A survey of cancer patients' interest in undertaking exercise to promote relaxation during radiotherapy for breast cancer and metastatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25-50% of patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) experience psychological distress and anxiety, which can detrimentally affect both their quality of life and treatment outcomes. While previous research has demonstrated that relaxation exercises can enhance the tolerability of RT and alleviate associated stress and anxiety, the specific needs for such therapies in radiation oncology remain under-explored. This study aims to investigate the demand for and preferences toward relaxation exercises among radiotherapy patients, addressing a critical gap in patient-centered care. METHODS: A prospective pseudonymized survey study using a one-time paper-based questionnaire was conducted from 2022 to 2023 among patients undergoing curative-intent RT for breast cancer or patients undergoing palliative RT for bone metastases. Patients were asked in a 11-item questionnaire about their anxiety, pre-existing practice of relaxation exercises/interventions, their interest in relaxation exercises, and preferences on the type and format of instruction. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: 100 patients (74 female and 26 male) responded, of whom 68 received curative-intent adjuvant RT and 32 palliative RT. Median age was 62 years. 78% of patients indicated a desire to be actively involved in their radiotherapy, but only 27% had used relaxation exercises prior to RT. 44.8% of both curatively and palliatively treated patients who wanted to be actively involved in their therapy desired to learn how to best relax. 56.4% of respondents were willing to spend extra time learning offered exercises. CONCLUSION: The survey indicates that patients undergoing RT, both for curative or palliative intent, desire relaxation exercises to relieve stress and anxiety from RT. It is therefore important to assess the need for relaxation interventions in individual patients and to develop suitable programs or collaborate with other healthcare professionals to meet these needs.

Minimally invasive palliative treatment of malignant tracheoesophageal fistula using cardiac septal occluder.

INTRODUCTION: Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) especially malignant TEF (mTEF) is an uncommon yet critical medical condition necessitating immediate intervention. This life-threatening condition frequently manifests in critically ill patients who are dependent on prolonged mechanical ventilation and are unsuitable candidates for thoracotomy due to their compromised health status. The Management of these mTEF patients remain a significant challenge.This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a cardiac septal occluder for the closure of mTEF. METHODS: 8 patients with mTEF underwent closure surgery using atrial/ventricular septal defect (ASD/VSD) septal occluders at the Respiratory Department of HuBei Yichang Central People's Hospital from 2021 to 2023. The procedure involved percutaneous placement of the occluder through the fistula to achieve closure. RESULTS: The placement of the cardiac septal occluder was successfully achieved with ease and efficiency in all patients. The study demonstrated that the use of cardiac septal occluder therapy in patients with mTEF can alleviate symptoms, improve quality of life, and enhance survival rates, with no significant complications observed. Furthermore, the study provided comprehensive details on surgical indications, preoperative evaluation and diagnosis, selection of occluder, methods of occlusion, and postoperative care. CONCLUSIONS: The application of cardiac septal occluder in the treatment of mTEF is a safe and effective palliative treatment. This approach may be particularly beneficial for patients with a high risk of complications and mortality associated with traditional surgical interventions.

