ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify safety signals of ophthalmic prostaglandin analogues through data mining the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: A data mining search by proportional reporting ratio, reporting OR, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, information component 0.25 and χ2 for safety signals detection was conducted to the FAERS database for the following ophthalmic medications: latanoprost, travoprost, tafluprost and bimatoprost. RESULTS: 12 preferred terms were statistically associated: diabetes mellitus, n=2; hypoacusis, n=2; malignant mediastinal neoplasm, n=1; blood immunoglobulin E increased, n=1; cataract, n=1; blepharospasm, n=1; full blood count abnormal, n=1; skin exfoliation, n=1; chest discomfort, n=1; and dry mouth, n=1. LIMITATION OF THE STUDY: The FAERS database's limitations, such as the undetermined causality of cases, under-reporting and the lack of restriction to only health professionals reporting this type of event, could modify the statistical outcomes. These limitations are particularly relevant in the context of ophthalmic drug analysis, as they can affect the accuracy and reliability of the data, potentially leading to biased or incomplete results. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have revealed a potential relationship due to the biological plausibility among malignant mediastinal neoplasm, full blood count abnormal, blood immunoglobulin E increased, diabetes mellitus, blepharospasm, cataracts, chest discomfort and dry mouth; therefore, it is relevant to continue investigating the possible drug-event association, whether to refute the safety signal or identify a new risk.
Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Data Mining , Databases, Factual , United States Food and Drug Administration , Humans , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Prostaglandins, Synthetic/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a severe systemic allergic reaction that can be life-threatening, timely diagnosis and treatment is required in these patients, one of the most frequent triggers is pharmacological. OBJECTIVE: To report the case of a patient who presented anaphylaxis due to eye drops. CASE REPORT: A 7-year-old male with a history of rhinitis and asthma with good control. It started with itchy eyes, ophthalmic drops were administered, composition: Polyethylene glycol 400, 0.4%, Propylene glycol 3 mg, polyquad 0.001%, presenting at 15 minutes an episode of anaphylaxis initially characterized by pruritus and intense conjunctival erythema, later nausea, vomiting, sweating, weakness, urticaria/facial angioedema and dyspnea were added, this episode was controlled opportunely with Levocetirizine 5 mg sublingual and Betametasona 4 mg intramuscular, progressively improving over the next 2 hours. The patient was evaluated by the Allergist, written recommendations were given to the mother in case this reaction occurred again, the use of the drops was prohibited, and the performance of skin test and a probable conjunctival provocation protocolized with the ophthalmic drops were pending. Accidentally 2 months later the patient was re-exposed with the same eye drops, presenting a similar reaction 15 minutes after the administration of the medication, they went to the emergency room where he received antihistamine and corticosteroid intravenous treatment, after this re-exposure is confirmed to the ophthalmic drops mentioned above as a trigger of anaphylaxis in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: We present a case of conjunctival anaphylaxis after application of eye drops, confirmed by re-exposure to the drug. It is essential to give diagnoses, recommendations with treatments and avoidance of the probable triggering agent of the reaction. The administration of immediate medication when the allergic episode begins in these patients can be vital, even more so when they live far from a health center, as was the case in this patient.
ANTECEDENTES: La anafilaxia es una reacción alérgica sistémica severa que puede llegar a comprometer la vida. Se requiere de un diagnóstico y tratamiento oportuno en estos pacientes, uno de los desencadenantes más frecuente es el farmacológico. OBJETIVO: Reportar el caso de un paciente que presentó anafilaxia a gotas oftálmicas. REPORTE DE CASO: Varón de siete años de edad con antecedentes de rinitis y asma con buen control. Inició con picor ocular, se le administraron gotas oftálmicas, composición: Polietilenglicol 400, 0,4%, Propilenglicol 3 mg, polyquad 0,001%, y a los 15 minutos presentó un episodio de anafilaxia caracterizado, inicialmente, por prurito y eritema conjuntival intenso; posteriormente, presentó náuseas, vómito, sudoración, debilidad, urticaria/angioedema facial y disnea. Este episodio fue controlado en el momento, con tratamiento de Levoceterizina 5 mg s.l. y Betametasona 4 mg i.m., con mejoría progresiva en las siguientes dos horas. El paciente fue evaluado por la especialidad de alergología. A su madre se dieron recomendaciones por escrito, por si se presentaba nuevamente la reacción. Se prohibió la utilización de las gotas, y quedó pendiente la realización de las pruebas cutáneas y una probable provocación conjuntival protocolizada con las gotas oftálmicas. Accidentalmente, dos meses después se reexpuso al paciente con las mismas gotas oftálmicas, y a los 15 minutos de la administración del medicamento, presentó una reacción similar, por lo que acudieron a emergencias donde recibió tratamiento antihistamínico y corticoides vía i.m.; tras esta reexposición, se confirma a las gotas oftálmicas mencionadas anteriomente, como desencadenantes de anafilaxia en el paciente. CONCLUSIONES: Presentamos un caso sobre anafilaxia por vía conjuntival tras aplicación de gotas oftálmicas, confirmado por la reexposición al fármaco. Es esencial dar diagnósticos, recomendaciones con tratamientos y evitar el probable agente desencadenante de la reacción. La administración de medicación inmediata cuando inicia el episodio alérgico en estos pacientes, puede ser vital, más aún cuando viven lejos de un centro de salud, como era el caso referenciado.
Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Ophthalmic Solutions , Humans , Male , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , ChildABSTRACT
Over the past 15 years, the increasing nonmedical use of tropicamide ophthalmic drops has been reported in Europe, coinciding with an increase in opioid addiction and drug-related mortality. Although tropicamide is generally known as a cheap alternative to heroin in Eastern Europe, it still appears to be a relatively new phenomenon that has arisen over the last decade. A narrative review was conducted of all the relevant sources published in more than five countries between January 1, 1975 and January 10, 2021. For bibliographic accuracy, the materials published in Russian and Italian were professionally translated to English. During the preparation of this report, we were able to interview five Russian-speaking patients who injected tropicamide in the past and we discuss another case of intravenous tropicamide use. This review was acknowledged by the institutional review board of the University of Missouri-Kansas City. All patients interviewed at the Unica Medical Center consented for their clinical information to be reported in a medical publication. We analyzed data from 50+ various sources and covered a variety of drug-related issues, including information on the extent, patterns, and trends in tropicamide use, its health consequences, and other clinical findings. The information provided in this article may help providers better detect tropicamide abuse and incorporate new rehabilitation strategies into the management of these patients.
Subject(s)
Tropicamide , Humans , Tropicamide/adverse effects , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Europe , ItalyABSTRACT
La enfermedad de la superficie ocular incluye a un grupo de patologías con diversas etiologías, síntomas y hallazgos clínicos que comparten la producción de reacción inflamatoria y daño de esta superficie. El uso de derivados hemáticos para el tratamiento de patologías de la superficie ocular se ha incrementado en el área de la oftalmología, ya que su composición es análoga a la de la lágrima natural. Con el objetivo de mostrar la terapia celular como una nueva disciplina científica a aplicar en nuestro medio, se realizó una búsqueda automatizada sobre el tema, teniendo en cuenta las publicaciones de los últimos 5 años. Se utilizó la plataforma Infomed, cuya información fue resumida para la elaboración del informe final, donde se expone que los colirios de hemoderivados proveen estrategias de tratamiento eficaces y seguras para pacientes con afecciones oftálmicas. El colirio de plasma rico en plaquetas ofrece una opción exitosa de tratamiento en numerosas afecciones de la superficie ocular. Sin embargo, estudios adicionales son necesarios para establecer la seguridad y la eficacia de este tipo de terapias(AU)
Ocular surface diseases are a group of conditions of different etiologies, symptoms and clinical findings with the common features of developing an inflammatory reaction and damaging the ocular surface. Use of blood-derived products for the treatment of ocular surface disorders has increased in ophthalmic care, since their composition is similar to that of natural tears. With the purpose of presenting cell therapy as a new scientific discipline that could be used in our environment, an automated search was conducted about the topic which included publications from the last five years. The search was performed on the Infomed platform, and the information obtained was summarized into a final report stating that blood-derived eye drops provide effective and safe treatment strategies for patients with ophthalmic conditions. Platelet-rich plasma eye drops are a potentially successful treatment option for many ocular surface disorders. However, further studies are required to establish the safety and effectiveness of this type of therapy(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Blood-Derivative Drugs , Platelet-Rich Plasma/drug effects , Review Literature as Topic , Databases, Bibliographic , Research ReportABSTRACT
SUMMARY: Topical treatments in ophthalmologic therapy are significant for the development of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in the periorbital region. Preservatives, antibiotics, glucocorticoids, and beta-blocker eye drops are defined as drugs with the highest sensitizing potential. The unavailability of patch test batteries containing substances of ophthalmological use makes it difficult for this diagnosis. In the present report, we describe six patients who developed ACD induced by different agents presenting in eye drops, confirmed with the cutaneous patch tests. The ACD diagnosis due to ophthalmic medications can be challenging, since many different agents can cause it, and the sensitivity of these cutaneous tests is low. Thus, early diagnosis is essential to avoid the complications of ACD on the skin and ocular disorders related to chronic periorbital eczema.