ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Este trabalho tem como propósito fornecer uma análise abrangente das características clínicas, etiológicas, radiográficas e histopatológicas da osteonecrose dos maxilares relacionada ao uso de medicamentos, além de abordar os métodos de diagnóstico, prevenção e estratégias terapêuticas. Materiais e métodos: foi realizada uma busca por artigos científicos publicados no período de 2015 a 2023, utilizando as bases de dados Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) e ScienceDirect. Conclusão: Embora infrequente, há um considerável potencial de ocorrência de osteonecrose dos maxilares em pacientes submetidos a terapia prolongada com medicamentos antirreabsortivos e antiangiogênicos, especialmente quando não são adotadas medidas preventivas adequadas. A implementação de práticas preventivas, a vigilância das condições bucais e a colaboração de uma equipe multidisciplinar são fundamentais para reduzir os riscos associados a essa condição patológica.(AU)
Objective: This work aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the clinical, etiological, radiographic and histopathological characteristics of Medication-Related Jaw Osteonecrosis, in addition to addressing diagnostic methods, prevention and therapeutic strategies. Materials and methods: A search was carried out for scientific articles published between 2015 and 2023, using the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and ScienceDirect databases. Conclusion: Although infrequent, there is a considerable potential for osteonecrosis of the jaw to occur in patients undergoing prolonged therapy with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic medications, especially when adequate preventive measures are not adopted. The implementation of preventive practices, surveillance of oral conditions and the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team are essential to reduce the risks associated with this pathological condition.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Jaw Diseases/chemically induced , Jaw Diseases/therapy , Risk Factors , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Denosumab/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of osteonecrosis of the jaw in bisphosphonate users submitted to dental procedures. METHODS: This systematic review searched the sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library, with no restriction on language or publication date. Reviewers, in pairs and independently, selected the studies, extracted their data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies (5391 participants) were included. The most reported bisphosphonates were zoledronate (n = 17 studies) and alendronate (n = 19) for treating cancers (n = 11) and osteoporosis (n = 16), respectively. Twelve studies were of low methodological quality. The frequency of osteonecrosis was 2.7% (95% CI: 0.9-5.2%) and proved higher for intravenous [6.9% (0.7-17.3%)] than oral [0.2% (0.9-5.2%)] bisphosphonate use. No association between longer treatment duration and greater frequency of osteonecrosis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Higher frequency of osteonecrosis was observed in intravenous bisphosphonate users submitted to dental extraction. Further studies collecting more detailed information on the bisphosphonates used and of greater methodological rigor are warranted to confirm these findings and better inform prescribers, dental surgeons, and other professionals on risks of bisphosphonate use in this patient group.
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteonecrosis , Osteoporosis , Humans , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/epidemiology , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Zoledronic Acid/adverse effects , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/epidemiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The justification for this consensus is the absence of local protocols on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MONJ), for prevention, evaluation, and treatment, involving physicians and dentists, leading to suspension of antiresorptive treatments, despite their benefit in the prevention of fragility fractures (40-70%). These fractures cause disability and mortality (80% and 20-30%, respectively), as opposed to the low risk associated with MONJ in osteoporotic (0.01-0.03%) and oncological patients (1.3-1.8%). PURPOSE: To provide management recommendations through algorithms that guide health professionals to prevent, diagnose, and treat MONJ in different clinical scenarios. METHOD: A technical multidisciplinary team composed of specialists with extensive experience in osteoporosis or osteonecrosis of the jaw from Fundación Santa Fé (Bogotá, Colombia) and the Asociación Colombiana de Osteoporosis y Metabolismo Mineral was selected. Three rounds were carried out: definition of questions, answers using Delphi methodology, and the discussion of questions in order to have an agreement. The whole group participated in two phases, and the developer group in the total number of rounds. A literature review was conducted to obtain academic support to design questions with clinical relevance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The consensus group generated definitions and recommendations useful for doctors and dentists, following clinical algorithms involving four scenarios: osteoporosis patient who requires dental procedures and has not received antiresorptives, osteoporosis patient who are under treatment with antiresorptives, cancer patients, and MONJ-instituted patients. The therapeutic approach in osteoporosis and cancer patients, in invasive dental procedures, must be relied on the risk-benefit treatment.