Palliative single-level selective dorsal rhizotomy for children with spastic cerebral palsy Gross Motor Function Classification System level IV and V: a case series and systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Single-level selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR), typically indicated for ambulatory patients, is a controversial topic for severe spastic cerebral palsy (CP) with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level IV or V. The objective of this case series and systematic literature review was to outline the indication and outcome of palliative SDR for nonambulatory patients with CP and GMFCS level IV and V, focusing on improvement of spasticity and of patient and caregiver reported quality of life assessment. METHODS: A retrospective case series of patients with CP and GMFCS level IV or V who underwent single-level SDR at the authors' institution is presented. Furthermore, two databases (PubMed and Embase) were searched and a systematic review with a search string based on the terms "selective dorsal rhizotomy," "cerebral palsy," and "outcome" was conducted. The primary outcome was the reduction of spasticity based on the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes were change on the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66), evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), surgical morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: Eleven consecutive children under the age of 25 years undergoing palliative single-level SDR were included. All patients showed a reduction in MAS score (mean 1.09 ± 0.66 points) and no surgical morbidity and mortality occurred. For the systematic review results from our case series, in addition to 4 reports, 274 total patients were included. Reduction of spasticity based on MAS score was noted in all studies (mean range 1.09-3.2 points). Furthermore, in 2 studies spasticity of the upper extremities showed a MAS score reduction as well (range 1.7-2.8 points). The GMFM-66 score improved in 72% of the patients, while bladder function improved in 78% of the patients. Based on the PROMs, 92% of the patients/caregivers were satisfied with the outcome and their quality of life after the procedure. Two wound infections (2.7%) and one CSF leak (1.3%) occurred, while no surgery-related deaths were described. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed an improvement in spasticity, daily care, and comfort for patients with CP and GMFCS levels IV and V. Larger cohorts analyzing the outcome of palliative single-level SDR, based on the MAS, GMFM-66, and PROMs, are still needed and should be the focus of future studies. Systematic review registration no.: CRD42024495762 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Fatores preditores associados a ocorrência de lesão por pressão em pacientes em cuidados paliativos oncológicos / Predictive factors associated with the occurrence of pressure injuries in patients undergoing cancer palliative care / Factores predictivos asociados con la aparición de lesiones por presión en pacientes sometidos a cuidados paliativos oncológicos

Objetivo: Avaliar os fatores preditores para ocorrência de lesão por pressão em pacientes oncológicos em cuidados paliativos. Métodos: Estudo epidemiológico observacional, analítico, com delineamento transversal e abordagem quantitativa. A coleta de dados foi realizada com 105 participantes, no período de maio a outubro de 2019, em uma Clínica de Cuidados Paliativos Oncológicos de um Centro de Alta Complexidade em Oncologia. Os foram inseridos no software Biostat 5.0, em que foi realizada primeiramente a análise de regressão logística univariada, e posteriormente foram selecionadas as variáveis para a regressão logística múltipla e assim definiram-se os fatores preditivos para lesão por pressão. Resultados: A prevalência identificada foi de 19,04% para lesão por pressão. A maioria da amostra eram mulheres (60%), com idade menor que 70 anos (70%). Dois terços apresentavam risco muito alto (15%), para lesão por pressão segundo a Escala de Braden, e possuíam como diagnóstico primário câncer de próstata (20%), seguido de colo uterino (15%). Conclusão: A presença de lesão medular e o uso de fralda descartável demonstrou forte correlação com o desenvolvimento de lesão por pressão, sendo estes os fatores preditivos identificados neste estudo. Conhecer o perfil desses pacientes auxilia na elaboração e sistematização das condutas de enfermagem, visando melhor qualidade e segurança no cuidado. (AU)

Objective: To evaluate the predictive factors for the occurrence of pressure injuries in cancer patients undergoing palliative care. Methods: Observational, analytical, cross-sectional epidemiological study with a quantitative approach. Data collection was carried out with 105 participants, from May to October 2019, in an Oncology Palliative Care Clinic of a High Complexity Oncology Center. The data were entered into the Biostat 5.0 software, in which the univariate logistic regression analysis was first performed, and then the variables for the multiple logistic regression were selected, thus defining the predictive factors for pressure injury. Results: The identified prevalence was 19.04% for pressure injuries. Most of the sample were women (60%), aged under 70 years (70%). Two-thirds were at very high risk (15%) for pressure injury according to the Braden Scale, and had prostate cancer as a primary diagnosis (20%), followed by cervix (15%). Conclusion: The presence of spinal cord injury and the use of a disposable diaper showed a strong correlation with the development of pressure injury, which are the predictive factors identified in this study. Knowing the profile of these patients helps in the elaboration and systematization of nursing procedures, aiming at better quality and safety in care. (AU)