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatology , Brazil , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Humans , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Patch TestsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: It is known that vision disorders are within the context of public health problems. In childhood, during the neuropsychomotor development phase, visual changes are crucial, since there is a strong correlation between poor school performance and changes in acuity. For these reasons, ophthalmological examination in children, including refraction, is extremely important, aiming at the early diagnosis of diseases and possible refractive errors that may compromise the child's life and development. 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride eye drops are the most used during ophthalmic clinical evaluation as a cycloplegic and mydriatic agent to assist in refractive examination. OBJECTIVE: The ocular and systemic side effects of 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride eye drops were studied in patients who underwent static refractive examination in the strabismus sector of the Ophthalmology Discipline of the Centro Universitário FMABC. METHODS: A drop of 1% cyclopentolate is instilled in both eyes of each patient and the possible ocular and systemic signs and symptoms presented were observed after 40 minutes and 24 hours after instillation. RESULTS: We expect to find ocular side effects more evident than systemic symptoms in the two evaluation times (40 minutes and 24 hours after instillation). All symptoms (ocular and systemic) are reversed spontaneously. CONCLUSION: The present study aims to show that the side effects observed by the topical (ocular) use of cyclopentolate eye drops 1% are few and present spontaneous reversal both from an eye point of view, as well as from a systemic point of view.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Refraction, Ocular , Child Health , Cyclopentolate/adverse effects , Adolescent Health , Eye Health Services , Prospective Studies , Diagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Many patients with open-angle glaucoma eventually require >2 medications to lower their intraocular pressure (IOP). Fixed-combination ophthalmic solutions can be advantageous in patients who require multiple medications, but the number of fixed combinations combining 3 complementary IOP-lowering agents remains limited. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a triple fixed combination (TFC) of bimatoprost 0.01%/brimonidine 0.15%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT), compared with a dual fixed combination (DFC) of brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5%. METHODS: Patients with a baseline IOP of 23-34 mm Hg in both eyes and no history of IOP-lowering procedures were eligible for participation in this multicenter, double-masked, randomized, Phase III study. After washout of previous treatment (if applicable), patients were randomized to receive TFC or DFC twice daily in each eye for 3 months. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in mean IOP in the worse eye at week 12 in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. TFC was superior to DFC if the treatment difference (TFC - DFC) favored TFC at week 12 (P ≤ 0.05; 2-sample t test). Secondary and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Safety, including adverse events, was assessed at all visits. FINDINGS: The mITT/safety population included 185 patients (TFC, n = 90; DFC, n = 95). TFC superiority was demonstrated at all postbaseline visits (all, P < 0.001) through week 12 (week 12 treatment difference: â2.17 mm Hg; 95% CI, â3.12 to â1.22). While treatment-related conjunctival hyperemia was more frequent with TFC than with DFC (47.8% vs 23.2%; P < 0.001), consistent with the additional presence of bimatoprost in TFC, most cases were mild and the numbers of patient discontinuations at week 12 were similar between the TFC and DFC groups (11 [12.2%] vs 7 [7.4%] patients; P = 0.266). No unexpected adverse events were reported. IMPLICATIONS: Compared with DFC, TFC provided superior IOP lowering throughout the primary efficacy period. An acceptable tolerability profile was observed through 12 months of use of TFC, offering an effective therapeutic option in patients with POAG or OHT who require multiple medications to control their IOP. Additional studies are required for the assessment of the long-term effects of TFC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01217606.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Bimatoprost/administration & dosage , Brimonidine Tartrate/administration & dosage , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Timolol/administration & dosage , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Bimatoprost/adverse effects , Brazil , Brimonidine Tartrate/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Timolol/adverse effectsSubject(s)
Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis , Ciprofloxacin/adverse effects , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Ophthalmic Solutions , Skin/pathology , Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis/diagnosis , Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis/etiology , Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis/physiopathology , Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis/therapy , Administration, Topical , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Biopsy/methods , Ciprofloxacin/administration & dosage , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug Substitution , Emollients/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Withholding TreatmentABSTRACT
The effect of the systemic absorption of 0.1% diclofenac sodium (DS) eyedrop was compared to that of 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine (KT) in female New Zealand white rabbits treated on both eyes three times a day for 90 days. The rabbits were divided in three groups of six animals (n= 18): KT group, DS group, and control (Co) group, in which saline (0.9% NaCl) solution was instilled. Water and food consumption were measured daily, clinical examination was performed weekly, and blood samples were collected every 30 days for laboratory examination. The plasma was analyzed for the presence of KT and DS by solid-phase extraction (SPE) associated with mass spectrometry (MS). Systemic absorption of these drugs was confirmed by SPE-MS, allowing their separation and identification in the plasma. At the end of the treatment, the animals were euthanized and necropsied, and no macroscopic or microscopic changes were found. This observation confirmed the laboratory results, which were within normal reference standards for the species. According to the results obtained, it can be concluded that treatment with eyedrops containing KT and DS for 90 days in healthy rabbits does not cause adverse systemic effects.(AU)
Comparou-se o efeito da absorção sistêmica do colírio de diclofenaco de sódio 0,1% (DS) em relação ao de cetorolaco de trometamina 0,5% (CT) em coelhas da raça Nova Zelândia, tratadas nos dois olhos, três vezes ao dia, por 90 dias. As coelhas foram separadas em três grupos de seis animais (n=18): grupo CT, grupo DS e grupo controle (Co), no qual foi instilada solução fisiológica (NaCl 0,9%). Os consumos de água e ração foram mensurados diariamente, os exames clínicos foram realizados semanalmente e o sangue foi coletado a cada 30 dias para realização de exames laboratoriais. O plasma foi analisado para detectar a presença de CT e DS por extração em fase sólida (SPE) associada à espectrometria de massas (MS). A absorção sistêmica desses fármacos foi confirmada por SPE-MS, permitindo sua separação e identificação no plasma. Ao final do tratamento, os animais foram eutanasiados e necropsiados, e não foram encontradas alterações macroscópicas ou microscópicas. Essa observação confirmou os resultados laboratoriais, que estavam dentro dos padrões de referência para a espécie. De acordo com os resultados obtidos, pode-se concluir que o tratamento com colírio contendo KT e DS, por 90 dias, em coelhos saudáveis, não causa efeitos adversos sistêmicos.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Rabbits , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Ketorolac Tromethamine/administration & dosage , Ketorolac Tromethamine/adverse effects , Absorption, Physiological/drug effectsABSTRACT
The effect of the systemic absorption of 0.1% diclofenac sodium (DS) eyedrop was compared to that of 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine (KT) in female New Zealand white rabbits treated on both eyes three times a day for 90 days. The rabbits were divided in three groups of six animals (n= 18): KT group, DS group, and control (Co) group, in which saline (0.9% NaCl) solution was instilled. Water and food consumption were measured daily, clinical examination was performed weekly, and blood samples were collected every 30 days for laboratory examination. The plasma was analyzed for the presence of KT and DS by solid-phase extraction (SPE) associated with mass spectrometry (MS). Systemic absorption of these drugs was confirmed by SPE-MS, allowing their separation and identification in the plasma. At the end of the treatment, the animals were euthanized and necropsied, and no macroscopic or microscopic changes were found. This observation confirmed the laboratory results, which were within normal reference standards for the species. According to the results obtained, it can be concluded that treatment with eyedrops containing KT and DS for 90 days in healthy rabbits does not cause adverse systemic effects.(AU)