Subject(s)
Osteonecrosis , Algorithms , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Colombia , Denosumab , Diphosphonates , Humans , Jaw Diseases , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis of bone is a frequent and severe complication of sickle cell disease and its treatment is not standardised. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of any surgical procedure compared with other surgical interventions or non-surgical procedures, on avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease in terms of efficacy and safety. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Additional trials were sought from both ongoing trial registries and the reference lists of papers identified by the search strategy. Date of the most recent search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 17 September 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials comparing specific therapies for avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each author independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Given only one trial was identified, meta-analyses were not possible. MAIN RESULTS: One trial (46 participants) was eligible for inclusion. After randomization eight participants were withdrawn, mainly because they declined to participate in the trial. Data were analysed for 38 participants at the end of the trial. After a mean follow-up of three years, hip core decompression and physical therapy did not show clinical improvement when compared with physical therapy alone using the score from the original trial (an improvement of 18.1 points for those treated with intervention therapy versus an improvement of 15.7 points with control therapy). We are very uncertain whether there is any difference between groups regarding major complications (hip pain, risk ratio 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.60; vaso-occlusive crises, risk ratio 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.80; very low quality of evidence); and acute chest syndrome, risk ratio 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.44 to 2.56; very low quality of evidence)). This trial did not report results on mortality or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that adding hip core decompression to physical therapy achieves clinical improvement in people with sickle cell disease with avascular necrosis of bone compared to physical therapy alone. However, we highlight that our conclusion is based on one trial with high attrition rates. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the role of hip-core depression for this clinical condition. Endpoints should focus on participants' subjective experience (e.g. quality of life and pain) as well as more objective 'time-to-event' measures (e.g. mortality, survival, hip longevity). The availability of participants to allow adequate trial power will be a key consideration for endpoint choice.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Osteonecrosis/etiology , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), low-intensity laser (LIL), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ). METHODS: A literature search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Two examiners independently assessed eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data. RESULTS: There was improvement in 75.6% of the 41 patients submitted to HBO, with positive effects on pain relief and decreased size and number of lesions at a faster rate, with better effects when the drug was discontinued. For LIL, 158 (64.2%) of the 246 patients/sites improved the symptoms and 98 (39.8%) healed completely. Fourteen (17.3%) of the 81 patients treated with PRP significantly improved the symptoms and 65 (80.2%) completely healed. CONCLUSIONS: These therapies served as safe and effective adjuvant modalities for MRONJ treatment. The lack of randomized clinical trials evidences the need for more high-quality investigations on the subject.
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Hyperbaric Oxygenation/methods , Laser Therapy/methods , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/pathology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Denosumab/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Jaw Diseases/chemically induced , Jaw Diseases/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Pain Management , Pamidronate/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Pediatric hip fractures are uncommon injuries but are associated with a high complication rate including avascular necrosis, coxa vara, nonunion, and premature physeal arrest. This is due in part to the unique anatomy of the proximal femur. Management principles are aimed at minimizing the risk of complications and emphasize the importance of early treatment with anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation with a low threshold for supplementing fixation with a spica cast. The age of the patient and Delbet fracture type dictate the optimal type of fixation for a given case. This article will offer evidence and experience-based tips intended to benefit on-call surgeons caring for these injuries.
Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Healing/physiology , Hip Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Age Factors , Bone Nails , Child , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Female , Femoral Neck Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Hip Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Orthopedic Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Osteonecrosis/etiology , Osteonecrosis/pathology , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prognosis , Rare DiseasesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to evaluate safety, feasibility and clinical results of bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMC) implantation for early-stage osteonecrosis of the knee (OK) secondary to sickle cell disease. METHODS: Thirty-three SCD patients (45 knees) with OK treated with BMC implantation in the osteonecrotic lesion were clinically and functionally evaluated through the American Knee Society Clinical Score (KSS), Knee Functional Score (KFS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score. MRI and radiographic examinations of the knee were assessed during a period of five years after intervention. RESULTS: No complications or serious adverse event were associated with BMC implantation. From preoperative assessment to the latest follow-up, there was a significant (p < 0.001) improvement of clinical KSS (64.3 ± 9.7, range: 45-80 and 2.2 ± 4.1, range: 84-100, respectively), KFS (44.5 ± 8.0, range: 30-55 and 91.6 ± 5.8, range: 80-100, respectively) and reduction of NRS pain score (6.7 ± 1.2, range: 4-9 and 3.4 ± 1.0, range: 2-5, respectively). In total, 87% of patients (29/33) consistently experienced improvements in joint function and activity level as compared to preoperative score. No patient had additional surgery following BMC implantation. Radiographic assessment showed joint preservation and no progression to subchondral collapse at most recent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of BMC implantation is a promising, relatively simple and safe procedure for OK in SCD patients. Larger and long-term controlled trials are needed to support its clinical effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02448121 . Retrospectively registered 19 May 2015.