Objetivo: Evaluar los factores predictivos de la ocurrencia de lesiones por presión en pacientes oncológicos sometidos a cuidados paliativos. Métodos: Estudio epidemiológico observacional, analítico, transversal con enfoque cuantitativo. La recolección de datos se realizó con 105 participantes, de mayo a octubre de 2019, en una Clínica de Cuidados Paliativos Oncológicos de un Centro Oncológico de Alta Complejidad. Los datos se ingresaron en el software Biostat 5.0, en el cual se realizó primero el análisis de regresión logística univariante, y luego se seleccionaron las variables para la regresión logística múltiple, definiendo así los factores predictivos de lesión por presión. Resultados: La prevalencia identificada fue del 19,04% para las lesiones por presión. La mayoría de la muestra fueron mujeres (60%), menores de 70 años (70%). Dos tercios tenían un riesgo muy alto (15%) de lesión por presión según la escala de Braden y tenían cáncer de próstata como diagnóstico primario (20%), seguido del cuello uterino (15%). Conclusión: La presencia de lesión medular y el uso de pañal desechable mostró una fuerte correlación con el desarrollo de lesión por presión, que son los factores predictivos identificados en este estudio. Conocer el perfil de estos pacientes ayuda en la elaboración y sistematización de los procedimientos de enfermería, buscando una mejor calidad y seguridad en la atención. (AU)

[Improving the Rate of Palliative Care Completion in NICU Nurses].

BACKGROUND: Critically ill neonates receive care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Unfortunately, some neonates pass away in the NICU. Providing comprehensive neonatal palliative care and hospice services is crucial in supporting parents through the loss of their offspring. In our NICU, we identified that only 74.5% of nurses are able to properly recognize the need for palliative care and only 55% are able to implement the necessary procedures. PURPOSE: A project was designed and implemented to enhance the ability of nursing staff to recognize the need for and properly implement palliative care to improve the quality of this care in the NICU. RESOLUTIONS: We organized an on-the-job education and training program within our NICU with the goals of heightening awareness among nursing staff. In addition, a specialist palliative care operation flow chart, process preparation checklist, and palliative-care-related tools were created to facilitate the care process. RESULTS: After program implementation, among nursing staff in our NICU, the palliative care recognition accuracy rate rose to 100% (from 74.5%) and the implementation rate rose to 94.8% (from 55%). The quality of provided neonatal palliative care and hospice services was significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: The developed program was shown to significantly improve nursing staff recognition and implementation of neonatal palliative care in our NICU. This experience provides a reference for improving palliative care quality and for helping families effectively manage end-of-life challenges.

Designing a Mentorship Program for APRNs in Specialty Palliative Care Practice.

ABSTRACT: As advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) enter practice, support is crucial for success. Formal mentorship has been shown to improve employee turnover, job satisfaction, and clinical competence. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, an APRN team specializing in palliative care experienced an unprecedented rate of staff turnover. As a result, the team decided to create a formal mentorship program to support newly hired colleagues and assist their transition to practice. A subcommittee of APRNs within the palliative care practice met to establish a mentorship practice framework, expectations for the program, and a methodology for matching mentors and mentees. The mentorship program was implemented with two cohorts comprising a total of five mentors and six mentees. It was evaluated by participants using surveys asking open-ended, qualitative questions. Both mentors and mentees reported finding the program valuable. Mentees felt the program helped their transition to practice, created a forum for peer support, and improved their clinical competence. Mentors said the program furthered their own professional development, advanced their clinical growth, and fostered a connection to colleagues. Employee engagement and alignment improved, and staff turnover decreased. Further work is needed to improve on the program framework and analyze the outcomes of mentorship.