Comparou-se o efeito da absorção sistêmica do colírio de diclofenaco de sódio 0,1% (DS) em relação ao de cetorolaco de trometamina 0,5% (CT) em coelhas da raça Nova Zelândia, tratadas nos dois olhos, três vezes ao dia, por 90 dias. As coelhas foram separadas em três grupos de seis animais (n=18): grupo CT, grupo DS e grupo controle (Co), no qual foi instilada solução fisiológica (NaCl 0,9%). Os consumos de água e ração foram mensurados diariamente, os exames clínicos foram realizados semanalmente e o sangue foi coletado a cada 30 dias para realização de exames laboratoriais. O plasma foi analisado para detectar a presença de CT e DS por extração em fase sólida (SPE) associada à espectrometria de massas (MS). A absorção sistêmica desses fármacos foi confirmada por SPE-MS, permitindo sua separação e identificação no plasma. Ao final do tratamento, os animais foram eutanasiados e necropsiados, e não foram encontradas alterações macroscópicas ou microscópicas. Essa observação confirmou os resultados laboratoriais, que estavam dentro dos padrões de referência para a espécie. De acordo com os resultados obtidos, pode-se concluir que o tratamento com colírio contendo KT e DS, por 90 dias, em coelhos saudáveis, não causa efeitos adversos sistêmicos.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Rabbits , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Ketorolac Tromethamine/administration & dosage , Ketorolac Tromethamine/adverse effects , Absorption, Physiological/drug effectsABSTRACT
Copaiba oil is widely used in medicine, but there are no reports regarding its application in ophthalmology. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical, histopathological and toxicogenetic effects of eye drops containing 0.1 and 0.5% of Copaifera multijuga Hayne oil on superficial corneal ulcers induced with alkali in the left eye of rats. For histological analysis, the percent reduction in ulcers and thickness of the corneal epithelium and stroma were evaluated 48 and 72 h after ulcer induction. Additionally, neovascularization and polymorphonuclear infiltration were classified in the stroma. The bone marrow micronucleus test was used for toxicogenetic assessment. None of the animals exhibited clinical signs of immediate ocular discomfort after instillation and the eye drops were harmless to the ocular surface. There was a significant difference in percent ulcer reduction and corneal stroma thickness between animals treated with the C. multijuga eye drops and untreated animals with corneal injury and the negative control, respectively, suggesting a healing effect of the oleoresin. Analysis of the thickness of the corneal epithelium at the two time points showed that the eye drops formulated did not significantly reduce the damage caused by alkali. The same was observed for the treatments with the reference drugs. No difference in stromal neovascularization or inflammatory infiltration was observed between the treated groups. The toxicogenetic results revealed the absence of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the treatments. In conclusion, the C. multijuga eye drops did not cause damage to the ocular surface under the present experimental conditions and corneal epithelization was similar to the conventional treatments. These results indicate that eye drops containing C. multijuga oleoresin are a promising option for the treatment of superficial keratitis.
Subject(s)
Cornea/drug effects , Fabaceae/chemistry , Wound Healing/drug effects , Animals , Cornea/pathology , Epithelium, Corneal/drug effects , Epithelium, Corneal/pathology , Male , Oils, Volatile/adverse effects , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Ophthalmic Solutions/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Toxicogenetics/methodsSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Self Administration/methods , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Vision, Low , Frail Elderly , Medication Adherence , Self Report , Administration, Ophthalmic , Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresABSTRACT
The purpose of the study is to measure corneal and conjunctival sensitivity in patients under glaucoma topical treatment as compared to a control group. It is a case-control study. Corneal and conjunctival esthesiometry were carried out through a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. We took healthy individuals as controls, who did not use any type of ophthalmic topical medications and without history of ocular surface pathology or irritation. The study group was subdivided per number of applications (1, 2, and 3 or more applications). From a total 182 eyes from 91 patients, of which 26 (28.57 %) were controls and 65 (71.43 %) were in the study group, a mean corneal sensitivity of 58.98 ± 2.25 mm was found in the control group and 52.97 ± 6.41 mm in patients using topical medication. Mean conjunctival sensitivity was 18.80 ± 5.40 mm in the control group and 11.76 ± 5.45 mm in the study group. There was no statistically significant difference among groups when separated by 1, 2, and 3 or more applications. Eyes under use of timolol-containing medications showed lower sensitivity values as compared to other topical antiglaucoma medications. Corneal and conjunctival sensitivities are diminished in patients with chronic use of topical hypotensive medications and these results can explain the lack of correlation between signs and symptoms that is typically found in patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Conjunctiva/drug effects , Cornea/drug effects , Glaucoma/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Treatment of fungal keratitis remains challenging. To date, only the polyenes and azoles are commonly used topically in the management of fungal keratitis. Natamycin, a polyene, is the only antifungal eye drop that