficient assessment frequency and patient arousal during nursing assessments.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hypotension and hypoxaemia are common and often unrecognised. With intermittent nursing vital signs, hypotensive or hypoxaemic episodes might be missed because they occur between scheduled measurements, or because the process of taking vital signs arouses patients and temporarily improves arterial blood pressure and ventilation. We therefore estimated the fraction of desaturation and hypotension episodes that did not overlap nursing assessments and would therefore usually be missed. We also evaluated the effect of taking vital signs on blood pressure and oxygen saturation. METHODS: We estimated the fraction of desaturated episodes (arterial oxygen saturation <90% for at least 90% of the time within 30 continuous minutes) and hypotensive episodes (MAP <70 mm Hg for 15 continuous minutes) that did not overlap nursing assessments in patients recovering from noncardiac surgery. We also evaluated changes over time before and after nursing visits. RESULTS: Among 782 patients, we identified 878 hypotensive episodes and 2893 desaturation episodes, of which 79% of the hypotensive episodes and 82% of the desaturation episodes did not occur within 10 min of a nursing assessment and would therefore usually be missed. Mean BP and oxygen saturation did not improve by clinically meaningful amounts during nursing vital sign assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Hypotensive and desaturation episodes are mostly missed because vital sign assessments on surgical wards are sparse, rather than being falsely negative because the assessment process itself increases blood pressure and oxygen saturation. Continuous vital sign monitoring will detect more disturbances, potentially giving clinicians time to intervene before critical events occur.

Mixed Methods Study of Nurse Assessment of Patient Preferences for Engagement During Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Global healthcare initiatives emphasize the importance of engaging patients in their healthcare to improve patients' experience and outcomes. Assessing patient preferences for engagement is critical, as there are many ways patients can engage in their care and preferences vary across individuals. OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementation of the Patient Preferences for Engagement Tool 13-Item Short Form (PPET13) during hospitalization on patient and nurse experience of engagement. Readmissions and emergency department (ED) usage within 30 days postdischarge were also examined. METHODS: The mixed methods study was conducted within two medical units in the United States between December 2018 and May 2019. Preimplementation group patients completed a demographic survey and the Patient Experience of Engagement Survey (PEES) on discharge. Implementation group patients completed the PPET13 within 24 hours of admission with their nurse and the demographic survey and PEES on discharge. A focus group with nurses who implemented the PPET13 was conducted following the implementation period. Data analysis included confirmatory factor analysis, multiple and logistic regression, and qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in PEES scores during the implementation phase. The PEES score was a significant predictor of ED visits, but not 30-day readmissions. Nurses were not always certain how to best integrate patient preferences for engagement into their care delivery and suggested integrating the PPET13 into the electronic health record to assist with streamlining the assessment and communicating preferences across the care team. DISCUSSION: Assessing patients' preferences for engagement using the PPET13 was associated with an improved experience of engagement, which was found to mediate the relationship between utilization of PPET13 and ED usage within 30 days postdischarge. Use of a patient engagement preference tool, such as the PPET13, can help inform the delivery of individualized engagement strategies to improve patient and family engagement and outcomes; however, nurses need formalized education on how to tailor their care to meet the individual engagement preferences of their patients.

Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Evaluating Linear Scars after Thyroidectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) in evaluating thyroidectomy scars. METHODS: At 6 months after the operation, 112 patients who underwent thyroid surgery via collar neck incision were evaluated by two blinded plastic surgeons and two senior residents using the VSS and the observer component of the POSAS. In addition, the observer-reported VAS score and patient-reported Likert score were evaluated. Internal consistency, interobserver reliability, and correlations between the patient- and observer-reported outcomes were examined. RESULTS: The observer component of POSAS scores demonstrated higher internal consistency and interobserver reliability than the VSS. However, the correlations between the observer-reported VAS score and the patient-reported Likert score (0.450) and between the total sum of patient and observer component scores (0.551) were low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The POSAS is more consistent over repeated measurements; accordingly, it may be considered a more objective and reliable scar assessment tool than the VSS. However, a clinician's perspective may not exactly match the patient's perception of the same scar.

Using Facial Recognition Tools for Health Assessment.

The number of applications for facial recognition technology is increasing due to the improvement in image quality, artificial intelligence, and computer processing power that has occurred during the last decades. Algorithms can be used to convert facial anthropometric landmarks into a computer representation, which can be used to help identify nonverbal information about an individual's health status. This article discusses the potential ways a facial recognition tool can perform a health assessment. Because facial attributes may be considered biometric data, clinicians should be informed about the clinical, ethical, and legal issues associated with its use.

Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence about the role of nurses in patient outcomes in several healthcare settings. However, there is still a lack of evidence about the transitional care setting. We aimed to assess the association between patient characteristics identified in a multidimensional nursing assessment and outcomes of mortality and acute hospitalization during community hospital stay. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed on patients consecutively admitted to a community hospital (CH) in Loreto (Ancona, Italy) between January 1st, 2018 and May 31st, 2019. The nursing assessment included sociodemographic characteristics, functional status, risk of falls (Conley Score) and pressure damage (Norton scale), nursing diagnoses, presence of pressure sores, feeding tubes, urinary catheters or vascular access devices and comorbidities. Two logistic regression models were developed to assess the association between patient characteristics identified in a multidimensional nursing assessment and outcomes of mortality and acute hospitalization during CH stay. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 298 patients. The mean age was 83 ± 9.9 years; 60.4% (n = 180) were female. The overall mean length of stay was 42.8 ± 36 days (32 ± 32 days for patients who died and 33.9 ± 35 days for patients who had an acute hospitalization, respectively). An acute hospitalization was reported for 13.4% (n = 40) of patients and 21.8% (n = 65) died. An increased risk of death was related to female sex (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.10-4.62), higher Conley Score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.03-1.37) and having a vascular access device (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.82-7.27). A higher Norton score was associated with a decreased risk of death (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.81). The risk for acute hospitalization was correlated with younger age (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97), having a vascular access device (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.02-5.36), impaired walking (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.03-6.06) and it is inversely correlated with a higher Conley score (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.98). CONCLUSION: Using a multidimensional nursing assessment enables identification of risk of nearness of end of life and acute hospitalization to target care and treatment. The present study adds further knowledge on this topic and confirms the importance of nursing assessment to evaluate the risk of patients' adverse outcome development.

Preventing, identifying and managing delirium in nursing homes and acute settings.

Older people, particularly those in nursing homes, are vulnerable to delirium, which is a condition characterised by confusion. This article outlines the risk factors, prevention, identification and management of delirium in older people in nursing homes and acute settings. It uses a case study approach to encourage nurses to consider the challenges faced in these settings and how they could address delirium. The article also details the multicomponent interventions that can be used for prevention, as well as the available delirium assessment tools, with a focus on selecting tools based on the person's health status and the healthcare setting.

Nivel de adherencia al protocolo asistencial para la prevención de lesiones por presión en servicios de atención al grave / Level of Adherence to the Care Protocol for the Prevention of Pressure Injuries in Services of Care for Seriously Ill Patients

Introducción: La implementación de protocolos asistenciales como proyección estratégica en la prestación de servicios de salud permite contribuir a mejorar la calidad de la atención. Objetivo: Identificar el nivel de adherencia al protocolo asistencial para la prevención de lesiones por presión en servicios de atención al grave. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo y transversal en cinco servicios de atención al grave del Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras, desde octubre a diciembre de 2019. Según criterios, la muestra quedó constituida por 31 personal de enfermería, de ellos, 16 licenciados en enfermería (51,61 por ciento) y 15 enfermeros técnicos (48,39 por ciento). Fueron evaluadas 21 historias clínicas. La recolección de la información se realizó mediante un test de conocimientos y una lista de chequeo, validados a través de criterios de expertos. Se realizó prueba piloto con el test, que permitió evaluar su validez y confiabilidad. Resultados: El 92,09 por ciento del total de los evaluados presentaron conocimientos medianamente suficientes (64,51 por ciento) y suficientes (27,58 por ciento). En cuatro servicios evaluados (80 por ciento) tenían disponible los recursos materiales. En 21 historias clínicas (100 por ciento) se valoraron los factores de riesgo. La identificación del riesgo, así como la planificación y ejecución de intervenciones de enfermería, solamente se reflejaron en 10 historias (47,61 por ciento). Se obtuvieron 4,33 puntos en la sumatoria total. Conclusiones: Se determinó como de nivel medio la adherencia al protocolo asistencial para la prevención de lesiones por presión en servicios de atención al grave(AU)

Introduction: The implementation of care protocols as a strategic projection in the provision of health services allows to contribute to improving the quality of care. Objective: To identify the level of adherence to the care protocol for the prevention of pressure injuries in care services for severely ill patients. Methods: Descriptive and cross-sectional study carried out in five care services for severely ill patients at Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital, from October to December 2019. Based on to criteria, the sample consisted of 31 nursing staff members, of which sixteen were diploma nurses (51.61 percent) and fifteen were associate nurses (48.39 percent). Twenty-one medical records were assessed. The information was collected using a knowledge test and a checklist, validated through expert criteria. A pilot test was carried out with the test, which made it possible to evaluate its validity and reliability. Results: 92.09 percent of those evaluated had moderately sufficient (64.51 percent) and sufficient (27.58 percent) knowledge. In four assessed services (80 percent), the material resources were available. Risk factors were assessed in 21 medical records (100 percent). The identification of risk, as well as the planning and execution of nursing interventions, were only reflected in ten medical records (47.61 percent). In the total sum, 4.33 points were obtained. Conclusions: Adherence to the care protocol for the prevention of pressure injuries in serious care services was determined as medium level(AU)