Opioid Therapy for Cancer Pain in Vietnam: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers Among Health Care Professionals, Policymakers, and Regulators.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers among health care professionals (HCPs), policymakers, and regulators in Vietnam related to opioid therapy for cancer pain. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in Vietnam from June to August 2022. Participants completed a questionnaire on their demographic characteristics, knowledge and attitudes toward opioid therapy, and barriers to accessing opioids for cancer pain. RESULTS: Two hundred seven HCPs and 15 policymakers/regulators completed the questionnaire. Poor knowledge about opioids in cancer pain was found in 63.3% of HCPs and 80.0% of policymakers/regulators. Poor knowledge was associated with a lack of training in cancer pain management or palliative care (PC; prevalence ratio [PR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.24]). Negative attitudes toward opioid therapy in cancer pain were held by 64.7% of HCPs and 80.0% of policymakers/regulators. Negative attitudes were associated with the unavailability of oral morphine in the workplace (PR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.20]). The most common major barriers reported were the absence of national policy on pain management and PC (34.7%), inadequate training in opioid use for cancer pain (33.8%), lockdown of health facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic (32.4%), limited opioid availability in local health facilities (32.4%), and excessively restrictive regulation of opioid dispensing in pharmacies (32.4%). CONCLUSION: This study found a knowledge deficit and negative attitudes toward opioid therapy for cancer pain among HCPs and policymakers/regulators. Improving education and training in opioid therapy is essential. Recognizing major barriers can guide strategies to enhance safe opioid accessibility for cancer pain management in Vietnam.

Palliative Care Practices and Knowledge of Home Care Nurses in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Palliative Care (PC) is an interdisciplinary specialty focused on relieving symptoms and optimizing quality of life for people living with serious illnesses and their families. A great need for PC exists in Saudi Arabia due to its aging population and prevalence of cancer and other chronic diseases. Home healthcare can make PC more accessible to patients, but clinicians must be equipped with the PC knowledge and skills to perform their roles. This study was a descriptive, correlational examination of PC practices and knowledge of home care nurses recruited from military hospitals in Saudi Arabia. We surveyed participants using the Palliative Care Quiz for Nursing (PCQN) and the Modified Global Home Health Nursing Care Assessment Questionnaire. The mean PCQN score was 8.40, indicating low levels of PC knowledge. A nurses' demographic and physical, spiritual, religious, cultural, linguistic, ethical, and legal aspects of care revealed significant associations. Given the low levels of PC knowledge and skills, we recommend focusing on education, training, and research. Universities should review their curriculum to ensure PC content. Hospitals should provide training programs focused on all aspects of PC, specifically emotional and spiritual, without limiting training to physical aspects of care. Future research is also needed to inform policy in this area.

Transformative Peer Connections: Early Experiences From the ASCO Palliative Care Community of Practice.

The integration of palliative care into routine oncology practice is the standard of care by most leading cancer organizations. Palliative medicine helps to deliver higher quality of care at a lower cost. However, there are barriers to implementing palliative oncology at many institutions for myriad reasons. In this article, we discuss an innovative strategy that ASCO implemented called the Communities of Practice (CoP). We share our experiences as the Palliative Care CoP and how our group seeks to develop processes and structures to collectively promote systemic change and enhance palliative care delivery for people with cancer. Our Palliative Care CoP engages with senior leaders, administrators, and those in power to achieve a shared vision of delivering holistic health care for people with serious illness. We continue to evolve to meet our members' growing needs by addressing eight main domains: (1) increasing palliative care education and resources; (2) creating opportunities for global palliative care research; (3) providing peer mentorship and community building; (4) engaging with patient advocates; (5) supporting and developing interdisciplinary teams; (6) assisting with professional development and identity formation, especially for trainees and early career faculty; (7) extending our outreach through social media; and (8) enhancing the clinical practice of palliative oncology. The ASCO CoP has been a vital forum to realize ASCO's mission of conquering cancer and advancing the Art and Science of Cancer Care: From Comfort to Cure.

Integrating Palliative Care and Hematologic Malignancies: Bridging the Gaps for Our Patients and Their Caregivers.