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/diagnostic imaging , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Osteonecrosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous/methods , Young AdultABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) with multiple sessions of low-level laser on the alveolar repair process of rats with major risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ). Senile rats received 0.45â¯mL of vehicle (VEH and VEH-PBM) or 0.45â¯mL of 100⯵g/kg zoledronate (ZOL and ZOL-PBM) administrated intraperitoneally every two days during seven weeks. After three weeks of initiation of drug treatment the first lower left molar was extracted. No local treatment was performed in VEH and ZOL. VEH-PBM and ZOL-PBM were submitted to laser irradiation (660⯱â¯10â¯nm; 0.035â¯W; 2.1â¯J; 60â¯s) on the extraction site at 0, 2 and 4â¯days postoperatively. Euthanasia was performed 28â¯days after tooth extraction. Histological sections of the hemimandible were submitted to histopathological and histomorphometric analysis, as well as to histochemistry for collagen fiber maturation and immunohistochemistry for pro-inflammatory cytokines. In ZOL, general impairment of tissue repair, areas with osteonecrosis, lower newly formed bone tissue (NFBT), smaller amount of mature collagen fibers and increased immunoreactivity for TNFα, IL-1ß and IL-6 were observed when compared to VEH and VEH-PBM. ZOL-PBM showed significant improvement in some parameters compared to ZOL, such as positive repair tissue, higher NFBT, greater amount of mature collagen fibers, besides TNFα and IL-1ß immunoreactivity decrease. Zoledronate treatment severely compromised the tissue repair process of the tooth extraction site in rats with major risk factors for MRONJ. Based on parameters employed in the present study, PBM in multiple sessions can improve the alveolar repair process, constituting a promising preventive therapy to avoid the onset of post-extraction MRONJ.
Subject(s)
Jaw , Low-Level Light Therapy , Osteonecrosis/prevention & control , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Tooth Extraction , Animals , Immunohistochemistry , Jaw/injuries , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Rats , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Zoledronic Acid/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Introdução: No presente trabalho, relatamos um caso de reconstrução do terço proximal do úmero direito e reanimação do cotovelo de um paciente masculino, de 20 anos, vítima de acidente automobilístico, com necrose óssea de 5 cm no terço proximal do úmero e avulsão do bíceps braquial. Métodos: Utilizamos o retalho ósseo da escápula, associado ao retalho miocutâneo do grande dorsal, tendo como pedículo os vasos subescapulares. Resultados: O paciente teve excelente evolução no pós-operatório, apresentando-se, no pós-operatório de 2 meses, com consolidação óssea e iniciando a flexão do cotovelo. Conclusões: Perante a utilização do retalho descrito, concluímos que esta modalidade de retalho se insere no arsenal dos retalhos ósseos de maior segurança nas reconstruções ósseas em geral.
Introduction: We report a case of reconstruction of the proximal third of the right humerus and rehabilitation of the elbow in a 20-year-old male patient who was injured in an automobile accident and developed bone necrosis of 5 cm at the proximal third of the humerus and avulsion of the brachial biceps. Methods: A scapular bone flap was used, together with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap, using subscapular vessels for the pedicle. Results: The patient had excellent postoperative course, presenting in the 2-month postoperative period with bone consolidation and initiation of elbow flexion. Conclusions: This flap modality is a safe and useful option for bone reconstruction.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , History, 21st Century , Osteonecrosis , Retrospective Studies , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Elbow , Superficial Back Muscles , Superficial Back Muscles/injuries , Myocutaneous Flap , Humerus , Osteonecrosis/surgery , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Elbow/surgery , Elbow/injuries , Superficial Back Muscles/surgery , Myocutaneous Flap/surgery , Humerus/surgeryABSTRACT
Os bisfosfonatos (BFs) são drogas indicadas para o tratamento de doenças do metabolismo ósseo. Seu emprego terapêutico aumentou e, com ele, os efeitos adversos. A osteonecrose dos maxilares induzida por bisfosfonatos (OMB) é um efeito adverso grave relacionado com doenças reabsortivas ósseas. A OMB é definida como o desenvolvimento de osso necrótico na cavidade oral de um paciente que esteja recebendo tratamento com bisfosfonatos e não tenha recebido radioterapia em região de cabeça e pescoço. Até o momento seu mecanismo fisiopatológico ainda é pouco compreendido e tem sido alvo de inúmeros estudos. A associação entre o uso dos bisfosfonatos e a osteonecrose dos maxilares tem sido relatada, principalmente, em pacientes submetidos a exodontias. A etiologia, a variedade de sinais e sintomas clínicos da OMB, as medidas preventivas, os efeitos da interrupção do uso dos BFs, bem como os indicadores de prognóstico dessa doença permanecem indefinidos. Com relação ao tratamento, apesar de existirem protocolos, não há consenso na literatura quanto a sua eficácia. O objetivo deste trabalho é relatar um caso clínico de osteonecrose induzida por bisfosfonatos após exodontia em maxila, sítio menos acometido (AU).
