ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Circulating tumor DNA assays have robust potential as molecular surveillance tools. They may also exacerbate patient distress without improving outcomes. We investigate patient acceptability of a validated ctHPVDNA assay (NavDx) during cancer surveillance for HPV(+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS: Consented HPV(+) OPC participants completed the NCCN Distress Thermometer, the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale both (1) before NavDx blood draw, and (2) after results were provided. Patients then completed a series of focused questions related to their perceptions of the assay. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients completed the study, with 98.2 % showing no recurrence. For the NCCN Distress Thermometer, median patient distress decreased (2.0 (IQR 1-5) vs. 1.0 (IQR 0-3)) (p < 0.001) in association with NavDx. Using scores ≥ 4 as a cutoff point to define clinically elevated distress, scores also improved (36.4 % vs. 18.2 %, p = 0.031). For HADS, anxiety significantly improved (5.0 (IQR 2.0-7.0) vs. 3.0 (IQR 1.0-6.5)) (p = 0.037), but not depression (3.0 (IQR 1.0-7.0) vs. 3.0 (IQR 1.0-6.5)) (p = 0.870). FACT-G scores showed no substantial differences. On survey questionnaires, 95.5 % of patients believed the test to be helpful, and 100 % felt "somewhat" or "extremely" confident in the assay as a monitoring tool. While 59.1 % felt that it reduced anxiety, 88.4 % concordantly felt that it did not introduce anxiety. CONCLUSION: ctHPVDNA as a molecular surveillance tool reduced distress levels in HPV(+) OPC patients, with notably high patient confidence in the approach. Further investigation is warranted to judiciously incorporate this emerging modality in surveillance guidelines.
Subject(s)
Circulating Tumor DNA , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Circulating Tumor DNA/blood , Papillomavirus Infections/psychology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/psychology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/bloodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psychosocial factors and socioeconomic status have been associated with incidence, survival, and quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer. We investigated the association between different psychosocial factors, socioeconomic status, and patient delays in T3-T4 oral, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide prospective questionnaire-based study (n = 203) over a 3-year period. RESULTS: We found no association between psychosocial factors (depression, social isolation, loneliness, and cynical hostility) and patient delay. Depression was three times more common among head and neck cancer patients compared with the general Finnish population. Head and neck cancer patients had lower educational levels and employment status, and were more often current smokers and heavy drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: Although we found no association between patient delay and psychosocial factors, patients diagnosed with a large head and neck cancer appeared to have a lower socioeconomic status and higher risk for developing depression, which should be considered in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Laryngeal Neoplasms , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Laryngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Prospective Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Mouth Neoplasms/psychology , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Quality of Life , Finland/epidemiology , Social Class , Neoplasm Staging , Socioeconomic Factors , Time-to-TreatmentABSTRACT
Importance: Despite interest in therapy de-escalation for survivors of human papillomavirus-mediated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-positive OPSCC), the association of de-escalated therapy with patient-reported quality of life (QoL) outcomes and burden of depressive symptoms remains unclear. Objective: To identify associations between clinicopathologic and therapeutic variables with patient-reported QoL outcomes and depression symptom burden in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC, who were enrolled in a therapy de-escalation trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this nonrandomized controlled, open-label, curative-intent therapy de-escalation clinical trial in adults with stage I, II, and III HPV-positive OPSCC, patients were recruited from a high-volume head and neck oncology practice. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes of this study included quantitative, patient-reported QoL and depression symptoms per well-validated inventories. Patient-reported QoL was based on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head & Neck (FACT-HN) scores (range, 0-148; lower score indicates inferior QoL). Patient-reported depression-related symptom burden was based on Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) scores (range, 0-27; a higher score indicates a higher burden of depression symptoms). Baseline clinicopathologic and treatment variables were paired with FACT-HN and QIDS-SR scores at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Linear mixed-effect models with a random intercept were used for each participant and fixed effects for other measures. Regression coefficients are reported with 95% CIs. Results: A total of 95 patients were followed up for a median (IQR) of 2.2 (1.6-3.2) years. Of these, 93 patients (98%) were male with a mean (SD) age of 60.5 (8.2) years. Overall, 54 participants (57%) had a history of current or former smoking, 47 (50%) underwent curative-intent surgery (with or without adjuvant therapy), and 48 (50%) underwent primary radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy). The median (IQR) radiotherapy dose was 60 (60-70) Gy. Five deaths and 2 recurrence events were observed (mean [SD] recurrence interval, 1.4 [1.5] years). A higher radiotherapy dose was the only modifiable factor associated with inferior patient-reported QoL (lower FACT-HN) (coefficient, -0.66 [95% CI, -1.09 to -0.23]) and greater burden of depression-related symptoms (higher QIDS-SR) (coefficient, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.04-0.19]). With the 70-Gy dose as reference, improvements in FACT-HN and QIDS-SR scores were identified when patients received 51 to 60 Gy (coefficient, 12.75 [95% CI, 4.58-20.92] and -2.17 [-3.49 to -0.85], respectively) and 50 Gy or lower (coefficient, 15.03 [4.36-25.69] and -2.80 [-4.55 to -1.04]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled, open-label, curative-intent therapy de-escalation trial, a higher radiotherapy dose was associated with inferior patient-reported QoL and a greater burden of depression-related symptoms. This suggests opportunities for improved QoL outcomes and reduced depression symptom burden with a reduction in radiotherapy dose. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04638465.
Subject(s)
Depression , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Quality of Life , Humans , Male , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Middle Aged , Depression/etiology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/psychology , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/psychology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This secondary analysis of clinical trial TROG 12.01, involving patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, aimed to identify patient-reported outcome (PRO) trajectories before, during, and after chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Head and neck cancer symptom severity (HNSS) and interference (HNSI), generic health-related quality of life (HRQL), and emotional distress were assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaires, respectively. Latent class growth mixture modeling (LCGMM) was used to identify distinct underlying trajectories. Baseline and treatment variables were compared between trajectory groups. RESULTS: The LCGMM identified latent trajectories for all PROs: HNSS, HNSI, HRQL, anxiety, and depression. Four HNSS trajectories (HNSS1-4) were identified, distinguished by differences in HNSS at baseline, during the peak of treatment symptoms, and during early and intermediate recovery. All trajectories were stable beyond 12 months. The reference trajectory (HNSS4, n = 74) score was 0.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.2) at baseline, peaking at 4.6 (95% CI, 4.2-5.0), with rapid early recovery (1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-2.2) and gradual improvement to 12 months (0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.8). Patients in HNSS2 (high baseline, n = 30) reported higher baseline scores (1.4; 95% CI, 0.8-2.0) but were otherwise similar to HNSS4. Patients in HNSS3 (low acute, n = 53) reported reduced acute symptoms (2.5; 95% CI, 2.2-2.9) with stable scores beyond 9 weeks after chemoradiotherapy (1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.4). Patients in HNSS1 (slow recovery, n = 25) had slower recovery from an acute peak of 4.9 (95% CI, 4.3-5.6) to 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.3) at 12 months. Age, performance status, education, receipt of cetuximab, and baseline anxiety varied between trajectories. The other PRO models demonstrated clinically relevant trajectories, with distinct associations with baseline factors. CONCLUSIONS: LCGMM identified distinct PRO trajectories during and after chemoradiotherapy. These and their associations with variations in the characteristics and treatment factors of patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma provide clinically relevant insights into identifying patients who may require increased support before, during, or after chemoradiotherapy.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Psychological Distress , Humans , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The human papillomavirus (HPV) is well recognised as a factor in developing oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). A booklet for HPV-OPC patients aimed to deliver evidence-based messages in everyday language, in a way to minimise negative psychological impacts on patients. Our study explored the suitability of the booklet for use. METHODS: Participants were recruited through social media and interviewed via Zoom. Participants were shown the booklet and a think-aloud method elicited real-time reactions to the content. Responses were analysed for each section and coded as either for or against for content, with other responses thematically analysed using NVivo. RESULTS: The sample comprised 24 participants: patients (n = 19) who completed treatment for HPV-OPC and partners of survivors of HPV-OPC (n = 5). All participants found the booklet useful, and most wished the resource had been available previously. Some indicated the information was new to them. The majority agreed the booklet would be best delivered by their specialist at point of diagnosis and would be a useful resource for friends and family. Most participants gave feedback on improvements to the booklet in terms of comprehension and design. Overall, participants found the content easy to understand. Most participants found that it helped to reduce shame and stigma associated with HPV as a sexually transmitted infection. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based booklet for HPV-OPC patients and their partners is acceptable. Implementation may be feasible in routine clinical practice, specifically at time of diagnosis. Adapting the content will help optimise the efficacy of the booklet in facilitating communication between all stakeholders.