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) struggle with immense physical and psychological symptom burden, which negatively affect their quality of life (QOL) throughout the continuum of illness. These patients are often faced with substantial prognostic uncertainty as they navigate their illness course, which further complicates their medical decision making, especially at the end of life (EOL). Consequently, patients with HM often endure intensive medical care at the EOL, including frequent hospitalization and intensive care unit admissions, and they often die in the hospital. Our EOL health care delivery models are not well suited to meet the unique needs of patients with HMs. Although studies have established the role of specialty palliative care for improving QOL and EOL outcomes in patients with solid tumors, numerous disease-, clinician-, and system-based barriers prevail, limiting the integration of palliative care for patients with HMs. Nonetheless, multiple studies have emerged over the past decade identifying the role of palliative care integration in patients with various HMs, resulting in improvements in patient-reported QOL, symptom burden, and psychological distress, as well as EOL care. Importantly, these studies have also identified active components of specialty palliative care interventions, including strategies to promote adaptive coping especially in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Future work can leverage the knowledge gained from specialty palliative care integration to develop and test primary palliative care interventions by training clinicians caring for patients with HMs to incorporate these strategies into their clinical practice.

Survivorship in Advanced Lung Cancer: Understanding a New Landscape and Opportunities.

People with advanced lung cancer represent a distinct group whose needs remain understudied, especially compared with people diagnosed with limited-stage disease. Fortunately, novel treatments such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors are leading to significant advances in prognosis and survival, even among those with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. However, there are known gaps in symptom management, psychosocial and nutritional support, complex care coordination, health behavior coaching, and health care delivery efforts among patients living with advanced lung cancer. Many of these patients would benefit from survivorship and palliative care approaches. In particular, survivorship care may include health care maintenance, treatment of immune-related adverse events and late- or long-term effects, frailty assessment and rehabilitation, and care coordination. Palliative care may be best suited to discuss ongoing symptom management, advanced care planning, and end-of-life considerations, as well as psychosocial well-being. To this end, we share a review of the current status of the palliative and survivorship care infrastructure for patients with advanced lung cancer and provide suggestions across the care continuum for this diverse group of patients and families.

Patient and caregiver shared experiences of pulmonary fibrosis (PF): A systematic literature review.

Pulmonary Fibrosis (PF) describes a group of lung diseases characterised by progressive scarring (fibrosis). Symptoms worsen over time and include breathlessness, tiredness, and cough, giving rise to psychological distress. Significant morbidity accompanies PF, so ensuring patients' care needs are well defined and provided for, represents an important treatment strategy. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise what is currently known about the psychosocial morbidity, illness experience and needs of people with pulmonary fibrosis and their informal caregivers. Eight databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane database of Systematic reviews (CDSR), Web of Science Social Sciences Citation Index, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES and CINAHL) were used to identify studies exploring the supportive needs of adults with PF and/or their caregivers. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. 53 studies were included, the majority using qualitative methodology (79 %, 42/53), 6 as part of mixed methodological studies. Supportive care needs were mapped to eight domains using an a priori framework analysis. Findings highlight a lack of psychological support throughout the course of the illness, misconceptions about and barriers to, the provision of palliative care despite its potential positive impacts. Patients and caregivers express a desire for greater disease specific education and information provision throughout the illness. Trials of complex interventions are needed to address the unique set of challenges for patients and carers living with PF.

Machine learning-based model to predict delirium in patients with advanced cancer treated with palliative care: a multicenter, patient-based registry cohort.

This study aimed to present a new approach to predict to delirium admitted to the acute palliative care unit. To achieve this, this study employed machine learning model to predict delirium in patients in palliative care and identified the significant features that influenced the model. A multicenter, patient-based registry cohort study in South Korea between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Delirium was identified by reviewing the medical records based on the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. The study dataset included 165 patients with delirium among 2314 patients with advanced cancer admitted to the acute palliative care unit. Seven machine learning models, including extreme gradient boosting, adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, light gradient boosting, logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest, were evaluated to predict delirium in patients with advanced cancer admitted to the acute palliative care unit. An ensemble approach was adopted to determine the optimal model. For k-fold cross-validation, the combination of extreme gradient boosting and random forest provided the best performance, achieving the following accuracy metrics: 68.83% sensitivity, 70.85% specificity, 69.84% balanced accuracy, and 74.55% area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The performance of the isolated testing dataset was also validated, and the machine learning model was successfully deployed on a public website ( http://ai-wm.khu.ac.kr/Delirium/ ) to provide public access to delirium prediction results in patients with advanced cancer. Furthermore, using feature importance analysis, sex was determined to be the top contributor in predicting delirium, followed by a history of delirium, chemotherapy, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and living with family. Based on a large-scale, multicenter, patient-based registry cohort, a machine learning prediction model for delirium in patients with advanced cancer was developed in South Korea. We believe that this model will assist healthcare providers in treating patients with delirium and advanced cancer.