is commercially available; the remainder are prepared in-house and are used in an 'off-label' manner. Failure of medical treatment for fungal keratitis is common, hence there is a need for more effective topical antifungal therapy. To increase the antifungal eye drop armamentarium, it is important to investigate the utility of other classes of antifungal agents for topical use. Caspofungin, an echinocandin antifungal agent, could potentially be used to address the existing shortcomings. However, little is known about the usefulness of topically administered caspofungin. This review will briefly explore the incidence, epidemiology and antifungal treatment of fungal keratitis. It will focus primarily on evidence related to the efficacy, safety and practicality of using caspofungin eye drops in fungal keratitis.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Echinocandins/therapeutic use , Keratitis/drug therapy , Mycoses/drug therapy , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Caspofungin , Echinocandins/administration & dosage , Echinocandins/adverse effects , Humans , Incidence , Keratitis/epidemiology , Keratitis/microbiology , Lipopeptides , Mycoses/epidemiology , Mycoses/microbiology , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Ophthalmic Solutions/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on the blood-aqueous (BAB) and blood-retinal barriers (BRB) of pseudophakic eyes. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, investigator-masked, comparative study. Patients were randomly assigned to preservative-free artificial tears or BAK-preserved artificial tears. One drop of artificial tears was instilled 4 times a day in the study eye, starting the day after randomization for 30 days. Anterior chamber flare was assessed by a laser flare meter (LFM) and macular thickness measurements were obtained with optical coherence tomography, before, 15, and 30 days after randomization. RESULTS: A total of 44 healthy eyes of 44 pseudophakic volunteers were recruited. There were no significant differences regarding demographics (age, gender, and race distributions) and clinical characteristics (eye, mean intraocular pressure, and mean best-corrected visual acuity) between the 2 groups (P>0.05). No significant differences in baseline mean LFM values were observed (P=0.262). However, we detected a statistically significant increase in mean LFM measurements in the BAK-preserved group (11.4 ± 5.1 ph/ms) (P=0.017) after 15 days. After 30 days, the BAK-preserved group maintained significantly higher flare values (11.9 ± 5.9 ph/ms) compared with baseline (P=0.043). On the other hand, the preservative-free group showed mean flare values of 8.4 ± 2.5 ph/ms, not significantly different from those obtained at baseline (P=1.00). We observed no statistically significant change in macular thickness measurements at days 15 and 30 in either group (P>0.05). Cystoid macular edema was not detected in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a short-term exposure to BAK can cause disruption of the BAB, without altering the BRB in pseudophakic eyes.
Subject(s)
Benzalkonium Compounds/administration & dosage , Blood-Aqueous Barrier/drug effects , Blood-Retinal Barrier/drug effects , Lubricant Eye Drops/administration & dosage , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/administration & dosage , Pseudophakia/drug therapy , Aged , Benzalkonium Compounds/adverse effects , Blood-Aqueous Barrier/pathology , Blood-Retinal Barrier/pathology , Female , Humans , Lubricant Eye Drops/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Pseudophakia/diagnosis , Single-Blind Method , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia do colírio bimatoprosta 0,03% (Glamigan, Germed, Brasil) na redução da pressão intraocular (PIO) em pacientes com glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto (GPAA) ou hipertensão ocular (HO), bem como avaliar os efeitos colaterais decorrentes do uso da droga no desenho epidemiológico randomizado, controlado. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados pacientes portadores de GPAA ou HO, acima de 18 anos de idade. Todos os pacientes receberam o colírio Glamigan® como primeira droga a ser introduzida no tratamento, tendo sido utilizada uma gota uma vez ao dia (à noite), e 30 dias após foram submetidos à tonometria de aplanação (Goldmann) para mensuração da PIO. RESULTADOS: A amostra do estudo foi composta por 35 (66 olhos) pacientes portadores de GPAA e HO, sendo 16 do sexo masculino (45,7%) e 19, do feminino (54,3%). A média de idade foi de 66,7 anos, sendo a idade máxima 84 anos. A média de redução da PIO após 30 dias de uso do Glamigan® foi de 6,5mmHg. Em relação aos efeitos colaterais, 17 (26,6%) pacientes referiram hiperemia conjuntival, 10 (15,6%) a dor, 8 (12,5%) o ardor, 5 (7,8%) o prurido ocular e 2 (3,1%) o embaçamento visual. CONCLUSÃO: A medicação Glamigan® foi eficiente na redução da PIO após 30 dias de uso contínuo, na dose de 1x/dia. Acerca dos efeitos colaterais, os mais observados foram hiperemia ocular (26,6%) e dor (15,6%), porém estudos com maior tempo de seguimento dos pacientes se fazem necessários a fim de investigar a importância daqueles na terapia com o Glamigan®.