Bisphosphonates (BFs) are drugs indicated for bone metabolism diseases treatment. Its therapeutic use has increased and, with it, the adverse effects. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a serious adverse effect related to bone resorptive diseases. BRONJ is defined as the development of necrotic bone in the oral cavity of a patient who is receiving bisphosphonate treatment and has not received radiotherapy in the head and neck region. To this date, its pathophysiological mechanism is still poorly understood and has been the subject of numerous studies. The association between the use of bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw has been reported mainly in patients who underwent exodontias. The etiology, the variety of clinical signs and symptoms of BRONJ, preventive measures, effects of discontinuation of BFs use, as well as the prognostic indicators of this disease remain undefined. Regarding the treatment, although there are protocols, there is no consensus about its efficacy in literature. The aim of this study is to report a clinical case of bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis after maxillary extraction, the site less affected (AU).
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Osteonecrosis/etiology , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Tooth Extraction , Brazil , Case Reports , Radiography, Panoramic/instrumentation , Maxillary Diseases/pathology , JawABSTRACT
Uma paciente do sexo feminino, com 72 anos de idade e exposição óssea intraoral, portadora de osteoporose, fazia uso de bifosfonatos há mais de cinco anos. Na região posterior mandibular direita havia osso exposto, hiperemia dos tecidos moles e exsudato purulento. A região mandibular anterior mostrava drenagem de secreção purulenta. Como havia necessidade de cirurgia de fêmur por recomendação médica, a paciente foi submetida à medicação específica (amoxicilina 500 mg, metronidazol 400 mg) e irrigação local com clorexidina 0,12%. Seis meses depois, e mediante os exames de TCFC e CTx sérico, foi realizada a terapia com fibrina leucoplaquetária autóloga. Estas biomembranas foram colocadas nas áreas de osso necrótico. Depois de 15 dias, observou-se uma grande exposição da área operada. Porém, clinicamente, já se notava neovascularização. Após 30 dias, havia grande epitelização da área que se encontrava exposta anteriormente. O caso foi controlado por mais 30 dias, totalizando 60 dias, podendo ser observada uma grande cobertura de tecido mole bem vascularizada e queratinizada na região. As terapias propostas para tratamento não apresentam eficácia suficiente para serem consideradas como protocolos. Dentro dos limites deste relato, a utilização da fibrina leucoplaquetária autóloga apresentou-se favorável como alternativa após dez meses e sem recidivas, abrindo perspectivas para tratar as necroses induzidas por estes medicamentos.