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of critical care unit personnel regarding pediatric palliative care: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the perceptions of healthcare providers in China regarding pediatric palliative care, particularly in critical care units (PICUs), where many children receive palliative care. To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of PICU personnel in China regarding pediatric palliative care. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in five cities in China (Shanghai, Suzhou, Chongqing, Chengdu and Yunnan) between November 2022 and December 2022. RESULTS: The analysis included 204 participants (122 females), with 158 nurses and 46 physicians. The average knowledge, attitude and practice scores were 9.75 ± 2.90 points (possible range, 0-13 points), 38.30 ± 3.80 points (possible range, 12-60 points) and 35.48 ± 5.72 points (possible range, 9-45 points), respectively. Knowledge score was higher for physicians than for nurses (P < 0.001) and for personnel with previous training in pediatric palliative care (P = 0.005). According to structural equation modelling knowledge had a direct positive effect on attitude (ß = 0.69 [0.28-1.10], p = 0.001), and indirect on practice (ß = 0.82 [0.36-1.28], p < 0.001); attitude had significant effect on practice as well (ß = 1.18 [0.81-1.56], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is room for improvement in the knowledge, attitudes and practices of PICU personnel in China regarding pediatric palliative care. The findings of this study may facilitate the design and implementation of targeted education/training programs to better inform physicians and nurses in China about pediatric palliative care.

Towards proactive palliative care in oncology: developing an explainable EHR-based machine learning model for mortality risk prediction.

BACKGROUND: Ex-ante identification of the last year in life facilitates a proactive palliative approach. Machine learning models trained on electronic health records (EHR) demonstrate promising performance in cancer prognostication. However, gaps in literature include incomplete reporting of model performance, inadequate alignment of model formulation with implementation use-case, and insufficient explainability hindering trust and adoption in clinical settings. Hence, we aim to develop an explainable machine learning EHR-based model that prompts palliative care processes by predicting for 365-day mortality risk among patients with advanced cancer within an outpatient setting. METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 5,926 adults diagnosed with Stage 3 or 4 solid organ cancer between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020 and receiving ambulatory cancer care within a tertiary center. The classification problem was modelled using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and aligned to our envisioned use-case: "Given a prediction point that corresponds to an outpatient cancer encounter, predict for mortality within 365-days from prediction point, using EHR data up to 365-days prior." The model was trained with 75% of the dataset (n = 39,416 outpatient encounters) and validated on a 25% hold-out dataset (n = 13,122 outpatient encounters). To explain model outputs, we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values. Clinical characteristics, laboratory tests and treatment data were used to train the model. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), while model calibration was assessed using the Brier score. RESULTS: In total, 17,149 of the 52,538 prediction points (32.6%) had a mortality event within the 365-day prediction window. The model demonstrated an AUROC of 0.861 (95% CI 0.856-0.867) and AUPRC of 0.771. The Brier score was 0.147, indicating slight overestimations of mortality risk. Explanatory diagrams utilizing SHAP values allowed visualization of feature impacts on predictions at both the global and individual levels. CONCLUSION: Our machine learning model demonstrated good discrimination and precision-recall in predicting 365-day mortality risk among individuals with advanced cancer. It has the potential to provide personalized mortality predictions and facilitate earlier integration of palliative care.

[Spatially fractionated radiotherapy : introduction into clinical practice]. / Radiothérapie fractionnée dans l'espace : introduction en pratique clinique.