Subject(s)
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Humans , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of gastrostomy tube dependence after transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and to determine which patient or surgical factors increase the likelihood of gastrostomy tube dependence. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent TORS for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) at a single institution from January 2011 through July 2016. Patients who underwent TORS for recurrent OPSCC were excluded. Primary outcome was gastrostomy tube (g-tube) dependence. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors for g-tube dependence at 3-months and 1-year. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients underwent TORS during the study period. At 3-month follow-up, 58/226 patients (25.7%) required g-tube. At 1-year and 2-year follow-up, 8/203 (3.9%) and 5/176 (2.8%), remained dependent on g-tube, respectively. Advanced T stage (T3) (OR = 6.07; 95% CI, 1.28-28.9) and discharge from the hospital with enteral access (OR = 7.50; 95% CI, 1.37-41.1) were independently associated with increased risk of postoperative gastrostomy tube dependence at 1 year on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term gastrostomy tube dependence following TORS is rare, particularly in patients that receive surgery alone. Patients with advanced T stage tumors have poorer functional outcomes. Early functional outcomes, as early as discharge from the hospital, are a strong predictor for long-term functional outcomes.
Subject(s)
Dependency, Psychological , Gastrostomy/methods , Gastrostomy/psychology , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/methods , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/psychology , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/psychology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Postoperative Period , Risk Factors , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The current state of the U.S. public's knowledge of the relationship between human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV vaccinations to oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is unknown. Our objective was to 1) assess the general population's knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) and willingness to vaccinate, and 2) assess whether targeted education on HPV-related OPSCC can change intentions to vaccinate. STUDY DESIGN: Online cross-sectional survey. METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey utilizing U.S. census-derived quotas to represent the U.S. population was distributed and analyzed to 517 adults in 2020. RESULTS: Exactly 72.7% of participants stated that they had or would vaccinate their child against HPV and were designated as "vaccinators." In multivariate regression, Black individuals were less likely to be vaccinators (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.27-0.94]), but those who were aware of HPV's role in OPSCC were more likely to vaccinate (OR 2.56 [95% CI 1.47-4.46]). Knowledge about vaccination side-effects, eligibility, and mechanisms of HPV spread was low. Only 30.6% of the sample reported understanding the role of HPV in OPSCC. Of these, 43.0% gained this knowledge exclusively from nonhealthcare professional sources, like television. When presented with four short HPV-OPSCC-centered facts (HPV's role in OPSCC etiology, prevalence of infection, clinically silent course, and vaccine preventative effects), 54.0% of "nonvaccinators" indicated a willingness to change their minds. CONCLUSIONS: General knowledge about HPV, HPV's role in OPSCC, and the vaccine remains low in the general population. There are racial disparities in willingness to vaccinate within this sample, but these may be overcome by effective education on HPV-related OPSCC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:528-537, 2022.
Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Patient Education as Topic , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/psychology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Intention , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study examines patient-reported outcomes and functioning-based subgroups in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer survivors treated with chemoradiotherapy ≥12 months prior. METHOD: Survivors completed EORTC QLQ-C30, MDASI-HN and PROMIS-Emotional distress questionnaires. Subgroups were identified via two-step clustering of QLQ-C30 functioning scales. RESULTS: 136 patients were enrolled. Clinicians' graded 19/136 (14%) patients as having at least one severe (Grade 3 CTCAE) toxicity, whereas 68/136 (50%) patients self-reported at least one toxicity in the severe range (MDASI-HN ≥ 7). QLQ-C30 Global health status score (mean 76, SD = 20) was comparable to population norms. Rates of moderate/severe anxiety (10%/1%) and depression (4%/1%) were low. Two functioning-based subgroups were formed based on auto-clustering statistics: high- (n = 93) and low-functioning (n = 41). Differences on all functioning scales were large (d: 1.57-2.29), as were differences on the remaining QLQ-C30 scales/items, most MDASI-HN symptom severity/interference scales, and PROMIS scales (d: 0.80-2.03). Differences and associations with patient/clinical characteristics were not significant. CONCLUSION: In this Australian cohort of HPV-OPC survivors there was significant discordance between clinician- and patient-reported toxicity. We observed population comparable global quality of life and low rates of emotional distress. However, we identified a low-functioning subgroup reporting significantly worse outcomes on a range of patient-reported measures who may benefit from targeted support.
Subject(s)
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Psychological Distress , Quality of Life , Alphapapillomavirus , Australia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Surveys and Questionnaires , SurvivorsABSTRACT
Importance: Recent insights into the biologic characteristics and treatment of oropharyngeal cancer may help inform improvements in prognostic modeling. A bayesian multistate model incorporates sophisticated statistical techniques to provide individualized predictions of survival and recurrence outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed oropharyngeal cancer. Objective: To develop a model for individualized survival, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis prognostication for patients with newly diagnosed oropharyngeal cancer, incorporating clinical, oncologic, and imaging data. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, a data set was used comprising 840 patients with newly diagnosed oropharyngeal cancer treated at a National Cancer Institute-designated center between January 2003 and August 2016; analysis was performed between January 2019 and June 2020. Using these data, a bayesian multistate model was developed that can be used to obtain individualized predictions. The prognostic performance of the model was validated using data from 447 patients treated for oropharyngeal cancer at Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands. Exposures: Clinical/oncologic factors and imaging biomarkers collected at or before initiation of first-line therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis after first-line cancer treatment. Results: Of the 840 patients included in the National Cancer Institute-designated center, 715 (85.1%) were men and 268 (31.9%) were current smokers. The Erasmus Medical Center cohort comprised 300 (67.1%) men, with 350 (78.3%) current smokers. Model predictions for 5-year overall survival demonstrated good discrimination, with area under the curve values of 0.81 for the model with and 0.78 for the model without imaging variables. Application of the model without imaging data in the independent Dutch validation cohort resulted in an area under the curve of 0.75. This model possesses good calibration and stratifies patients well in terms of likely outcomes among many competing events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prognostic study, a multistate model of oropharyngeal cancer incorporating imaging biomarkers appeared to estimate and discriminate locoregional recurrence from distant metastases. Providing personalized predictions of multiple outcomes increases the information available for patients and clinicians. The web-based application designed in this study may serve as a useful tool for generating predictions and visualizing likely outcomes for a specific patient.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Survival Analysis , Bayes Theorem , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Netherlands , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oral and oropharyngeal cancer is a debilitating disease with high morbidity and mortality. Depending on the site and extent of the involvement of the cancer and the type of treatment modality, these patients can develop pain, trismus, xerostomia, dysphagia, and taste disturbances, compromising them socially and nutritionally. The aim of the study was to evaluate malnutrition and quality of life in patients treated for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Methodology. A cross-sectional study was conducted which included 97 patients treated for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. The quality of life of the selected patients was assessed by using a validated European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire, Head and Neck and Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire. Pre- and posttreatment weight of the patients were assessed, and weight loss of ≥10% of pretreatment weight was considered as malnutrition. The chi-square test was used to correlate the symptoms with the quality of life. A paired t test was used to assess the differences in weight before and after treatment, and a p value of <0.005 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The most commonly reported symptoms were xerostomia (93.81%), pain (81.44%), and dysphagia (76.3%). A total of 40.2% of the individuals in the study had malnutrition. Malnutrition was comparatively lower in the group who had nutritional supplements. CONCLUSION: The quality of life in patients treated for oral and oropharyngeal cancer deteriorates immediately after the treatment; however, it significantly improves over time.
