Evaluación de la capacidad de penetración de partículas a cavidades perinasales usando el nebulizador PARI LC SPRINT® SINUS con técnica modificada en individuos sanos y portadores de rinosinusitis crónica por fibrosis quística con cirugía de cavidades perinasales / Evaluation of the penetration ability into perinasal sinuses of particles using the PARI LC SPRINT® SINUS nebulizer with a modified technique in healthy individuals and in cystic fibrosis patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with endoscopic sinus surgery

Introducción: En pacientes con rinosinusitis crónica (RSC) por fibrosis quística (FQ), los microorganismos que colonizan la vía aérea alta son los mismos que dañan el pulmón. Los tratamientos locales con nebulización de las cavidades perinasales (CPN) serían de ayuda. Objetivo: Evaluar la penetración de las partículas nebulizadas a las cavidades perinasales. Material y método: Voluntarios sanos y pacientes con RSC por FQ con cirugía endoscópica funcional (CEF). Se utilizó el nebulizador pulsátil que PARI LC SPRINT® SINUS. La penetración de partículas a las CPN se evaluó con fusión de imágenes cintigráficas SPECT y de tomografía computarizada (CT). Resultados: Se evaluaron 5 voluntarios y 2 pacientes con FQ. El procedimiento indicado por el fabricante del nebulizador fue imposible de realizar. Se modificó la forma de nebulización. Se observó solo el 9% del material nebulizado en las CPN en voluntarios y el 4% en pacientes. Una proporción importante del material nebulizado se depositó en pulmones y tubo digestivo. Conclusión: Los resultados iniciales motivaron la interrupción del estudio original considerando que sería difícil demostrar la diferencia en la efectividad del nebulizado para alcanzar las CPN entre pacientes con y sin CEF. Además, el depósito mayoritario del nebulizado fuera de las CPN, impide aclarar el valor del efecto local respecto a un posible efecto por vía general.

Introduction: In cystic fibrosis patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, the same microorganisms that colonize the upper airway are the ones who damage the lung. Local treatments by nebulization of perinasal sinuses would be helpful in these cases. Aim: To evaluate the penetration ability of nebulized particles into perinasal sinuses. Material and method: Healthy volunteers and cystic fibrosis patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with endoscopic sinus surgery had nasal nebulization using the pulsating nebulizer PARI LC Sprint® SINUS. Fusion of scintigraphic SPECT and CT images was used to evaluate the particles penetration ability into perinasal sinuses. Results: Five volunteers and 2 patients with CF were evaluated. It was not possible to perform the nebulization procedure as indicated by the manufacturer. A continous nebulization was done instead. 9% of the nebulized material was deposited in the perinasal sinuses in volunteers and 4% in patients with CF, while the rest of the particles were distributed in the body, specially in lungs and digestive tract. Conclusions: The main deposition of the nasal nebulized solution was outside the perinasal sinuses. These results led to discontinuation of the study because it would be difficult to prove a difference in the effectiveness of nebulized particles among patients with and without surgery. It also seems impossible to define the real value of local perinasal sinus therapies considering a probable systemic effect.

Culture-inappropriate antibiotic therapy decreases quality of life improvement after sinus surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite their widespread use, antibiotics have not been shown to improve chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) outcomes. We aimed to determine whether culture-inappropriate postoperative antibiotic therapy was associated with less quality-of-life (QOL) improvement following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study recruited 376 adult CRS patients undergoing FESS between October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011. Patient demographics, comorbidities and medications were collected at baseline. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin were administered for 2 weeks postoperatively. The antibiotic appropriateness was determined based on bacterial resistance profile of organisms identified during intraoperative culture. The QOL outcome was defined as change of 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test scores from preoperative visit to 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month post-FESS. Clinically significant difference was defined as at least 0.5 standard deviations (SD) of baseline QOL score in the reference group. Mixed-effects regression models were performed. RESULTS: Seven percent of patients (n = 27) had culture-inappropriate antibiotic therapy, and additional 5% (n = 19) had culture-specific antibiotic adjustment. Compared to patients with culture-appropriate antibiotics, patients with culture-inappropriate antibiotics had significantly less improvement of QOL from baseline to postoperative 1-month and 3-month follow-up where the difference became clinically significant; patients with antibiotic adjustment had more QOL improvement from baseline to 1-month follow-up, but their QOL worsened at 3-month follow-up, and these changes were not clinically significant. However, all effects washed out at 6-month follow-up with no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Culture-inappropriate postoperative antibiotic therapy decreased short-term QOL improvement to a clinically meaningful level after FESS. Culture guided selection of antibiotics may improve short-term FESS outcome.