A 72 years-old female patient presented with intraoral bone exposure, osteoporosis, and bisphosphonate use (> 5 years). Also, at the posterior mandible, there was soft tissue hyperemia and pus. On the other hand, the anterior mandible presented with purulent drainage. Due to the need of a hip replacement by medical recommendation, the patient was submitted to specific pharmacological regimen (Amoxicillin 500 mg, Metronidazole 400 mg), and 0.12% chlorhexidine rinses. Six months later, and after CBCT and seric CTx exams, the autologous leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin therapy was applied. These biomembranes covered areas of necrotic bone. After 15 days, there was great exposition at the surgical area. However, neovascularization was clinically observed followed 30 days later by epithelization of previously exposed areas. The case was controlled for more 30 days, where well-vascularized and keratinized soft tissue coverage was identified. The proposed therapy does not provide efficacy to be considered as protocols. However, within the limits of this presentation, the autologous leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin seems to be favorable as an alternative and after 10 months no complications were observed. This opens new perspectives to treat bisphosphonate induced bone necrosis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Biocompatible Materials , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Diphosphonates , Fibrin/therapeutic use , Osteonecrosis/drug therapy , Osteonecrosis/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis of bone is a frequent and severe complication of sickle cell disease and its treatment is not standardised. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of any surgical procedure compared with other surgical interventions or non-surgical procedures, on avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease in terms of efficacy and safety. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Additional trials were sought from the reference lists of papers identified by the search strategy.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 27 May 2016. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials comparing specific therapies for avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each author independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Since only one trial was identified, meta-analysis was not possible. MAIN RESULTS: One trial (46 participants) was eligible for inclusion. After randomization eight participants were withdrawn, mainly because they declined to participate in the trial. Data were analysed for 38 participants at the end of the trial. After a mean follow up of three years, hip core decompression and physical therapy did not show clinical improvement when compared with physical therapy alone using the score from the original trial (an improvement of 18.1 points for those treated with intervention therapy versus an improvement of 15.7 points with control therapy). There was no significant statistical difference between groups regarding major complications (hip pain, risk ratio 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.60; vaso-occlusive crises, risk ratio 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.80; very low quality of evidence); and acute chest syndrome, risk ratio 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.44 to 2.56; very low quality of evidence)). This trial did not report results on mortality or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that adding hip core decompression to physical therapy achieves clinical improvement in people with sickle cell disease with avascular necrosis of bone compared to physical therapy alone. However, we highlight that our conclusion is based on one trial with high attrition rates. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the role of hip-core depression for this clinical condition. Endpoints should focus on participants' subjective experience (e.g. quality of life and pain) as well as more objective 'time-to-event' measures (e.g. mortality, survival, hip longevity). The availability of participants to allow adequate trial power will be a key consideration for endpoint choice.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Hip Joint/surgery , Humans , Osteonecrosis/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis of bone is a frequent and severe complication of sickle cell disease and its treatment is not standardised. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of any surgical procedure compared with other surgical interventions or non-surgical procedures, on avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease in terms of efficacy and safety. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Additional trials were sought from the reference lists of papers identified by the search strategy.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 17 March 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing specific therapies for avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each author independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Since only one trial was identified, meta-analysis was not possible. MAIN RESULTS: One trial (46 participants) was eligible for inclusion. After randomisation eight participants were withdrawn, mainly because they declined to participate in the trial. Data were analysed for 38 participants at the end of the trial. After a mean follow up of three years, hip core decompression and physical therapy did not show clinical improvement when compared with physical therapy alone using the score from the original trial (an improvement of 18.1 points for those treated with intervention therapy versus an improvement of 15.7 points with control therapy). There was no significant statistical difference between groups regarding major complications (hip pain, relative risk (RR) 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 1.60; vaso-occlusive crises, RR 1.14 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.80; very low quality of evidence); and acute chest syndrome, RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.44 to 2.56; very low quality of evidence)). This trial did not report results on mortality or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that adding hip core decompression to physical therapy achieves clinical improvement in people with sickle cell disease with avascular necrosis of bone compared to physical therapy alone. However, we highlight that our conclusion is based on one trial with high attrition rates. Further randomised controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the role of hip-core depression for this clinical condition. Endpoints should focus on participants' subjective experience (e.g. quality of life and pain) as well as more objective 'time-to-event' measures (e.g. mortality, survival, hip longevity). The availability of participants to allow adequate trial power will be a key consideration for endpoint choice.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Hip Joint/surgery , Humans , Osteonecrosis/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Los pacientes oncohematológicos y oncológicos en general pueden recibir una atención endodóntica normal, siempre y cuando tengamos en cuenta su patología sistémica. El objetivo del presente trabajo es exponer las principales pautas que se deben considerar para realizar un tratamiento de endodoncia adecuado en pacientes oncológicos sometidos a quimioterapia y/o radioterapia.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Hematologic Diseases/therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Dental Care for Chronically Ill/methods , Root Canal Therapy/standards , Drug Therapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Leukemia/therapy , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Lymphoma/therapyABSTRACT