Spatially fractionated radiotherapy is a new concept involving partial irradiation of tumor volumes. Different techniques are described: mini-beam and micro-beam radiotherapy (pre-clinical) and LATTICE radiotherapy (L-RT) (clinical). Although L-RT is emergent in clinical practice and its evidence is still limited, it has still revealed excellent outcomes. At least three clinical situations can be discussed: definitive palliative radiotherapy, dose escalation (boost) or salvage radiotherapy. The interaction between L-RT and the immune system is still under investigation. Preclinical observations have already demonstrated a strong interaction, with tumor response dependent on immune system stimulation and the generation of an abscopal effect.

La radiothérapie fractionnée dans l'espace est un nouveau concept consistant en une irradiation partielle des volumes tumoraux. Plusieurs techniques sont ainsi décrites : les radiothérapies mini-beam et micro-beam (pré-clinique) et la radiothérapie LATTICE (L-RT) (clinique). Bien que la L-RT soit relativement nouvelle dans la pratique clinique et que les preuves quant à son utilisation soient encore limitées, elle montre des résultats prometteurs. Au moins trois situations cliniques peuvent être examinées en détail : la radiothérapie palliative définitive, l'escalade de dose (boost) ou encore la radiothérapie de sauvetage. L'interaction entre la L-RT et le système immunitaire est encore en cours d'investigation, mais des observations précliniques ont déjà démontré une interaction forte, avec notamment la dépendance de la réponse tumorale à la stimulation du système immunitaire et la génération d'un effet abscopal.

Qualitative evaluation of motives for acceptance or refusal of early palliative care in patients included in early-phase clinical trials in a French comprehensive cancer center: the PALPHA study.

PURPOSE: The integration of palliative care (PC) into oncological management is recommended well before the end of life. It improves quality of life and symptom control and reduces the aggressiveness of end-of-life care. However, its appropriate timing is still debated. Entry into an early-phase clinical trial (ECT) represents hopes for the patient when standard treatments have failed. It is an opportune moment to integrate PC to preserve the patient's general health status. The objective of this study was to evaluate the motives for acceptance or refusal of early PC management in patients included in an ECT. METHODS: Patients eligible to enter an ECT were identified and concomitant PC was proposed. All patients received exploratory interviews conducted by a researcher. Their contents were analyzed in a double-blind thematic analysis with a self-determination model. RESULTS: Motives for acceptance (PC acceptors: n = 27) were both intrinsic (e.g., pain relief, psychological support, anticipation of the future) and extrinsic (e.g., trust in the medical profession, for a relative, to support the advance of research). Motives for refusal (PC refusers: n = 3) were solely intrinsic (e.g., PC associated with death, negative representation of psychological support, no need for additional care, claim of independence). CONCLUSIONS: The motives of acceptors and refusers are not internalized in the same way and call for different autonomy needs. Acceptors and refusers are influenced by opposite representations of PC and a different perception of mixed management.

SupporTive Care At Home Research (STAHR) for patients with advanced cancer: Protocol for a cluster non-randomized controlled trial.

Advancements in the treatment and management of patients with cancer have extended their survival period. To honor such patients' desire to live in their own homes, home-based supportive care programs have become an important medical practice. This study aims to investigate the effects of a multidimensional and integrated home-based supportive care program on patients with advanced cancer. SupporTive Care At Home Research is a cluster non-randomized controlled trial for patients with advanced cancer. This study tests the effects of the home-based supportive care program we developed versus standard oncology care. The home-based supportive care program is based on a specialized home-based medical team approach that includes (1) initial assessment and education for patients and their family caregivers, (2) home visits by nurses, (3) biweekly regular check-ups/evaluation and management, (4) telephone communication via a daytime access line, and (5) monthly multidisciplinary team meetings. The primary outcome measure is unplanned hospitalization within 6 months following enrollment. Healthcare service use; quality of life; pain and symptom control; emotional status; satisfaction with services; end-of-life care; advance planning; family caregivers' quality of life, care burden, and preparedness for caregiving; and medical expenses will be surveyed. We plan to recruit a total of 396 patients with advanced cancer from six institutions. Patients recruited from three institutions will constitute the intervention group, whereas those recruited from the other three institutions will comprise the control group.