Subject(s)
Malnutrition/etiology , Mouth Neoplasms/complications , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/complications , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Malnutrition/psychology , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Xerostomia/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Proton therapy is a promising advancement in radiation oncology especially in terms of reducing normal tissue toxicity, although it is currently expensive and of limited availability. Here we estimated the individual quality of life benefit and cost-effectiveness of proton therapy in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT), as a decision-making tool for treatment individualization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Normal tissue complication probability models were used to estimate the risk of dysphagia, esophagitis, hypothyroidism, xerostomia and oral mucositis for 33 patients, comparing delivered photon intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) plans to intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost were calculated for each complication while accounting for patient-specific conditional survival probability and assigning quality-adjustment factors based on complication severity. Cost-effectiveness was modeled based on upfront costs of IMPT and IMRT, and the cost of acute and/or long-term management of treatment complications. Uncertainties in all model parameters and sensitivity analyses were included through Monte Carlo sampling. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) showed considerable variability in the cost of QALYs spared between patients, with median $361,405/QALY for all patients, varying from $54,477/QALY to $1,508,845/QALY between individual patients. Proton therapy was more likely to be cost-effective for patients with p16-positive tumors ($234,201/QALY), compared to p16-negative tumors ($516,297/QALY). For patients with p16-positive tumors treated with comprehensive nodal irradiation, proton therapy is estimated to be cost-effective in ≥ 50% of sampled cases for 8/9 patients at $500,000/QALY, compared to 6/24 patients who either have p16-negative tumors or receive unilateral neck irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Proton therapy cost-effectiveness varies greatly among oropharyngeal cancer patients, and highlights the importance of individualized decision-making. Although the upfront cost, societal willingness to pay and healthcare administration can vary greatly among different countries, identifying patients for whom proton therapy will have the greatest benefit can optimize resource allocation and inform prospective clinical trial design.
Subject(s)
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Proton Therapy , Quality of Life , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs , Humans , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Radiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the course of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) from diagnosis to 2 years follow-up among patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC), in relation to human papilloma virus (HPV) status. METHODS: This study included 270 OPSCC patients. Age, sex, tumor sublocation, tumor stage, HPV status, treatment modality, comorbidity, smoking, and alcohol use were retrieved from medical records. HPV status was positive when p16 and HPV DNA tests were both positive. HRQOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-H&N35 pretreatment and at 6 weeks, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment. To compare the course of HRQOL between patients with an HPV-positive versus HPV-negative tumor, linear and logistic mixed models were used. RESULTS: Patients with an HPV-positive tumor (29%) were more often male, diagnosed with a tumor of the tonsil or base of the tongue, treated with single treatment, had fewer comorbidities, were less often current smokers and had lower alcohol consumption. Adjusted for confounders, the course of global quality of life, physical, role, and social functioning, fatigue, pain, insomnia, and appetite loss was significantly different: patients with an HPV-positive tumor scored better before treatment, worsened during treatment, and recovered better and faster at follow-up, compared to patients with an HPV-negative tumor. The course of emotional functioning and oral pain was also significantly different between the two groups, but with other trajectories. CONCLUSION: The course of HRQOL is different in patients with an HPV-positive tumor versus an HPV-negative tumor, adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle confounders.