Los pacientes oncohematológicos y oncológicos en general pueden recibir una atención endodóntica normal, siempre y cuando tengamos en cuenta su patología sistémica. El objetivo del presente trabajo es exponer las principales pautas que se deben considerar para realizar un tratamiento de endodoncia adecuado en pacientes oncológicos sometidos a quimioterapia y/o radioterapia.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Dental Care for Chronically Ill/methods , Hematologic Diseases/therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Root Canal Therapy/standards , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Leukemia/therapy , Lymphoma/therapy , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Drug Therapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
La osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada al uso de bifosfonatos (OMIB) es una de las complicaciones más serias es una de las complicaciones másserias de la terapia con bifosfonatos.La OMIB puede ser observada en pacientes que reciben bifosfonatos por vía sistémica para la terapéutica delmieloma múltiple o metástasis óseas y, también en pacientes medicados con bifosfonatos por vía oral para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis. De acuerdo a la American Association of Oral and MaxillofacialSurgeons (AAOMS), la OMIB es definida como la exposición de hueso necrótico en la región maxilofacial con una persistencia mayor a 8 semanas, en asociación con una terapia previa o en curso de bifosfonatos y que no ha sido sometido a radioterapia dirigida a cabeza y cuello.El objeto de esta revisión bibliográfica fue, de acuerdo a los artículos estudiados, determinar la efectividad delestudio Beta crosslaps sérico (CTX) en la prevención de la osteonecrosis de los maxilares, en pacientes medicadoscon bifosfonatos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Jaw Diseases/drug therapy , Biomarkers , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/prevention & control , Collagen , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
La osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada al uso de bifosfonatos (OMIB) es una de las complicaciones más serias es una de las complicaciones másserias de la terapia con bifosfonatos.La OMIB puede ser observada en pacientes que reciben bifosfonatos por vía sistémica para la terapéutica delmieloma múltiple o metástasis óseas y, también en pacientes medicados con bifosfonatos por vía oral para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis. De acuerdo a la American Association of Oral and MaxillofacialSurgeons (AAOMS), la OMIB es definida como la exposición de hueso necrótico en la región maxilofacial con una persistencia mayor a 8 semanas, en asociación con una terapia previa o en curso de bifosfonatos y que no ha sido sometido a radioterapia dirigida a cabeza y cuello.El objeto de esta revisión bibliográfica fue, de acuerdo a los artículos estudiados, determinar la efectividad delestudio Beta crosslaps sérico (CTX) en la prevención de la osteonecrosis de los maxilares, en pacientes medicadoscon bifosfonatos. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Biomarkers , Osteonecrosis/prevention & control , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Jaw Diseases/drug therapy , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Collagen , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis of bone is a frequent and severe complication of sickle cell disease and its treatment is not standardised. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of any surgical procedure compared with other surgical interventions or non-surgical procedures, on avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease in terms of efficacy and safety. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Additional trials were sought from the reference lists of papers identified by the search strategy.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 21 February 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing specific therapies for avascular necrosis of bone in people with sickle cell disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each author independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Since only one trial was identified, meta-analysis was not possible. MAIN RESULTS: One trial (46 participants) was eligible for inclusion. After randomisation eight participants were withdrawn, mainly because they declined to participate in the trial. Data were analysed for 38 participants at the end of the trial. After a mean follow up of three years, hip core decompression and physical therapy did not show clinical improvement when compared with physical therapy alone using the score from the original trial (an improvement of 18.1 points for those treated with intervention therapy versus an improvement of 15.7 points with control therapy). There was no significant statistical difference between groups regarding major complications (hip pain, relative risk (RR) 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 1.60; vaso-occlusive crises, RR 1.14 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.80); and acute chest syndrome, RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.44 to 2.56)). This trial did not report results on mortality or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that adding hip core decompression to physical therapy achieves clinical improvement in people with sickle cell disease with avascular necrosis of bone compared to physical therapy alone. However, we highlight that our conclusion is based on one trial with high attrition rates. Further randomised controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the role of hip-core depression for this clinical condition. Endpoints should focus on participants' subjective experience (e.g. quality of life and pain) as well as more objective 'time-to-event' measures (e.g. mortality, survival, hip longevity). The availability of participants to allow adequate trial power will be a key consideration for endpoint choice.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Humans , Osteonecrosis/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
El empleo de los bifosfonatos es una medicación eficaz en el tratamiento de lesiones osteolíticas. Sin embargo, con el tiempo de su utilización, se observaron en algunos casos la aparición de osteonecrosis en los huesos maxilares. Ante esta patología agregado, se determinaron procedimientos para minimizar estos efectos secundarios.
Subject(s)
Humans , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Osteonecrosis/diagnosis , Osteonecrosis/prevention & control , Osteonecrosis/therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Bone Diseases/complicationsABSTRACT
El empleo de los bifosfonatos es una medicación eficaz en el tratamiento de lesiones osteolíticas. Sin embargo, con el tiempo de su utilización, se observaron en algunos casos la aparición de osteonecrosis en los huesos maxilares. Ante esta patología agregado, se determinaron procedimientos para minimizar estos efectos secundarios.(AU)