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how much decreases intraocular pressure (IOP) with bimatoprost 0,03% (Glamigan, Germed, Brazil) in patiens with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OH) and possible side effects. Study: Controlled and randomized study. METHODS: There were evaluated 66 eyes of 35 patients with age of 18 years old or more diagnosed with POAG and OH. All the patients had Glamigan® as first drop for treatment used once daily (at night) and 30 days later they had IOP measured by Goldmann tonometry. RESULTS: The study population had 35 (66 eyes) patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OH), 16 male patients (45,7%) and 19 female (54,3%). The mean age was 66,7 years old and the maximum was 84 years old. The mean decrease in IOP was 6,5 mmhg after 30 days using the drops. Seventeen patients had conjunctival redness (26,6%), 10 (15,6%) had pain, 8 (12,5%) had burning, 5 (7,8%) had itch and 2 (3,1%) had blurring vision. CONCLUSION: Glamigan® was efficient when evaluating IOP decrease. The most correlated side effects were conjunctival redness (26,6%) and pain (15,6%). We still need more studies to observe the real importance of those with Glamigan® therapy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Ophthalmic Solutions/therapeutic use , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Tonometry, OcularABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Identificar causas relacionadas com a não aderência ao tratamento do glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto e sugerir meios para posteriormente minimizá-las. MÉTODOS: Foi aplicado um questionário a pacientes portadores de glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto no Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle, escolhidos aleatoriamente, para avaliação dos fatores relacionados com a interrupção do tratamento. Para isso, utilizou-se uma análise univariada, pelo teste exato de Fisher, e considerou estatisticamente significativo p<0,05. RESULTADOS: A partir do questionário, identificou-se dois subgrupos, um que já havia interrompido o tratamento e outro que nunca o havia interrompido, compostos por 25 e 11 pacientes respectivamente. Estes grupos foram comparados entre si e todos os parâmetros analisados. O custo dos medicamentos (p=0,001) e o fator esquecimento (p=0,007) foram estatisticamente relevantes para a interrupção do tratamento da doença. As demais variáveis testadas não obtiveram significância estatística. CONCLUSÃO: O custo dos medicamentos e o fator esquecimento foram os fatores mais importantes para interrupção do tratamento.
The objective was to identify causes related to noncompliance of primary open-angle glaucoma and suggest ways to minimize them later. A questionnaire was given to patients with primary open angle glaucoma in Hospital Gaffrée Guinle, chosen randomly, to assess factors related to discontinuation of treatment. For this we used a univariate analysis by Fisher's exact test and considered statistically significant p <0.05. From the questionnaire, we identified two sub-groups, who had stopped treatment and another who had never stopped for 25 compounds and 11 patients respectively. These groups were compared, and all parameters examined. The cost of drugs (p = 0.001) and forgetting factor (p = 0.007) were statistically significant for discontinuation of treatment of disease. The other variables tested did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The cost of drugs and forgetting to take medication were the factors most important to withholding treatment.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Ophthalmic Solutions/economics , Ophthalmic Solutions/adverse effects , Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Prostaglandins/administration & dosage , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Surveys and Questionnaires , Risk Factors , Treatment Refusal/psychology , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/psychology , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Drug Costs , Adrenergic alpha-Agonists/administration & dosage , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Medication Adherence/psychologyABSTRACT
Antibiotic and non-antibiotic sulphonamides are often prescribed. Although chemical differences make cross-reactivity rare, reactions may be severe in patients allergic to sulphur. Adverse reactions are common with sulphonamides but low platelets and skin changes are rarely associated with eye-drops for glaucoma. A woman treated with dorzolamide and timolol presented with disseminated eruption. On admission, her physical examination was unremarkable except for the skin changes and severe thrombocytopaenia was detected. Skin biopsy showed hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, perivascular and periadnexal infiltrates with no vasculitis. After discontinuation of eye-drops, the eruption improved but low platelets persisted. Skin changes reappeared with use of dapsone which suggested sulphonamide cross-reactivity.