Subject(s)
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/psychology , Quality of Life , Aged , Comorbidity , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/complicationsABSTRACT
Oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) is now the most common site of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Despite the focus on treatment deintensification in clinical trials, little is known about the preferences, experiences and needs of patients with OPSCC when deciding between surgery and radiation therapy as primary treatment with curative intent. In this qualitative study, pre-treatment and post-treatment oropharyngeal cancer patients were recruited to take part in one-on-one interviews (n = 11 pre-treatment) and focus group discussions (n = 15 post-treatment) about treatment decision-making. Recordings were transcribed and assessed for emergent themes using framework analysis. From the one-on-one interviews and focus group discussions with OPSCC patients, fourteen themes were identified. Participants expressed alarm at diagnosis, decisional conflict, and a variety of roles in decision-making (physician-controlled, shared, and autonomous). Decisions were driven by the perceived recommendation of the treatment team, a desire for physical (surgical) tumor removal, fear of adverse effects of treatment, and patient-specific values. Although participants felt well-informed by their treating physicians, they identified a need for additional patient-centered information. Participants were critical of the poor quality of information available on the internet, and acknowledged the advantage of hearing the experiences of post-treatment patients. The experiences identified herein may be used to guide patient-centered communication during patient counseling and to inform interventions designed to support patients' needs at diagnosis, ultimately helping to implement high-quality, patient-centered care.
Subject(s)
Decision Making , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Patient Preference , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery , Aged , Communication , Conflict, Psychological , Consumer Health Information/standards , Decision Making, Shared , Fear , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Qualitative Research , Socioeconomic Factors , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/diagnosis , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To examine sexual health, including sexual satisfaction, and perceived changes in relationships and sexual relationships of human papillomavirus (HPV) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors ≥12 months after (chemo)radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We undertook a cross-sectional study of HPV-OPC survivors who had completed treatment ≥12 months prior. Eligible patients completed the EORTC QLQ-SHQ22, a customized relationship questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-C30, MDASI-HN, and PROMIS Anxiety and Depression scales. RESULTS: We enrolled 136 survivors (median age, 61 years [range, 42-87 years]; male, 84%; currently partnered, 72%). The median time from (chemo)radiation therapy completion was 2.8 years (range, 1.0-5.5 years). Most patients (71/131; 60%) reported an active sex life as important; however, only 20% (26/133) reported significant recent sexual activity ("quite a bit"/"very much"). The mean sexual satisfaction score was 47/100 (interquartile range, 27-67; standard deviation 28). On univariable analysis, greater sexual satisfaction was positively associated with greater importance of sexual activity, stronger libido, greater relationship security, and more erection confidence (males). Lower sexual satisfaction was significantly associated with female sex (P = .04), more medical comorbidities (P = .008), and more time since treatment completion (P = .006). Only a few patients reported a change in their marital status (10/136; 7%). The majority (62/109; 57%) of patients partnered at diagnosis reported no change in their precancer relationship. Among those reporting a change, it was more frequently perceived as positive (29/109; 27%) than negative (16/109; 15%). Regarding their sexual relationship, 54 of 107 (50%) reported no change, 40 of 107 (37%) reported a negative change, and 8 of 107 (7%) reported a positive change. CONCLUSIONS: Although an active sex life is important to many HPV-OPC survivors, fewer reported significant recent sexual activity. Sexual satisfaction scores were moderate in this cohort. Although recall bias was possible, most patients reported either no change or a positive change in their interpersonal relationship. Prospective studies evaluating sexual health outcomes and addressing informational needs in HPV-OPC survivors are needed.
Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy , Interpersonal Relations , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Sexual Health , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/diagnosis , Cancer Survivors , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/diagnosis , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Libido , Male , Marital Status , Middle Aged , Orgasm , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomaviridae , Penile Erection , Quality of Life , Self Report , Sex Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV), vaccination, and HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and to evaluate HPV vaccine acceptability among a sample of undergraduate dental students. METHODS: All third- and fourth-year dental students enrolled in any of the dental schools in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. In total, 500 students completed a self-administered questionnaire on HPV, HPV vaccines, and HPV-related OPC knowledge. HPV, HPV vaccine and HPV-related OPC knowledge scores were calculated. Associations of participants characteristics with the knowledge scores and with willingness to take the HPV vaccine were assessed. RESULTS: Of the participants, 62% had heard of HPV infections, and 57% of HPV vaccines. Average knowledge scores were low: HPV knowledge score 3.8±4.5 out of 16, HPV vaccination knowledge score 0.9±1.6 out of 7, OPC knowledge score 0.9±1.2 out of 5. Clinical-year students had better knowledge and were more willing to take the HPV vaccine than were preclinical-year students, as were those vaccinated for hepatitis B versus those not vaccinated for hepatitis B. Students with higher HPV knowledge scores were more willing to take the HPV vaccine (66%) than were those with lower scores (43%) (p=0.018). Only 4% of males and 12% of females reported taking the HPV vaccine. Of those who refused it, 51% cited lack of knowledge as the primary reason. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge about HPV, its vaccine, and HPV-related OPC is low among this sample of Saudi undergraduate dental students. Improving knowledge among them may increase their awareness, which could affect the care provided to patients.
.
Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Students, Dental/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Students, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) make up about 3% of all new cancer cases in the United States, with increasing numbers of these patients being diagnosed aged younger than 45 years and with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive disease. Treatment effects may alter patients' physical and mental states during and after treatment. OBJECTIVES: This article provides an overview of possible OPC treatment long-term effects to equip oncology nurses with information needed to empower patients with OPC to perform self-care. METHODS: The OPC literature was reviewed to identify incidence, survival, risk factors, symptoms, treatment options, and treatment effects. FINDINGS: This article provides a foundation for the plan of care for patients with OPC and strategies for patients to contribute to their self-care.
Subject(s)
Oncology Nursing , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Self Care , Adult , Education, Nursing , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurse's Role , Oncology Nursing/education , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/psychology , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Oropharynx squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) is a type of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The raising OPSCC incidence is mainly attributed to human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV-related OPSCC has a relatively good prognosis, the concerns are focused on the improvement of quality-of-life (QOL). We aimed to figure out the factors which may affect the QOL of HPV-related OPSCC patients after treatment. METHODS: This study included patients with HPV-related OPSCC. The QOL of the patients were analyzed through the administration of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)-Chinese version, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Module-35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N-35)-Chinese version, and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10). Multivariable regression analysis was employed to detect the influence of predictor variables on the QOL of patients. RESULTS: A total of 294 HPV-related OPSCC patients were involved in this research. The results of EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-H&N-35, and EAT-10 demonstrated that the treatment decreased the QOL of HPV-related OPSCC patients. Several different factors including marital status, consumption of tobacco and alcohol, tumor sites, clinical stages, therapeutic strategies, and neck dissection were proved to have influence on QOL of HPV-related OPSCC after treatment. CONCLUSION: Based on the analyzation of the QOL at baseline and after treatment, we demonstrated several factors which influenced the QOL of HPV-associated OPSCC patients after treatment. These results can make a great contribution to the improvement of the QOL after treatment.
Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/pathogenicity , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Quality of Life/psychology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/virologyABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention on HPV infection, HPV-related cancers and prevention modalities to improve Oral Health Care Providers (OHPs) knowledge and awareness about these topics, considering the rise of HPV-related malignancies in the USA. Educational sessions on HPV were offered to OHPs between 2016 and 2018 in the New England area. Participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire both before and after each session. Responses from the pre-questionnaire were compared to those from the post-questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness of the lectures in increasing HPV-related knowledge of the OHPs. Among 277 participants, 263 completed both the pre- and post-questionnaire. A significant improvement was observed for the following categories: epidemiology of HPV infections, HPV-related diseases, and HPV vaccination and prevention. After the educational intervention, OHPs also indicated an increased comfort level in regard to educating their patients about the importance of HPV vaccination. Educational lectures can be effective in increasing OHPs knowledge and awareness about HPV, HPV-related cancers, and vaccination. More educational sessions on HPV are needed to reach a larger number of OHPs. OHPs may be the first to identify signs and symptoms of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers. In addition, they may encourage their patients to take advantage of the HPV vaccine.
Subject(s)
Health Education , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/education , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccination/psychology , Adult , Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Female , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New England , Oral Health , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/psychology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been associated with certain types of oropharyngeal cancers and yet, the level of knowledge that dental professionals and the lay public have in terms of HPV transmission, oral sexual activities, and oral cancer development needs exploration. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge held by practicing dental professionals as well as the lay public regarding Human Papillomavirus (HPV) transmission through oral sex and subsequent oropharyngeal cancer development. METHODS: Textual data were collected from a public forum with dental professionals in. Vancouver, who discussed the HPV-oral sex-oral cancer triad, and from survey data gathered from 212 lay public participants (also in Vancouver) who answered a 13-item questionnaire on the perceived risks of oral sex in terms of HPV infection and oropharyngeal cancer development. The data were analyzed statistically by age group, gender, and sexual orientation using descriptive statistics, while an ANOVA test was used to compare variation in the responses to the survey (p-value = 0.05). RESULTS: The forum engaged 46 health care professionals, many of whom were aware of the potential risks for head and neck cancer development due to HPV infection, while also questioning "how to effectively talk about HPV with patients." The survey revealed that 34.5% of the participants believed that oral sex is an activity with no or low risk for the transmission of HPV, while 84% of participants believed the same sexual practices were of low or no-risk for HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) transmission. Most participants (82%) never discussed oral sexual activities with their physicians or dentists/dental hygienists. CONCLUSIONS: The general public remains mostly unaware of the potential links between HPV infection and oropharyngeal cancer. Physicians and dental providers should discuss oral sexual practice with their patients to raise awareness.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mouth Neoplasms/psychology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/psychology , Papillomavirus Infections/psychology , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Adult , Dental Staff/psychology , Female , HIV Infections/psychology , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/virology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/transmission , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to quantify the association of late lower cranial neuropathy (late LCNP) with swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) and functional status among long-term oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors. METHODS: Eight hundred eighty-nine OPC survivors (median survival time: 7 years) who received primary treatment at a single institution between January 2000 and December 2013 completed a cross-sectional survey (56% response rate) that included the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and self-report of functional status. Late LCNP events ≥3 months after cancer therapy were abstracted from medical records. Multivariate models regressed MDADI scores on late LCNP status adjusting for clinical covariates. RESULTS: Overall, 4.0% (n = 36) of respondents developed late LCNP with median time to onset of 5.25 years post-treatment. LCNP cases reported significantly worse mean composite MDADI (LCNP: 68.0 vs no LCNP: 80.2; P < .001). Late LCNP independently associated with worse mean composite MDADI (ß = -6.7, P = .02; 95% confidence interval [CI], -12.0 to -1.3) as well as all MDADI domains after multivariate adjustment. LCNP cases were more likely to have a feeding tube at time of survey (odds ratio [OR] = 20.5; 95% CI, 8.6-48.9), history of aspiration pneumonia (OR = 23.5; 95% CI, 9.6-57.6), and tracheostomy (OR = 26.9; 95% CI, 6.0-121.7). CONCLUSIONS: In this large survey study, OPC survivors with late LCNP reported significantly poorer swallowing-related QOL and had significantly higher likelihood of poor functional status. Further efforts are necessary to optimize swallowing outcomes to improve QOL in this subgroup of survivors.